* [[ArtisticLicensePhysics You Fail Physics Forever]] - Along with most other scientific disciplines, from the second season on. One episode involves time being undone because at some point in the future, humanity no longer exists.
** If that was implied in the one episode where the only two humans left alive were [[spoiler:playing video games and doing nothing else at all]], then yes, that fails physics forever. If it's the one where they still existed despite their entire histories being erased via [[spoiler:a previously non-existent WorldWarIII resulting from the CubanMissileCrisis]]...then not so much.
*** It was the former. The end of (human) history is treated as synonymous with the end of ''time'', and because time is a "Moebius strip" where "the past cannot exist without the future," the twenty-first century "doesn't exist anymore" for the crew to return to. Until, that is, they "ensure a future" by persuading the last two people alive to hook up. The logic is actually quite elegant, if you're stoned as balls.
---->'''Piccolo:''' I made 'em a picnic basket. You know how it is: a boy, a girl, a picnic basket, a blanket...
---->'''Bridger:''' Now if Lucas is right, we've ensured a future here. And we ought to have brought back the past.
**** Um, flag on the play here, as FridgeLogic specifically points out that humanity is still dead (or as TheOtherWiki would say, ''extinct in the wild''). So what if they got them to hook up and start churning out kids? Who are those kids going to hook up with and make babies - [[{{Squick}} each other]], or with Mom and Dad as well? As with most things on DSV, this was an [[AssPull incomplete pass in the game of logic]].

6th Apr '13 12:16:24 AM Rabukurafuto

Send Rabukurafuto a PM notification explaining the badness of natter: natter-fy

Changed line(s) 38 (click to see context) from:

to:

6th Apr '13 12:15:04 AM Rabukurafuto

Send Rabukurafuto a PM notification explaining the badness of natter: natter-fy

Deleted line(s) 27,28 (click to see context) :

1st Mar '13 11:55:57 AM MarkLungo

Send MarkLungo a PM notification explaining the badness of natter: natter-fy

Changed line(s) 13,14 (click to see context) from:

to:

1st Mar '13 11:54:29 AM MarkLungo