Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / Glory

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** When Shaw's wounds are being treated in a hospital, there's a soldier whose leg is getting amputated screaming, pleading and writhing in pain in the background. Even though it's covered by a curtain, [[ShadowDiscretionShot you can still see what's going on a bit]] and you can still see the soldier's face. His screams are just very unnerving and chilling, and just make you feel really bad for him too. On top of that, it just shows you how bad war and amputations were back in the day.

to:

** When Shaw's wounds are being treated in a hospital, there's a soldier whose leg is getting amputated screaming, pleading and writhing in pain in the background. Even though it's covered by a curtain, [[ShadowDiscretionShot you can still see what's going on a bit]] and you can still see the soldier's face. His screams are just very unnerving and chilling, and just make you feel really bad for him too. On top of that, it just shows you how bad [[WarIsHell war and amputations were back in the day.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** A drill sergeant's primary purpose is to instill military discipline, so that soldiers understand how to follow orders and work and fight as a unit; otherwise they're just a mob. Mulcahy did that.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Creator/AndreBraugher plays Thomas in his first movie role.

to:

* ** Creator/AndreBraugher plays Thomas in his first movie role.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Creator/AndreBraugher plays Thomas in his first movie role.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* RetroactiveRecognition: One of the white soldiers Trip picks a fight with while the 54th is clearing logs is Creator/MarkMargolis.

to:

* RetroactiveRecognition: ** One of the white soldiers Trip picks a fight with while the 54th is clearing logs is Creator/MarkMargolis.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* RetroactiveRecognition: One of the white soldiers Trip picks a fight with while the 54th is clearing logs is Creator/MarkMargolis.

Added: 518

Changed: 8

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: Sergeant Major Mulcahy. Is he merely a CruelToBeKind instructor with no real racist tendencies towards the black recruits, or a genuine racist taking advantage of being able to mistreat the recruits without consequences? Is his "let them grow up" justification for his severe treatment and racist insults toward the recruits, or is just an excuse for his superiors so they won't make him change his methods and attitudes?

to:

* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: Sergeant Major Mulcahy. Is he merely a CruelToBeKind instructor with no real racist tendencies towards the black recruits, or a genuine racist taking advantage of being able to mistreat the recruits without consequences? Is his "let them grow up" justification for his severe treatment and racist insults toward the recruits, recruits sincere, or is just an excuse for his superiors so they won't make him change his methods and attitudes?attitudes?
** Is Mulcahy's training even really that ''effective,'' given that most of the 54th only last a raid and two battles before being massacred at the end of the movie?
** Would Shaw still have had Trip whipped had he known beforehand that Trip wasn't actually deserting but only going to find himself a decent pair of shoes? Or would have he ordered the whipping anyway since Trip (despite fully intending to return to camp after finding the shoes) still went AWOL without permission or telling anyone where he was going?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: Sergeant Major Mulcahy. Is he merely a CruelToBeKind instructor with no real racist tendencies towards the black recruits, or a genuine racist taking advantage of being able to mistreat the recruits without consequences? Is his "let them grow up" justification for his severe treatment and racist insults toward the recruits, or is just an excuse for his superiors so they won't make him change his methods and attitudes?

Added: 494

Changed: 583

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AwardSnub: Nominated for 5 Oscars, yet oddly enough, Best Picture wasn't one of them.
** Neither was James Horner's score, which is considered one of his best works. Horner was still nominated that year for ''Film/{{Field of Dreams}}'' though.

to:

* AwardSnub: Nominated for 5 Oscars, five UsefulNotes/{{Academy Award}}s, yet oddly enough, Best Picture wasn't one of them.
** Neither was James Horner's Music/JamesHorner's score, which is considered one of his best works. Horner was still nominated that year for ''Film/{{Field of Dreams}}'' ''Film/FieldOfDreams'' though.



* NightmareFuel: When Shaw's wounds are being treated in a hospital, there's a soldier whose leg is getting amputated screaming, pleading and writhing in pain in the background. Even though it's covered by a curtain, [[ShadowDiscretionShot you can still see what's going on a bit]] and you can still see the soldier's face. His screams are just very unnerving and chilling, and just make you feel really bad for him too. On top of that, it just shows you how bad war and amputations were back in the day.

to:

* NightmareFuel: NightmareFuel:
**
When Shaw's wounds are being treated in a hospital, there's a soldier whose leg is getting amputated screaming, pleading and writhing in pain in the background. Even though it's covered by a curtain, [[ShadowDiscretionShot you can still see what's going on a bit]] and you can still see the soldier's face. His screams are just very unnerving and chilling, and just make you feel really bad for him too. On top of that, it just shows you how bad war and amputations were back in the day.



* RetroactiveRecognition: That's Ethan Phillips (AKA [[Series/StarTrekVoyager Neelix]]) tending Shaw's wounds after the Battle of Antienam in the beginning. Though Phillips has had a long career before ''Glory'', such as being a regular on ''Series/{{Benson}}'' as Pete.

to:

* RetroactiveRecognition: That's Ethan Phillips (AKA [[Series/StarTrekVoyager Neelix]]) Creator/EthanPhillips tending Shaw's wounds after the Battle of Antienam in the beginning. Though Phillips has had a long career before ''Glory'', such as being a regular on ''Series/{{Benson}}'' as Pete.



* UglyCute: Henry, who is a giant demon-thing, but also lovely and nice and likes taking pictures with old cameras.

to:

* UglyCute: Henry, who is a giant demon-thing, but also lovely and nice and likes taking pictures with old cameras.cameras.
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Neither was James Horner's score, which is considered one of his best works. Horner was still nominated that year for ''Film/{{Field of Dreams}}'' though.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not ymmv.


* IdiotBall: What makes the scene where Shaw has Trip whipped so hard to watch, besides the violence and sheer ValuesDissonance of it all, is the fact that it ''shouldn't have happened at all''. The entire sequence only happens because three of the film's characters make stupid decisions at the worst possible time. To elaborate: Trip is whipped because Shaw thinks he tried to desert his post, but as it turns out, Trip was only going to get shoes for the rest of the regiment and had every intention of returning once his task was complete. However, this information is only brought to light once the punishment has already been carried out and it's not revealed beforehand due to 1) Shaw blindly believing the accusations against Trip without at least investigating to make sure they're real, 2) Trip making absolutely no effort to even explain or defend himself, and 3) Rawlins, who knew the truth about Trip ''the whole time'', only choosing to explain what really happened to Shaw '''after''' Trip has been whipped. A fine example of a tragic, gruesome situation that could have been avoided had these characters made smarter and more timely moves.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* RetroactiveRecognition: That's Ethan Phillips (AKA [[Series/StarTrekVoyager Neelix]]) tending Shaw's wounds after the Battle of Antienam in the beginning. Though Phillips had a long career before ''Glory'', such as being a regular on ''Series/{{Benson}}'' as Pete.

to:

* RetroactiveRecognition: That's Ethan Phillips (AKA [[Series/StarTrekVoyager Neelix]]) tending Shaw's wounds after the Battle of Antienam in the beginning. Though Phillips has had a long career before ''Glory'', such as being a regular on ''Series/{{Benson}}'' as Pete.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* RetroactiveRecognition: That's Ethan Phillips (AKA [[Series/StarTrekVoyager Neelix]]) tending Shaw's wounds after the Battle of Antienam in the beginning. Not really Retroactive, however -- he'd had a long career before ''Glory'', such as being a regular on ''Series/{{Benson}}'' as Pete.

to:

* RetroactiveRecognition: That's Ethan Phillips (AKA [[Series/StarTrekVoyager Neelix]]) tending Shaw's wounds after the Battle of Antienam in the beginning. Not really Retroactive, however -- he'd Though Phillips had a long career before ''Glory'', such as being a regular on ''Series/{{Benson}}'' as Pete.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* RetroactiveRecognition: That's [[Series/StarTrekVoyager Neelix]] tending Shaw's wounds after the Battle of Antienam in the beginning. Not really Retroactive, however -- he'd had a long career before ''Glory'', such as being a regular on ''Series/{{Benson}}'' as Pete.

to:

* RetroactiveRecognition: That's Ethan Phillips (AKA [[Series/StarTrekVoyager Neelix]] Neelix]]) tending Shaw's wounds after the Battle of Antienam in the beginning. Not really Retroactive, however -- he'd had a long career before ''Glory'', such as being a regular on ''Series/{{Benson}}'' as Pete.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* RetroactiveRecognition: That's [[Series/StarTrekVoyager Neelix]] tending Shaw's wounds after the Battle of Antienam in the beginning.

to:

* RetroactiveRecognition: That's [[Series/StarTrekVoyager Neelix]] tending Shaw's wounds after the Battle of Antienam in the beginning. Not really Retroactive, however -- he'd had a long career before ''Glory'', such as being a regular on ''Series/{{Benson}}'' as Pete.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The scene where Shaw tries to intimidate the quartermaster over confiscated shoes for the slaves. Creator/MatthewBroderick isn't really the intimidating type, as you can see.

to:

** The scene where Shaw tries to intimidate intimidates the quartermaster over confiscated shoes for the slaves. Creator/MatthewBroderick isn't really the intimidating type, as you can see.


* ChaoticNeutral: Nanaja, with a dash of AxCrazy. She only fights on Glory's side because she hates her father more.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CrowningMusicOfAwesome: Just about the entirety of Music/JamesHorner's score. Highlights include "A Call to Arms," "The Whipping," "Preparations for Battle" and, of course, "[[OminousLatinChanting Charging Fort Wagner]]".

to:

* CrowningMusicOfAwesome: SugarWiki/AwesomeMusic: Just about the entirety of Music/JamesHorner's score. Highlights include "A Call to Arms," "The Whipping," "Preparations for Battle" and, of course, "[[OminousLatinChanting Charging Fort Wagner]]".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The scene where Shaw tries to intimidate the quartermaster over confiscated shoes for the slaves. Creator/MatthewBroderick isn't really the intimidating type.

to:

** The scene where Shaw tries to intimidate the quartermaster over confiscated shoes for the slaves. Creator/MatthewBroderick isn't really the intimidating type.type, as you can see.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** What about the scene where Creator/MatthewBroderick tries to intimidate the quartermaster? Who in their right mind would be intimidated by [[Film/FerrisBuellersDayOff Ferris Bueller]]?

to:

** What about the The scene where Shaw tries to intimidate the quartermaster over confiscated shoes for the slaves. Creator/MatthewBroderick tries to intimidate isn't really the quartermaster? Who in their right mind would be intimidated by [[Film/FerrisBuellersDayOff Ferris Bueller]]?intimidating type.

Added: 214

Changed: 13

Removed: 22

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


!!''Film/{{Glory}} The Film''

to:

!!''Film/{{Glory}} The Film''!!''Film/{{Glory}}'' (The Film)



!!''ComicBook/{{Glory}} The Comics''
!!Joe Keatinge's Glory

to:

!!''ComicBook/{{Glory}} The Comics''
!!Joe Keatinge's Glory
!!''ComicBook/{{Glory}}'' (The Comic)


Added DiffLines:

* MyRealDaddy: Moore's ''Glory'' was regarded as an improvement, but also a dry-run for his ideas for ''Comicbook/{{Promethea}}''. But Keatinge's ''Glory'' was regarded as one of the best Image relaunches in years.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* {{Narm}}:
** During the final battle, Searles climbs over the hill and yells, "'''WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGGHHHHOOOO!'''".
** What about the scene where Creator/MatthewBroderick tries to intimidate the quartermaster? Who in their right mind would be intimidated by [[Film/FerrisBuellersDayOff Ferris Bueller]]?

Changed: 13

Removed: 106

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CrowningMomentOfAwesome: Shaw tears his paycheck in half, demonstrating unmistakably whose side he's on.



* EveryoneIsJesusInPurgatory: In his review of ''Glory'', Civil War historian James R. [=McPherson=] suggested that the scene where Shaw is practicing his sword technique to slice up watermelons symbolized a desire by the filmmakers to destroy negative stereotypes of African-Americans. Director Creator/EdwardZwick, however, said that they just used watermelons in that scene because pumpkins were out of season at the time of filming.

to:

* EveryoneIsJesusInPurgatory: In his review of ''Glory'', review, Civil War historian James R. [=McPherson=] suggested that the scene where Shaw is practicing his sword technique to slice up watermelons symbolized a desire by the filmmakers to destroy negative stereotypes of African-Americans. Director Creator/EdwardZwick, however, said that they just used watermelons in that scene because pumpkins were out of season at the time of filming.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* EveryoneIsJesusInPurgatory: In his review of ''Glory'', Civil War historian James R. [=McPherson=] suggested that the scene where Shaw is practicing his sword technique to slice up watermelons symbolized a desire by the filmmakers to destroy negative stereotypes of African-Americans. Director Edward Zwick, however, said that they just used watermelons in that scene because pumpkins were out of season at the time of filming.

to:

* EveryoneIsJesusInPurgatory: In his review of ''Glory'', Civil War historian James R. [=McPherson=] suggested that the scene where Shaw is practicing his sword technique to slice up watermelons symbolized a desire by the filmmakers to destroy negative stereotypes of African-Americans. Director Edward Zwick, Creator/EdwardZwick, however, said that they just used watermelons in that scene because pumpkins were out of season at the time of filming.



** Also less apparent is the appearance of a tourist's head in the background of the scene where Rawlins declares a "Year of Jubilee." Both of these are pointed by director Edward Zwick during the course of his DVDCommentary.

to:

** Also less apparent is the appearance of a tourist's head in the background of the scene where Rawlins declares a "Year of Jubilee." Both of these are pointed by director Edward Zwick Creator/EdwardZwick during the course of his DVDCommentary.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Required to be acknowledged in-universe.


* IdiotBall / CouldHaveAvoidedThisPlot: What makes the scene where Shaw has Trip whipped so hard to watch, besides the violence and sheer ValuesDissonance of it all, is the fact that it ''shouldn't have happened at all''. The entire sequence only happens because three of the film's characters make stupid decisions at the worst possible time. To elaborate: Trip is whipped because Shaw thinks he tried to desert his post, but as it turns out, Trip was only going to get shoes for the rest of the regiment and had every intention of returning once his task was complete. However, this information is only brought to light once the punishment has already been carried out and it's not revealed beforehand due to 1) Shaw blindly believing the accusations against Trip without at least investigating to make sure they're real, 2) Trip making absolutely no effort to even explain or defend himself, and 3) Rawlins, who knew the truth about Trip ''the whole time'', only choosing to explain what really happened to Shaw '''after''' Trip has been whipped. A fine example of a tragic, gruesome situation that could have been avoided had these characters made smarter and more timely moves.

to:

* IdiotBall / CouldHaveAvoidedThisPlot: IdiotBall: What makes the scene where Shaw has Trip whipped so hard to watch, besides the violence and sheer ValuesDissonance of it all, is the fact that it ''shouldn't have happened at all''. The entire sequence only happens because three of the film's characters make stupid decisions at the worst possible time. To elaborate: Trip is whipped because Shaw thinks he tried to desert his post, but as it turns out, Trip was only going to get shoes for the rest of the regiment and had every intention of returning once his task was complete. However, this information is only brought to light once the punishment has already been carried out and it's not revealed beforehand due to 1) Shaw blindly believing the accusations against Trip without at least investigating to make sure they're real, 2) Trip making absolutely no effort to even explain or defend himself, and 3) Rawlins, who knew the truth about Trip ''the whole time'', only choosing to explain what really happened to Shaw '''after''' Trip has been whipped. A fine example of a tragic, gruesome situation that could have been avoided had these characters made smarter and more timely moves.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The opening with the Battle of Antietam also has this, when a fellow officer gets his head ''shredded'' by an exploding cannonball, with viscera splattering on Shaw's face.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Crowning Moment of Awesome}}: Shaw tears his paycheck in half, demonstrating unmistakably whose side he's on.
* CrowningMusicOfAwesome: Just about the entirety of James Horner's score. Highlights include "A Call to Arms", "The Whipping", "Preparations for Battle" and of course "[[OminousLatinChanting Charging Fort Wagner]]".

to:

* {{Crowning Moment of Awesome}}: CrowningMomentOfAwesome: Shaw tears his paycheck in half, demonstrating unmistakably whose side he's on.
* CrowningMusicOfAwesome: Just about the entirety of James Horner's Music/JamesHorner's score. Highlights include "A Call to Arms", Arms," "The Whipping", Whipping," "Preparations for Battle" and and, of course course, "[[OminousLatinChanting Charging Fort Wagner]]".



* GeniusBonus: Viewers familiar with the period immediately before the Civil War will know what to expect when it is mentioned that Colonel Montgomery is from Kansas. Kansas Territory had been the site of a decade-long series of armed clashes between pro-slavery and abolitionist settlers known as "Bleeding Kansas", largely considered a prelude to the Civil War.
* IdiotBall/CouldHaveAvoidedThisPlot: What makes the scene where Shaw has Trip whipped so hard to watch--besides the violence and sheer ValuesDissonance of it all--is the fact that it ''shouldn't have happened at all.'' The entire sequence only happens because three of the film's characters make stupid decisions at the worst possible time. To elaborate: Trip is whipped because Shaw thinks he tried to desert his post. But as it turns out, Trip was only going to get shoes for the rest of the regiment, and had every intention of returning once his task was complete. But this information is only brought to light once the punishment has already been carried out, and it's not revealed beforehand due to 1) Shaw blindly believing the accusations against Trip without at least investigating to make sure they're real, 2) Trip making absolutely no effort to even explain or defend himself, and 3) Rawlins--who knew the truth about Trip ''the whole time''--only choosing to explain what really happened to Shaw '''after''' Trip has been whipped. A fine example of a tragic, gruesome situation that could have been avoided had these characters made smarter and more timely moves.
* NightmareFuel: When Shaw's wounds are being treated in a hospital, there's a soldier whose leg is getting amputated screaming, pleading and writhing in pain in the background. Even though it's covered by a curtain, [[ShadowDiscretionShot you can still see what's going on a bit,]] and you can still see the soldier's face. His screams are just very unnerving and chilling and just make you feel really bad for him too. On top of that it just shows you how bad war and amputations were back in the day.
* RetroactiveRecognition: That's [[Series/StarTrekVoyager Neelix]] tending Col. Shaw's wounds after the Battle of Antienam in the beginning.
* SpecialEffectsFailure: As [[spoiler:Shaw]] is falling after he has been shot dead, viewers can make out the squib line tied to one of his legs. Also less apparent is the appearance of a tourist's head in the background of the scene where Rawlins declares a "Year of Jubilee". Both of these are pointed by director Edward Zwick during the course of his DVDCommentary.

to:

* GeniusBonus: Viewers familiar with the period immediately before the Civil War will know what to expect when it is mentioned that Colonel Montgomery is from Kansas. Kansas Territory had been the site of a decade-long series of armed clashes between pro-slavery and abolitionist settlers known as "Bleeding Kansas", Kansas," largely considered a prelude to the Civil War.
War.
* IdiotBall/CouldHaveAvoidedThisPlot: IdiotBall / CouldHaveAvoidedThisPlot: What makes the scene where Shaw has Trip whipped so hard to watch--besides watch, besides the violence and sheer ValuesDissonance of it all--is all, is the fact that it ''shouldn't have happened at all.'' all''. The entire sequence only happens because three of the film's characters make stupid decisions at the worst possible time. To elaborate: Trip is whipped because Shaw thinks he tried to desert his post. But post, but as it turns out, Trip was only going to get shoes for the rest of the regiment, regiment and had every intention of returning once his task was complete. But However, this information is only brought to light once the punishment has already been carried out, out and it's not revealed beforehand due to 1) Shaw blindly believing the accusations against Trip without at least investigating to make sure they're real, 2) Trip making absolutely no effort to even explain or defend himself, and 3) Rawlins--who Rawlins, who knew the truth about Trip ''the whole time''--only time'', only choosing to explain what really happened to Shaw '''after''' Trip has been whipped. A fine example of a tragic, gruesome situation that could have been avoided had these characters made smarter and more timely moves.
* NightmareFuel: When Shaw's wounds are being treated in a hospital, there's a soldier whose leg is getting amputated screaming, pleading and writhing in pain in the background. Even though it's covered by a curtain, [[ShadowDiscretionShot you can still see what's going on a bit,]] bit]] and you can still see the soldier's face. His screams are just very unnerving and chilling chilling, and just make you feel really bad for him too. On top of that that, it just shows you how bad war and amputations were back in the day.
* RetroactiveRecognition: That's [[Series/StarTrekVoyager Neelix]] tending Col. Shaw's wounds after the Battle of Antienam in the beginning.
* SpecialEffectsFailure: As [[spoiler:Shaw]] is falling after he has been shot dead, viewers can make out the squib line tied to one of his legs. legs.
**
Also less apparent is the appearance of a tourist's head in the background of the scene where Rawlins declares a "Year of Jubilee". Jubilee." Both of these are pointed by director Edward Zwick during the course of his DVDCommentary.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* IdiotBall/CouldHaveAvoidedThisPlot: What makes the scene where Shaw has Trip whipped so hard to watch--besides the violence and sheer ValuesDissonace of it all--is the fact that it ''shouldn't have happened at all.'' The entire sequence only happens because three of the film's characters make stupid decisions at the worst possible time. To elaborate: Trip is whipped because Shaw thinks he tried to desert his post. But as it turns out, Trip was only going to get shoes for the rest of the regiment, and had every intention of returning once his task was complete. But this information is only brought to light once the punishment has already been carried out, and it's not revealed beforehand due to 1) Shaw blindly believing the accusations against Trip without at least investigating to make sure they're real, 2) Trip making absolutely no effort to even explain or defend himself, and 3) Rawlins--who knew the truth about Trip ''the whole time''--only choosing to explain what really happened to Shaw '''after''' Trip has been whipped. A fine example of a tragic, gruesome situation that could have been avoided had these characters made smarter and more timely moves.

to:

* IdiotBall/CouldHaveAvoidedThisPlot: What makes the scene where Shaw has Trip whipped so hard to watch--besides the violence and sheer ValuesDissonace ValuesDissonance of it all--is the fact that it ''shouldn't have happened at all.'' The entire sequence only happens because three of the film's characters make stupid decisions at the worst possible time. To elaborate: Trip is whipped because Shaw thinks he tried to desert his post. But as it turns out, Trip was only going to get shoes for the rest of the regiment, and had every intention of returning once his task was complete. But this information is only brought to light once the punishment has already been carried out, and it's not revealed beforehand due to 1) Shaw blindly believing the accusations against Trip without at least investigating to make sure they're real, 2) Trip making absolutely no effort to even explain or defend himself, and 3) Rawlins--who knew the truth about Trip ''the whole time''--only choosing to explain what really happened to Shaw '''after''' Trip has been whipped. A fine example of a tragic, gruesome situation that could have been avoided had these characters made smarter and more timely moves.

Added: 364

Changed: 13

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


! Film/{{Glory}} The Film

to:

! Film/{{Glory}} !!''Film/{{Glory}} The FilmFilm''



* GeniusBonus: Viewers familiar with the period immediately before the Civil War will know what to expect when it is mentioned that Colonel Montgomery is from Kansas. Kansas Territory had been the site of a decade-long series of armed clashes between pro-slavery and abolitionist settlers known as "Bleeding Kansas", largely considered a prelude to the Civil War.



! ComicBook/{{Glory}} The Comics
!! Joe Keatinge's Glory

to:

! ComicBook/{{Glory}} !!''ComicBook/{{Glory}} The Comics
!! Joe
Comics''
!!Joe
Keatinge's Glory

Top