Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 8 (click to see context) from:
* CondemnedByHistory: When it started, the central idea of this story was rather new and interesting. However, over time, the fandom started seeing Celestia as more sympathetic. Now this is just another "Celestia is evil" story among many. Speaking of which, this version of Luna was once praised for being so different from other fandom versions, but now she's a borderline [[TheScrappy Scrappy]]. The story used to be rather well-liked, but nowadays it has few if any fans.
to:
* CondemnedByHistory: When it started, the central idea of this story was rather new and interesting. However, over time, the fandom started seeing Celestia as more sympathetic. Now this is just another "Celestia is evil" story among many. Speaking of which, Furthermore, this version of Luna was once praised for being so different from other fandom versions, but now she's a borderline [[TheScrappy Scrappy]]. The story used to be rather well-liked, but nowadays it has few if any fans.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 8 (click to see context) from:
* CondemnedByHistory: When it started, the central idea of this story was rather new and interesting. However, over time, the fandom started seeing Celestia as more sympathetic. Now this is just another "Celestia is evil" story among many. Speaking of which, this version of Luna was once praised for being so different from other fandom versions, but now she's a borderline [[TheScrappy Scrappy]]. While it still has its fans, the story is not as well-liked as it used to be.
to:
* CondemnedByHistory: When it started, the central idea of this story was rather new and interesting. However, over time, the fandom started seeing Celestia as more sympathetic. Now this is just another "Celestia is evil" story among many. Speaking of which, this version of Luna was once praised for being so different from other fandom versions, but now she's a borderline [[TheScrappy Scrappy]]. While it still has its fans, the The story is not as well-liked as it used to be.be rather well-liked, but nowadays it has few if any fans.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* BrokenAesop: The author has stated that two of the major themes of the story are that neither of the Princesses are wholly right or wrong, and that it is the responsibility of an individual to face the consequences of their past actions. But Celestia's actions and supporters come off as typical tyranny while she never get any defense or change to speak in it; she's absent after the first chapter. Meanwhile, Luna's flaws and misdeeds are never presented without an immediate argument in her defense and the reservations about her own beliefs acquired in earlier chapters are tossed aside with ease, noting that Celestia’s methods and philosophies have proven themselves useless. Luna's ancient adviser and confidant Morning Star, introduced as a self-serving manipulator and mastermind of the attempted coup, has been revised as a benevolent reformer whose proposals are recognized as flawless even by those who hear them second-hand and lack any knowledge of the matters involved.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Reason for deletion, "The trope requires that someone in-universe say the guy has a point", confused it for Jerkass Has A Point or Villain Has A Point. Strawman is when they have unintentional/unacknowledged by the work points.
Added DiffLines:
* StrawmanHasAPoint: When Captain Braveheart is court-martialed by Prince Blueblood, we're are supposed to side with Braveheart, and feel that Blueblood is badly mistreating him. This would be easier if everything Blueblood says about Braveheart (that he's a violent, hateful street punk in Royal Guard's clothing who has yet to succeed at a single task he undertakes in the story) wasn't true.
