Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* Sugarwiki/AwesomeMusic: The film's more action-based tone has Music/MXPX perform a ''hardcore rock cover'' of the classic theme song. Not anyone's cup of tea, but it certainly goes well with Scooby taking on the Tar Monster.
to:
* Sugarwiki/AwesomeMusic: The film's more action-based tone has Music/MXPX Music/{{MXPX}} perform a ''hardcore rock cover'' of the classic theme song. Not anyone's cup of tea, but it certainly goes well with Scooby taking on the Tar Monster.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 40 (click to see context) from:
** The Girl Scout who offers to sell Shaggy and Scooby a box of cookies after being trapped by Wickles' security system along with the gang barely has twenty seconds of screen time. However, she's utterly hilarious and memorable in those twenty seconds.
to:
** The Girl Scout who offers to sell Shaggy and Scooby a box of cookies after being trapped by Wickles' security system along with the gang barely has twenty seconds of screen time. However, she's utterly hilarious hilarious, adorable and memorable in those twenty seconds.
Changed line(s) 45 (click to see context) from:
** The scene where Fred is filmed saying "I think Coolsville sucks" and it gets broadcasted out of context is held up today as pretty much the go-to example of how ManipulativeEditing in the news works.
to:
** The scene where Fred is filmed saying "I think Coolsville sucks" and it gets broadcasted out of context is held up today as pretty much the go-to example of how ManipulativeEditing in the news works.works, to the point it became one of the sequel's iconic memes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 27 (click to see context) from:
* ImprovedSecondAttempt: This movie took a better approach to giving Velma a love interest than [[Film/ScoobyDoo2002 previous movie]] did. Last time, he only served as a SatelliteLoveInterest to give Velma a reason to give Scrappy some exposition. This time, the new love interest, museum curator Patrick, is shown to have a lot in common with Velma and compounds this with more development of Velma being interested in him, but insecure he won't like her back. Later in the movie, she's also worried about getting too close to him when she finds circumstantial evidence implying that he's the Evil Masked Figure. Her insecurity also helps Shaggy and Scooby break out of the belief that they're {{Idiot Houdini}}s and face off against the monsters.
to:
* ImprovedSecondAttempt: ImprovedSecondAttempt:
** This movie took a better approach to giving Velma a love interest than [[Film/ScoobyDoo2002 previous movie]] did. Last time, he only served as a SatelliteLoveInterest to give Velma a reason to give Scrappy some exposition. This time, the new love interest, museum curator Patrick, is shown to have a lot in common with Velma and compounds this with more development of Velma being interested in him, but insecure he won't like her back. Later in the movie, she's also worried about getting too close to him when she finds circumstantial evidence implying that he's the Evil Masked Figure. Her insecurity also helps Shaggy and Scooby break out of the belief that they're {{Idiot Houdini}}s and face off against the monsters.
** Much like [[Film/ScoobyDoo2002 the last movie]], the villain is an old character from the original. While like the previous time, they had some noticeable inaccuracies, they made Jonathan Jacobo devoid of sympathy and show that his revenge was absolutely unjustified. The presence of The Faux Ghost shows he could've made something better of himself, had he not been consumed by his own hatred.
** This movie took a better approach to giving Velma a love interest than [[Film/ScoobyDoo2002 previous movie]] did. Last time, he only served as a SatelliteLoveInterest to give Velma a reason to give Scrappy some exposition. This time, the new love interest, museum curator Patrick, is shown to have a lot in common with Velma and compounds this with more development of Velma being interested in him, but insecure he won't like her back. Later in the movie, she's also worried about getting too close to him when she finds circumstantial evidence implying that he's the Evil Masked Figure. Her insecurity also helps Shaggy and Scooby break out of the belief that they're {{Idiot Houdini}}s and face off against the monsters.
** Much like [[Film/ScoobyDoo2002 the last movie]], the villain is an old character from the original. While like the previous time, they had some noticeable inaccuracies, they made Jonathan Jacobo devoid of sympathy and show that his revenge was absolutely unjustified. The presence of The Faux Ghost shows he could've made something better of himself, had he not been consumed by his own hatred.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* AssPull: While the identity of the BigBad is obvious from the start, [[spoiler: Ned the cameraman being his accomplice came seemingly out of nowhere due to his [[CluelessMystery lack of screentime that would have painted him as such]].]]
to:
* AssPull: While the identity of the BigBad is obvious from the start, [[spoiler: Ned [[spoiler:Ned the cameraman being his accomplice came seemingly out of nowhere due to his [[CluelessMystery lack of screentime that would have painted him as such]].]]
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* CaptainObviousReveal: [[spoiler: Creator/AliciaSilverstone's character Heather Jasper-Howe being the BigBad. You have to admit, a famous celebrity playing a supporting character in a ''Scooby-Doo'' movie would definitely tip a few people off]].
to:
* CaptainObviousReveal: [[spoiler: Creator/AliciaSilverstone's [[spoiler:Creator/AliciaSilverstone's character Heather Jasper-Howe being the BigBad. You have to admit, a famous celebrity playing a supporting character in a ''Scooby-Doo'' movie would definitely tip a few people off]].
Changed line(s) 32 (click to see context) from:
* {{Narm}}: Daphne’s “fight” against the 10,000 Volt Ghost is too ridiculous to take seriously. After telling him to “taste the pain”, she ''[[TooDumbToLive kicks him head on]]''. Unsurprisingly, she gets flung into the air like a ragdoll and lands straight in the dirt.
to:
* {{Narm}}: Daphne’s “fight” Daphne's "fight" against the 10,000 Volt Ghost is too ridiculous to take seriously. After telling him to “taste "taste the pain”, pain", she ''[[TooDumbToLive kicks him head on]]''. Unsurprisingly, she gets flung into the air like a ragdoll and lands straight in the dirt.
Changed line(s) 48 (click to see context) from:
** [[spoiler: Heather-Jasper Howe being revealed to be Jonathan Jacobo isn't too bad, but it gets a little disturbing when Ned reveals that they cuddled, [[UnsettlingGenderReveal while the latter was under the impression the former was a girl]]. Not helping matters is Jacobo appearing to be ''much'' older than Ned.]]
to:
** [[spoiler: Heather-Jasper [[spoiler:Heather-Jasper Howe being revealed to be Jonathan Jacobo isn't too bad, but it gets a little disturbing when Ned reveals that they cuddled, [[UnsettlingGenderReveal while the latter was under the impression the former was a girl]]. Not helping matters is Jacobo appearing to be ''much'' older than Ned.]]
Changed line(s) 53 (click to see context) from:
** There’s also the fact that they missed some obvious choices for monsters to feature, including the Creeper, Charlie the Robot, the Phantom Shadow, the Space Kook, and Captain Redbeard.
to:
** There’s There's also the fact that they missed some obvious choices for monsters to feature, including the Creeper, Charlie the Robot, the Phantom Shadow, the Space Kook, and Captain Redbeard.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* Sugarwiki/AwesomeMusic: The film's more action-based tone has Music/MXPX perform a ''hardcore rock cover'' of the classic theme song. Not anyone's cup of tea, but it certainly goes well with Scooby taking on the Tar Monster.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 52 (click to see context) from:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: When Velma discovers an altar dedicated to Jonathan Jacobo, it is easy to conclude that [[spoiler:Heather is the Doctor's daughter, who is trying to get revenge on Mystery Inc. for his death]]. Nope, as it turns out [[spoiler:Jacobo is the one who built the altar to stroke his massive ego, and was actually posing as the female reporter this entire time]]. What would be a perfectly reasonable motivation for the villain is thrown out of the window for the sake of making one bad joke.
to:
** There’s also the fact that they missed some obvious choices for monsters to feature, including the Creeper, Charlie the Robot, the Phantom Shadow, the Space Kook, and Captain Redbeard.
*TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot:
** When Velma discovers an altar dedicated to Jonathan Jacobo, it is easy to conclude that [[spoiler:Heather is the Doctor's daughter, who is trying to get revenge on Mystery Inc. for his death]]. Nope, as it turns out [[spoiler:Jacobo is the one who built the altar to stroke his massive ego, and was actually posing as the female reporter this entire time]]. What would be a perfectly reasonable motivation for the villain is thrown out of the window for the sake of making one badjoke.joke.
** Only a few of the monsters are defeated in personal confrontations in the climax of the movie, and all the rest are defeated at the same time in the final battle. It would have been nice to see a SystematicVillainTakedown where each of them are confronted and defeated one by one.
*
** When Velma discovers an altar dedicated to Jonathan Jacobo, it is easy to conclude that [[spoiler:Heather is the Doctor's daughter, who is trying to get revenge on Mystery Inc. for his death]]. Nope, as it turns out [[spoiler:Jacobo is the one who built the altar to stroke his massive ego, and was actually posing as the female reporter this entire time]]. What would be a perfectly reasonable motivation for the villain is thrown out of the window for the sake of making one bad
** Only a few of the monsters are defeated in personal confrontations in the climax of the movie, and all the rest are defeated at the same time in the final battle. It would have been nice to see a SystematicVillainTakedown where each of them are confronted and defeated one by one.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 53 (click to see context) from:
* VindicatedByHistory: Somewhat. While nobody today will claim the film to be a masterpiece, the reception towards it has softened over time and nowadays, it's better appreciated by fans for being closer to the spirit of the cartoon, on top of having decent special affects and action scenes and a more consistent tone and focus than the original film, which is a far cry from the near universal negative reception the film had back in the day.
to:
* VindicatedByHistory: Somewhat. While nobody today will claim the film to be a masterpiece, the reception towards it has softened over time and nowadays, it's better appreciated by fans for being closer to the spirit of the cartoon, on top of having decent special affects effects and action scenes and a more consistent tone and focus than the original film, which is a far cry from the near universal negative reception the film had back in the day.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 26 (click to see context) from:
* ImprovedSecondAttempt: This movie took a better approach to giving Velma a love interest than [[Film/ScoobyDoo2002 previous movie]] did. Last time, he only served as a SatelliteLoveInterest to give Velma a reason to give Scrappy some exposition. This time, the new love interest, museum curator Patrick, is shown to have a lot in common with Velma and compounds this with more development of Velma being interested in him, but insecure he won't like her back. Later in the movie, she's also worried about getting to close to him when she finds circumstantial evidence implying that he's the Evil Masked Figure. Her insecurity also helps Shaggy and Scooby break out of the belief that they're {{Idiot Houdini}}s and face off against the monsters.
to:
* ImprovedSecondAttempt: This movie took a better approach to giving Velma a love interest than [[Film/ScoobyDoo2002 previous movie]] did. Last time, he only served as a SatelliteLoveInterest to give Velma a reason to give Scrappy some exposition. This time, the new love interest, museum curator Patrick, is shown to have a lot in common with Velma and compounds this with more development of Velma being interested in him, but insecure he won't like her back. Later in the movie, she's also worried about getting to too close to him when she finds circumstantial evidence implying that he's the Evil Masked Figure. Her insecurity also helps Shaggy and Scooby break out of the belief that they're {{Idiot Houdini}}s and face off against the monsters.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 26 (click to see context) from:
* ImprovedSecondAttempt: This movie took a better approach to giving Velma a love interest than [[Film/ScoobyDoo2002 previous movie]] did. Last time, he only served as a SatelliteLoveInterest to give Velma a reason to give Scrappy some exposition. This time, the new love interest, museum curator Patrick, is shown to have a lot in common with Velma and compounds this with more development of Velma being interested in him, but insecure she won't like him back. Later in the movie, she's also worried about getting to close to him when she finds circumstantial evidence implying that he's the Evil Masked Figure. Her insecurity also helps Shaggy and Scooby break out of the belief that they're {{Idiot Houdini}}s and face off against the monsters.
to:
* ImprovedSecondAttempt: This movie took a better approach to giving Velma a love interest than [[Film/ScoobyDoo2002 previous movie]] did. Last time, he only served as a SatelliteLoveInterest to give Velma a reason to give Scrappy some exposition. This time, the new love interest, museum curator Patrick, is shown to have a lot in common with Velma and compounds this with more development of Velma being interested in him, but insecure she he won't like him her back. Later in the movie, she's also worried about getting to close to him when she finds circumstantial evidence implying that he's the Evil Masked Figure. Her insecurity also helps Shaggy and Scooby break out of the belief that they're {{Idiot Houdini}}s and face off against the monsters.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 26 (click to see context) from:
* ImprovedSecondAttempt: This movie took a better approach to giving Velma a love interest than Film/ScoobyDoo2002 did. In the previous movie, he only served as a SatelliteLoveInterest to give Velma a reason to give Scrappy some exposition. This time, the new love interest is shown to have a lot in common with Velma and compounds this with more development of Velma being interested Patrick, but insecure she won't like him back. Later in the movie, she's also worried about getting to close to him when she finds circumstantial evidence implying that he's the Evil Masked Figure. Her insecurity also helps Shaggy and Scooby break out of the belief that they're [[IdiotHoudini IdiotHoudinis]] and face off against the monsters.
to:
* ImprovedSecondAttempt: This movie took a better approach to giving Velma a love interest than Film/ScoobyDoo2002 did. In the [[Film/ScoobyDoo2002 previous movie, movie]] did. Last time, he only served as a SatelliteLoveInterest to give Velma a reason to give Scrappy some exposition. This time, the new love interest interest, museum curator Patrick, is shown to have a lot in common with Velma and compounds this with more development of Velma being interested Patrick, in him, but insecure she won't like him back. Later in the movie, she's also worried about getting to close to him when she finds circumstantial evidence implying that he's the Evil Masked Figure. Her insecurity also helps Shaggy and Scooby break out of the belief that they're [[IdiotHoudini IdiotHoudinis]] {{Idiot Houdini}}s and face off against the monsters.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* ImprovedSecondAttempt: This movie took a better approach to giving Velma a love interest than Film/ScoobyDoo2002 did. In the previous movie, he only served as a SatelliteLoveInterest to give Velma a reason to give Scrappy some exposition. This time, the new love interest is shown to have a lot in common with Velma and compounds this with more development of Velma being interested Patrick, but insecure she won't like him back. Later in the movie, she's also worried about getting to close to him when she finds circumstantial evidence implying that he's the Evil Masked Figure. Her insecurity also helps Shaggy and Scooby break out of the belief that they're [[IdiotHoudini IdiotHoudinis]] and face off against the monsters.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 24 (click to see context) from:
** The BigBad using a disguise as [[spoiler:a woman to further his plans]] would be reused by [[WesternAnimation/TeenTitansGoToTheMovies another Warner Bros. property]], and then again to [[MemeticMutation memetic effect]] in [[WesternAnimation/{{Scoob}} yet another]] ''Scooby'' movie.
to:
** The BigBad using a disguise as [[spoiler:a woman to further his plans]] would be reused by [[WesternAnimation/TeenTitansGoToTheMovies another Warner Bros. property]], and then again to [[MemeticMutation memetic effect]] in [[WesternAnimation/{{Scoob}} yet another]] ''Scooby'' movie. Even funnier when the 10 film Scooby-Doo collection put out for WB's Best of 100 had these two movies on the same disc. And to top it off, it was ONLY THESE TWO MOVIES ON THAT DISC!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 17 (click to see context) from:
* EvilIsCool: Even among the sea of fan-favorite monsters, the Evil Masked Figure manages to avoid being overshadowed due to Scott McNeil's performance, a cool costume design, and being a serious threat the whole time.
to:
* EvilIsCool: Even among the sea of fan-favorite monsters, the Evil Masked Figure manages to avoid being overshadowed due to Scott McNeil's [=McNeil=]'s performance, a cool costume design, and being a serious threat the whole time.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* EvilIsCool: Even among the sea of fan-favorite monsters, the Evil Masked Figure manages to avoid being overshadowed due to Scott McNeil's performance, a cool costume design, and being a serious threat the whole time.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 23 (click to see context) from:
** The BigBad using a disguise as [[spoiler:a woman to further his plans]] would be reused by [[WesternAnimation/TeenTitansGoToTheMovies another Warner Bros. property]], and then again to [[MemeticMutation memetic effect]] in [[WesternAnimation/{{Scoob}} yet another]] ''Scooby-Doo'' movie
to:
** The BigBad using a disguise as [[spoiler:a woman to further his plans]] would be reused by [[WesternAnimation/TeenTitansGoToTheMovies another Warner Bros. property]], and then again to [[MemeticMutation memetic effect]] in [[WesternAnimation/{{Scoob}} yet another]] ''Scooby-Doo'' movie''Scooby'' movie.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 23 (click to see context) from:
** The BigBad using a disguise as [[spoiler:a woman to further his plans]] would be reused by [[WesternAnimation/TeenTitansGoToTheMovies another Warner Bros. property]], and then again to [[MemeticMutation memetic effect]] in [[WesternAnimation/{{Scoob}} yet another]] (which ''also'' happens to be a ''Scooby-Doo'' film).
to:
** The BigBad using a disguise as [[spoiler:a woman to further his plans]] would be reused by [[WesternAnimation/TeenTitansGoToTheMovies another Warner Bros. property]], and then again to [[MemeticMutation memetic effect]] in [[WesternAnimation/{{Scoob}} yet another]] (which ''also'' happens to be a ''Scooby-Doo'' film).movie
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 29 (click to see context) from:
* {{Narm}}: Daphne’s “fight” against the 10,000 Volt Ghost is too ridiculous to take seriously. After telling him to “taste the pain”, she [[TooDumbToLive ''kicks him head on'']]. Unsurprisingly, she gets flung into the air like a ragdoll and lands straight in the dirt.
to:
* {{Narm}}: Daphne’s “fight” against the 10,000 Volt Ghost is too ridiculous to take seriously. After telling him to “taste the pain”, she [[TooDumbToLive ''kicks ''[[TooDumbToLive kicks him head on'']].on]]''. Unsurprisingly, she gets flung into the air like a ragdoll and lands straight in the dirt.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* {{Narm}}: Daphne’s “fight” against the 10,000 Volt Ghost is too ridiculous to take seriously. After telling him to “taste the pain”, she [[TooDumbToLive ''kicks him head on'']]. Unsurprisingly, she gets flung into the air like a ragdoll and lands straight in the dirt.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 50 (click to see context) from:
* VindicatedByHistory: Somewhat. While nobody today will claim the film to be a masterpiece, the reception towards it has softened over time and nowadays, it's better appreciated by fans for being closer to the spirit of the cartoon, on top of having a more consistent tone and focus than the original film, which is a far cry from the near universal negative reception the film had back in the day.
to:
* VindicatedByHistory: Somewhat. While nobody today will claim the film to be a masterpiece, the reception towards it has softened over time and nowadays, it's better appreciated by fans for being closer to the spirit of the cartoon, on top of having decent special affects and action scenes and a more consistent tone and focus than the original film, which is a far cry from the near universal negative reception the film had back in the day.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 50 (click to see context) from:
* VindicatedByHistory: Somewhat. While nobody today is gonna claim the film to be a masterpiece, the reception towards the film has softened over time and nowadays, it's better appreciated by fans for being closer to the spirit of the cartoon, on top of having a more consistent tone and focus than the original film, which is a far cry from the near universal negative reception the film had back in the day.
to:
* VindicatedByHistory: Somewhat. While nobody today is gonna will claim the film to be a masterpiece, the reception towards the film it has softened over time and nowadays, it's better appreciated by fans for being closer to the spirit of the cartoon, on top of having a more consistent tone and focus than the original film, which is a far cry from the near universal negative reception the film had back in the day.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Maybe it's just me, but I have no idea what the person who added the Alternative Joke Interpretation edit was trying to say.
Deleted line(s) 1 (click to see context) :
* AlternativeJokeInterpretation: Did Ned and Heather Jasper Howe/[[spoiler:Dr. Jonathan Jacobo]] cuddle with each other [[spoiler:or was it just an act]]?
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* ContestedSequel: For some, it is a SurprisinglyImprovedSequel or a film that has an odd case of {{Sequelitis}}.
to:
* ContestedSequel: For some, it is a SurprisinglyImprovedSequel or SurprisinglyImprovedSequel. To others, it's a film that has with an odd case of {{Sequelitis}}.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 41 (click to see context) from:
* SoBadItsGood: While the film isn't exactly Oscar bait, a lot of people enjoyed some of the genuinely good attempts at praising the Scooby-Doo lore and capturing some qualities from the classic cartoon.
to:
* SoBadItsGood: SoOkayItsAverage: While the film isn't exactly Oscar bait, a lot of people enjoyed some of the genuinely good attempts at praising the Scooby-Doo lore and capturing some qualities from the classic cartoon.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Authors Saving Throw is now trivia and requires Word Of God citation per-TRS
. Examples will be moved or deleted.
. Examples will be moved or deleted.Deleted line(s) 3,5 (click to see context) :
* AuthorsSavingThrow:
** In addition to ignoring the [[Film/ScoobyDoo2002 previous movie]], the overall tone feels a lot closer to the cartoons, having fun hitting on familiar Scooby Doo beats instead of making fun of them.
** Mystery Inc. had their negative traits toned down a lot more.
** In addition to ignoring the [[Film/ScoobyDoo2002 previous movie]], the overall tone feels a lot closer to the cartoons, having fun hitting on familiar Scooby Doo beats instead of making fun of them.
** Mystery Inc. had their negative traits toned down a lot more.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 54 (click to see context) from:
* VindicatedByHistory: Somewhat. While nobody today is gonna claim the film to be a masterpiece or what not, the reception towards the film has softened over time and nowadays, it’s mostly regarded by many as a SoOkayItsAverage kids film with some good moments here and there and is better appreciated now for being closer to the spirit of the cartoon and for having a more consistent tone and focus than the original film, which is still a far cry from the near universal negative reception the film had back in the day.
to:
* VindicatedByHistory: Somewhat. While nobody today is gonna claim the film to be a masterpiece or what not, masterpiece, the reception towards the film has softened over time and nowadays, it’s mostly regarded by many as a SoOkayItsAverage kids film with some good moments here and there and is it's better appreciated now by fans for being closer to the spirit of the cartoon and for cartoon, on top of having a more consistent tone and focus than the original film, which is still a far cry from the near universal negative reception the film had back in the day.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 43 (click to see context) from:
%%** Fred being filmed saying "I think Coolsville sucks" then having it broadcasted without the proper context.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
A bit of swearing doesn't mean a film is not meant for kids. Also removing two entries that almost border on ZCE.
Changed line(s) 53,55 (click to see context) from:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot:
** When Velma discovers an altar dedicated to Jonathan Jacobo, it is easy to conclude that [[spoiler:Heather is the Doctor's daughter, who is trying to get revenge on Mystery Inc. for his death]]. Nope, as it turns out [[spoiler:Jacobo is the one who built the altar to stroke his massive ego, and was actually posing as the female reporter this entire time]]. What would be a perfectly reasonable motivation for the villain is thrown out of the window for the sake of making one bad joke.
** The film could have been a proper sequel to the [[Film/ScoobyDoo2002 original theatrical film]], but instead, it appears to be set in a different canon.
** When Velma discovers an altar dedicated to Jonathan Jacobo, it is easy to conclude that [[spoiler:Heather is the Doctor's daughter, who is trying to get revenge on Mystery Inc. for his death]]. Nope, as it turns out [[spoiler:Jacobo is the one who built the altar to stroke his massive ego, and was actually posing as the female reporter this entire time]]. What would be a perfectly reasonable motivation for the villain is thrown out of the window for the sake of making one bad joke.
** The film could have been a proper sequel to the [[Film/ScoobyDoo2002 original theatrical film]], but instead, it appears to be set in a different canon.
to:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot:
**TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: When Velma discovers an altar dedicated to Jonathan Jacobo, it is easy to conclude that [[spoiler:Heather is the Doctor's daughter, who is trying to get revenge on Mystery Inc. for his death]]. Nope, as it turns out [[spoiler:Jacobo is the one who built the altar to stroke his massive ego, and was actually posing as the female reporter this entire time]]. What would be a perfectly reasonable motivation for the villain is thrown out of the window for the sake of making one bad joke.
** The film could have been a proper sequel to the [[Film/ScoobyDoo2002 original theatrical film]], but instead, it appears to be set in a different canon.joke.
**
** The film could have been a proper sequel to the [[Film/ScoobyDoo2002 original theatrical film]], but instead, it appears to be set in a different canon.
Deleted line(s) 58,61 (click to see context) :
* WhatDoYouMeanItsForKids: Fred is tricked into saying "sucks" with one instance of "crap" said by the Black Knight. Not to mention that some of the Tar Monster sequences are downright ''horrifying''. It's still more family-friendly than the first film.
* WinBackTheCrowd:
** When the first trailer came out, many people were excited to see Scooby face off monsters from the cartoons.
** When the second trailer came out on November 2003, it showed most of the monsters, which convinced fans to see it.
* WinBackTheCrowd:
** When the first trailer came out, many people were excited to see Scooby face off monsters from the cartoons.
** When the second trailer came out on November 2003, it showed most of the monsters, which convinced fans to see it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
** In addition to ignoring the [[Film/ScoobyDoo previous movie]], the overall tone feels a lot closer to the cartoons, having fun hitting on familiar Scooby Doo beats instead of making fun of them.
to:
** In addition to ignoring the [[Film/ScoobyDoo [[Film/ScoobyDoo2002 previous movie]], the overall tone feels a lot closer to the cartoons, having fun hitting on familiar Scooby Doo beats instead of making fun of them.
Changed line(s) 53 (click to see context) from:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: When Velma discovers an altar dedicated to Jonathan Jacobo, it is easy to conclude that [[spoiler:Heather is the Doctor's daughter, who is trying to get revenge on Mystery Inc. for his death]]. Nope, as it turns out [[spoiler:Jacobo is the one who built the altar to stroke his massive ego, and was actually posing as the female reporter this entire time]]. What would be a perfectly reasonable motivation for the villain is thrown out of the window for the sake of making one bad joke.
to:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot:
** When Velma discovers an altar dedicated to Jonathan Jacobo, it is easy to conclude that [[spoiler:Heather is the Doctor's daughter, who is trying to get revenge on Mystery Inc. for his death]]. Nope, as it turns out [[spoiler:Jacobo is the one who built the altar to stroke his massive ego, and was actually posing as the female reporter this entire time]]. What would be a perfectly reasonable motivation for the villain is thrown out of the window for the sake of making one badjoke.joke.
** The film could have been a proper sequel to the [[Film/ScoobyDoo2002 original theatrical film]], but instead, it appears to be set in a different canon.
** When Velma discovers an altar dedicated to Jonathan Jacobo, it is easy to conclude that [[spoiler:Heather is the Doctor's daughter, who is trying to get revenge on Mystery Inc. for his death]]. Nope, as it turns out [[spoiler:Jacobo is the one who built the altar to stroke his massive ego, and was actually posing as the female reporter this entire time]]. What would be a perfectly reasonable motivation for the villain is thrown out of the window for the sake of making one bad
** The film could have been a proper sequel to the [[Film/ScoobyDoo2002 original theatrical film]], but instead, it appears to be set in a different canon.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 48 (click to see context) from:
** [[spoiler: Heather-Jasper Howe being revealed to be Jonathan Jacobo is one thing, but it gets a little disturbing when Ned reveals that they cuddled, [[UnsettlingGenderReveal while the latter was under the impression the former was a girl]].]]
to:
** [[spoiler: Heather-Jasper Howe being revealed to be Jonathan Jacobo is one thing, isn't too bad, but it gets a little disturbing when Ned reveals that they cuddled, [[UnsettlingGenderReveal while the latter was under the impression the former was a girl]].]] girl]]. Not helping matters is Jacobo appearing to be ''much'' older than Ned.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 47,48 (click to see context) from:
** Shaggy transforming into a woman.
** [[spoiler: Heather-Jasper Howe's UnsettlingGenderReveal.]]
** [[spoiler: Heather-Jasper Howe's UnsettlingGenderReveal.]]
to:
** Shaggy transforming into a woman.
woman. More specifically, the fact that female Shaggy has an attractive body but still has [[ButterFace Matthew Lillard's face]], causing them to look rather off-putting.
** [[spoiler: Heather-JasperHowe's UnsettlingGenderReveal.Howe being revealed to be Jonathan Jacobo is one thing, but it gets a little disturbing when Ned reveals that they cuddled, [[UnsettlingGenderReveal while the latter was under the impression the former was a girl]].]]
** [[spoiler: Heather-Jasper
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 54 (click to see context) from:
* VindicatedByHistory: Somewhat. While nobody today is gonna claim the film to be a masterpiece or what not, the reception towards the film has softened over time and nowadays, it’s mostly regarded by many as an SoOkayItsAverage kids film with some good moments here and there and is better appreciated now for being closer to the spirit of the cartoon and for having a more consistent tone and focus than the original film, which is still a far cry from the near universal negative reception the film had back in the day.
to:
* VindicatedByHistory: Somewhat. While nobody today is gonna claim the film to be a masterpiece or what not, the reception towards the film has softened over time and nowadays, it’s mostly regarded by many as an a SoOkayItsAverage kids film with some good moments here and there and is better appreciated now for being closer to the spirit of the cartoon and for having a more consistent tone and focus than the original film, which is still a far cry from the near universal negative reception the film had back in the day.
