Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* CreatorBacklash: At least two cast members have spoken out against the film. Creator/KelseyGrammer didn't think the DenserAndWackier humor typical of David Zucker's work was a good fit for a film trying to deliver a serious political message, and felt it went a little too far in demonizing liberals. Creator/JonVoight, on the other hand, felt it didn't go ''far enough'' in demonizing them.
to:
* CreatorBacklash: At least two cast members have spoken out against the film. Creator/KelseyGrammer didn't think the DenserAndWackier humor typical of David Zucker's work was a good fit for a film trying to deliver a serious political message, and felt it went a little too far in demonizing liberals.liberals[[note]]And Kelsey is a Republican[[/note]]. Creator/JonVoight, on the other hand, felt it didn't go ''far enough'' in demonizing them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
** Kevin Farley hasn't had many leading film roles since this one apart from a ''Film/ParanormalActivity'' spoof he directed. He has since mostly taken supporting roles in obscure films and recurring roles in television shows.
to:
** Kevin Farley Creator/KevinFarley hasn't had many leading film roles since this one apart from a ''Film/ParanormalActivity'' spoof he directed. He has since mostly taken supporting roles in obscure films and recurring roles in television shows.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** In the UK and other markets it was called ''Big Fat Important Movie''.
Added DiffLines:
* DirectToDVD: Just about everywhere outside the US.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* BoxOfficeBomb: Made back just over $7 million versus its $20 million budget. [[Creator/ZuckerAbrahamsAndZucker David Zucker]] afterwards claimed that he was done making conservative-driven spoof films as a result. Regardless, his career suffered from the film's failure and has not directed a film since then.
to:
* BoxOfficeBomb: Made back just over $7 million versus its $20 million budget. [[Creator/ZuckerAbrahamsAndZucker David Zucker]] afterwards claimed that he was done making conservative-driven spoof films as a result. Regardless, his career suffered from the film's failure failure, and he has not directed a film since then.
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
** Kevin Farley hasn't had many leading film roles since this one apart from a Film/ParanormalActivity spoof he directed. He has since mostly taken supporting roles in obscure films and recurring roles in television shows.
to:
** Kevin Farley hasn't had many leading film roles since this one apart from a Film/ParanormalActivity ''Film/ParanormalActivity'' spoof he directed. He has since mostly taken supporting roles in obscure films and recurring roles in television shows.
Changed line(s) 9 (click to see context) from:
* TroubledProduction: Per the DVDCommentary, the movie was heavily reshot after test audiences [[{{Irony}} (in conservative Texas)]] proved more confused than amused by the original cut (Zucker felt many viewers didn't understand it was a comedy), while the film's conservative bankrollers objected to some of its crude humor. Additionally, Zucker and the filmmakers found their cast (mostly political conservatives themselves) uncooperative and often domineering. Particular offenders were Creator/KelseyGrammer, who objected to a scene where his [[UsefulNotes/GeorgeSPatton General Patton]] shoots a horde of ACLU lawyers,[[note]]The scene was rewritten at Grammer's request so that it seemed less like he was murdering liberals for their political beliefs, with all the UnfortunateImplications that carries[[/note]] and Creator/JonVoight, who [[WagTheDirector demanded to write his own]] UsefulNotes/GeorgeWashington monologue and complained that Zucker and Kevin Farley made Michael Malone too sympathetic.
to:
* TroubledProduction: Per the DVDCommentary, the movie was heavily reshot after test audiences [[{{Irony}} (in ([[{{Irony}} in conservative Texas)]] Texas]]) proved more confused than amused by the original cut (Zucker felt many viewers didn't understand it was a comedy), while the film's conservative bankrollers objected to some of its crude humor. Additionally, Zucker and the filmmakers found their cast (mostly political conservatives themselves) uncooperative and often domineering. Particular offenders were Creator/KelseyGrammer, who objected to a scene where his [[UsefulNotes/GeorgeSPatton General Patton]] shoots a horde of ACLU lawyers,[[note]]The scene was rewritten at Grammer's request so that it seemed less like he was murdering liberals for their political beliefs, with all the UnfortunateImplications that carries[[/note]] and Creator/JonVoight, who [[WagTheDirector demanded to write his own]] UsefulNotes/GeorgeWashington monologue and complained that Zucker and Kevin Farley made Michael Malone too sympathetic.sympathetic.
----
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not a trivia
Deleted line(s) 7 (click to see context) :
* CrossesTheLineTwice: The entire film in a nutshell.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* BoxOfficeBomb: Made back just over $7 million versus its $20 million budget. David Zucker afterwards claimed that he was done making conservative-driven spoof films as a result. Regardless, his career suffered from the film's failure and has not directed a film since then.
to:
* BoxOfficeBomb: Made back just over $7 million versus its $20 million budget. [[Creator/ZuckerAbrahamsAndZucker David Zucker Zucker]] afterwards claimed that he was done making conservative-driven spoof films as a result. Regardless, his career suffered from the film's failure and has not directed a film since then.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* BoxOfficeBomb: Made back just over $7 million versus its $20 million budget. David Zucker afterwards claimed that he was done making conservative-driven spoof films as a result. Regardless, his career suffered from the film's failure.
to:
* BoxOfficeBomb: Made back just over $7 million versus its $20 million budget. David Zucker afterwards claimed that he was done making conservative-driven spoof films as a result. Regardless, his career suffered from the film's failure.failure and has not directed a film since then.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:
* TroubledProduction: Per the DVDCommentary, the movie was heavily reshot after test audiences [[{{Irony}} (in conservative Texas)]] proved more confused than amused by the original cut (Zucker felt many viewers didn't understand it was a comedy), while the film's conservative bankrollers objected to some of its crude humor. Additionally, Zucker and the filmmakers found their cast (mostly political conservatives themselves) uncooperative and often domineering. Particular offenders were Creator/KelseyGrammer, who objected to a scene where his [[UsefulNotes/GeorgeSPatton General Patton]] shoots a horde of ACLU lawyers, and Creator/JonVoight, who [[WagTheDirector demanded to write his own]] UsefulNotes/GeorgeWashington monologue and complained that Zucker and Kevin Farley made Michael Malone too sympathetic.
to:
* TroubledProduction: Per the DVDCommentary, the movie was heavily reshot after test audiences [[{{Irony}} (in conservative Texas)]] proved more confused than amused by the original cut (Zucker felt many viewers didn't understand it was a comedy), while the film's conservative bankrollers objected to some of its crude humor. Additionally, Zucker and the filmmakers found their cast (mostly political conservatives themselves) uncooperative and often domineering. Particular offenders were Creator/KelseyGrammer, who objected to a scene where his [[UsefulNotes/GeorgeSPatton General Patton]] shoots a horde of ACLU lawyers, lawyers,[[note]]The scene was rewritten at Grammer's request so that it seemed less like he was murdering liberals for their political beliefs, with all the UnfortunateImplications that carries[[/note]] and Creator/JonVoight, who [[WagTheDirector demanded to write his own]] UsefulNotes/GeorgeWashington monologue and complained that Zucker and Kevin Farley made Michael Malone too sympathetic.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* CreatorBacklash: At least two cast members have spoken out against the film. Creator/KelseyGrammer didn't think the DenserAndWackier humor typical of David Zucker's work was a good fit for a film trying to deliver a serious political message, and felt it went a little too far in demonizing liberals. Creator/JonVoight, on the other hand, felt it didn't go ''far enough'' in demonizing them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* CreatorKiller: Likewise, this put Zucker's directing career in Limbo; he has not directed another film and didn't even get another credit until ''Film/ScaryMovie 5''.
to:
* CreatorKiller: Likewise, this CreatorKiller:
** The film put Zucker's directing career inLimbo; he limbo. He has not directed another film and didn't even get another credit until ''Film/ScaryMovie 5''.
** The film put Zucker's directing career in
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
** Kevin Farley hasn't had many leading film roles since this one apart from a Film/ParanormalActivity spoof he directed. He has since mostly taken supporting roles in obscure films and recurring roles in Television shows.
to:
** Kevin Farley hasn't had many leading film roles since this one apart from a Film/ParanormalActivity spoof he directed. He has since mostly taken supporting roles in obscure films and recurring roles in Television shows. television shows.
* CrossesTheLineTwice: The entire film in a nutshell.
* CrossesTheLineTwice: The entire film in a nutshell.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* CompletelyDifferentTitle: The Brazilian version of the filme received the titel ''Corra que Tem Loucos por Aí!'' (Run, There are Crazy People Out There!).
to:
* CompletelyDifferentTitle: The Brazilian version of the filme film received the titel title ''Corra que Tem Loucos por Aí!'' (Run, There are Crazy People Out There!).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* CompletelyDifferentTitle: The Brazilian version of the filme received the titel ''Corra que Tem Loucos por Aí!'' (Run, There are Crazy People Out There!).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Zero Context
Deleted line(s) 1 (click to see context) :
* BillingDisplacement
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
**Kevin Farley hasn't had many leading film roles since this one apart from a Film/ParanormalActivity spoof he directed. He has since mostly taken supporting roles in obscure films and recurring roles in Television shows.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2,5 (click to see context) from:
* BoxOfficeBomb: Didn't even make back half of its $20 million budget. David Zucker afterwards claimed that he was done making conservative driven spoof films as a result. Regardless, his career suffered from the film's failure.
* CreatorKiller: This put Zucker's directing career in Limbo; he has not directed another film and didn't even get another credit until ''Scary Movie'' No. 5.
* NotScreenedForCritics: David Zucker feared that the film's highly conservative bent would turn critics against it. For better or for worse, [[SelfFulfillingProphecy he turned out to be right]].
* TroubledProduction: Per the commentary track, the movie was heavily reshot after test audiences proved more confused than amused by the original cut (Zucker felt many viewers didn't understand it was a comedy), while the film's conservative bankrollers objected to some of its crude humor. Additionally, Zucker and the filmmakers found their cast (mostly conservatives themselves) uncooperative and often domineering. Particular offenders were Creator/KelseyGrammar, who objected to a scene where his General Patton shoots a horde of [=ACLU=] lawyers, and Creator/JonVoight, who demanded to write his own monologue and complained that Zucker and Kevin Farley made Michael Malone too sympathetic.
* CreatorKiller: This put Zucker's directing career in Limbo; he has not directed another film and didn't even get another credit until ''Scary Movie'' No. 5.
* NotScreenedForCritics: David Zucker feared that the film's highly conservative bent would turn critics against it. For better or for worse, [[SelfFulfillingProphecy he turned out to be right]].
* TroubledProduction: Per the commentary track, the movie was heavily reshot after test audiences proved more confused than amused by the original cut (Zucker felt many viewers didn't understand it was a comedy), while the film's conservative bankrollers objected to some of its crude humor. Additionally, Zucker and the filmmakers found their cast (mostly conservatives themselves) uncooperative and often domineering. Particular offenders were Creator/KelseyGrammar, who objected to a scene where his General Patton shoots a horde of [=ACLU=] lawyers, and Creator/JonVoight, who demanded to write his own monologue and complained that Zucker and Kevin Farley made Michael Malone too sympathetic.
to:
* BoxOfficeBomb: Didn't even make Made back half of just over $7 million versus its $20 million budget. David Zucker afterwards claimed that he was done making conservative driven conservative-driven spoof films as a result. Regardless, his career suffered from the film's failure.
failure.
* CreatorKiller:This Likewise, this put Zucker's directing career in Limbo; he has not directed another film and didn't even get another credit until ''Scary Movie'' No. 5.
''Film/ScaryMovie 5''.
* NotScreenedForCritics: David Zucker feared that the film's highly conservative bent would turn critics against it. For better orfor worse, [[SelfFulfillingProphecy he turned out was correct]], though most critics said they simply considered the movie unfunny.
* StillbornFranchise: Zucker apparently wanted tobe right]].
make a sequel just after this, but its failure made that impossible.
* TroubledProduction: Per thecommentary track, DVDCommentary, the movie was heavily reshot after test audiences [[{{Irony}} (in conservative Texas)]] proved more confused than amused by the original cut (Zucker felt many viewers didn't understand it was a comedy), while the film's conservative bankrollers objected to some of its crude humor. Additionally, Zucker and the filmmakers found their cast (mostly political conservatives themselves) uncooperative and often domineering. Particular offenders were Creator/KelseyGrammar, Creator/KelseyGrammer, who objected to a scene where his [[UsefulNotes/GeorgeSPatton General Patton Patton]] shoots a horde of [=ACLU=] ACLU lawyers, and Creator/JonVoight, who [[WagTheDirector demanded to write his own own]] UsefulNotes/GeorgeWashington monologue and complained that Zucker and Kevin Farley made Michael Malone too sympathetic.
* CreatorKiller:
* NotScreenedForCritics: David Zucker feared that the film's highly conservative bent would turn critics against it. For better or
* StillbornFranchise: Zucker apparently wanted to
* TroubledProduction: Per the
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* TroubledProduction: Per the commentary track, the movie was heavily reshot after test audiences proved more confused than amused by the rough drafts (Zucker felt many of them didn't understand it was a comedy), while the film's conservative bankrollers objected to some of its crude humor. Additionally, Zucker and the filmmakers found their cast (mostly conservatives themselves) uncooperative and often domineering. Particular offenders were Creator/KelseyGrammar, who objected to a scene where his General Patton shoots a horde of [=ACLU=] lawyers, and Creator/JonVoight, who demanded to write his own monologue and complained that Zucker and Kevin Farley made Michael Malone too sympathetic.
to:
* TroubledProduction: Per the commentary track, the movie was heavily reshot after test audiences proved more confused than amused by the rough drafts original cut (Zucker felt many of them viewers didn't understand it was a comedy), while the film's conservative bankrollers objected to some of its crude humor. Additionally, Zucker and the filmmakers found their cast (mostly conservatives themselves) uncooperative and often domineering. Particular offenders were Creator/KelseyGrammar, who objected to a scene where his General Patton shoots a horde of [=ACLU=] lawyers, and Creator/JonVoight, who demanded to write his own monologue and complained that Zucker and Kevin Farley made Michael Malone too sympathetic.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* NotScreenedForCritics: David Zucker feared that the film's highly conservative bent would turn critics against it. For better or for worse, [[SelfFulfillingProphecy he turned out to be right]].
to:
* NotScreenedForCritics: David Zucker feared that the film's highly conservative bent would turn critics against it. For better or for worse, [[SelfFulfillingProphecy he turned out to be right]].right]].
* TroubledProduction: Per the commentary track, the movie was heavily reshot after test audiences proved more confused than amused by the rough drafts (Zucker felt many of them didn't understand it was a comedy), while the film's conservative bankrollers objected to some of its crude humor. Additionally, Zucker and the filmmakers found their cast (mostly conservatives themselves) uncooperative and often domineering. Particular offenders were Creator/KelseyGrammar, who objected to a scene where his General Patton shoots a horde of [=ACLU=] lawyers, and Creator/JonVoight, who demanded to write his own monologue and complained that Zucker and Kevin Farley made Michael Malone too sympathetic.
* TroubledProduction: Per the commentary track, the movie was heavily reshot after test audiences proved more confused than amused by the rough drafts (Zucker felt many of them didn't understand it was a comedy), while the film's conservative bankrollers objected to some of its crude humor. Additionally, Zucker and the filmmakers found their cast (mostly conservatives themselves) uncooperative and often domineering. Particular offenders were Creator/KelseyGrammar, who objected to a scene where his General Patton shoots a horde of [=ACLU=] lawyers, and Creator/JonVoight, who demanded to write his own monologue and complained that Zucker and Kevin Farley made Michael Malone too sympathetic.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* BoxOfficeBomb: Didn't even make back half of its $20 million budget. David Zucker afterwards claimed that he is done making conservative driven spoof films for theaters as a result, he believes they have a stronger presence in the home video market.
to:
* BoxOfficeBomb: Didn't even make back half of its $20 million budget. David Zucker afterwards claimed that he is was done making conservative driven spoof films for theaters as a result, he believes they have a stronger presence in result. Regardless, his career suffered from the home video market.film's failure.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Hey Its That Guy cut by TRS decision.
Deleted line(s) 4,6 (click to see context) :
* HeyItsThatGuy: [[KelseyGrammer Dr. Frasier Crane]] is WWII General George S . Patton!
** Also DennisHopper in one of his last roles, as a judge warding off A.C.L.U. zombies.
** An interesting InUniverse example: Malone's reaction to the short slave who lets him know the bacon stains are cleaned up.
** Also DennisHopper in one of his last roles, as a judge warding off A.C.L.U. zombies.
** An interesting InUniverse example: Malone's reaction to the short slave who lets him know the bacon stains are cleaned up.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* CreatorKiller: This put Zucker's directing career in Limbo; he has not directed another film and didn't even get another credit until ''Scary Movie'' No. 5.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
* NotScreenedForCritics: David Zucker feared that the film's highly conservative bent would turn critics against it. He turned out to be right in hindsight.
to:
* NotScreenedForCritics: David Zucker feared that the film's highly conservative bent would turn critics against it. He For better or for worse, [[SelfFulfillingProphecy he turned out to be right in hindsight.right]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* BoxOfficeBomb: Didn't even make back half of its $20 million budget. David Zucker afterwards claimed that he is done making conservative driven spoof films for theaters as a result, because he believes they have a stronger presence in the home video market.
to:
* BillingDisplacement
* BoxOfficeBomb: Didn't even make back half of its $20 million budget. David Zucker afterwards claimed that he is done making conservative driven spoof films for theaters as a result,because he believes they have a stronger presence in the home video market.
* BoxOfficeBomb: Didn't even make back half of its $20 million budget. David Zucker afterwards claimed that he is done making conservative driven spoof films for theaters as a result,
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* NotScreenedForCritics: David Zucker feared that the film's highly conservative bent would turn critics against it. For one reason or another, he turned out to be right in hindsight.
to:
* NotScreenedForCritics: David Zucker feared that the film's highly conservative bent would turn critics against it. For one reason or another, he He turned out to be right in hindsight.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* HeyItsThatGuy: [[KelseyGrammer Dr. Frasier Crane]] is WWII General George S. Patton!
to:
* BoxOfficeBomb: Didn't even make back half of its $20 million budget. David Zucker afterwards claimed that he is done making conservative driven spoof films for theaters as a result, because he believes they have a stronger presence in the home video market.
* HeyItsThatGuy: [[KelseyGrammer Dr. Frasier Crane]] is WWII General GeorgeS.S . Patton!
* HeyItsThatGuy: [[KelseyGrammer Dr. Frasier Crane]] is WWII General George
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* NotScreenedForCritics: David Zucker feared that the film's highly conservative bent would turn critics against it.
to:
* NotScreenedForCritics: David Zucker feared that the film's highly conservative bent would turn critics against it. For one reason or another, he turned out to be right in hindsight.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
moved tropes from main to trivia.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* HeyItsThatGuy: [[KelseyGrammer Dr. Frasier Crane]] is WWII General George S. Patton!
** Also DennisHopper in one of his last roles, as a judge warding off A.C.L.U. zombies.
** An interesting InUniverse example: Malone's reaction to the short slave who lets him know the bacon stains are cleaned up.
* NotScreenedForCritics: David Zucker feared that the film's highly conservative bent would turn critics against it.
** Also DennisHopper in one of his last roles, as a judge warding off A.C.L.U. zombies.
** An interesting InUniverse example: Malone's reaction to the short slave who lets him know the bacon stains are cleaned up.
* NotScreenedForCritics: David Zucker feared that the film's highly conservative bent would turn critics against it.