is immortal. TV Tropes does not know time. Terms such as "recently" are meaningless to TV Tropes.
In short, TV Tropes is not static
A common mistake made by many well-intentioned tropers
is to often use the words "recent", "newest", "latest", "as of now" or something synonymous to describe something within their examples or article (trope
or work pages) descriptions. This is usually after some change that shakes the foundation of the work or character. In their zeal, the troper will excitedly state that this is a very recent development, cluing other tropers that the new status is going on right this very minute.
As for instance:
- "In the latest issue of Superman..."
- "The Five-Man Band has recently gotten a new member..."
- "The latest law in California has made it illegal for yuri fans to..."
- "The Doctor just finished a mission to protect..."
- "Rumors about the new The Legend of Zelda game are circulating that..."
- "This movie/series/book came out X years ago..."
- "Right now, this movie is in production..."
While it is understandable, this, unfortunately, is not a good practice.
A form of fan myopia
, this practice assumes that everyone who reads this will automatically be aware of how long ago "recently" was. There are still some examples which describe films, episodes, issues, or volumes from two or more years ago as "recent"
, but if you're not a fan of said work, how will you know whether it's true or not? For all the uninitiated person would know, Captain America
"recently" died or Burn Notice
is still the "hottest new show on USA Network
It also assumes everyone gets media at the same time. People living in a different country than the one a work is released in sometimes have to wait a number of days, months, or years for that work to become legally available where they live. Some tropers will even wait until a series has either established itself
, been cancelled
, or finished up its story
to dig into it on an archive binge
. Thus, what to you is the most recent is, to about half of all readers, either old hat or something that won't happen until next year. Another problem is that "recent" is relative; if a work is decades, or even centuries old, an alteration made as long ago as 1950 can be counted as "recent", but if the work has been around since the 1940s, 1950 will seem much less "recent".
It only creates more trouble for other tropers when they have to remove mentions of the word "recent" after it isn't recent anymore. Or worse, the next troper will add an indented bullet point adding an even more recent update for the situation. So for everyone's sake, please avoid using the word "recent" or anything synonymous in writing your examples. Although TV Tropes is open for anyone to edit, it should not be required
for anyone to come behind another troper and fix their entry.
If it helps, try and pretend that every work, ever, was written all on the same date at some point in the vague past. Don't actually put this in your edits, of course, but use it to help you refrain from slipping in a "recent" without noticing. When talking about yet-to-be-released works or installments of series, it's better to just wait until things have actually made it to the page or screen before adding them in, rather than adding rumors or tentative information that might be contradicted by the time the work is released.
A related phenomenon can occur when linking to websites with constantly changing content, such as webcomics, news sites or blogs. Make sure the URL actually points to the specific item you're referring to, not to the site's main page.note
No examples, please. Especially no "recent