Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Series / BecomingElizabeth

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** John Dudley successfully manages to replace Edward as Lord Protector.

to:

** John Dudley successfully manages to replace Edward as Lord Protector.Protector, and then later has him restored to the council only to have him arrested and executed.



** [[spoiler: Edward Seymour was not, in fact, as skilled an administrator as the show portrays nor was his downfall caused by his willingness to back Mary as the rightful heir. He was a good and honorable solider, but he was considered a rather incompetent administrator.]]

to:

** [[spoiler: Edward Seymour was not, in fact, as skilled an administrator as the show portrays nor was his downfall caused by his willingness to back Mary as the rightful heir. He did alienate John Dudley by wanting Mary to have religious freedom, but he wasn't in a political alliance with her. He was a good and honorable solider, and popular among the common people, but he was considered a rather incompetent administrator.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** [[spoiler: Edward Seymour was not, in fact, as skilled an administrator as the show portrays nor was his downfall caused by his silliness to back Mary as the rightful heir. He was a good and honorable solider, but he was considered a rather incompetent administrator.]]

to:

** [[spoiler: Edward Seymour was not, in fact, as skilled an administrator as the show portrays nor was his downfall caused by his silliness willingness to back Mary as the rightful heir. He was a good and honorable solider, but he was considered a rather incompetent administrator.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** [spoiler: Edward Seymour was not, in fact, as skilled an administrator as the show portrays nor was his downfall caused by his silliness to back Mary as the rightful heir. He was a good and honorable solider, but he was considered a rather incompetent administrator.]]

to:

** [spoiler: [[spoiler: Edward Seymour was not, in fact, as skilled an administrator as the show portrays nor was his downfall caused by his silliness to back Mary as the rightful heir. He was a good and honorable solider, but he was considered a rather incompetent administrator.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* HistoricalHeroUpgrade:
** [spoiler: Edward Seymour was not, in fact, as skilled an administrator as the show portrays nor was his downfall caused by his silliness to back Mary as the rightful heir. He was a good and honorable solider, but he was considered a rather incompetent administrator.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Robert Dudley and Amy Robsart did no marry in secret but rather had a lavish wedding, with Elizabeth and many other courtiers in attendance.

to:

** Robert Dudley and Amy Robsart did no not marry in secret but rather had a lavish wedding, with Elizabeth and many other courtiers in attendance.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* {{Cliffhanger}}: [[spoiler: The first series ends with Edward VI ill and John Dudley summoning Jane Grey, while Elizabeth and Mary have an intense conversation that leads to a truce between the sisters]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Robert Dudley and Amy Robsart did no marry in secret but rather had a lavish wedding, with Elizabeth and many other courtiers in attendance.
* It is highly unlikely that John Dudley first approached Elizabeth to help him thwart Mary's ascension to the throne.

to:

* ** Robert Dudley and Amy Robsart did no marry in secret but rather had a lavish wedding, with Elizabeth and many other courtiers in attendance.
* ** It is highly unlikely that John Dudley first approached Elizabeth to help him thwart Mary's ascension to the throne.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Robert Dudley and Amy Robsart did no marry in secret but rather had a lavish wedding, with Elizabeth and many other courtiers in attendance.
* It is highly unlikely that John Dudley first approached Elizabeth to help him thwart Mary's ascension to the throne.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* GorgeousPeriodDress: The costumes in the show are not only sumptuous, as befitting royalty, they are far more historically accurate that is normal for soapy melodrama style historic television.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** No Catholics were burned under the reign of Edward VI, but rather two extreme protestants. One was a woman who denied Christ was human, the other a man who denied Christ was divine. Both were burned under the orders of Thomas Cranmer, and Edward VI was actually uncomfortable with the idea.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AssInAmbassador: The Spanish Ambassador seems to look down on everybody, and he very nearly convinces Princess Mary to flee to England, which would have been tantamount to renouncing her claim to the throne.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheGloriousWarOfSisterlyRivalry: Princess Mary (Smart) and Princess Elizabeth (Beautiful) are a complex version of this trope. Mary is older, an OldMaid, HolierThanThou but far wiser than her kid sister. Elizabeth, on the other hand, is beautiful, passionate and a budding AlphaBitch but she's also being groomed by her stepfather, much to Mary's horror. True to the historic record, Elizabeth is an excellent student and both sisters have been given a historical beauty upgrade, but they still fit this trope to a T. The audience knows that eventually, Elizabeth will become a far greater queen than her sister, and even Mary admits Elizabeth is cleverer than she is, but she also points out how naive the young woman is.

to:

* TheGloriousWarOfSisterlyRivalry: Princess Mary (Smart) and Princess Elizabeth (Beautiful) are a complex version of this trope. Mary is older, an OldMaid, HolierThanThou but far wiser than her kid sister. Elizabeth, on the other hand, is beautiful, passionate and a budding AlphaBitch but she's also being groomed by her stepfather, much to Mary's horror. True to the historic record, Elizabeth is an excellent student and both sisters have been given a historical beauty upgrade, but they still squarely fit into this trope to a T.trope. The audience knows that eventually, Elizabeth will become a far greater queen than her sister, and even Mary admits Elizabeth is cleverer than she is, but she also points out how naive the young woman is.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheGloriousWarOfSisterlyRivalry: Princess Mary (Smart) and Princess Elizabeth (Beautiful) are a complex version of this trope. Mary is older, an OldMaid, HolierThanThou but far wiser than her kid sister. Elizabeth, on the other hand, is beautiful, passionate and a budding Alpha Bitch but she's also being groomed by her stepfather, much to Mary's horror. True to the historic record, Elizabeth is an excellent student and both sisters have been given a historical beauty upgrade, but they still fit this trope to a T. The audience knows that eventually, Elizabeth will become a far greater queen than her sister, and even Mary admits Elizabeth is cleverer than she is, but she also points out how naive the young woman is.

to:

* TheGloriousWarOfSisterlyRivalry: Princess Mary (Smart) and Princess Elizabeth (Beautiful) are a complex version of this trope. Mary is older, an OldMaid, HolierThanThou but far wiser than her kid sister. Elizabeth, on the other hand, is beautiful, passionate and a budding Alpha Bitch AlphaBitch but she's also being groomed by her stepfather, much to Mary's horror. True to the historic record, Elizabeth is an excellent student and both sisters have been given a historical beauty upgrade, but they still fit this trope to a T. The audience knows that eventually, Elizabeth will become a far greater queen than her sister, and even Mary admits Elizabeth is cleverer than she is, but she also points out how naive the young woman is.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* TheGloriousWarOfSisterlyRivalry: Princess Mary (Smart) and Princess Elizabeth (Beautiful) are a complex version of this trope. Mary is older, an OldMaid, HolierThanThou but far wiser than her kid sister. Elizabeth, on the other hand, is beautiful, passionate and a budding Alpha Bitch but she's also being groomed by her stepfather, much to Mary's horror. True to the historic record, Elizabeth is an excellent student and both sisters have been given a historical beauty upgrade, but they still fit this trope to a T. The audience knows that eventually, Elizabeth will become a far greater queen than her sister, and even Mary admits Elizabeth is cleverer than she is, but she also points out how naive the young woman is.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Catherine Parr was certainly naive about her husband's behavior toward Elizabeth, and she had ambitions to remain powerful in court that were thwarted, but she certainly wasn't the clueless manipulator portrayed in the series. Thomas Seymour, on the other hand, was every bit the groomer and predator portrayed.

to:

** Catherine Parr was certainly naive about her husband's behavior toward Elizabeth, and she had ambitions to remain powerful in court that were thwarted, but she certainly wasn't the clueless manipulator portrayed in the series. Thomas Seymour, on the other hand, was every bit the groomer credibly accused of grooming Elizabeth, [[spoiler: even if most historians strongly doubt there was ever a physical affair between Elizabeth and predator portrayed.Seymour.]]



** John Dudley: Dudley was an ambitious courtier and devoted protestant, but he was not responsible for letting Edward burn heretics. In fact, the young king had to be talked into burning heretics by Thomas Cranmer. There is also no evidence he abused his sons. In fact, historians have drawn a sharp contrast between Dudley's home life, in which he was apparently a devoted husband and unusually engaged hands-on parent, with the courtier who attempted a coup that would have put his daughter-in-law on the throne.

to:

** John Dudley: Dudley was an ambitious courtier and devoted protestant, but he was not responsible for letting Edward burn heretics. In fact, the young king had to be talked into burning heretics by Thomas Cranmer. There is also no evidence he abused his sons.sons, and he never had Princess Mary's iconography burned. In fact, historians have drawn a sharp contrast between Dudley's home life, in which he was apparently a devoted husband and unusually engaged hands-on parent, with the courtier who attempted a coup that would have put his daughter-in-law on the throne.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** John Dudley: Dudley was an ambitious courtier and devoted protestant, but he was not responsible for letting Edward burn heretics. In fact, the young king had to be talked into burning heretics by Thomas Cranmer. There is also no evidence he abused his sons. In fact, historians have drawn a sharp contrast between Dudley's home life, in which he was apparently a devoted husband and usually engaged hands-on parent, with the courtier who attempted a coup that would have put his daughter-in-law on the throne.

to:

** John Dudley: Dudley was an ambitious courtier and devoted protestant, but he was not responsible for letting Edward burn heretics. In fact, the young king had to be talked into burning heretics by Thomas Cranmer. There is also no evidence he abused his sons. In fact, historians have drawn a sharp contrast between Dudley's home life, in which he was apparently a devoted husband and usually unusually engaged hands-on parent, with the courtier who attempted a coup that would have put his daughter-in-law on the throne.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* FromBadToWorse: In early episodes, Edward Seymour, Lord Somerset, functions as the villain, a priggish, social climbing contrast to his brother. However, he gradually emerges as the OnlySaneMan, as it becomes clear that he is one of the few members of the council who actually cares about the well being of the country and knows his nephew is too young to rule. When he is usurped by the cold, ambitious John Dudley, things go quickly from bad to worse.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** JohnDudley: Dudley was an ambitious courtier and devoted protestant, but he was not responsible for letting Edward burn heretics. In fact, the young king had to be talked into burning heretics by Thomas Cranmer. There is also no evidence he abused his sons. In fact, historians have drawn a sharp contrast between Dudley's home life, in which he was apparently a devoted husband and usually engaged hands-on parent, with the courtier who attempted a coup that would have put his daughter-in-law on the throne.

to:

** JohnDudley: John Dudley: Dudley was an ambitious courtier and devoted protestant, but he was not responsible for letting Edward burn heretics. In fact, the young king had to be talked into burning heretics by Thomas Cranmer. There is also no evidence he abused his sons. In fact, historians have drawn a sharp contrast between Dudley's home life, in which he was apparently a devoted husband and usually engaged hands-on parent, with the courtier who attempted a coup that would have put his daughter-in-law on the throne.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** JohnDudley: Dudley was an ambitious courtier and devoted protestant, but he was not responsible for letting Edward burn heretics. In fact, the young king had to be talked into burning heretics by Thomas Cranmer. There is also no evidence he abused his sons. In fact, historians have drawn a sharp contrast between Dudley's home life, in which he was apparently a devoted husband and usually engaged hands-on parent, with the courtier who attempted a coup that would have put his daughter-in-law on the throne.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The enmity between Princess Mary and Catherine Parr is exaggerated. The two women had religious differences, and it is true that Mary was upset by Catherine's quick marriage to Thomas Seymour. However, the two remained fond of each other and Catherine named her infant daughter after Princess Mary.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* TheGhost: A few posthumous characters (see below) are mentioned often, including Henry VIII, Jane Seymour and Anne Boleyn, but historians have noticed the absence of several historical characters who should be in the thick of the action. Edward Seymour's wife, Anne, is mentioned a few times in relation to her rivalry with Catherine Parr. On the other hand, Frances Brandon, Jane Grey's mother, is completely absent. Also totally absent from the action in Thomas Cranmer, the man most responsible for radicalizing the young king.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WellIntentionedExtremist: Edward and Mary both, on opposite ends of the religious spectrum. Both are sincere that their religion is the true one and that those opposing them are blasphemers.

to:

* WellIntentionedExtremist: Edward and Mary both, on opposite ends of the religious spectrum. Both are sincere that their religion is the true one and that those opposing them are blasphemers.blasphemers.
* WithFriendsLikeThese
** John Dudley, after usurping Edward Seymour's place as Lord Protector, tells him that it was all for his own good and that he did it out of friendship.
** Knowing he is going to sign his brother's death warrant, Edward tells Thomas he'll take care of his servants and his infant daughter when he is gone.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Princess Mary did not write to the Court of Denmark [[spoiler: alleging that Elizabeth was a bastard]]. She did, however, comment to a courtier years later that Elizabeth looked a lot like Henry Norris, the man Anne Boleyn was accused of having an affair with.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Henry VIII is not only mentioned often, his life and political machinations informs the lives of all the characters.

to:

** Henry VIII is not only mentioned often, his life and political machinations informs inform the lives of all the characters.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* PosthumousCharacter:
** Henry VIII is not only mentioned often, his life and political machinations informs the lives of all the characters.
** Jane Seymour died shortly after giving birth to the young king, and her brothers mention her often, and it is clear they still grieve her loss.
** Anne Boleyn's fate haunts her daughter, who thinks about her mother often and even wears her famous "B" necklace surreptitiously. On top of that, people often mock Elizabeth and question her chastity based on her mother's reputation.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* SlutShaming:
** Even before she's done anything, Elizabeth's virtue is questioned simply based on her long deceased mother's reputation. Things worsen after rumors circulate about Elizabeth and Thomas Seymour, and [[spoiler: with Jane Grey daring to call her a whore to her face.]]
** As dowager queen, Catherine Parr should command respect, but her quick marriage to Thomas Seymour damages her reputation. This leads to a number of people, including Princess Mary, to slut shame Catherine.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** John Dudley punches his son Robert.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* TheCoup:
** Thomas Seymour wants to replace his brother as Lord Protector, though it is unclear if he wishes to control Edward VI or replace him.
** John Dudley successfully manages to replace Edward as Lord Protector.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ParentalSubstitute: They may see her as a pawn, but poor Jane Grey sees Catherine Parr and Thomas Seymour as her substitute parents. Thomas even gets a few scenes with her where he is, in contrast to his scenes with Elizabeth, fatherly and affectionate, showing that he has grown to like the doomed, abused girl.

to:

* ParentalSubstitute: They may see her as a pawn, but poor Jane Grey sees Catherine Parr and Thomas Seymour as her substitute parents. Thomas even gets a few scenes with her where he is, in contrast to his scenes with Elizabeth, fatherly and ''appropriately'' affectionate, showing that he has grown to like the doomed, abused girl.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ParentalSubstitute: They may see her as a pawn, but poor Jane Grey sees Catherine Parr and Thomas Seymour as her substitute parents. Thomas even gets a few scenes with her where he is, in contrast to his scenes with Elizabeth, fatherly and affectionate, showing that he has grown to like the doomed, abused girl.

Top