Created By: Luc on April 11, 2011 Last Edited By: Luc on April 21, 2011

Trope Enjoyment Loophole

Name Space:
Page Type:
This is what happens when a trope normally is a Pet-Peeve Trope, but one particular example doesn't trigger the usual Berserk Button. (Or the reverse, when a Favorite Trope is done in such a way as to hit said Button.)

Why? Well, for the non-annoying example of a Pet-Peeve Trope case (which is the one we'll be providing examples for) there are a few possibilities:
  • It could be because the justification is actually logical (there's a Record Needle Scratch in the trailer, but it's a movie about an actual Vinyl record shop in the 60s)
  • It could be because the subtext that's normally present in the trope is avoided (yes, he's gay and he dies violently, but the two clearly have nothing to do with one another)
  • It could be because the context requires the trope (given that the cast of this slasher film was entirely African-American, Black Dude Dies First is sorta a given)
  • It could be because the trope is used in a very understated way (yes, that character is very clearly the author's pet, but he's only on screen for maybe two scenes per episode at most)
  • It could be that it's being used in a sufficiently unusual way (it's not Rape as Comedy; it's Rape as Drama being played by the Rapist as comedy)
  • It could be a case of They Plotted a Perfectly Good Waste (we're supposed to find the wangsty teenager annoying, so that we understand when the Hero finally starts yelling at him)
  • It could be some species of deconstruction of the trope.

No examples, please. Given that this is an Audience Reaction derived from another Audience Reaction, specific examples in the main page would be problematic.
Community Feedback Replies: 6
  • April 15, 2011
  • April 15, 2011
    • #2 is trope averted. If the gay character dies violently and there is some room for thinking he died violently because he was gay, then later it turns out that nope, it had nothing to do with it - then it would be subverted.
  • April 16, 2011
    Peccantis: Do you have another suggestion for the "Avoided Unfortunate Implications" case?

    Edit: Maybe: (He is a British Lord raised by a native tribe, but he repeatedly claims to not be as good a hunter as most of the men of his adopted tribe, and this is (mostly) borne out by what we see; he's still good enough to beat the bad guys, though.)
  • April 18, 2011
    Anybody mind if I launch this Friday?
  • April 20, 2011
    48 hour launch warning.
  • April 21, 2011
    Final bump before launch.