Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / ChallengeOfTheGoBots

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* HarsherInHindsight: This portrayed a future world where the Cold War that was still running hot, with Anya Turgonova barely trusting the Americans, only for RealLife to have the Soviet Union collapse and Russia to end up part of the United Nations. However, Vladimir Putin, in the 2020's, reignited the Cold War, meaning that, whether she's from the 80's or the 20's, she's still going to have the same prejudices...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The toyline has gone through an even further reevaluation. For its original run, it was seen as the poverty version of ''Transformers'' favored by the least cool kids: the toys were smaller, cheaper, were linked to a lamer cartoon, and had dumb names. It didn't help that the cartoon, unlike ''Transformers'', had pretty toy-accurate character designs, which made it all the more obvious to kids that a lot of the toys had decidedly goofy looks. Retrospectives, meanwhile, tend to recognize that the ''Machine Robo'' molds had some pedigree of their own, and often note that, pound for pound, being smaller than equivalent Transformers was really the only downside to Gobots. They had more varied vehicle modes, less partforming, were more detailed and complex than Transformers in their size class, and some even seemingly outclassed their Transformer counterparts--for instance, Puzzler was a fully self-contained combiner, something ''Transformers'' didn't manage until the late 90s. Though calling them outright superior will still often get people yelling at you, calling them decent is far more acceptable than it once was.

to:

** The toyline has gone through an even further reevaluation. For its original run, it was seen as the poverty version of a poor man's ''Transformers'' favored favoured by the least cool kids: the toys were smaller, cheaper, were linked to a lamer cartoon, and had dumb names. It didn't help that the cartoon, unlike ''Transformers'', had pretty toy-accurate character designs, which made it all the more obvious to kids that a lot of the toys had decidedly goofy looks. Retrospectives, meanwhile, tend to recognize that the ''Machine Robo'' molds had some pedigree of their own, and often note that, pound for pound, being smaller than equivalent Transformers was really the only downside to Gobots. They had more varied vehicle modes, less partforming, were more detailed and complex than Transformers in their size class, and some even seemingly outclassed their Transformer counterparts--for instance, Puzzler was a fully self-contained combiner, something ''Transformers'' didn't manage until the late 90s. Though calling them outright superior will still often get people yelling at you, calling them decent is far more acceptable than it once was.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Evil Is Sexy TRS; this has become an objective, in-universe trope.


* EvilIsSexy: Sort of. The only female [=GoBot=] with a distinctly feminine shape is Crasher, a Renegade.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* MemeticLoser: The [=GoBots=] as a whole have picked up this reputation, due to them being the iconic instance to many 80s kids of a DuelingShows dynamic where one of the shows involved was very clearly the loser, along with the general "lame" feel that percolated a lot of its characters. For a while, ''Transformers'' comics made a habit of killing off random [=GoBots=] seemingly just to salt the wound, and though the outright disdain has mostly dissipated, they're still seen as a low-hanging fruit.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The toyline has gone through an even further reevaluation. For its original run, it was seen as the poverty version of ''Transformers'' favored by the lame kids: the toys were smaller, cheaper, were linked to a lamer cartoon, and had dumb names. It didn't help that the cartoon, unlike ''Transformers'', had pretty toy-accurate character designs, which made it all the more obvious to kids that a lot of the toys had decidedly goofy looks. Retrospectives, meanwhile, tend to recognize that the ''Machine Robo'' molds had some pedigree of their own, and often note that, pound for pound, being smaller than equivalent Transformers was really the only downside to Gobots. They had more varied vehicle modes, less partforming, were more detailed and complex than Transformers in their size class, and some even seemingly outclassed their Transformer counterparts--for instance, Puzzler was a fully self-contained combiner, something ''Transformers'' didn't manage until the late 90s. Though calling them outright superior will still often get people yelling at you, calling them decent is far more acceptable than it once was.

to:

** The toyline has gone through an even further reevaluation. For its original run, it was seen as the poverty version of ''Transformers'' favored by the lame least cool kids: the toys were smaller, cheaper, were linked to a lamer cartoon, and had dumb names. It didn't help that the cartoon, unlike ''Transformers'', had pretty toy-accurate character designs, which made it all the more obvious to kids that a lot of the toys had decidedly goofy looks. Retrospectives, meanwhile, tend to recognize that the ''Machine Robo'' molds had some pedigree of their own, and often note that, pound for pound, being smaller than equivalent Transformers was really the only downside to Gobots. They had more varied vehicle modes, less partforming, were more detailed and complex than Transformers in their size class, and some even seemingly outclassed their Transformer counterparts--for instance, Puzzler was a fully self-contained combiner, something ''Transformers'' didn't manage until the late 90s. Though calling them outright superior will still often get people yelling at you, calling them decent is far more acceptable than it once was.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The toyline has gone through an even further reevaluation. For its original run, it was seen as the poverty version of ''Transformers'' favored by the lame kids: the toys were smaller, cheaper, were linked to a lamer cartoon, and had dumb names. It didn't help that the cartoon, unlike ''Transformers'', had pretty toy-accurate character designs, which made it all the more obvious to kids that a lot of the toys had decidedly goofy designs. Retrospectives, meanwhile, tend to recognize that the ''Machine Robo'' molds had some pedigree of their own, and often note that, pound for pound, being smaller than equivalent Transformers was really the only downside to Gobots. They had more varied vehicle modes, less partforming, were more detailed and complex than Transformers in their size class, and some even seemingly outclassed their Transformer counterparts--for instance, Puzzler was a fully self-contained combiner, something ''Transformers'' didn't manage until the late 90s. Though calling them outright superior will still often get people yelling at you, calling them decent is far more acceptable than it once was.

to:

** The toyline has gone through an even further reevaluation. For its original run, it was seen as the poverty version of ''Transformers'' favored by the lame kids: the toys were smaller, cheaper, were linked to a lamer cartoon, and had dumb names. It didn't help that the cartoon, unlike ''Transformers'', had pretty toy-accurate character designs, which made it all the more obvious to kids that a lot of the toys had decidedly goofy designs.looks. Retrospectives, meanwhile, tend to recognize that the ''Machine Robo'' molds had some pedigree of their own, and often note that, pound for pound, being smaller than equivalent Transformers was really the only downside to Gobots. They had more varied vehicle modes, less partforming, were more detailed and complex than Transformers in their size class, and some even seemingly outclassed their Transformer counterparts--for instance, Puzzler was a fully self-contained combiner, something ''Transformers'' didn't manage until the late 90s. Though calling them outright superior will still often get people yelling at you, calling them decent is far more acceptable than it once was.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The toyline has gone through an even further reevaluation. For its original run, it was seen as the poverty version of ''Transformers'' favored by the lame kids: the toys were smaller, cheaper, were linked to a lamer cartoon, and had dumb names. Retrospectives, meanwhile, tend to recognize that the ''Machine Robo'' molds had some pedigree of their own, and often note that, pound for pound, being smaller than equivalent Transformers was really the only downside to Gobots. They had more varied vehicle modes, less partforming, were more detailed and complex than Transformers in their size class, and some even seemingly outclassed their Transformer counterparts--for instance, Puzzler was a fully self-contained combiner, something ''Transformers'' didn't manage until the late 90s. Though calling them outright superior will still often get people yelling at you, calling them decent is far more acceptable than it once was.

to:

** The toyline has gone through an even further reevaluation. For its original run, it was seen as the poverty version of ''Transformers'' favored by the lame kids: the toys were smaller, cheaper, were linked to a lamer cartoon, and had dumb names. It didn't help that the cartoon, unlike ''Transformers'', had pretty toy-accurate character designs, which made it all the more obvious to kids that a lot of the toys had decidedly goofy designs. Retrospectives, meanwhile, tend to recognize that the ''Machine Robo'' molds had some pedigree of their own, and often note that, pound for pound, being smaller than equivalent Transformers was really the only downside to Gobots. They had more varied vehicle modes, less partforming, were more detailed and complex than Transformers in their size class, and some even seemingly outclassed their Transformer counterparts--for instance, Puzzler was a fully self-contained combiner, something ''Transformers'' didn't manage until the late 90s. Though calling them outright superior will still often get people yelling at you, calling them decent is far more acceptable than it once was.

Changed: 214

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The toyline has gone through an even further reevaluation. For its original run, it was seen as the PoorMansSubstitute for ''Transformers'': the toys were smaller, cheaper, were linked to a lamer cartoon, and had dumb names. Retrospectives, meanwhile, tend to recognize that the ''Machine Robo'' molds had some pedigree of their own, and often note that, pound for pound, being smaller than equivalent Transformers was really the only downside to Gobots: they had more varied vehicle modes, less partforming, and were more detailed and complex than Transformers in their size class. Some even seemingly outclassed their Transformer counterparts--for instance, Puzzler was a fully self-contained combiner, something ''Transformers'' didn't manage until the late 90s.

to:

** The toyline has gone through an even further reevaluation. For its original run, it was seen as the PoorMansSubstitute for ''Transformers'': poverty version of ''Transformers'' favored by the lame kids: the toys were smaller, cheaper, were linked to a lamer cartoon, and had dumb names. Retrospectives, meanwhile, tend to recognize that the ''Machine Robo'' molds had some pedigree of their own, and often note that, pound for pound, being smaller than equivalent Transformers was really the only downside to Gobots: they Gobots. They had more varied vehicle modes, less partforming, and were more detailed and complex than Transformers in their size class. Some class, and some even seemingly outclassed their Transformer counterparts--for instance, Puzzler was a fully self-contained combiner, something ''Transformers'' didn't manage until the late 90s.90s. Though calling them outright superior will still often get people yelling at you, calling them decent is far more acceptable than it once was.

Added: 1132

Changed: 361

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* VindicatedByHistory: In the late 80’s to early 2000’s, people largely saw ''Gobots'' as just a failed ''Transformers'' rip-off. Nowadays, in large part thanks to it [[CanonWelding being folded into]] ''Transformers'', many have given the series a second look and re-evaluated their opinions, regarding it as [[SoOkayItsAverage a decent show that did the best it could at the time]].

to:

* VindicatedByHistory: VindicatedByHistory:
**
In the late 80’s to early 2000’s, people largely saw ''Gobots'' as just a failed ''Transformers'' rip-off. Nowadays, in large part thanks to it [[CanonWelding being folded into]] ''Transformers'', many have given the series a second look and re-evaluated their opinions, regarding it as [[SoOkayItsAverage a decent show that did the best it could at the time]].time]].
** The toyline has gone through an even further reevaluation. For its original run, it was seen as the PoorMansSubstitute for ''Transformers'': the toys were smaller, cheaper, were linked to a lamer cartoon, and had dumb names. Retrospectives, meanwhile, tend to recognize that the ''Machine Robo'' molds had some pedigree of their own, and often note that, pound for pound, being smaller than equivalent Transformers was really the only downside to Gobots: they had more varied vehicle modes, less partforming, and were more detailed and complex than Transformers in their size class. Some even seemingly outclassed their Transformer counterparts--for instance, Puzzler was a fully self-contained combiner, something ''Transformers'' didn't manage until the late 90s.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: Fans have jokingly [[http://www.cybertron.ca/boards/showthread.php?t=39694 interpreted]] the Renegades as heroics rebels fighting against an evil authoritarian regime due to some rather odd illustrations in the Command Center playset.

to:

* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: Fans have jokingly [[http://www.cybertron.ca/boards/showthread.php?t=39694 interpreted]] the Renegades as heroics rebels fighting against an evil authoritarian regime due to some rather odd illustrations in the Command Center playset.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The entire concept of the Rocklords (transforming aliens based on real life minerals like granite or quartz) feels almost eerily similar to ''WesternAnimation/StevenUniverse'', just done in a ''much'' [[SoBadItsGood sillier]] way.

to:

** The entire concept of the Rocklords Rock Lords (transforming aliens based on real life minerals like granite or quartz) feels almost eerily similar to ''WesternAnimation/StevenUniverse'', just done in a ''much'' [[SoBadItsGood sillier]] way.



** The Rocklords in general tend to get a ton of mockery. The whole idea of robots that turn into rocks is just so stupid-sounding to most people that they never really had a chance.
* SoBadItsGood: Rocklords. Think ''Franchise/{{Transformers}}'', but instead becoming something cool like a car, a dinosaur, a plane, or a tank, they became rocks! You could choose between granite, quartz or shale amongst others! The movie really highlights the central issue here - there’s scenes where they transform and roll out... and proceed to slowly clump away down the road like bricks turning under their own power.

to:

** The Rocklords Rock Lords in general tend to get a ton of mockery. The whole idea of robots that turn into rocks is just so stupid-sounding to most people that they never really had a chance.
* SoBadItsGood: Rocklords.The Rock Lords. Think ''Franchise/{{Transformers}}'', but instead becoming something cool like a car, a dinosaur, a plane, or a tank, they became rocks! You could choose between granite, quartz or shale amongst others! The movie really highlights the central issue here - there’s scenes where they transform and roll out... and proceed to slowly clump away down the road like bricks turning under their own power.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** On technical levels, the Transformers cartoon did beat the [=GoBots=] first, while in actual American toylines, [=GoBots=] came first. However, each being based on earlier foreign toylines complicate things even further. In a way, Transformer parts came first, but the first fully formed toy that would be sold as a [=GoBot=] came before the first fully formed to that would be sold as a Transformer. You may see any example brought up in "who came first" debates involving the two franchises.

to:

** On technical levels, the Transformers cartoon did beat the [=GoBots=] first, while in actual American toylines, [=GoBots=] came first. However, each being based on earlier foreign toylines complicate things even further. In a way, Transformer parts came first, but the first fully formed toy that would be sold as a [=GoBot=] came before the first fully formed to toy that would be sold as a Transformer. You may see any example brought up in "who came first" debates involving the two franchises.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** On technical levels, the Transformers cartoon did beat the Gobots first, while in actual American toylines, Gobots came first. However, each being based on earlier foreign toylines complicate things even further. In a way, Transformer parts came first, but the first fully formed toy that would be sold as a GoBot came before the first fully formed to that would be sold as a Transformer. You may see any example brought up in "who came first" debates involving the two franchises.

to:

** On technical levels, the Transformers cartoon did beat the Gobots [=GoBots=] first, while in actual American toylines, Gobots [=GoBots=] came first. However, each being based on earlier foreign toylines complicate things even further. In a way, Transformer parts came first, but the first fully formed toy that would be sold as a GoBot [=GoBot=] came before the first fully formed to that would be sold as a Transformer. You may see any example brought up in "who came first" debates involving the two franchises.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** On technical levels, the Transformers cartoon did beat the Gobots first. While in actual American toylines, Gobots came first. However each being based on earlier foreign toylines complicate it even further. In a way Transformer parts came first, but the first fully formed toy that would be sold as a gobot came before the first fully formed to that would be sold as a tranformer. You may see any example brought up in "who came first" debates involving the two franchises.

to:

** On technical levels, the Transformers cartoon did beat the Gobots first. While first, while in actual American toylines, Gobots came first. However However, each being based on earlier foreign toylines complicate it things even further. In a way way, Transformer parts came first, but the first fully formed toy that would be sold as a gobot GoBot came before the first fully formed to that would be sold as a tranformer.Transformer. You may see any example brought up in "who came first" debates involving the two franchises.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Approved by the thread.

Added DiffLines:

*CompleteMonster--"In Search of Ancient [=GoBonauts=]": [[EvilAllAlong Doctor Cunningham]] is an archeologist who worked for UNECOM and is secretly an undercover Renegade spy. While excavating an ancient pyramid, Cunningham found a spaceship which led to the discovery of the Dark Heart, an {{Antimatter}} weapon created by the "Evil One" that nearly destroyed [=GoBotron=] thousands of years ago. After Scooter, Nick, and AJ helped him find the Dark Heart, Cunningham revealed his true intentions and gave it to Cy-Kill so he can destroy the Guardians. However, Leader-1 managed to talk Cy-Kill out of using it, as the Dark Heart had the potential to rip a hole through the time-space continuum and destroy the entire universe. Cunningham then stole the Dark Heart for himself so he can become "[[OmnicidalManiac the loon that's going to bring the world to an end]]".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not a YMMV trope.


* NonStandardCharacterDesign: When the [[HumanPopsicle Last Engineer and Master Renegade]] are introduced in the second [[FiveEpisodePilot five-part miniseries,]] they look much more like conventional, muscular comic book adventure characters than the relatively toony design of the human characters from the first season.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* SugarWiki/AwesomeMusic: [[https://youtu.be/jA9tl6xtZgg?t=8 Gotta love that Hoyt Curtin theme]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* RetroactiveRecognition: [[Series/StarTrekDeepSpaceNine Constable Odo]] is the Renegades' main human ally.
Willbyr MOD

Added: 441

Changed: 437

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AccidentalInnuendo: In the episode "Genius and Son", Cy-Kill threatens to, in his own words, let Crasher have her way with Braxis. To have one's way with someone happens to be a euphemism for rape.

to:

* AccidentalInnuendo: AccidentalInnuendo:
**
In the episode "Genius and Son", Cy-Kill threatens to, in his own words, let Crasher have her way with Braxis. To have one's way with someone happens to be a euphemism for rape.



* EnsembleDarkhorse: The Renegades in general [[EvilIsCool tend to be better remembered than the Guardians]]. Crasher and Cop-Tur are particularly well-liked; the former for being a fun and interesting DarkActionGirl, the latter for being a lovable IneffectualSympatheticVillain.

to:

* EnsembleDarkhorse: EnsembleDarkhorse:
**
The Renegades in general [[EvilIsCool tend to be better remembered than the Guardians]]. Crasher and Cop-Tur are particularly well-liked; the former for being a fun and interesting DarkActionGirl, the latter for being a lovable IneffectualSympatheticVillain.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* EarWorm: The theme song. It’s lyrics consist entirely of “THE GOBOTS” being shouted repeatedly, yet it somehow manages to be ''incredibly'' catchy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Among the Guardians, Path Finder seems to be the most popular, for being a cool girl with a unique look and a toy that pretty much blows her ''Transformers'' counterpart Cosmos out of the water.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Puzzler, the Renegade counterpart to Courageous, never reappeared after his début episode.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The end of "The Third Column" ends with Zero stating that the Guardians and Renegades haven't seen the last of him, implying that he'll return to cause more trouble. His only other appearance was in a flashback in "Et Tu, Cy-Kill?", and even then he only appeared for less than a minute.

to:

** The end of "The Third Column" ends with Zero stating that the Guardians and Renegades haven't seen the last of him, implying that he'll return to cause more trouble. His only other appearance was in a flashback in "Et Tu, Cy-Kill?", and even then he only appeared for less than a minute.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* NonStandardCharacterDesign: When the [[HumanPopsicle Last Engineer and Master Renegade]] are introduced in the second [[FiveEpisodePilot five-part miniseries,]] they look much more like conventional, muscular comic book adventure characters than the relatively toony design of the human characters from the first season.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The end of "The Third Column" ends with Zero stating that the Guardians and Renegades haven't seen the last of him, implying that he'll return to cause more trouble. His only other appearance was in a flashback in "Et Tu, Cy-Kill?", and even then he only appeared for less than a minute.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Narm: The hands in the cartoon were a little too [[ShowAccuracyToyAccuracy toy accurate]] to take seriously.

to:

* Narm: {{Narm}}: The hands in the cartoon were a little too [[ShowAccuracyToyAccuracy toy accurate]] to take seriously.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Narm: The hands in the cartoon were a little too [[ShowAccuracyToyAccuracy toy accurate]] to take seriously.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter: Steamer, a Renegade who did a HeelFaceTurn and became a Guardian, only showed up in one episode.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The Renegade Zero appears in only 2 episodes (one of which he's in for less than 1 minute) but watchers latched on to him for being a genuinely competent villain.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
It's been decided that only video game and toy examples are allowed for Most Annoying Sound.


* MostAnnoyingSound: ''Scooter’s voice''. One really wonders what Creator/FrankWelker was thinking when he thought it up.

Top