Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Cleanup of Talking To Himself to Acting For Two, while moving example to appropriate trope but feel free to revert if necessary. Long Title cleanup too.
Changed line(s) 34 (click to see context) from:
* ActuallyPrettyFunny: In-universe. [[spoiler: After the trial, Sonata admits to Phoenix that during their encounter in her hotel room, all the times she cringed at Pinkie's eccentricities were actually attempts to hold in her laughter.]]
to:
* ActorAllusion: The Judge and the original [[AudioPlay/DoctorWhoovesAndAssistant Dr. Whooves]] share the same voice actor, Keikoandgilly, with the former noticing that he has been staring at him for some time, but is afraid to talk to him for fear that it might [[RealityBreakingParadox cause some sort of paradox]]. This implies the two characters are alternate selves of one another, while also defying ActingForTwo.[[invoked]]
* ActuallyPrettyFunny:In-universe. [[spoiler: After the trial, Sonata admits to Phoenix that during their encounter in her hotel room, all the times she cringed at Pinkie's eccentricities were actually attempts to hold in her laughter.]]
* ActuallyPrettyFunny:
Changed line(s) 38 (click to see context) from:
* AlliterativeTitle: Twilight's ''[[LongTitle Super Spectacular Stupendous Spontaneous Summoning Scripture Signals and You]]''.
to:
* AlliterativeTitle: Twilight's ''[[LongTitle Super ''Super Spectacular Stupendous Spontaneous Summoning Scripture Signals and You]]''.You''.
Deleted line(s) 448 (click to see context) :
** The Judge being afraid that speaking with [[AudioPlay/DoctorWhoovesAndAssistant Doctor Whooves]] [[TalkingToHimself might create some sort of paradox]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
placed a more fitting link into Bread, Eggs, Milk, Squick..., and to a page that actually exists
Changed line(s) 103 (click to see context) from:
-->''"Toupees, [[MakeTheDogTestify birds]], [[WhipItGood whips]]..."''
to:
-->''"Toupees, [[MakeTheDogTestify birds]], [[WhipItGood [[WhipOfDominance whips]]..."''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Deleted line(s) 524 (click to see context) :
* NoPronunciationGuide: An odd example; as with most people who read the word "Psyche-locks" aloud, the voice actors call them "Psych-locks".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
[[caption-width-right:350:''[[{{Tagline}} Just when you thought the]] [[VideoGame/ProfessorLayton Layton]] [[VideoGame/ProfessorLaytonVSAceAttorney crossover]] [[IntercontinuityCrossover was weird]].'']]
to:
[[caption-width-right:350:''[[{{Tagline}} Just when you thought the]] [[VideoGame/ProfessorLayton Layton]] [[VideoGame/ProfessorLaytonVSAceAttorney crossover]] [[IntercontinuityCrossover [[WeirdCrossover was weird]].'']]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Deleted line(s) 171,173 (click to see context) :
* CourtroomAntic:
** Phoenix is on the case, what else can you expect?
** Trixie also knows her handful of antics too. For instance, she does the typical "hold on to the evidence until a contradiction is found" trick so popular within ''Ace Attorney'' prosecutors.
** Phoenix is on the case, what else can you expect?
** Trixie also knows her handful of antics too. For instance, she does the typical "hold on to the evidence until a contradiction is found" trick so popular within ''Ace Attorney'' prosecutors.
Added DiffLines:
* UnconventionalCourtroomTactics: Trixie does the typical "hold on to the evidence until a contradiction is found" trick so popular within ''Ace Attorney'' prosecutors.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Cry Cute now dewicked
Deleted line(s) 180 (click to see context) :
* CryCute: Rainbow after Fluttershy's speech when the trial is over. [[SandInMyEyes Not like she'll admit it mind you]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 745 (click to see context) from:
* SugarBowl: As far as [[Franchise/AceAttorney Phoenix]] is concerned, he is stuck in one; the colorful equine filled [[WesternAnimation/MyLittlePonyFriendshipIsMagic Equestria]]. It is so cutesy and peaceful that [[spoiler: not only is the defendant innocent but everyone else is too; the "murder" really was an accident]]. As far as ''Equestria's'' concerned however, the real one is overseas; a land where ponies and humans coexist. [[TastesLikeDiabetes Twilight is embarrassed by just mentioning that place]].
to:
* SugarBowl: As far as [[Franchise/AceAttorney Phoenix]] is concerned, he is stuck in one; the colorful equine filled [[WesternAnimation/MyLittlePonyFriendshipIsMagic Equestria]]. It is so cutesy and peaceful that [[spoiler: not only is the defendant innocent but everyone else is too; the "murder" really was an accident]]. As far as ''Equestria's'' concerned however, the real one is overseas; a land where ponies and humans coexist. [[TastesLikeDiabetes [[SickeninglySweet Twilight is embarrassed by just mentioning that place]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* KarmaHoudini: Trixie puts everyone through the absolute ''wringer'', down to [[spoiler:loudly and excessively gloating when it looks like she's gotten a guilty verdict]]. Her punishment? Rainbow is a bit disdainful of her. That's ''it.''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Up To Eleven is a defunct trope
Changed line(s) 146 (click to see context) from:
* {{Cloudcuckoolander}}: Pinkie Pie, naturally. This aspect of her reminds Phoenix of Maya Fey with the loopiness TurnedUpToEleven.
to:
* {{Cloudcuckoolander}}: Pinkie Pie, naturally. This aspect of her reminds Phoenix of Maya Fey with the loopiness TurnedUpToEleven.taken up a notch.
Changed line(s) 691 (click to see context) from:
* ShrinkingViolet: Fluttershy's shyness is taken UpToEleven in ''Part 2''. She attempts to hide under the witness podium whenever anyone addresses her, except Phoenix, due to her thinking he actually is a phoenix.
to:
* ShrinkingViolet: Fluttershy's shyness is taken UpToEleven exaggerated in ''Part 2''. She attempts to hide under the witness podium whenever anyone addresses her, except Phoenix, due to her thinking he actually is a phoenix.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
A sequel series, ''WebAnimation/ElementsOfJustice'', was released on June 5, 2019.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* AccidentalMurder: The final reveal of [[spoiler:Ace Swift ending up being killed by a thunderbolt discharging from a volatile thunder-cloud that Rainbow Dash had unwittingly left parked next to him could still open up Dash to charges of ''negligent'' homicide]]. This possibility is however [[NoEndorHolocaust not brought up at any point]].
Added DiffLines:
* ConvictionByContradiction: The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) [[GuiltyUntilSomeoneElseIsGuilty struggle to present evidence implicating a person other than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of Equestria's (and by logical extension, ''Ace Attonerney's'' pseudo-Japanese setting's) legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as [[MotiveEqualsConclusiveEvidence Dash's possible motive]] as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift still had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place - in a world where flying, teleportation magic and electrocution spells exist, mind you;[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving the killing of Ace Swift by Dash (and that said killing constituted ''murder'' rather than, say, manslaughter) ''beyond'' reasonable doubt rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie;[[note]]beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions, and continuing with the fact that murder generally requires intent; for that conundrum, see below;[[/note]] it's ''not'' on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift had electrocuted himself]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not a usable trope
Deleted line(s) 51,53 (click to see context) :
* ArtisticLicenceLaw:
** The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) [[GuiltyUntilSomeoneElseIsGuilty struggle to present evidence implicating a person other than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of Equestria's (and by logical extension, ''Ace Attonerney's'' pseudo-Japanese setting's) legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as [[MotiveEqualsConclusiveEvidence Dash's possible motive]] as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift still had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place - in a world where flying, teleportation magic and electrocution spells exist, mind you;[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving the killing of Ace Swift by Dash (and that said killing constituted ''murder'' rather than, say, manslaughter) ''beyond'' reasonable doubt rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie;[[note]]beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions, and continuing with the fact that murder generally requires intent; for that conundrum, see below;[[/note]] it's ''not'' on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift had electrocuted himself]].
** Likewise, the final reveal of [[spoiler:Ace Swift ending up being killed by a thunderbolt discharging from a volatile thunder-cloud that Rainbow Dash had unwittingly left parked next to him could still open up Dash to charges of ''[[AccidentalMurder negligent]]'' homicide]]. This possibility is however [[NoEndorHolocaust not brought up at any point]].
** The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) [[GuiltyUntilSomeoneElseIsGuilty struggle to present evidence implicating a person other than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of Equestria's (and by logical extension, ''Ace Attonerney's'' pseudo-Japanese setting's) legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as [[MotiveEqualsConclusiveEvidence Dash's possible motive]] as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift still had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place - in a world where flying, teleportation magic and electrocution spells exist, mind you;[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving the killing of Ace Swift by Dash (and that said killing constituted ''murder'' rather than, say, manslaughter) ''beyond'' reasonable doubt rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie;[[note]]beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions, and continuing with the fact that murder generally requires intent; for that conundrum, see below;[[/note]] it's ''not'' on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift had electrocuted himself]].
** Likewise, the final reveal of [[spoiler:Ace Swift ending up being killed by a thunderbolt discharging from a volatile thunder-cloud that Rainbow Dash had unwittingly left parked next to him could still open up Dash to charges of ''[[AccidentalMurder negligent]]'' homicide]]. This possibility is however [[NoEndorHolocaust not brought up at any point]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 52 (click to see context) from:
** The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) [[GuiltyUntilSomeoneElseIsGuilty struggle to present evidence implicating a person other than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of Equestria's (and by logical extension, ''Ace Attonerney's'' pseudo-Japanese setting's) legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift still had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place - in a world where flying, teleportation magic and electrocution spells exist, mind you;[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving the killing of Ace Swift by Dash (and that said killing constituted ''murder'' rather than, say, manslaughter) ''beyond'' reasonable doubt rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie;[[note]]beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions, and continuing with the fact that murder generally requires intent; for that conundrum, see below;[[/note]] it's ''not'' on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift had electrocuted himself]].
to:
** The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) [[GuiltyUntilSomeoneElseIsGuilty struggle to present evidence implicating a person other than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of Equestria's (and by logical extension, ''Ace Attonerney's'' pseudo-Japanese setting's) legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as [[MotiveEqualsConclusiveEvidence Dash's possible motive motive]] as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift still had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place - in a world where flying, teleportation magic and electrocution spells exist, mind you;[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving the killing of Ace Swift by Dash (and that said killing constituted ''murder'' rather than, say, manslaughter) ''beyond'' reasonable doubt rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie;[[note]]beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions, and continuing with the fact that murder generally requires intent; for that conundrum, see below;[[/note]] it's ''not'' on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift had electrocuted himself]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 53 (click to see context) from:
** Likewise, the final reveal of [[spoiler:Ace Swift ending up being killed by a thunderbolt discharging from a charged thunder-cloud that Rainbow Dash had unwittingly left parked next to him could still open up Dash to charges of ''[[AccidentalMurder negligent]]'' homicide]]. This possibility is however [[NoEndorHolocaust not brought up at any point]].
to:
** Likewise, the final reveal of [[spoiler:Ace Swift ending up being killed by a thunderbolt discharging from a charged volatile thunder-cloud that Rainbow Dash had unwittingly left parked next to him could still open up Dash to charges of ''[[AccidentalMurder negligent]]'' homicide]]. This possibility is however [[NoEndorHolocaust not brought up at any point]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 52 (click to see context) from:
** The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) [[GuiltyUntilSomeoneElseIsGuilty struggle to present evidence implicating a person other than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of Equestria's (and by logical extension, ''Ace Attonerney's'' pseudo-Japanese setting's) legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift still had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place - in a world where flying, teleportation magic and electrocution spells exist, mind you;[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving the killing of Ace Swift by Dash (and that said killing constituted ''murder'' rather than, say, manslaughter) ''beyond'' reasonable doubt rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie;[[note]]beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions, and continuing with the fact that murder generally requires intent; for that conundrum, see below;[[/note]] it's ''not'' on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift had ended up electrocuting himself]].
to:
** The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) [[GuiltyUntilSomeoneElseIsGuilty struggle to present evidence implicating a person other than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of Equestria's (and by logical extension, ''Ace Attonerney's'' pseudo-Japanese setting's) legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift still had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place - in a world where flying, teleportation magic and electrocution spells exist, mind you;[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving the killing of Ace Swift by Dash (and that said killing constituted ''murder'' rather than, say, manslaughter) ''beyond'' reasonable doubt rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie;[[note]]beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions, and continuing with the fact that murder generally requires intent; for that conundrum, see below;[[/note]] it's ''not'' on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift had ended up electrocuting electrocuted himself]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 52 (click to see context) from:
** The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) [[GuiltyUntilSomeoneElseIsGuilty struggle to present evidence implicating a person other than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of Equestria's (and by logical extension, ''Ace Attonerney's'' pseudo-Japanese setting's) legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift still had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place - in a world where flying, teleportation magic and electrocution spells exist, mind you;[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving the killing of Ace Swift's by Dash (and that said killing constituted ''murder'' rather than, say, manslaughter) ''beyond'' reasonable doubt rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie;[[note]]beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions, and continuing with the fact that murder generally requires intent; for that conundrum, see below;[[/note]] it's ''not'' on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift had ended up electrocuting himself]].
to:
** The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) [[GuiltyUntilSomeoneElseIsGuilty struggle to present evidence implicating a person other than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of Equestria's (and by logical extension, ''Ace Attonerney's'' pseudo-Japanese setting's) legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift still had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place - in a world where flying, teleportation magic and electrocution spells exist, mind you;[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving the killing of Ace Swift's Swift by Dash (and that said killing constituted ''murder'' rather than, say, manslaughter) ''beyond'' reasonable doubt rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie;[[note]]beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions, and continuing with the fact that murder generally requires intent; for that conundrum, see below;[[/note]] it's ''not'' on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift had ended up electrocuting himself]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 52 (click to see context) from:
** The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of Equestria's (and by logical extension, ''Ace Attonerney's'' pseudo-Japanese setting's) legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift still had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place - in a world where flying, teleportation magic and electrocution spells exist, mind you;[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving the killing of Ace Swift's by Dash (and that said killing constituted ''murder'' rather than, say, manslaughter) ''beyond'' reasonable doubt rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie;[[note]]beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions, and continuing with the fact that murder generally requires intent; for that conundrum, see below;[[/note]] it's ''not'' on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift had ended up electrocuting himself]].
to:
** The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) [[GuiltyUntilSomeoneElseIsGuilty struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' other than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]].name]]]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of Equestria's (and by logical extension, ''Ace Attonerney's'' pseudo-Japanese setting's) legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift still had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place - in a world where flying, teleportation magic and electrocution spells exist, mind you;[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving the killing of Ace Swift's by Dash (and that said killing constituted ''murder'' rather than, say, manslaughter) ''beyond'' reasonable doubt rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie;[[note]]beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions, and continuing with the fact that murder generally requires intent; for that conundrum, see below;[[/note]] it's ''not'' on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift had ended up electrocuting himself]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 52 (click to see context) from:
** The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of Equestria's (and by logical extension, ''Ace Attonerney's'' setting's) legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift still had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place - in a world where flying, teleportation magic and electrocution spells exist, mind you;[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving the killing of Ace Swift's by Dash (and that said killing constituted ''murder'' rather than, say, manslaughter) ''beyond'' reasonable doubt rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie;[[note]]beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions, and continuing with the fact that murder generally requires intent; for that conundrum, see below;[[/note]] it's ''not'' on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift ended up electrocuting himself]].
to:
** The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of Equestria's (and by logical extension, ''Ace Attonerney's'' pseudo-Japanese setting's) legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift still had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place - in a world where flying, teleportation magic and electrocution spells exist, mind you;[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving the killing of Ace Swift's by Dash (and that said killing constituted ''murder'' rather than, say, manslaughter) ''beyond'' reasonable doubt rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie;[[note]]beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions, and continuing with the fact that murder generally requires intent; for that conundrum, see below;[[/note]] it's ''not'' on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift had ended up electrocuting himself]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 52 (click to see context) from:
** The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of Equestria's (and by logical extension, ''Ace Attonerney's'' setting's) legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift still had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place - in a world where flying, teleportation magic and electrocution spells exist, mind you;[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving the killing of Ace Swift's by Dash (and that said killing constituted ''murder'' rather than, say, manslaughter) ''beyond'' reasonable doubt rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie;[[note]]beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions, and continuing with the fact that murder generally requires intent; for that condundrum, see below;[[/note]] it's ''not'' on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion. This principle turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift ended up electrocuting himself]].
to:
** The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of Equestria's (and by logical extension, ''Ace Attonerney's'' setting's) legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift still had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place - in a world where flying, teleportation magic and electrocution spells exist, mind you;[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving the killing of Ace Swift's by Dash (and that said killing constituted ''murder'' rather than, say, manslaughter) ''beyond'' reasonable doubt rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie;[[note]]beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions, and continuing with the fact that murder generally requires intent; for that condundrum, conundrum, see below;[[/note]] it's ''not'' on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion.suspicion]]. This principle turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift ended up electrocuting himself]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 52 (click to see context) from:
** The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of Equestria's (and by logical extension, ''Ace Attonerney's'' setting's) legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift still had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place - in a world where flying, teleportation magic and electrocution spells exist, mind you;[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving the killing of Ace Swift's by Dash (and that said killing constituted ''murder'' rather than, say, manslaughter) ''beyond'' reasonable doubt rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie;[[note]]beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions, and continuing with the fact that murder generally requires intent; for that condundrum, see below;[[/note]] it's ''not'' on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion (at least beyond that threshold)]]. This principle turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift ended up electrocuting himself]].
to:
** The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of Equestria's (and by logical extension, ''Ace Attonerney's'' setting's) legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift still had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place - in a world where flying, teleportation magic and electrocution spells exist, mind you;[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving the killing of Ace Swift's by Dash (and that said killing constituted ''murder'' rather than, say, manslaughter) ''beyond'' reasonable doubt rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie;[[note]]beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions, and continuing with the fact that murder generally requires intent; for that condundrum, see below;[[/note]] it's ''not'' on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion (at least beyond that threshold)]].suspicion. This principle turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift ended up electrocuting himself]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 52 (click to see context) from:
** The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of Equestria's (and by logical extension, ''Ace Attonerney's'' setting's) legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift still had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place - in a world where flying, teleportation magic and electrocution spells exist, mind you;[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving the killing of Ace Swift's by Dash (and that said killing constituted ''murder'' rather than, say, manslaughter) ''beyond'' reasonable doubt rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie;[[note]]beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions, not to mention the fact that murder generally requires intent; for that condundrum, see below;[[/note]] it's ''not'' on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion (at least beyond that threshold)]]. This principle turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift ended up electrocuting himself]].
to:
** The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of Equestria's (and by logical extension, ''Ace Attonerney's'' setting's) legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift still had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place - in a world where flying, teleportation magic and electrocution spells exist, mind you;[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving the killing of Ace Swift's by Dash (and that said killing constituted ''murder'' rather than, say, manslaughter) ''beyond'' reasonable doubt rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie;[[note]]beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions, not to mention and continuing with the fact that murder generally requires intent; for that condundrum, see below;[[/note]] it's ''not'' on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion (at least beyond that threshold)]]. This principle turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift ended up electrocuting himself]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 52,53 (click to see context) from:
** The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of Equestria's (and by logical extension, ''Ace Attonerney's'' setting's) legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift still had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place - in a world where flying, teleportation magic and electrocution spells exist, mind you[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving the killing of Ace Swift's by Dash (and that said killing constituted ''murder'' rather than, say, manslaughter) ''beyond'' reasonable doubt rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie;[[note]]beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions, not to mention the fact that murder generally requires intent; for that condundrum, see below[[/note]] it's ''not'' on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift ended up electrocuting himself]].
** Likewise, the final reveal of [[spoiler:Ace Swift ending up being killed by a thunderbolt discharging from a charged thunder-cloud that Rainbow Dash had carelessly parked next to him could still open up Dash to charges of ''[[AccidentalMurder negligent]]'' homicide]]. This possibility is however [[NoEndorHolocaust not brought up at any point]].
** Likewise, the final reveal of [[spoiler:Ace Swift ending up being killed by a thunderbolt discharging from a charged thunder-cloud that Rainbow Dash had carelessly parked next to him could still open up Dash to charges of ''[[AccidentalMurder negligent]]'' homicide]]. This possibility is however [[NoEndorHolocaust not brought up at any point]].
to:
** The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of Equestria's (and by logical extension, ''Ace Attonerney's'' setting's) legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift still had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place - in a world where flying, teleportation magic and electrocution spells exist, mind you[[/note]] you;[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving the killing of Ace Swift's by Dash (and that said killing constituted ''murder'' rather than, say, manslaughter) ''beyond'' reasonable doubt rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie;[[note]]beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions, not to mention the fact that murder generally requires intent; for that condundrum, see below[[/note]] below;[[/note]] it's ''not'' on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]].suspicion (at least beyond that threshold)]]. This principle turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift ended up electrocuting himself]].
** Likewise, the final reveal of [[spoiler:Ace Swift ending up being killed by a thunderbolt discharging from a charged thunder-cloud that Rainbow Dash hadcarelessly unwittingly left parked next to him could still open up Dash to charges of ''[[AccidentalMurder negligent]]'' homicide]]. This possibility is however [[NoEndorHolocaust not brought up at any point]].
** Likewise, the final reveal of [[spoiler:Ace Swift ending up being killed by a thunderbolt discharging from a charged thunder-cloud that Rainbow Dash had
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 52 (click to see context) from:
** The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of Equestria's (and by logical extension, ''Ace Attonerney's'' setting's) legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing (much less explicity ''murder'' rather than, say, manslaughter), whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift still had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place - in a world where flying, teleportation magic and electrocution spells exist, mind you[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions and her intent - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie; it's not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift ended up electrocuting himself]].
to:
** The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of Equestria's (and by logical extension, ''Ace Attonerney's'' setting's) legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing (much less explicity ''murder'' rather than, say, manslaughter), killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift still had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place - in a world where flying, teleportation magic and electrocution spells exist, mind you[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving Dash's participation in the killing of Ace Swift's death by Dash (and that said killing constituted ''murder'' rather than, say, manslaughter) ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie;[[note]]beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions and her intent - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie; actions, not to mention the fact that murder generally requires intent; for that condundrum, see below[[/note]] it's not ''not'' on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift ended up electrocuting himself]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 52,53 (click to see context) from:
** The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of Equestria's (and by logical extension, ''Ace Attonerney's'' setting's) legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift still had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place - in a world where flying, teleportation magic and electrocution spells exist, mind you[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie; it's not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift ended up electrocuting himself]].
** Likewise, the final reveal of [[spoiler:Ace Swift ending up being killed by a thunderbolt discharging from a charged thunder-cloud that Rainbow Dash had carelessly parked next to him could still open up Rainbow Dash to charges of ''[[AccidentalMurder negligent]]'' homicide]]. This possibility is however [[NoEndorHolocaust not brought up at any point]].
** Likewise, the final reveal of [[spoiler:Ace Swift ending up being killed by a thunderbolt discharging from a charged thunder-cloud that Rainbow Dash had carelessly parked next to him could still open up Rainbow Dash to charges of ''[[AccidentalMurder negligent]]'' homicide]]. This possibility is however [[NoEndorHolocaust not brought up at any point]].
to:
** The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of Equestria's (and by logical extension, ''Ace Attonerney's'' setting's) legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, killing (much less explicity ''murder'' rather than, say, manslaughter), whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift still had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place - in a world where flying, teleportation magic and electrocution spells exist, mind you[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions and her intent - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie; it's not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift ended up electrocuting himself]].
** Likewise, the final reveal of [[spoiler:Ace Swift ending up being killed by a thunderbolt discharging from a charged thunder-cloud that Rainbow Dash had carelessly parked next to him could still open upRainbow Dash to charges of ''[[AccidentalMurder negligent]]'' homicide]]. This possibility is however [[NoEndorHolocaust not brought up at any point]].
** Likewise, the final reveal of [[spoiler:Ace Swift ending up being killed by a thunderbolt discharging from a charged thunder-cloud that Rainbow Dash had carelessly parked next to him could still open up
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 52 (click to see context) from:
** The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of Equestria's (and by logical extension, ''Ace Attonerney's'' setting's) legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift still had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place - in a world where teleportation magic and electrocution spells exist, mind you[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie; it's not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift ended up electrocuting himself]].
to:
** The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of Equestria's (and by logical extension, ''Ace Attonerney's'' setting's) legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift still had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place - in a world where flying, teleportation magic and electrocution spells exist, mind you[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie; it's not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift ended up electrocuting himself]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 52 (click to see context) from:
** The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of Equestria's (and by logical extension, ''Ace Attonerney's'' setting's) legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift still had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie; it's not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift ended up electrocuting himself]].
to:
** The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of Equestria's (and by logical extension, ''Ace Attonerney's'' setting's) legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift still had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place[[/note]] place - in a world where teleportation magic and electrocution spells exist, mind you[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie; it's not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift ended up electrocuting himself]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 52 (click to see context) from:
** The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of Equestria's (and by logical extension, ''Ace Attonerney's'' setting's) legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift still had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie; it's not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift ended up electrocuting himself'')]].
to:
** The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of Equestria's (and by logical extension, ''Ace Attonerney's'' setting's) legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift still had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie; it's not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift ended up electrocuting himself'')]].himself]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 52,53 (click to see context) from:
** The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of Equestria's (and by logical extension, ''Ace Attonerney's'' setting's) legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift still had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie; it's not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift ended up electrocuting himself]]'')]].
** Likewise, the final reveal of [[spoiler:Ace Swift ending up being killed by a thunderbolt discharging from a charged thunder-cloud that Rainbow Dash had carelessly parked next to him could still open up Rainbow Dash to charges of ''negligent'' homicide]]. This possibility is however [[NoEndorHolocaust not brought up at any point]].
** Likewise, the final reveal of [[spoiler:Ace Swift ending up being killed by a thunderbolt discharging from a charged thunder-cloud that Rainbow Dash had carelessly parked next to him could still open up Rainbow Dash to charges of ''negligent'' homicide]]. This possibility is however [[NoEndorHolocaust not brought up at any point]].
to:
** The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of Equestria's (and by logical extension, ''Ace Attonerney's'' setting's) legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift still had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie; it's not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift ended up electrocuting himself]]'')]].
himself'')]].
** Likewise, the final reveal of [[spoiler:Ace Swift ending up being killed by a thunderbolt discharging from a charged thunder-cloud that Rainbow Dash had carelessly parked next to him could still open up Rainbow Dash to charges of''negligent'' ''[[AccidentalMurder negligent]]'' homicide]]. This possibility is however [[NoEndorHolocaust not brought up at any point]].
** Likewise, the final reveal of [[spoiler:Ace Swift ending up being killed by a thunderbolt discharging from a charged thunder-cloud that Rainbow Dash had carelessly parked next to him could still open up Rainbow Dash to charges of
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 52 (click to see context) from:
** The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of Equestria's (and by logical extension, ''Ace Attonerney's'' setting's) legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift still had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie; it's not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift was killed due to ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vis_major vis major]]'')]].
to:
** The story climaxes in Parts 4 and 5 when [[spoiler:Phoenix and Twilight (initially) struggle to present evidence implicating a person ''other'' than Dash in the murder and thereby clearing her name]]. Though it ''could'' be explained away as a quirk of Equestria's (and by logical extension, ''Ace Attonerney's'' setting's) legal system, this violates a central tenet of RealLife criminal law, ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_dubio_pro_reo in dubio pro reo]]'' (When In Doubt, For The Accused). [[spoiler: At this point in the trial, the defence has already successfully dismantled much of the alleged evidence linking Dash to the killing, whittling the prosecution's case down to circumstantial evidence such as Dash's possible motive as well as her presence near the crime scene - both of which make for a laughably flimsy case on their own merit[[note]]After all, Ace Swift still had ''several'' enemies and was killed in a publicly accessible place[[/note]] and offer plenty of grounds for an acquittal. The burden of proving Dash's participation in Ace Swift's death ''beyond'' reasonable doubt - beginning with reliably establishing the causality of Dash's actions - rests squarely with prosecutor Trixie; it's not on the defence to remove every last shred of suspicion]]. This principle turns out to be ''very'' well-advised when [[spoiler:it is ultimately revealed that Ace Swift was killed due to ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vis_major vis major]]'')]].ended up electrocuting himself]]'')]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 53 (click to see context) from:
** Likewise, the final reveal of [[spoiler:Ace Swift ending up being killed by a thunderbolt discharging from a charged thunder-cloud that Rainbow Dash carelessly parked next to him could still open up Rainbow Dash to charges of negligent homicide]]. This possibility is however [[NoEndorHolocaust not brought up at any point]].
to:
** Likewise, the final reveal of [[spoiler:Ace Swift ending up being killed by a thunderbolt discharging from a charged thunder-cloud that Rainbow Dash had carelessly parked next to him could still open up Rainbow Dash to charges of negligent ''negligent'' homicide]]. This possibility is however [[NoEndorHolocaust not brought up at any point]].