Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / PansLabyrinth

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Fantasy Ghetto treatment. A lot of people still put Fantasy and {{Disneyfication}} hand-in-hand and assume any Fantasy-themed films automatically are full of cuddles, jokes about farts, and LighterAndSofter plotlines, especially when children are involved as the main characters. They probably just ignored anything that didn't fit that narrow viewpoint when watching the trailer and just convinced themselves it was meant to be more of an Alice In Wonderland adventure or Chronicles of Narnia style film rather than realizing this was ''not'' meant to anything close to Disney or Shrek in terms of tone, characterization, or plotline.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** They probably had planned to but there was a couple factors working against them that just added to their bad luck of being in the wrong place at the wrong time. From a [[WatsonianVersusDoylist Watsonian perspective]], here's what went wrong. A) The younger man keeps sassing Vidal when he really needs to keep his mouth shut. Both of them understand they're in a tense spot but neither of them clearly expected Vidal to just sadistically ''murder'' them for no reason at all. Had he stayed quiet, Vidal might not have been in such a murderous mood. B) The father seems too scared to say much regarding the rabbits until he sees his son dying in front of him, at which point all he cares about is insulting Vidal one last time. C) Vidal takes a ''ridiculously'' long time going through their bag. He doesn't just pull out all the papers, he pulls out all the papers ''individually.'' If he'd just yanked everything out he could grasp at one time, he would have gotten to the rabbits by the second time he reached into the bag. D) Vidal's soldiers are idiots. He even tells them to search people more thoroughly next time instead of getting him involved. Had the soldiers just upended the bag all at once, the rabbits would have come tumbling out.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Meta: Why some people claimed this movie was marketed as a family friendly fantasy adventure a la ''Film/TheChroniclesOfNarnia'', when the actual trailer clearly showed torture devices and had a pretty grim tone, akin to a horror film?

to:

* Meta: Why some people claimed this movie was marketed as a family friendly fantasy adventure a la ''Film/TheChroniclesOfNarnia'', when the actual trailer clearly showed torture devices and had a pretty grim tone, akin to a horror film?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Meta: Why some people claimed this movie was marketed as a family friendly fantasy adventure a la ''Film/TheChroniclesOfNarnia'', when the actual trailer clearly showed torture devices and had a pretty grim tone, akin to a horror film?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* During Vidal's EstablishingCharacterMoment in which he brutally executes an innocent farmer and his father who only went out on a hunting trip, why couldn't the two just tell Vidal (and even to his men prior to his arrival) that there's rabbits in their bag right away that would prove their innocence easily?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** This seems to be supported by the fact that Ofelia didn't quite refuse to offer her brother's blood. What she refused to do was ''hand him over to the Faun'', saying "No! My brother stays with me." He left, based on this disobedience alone, before we could find out what she would have said if ''she'd'' been allowed to hold the knife.


Added DiffLines:

*** Sure, but I think the premise of the question is that such a rationalization is perfectly valid and thus should not strip a person of their innocence or pure-heartedness.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**Don’t forget: at this point of the movie she hadn’t eaten in many hours, practically for a day. And she is just a child.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
correctness


** The food being attractive could also be part of another SecretTestOfCharacter. Ofelia followed what she had been told on the first task, but on the second she disobeyed the Faun's orders and ate some of the forbidden food. So she had to deal with the consequences of her own actions, rather than following orders laid out for her. Although she woke up the Pale Man and got back too late to go through the door, she improvised and found another way out. Sure one fairy died as a result, but Ofelia still demonstrated that she could think under pressure, keep a clear head and find another solution. All qualities that a ruler would be expected to have. Who's to say that the second task wasn't designed in such a way that Ofelia couldn't resist the food (even if it wasn't enchanted, she still hadn't eaten in a while).

to:

** The food being attractive could also be part of another SecretTestOfCharacter. Ofelia followed what she had been told on the first task, but on the second she disobeyed the Faun's orders and ate some of the forbidden food. So she had to deal with the consequences of her own actions, rather than following orders laid out for her. Although she woke up the Pale Man and got back too late to go through the door, she improvised and found another way out. Sure one fairy two fairies died as a result, but Ofelia still demonstrated that she could think under pressure, keep a clear head and find another solution. All qualities that a ruler would be expected to have. Who's to say that the second task wasn't designed in such a way that Ofelia couldn't resist the food (even if it wasn't enchanted, she still hadn't eaten in a while).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The food being attractive could also be part of another SecretTestOfCharacter. Ofelia followed what she had been told on the first task, but on the second she disobeyed the Faun's orders and ate some of the forbidden food. So she had to deal with the consequences of her own actions, rather than following orders laid out for her. Although she woke up the Pale Man and got back too late to go through the door, she improvised and found another way out. Sure one fairy died as a result, but Ofelia still demonstrated that she could think under pressure, keep a clear head and find another solution. All qualities that a ruler would be expected to have. Who's to say that the second task wasn't designed in such a way that Ofelia couldn't resist the food (even if it wasn't enchanted, she still hadn't eaten in a while).


Added DiffLines:

** Maybe he's not a real entity at all, and it's just something created by the fairies to test Ofelia?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Now, it's been about 3 years since I've seen the movie, so details are a bit fuzzy, but this part of the ending really bothered me: ''Just what's so bad about a little baby blood??'' Now, I know that when people say that they want some of your blood -- even just a little! -- then that usually means that they're going to kill you and drain you of all of it. Were that the case, I could understand how this test would be a pass/fail re: Becoming a princess of a magic fairy kingdom. But mystical creatures, so far as I've come to know them, are literal to absurd proportions. So, if they say "just a little blood", you could ''totally'' get away with giving them just a drop, and they'd just have to say "Well, I guess that ''is'' what I said..." and deal with it. Going with that line of reasoning, this implies that drawing even a drop of blood from a baby -- even if it's to complete a series of tasks while on a mystical quest wherein all of your other tasks have been presented on the level (i.e. not secretly devised to kill you or otherwise full of trickery and underhandedness) -- means you're going to die alone and no one will ever know about it, instead of being transported to a land of magic and wonder. Now ''that'' is some underhanded mystical creature shit right there. The reason this pisses me off so much is because ''I so totally would have given him the baby blood''. I mean, Jesus, he's a baby, not a Romanov; it's not going to kill him to have a drop of blood lost. Unless causing even mild, momentary pain to another person, even with legitimate reason (magical quest! magical quest!) is enough to destroy your Innocent Little Girl status? To which I say: [[FelonyMisdemeanor What Do You Mean It's Heinous?]] Damn mystical creatures.
** I have not viewed the film in a long time, but I recall that look on her face. She seemed to suspect it was more than a cut.

to:

* Now, it's been about 3 years since I've seen the movie, so details are a bit fuzzy, but this This part of the ending is really bothered me: bothersome: ''Just what's so bad about a little baby blood??'' Now, I know that Now when people say that they want some of your blood -- even just a little! -- then that usually means that they're going to kill you and drain you of all of it. Were that the case, I could understand it's understandable how this test would be a pass/fail re: Becoming a princess of a magic fairy kingdom. But mystical creatures, so far as I've come to know them, are literal to absurd proportions. So, if they say "just a little blood", you could ''totally'' get away with giving them just a drop, and they'd just have to say "Well, I guess that ''is'' what I said..." and deal with it. Going with that line of reasoning, this implies that drawing even a drop of blood from a baby -- even if it's to complete a series of tasks while on a mystical quest wherein all of your other tasks have been presented on the level (i.e. not secretly devised to kill you or otherwise full of trickery and underhandedness) -- means you're going to die alone and no one will ever know about it, instead of being transported to a land of magic and wonder. Now ''that'' is some underhanded mystical creature shit right there. The reason this pisses me off so much is because ''I so totally would have given him the baby blood''. I mean, Jesus, he's He's a baby, not a Romanov; it's not going to kill him to have a drop of blood lost. Unless causing even mild, momentary pain to another person, even with legitimate reason (magical quest! magical quest!) is enough to destroy your Innocent Little Girl status? To which I say: Which seems awfully: [[FelonyMisdemeanor What Do You Mean It's Heinous?]] Damn mystical creatures.
** I have not viewed the film in a long time, but I recall Recall that look on her face. She seemed to suspect it was more than a cut.



*** Remember, the Faun could have meant "just a little blood" -- but he also could have gone the other way and told her that the little bit of blood she gave was not enough. Also, I think this is a testament to her strong character -- the child is only her half-brother, and his father is a vicious murderer. And it would have been very easy to blame the baby for her mother's death. But when the Faun gives her an easy proposition -- causing pain (albeit momentary) to a baby in order to go into the other world -- what answer does she give? "No."
** If I'm not mistaken, though, what the Faun had said was that she needed to use the "blood of an innocent" in order to pull it off... So why not use some of '''her own''' blood? Or did disobeying the Faun earlier cause her to become non-innocent?

to:

*** Remember, the Faun could have meant "just a little blood" -- but he also could have gone the other way and told her that the little bit of blood she gave was not enough. Also, I think this is a testament to her strong character -- the child is only her half-brother, and his father is a vicious murderer. And it would have been very easy to blame the baby for her mother's death. But when the Faun gives her an easy proposition -- causing pain (albeit momentary) to a baby in order to go into the other world -- what answer does she give? "No."
** If I'm not mistaken, though, what What the Faun had said was that she needed to use the "blood of an innocent" in order to pull it off... So why not use some of '''her own''' blood? Or did disobeying the Faun earlier cause her to become non-innocent?



** It's been three years since I've seen the movie too, but I still remember that scene and how it looked. The thought definitely occurred to me "Well if it's just a drop..." but I felt like I was looking at two characters neither of whom believed for a moment that it was really just a drop. The Faun had been acting creepier and creepier and now was acting extra creepy. And he had a HUGE knife. I think if he'd had a needle I'd have felt quite differently.

to:

** It's been three years since I've seen the movie too, but I still remember that scene and how it looked. The thought definitely occurred to me "Well if it's just a drop..." but I felt like I was looking Looking at two characters characters, neither of whom believed for a moment that it was really just a drop. The Faun had been acting creepier and creepier and now was acting extra creepy. And he had a HUGE knife. I think if If he'd had a needle I'd have felt instead one would interpret it quite differently.



** Well the secret test of character was that she wouldn't choose her own desires over the well-being of an innocent. She was told: the baby has to bleed for you to get to the fairy realm. As others have said, she ''could'' have resented the baby for being the cause of their mother's death -- but she chose to act as the baby's protector. She would not allow any harm to come to the child for whatever reason. A selfish person would rationalise it saying "it's only a ''little'' bit of blood." But Ofelia refusing proved that she was pure of heart and therefore able to enter the fairy realm. Also wasn't Ofelia under the impression that she would go straight to the fairy realm? If so then wouldn't that mean her brother had to stay behind? Perhaps Ofelia also didn't like the idea of leaving the baby alone and bleeding in a labyrinth in the middle of the night.
* Alright, I know this has been discussed before, but it's a major wallbanger, so it should go here, too. The problem is, ''why the bloody hell did Ofelia eat the damn fairy food!?'' Ofelia is a smart girl, and reads fairy stories; shouldn't she have learned something? And if you learn ''anything'' from fairy stories, it's that ''You Do Not Eat The Fairy Food''. It's one of those things that I learned so early I don't remember when -- ''Do Not Go Places with Strangers''. ''Do Not Leave Things for Other People to Trip Over''. ''[[RuleOfThree Do Not]] Eat the Fairy Food''. ''They Are Not Like Us'', ''What is Theirs is Not Ours'', ''You Do Not Mess with the Fey''. It's not that they're evil, but they're not human. So how come we expect them to be like us? Anyway. Sure, she was hungry, sure she's curious, sure it's a demonstration of how not all orders are obeyed, whatever. A fairy himself told her not to, even! But noooooo, she just had to eat them. And so [[CrapsackWorld it all goes down the drain]]. Gee, thanks!

to:

** Well the secret test of character was that she wouldn't choose her own desires over the well-being of an innocent. She was told: the baby has to bleed for you to get to the fairy realm. As others have said, she She ''could'' have resented the baby for being the cause of their mother's death -- but she chose to act as the baby's protector. She would not allow any harm to come to the child for whatever reason. A selfish person would rationalise it saying "it's only a ''little'' bit of blood." But Ofelia refusing proved that she was pure of heart and therefore able to enter the fairy realm. Also wasn't Ofelia under the impression that she would go straight to the fairy realm? If so then wouldn't that mean her brother had to stay behind? Perhaps Ofelia also didn't like the idea of leaving the baby alone and bleeding in a labyrinth in the middle of the night.
* Alright, I know this This has been discussed before, but it's a major wallbanger, so it should go here, too. The problem is, ''why the bloody hell did Ofelia eat the damn fairy food!?'' Ofelia is a smart girl, and reads fairy stories; shouldn't she have learned something? And if you learn ''anything'' from fairy stories, it's that ''You Do Not Eat The Fairy Food''. It's one of those things that I learned so early I don't remember when -- you learn early.''Do Not Go Places with Strangers''. ''Do Not Leave Things for Other People to Trip Over''. ''[[RuleOfThree Do Not]] Eat the Fairy Food''. ''They Are Not Like Us'', ''What is Theirs is Not Ours'', ''You Do Not Mess with the Fey''. It's not that they're evil, but they're not human. So how come we expect them to be like us? Anyway. Sure, she was hungry, sure she's curious, sure it's a demonstration of how not all orders are obeyed, whatever. A fairy himself told her not to, even! But noooooo, she just had to eat them. And so [[CrapsackWorld it all goes down the drain]]. Gee, thanks!



** The food is enchanted -- I'm always surprised by how many people don't get that. Look at the way she suddenly turns toward the grapes and the camera does a little sweeping pan to follow her gaze, with the Universal Standard Harp of Magical Mischief playing in the soundtrack. GenreBlind, yourself.
** Actually he is right. The food is not enchanted, Del Toro Himself says in the audio commentary that she hasn't eaten anything at all since her mother grounded her, there was a scene that didn't make it to the final cut where Ofelia was offered some food but she declined because he thought it would have been very obvious to the viewer.
** I posted this in the main page, but whether it will stay there is anyone's guess. Ofelia's acting like a character in certain fairy tales, which makes sense because she believes herself to be a fairy tale princess. In some fairy tales (but not all,) the main character will fail to listen to advice, or do something they were told specifically not to do -- and in the tales I can remember the reasoning is rather stupid, like not covering up the cage of a bird because it's too pretty (resulting in the bird's singing and alerting everyone in the castle that it's being stolen -- admittedly birds will still make SOME noise when they're covered, but not as much when they aren't!) And yes, if there is a person who is guiding the main character in their quests, they will get VERY pissed off about this. In some cases the tale ends here, but if it doesn't, the main character must do something to redeem themselves in the eyes of their quest-giver. Usually just listening to the instructions and following them to the letter is good enough, though sometimes (like in Ofelia's case) something more extreme is required. So Ofelia is just acting in accordance with the fairy-tale princess that she believes she is -- and in her case, she's the kind of fairy tale character that messes up once in a while, because nobody's perfect. It took me a while to realize this, and I have read *tons* of fairy tales.
** The second time I saw the movie, I read it as a parallel to Ofelia's mother marrying Captain Vidal, and buying into his luxury, power, and prestige, even though she has to know something of what a monster he is. She let greed overrule fear, and Ofelia did the same.
*** ETA: ''Not'' that it is a bad thing to look out for not only your own welfare, but that of your young daughter, during warfare. Carmen is making a pragmatic choice (or making the best of a bad situation that wasn't much of her choosing,) but I still think her decision is meant to parallel Ofelia's.
** I think it's worth noting what happened right before she notices the grapes. The fairies direct her to the wrong door. She ignores them and she gets the dagger. In that instance disobedience turns out to be the right choice. It's not much of a stretch to imagine that she thought the fairies (and by extension the Faun) were misdirecting her when they tried to stop her eating the grapes.

to:

** The food is enchanted -- I'm always surprised by how many people don't get that. enchanted, no? Look at the way she suddenly turns toward the grapes and the camera does a little sweeping pan to follow her gaze, with the Universal Standard Harp of Magical Mischief playing in the soundtrack. GenreBlind, yourself.
** Actually he is right. *** The food is not enchanted, Del Toro Himself says in the audio commentary that she hasn't eaten anything at all since her mother grounded her, there was a scene that didn't make it to the final cut where Ofelia was offered some food but she declined because he thought it would have been very obvious to the viewer.
** I posted this in the main page, but whether it will stay there is anyone's guess. Ofelia's acting like a character in certain fairy tales, which makes sense because she believes herself to be a fairy tale princess. In some fairy tales (but not all,) the main character will fail to listen to advice, or do something they were told specifically not to do -- and in the tales I can remember the reasoning is rather stupid, like not covering up the cage of a bird because it's too pretty (resulting in the bird's singing and alerting everyone in the castle that it's being stolen -- admittedly birds will still make SOME noise when they're covered, but not as much when they aren't!) And yes, if there is a person who is guiding the main character in their quests, they will get VERY pissed off about this. In some cases the tale ends here, but if it doesn't, the main character must do something to redeem themselves in the eyes of their quest-giver. Usually just listening to the instructions and following them to the letter is good enough, though sometimes (like in Ofelia's case) something more extreme is required. So Ofelia is just acting in accordance with the fairy-tale princess that she believes she is -- and in her case, she's the kind of fairy tale character that messes up once in a while, because nobody's perfect. It took me a while to realize this, and I have read *tons* of fairy tales.
** The second time I saw the movie, I You can also read it the movie as a parallel to Ofelia's mother marrying Captain Vidal, and buying into his luxury, power, and prestige, even though she has to know something of what a monster he is. She let greed overrule fear, and Ofelia did the same.
*** ETA: ''Not'' ***''Not'' that it is a bad thing to look out for not only your own welfare, but that of your young daughter, during warfare. Carmen is making a pragmatic choice (or making the best of a bad situation that wasn't much of her choosing,) but I still think her decision is meant to parallel Ofelia's.
** I think it's It's worth noting what happened right before she notices the grapes. The fairies direct her to the wrong door. She ignores them and she gets the dagger. In that instance disobedience turns out to be the right choice. It's not much of a stretch to imagine that she thought the fairies (and by extension the Faun) were misdirecting her when they tried to stop her eating the grapes.



** You don't need to overthink this one. Ofelia is just a little girl and she's witnessed a nightmarish scene that would make any child to run to hide under the bed. Heck, most adults would be terrified too! There's no way Ofelia would be in a state of mind to even realize the Pale Man was not exactly agile.
* There was one thing that bugged this Troper when watching Ofelia's escape-from-the-Pale-Man scene. Why, exactly, did she have to get up on a chair and draw a trapdoor in the ceiling? Wouldn't it have been much easier -- and, more importantly, much faster -- to simply draw another one on the wall?

to:

** You don't need to overthink this one. Ofelia is just a little girl and she's witnessed a nightmarish scene that would make any child to run to hide under the bed. Heck, most adults would be terrified too! There's no way Ofelia would be in a state of mind to even realize the Pale Man was not exactly agile.
* There was one thing that bugged this Troper when watching In Ofelia's escape-from-the-Pale-Man scene. Why, scene, why exactly, did she have to get up on a chair and draw a trapdoor in the ceiling? Wouldn't it have been much easier -- and, more importantly, much faster -- to simply draw another one on the wall?



** About the Spanish mythology: There are several different mythologies, but I can say that the ones in the north have a lot of common points (somethings also shared with [[UsefulNotes/{{Portugal}} Portuguese]] mythology). Fairyland is underground with the realm of the dead. The world is called Mourama in Portuguese mythology, and Alén (lit. "The Beyond") in Galician mythology; in the last one castros and old tombs (or rock formations, actually) are entries to this world. Mouras (think the Sidhe from [[UsefulNotes/{{Ireland}} Irish mythology]]) are the inhabitants of this world and the name 'moura' is thought to mean 'dead.'
** "Fairy-world" = "Underworld" is a spiritual belief that's OlderThanDirt in many cultures, so [[{{Tropers/Sharysa}} This Troper]] assumed that Del Toro just [[{{Mythopoeia}} made up the fairy-tale from scratch.]]

to:

** About the Spanish mythology: There are several different mythologies, but I can say that the ones in the north have a lot of common points (somethings also shared with [[UsefulNotes/{{Portugal}} Portuguese]] mythology). Fairyland is underground with the realm of the dead. The world is called Mourama in Portuguese mythology, and Alén (lit. "The Beyond") in Galician mythology; in the last one castros and old tombs (or rock formations, actually) are entries to this world. Mouras (think the Sidhe from [[UsefulNotes/{{Ireland}} Irish mythology]]) are the inhabitants of this world and the name 'moura' is thought to mean 'dead.'
** "Fairy-world" = "Underworld" is a spiritual belief that's OlderThanDirt in many cultures, so [[{{Tropers/Sharysa}} This Troper]] assumed that Del Toro could've just [[{{Mythopoeia}} made up the fairy-tale from scratch.]]



** She'd likely still wake up the Pale Man anyway. I think stealing from the table would be enough.

to:

** She'd likely still wake up the Pale Man anyway. I think stealing Stealing from the table would probably be enough.



*** I pondered if his "lair" was more his trap. As he doesn't seem the type to do his own painting, so perhaps the fairyland people locked up all the dangerous stuff in there (the knife, whatever else is locked up, etc.) and that includes a dangerous monster as an unwilling guard? The paintings are designed to warn anyone that should be there for whatever reason "don't freakin' mess with that thing!"

to:

*** I pondered if Is his "lair" was more his trap. trap? As he doesn't seem the type to do his own painting, so perhaps the fairyland people locked up all the dangerous stuff in there (the knife, whatever else is locked up, etc.) and that includes a dangerous monster as an unwilling guard? The paintings are designed to warn anyone that should be there for whatever reason "don't freakin' mess with that thing!"



** Personally I always thought the Captain married Ofelia's mom because he ''had'' to marry her -- a one-week affair suddenly got serious when Ofelia's mom revealed she was pregnant, and Vidal decided it was better to start building his legacy now rather than wait 'til the end of the war.
* Okay, I need to ask: What the [[PrecisionFStrike FUCK]] was Ofelia's mother thinking when she married Vidal?! I understand the need for security, but how does marrying the psychotic member of a fascist government grant you that? It just puts a big target on the back of your head, especially when you have to move to a possibly hostile spot in the middle of nowhere!

to:

** Personally I always thought the Seemingly Captain married Ofelia's mom because he ''had'' to marry her -- a one-week affair suddenly got serious when Ofelia's mom revealed she was pregnant, and Vidal decided it was better to start building his legacy now rather than wait 'til the end of the war.
* Okay, I need to ask: What the [[PrecisionFStrike FUCK]] was Ofelia's mother thinking when she married Vidal?! I understand the need for security, but how does marrying the psychotic member of a fascist government grant you that? It just puts a big target on the back of your head, especially when you have to move to a possibly hostile spot in the middle of nowhere!



* Ok, back on the Real World, what the hell was so important about that sawmill? I couldn't see any reason why it was so ''incredibly'' important that there be soldiers there, or even that it was under any kind of direct threat at all until the very end. And if it IS, in fact, a military objective that must be defended at any cost, why does Vidal have his wife and soon to be son living with him in what is, for sake of this specific argument, a war zone? Any why does he host ''dinner parties'' there? I get that Vidal is supremely arrogant, is he also supremely stupid, or is there some context I'm missing here?

to:

* Ok, back on the Real World, what the hell was so important about that sawmill? I couldn't see There aren't any reason discernible reasons why it was so ''incredibly'' important that there be soldiers there, or even that it was under any kind of direct threat at all until the very end. And if it IS, in fact, a military objective that must be defended at any cost, why does Vidal have his wife and soon to be son living with him in what is, for sake of this specific argument, a war zone? Any why does he host ''dinner parties'' there? I get that Vidal is supremely arrogant, is he also supremely stupid, or is there some context I'm missing here?context?



* Why didn't Mercedes poison Vidal's food or kill him in his sleep to passively take him out? I know it makes the story simple but I find it irritating that she doesn't do much other than plot against him indirectly. She obviously wants him for dead, but even when she gets the chance to do some serious damage, she only wounds him on the shoulders rather than going for his vital organs.

to:

* Why didn't Mercedes poison Vidal's food or kill him in his sleep to passively take him out? I know it makes It simplifies the story simple but I find it it's irritating that she doesn't do much other than plot against him indirectly. She obviously wants him for dead, but even when she gets the chance to do some serious damage, she only wounds him on the shoulders rather than going for his vital organs.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Has nothing to do with familiarity with in-universe fiction.


*** Remember that Ophelia is GenreSavvy, as well. The Faun could have meant "just a little blood" -- but he also could have gone the other way and told her that the little bit of blood she gave was not enough. Also, I think this is a testament to her strong character -- the child is only her half-brother, and his father is a vicious murderer. And it would have been very easy to blame the baby for her mother's death. But when the Faun gives her an easy proposition -- causing pain (albeit momentary) to a baby in order to go into the other world -- what answer does she give? "No."

to:

*** Remember that Ophelia is GenreSavvy, as well. The Remember, the Faun could have meant "just a little blood" -- but he also could have gone the other way and told her that the little bit of blood she gave was not enough. Also, I think this is a testament to her strong character -- the child is only her half-brother, and his father is a vicious murderer. And it would have been very easy to blame the baby for her mother's death. But when the Faun gives her an easy proposition -- causing pain (albeit momentary) to a baby in order to go into the other world -- what answer does she give? "No."



** Also add in the fact that the only way out of that room is to go all the way back, climb on a chair, and draw another portal. It's very easy to become cornered in that room. You also have to take into account, these are simple, stupid children. Not some GenreSavvy adventurer.

to:

** Also add in the fact that the only way out of that room is to go all the way back, climb on a chair, and draw another portal. It's very easy to become cornered in that room. You also have to take into account, these are simple, stupid children. Not some GenreSavvy adventurer.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** "Fairy-world" = "Underworld" is a spiritual belief that's OlderThanDirt in many cultures, so [[{{Tropers/Sharysa}} This Troper]] assumed that Del Toro just [[{{Mythopoeia}} made up the fairy-tale from scratch.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** And Vidal is just one officer in the army. Kill him and another will take his place. The rebels meanwhile have the means to take out everyone. As said above, Mercedes doesn't act until her own life is in danger.


Added DiffLines:

** It's likely a visual cue for the audience as well. In the ending of the film they don't have time to introduce this new actress and explain that she's Ofelia's fairy mother. By using the same actress playing Carmen, it automatically tells viewers that it's Ofelia's mother.


Added DiffLines:

** Is it said that the fairies actually know which door it is? If so then it's possibly a SecretTestOfCharacter for Ofelia. Going back to 'blindly following orders' like Vidal, Ofelia as the princess would need to be able to think for herself and not just do everything the fairies told her.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Back to the Pale Man and the locked doors. Why did the Faeries lie to Ofelia about which door she was supposed to open? Or if they didn't know, why tell her any door at all? And how did she know that they told her the wrong one and figure out which door was the right one?

Top