Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / GameOfThronesS6E3Oathbreaker

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
General clarification on works content


* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: Alliser Thorne’s last words are meant to show how he only did what he thought was right for the Watch and he does face death with dignity. The thing is Thorne is a despicable man who is shown to have a deep hatred for all wildlings. He can’t even let go of his hatred even when both Lord Commanders plus many other men have seen the Army of the Dead and that if they left them to die they would only come back worse. Also his statement that the wildlings are an army of murderers and raiders is hypocritical considering that most of the men of the Night’s Watch are rapists and murderers. So Thorne comes off as more of a petty, racist, short-sighted traitor than as a man who was doing what he believed was right. Besides considering who he was, his death is pretty much deserved and satisfying.

to:

* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: Alliser Thorne’s last words are meant to show how he only did what he thought was right for the Watch and he does face death with dignity. The thing is is, Thorne is a despicable man who is shown to have a deep hatred for all wildlings. He can’t even let go of his hatred even when both Lord Commanders plus many other men have seen the Army of the Dead and that if they left them to die they would only come back worse. Also his statement that the wildlings are an army of murderers and raiders is hypocritical considering that most of the men of the Night’s Watch are rapists and murderers.murderers who've chosen Watch service as their penance. So Thorne comes off as more of a petty, racist, short-sighted traitor than as a man who was doing what he believed was right. Besides Besides, considering who what a consistently unpleasant bully he was, his death is pretty much deserved and satisfying.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Requires Word Of God confirmation


* AuthorsSavingThrow: Adapting out the Yunkai and Astapor conflict made Daenerys rule more incompetent than in the books and many fans were upset of the watered down politics of Mereen's arc. The fact that the Sons of Harpy are actually funded by those two and Volantis explains why they are more of a threat and arguably make a better plot than hiring a bunch of private armies to brute force the Mother of Dragons.

Added: 358

Removed: 348

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Wrong trope.


* CaptainObviousReveal: Nobody even bothers making secret that Robert Strong, the newest member of the Kingsguard, is in fact Ser Gregor Clegane who was resurrected as an undead knight. Likewise, unlike in the books Clegane's head isn't sent to Dorne after he died, removing whatever mystery and reason there would be to keep Robert Strong's identity secret.



* TheUntwist: Nobody even bothers making secret that Robert Strong, the newest member of the Kingsguard, is in fact Ser Gregor Clegane who was resurrected as an undead knight. Likewise, unlike in the books Clegane's head isn't sent to Dorne after he died, removing whatever mystery and reason there would be to keep Robert Strong's identity secret.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Misuse, refers to things that happen after the episode


* HilariousInHindsight: In a Pitch BlackComedy kind of way, Shaggydog's life truly was a ShaggyDogStory.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* InternetBackdraft: Due to the direwolves' massive fan following, Shaggydog's unceremonial DeathByAdaptation was quickly met by a huge across-the-board backlash on social media.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Unintentionally Unsympathetic: Alliser Thorne’s last words are meant to show how he only did what he thought was right for the Watch and he does face death with dignity. The thing is Thorne is a despicable man who is shown to have a deep hatred for all wildlings. He can’t even let go of his hatred even when both Lord Commanders plus many other men have seen the Army of the Dead and that if they left them to die they would only come back worse. Also his statement that the wildlings are an army of murderers and raiders is hypocritical considering that most of the men of the Night’s Watch are rapists and murderers. So Thorne comes off as more of a petty, racist, short-sighted traitor than as a man who was doing what he believed was right. Besides considering who he was, his death is pretty much deserved and satisfying.

to:

* Unintentionally Unsympathetic: UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: Alliser Thorne’s last words are meant to show how he only did what he thought was right for the Watch and he does face death with dignity. The thing is Thorne is a despicable man who is shown to have a deep hatred for all wildlings. He can’t even let go of his hatred even when both Lord Commanders plus many other men have seen the Army of the Dead and that if they left them to die they would only come back worse. Also his statement that the wildlings are an army of murderers and raiders is hypocritical considering that most of the men of the Night’s Watch are rapists and murderers. So Thorne comes off as more of a petty, racist, short-sighted traitor than as a man who was doing what he believed was right. Besides considering who he was, his death is pretty much deserved and satisfying.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Unintentionally Unsympathetic: Alliser Thorne’s last words are meant to show how he only did what he thought was right for the Watch and he does face death with dignity. The thing is Thorne is a despicable man who is shown to have a deep hatred for all wildlings. He can’t even let go of his hatred even when both Lord Commanders plus many other men have seen the Army of the Dead and that if they left them to die they would only come back worse. Also his statement that the wildlings are an army of murderers and raiders is hypocritical considering that most of the men of the Night’s Watch are rapists and murderers. So Thorne comes off as more of a petty, racist, short-sighted traitor than as a man who was doing what he believed was right. Besides considering who he was, his death is pretty much deserved and satisfying.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* FridgeBrilliance: Both Jon Snow and Beric Dondarion claim that TheNothingAfterDeath is what they saw when they died after being resurrected which seems to imply that despite all the various afterlives the various religions believe in, there is no afterlife. But consider that they were both resurrected, and if greenseers can see glimpses of the future then the theoretical afterlife would be able to recognize who is destined to be resurrected, so would not allow them into the afterlife, only for them to be pulled straight back out again. They do not recall the afterlife because they truly were stuck in limbo instead.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** The showrunners in the inside the episode as well as Bran consider finding out the truth of Arthur Dayne's death a BrokenPedestal moment and intend it to be a mythbusting take on Ned's honour. However, it is possible to consider Dayne as being the less honorable as he winds up dual wielding while at one point Ned only has a single sword.[[labelnote: From the books]]The code of chivalry in the books in the case of duels and general conduct is to fight an opponent with the same weapons and armour. Ser Arthur in the books was famous for telling a disarmed opponent to pick up a sword and continue to fight after disarming him and was seriously into the knightly ethos. In addition to using DualWielding against an opponent with a single sword, Arthur also wears a helmet against an opponent who fights without one, when the honorable course would have been to remove his helmet. One duel in the novels, shows a challenger removing his additional armour after seeing his opponent wearing lighter armour without helm[[/labelnote]]. Some point out that DualWielding is generally not as effective in battle and doesn't actually convey any special advantages, and Dayne's use of swords is not a reflection on his character. Others point out that it runs more on RuleOfCool since the scene in question is staged with HollywoodTactics (Ned and Howland Reed and two of their companions not wearing any helmets), with the lack of realism leaving it ambiguous on what they can infer from it.

to:

*** The showrunners in the inside the episode as well as Bran consider finding out the truth of Arthur Dayne's death a BrokenPedestal moment and intend it to be a mythbusting take on Ned's honour. However, it is possible to consider Dayne as being the less honorable as he winds up dual wielding while at one point Ned only has a single sword.[[labelnote: From the books]]The code of chivalry in the books in the case of duels and general conduct is to fight an opponent with the same weapons and armour. Ser Arthur in the books was famous for telling a disarmed opponent to pick up a sword and continue to fight after disarming him and was seriously into the knightly ethos. In addition to using DualWielding against an opponent with a single sword, Arthur also wears a helmet against an opponent who fights without one, when the honorable course would have been to remove his helmet. One duel in the novels, shows a challenger removing his additional armour after seeing his opponent wearing lighter armour without helm[[/labelnote]]. Some point out that DualWielding is generally not as effective in battle and doesn't actually convey any special advantages, and Dayne's use of swords is not a reflection on his character.character[[note]] The fight has a mix of equipment from the beginning, apparently for fighter preference; Ned, Reed, and the second Kingsguard use one sword, Dayne favors two, everyone else uses a sword and shield[[/note]]. Others point out that it runs more on RuleOfCool since the scene in question is staged with HollywoodTactics (Ned and Howland Reed and two of their companions not wearing any helmets), with the lack of realism leaving it ambiguous on what they can infer from it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HesJustHiding: Due to the wolves popularity and the small size of the head presented to Ramsay, some people have theorized that Shaggydog is still alive and that the Umbers used an ordinary wolf head as part of a plan. Likely just wishful thinking, but this episode does largely focus on a character who came BackFromTheDead.

to:

* HesJustHiding: Due to the wolves popularity and the small size of the head presented to Ramsay, some people have theorized that Shaggydog is still alive and that the Umbers used an ordinary wolf head as part of a plan. Likely just wishful thinking, but this episode does largely focus Unfortunately, his death was confirmed later on a character who came BackFromTheDead.in the season.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Natter.


*** Also, in medieval times, and in the modern age, attacking from behind while both sides are in active combat is not backstabbing. It's a ''very common'' tactic known as "'''''flanking'''''". The only way it could be construed as an unfair attack is if Arthur's supporters claimed that Arthur didn't know Reed was still alive, and only then shakily.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Also, in medieval times, and in the modern age, attacking from behind while both sides are in active combat is not backstabbing. It's a ''very common'' tactic known as '''''"flanking"'''''. The only way it could be construed as an unfair attack is if Arthur's supporters claimed that Arthur didn't know Reed was still alive, and only then shakily.

to:

*** **** Also, in medieval times, and in the modern age, attacking from behind while both sides are in active combat is not backstabbing. It's a ''very common'' tactic known as '''''"flanking"'''''."'''''flanking'''''". The only way it could be construed as an unfair attack is if Arthur's supporters claimed that Arthur didn't know Reed was still alive, and only then shakily.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**** Also, in medieval times, and in the modern age, attacking from behind while both sides are in active combat is not backstabbing. It's a ''very common'' tactic known as '''''"flanking"'''''. The only way it could be construed as an unfair attack is if Arthur's supporters claimed that Arthur didn't know Reed was still alive, and only then shakily.

Added: 179

Removed: 180

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Fandom Berserk Button is more about misconceptions about a work that are guaranteed to tick fans off.


* FandomBerserkButton: Due to the direwolves' massive fan following, Shaggydog's unceremonial DeathByAdaptation was quickly met by a huge across-the-board backlash on social media.


Added DiffLines:

* InternetBackdraft: Due to the direwolves' massive fan following, Shaggydog's unceremonial DeathByAdaptation was quickly met by a huge across-the-board backlash on social media.

Added: 431

Changed: 3008

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: Arthur Dayne's fight.
** The showrunners in the inside the episode as well as Bran consider finding out the truth of Arthur Dayne's death a BrokenPedestal moment and intend it to be a mythbusting take on Ned's honour. However, it is possible to consider Dayne as being the less honorable as he winds up dual wielding while at one point Ned only has a single sword.[[labelnote: From the books]]The code of chivalry in the books in the case of duels and general conduct is to fight an opponent with the same weapons and armour. Ser Arthur in the books was famous for telling a disarmed opponent to pick up a sword and continue to fight after disarming him and was seriously into the knightly ethos. In addition to using DualWielding against an opponent with a single sword, Arthur also wears a helmet against an opponent who fights without one, when the honorable course would have been to remove his helmet. One duel in the novels, shows a challenger removing his additional armour after seeing his opponent wearing lighter armour without helm[[/labelnote]]. Some point out that DualWielding is generally not as effective in battle and doesn't actually convey any special advantages, and Dayne's use of swords is not a reflection on his character. Others point out that it runs more on RuleOfCool since the scene in question is staged with HollywoodTactics (Ned and Howland Reed and two of their companions not wearing any helmets), with the lack of realism leaving it ambiguous on what they can infer from it.
** Some fans also wonder if Ned Stark actually boasted about beating Arthur Dayne which to many is out of character on his part, or that he merely let other people assume that he did and never actually conveyed the full details. Bran does confirm that Ned told him Ser Arthur was the greatest swordsman he ever faced and that Howland Reed saved his life, both of which are true, but he undoubtedly never told him the true context.

to:

* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: AlternativeCharacterInterpretation:
**
Arthur Dayne's fight.
**
fight has two examples.
***
The showrunners in the inside the episode as well as Bran consider finding out the truth of Arthur Dayne's death a BrokenPedestal moment and intend it to be a mythbusting take on Ned's honour. However, it is possible to consider Dayne as being the less honorable as he winds up dual wielding while at one point Ned only has a single sword.[[labelnote: From the books]]The code of chivalry in the books in the case of duels and general conduct is to fight an opponent with the same weapons and armour. Ser Arthur in the books was famous for telling a disarmed opponent to pick up a sword and continue to fight after disarming him and was seriously into the knightly ethos. In addition to using DualWielding against an opponent with a single sword, Arthur also wears a helmet against an opponent who fights without one, when the honorable course would have been to remove his helmet. One duel in the novels, shows a challenger removing his additional armour after seeing his opponent wearing lighter armour without helm[[/labelnote]]. Some point out that DualWielding is generally not as effective in battle and doesn't actually convey any special advantages, and Dayne's use of swords is not a reflection on his character. Others point out that it runs more on RuleOfCool since the scene in question is staged with HollywoodTactics (Ned and Howland Reed and two of their companions not wearing any helmets), with the lack of realism leaving it ambiguous on what they can infer from it.
** *** Some fans also wonder if Ned Stark actually boasted about beating Arthur Dayne which to many is out of character on his part, or that he merely let other people assume that he did and never actually conveyed the full details. Bran does confirm that Ned told him Ser Arthur was the greatest swordsman he ever faced and that Howland Reed saved his life, both of which are true, but he undoubtedly never told him the true context.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AuthorsSavingThrow: Adapting out the Yunkai and Astapor's conflict made Daenerys rule more incompetent than in the books and many fans were upset of the watered down politics of Mereen's arc. The fact that the Sons of Harpy are actually funded by those two and Volantis explains why they are more of a threat and arguably make a better plot than hiring a bunch of private armies to brute force the Mother of Dragons.
* FandomBerserkButton: Due to the direwolves' massive fan following, Shaggydog's unceremonial DeathByAdaptation was quickly met by a huge accross-the-board backlash on social media.
* HesJustHiding: Due to the wolves popularity and the small size of the head presented to Ramsay, some people have theorized that Shaggydog is still alive and that the Umbers used an ordinary wolf head as part of a plan. Likely just wishful thinking but this episode does largely focus on a character who came BackFromTheDead.

to:

* AuthorsSavingThrow: Adapting out the Yunkai and Astapor's Astapor conflict made Daenerys rule more incompetent than in the books and many fans were upset of the watered down politics of Mereen's arc. The fact that the Sons of Harpy are actually funded by those two and Volantis explains why they are more of a threat and arguably make a better plot than hiring a bunch of private armies to brute force the Mother of Dragons.
* FandomBerserkButton: Due to the direwolves' massive fan following, Shaggydog's unceremonial DeathByAdaptation was quickly met by a huge accross-the-board across-the-board backlash on social media.
* HesJustHiding: Due to the wolves popularity and the small size of the head presented to Ramsay, some people have theorized that Shaggydog is still alive and that the Umbers used an ordinary wolf head as part of a plan. Likely just wishful thinking thinking, but this episode does largely focus on a character who came BackFromTheDead.



* TheUntwist: Nobody even bothers making secret that Robert Strong, the newest member of the Kingsguard is in fact Ser Gregor Clegane who was resurrected as an undead knight. Likewise, unlike in the books Clegane's head isn't sent to Dorne after he died, removing whatever mystery and reason there would be to keep Robert Strong's identity secret.

to:

* TheUntwist: Nobody even bothers making secret that Robert Strong, the newest member of the Kingsguard Kingsguard, is in fact Ser Gregor Clegane who was resurrected as an undead knight. Likewise, unlike in the books Clegane's head isn't sent to Dorne after he died, removing whatever mystery and reason there would be to keep Robert Strong's identity secret.

Top