History UsefulNotes / JapanesePoliticalSystem

1st Jul '17 4:50:46 PM nombretomado
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* There are a few third parties worthy of note, though none of them have the influence of the LDP or DPJ (many thanks to TheOtherWiki for the info):

to:

* There are a few third parties worthy of note, though none of them have the influence of the LDP or DPJ (many thanks to TheOtherWiki Wiki/TheOtherWiki for the info):
3rd Jun '17 9:38:31 AM nombretomado
Is there an issue? Send a Message


Relevant to TVTropes, this answers a question or two a reader may have had - "Hey, why do so many entertainment companies in Japan these days focus so much on "kiddie" entertainment that works for adults, too? Or why is so much anime made for {{otaku}} in the style of the cartoons they used to like, when a fair amount of anime ''was'' made for kids back then?" Well, the answer is simple: ''there are practically more otaku than kids nowadays''. Anime has taken [[{{Moe}} different]] [[{{Lolicon}} bents]] in the past decade or so because the kids who grew up have a lot more buying power, and because ''the number of new kids to sell products to has been going down constantly''. Many companies are abandoning children's programming altogether or "diversifying" their products (see: Nintendo's "for everyone" approach with the [[UsefulNotes/NintendoDS DS]] and [[UsefulNotes/NintendoWii Wii]]) simply because the money isn't there in the kid market anymore, and it doesn't look like it will be there any time soon. This isn't to say that ''everyone'' has abandoned the market - ''Magazine/ShonenJump'' and whatnot still exist, after all - but the kids market is getting ever-smaller and the entertainment products of Japan have been changing to reflect that. (And even SJ, for example, has seen a readership decline over the past two decades simply due to, well, a lack of available shonen.)

to:

Relevant to TVTropes, Wiki/TVTropes, this answers a question or two a reader may have had - "Hey, why do so many entertainment companies in Japan these days focus so much on "kiddie" entertainment that works for adults, too? Or why is so much anime made for {{otaku}} in the style of the cartoons they used to like, when a fair amount of anime ''was'' made for kids back then?" Well, the answer is simple: ''there are practically more otaku than kids nowadays''. Anime has taken [[{{Moe}} different]] [[{{Lolicon}} bents]] in the past decade or so because the kids who grew up have a lot more buying power, and because ''the number of new kids to sell products to has been going down constantly''. Many companies are abandoning children's programming altogether or "diversifying" their products (see: Nintendo's "for everyone" approach with the [[UsefulNotes/NintendoDS DS]] and [[UsefulNotes/NintendoWii Wii]]) simply because the money isn't there in the kid market anymore, and it doesn't look like it will be there any time soon. This isn't to say that ''everyone'' has abandoned the market - ''Magazine/ShonenJump'' and whatnot still exist, after all - but the kids market is getting ever-smaller and the entertainment products of Japan have been changing to reflect that. (And even SJ, for example, has seen a readership decline over the past two decades simply due to, well, a lack of available shonen.)
20th Feb '17 4:22:04 PM Lukethehedgehog
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* The '''Liberal-Democratic Party''' ('''LDP'''): Actually quite conservative[[note]]This is not actually a NonIndicativeName. The reason they are referred to as "Liberal" is because they are using a different definition of "Liberal". Whereas Americans use the term "Liberal" to refer to a school of thought originally referred to as [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_liberalism social liberalism]] that branched off of [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_liberalism classical liberalism]] during the Great Depression, which was eventually shortened to just "liberalism", whereas the LDP follows [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_conservatism liberal conservatism]], which, as you can probably tell by the name, was shortened to just "conservatism" in the US[[/note]]. Comparable to the British Tories and American Republicans. Places an emphasis on free market (neoliberal) capitalism and traditional social mores. Most prime ministers after UsefulNotes/WorldWarTwo came from the LDP - it led the country from its foundation in 1955 (through the merger of the Liberal and Japan Democratic parties), until it lost its first election in ''1993'' (but ended up back in power in 1994 after the opposition coalition collapsed, forming a coalition government with their ArchNemesis the Socialists). For this reason, some people call Japan a "One-and-a-half Party State". The LDP lost by a spectacular landslide in 2009, but returned by another spectacular landslide in 2012.

to:

* The '''Liberal-Democratic Party''' ('''LDP'''): Actually quite conservative[[note]]This is not actually a NonIndicativeName. The reason they are referred to as "Liberal" "liberal" is because they are using a different definition of "Liberal". the term. Whereas Americans use the term "Liberal" "liberal" to refer to a school of thought originally referred to as [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_liberalism social liberalism]] that branched off of [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_liberalism classical liberalism]] during the Great Depression, which was eventually shortened to just "liberalism", whereas the LDP follows [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_conservatism liberal conservatism]], which, as you can probably tell by the name, was shortened to just "conservatism" in the US[[/note]]. Comparable to the British Tories and American Republicans. Places an emphasis on free market (neoliberal) capitalism and traditional social mores. Most prime ministers after UsefulNotes/WorldWarTwo came from the LDP - it led the country from its foundation in 1955 (through the merger of the Liberal and Japan Democratic parties), until it lost its first election in ''1993'' (but ended up back in power in 1994 after the opposition coalition collapsed, forming a coalition government with their ArchNemesis the Socialists). For this reason, some people call Japan a "One-and-a-half Party State". The LDP lost by a spectacular landslide in 2009, but returned by another spectacular landslide in 2012.
20th Feb '17 4:20:44 PM Lukethehedgehog
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* The '''Liberal-Democratic Party''' ('''LDP'''): Actually quite conservative. Comparable to the British Tories and American Republicans. Places an emphasis on capitalism and traditional social mores. Most prime ministers after UsefulNotes/WorldWarTwo came from the LDP - it led the country from its foundation in 1955 (through the merger of the Liberal and Japan Democratic parties), until it lost its first election in ''1993'' (but ended up back in power in 1994 after the opposition coalition collapsed, forming a coalition government with their ArchNemesis the Socialists). For this reason, some people call Japan a "One-and-a-half Party State". The LDP lost by a spectacular landslide in 2009, but returned by another spectacular landslide in 2012.

to:

* The '''Liberal-Democratic Party''' ('''LDP'''): Actually quite conservative.conservative[[note]]This is not actually a NonIndicativeName. The reason they are referred to as "Liberal" is because they are using a different definition of "Liberal". Whereas Americans use the term "Liberal" to refer to a school of thought originally referred to as [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_liberalism social liberalism]] that branched off of [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_liberalism classical liberalism]] during the Great Depression, which was eventually shortened to just "liberalism", whereas the LDP follows [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_conservatism liberal conservatism]], which, as you can probably tell by the name, was shortened to just "conservatism" in the US[[/note]]. Comparable to the British Tories and American Republicans. Places an emphasis on free market (neoliberal) capitalism and traditional social mores. Most prime ministers after UsefulNotes/WorldWarTwo came from the LDP - it led the country from its foundation in 1955 (through the merger of the Liberal and Japan Democratic parties), until it lost its first election in ''1993'' (but ended up back in power in 1994 after the opposition coalition collapsed, forming a coalition government with their ArchNemesis the Socialists). For this reason, some people call Japan a "One-and-a-half Party State". The LDP lost by a spectacular landslide in 2009, but returned by another spectacular landslide in 2012.



** Social Democratic Party: The LDP's chief rivals up until the the mid-'90s, though they've dwindled since then. Moderately socialist, similar to Britain's pre-Blair Labour Party.

to:

** Social Democratic Party: The LDP's chief rivals up until the the mid-'90s, though they've dwindled since then. Moderately socialist, Advocates for social democratic policies, similar to Britain's pre-Blair Labour Party.
30th Oct '15 11:50:24 AM Josef5678
Is there an issue? Send a Message


The causes are widely debated - independent women not wanting the burden of a family, Japanese men [[{{Salaryman}} being overworked and not very attractive mates]], social pressures to not have many children, some combination thereof, something else, [[note]]''TheEconomist'' posits that it could be moral conservatism: married Japanese women tend to have about as many children as European ones, but the Japanese still see marriage--which has all manner of conditions in Japanese society--as a necessary step for having children, while Europeans don't. As a result, fewer Japanese women end up marrying, and so fewer have children[[/note]] there's no obvious answer. But the result is clear: deaths outnumber births, and even with a larger overall population compared to several decades ago, there are fewer and fewer children in Japan. The current median age of the Japanese population is *45*.

to:

The causes are widely debated - independent women not wanting the burden of a family, Japanese men [[{{Salaryman}} being overworked and not very attractive mates]], social pressures to not have many children, some combination thereof, something else, [[note]]''TheEconomist'' [[note]]''Magazine/TheEconomist'' posits that it could be moral conservatism: married Japanese women tend to have about as many children as European ones, but the Japanese still see marriage--which has all manner of conditions in Japanese society--as a necessary step for having children, while Europeans don't. As a result, fewer Japanese women end up marrying, and so fewer have children[[/note]] there's no obvious answer. But the result is clear: deaths outnumber births, and even with a larger overall population compared to several decades ago, there are fewer and fewer children in Japan. The current median age of the Japanese population is *45*.
6th Sep '15 6:57:19 PM nombretomado
Is there an issue? Send a Message


Back in TheEighties, Japan's economy [[JapanTakesOverTheWorld was the most dynamic in the world]]. Companies were making money, high-quality Japanese products flooded the world (and humiliated [[UsefulNotes/{{Detroit}} the Big Three]]), Japanese investors were buying up gigantic swaths of real estate in Japan and pretty much everywhere else. It was a great time for Japan; their influence was booming; every high-flying business student took Japanese (the stereotype of Japanese as the language of choice for [[OccidentalOtaku adolescent Japanophiles]] didn't come until ''much'' later); the JapaneseTourist became a StockCharacter; and dystopias (''Film/BladeRunner'' and ''{{Neuromancer}}'' are classic examples) typically presented a thoroughly Japonized future. There was serious talk about breaking away from the US and the West and Japan leading the world anew. The entire world was open for Japan. And then...

to:

Back in TheEighties, Japan's economy [[JapanTakesOverTheWorld was the most dynamic in the world]]. Companies were making money, high-quality Japanese products flooded the world (and humiliated [[UsefulNotes/{{Detroit}} the Big Three]]), Japanese investors were buying up gigantic swaths of real estate in Japan and pretty much everywhere else. It was a great time for Japan; their influence was booming; every high-flying business student took Japanese (the stereotype of Japanese as the language of choice for [[OccidentalOtaku adolescent Japanophiles]] didn't come until ''much'' later); the JapaneseTourist became a StockCharacter; and dystopias (''Film/BladeRunner'' and ''{{Neuromancer}}'' ''Literature/{{Neuromancer}}'' are classic examples) typically presented a thoroughly Japonized future. There was serious talk about breaking away from the US and the West and Japan leading the world anew. The entire world was open for Japan. And then...
15th Jul '15 1:38:24 PM Sedirex
Is there an issue? Send a Message


The current prime minister is Shinzo Abe of the LDP.

to:

The current prime minister is Shinzo Abe Abe[[note]]pronounced "Ah-Beh," not like the Western name that's short for Abraham[[/note]] of the LDP.
30th Jun '15 9:19:56 AM nombretomado
Is there an issue? Send a Message


!!!''[[Series/BattlestarGalacticaReimagined If we are going to survive as a nation, we need to start making babies!]]''

to:

!!!''[[Series/BattlestarGalacticaReimagined !!!''[[Series/BattlestarGalactica2003 If we are going to survive as a nation, we need to start making babies!]]''
12th May '15 9:48:04 AM ShinyTsukkomi
Is there an issue? Send a Message


Relevant to TVTropes, this answers a question or two a reader may have had - "Hey, why do so many entertainment companies in Japan these days focus so much on "kiddie" entertainment that works for adults, too? Or why is so much anime made for {{otaku}} in the style of the cartoons they used to like, when a fair amount of anime ''was'' made for kids back then?" Well, the answer is simple: ''there are practically more otaku than kids nowadays''. Anime has taken [[{{Moe}} different]] [[{{Lolicon}} bents]] in the past decade or so because the kids who grew up have a lot more buying power, and because ''the number of new kids to sell products to has been going down constantly''. Many companies are abandoning children's programming altogether or "diversifying" their products (see: Nintendo's "for everyone" approach with the [[UsefulNotes/NintendoDS DS]] and [[UsefulNotes/NintendoWii Wii]]) simply because the money isn't there in the kid market anymore, and it doesn't look like it will be there any time soon. This isn't to say that ''everyone'' has abandoned the market - ShonenJump and whatnot still exist, after all - but the kids market is getting ever-smaller and the entertainment products of Japan have been changing to reflect that. (And even SJ, for example, has seen a readership decline over the past two decades simply due to, well, a lack of available shonen.)

to:

Relevant to TVTropes, this answers a question or two a reader may have had - "Hey, why do so many entertainment companies in Japan these days focus so much on "kiddie" entertainment that works for adults, too? Or why is so much anime made for {{otaku}} in the style of the cartoons they used to like, when a fair amount of anime ''was'' made for kids back then?" Well, the answer is simple: ''there are practically more otaku than kids nowadays''. Anime has taken [[{{Moe}} different]] [[{{Lolicon}} bents]] in the past decade or so because the kids who grew up have a lot more buying power, and because ''the number of new kids to sell products to has been going down constantly''. Many companies are abandoning children's programming altogether or "diversifying" their products (see: Nintendo's "for everyone" approach with the [[UsefulNotes/NintendoDS DS]] and [[UsefulNotes/NintendoWii Wii]]) simply because the money isn't there in the kid market anymore, and it doesn't look like it will be there any time soon. This isn't to say that ''everyone'' has abandoned the market - ShonenJump ''Magazine/ShonenJump'' and whatnot still exist, after all - but the kids market is getting ever-smaller and the entertainment products of Japan have been changing to reflect that. (And even SJ, for example, has seen a readership decline over the past two decades simply due to, well, a lack of available shonen.)
13th Apr '15 12:00:45 PM gemmabeta2
Is there an issue? Send a Message


Funnily enough, the majority of Japanese emperors in history ended their rule not with their death, but by resigning. However this was not for any scandalous reason. Pre-Meiji Japanese emperors were required to perform such tedious and repetitive rituals, and so many of them, that even the Japanese thought a human being shouldn't be forced to do them for long. Therefore most emperors reigned only 10 or so years before retiring in comfort, leaving the throne for their brother or son.

to:

Funnily enough, the majority of Japanese emperors in history ended their rule not with their death, but by resigning. However this was not for any scandalous reason. Pre-Meiji Japanese emperors were required to perform such tedious and repetitive rituals, and so many of them, that even the Japanese thought a human being shouldn't be forced to do them for long. Therefore most emperors reigned only 10 or so years before retiring in comfort, leaving the throne for their brother or son. This short duration of office meant that most of these emperors would be crowned while still very young, a few as young as 6-years-old. It was said that only a youth can withstand the endless tedium of the rituals (not to mention the fact that these boy-emperors would also be very pliable to the Shoguns). Most emperors would have abdicated and retired to a life of pleasure (or ruling from behind the scenes) by the time they hit adulthood.
This list shows the last 10 events of 31. Show all.
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/article_history.php?article=UsefulNotes.JapanesePoliticalSystem