Launching Fri. Apr. 30
- The Sliding Scale of Faithfulness vs Finances
When creating a movie from a story already well-known in another medium, those making it are often faced with a crippling dilemma. How true can we stay to the source material without risking a failure at the box office? It can be a very hard call for a director. On the one hand, Fan Dumb
will cry "Ruined FOREVER
" should he change one iota of the source material, and he may find himself a victim of the fandom's ire from then on
. On the other hand, not
changing a thing can result in either a very poorly-made movie or one that relies so heavily on the source material that people unfamiliar with the work will be completely lost.
The scale runs something like this:
- 5. Identical Adaptation: a movie in which next to nothing is changed. These rarely fare well outside the established Fandom.
- 4. Near-Identical Adaptation: a movie that changes the material just enough to gain a PG rating or be of reasonable length. Usually rereleased with a Director's Cut.
- 3. Pragmatic Adaptation: probably the most ideal rating. A movie that manages to capture the spirit of the original work, while at the same time, embracing the new medium. These are generally big hits.
- 2. Recognizable Adaptation: still bares resemblence to its source material
- 1. In Name Only: Shares only the name and possibly the main characters
The scale, however, is not set in stone, and often times, there is overlap. Also, Tropes Are Not Bad
as any movie in any of these categories (except possibly 0) can become a great success. However, the further a movie falls from the center, the less likely that is.
This trope almost always applies to movies, because when making a book, tv show, or comic of a movie, there is a lot more room to work with. See The Problem with Licensed Games
for the video game equivalent.