Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Recap / TheAdventuresOfBatmanAndRobinE3Trial

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
General clarification on work content


-->'''Mad Hatter:''' I'd like that last remark stricken from the record, please.\\

to:

-->'''Mad Hatter:''' I'd like that last remark statement stricken from the record, please.\\
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
General clarification on work content


-->'''Mad Hatter:''' Your Honor, I would like that last remark stricken from the record.\\

to:

-->'''Mad Hatter:''' Your Honor, I would I'd like that last remark stricken from the record.record, please.\\
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* NiceJobFixingItVillain: The various Arkham inmates break out and capture Batman and Van Dorn, who herself is against the Dark Knight's vigilantism. The villains then place Batman on trial (with Joker as judge, Two-Face as prosecutor, Ventriloquist and Scarface as bailiff, and the rest as both the jury and the witnesses), [[BlatantLies "promising"]] to let them both go if Van Dorn proves Batman was not responsible [[CreateYourOwnVillain for creating them]], as she herself claimed. She's not only able to prove that they were responsible for their own actions -- and in fact [[CreateYourOwnHero they created him]] -- but it gets rid of a major obstacle in Batman's crusade by having a prominent political figure stirring up public opinion against him, or worse yet, having him prosecuted for his activities. If anything, they proved to her exactly why Batman is needed -- though she still admits (and the Dark Knight agrees) that they're both working towards a time where he's not required.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Scarface objects to Joker [[FriendOrFoe almost hitting Killer Croc with his gun]].

to:

** When Joker takes Scarface's gun to attack Batman, Scarface objects to Joker the use of it since [[FriendOrFoe almost hitting Killer Croc with is in firing range.]] Joker, for his gun]]. part, doesn't care until he almost hits Harley.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* MaleGaze: When van Dorn is called away from dinner with Bruce, she promises she'll only be a moment. As she walks off, Bruce leans over, with the camera cutting to her backside.
-->'''Bruce:''' Take your time.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* FairPlayVillain: To a point. The inmates of Arkham, faced with van Dorn's capable defense and arguments, reluctantly admit that, for all that they prefer to blame all their problems on Batman, they messed up their lives all on their own and vote him Not Guilty. Then they try to kill he and van Dorn anyway, not because of the verdict in the farcical parody of a legal process they put together but because, as the court just demonstrated, they're rotten petty people and now they're mad.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* OohMeAccentsSlipping: Parodied. Joker does an atrocious Irish accent as part of his 'Batman's Confessor' gag going into the climax.

to:

* OohMeAccentsSlipping: Parodied. Joker does intentionally adopts an atrocious Irish accent as part of his 'Batman's Confessor' gag going into the climax.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* {{Foreshadowing}}: This is the first time Harley Quinn's [[Recap/TheNewBatmanAdventuresE21MadLove history as a former Arkham psychologist]] is alluded to, as van Dorn briefly brings it up during her examination of Harley on the witness stand.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* OffOnATechnicality: "Trial" demonstrates that Batman's vigilante work can lead to this.

to:

* OffOnATechnicality: "Trial" demonstrates that Batman's vigilante work can lead to this.this, as a judge rules at the beginning of the episode that due to Poison Ivy being captured by him rather than the actual police, she's being remanded to Arkham rather than Stonegate Penitentiary like van Dorn's pushing for.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AwesomenessByAnalysis: Janet van Dorn does this with each of the villains she cross-examines. She's studied their histories and pathologies enough to know ''just'' what buttons to press to get them riled up, and is able to expose al of them as mentally unstable regardless of Batman's presence in their lives.

to:

* AwesomenessByAnalysis: Janet van Dorn does this with each of the villains she cross-examines. She's studied their histories and pathologies enough to know ''just'' what buttons to press to get them riled up, up and is able to expose al all of them as mentally unstable regardless of Batman's presence in their lives.

Added: 1072

Changed: 1299

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AwesomenessByAnalysis: Janet van Dorn does this with each of the villains she cross-examines. She's studied their histories and pathologies enough to know ''just'' what buttons to press to get them riled up, and is able to expose al of them as mentally unstable regardless of Batman's presence in their lives.



* FreudianExcuseIsNoExcuse: In this episode, Gotham's new District Attorney, Janet van Dorn, blames Batman for the city's problems; she believes that Batman created each of the city's villains and wants to put him on trial. The inmates of Arkham kidnap her and Batman and put Batman on trial, accusing him of creating them, and Janet is given the task of defending him. Throughout the trial, she disproves that Batman is to blame for their crimes, finding that the villains would either blame Batman for their problems when it was their own fault, or denied or downplayed their crimes. At the end of the trial, after showing a successful defense, in her closing argument Janet realizes that she was wrong about Batman "creating" the criminals - even without him, [[InSpiteOfANail the Rogues would have most likely turned out the same way]]. While Batman may have inspired some of their costumes and dramatic poses, they made their own choice to become criminals. To her own astonishment, the jury finds Batman not guilty, with the Joker congratulating her.

to:

* FreudianExcuseIsNoExcuse: In this episode, Gotham's new District Attorney, Janet van Dorn, blames Batman for the city's problems; she believes that Batman created each of the city's The villains and wants called to put him on trial. The inmates of Arkham kidnap her and Batman and put Batman on trial, accusing him of creating them, and Janet is given the task of defending him. Throughout the trial, she disproves that Batman is to blame for their crimes, finding that the villains would either witness stand all blame Batman for their turn to criminality, but van Dorn, through her expert legal arguments, proves that each of them was ''already'' mentally unstable before the Dark Knight entered the picture. She also points out that all of the rogues freely chose to do terrible things and are only using Batman as a scapegoat because they don't want to admit that their problems when it was are their own fault, or denied or downplayed their crimes. At fault. Much to van Dorn's shock, the end of the trial, after showing a successful defense, in her closing argument Janet realizes that she was wrong about Batman "creating" the criminals - even without him, [[InSpiteOfANail the Rogues would have most likely turned out the same way]]. While Batman may have inspired some of their costumes works and dramatic poses, they made their own choice she's able to become criminals. To her own astonishment, the jury finds Batman not guilty, with the Joker congratulating her.get a "not guilty" verdict.


Added DiffLines:

* HeroicBystander: Janet van Dorn is an interesting case--after her angry comments about Batman get her swept up in the episode's plot, she takes on the protagonist role, defending Batman in the villains' KangarooCourt and even winning him a verdict of "not guilty." Later, when Batman is about to be unmasked, it's van Dorn who throws a batarang at the lights overhead, plunging the room into darkness and allowing the Caped Crusader to escape. Keep in mind that van Dorn has no superpowers of her own and is in a room full of extremely dangerous people, but she still does the right thing and works her hardest to protect the Dark Knight because it's the right thing to do. Batman himself thanks van Dorn at the episode's end, and they part on friendly terms.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* InSpiteOfANail: Towards the end of the trail, Janet van Dorn concludes that despite her previous beliefs that [[CreateYourOwnVillain Batman's existence created these villains]], Batman's absence wouldn't have changed a thing. If anything, their ''own'' choices would've made them the same villains they are today, with some variation.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* CourtroomAntic: Van Dorn does this with the flower the Joker keeps in his lapel to enrage and discredit Poison Ivy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DatingCatwoman: Considering van Dorn is on a crusade to get rid of Batman, Bruce's date with her could be seen as this. If she had seen him unmasked, their relationship could have gotten awkward.

to:

* DatingCatwoman: Considering van Dorn is on a crusade to get rid dispose of Batman, Bruce's date with her could be seen as this. If she had seen him unmasked, their relationship could have gotten awkward.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* VillainsActHeroesReact: The villains of the series come to the realization that Batman did not [[CreateYourOwnVillain create them]], but they ''they'' created ''him''. If Batman had never existed they would have lost their sanity and turned to crime anyway, but it was only because of crime that Batman himself was born.

to:

* VillainsActHeroesReact: The villains of the series come to the realization that Batman did not [[CreateYourOwnVillain create them]], but they that ''they'' created ''him''. If Batman had never existed existed, they would have lost their sanity and turned to crime anyway, but it was only because of crime that Batman himself was born.

Top