Follow TV Tropes

Live Blogs Opinionated Guide to Avatar: The Last Airbender
Korval2011-06-17 20:09:14

Go To


Avatar: The Last Airbender. What is there to say, really?

A lot, apparently, since I'm going to walk through each episode of the entire 61 episode run. But first, some background.

Avatar: The Last Airbender was a cartoon show that ran for 3 years, from 2005 to 2007. It has become quite popular, particularly among its periphery demographic. It is often praised for having well-written characters, a story arc, good episode-to-episode continuity, and a well-developed world. It's also one of those shows you see on just about every TV Tropes page; it has a large fandom on this site.

It also had a recent film adaptation that was... universally reviled. But we're not talking about that horseshit now.

Each liveblog page will, in general, discuss a particular episode. Two parters will be handled depending on what kind of two-parter it is. If the two parter is really two episodes that chronologically flow from one to the next (ie: one starts immediately after the other, with a Sequel Hook), then I will review them as two episodes. However, if it's really just a single story told in multiple parts, then I will review it as one.

I also intend for this blog to be more analytical than humorous. I'll throw jokes in where I can, but mostly I'm here to point out what works and what doesn't. Because of that, there will be times when talking about something that happened in an episode at length would bog the actual liveblog down too much. In these cases, I will generally extract that section out of the flow of the text and put it in its own section after the episode synopsis. If you're not interested in such analysis, feel free to skip it whenever you see these sections.

Also, I will occasionally have an entire post devoted to some particular aspect of the series up to that point. These are for things that deserve a detailed calling out on, but don't fit into the season introductions. Usually, this is something that covers events from multiple previous episodes. These too are skippable, though you may be missing some interesting analysis.

For those who have not seen this series, there will be some light spoilers for later episodes. I'll minimize them somewhat, in case you're following along for the first time at home. And I won't reveal the most important ones, unless they have been heavily foreshadowed or are otherwise obvious. If I need to analyze a scene in context of something later, I'll generally only present as much as you need to know at that time to understand what I'm saying.

Also, please read the title. This is the opinionated guide to Avatar. You don't have to agree with anything I say here. You should find that most of these opinions do at least have some evidential support, even if you disagree with the conclusion. I welcome discussion where it happens, so if you agree or disagree, feel free to point it out in the comments section.

Lastly, particularly in the early episodes, you may get the impression that I hate this show. I don't. It's a good show, with quality writing and production values. It's well worth your time, and I even own the last two seasons on DVD (NetFlix lets me watch season 1 whenever I want). But that doesn't mean that I will let crap past, and it's hard to argue that the show started on its best foot. If the show does something wrong, I'm going to call it out.

Book 1: Water

It begins...

The show's seasons are called "books." For some reason. I don't get it either; books do not prominently figure prominently within the show's overall theme or general milieu. Indeed, one main character is completely illiterate. In any case, season one is called Book 1: Water.

Normally, for the introduction to a season, I will do a look back at what transpired and a look forward, with some detailed analysis. My goal in such sections is to make some particular point about the show that you may not have thought about.

But, since there is no prior season as of yet, instead, I will go over the general concepts behind this world. That way, I don't have to clog up the episodes themselves with such minutiae.

The world of Avatar: The Last Airbender consists of several cultures, most of them drawn from Asian influences. In this world, there are elemental manipulators known as "benders:" Airbenders, Firebenders, Waterbenders, and Earthbenders. Bending, to varying degrees, relies on movements based on real-world martial arts. So when a firebender throws a karate-like punch, a fireball emerges from his fist.

There are a number of large nations that have arisen around bending forms. The Earth Kingdom occupies the largest landmass in the world. There are two Water Tribes, one in the North Pole and one in the South Pole. The Air Nomads occupied 4 hidden air temples in the north, south, east, and west (four winds. Get it?) of the Earth Kingdom's landmass. And the Fire Nation is on a large island to the west of the Earth Kingdom.

Each nation has a loose basis in some real-world culture. The Earth Kingdom bears a striking resemblance to Imperial China. The Water Tribes are Inuits as they live on the ice. The Air Nomads seem very typically Buddhist monk-ish. And the Fire Nation is some kind of hybrid between Imperial Japan and China with some Indian (India-Indian) influences thrown in.

The nations are also color coded. The Water Tribes wear blue, the Earth Kingdom wears greens, the Fire Nation wears reds, and the Air Nomads wear tans and browns. This extends to just about everyone's dress in these nations; rare is the person who dresses out of color for their nation.

The titular Avatar is a perpetually reincarnated being. He/She is the only individual capable of bending all four elements (or even just more than one), and he/she is charged with defending the world and maintaining the "balance". Exactly what that means is never really explained, but it generally means that each nation stays where it is and doesn't invade another. Or something.

Comments

Ghilz Since: Dec, 1969
Jul 20th 2011 at 10:21:07 AM
the mental hoops it would take for her to realize that someone could follow their trail are... well, about what she would have to do to realize that people can't see through a dust cloud. So while it is consistent, it is still wrong.

Okay, Blind people are not RETARDED. As you seem convinced they are. I know people blind from birth, and they do understand (somewhat) how the world is for people with sight. They do get what a trail is, or that some stuff, like fog or a dust cloud, can impair vision. Why? Because why blind they have grown up with non-blind people who have explained such things to them. A blind person knows what a trail is. They know that if they can deduce a trail by poking/touching/feeling the objects making up the trail, then it's a logical assumption that seeing people can do the same by LOOKING at the objects. Seriously, your insistence on treating the blind like imbeciles who have no idea how things work because apparently they've never talked to anybody in their lives borders on insulting.

Now, I am not saying Toph's a realistic depiction of blind people - she aint, and I agree with your earlier point about the daredevil vision, but complaining because she's not treated as an idiot or alien unaware of the most basic things other people can do is simply wrong. And especially calling it "mental hoops" like she's a chimpanzee trying to learn which button to push to get a banana is kind of dumb. Seriously, stop treating the blind as if they were unaware of anything.

I will, however, grant that it really should have been Sokka who thought of the hair as a trail first. And Toph sure as hell shouldn't have been anywhere near the first to do so.
Korval Since: Dec, 1969
Jul 21st 2011 at 12:32:24 AM
"Okay, Blind people are not RETARDED."

I'm curious as to how you missed the very next sentence, where I said, "I'm willing to buy that Toph could have figured it out." So I don't see what it is that you're taking issue with, since we seem to agree on the point in question.

I neither said nor implied that blind people were "RETARDED".

"And especially calling it "mental hoops" like she's a chimpanzee trying to learn which button to push to get a banana is kind of dumb."

I would like to remind you that this is the Internet and you are only reading the text I wrote. So you should keep in mind that what you gather from what I wrote may not have been what was intended, due to lack of vocal inflections and so forth.

Keeping that in mind, I have absolutely no idea where you're getting the mental image of chimpanzees from the phrase "mental hoops". That's the kind of term I use to describe solving a complex problem in programming or Space Chem or something. You have to keep a lot of facts active in your brain at once and connect all the pieces. That's mental exercise. Jumping through hoops. Only mentally.

I'm just not seeing the connection between chimps and mental hoops.
98.92.72.134 Since: Dec, 1969
Jul 22nd 2011 at 3:20:54 PM
This "opinionated" guide is getting as painful to read as that old liveblog for Buffy The Vampire Slayer. The sheer amount of nitpicking over the writing and animation and the griping about every single last detail that that plot and characters do is just unbearable. You are flat-out LOOKING for everything you can to pan the show and prove that it's "not as great as everyone says". Seriously, cut this Serious Business approach and just enjoy the damn thing!
Korval Since: Dec, 1969
Jul 22nd 2011 at 11:02:32 PM
Yes, God forbid someone actually examine something. No, we should simply accept anything that's given to us and not think critically about it.

I noticed that you didn't actually offer a defense for series; you didn't defend this particular episode. You didn't address any of the points I made. All you said is that I shouldn't be looking for problems, that the mere act of pointing out what is there is somehow invalid.

I'm not here to unconditionally praise something. I'm here to analyze it. To take it apart, put it under a microscope and see what makes it tick.

Oh, and I am enjoying "the damn thing", thank you very much. I learned quite a bit about the show, both positive and negative, in the construction of this piece. I'm having fun, both in praising and damning it.

As for this particular episode, as I said, the first time I watched it, I loved it. But the second time, all the problems really revealed themselves. Why should I ignore them? If you want to ignore the problems, that's fine. If you don't see them as problems, that's also fine. But don't act like they aren't there or that it's somehow wrong or unfair to show something for exactly what it is.
Emperordaein Since: Dec, 1969
Jul 25th 2011 at 5:36:39 AM
I can get by your reasoning Korval, and I won't say that you are wrong in your approach. You make ALOT of good points in your analysis, and while there are several opinions on characters and some arguments I don't agree with at all, you still do a good job in the analysis.

Actually, I kind of have similar feelings to a degree with my favourite series, Fullmetal Alchemist (Which I consider in places to be what Avatar would be like if it took it's darkness to extremities). I love it to pieces, yet I can still find quite a few flaws in it, some more prevalent than others. I actually outlined them in my Liveblog (Which I am kinda on the fence about continuing. And I actually did plan to have a large tangent to why Al's Heroic BSOD after Lab 5 was stupid in the Manga, as well as why I think Mei Chang was a wasted character).

However, the thing is, I don't like lingering on these flaws that get uncovered. I feel that getting too hooked up on them spoils my enjoyment of the series. I see them and make mention of them, but I just put them in footnotes.
Kalaong Since: Dec, 1969
Feb 12th 2012 at 3:38:02 PM
As for Toph's plot-breaking abilities, ahem: At this point, she is a DUELIST, not a warrior.

Knock out the road? Why would she think to do that when she's used to waiting for a challenger to attack her?

She's the one who realizes Appa's fur is drawing attention? She's the one who's used to picking apart an opponent's strategies - and it takes her three tries to figure this puzzler out.

Bending a stream of sand at Azula? THEY ARE IN THE MIDDLE OF A DESERT. Was she supposed to bend an adobe hut off its foundations and throw THAT? You'd really complain about that.

Until the end of this episode, they're still the Gaang +1 - she's still trying to feel herself and the others out.
Codafett Since: Dec, 1969
Dec 5th 2013 at 3:30:18 PM
You know, for a guy that complains about padding and pacing, your ideal version of this show and all your complaints being resolved would lead to the most overly serious, rushed and passionless show.
Bourne~Endeavor Since: Dec, 1969
Aug 7th 2015 at 11:41:31 PM
"Yes, God forbid someone actually examine something. No, we should simply accept anything that's given to us and not think critically about it."

Kind of ironic, considering someone is ''examining' your synopsis and now you've gotten pissy about it. Your entire examination is essentially whining at nearly every aspect of the show. Depictions of humor or character interactions are cited as "non-humor" or "padding", yet you demonstrate a complete lack of consistency when you argue the show doesn't develop characters.

Perhaps if you stopped attempting to find fault in every little thing, you would notice all those instances of padding do precisely what you're asking.
Top