Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / WhoCensoredRogerRabbit

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AnimationAgeGhetto: Gary Wolf had trouble getting ''Who Censored Roger Rabbit?'' published because of this, see WhatDoYouMeanItsNotForKids below.

to:

* AnimationAgeGhetto: Gary Wolf had trouble getting ''Who Censored Roger Rabbit?'' published because of this, see WhatDoYouMeanItsNotForKids below. One wonders what Creator/RalphBakshi would have done, since ''his'' specialty was edgy urban cartoons.

Added: 857

Changed: 1041

Removed: 436

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy: Unlike the film, every single character in the main cast is unlikable. Eddie is a cynical bigot, Roger is [[spoiler:a murderer who planned to frame Eddie]], Jessica is a philandering porn star who [[spoiler:never loved Roger at all]]. Carol is one of the few likeable characters, though even she is a murder suspect. However, it all goes part-and-parcel with being a [[TheForties 40's]]-style potboiler.



* WhatDoYouMeanItsNotForKids: Though [[Film/WhoFramedRogerRabbit the film]] was not intended for children (at least, not entirely) and thus has a good deal of profanity and risque humor in it, it's still a fairly family-friendly ouvre in the vein of previous [[TheEighties eighties]] hits such as ''Franchise/IndianaJones'' and ''Film/BackToTheFuture''. These books, however, are most certainly not for children, being full of sex, violence, oodles and oodles of betrayal (seriously, take a shot every time someone gets back-stabbed), and featuring a racist bigot as a main character (but to be fair, he does chill out and become more tolerant through the course of his adventures). The original 1985 plans for the film were faithful to the book, but new leadership at Disney made it go through over ''forty'' revisions before getting the final product.

to:

* TooBleakStoppedCaring: Unlike the film, every single character in the main cast is unlikable. Eddie is a cynical bigot, Roger is [[spoiler:a murderer who planned to frame Eddie]], Jessica is a philandering porn star who [[spoiler:never loved Roger at all]]. Carol is one of the few likeable characters, though even she is a murder suspect. However, it all goes part-and-parcel with being a [[TheForties 40's]]-style potboiler.
* WhatDoYouMeanItsNotForKids: Though [[Film/WhoFramedRogerRabbit the film]] was not intended for children (at least, not entirely) and thus has a good deal of profanity and risque humor in it, it's still a fairly family-friendly ouvre in the vein of previous [[TheEighties eighties]] hits such as ''Franchise/IndianaJones'' and ''Film/BackToTheFuture''. These books, however, are most certainly not for children, being full of sex, violence, oodles and oodles of betrayal (seriously, take a shot every time someone gets back-stabbed), and featuring a racist bigot as a main character (but to be fair, he does chill out and become more tolerant through the course of his adventures). The original 1985 plans for the film were faithful to the book, but new leadership at Disney made it go through over ''forty'' revisions before getting the final product.product.

----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy: Unlike the film, every single character in the main cast is unlikable. Eddie is a cynical bigot, Roger is [[spoiler:a murderer who planned to frame Eddie]], Jessica is a philandering porn star who [[spoiler:never loved Roger at all]]. Carol is one of the few likeable characters, though even she is a murder suspect. However, it all goes part-and-parcel with being a TheForties-style potboiler.

to:

* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy: Unlike the film, every single character in the main cast is unlikable. Eddie is a cynical bigot, Roger is [[spoiler:a murderer who planned to frame Eddie]], Jessica is a philandering porn star who [[spoiler:never loved Roger at all]]. Carol is one of the few likeable characters, though even she is a murder suspect. However, it all goes part-and-parcel with being a TheForties-style [[TheForties 40's]]-style potboiler.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy: Unlike the film, every single characters in the main cast are unlikable. Eddie is a cynical bigot, Roger is [[spoiler:a murderer who planned to frame Eddie]], Jessica is a philandering porn star who [[spoiler:never loved Roger at all]]. Carol is one of the few likeable characters, though even she is a murder suspect. However, it all goes part-and-parcel with being a TheForties-style potboiler.

to:

* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy: Unlike the film, every single characters character in the main cast are is unlikable. Eddie is a cynical bigot, Roger is [[spoiler:a murderer who planned to frame Eddie]], Jessica is a philandering porn star who [[spoiler:never loved Roger at all]]. Carol is one of the few likeable characters, though even she is a murder suspect. However, it all goes part-and-parcel with being a TheForties-style potboiler.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WhatDoYouMeanItsNotForKids: Though [[Film/WhoFramedRogerRabbit the film]] was not intended for children and thus has a good deal of profanity and risque humor in it, it's still a fairly family-friendly ouvre in the vein of previous [[TheEighties eighties]] hits such as ''Franchise/IndianaJones'' and ''Film/BackToTheFuture''. These books, however, are most certainly not for children, being full of sex, violence, oodles and oodles of betrayal (seriously, take a shot every time someone gets back-stabbed), and featuring a racist bigot as a main character (but to be fair, he does chill out and become more tolerant through the course of his adventures). The original 1985 plans for the film were faithful to the book, but new leadership at Disney made it go through over ''forty'' revisions before getting the final product.

to:

* WhatDoYouMeanItsNotForKids: Though [[Film/WhoFramedRogerRabbit the film]] was not intended for children (at least, not entirely) and thus has a good deal of profanity and risque humor in it, it's still a fairly family-friendly ouvre in the vein of previous [[TheEighties eighties]] hits such as ''Franchise/IndianaJones'' and ''Film/BackToTheFuture''. These books, however, are most certainly not for children, being full of sex, violence, oodles and oodles of betrayal (seriously, take a shot every time someone gets back-stabbed), and featuring a racist bigot as a main character (but to be fair, he does chill out and become more tolerant through the course of his adventures). The original 1985 plans for the film were faithful to the book, but new leadership at Disney made it go through over ''forty'' revisions before getting the final product.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WhatDoYouMeanItsNotForKids: Though [[Film/WhoFramedRogerRabbit the film]] was not intended for children and thus has a good deal of profanity and risque humor in it, it's still a fairly family-friendly ouvre in the vein of previous [[TheEighties eighties]] hits such as ''Franchise/IndianaJones'' and ''Film/BackToTheFuture''. These books, however, are most certainly not for children, being full of sex, violence, oodles and oodles of betrayal (seriously, take a shot every time someone gets back-stabbed), and featuring a racist bigot as a main character (but to be fair, he does chill out and become more tolerant through the course of his adventures). The original 1985 plans for the film were faithful to the book, but new leadership at Disney made it go through over ''forty revisions before getting the final product.

to:

* WhatDoYouMeanItsNotForKids: Though [[Film/WhoFramedRogerRabbit the film]] was not intended for children and thus has a good deal of profanity and risque humor in it, it's still a fairly family-friendly ouvre in the vein of previous [[TheEighties eighties]] hits such as ''Franchise/IndianaJones'' and ''Film/BackToTheFuture''. These books, however, are most certainly not for children, being full of sex, violence, oodles and oodles of betrayal (seriously, take a shot every time someone gets back-stabbed), and featuring a racist bigot as a main character (but to be fair, he does chill out and become more tolerant through the course of his adventures). The original 1985 plans for the film were faithful to the book, but new leadership at Disney made it go through over ''forty ''forty'' revisions before getting the final product.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WhatDoYouMeanItsNotForKids: Though [[Film/WhoFramedRogerRabbit the film]] was not intended for children and thus has a good deal of profanity and risque humor in it, it's still a fairly family-friendly ouvre in the vein of previous [[TheEighties eighties]] hits such as ''Franchise/IndianaJones'' and ''Film/BackToTheFuture''. These books, however, are most certainly not for children, being full of sex, violence, oodles and oodles of betrayal (seriously, take a shot every time someone gets back-stabbed), and featuring a racist bigot as a main character (but to be fair, he does chill out and become more tolerant through the course of his adventures). The original 1985 plans for the film was faithful to the book, but new leadership at Disney made it go through over ''forty revisions before getting the final product.

to:

* WhatDoYouMeanItsNotForKids: Though [[Film/WhoFramedRogerRabbit the film]] was not intended for children and thus has a good deal of profanity and risque humor in it, it's still a fairly family-friendly ouvre in the vein of previous [[TheEighties eighties]] hits such as ''Franchise/IndianaJones'' and ''Film/BackToTheFuture''. These books, however, are most certainly not for children, being full of sex, violence, oodles and oodles of betrayal (seriously, take a shot every time someone gets back-stabbed), and featuring a racist bigot as a main character (but to be fair, he does chill out and become more tolerant through the course of his adventures). The original 1985 plans for the film was were faithful to the book, but new leadership at Disney made it go through over ''forty revisions before getting the final product.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MindRape:[[spoiler: Jessica]] only falls in love with [[spoiler: Roger]] because he wished for it within earshot of a jerkass genie. And she returns to her original life after the magic wears off, showing she never loved him of her own accord. Making their marriage actual (if unwitting) rape on [[spoiler: Roger’s]] part. However, Roger refuses to believe it, and makes Eddie promise to protect her even if she really did murder him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WhatDoYouMeanItsNotForKids: Though [[Film/WhoFramedRogerRabbit the film]] was not intended for children and thus has a good deal of profanity and risque humor in it, it's still a fairly family-friendly ouvre in the vein of previous [[TheEighties eighties]] hits such as ''Franchise/IndianaJones'' and ''Film/BackToTheFuture''. These books, however, are most certainly not for children, being full of sex, violence, oodles and oodles of betrayal (seriously, take a shot every time someone gets back-stabbed), and featuring a racist bigot as a main character (but to be fair, he does chill out and become more tolerant through the course of his adventures). Indeed, Mr. Wolf had difficulties selling this book to publishers because many assumed it was an extremely ill-conceived children's novel simply because [[AnimationAgeGhetto there were cartoons in the subject matter]].

to:

* WhatDoYouMeanItsNotForKids: Though [[Film/WhoFramedRogerRabbit the film]] was not intended for children and thus has a good deal of profanity and risque humor in it, it's still a fairly family-friendly ouvre in the vein of previous [[TheEighties eighties]] hits such as ''Franchise/IndianaJones'' and ''Film/BackToTheFuture''. These books, however, are most certainly not for children, being full of sex, violence, oodles and oodles of betrayal (seriously, take a shot every time someone gets back-stabbed), and featuring a racist bigot as a main character (but to be fair, he does chill out and become more tolerant through the course of his adventures). Indeed, Mr. Wolf had difficulties selling this book to publishers because many assumed it The original 1985 plans for the film was an extremely ill-conceived children's novel simply because [[AnimationAgeGhetto there were cartoons in faithful to the subject matter]].book, but new leadership at Disney made it go through over ''forty revisions before getting the final product.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MindRape:[[spoiler: Jessica]] only falls in love with [[spoiler: Roger]] because he wished for it within earshot of a jerkass genie. And she returns to her original life after the magic wears off, showing she never loved him of her own accord. Making their marriage actual (if unwitting) rape on [[spoiler: Roger’s]] part.

to:

* MindRape:[[spoiler: Jessica]] only falls in love with [[spoiler: Roger]] because he wished for it within earshot of a jerkass genie. And she returns to her original life after the magic wears off, showing she never loved him of her own accord. Making their marriage actual (if unwitting) rape on [[spoiler: Roger’s]] part. However, Roger refuses to believe it, and makes Eddie promise to protect her even if she really did murder him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MindRape:[[spoiler: Jessica]] only falls in love with [[spoiler: Roger]] because [[spoiler: Roger]] wished for it within earshot of a jerkass genie. And she returns to her original life after the magic wears off, showing she never loved him of her own accord. Making their marriage actual (if unwitting) rape on [[spoiler: Roger’s]] part.

to:

* MindRape:[[spoiler: Jessica]] only falls in love with [[spoiler: Roger]] because [[spoiler: Roger]] he wished for it within earshot of a jerkass genie. And she returns to her original life after the magic wears off, showing she never loved him of her own accord. Making their marriage actual (if unwitting) rape on [[spoiler: Roger’s]] part.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Mindrape:[[spoiler: Jessica]] only falls in love with [[spoiler: Roger]] because [[spoiler: Roger]] wished for it within earshot of a jerkass genie. And she returns to her original life after the magic wears off, showing she never loved him of her own accord. Making their marriage actual (if unwitting) rape on [[spoiler: Roger’s]] part.

to:

* Mindrape:[[spoiler: MindRape:[[spoiler: Jessica]] only falls in love with [[spoiler: Roger]] because [[spoiler: Roger]] wished for it within earshot of a jerkass genie. And she returns to her original life after the magic wears off, showing she never loved him of her own accord. Making their marriage actual (if unwitting) rape on [[spoiler: Roger’s]] part.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Mindrape:[[spoiler: Jessica]] only falls in love with [[spoiler: Roger]] because [[spoiler: Roger]] wished for it within earshot of a jerkass genie. And she returns to her original life after the magic wears off, showing she never loved him of her own accord. Making their marriage actual (if unwitting) rape on [[spoiler: Roger’s]] part.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy: Unlike the film, every single characters in the main cast are unlikable. Eddie is a cynical bigot, Roger is [[spoiler:a murderer who planned to frame Eddie]], Jessica is a philandering porn star who [[spoiler:never loved Roger at all]]. Carol is one of the few likeable characters, though even she is a murder suspect. However, it all goes part-and-parcel with being a TheForties-style PotBoiler.

to:

* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy: Unlike the film, every single characters in the main cast are unlikable. Eddie is a cynical bigot, Roger is [[spoiler:a murderer who planned to frame Eddie]], Jessica is a philandering porn star who [[spoiler:never loved Roger at all]]. Carol is one of the few likeable characters, though even she is a murder suspect. However, it all goes part-and-parcel with being a TheForties-style PotBoiler.potboiler.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy: Unlike the film, every single characters in the main cast are unlikable. Eddie is a cynical bigot, Roger is [[spoiler:a murderer who planned to frame Eddie]], Jessica is a philandering porn star who [[spoiler:never loved Roger at all]]. It made you wish that Eddie [[spoiler:had let Roger to admit for his crime]].

to:

* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy: Unlike the film, every single characters in the main cast are unlikable. Eddie is a cynical bigot, Roger is [[spoiler:a murderer who planned to frame Eddie]], Jessica is a philandering porn star who [[spoiler:never loved Roger at all]]. It made you wish that Eddie [[spoiler:had let Roger to admit for his crime]].Carol is one of the few likeable characters, though even she is a murder suspect. However, it all goes part-and-parcel with being a TheForties-style PotBoiler.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy: Unlike the film, every single characters in the main cast are unlikable. Eddie is a cynical bigot, Roger is [[spoiler:a murderer who planned to frame Eddie]], Jessica is a philandering porn star who [[spoiler:never loved Roger at all]]. It made you wish that Eddie [[spoiler:had let Roger to admit for his crime]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AssPull: Eddie literally [[spoiler: WISHES for conclusive proof (even though it's fake) that an already dead man]] was the sole murderer. Fortunately, the proof fits the crime - in fact, it's the ''only'' explanation that would work that didn't have Roger being the murderer.

to:

* AssPull: Eddie literally [[spoiler: WISHES for conclusive proof (even though it's fake) that an already dead man]] was the sole murderer. Fortunately, the proof fits the crime - in fact, it's the ''only'' explanation that would work that didn't have Roger being the murderer. To be fair, however, Eddie already [[spoiler: knew Roger was the murderer, and needed physical proof of the only thing that could get Roger off the hook.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AssPull: Eddie litterally [[spoiler: WISHES for conclusive proof (even though it's fake) that an already dead man]] was the sole murderer. Fortunately, the proof fits the crime - in fact, it's the ''only'' explanation that would work that didn't have Roger being the murderer.

to:

* AssPull: Eddie litterally literally [[spoiler: WISHES for conclusive proof (even though it's fake) that an already dead man]] was the sole murderer. Fortunately, the proof fits the crime - in fact, it's the ''only'' explanation that would work that didn't have Roger being the murderer.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AssPull: Eddie litterally [[spoiler: WISHES for conclusive proof (even though it's fake) that an already dead man]] was the sole murderer.

to:

* AssPull: Eddie litterally [[spoiler: WISHES for conclusive proof (even though it's fake) that an already dead man]] was the sole murderer. Fortunately, the proof fits the crime - in fact, it's the ''only'' explanation that would work that didn't have Roger being the murderer.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Alas Poor Villain is being moved back to Main. Examples that don\'t describe the moment or are purely editor opinion are being deleted.


* AlasPoorVillain

Changed: 24

Removed: 95

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AssPull: Eddie litterally [[spoiler: WISHES for conclusive proof that an already dead man]] was the sole murderer.
** Although at that point he had it figured out, so he's really just saving his own reputation.

to:

* AssPull: Eddie litterally [[spoiler: WISHES for conclusive proof (even though it's fake) that an already dead man]] was the sole murderer.
** Although at that point he had it figured out, so he's really just saving his own reputation.
murderer.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Although at that point he had it figured out, so he's really just saving his own reputation.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AssPull: Eddie litterally [[spoiler: WISHES for conclusive proof that an already dead man was the]] sole murderer, and that dead man (who was also murdered) commited suicide.

to:

* AssPull: Eddie litterally [[spoiler: WISHES for conclusive proof that an already dead man man]] was the]] the sole murderer, and that dead man (who was also murdered) commited suicide.murderer.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AssPull: Eddie litterally [[spoiler: WISHES for conclusive proof that an already dead man was the]] sole murderer, and that dead man (who was also murdered) commited suicide.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WhatDoYouMeanItsNotForKids: Though [[Film/WhoFramedRogerRabbit the film]] was not intended for children and thus has a good deal of profanity and risque humor in it, it's still a fairly family-friendly ouvre in the vein of previous [[TheEighties eighties]] hits such as ''IndianaJones'' and ''BackToTheFuture''. These books, however, are most certainly not for children, being full of sex, violence, oodles and oodles of betrayal (seriously, take a shot every time someone gets back-stabbed), and featuring a racist bigot as a main character (but to be fair, he does chill out and become more tolerant through the course of his adventures). Indeed, Mr. Wolf had difficulties selling this book to publishers because many assumed it was an extremely ill-conceived children's novel simply because [[AnimationAgeGhetto there were cartoons in the subject matter]].

to:

* WhatDoYouMeanItsNotForKids: Though [[Film/WhoFramedRogerRabbit the film]] was not intended for children and thus has a good deal of profanity and risque humor in it, it's still a fairly family-friendly ouvre in the vein of previous [[TheEighties eighties]] hits such as ''IndianaJones'' ''Franchise/IndianaJones'' and ''BackToTheFuture''.''Film/BackToTheFuture''. These books, however, are most certainly not for children, being full of sex, violence, oodles and oodles of betrayal (seriously, take a shot every time someone gets back-stabbed), and featuring a racist bigot as a main character (but to be fair, he does chill out and become more tolerant through the course of his adventures). Indeed, Mr. Wolf had difficulties selling this book to publishers because many assumed it was an extremely ill-conceived children's novel simply because [[AnimationAgeGhetto there were cartoons in the subject matter]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Namespace fix


* WhatDoYouMeanItsNotForKids: Though [[WhoFramedRogerRabbit the film]] was not intended for children and thus has a good deal of profanity and risque humor in it, it's still a fairly family-friendly ouvre in the vein of previous [[TheEighties eighties]] hits such as ''IndianaJones'' and ''BackToTheFuture''. These books, however, are most certainly not for children, being full of sex, violence, oodles and oodles of betrayal (seriously, take a shot every time someone gets back-stabbed), and featuring a racist bigot as a main character (but to be fair, he does chill out and become more tolerant through the course of his adventures). Indeed, Mr. Wolf had difficulties selling this book to publishers because many assumed it was an extremely ill-conceived children's novel simply because [[AnimationAgeGhetto there were cartoons in the subject matter]].

to:

* WhatDoYouMeanItsNotForKids: Though [[WhoFramedRogerRabbit [[Film/WhoFramedRogerRabbit the film]] was not intended for children and thus has a good deal of profanity and risque humor in it, it's still a fairly family-friendly ouvre in the vein of previous [[TheEighties eighties]] hits such as ''IndianaJones'' and ''BackToTheFuture''. These books, however, are most certainly not for children, being full of sex, violence, oodles and oodles of betrayal (seriously, take a shot every time someone gets back-stabbed), and featuring a racist bigot as a main character (but to be fair, he does chill out and become more tolerant through the course of his adventures). Indeed, Mr. Wolf had difficulties selling this book to publishers because many assumed it was an extremely ill-conceived children's novel simply because [[AnimationAgeGhetto there were cartoons in the subject matter]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AlasPoorVillain

Added: 856

Changed: 18

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AnimationAgeGhetto: Gary Wolf had trouble getting ''Who Censored Roger Rabbit?'' published because of this, see WhatDoYouMeanItsNotForKids in the Main tab.

to:

* AnimationAgeGhetto: Gary Wolf had trouble getting ''Who Censored Roger Rabbit?'' published because of this, see WhatDoYouMeanItsNotForKids in the Main tab.below.



-->[[spoiler: I looked up at the sky. It was one of those rare days when the Earth revolves a little faster and shoos away the smog. You could see a long way, but not half as far as Roger had gone.]]

to:

-->[[spoiler: I looked up at the sky. It was one of those rare days when the Earth revolves a little faster and shoos away the smog. You could see a long way, but not half as far as Roger had gone.]]]]
* WhatDoYouMeanItsNotForKids: Though [[WhoFramedRogerRabbit the film]] was not intended for children and thus has a good deal of profanity and risque humor in it, it's still a fairly family-friendly ouvre in the vein of previous [[TheEighties eighties]] hits such as ''IndianaJones'' and ''BackToTheFuture''. These books, however, are most certainly not for children, being full of sex, violence, oodles and oodles of betrayal (seriously, take a shot every time someone gets back-stabbed), and featuring a racist bigot as a main character (but to be fair, he does chill out and become more tolerant through the course of his adventures). Indeed, Mr. Wolf had difficulties selling this book to publishers because many assumed it was an extremely ill-conceived children's novel simply because [[AnimationAgeGhetto there were cartoons in the subject matter]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AnimationAgeGhetto: Gary Wolf had trouble getting ''Who Censored Roger Rabbit?'' published because of this, see WhatDoYouMeanItsNotForKids in the Main tab.

Top