Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Correcting the spelling of Peter S. Fischer's surname.
Changed line(s) 8 (click to see context) from:
Written by: Peter S. Fisher\\
to:
Written by: Peter S. Fisher\\Fischer\\
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* HateSink: Frances Galesko stands out as one of the biggest {{Asshole Victim}}s in the series who isn't a criminal herself. Her very little screentime is spent constantly demeaning Paul, insulting him to no end while expecting him to act as a glorified slave. Notably, when Paul has her tied up and he relates to her how he repeatedly dreams of her being dead, she continues to insult his masculinity and deride him as pathetic. It's only when he takes out a gun that she realizes he's serious, and even then her begging for life takes the form of angrily demanding he untie her. Alvin Deschler being such a NiceGuy was done in large part to stop Paul from being seen as sympathetic on account of how horrible Frances was.
Added DiffLines:
* SympatheticMurderer: Subverted with Paul Galesko. At first he comes off as very sympathetic, with his wife being a complete HateSink who treated him as sub-human and absolutely had it coming. Then comes his second murder, where it's revealed his entire relationship with Alvin Deschler was to kill him set him up as a scapegoat for his wife's murder, and Paul repeatedly slanders Alvin posthumously as part of it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 20,21 (click to see context) from:
It seems to be an open-and-shut case: Deschler's prints on the note, Deschler's prints in the house where Frances was found (Paul tricked Deschler into doing that by supposedly hiring Deschler as a stand-in to buy him the house), Deschler's prints on the gun that killed Frances, the newspaper that was used to make the ransom note in Deschler's hotel room. Unfortunately for Paul, Lt. Columbo is the investigator, and finds a couple of flies in the ointment. A hobo who happened to be sleeping in an abandoned car in the junkyard reports that there was a long pause between the first and second shots. There's a powder burn on Paul's pants, which there shouldn't be if he was in a shootout with Deschler. There's a lack of dust on the clock in the ranch house. And he wonders why a kidnapper like Deschler would be taking cabs everywhere he was going up through just a few days before the murder.
to:
It seems to be an open-and-shut case: OpenAndShutCase: Deschler's prints on the note, Deschler's prints in the house where Frances was found (Paul tricked Deschler into doing that by supposedly hiring Deschler as a stand-in to buy him the house), Deschler's prints on the gun that killed Frances, the newspaper that was used to make the ransom note in Deschler's hotel room. Unfortunately for Paul, Lt. Columbo is the investigator, and finds a couple of flies in the ointment. A hobo who happened to be sleeping in an abandoned car in the junkyard reports that there was a long pause between the first and second shots. There's a powder burn on Paul's pants, which there shouldn't be if he was in a shootout with Deschler. There's a lack of dust on the clock in the ranch house. And he wonders why a kidnapper like Deschler would be taking cabs everywhere he was going up through just a few days before the murder.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 52 (click to see context) from:
* MurderIsTheBestSolution: It's not really clear why Paul takes on all the trouble and risk associated with murdering both his wife and an innocent third party, rather than just divorcing her and running off with his smoking hot and obviously interested secretary Lorna. It ''might'' be because he wants to keep all of Frances' money, but nothing in the dialogue indicates that. Besides, Paul is a well-known photographer who's published several books, so he wouldn't be left starving. In light of those facts, it seems as if he killed his wife purely out of spite.
to:
* MurderIsTheBestSolution: It's not really clear why Paul takes on all the trouble and risk associated with murdering both his wife and an innocent third party, rather than just divorcing her and running off with his smoking hot and obviously interested secretary Lorna. It ''might'' be because he wants to keep all of Frances' money, but nothing in the dialogue indicates that. Besides, Paul is a well-known photographer who's published several books, so he wouldn't be left starving. In light of those facts, it seems as if he killed his wife purely out of spite. He admits to her that he might not get away with murder, but he's beyond caring.
** Through he's not above ripping off his benefactor, which proves a SpannerInTheWorks.
Deleted line(s) 61 (click to see context) :
Added DiffLines:
* SpannerInTheWorks: Paul gets ex-con Deschler to buy a camera for him, that he's later going to use for his wife's supposed kidnapping. Deschler gets the camera store owner to give him a receipt showing a higher price than he paid, so he can skim some money from Paul. This tips off Columbo that Deschler bought the camera on behalf of someone else, not for his own use.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 36 (click to see context) from:
* CutAndPasteNote: Paul makes the standard ransom note with newspaper clippings in order to fake the kidnapping, then uses the cut-up newspapers as part of the frame job by leaving them in Deschler's hotel room.
to:
* CutAndPasteNote: Paul makes the standard ransom note with newspaper clippings in order to fake the kidnapping, then uses the cut-up newspapers as part of the frame job by leaving them in Deschler's hotel room. Colombo realizes the newspapers are plants because Paul only plants the newspapers, not all of the little bits made when taking the clippings.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 12,13 (click to see context) from:
Guest Starring: Creator/DickVanDyke, Creator/DonGordon, Creator/JoannaCameron]
to:
Guest Starring: Creator/DickVanDyke, Creator/DonGordon, Don Gordon, Creator/JoannaCameron]
Changed line(s) 16,17 (click to see context) from:
Paul Galesko (Creator/DickVanDyke) is a professional photographer who is stuck in an unhappy marriage with his controlling, emasculating, shrewish wife Frances (Creator/AntoinetteBower). Paul doesn't want to be married anymore, preferring instead his good-looking and obviously very interested assistant Lorna [=McGrath=] (Creator/JoannaCameron), but he still wants Frances's money. So Paul decides to kill his wife and stage a fake kidnapping as his story. He creates a fake ransom note, then drives his wife to an isolated ranch house, where he ties her up, takes ransom photographs with an off-time clock (to create an alibi), and then shoots her.
to:
Paul Galesko (Creator/DickVanDyke) is a professional photographer who is stuck in an unhappy marriage with his controlling, emasculating, shrewish wife Frances (Creator/AntoinetteBower).(Antoinette Bower). Paul doesn't want to be married anymore, preferring instead his good-looking and obviously very interested assistant Lorna [=McGrath=] (Creator/JoannaCameron), but he still wants Frances's money. So Paul decides to kill his wife and stage a fake kidnapping as his story. He creates a fake ransom note, then drives his wife to an isolated ranch house, where he ties her up, takes ransom photographs with an off-time clock (to create an alibi), and then shoots her.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* FiveFiveFive: Paul Galesko's phone number is 555-6904.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* LegFocus: Lorna is introduced wearing a short skirt and leaning over a desk so that her long legs are well-displayed. Another part of Paul's motive for murder drops into place.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Shes Got Legs is no longer a trope
Deleted line(s) 62 (click to see context) :
* ShesGotLegs: Lorna is introduced wearing a short skirt and leaning over a desk so that her long legs are well-displayed. Another part of Paul's motive for murder drops into place.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* PyrrhicVictory: Having to rely on a BatmanGambit to incriminate Paul, Columbo slumps on the evidence room desk; too tired to put his jacket on right; even apologising to Galesko before the end meaning he wasn't proud he had to cross that line to crack a case.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 34 (click to see context) from:
* CorrectionBait: Columbo plays this game on Paul to toy with his pride as a professional photographer. By mirroring a photo and playing it off as "proof" that the murder took place at a different time (due to the analog clock being mirrored), Paul can't help but reach for the camera he used to show Columbo where the originals are. But how would he know this info unless he took the photos himself?
to:
* CorrectionBait: Columbo plays this game on Paul to toy with his pride as a professional photographer. By mirroring a photo and playing it off as "proof" that the murder took place at a different time (due to the analog clock being mirrored), Paul can't help but reach for the camera he used to show Columbo where the originals are. But how would he know this info which camera to pick unless he took the photos himself?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 48,49 (click to see context) from:
* IdiotBall: Besides frustration with Columbo's (feigned) ignorance about photography and professional pride, it's unclear why exactly Paul decided to blow his cover story and identify the camera he used to take photos at the scene of the crime. Even he is stunned at what he did and how he just demonstrated that he took the pictures of his wife.
** It's implied that Columbo's plan was, by claiming the original was destroyed, and that wasn't sure about flips, the original was NECESSARY to prove Paul's alibi...and Paul would be so angry he'd forget he'd never seen the camera.
** It's implied that Columbo's plan was, by claiming the original was destroyed, and that wasn't sure about flips, the original was NECESSARY to prove Paul's alibi...and Paul would be so angry he'd forget he'd never seen the camera.
to:
* IdiotBall: Besides Due to Paul's frustration with Columbo's (feigned) ignorance about photography and professional pride, it's unclear why exactly Paul decided to blow his cover story and identify the camera he used to take photos at the scene of the crime. Even he is stunned at what he did and how he just demonstrated that he took the pictures of his wife.
** It'simplied that Columbo's plan was, by claiming the original was destroyed, and that wasn't sure about flips, the original was NECESSARY to prove Paul's alibi...and Paul would be so angry he'd forget he'd never seen the camera.camera and contradict his cover story by identifying the camera that he used to photograph his wife. Even he is stunned at what he did and how he just demonstrated that he took the pictures.
** It's
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* CorrectionBait: Columbo plays this game on Paul to toy with his pride as a professional photographer. By mirroring a photo and playing it off as "proof" that the murder took place at a different time (due to the analog clock being mirrored), Paul can't help but reach for the camera he used to show Columbo where the originals are. But how would he know this info unless he took the photos himself?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 31 (click to see context) from:
* BatmanGambit: Columbo pulls off one by slipping something unexpected onto the killer's alibi (The fact the original picture was destroyed) to make him sweat, not unlike he's done the entire episode. This leads to Galesko to impulsively identify the camera.
to:
* BatmanGambit: Columbo pulls off one by slipping something unexpected onto the killer's alibi (The fact the original picture was destroyed) to make him sweat, not unlike he's done the entire episode. This leads to Galesko to impulsively identify the camera.camera to [[CorrectionBait prove Columbo's error.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 59 (click to see context) from:
* SelfDefenseRuse: Paul murdered his wife and made it look like a kidnapping gone bad. He then killed an ex-con and framed him for the kidnapping, claiming the ransom exchange had gone bad and he had to kill the "kidnapper" in self-defense. He even goes as far as shooting himself in the leg just to give his story more credibility, but Columbo immediately notices the powder burn on his pants which contradicts his claim.
to:
* SelfDefenseRuse: Paul murdered his wife and made it look like a kidnapping gone bad. He then killed an ex-con and framed him for the kidnapping, claiming the ransom exchange had gone bad and he had to kill the "kidnapper" in self-defense. He even goes as far as shooting himself in the leg just to give his story more credibility, but Columbo immediately notices the powder burn on his pants which contradicts his claim.indicates otherwise.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 59 (click to see context) from:
* SelfDefenseRuse: Paul murdered his wife and made it look like a kidnapping gone bad. He then killed an ex-con and framed him for the kidnapping, claiming the ransom exchange had gone bad and he had to kill the "kidnapper" in self-defense. He even goes as far as shooting himself in the leg just to give his story more credibility.
to:
* SelfDefenseRuse: Paul murdered his wife and made it look like a kidnapping gone bad. He then killed an ex-con and framed him for the kidnapping, claiming the ransom exchange had gone bad and he had to kill the "kidnapper" in self-defense. He even goes as far as shooting himself in the leg just to give his story more credibility.credibility, but Columbo immediately notices the powder burn on his pants which contradicts his claim.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Using “feels” makes it feel less objective
Changed line(s) 50 (click to see context) from:
* MurderIsTheBestSolution: It's not really clear why Paul takes on all the trouble and risk associated with murdering both his wife and an innocent third party, rather than just divorcing her and running off with his smoking hot and obviously interested secretary Lorna. It ''might'' be because he wants to keep all of Frances' money, but nothing in the dialogue indicates that. Besides, Paul is a well-known photographer who's published several books, so he wouldn't be left starving. In light of those facts, it feels as if killed his wife purely out of spite.
to:
* MurderIsTheBestSolution: It's not really clear why Paul takes on all the trouble and risk associated with murdering both his wife and an innocent third party, rather than just divorcing her and running off with his smoking hot and obviously interested secretary Lorna. It ''might'' be because he wants to keep all of Frances' money, but nothing in the dialogue indicates that. Besides, Paul is a well-known photographer who's published several books, so he wouldn't be left starving. In light of those facts, it feels seems as if he killed his wife purely out of spite.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
No spoilers on a Recap Page.
Changed line(s) 48 (click to see context) from:
** [[spoiler: It's implied that Columbo's plan was, by claiming the original was destroyed, and that wasn't sure about flips, the original was NECESSARY to prove Paul's alibi...and Paul would be so angry he'd forget he'd never seen the camera.]]
to:
** [[spoiler: It's implied that Columbo's plan was, by claiming the original was destroyed, and that wasn't sure about flips, the original was NECESSARY to prove Paul's alibi...and Paul would be so angry he'd forget he'd never seen the camera.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 59 (click to see context) from:
* SelfDefenseRuse: Paul murdered his wife and made it look like a kidnapping gone bad. He then killed an ex-con and framed him for the kidnapping, claiming the ransom exchange had gone bad and he had to kill the "kidnapper" in self-defense.
to:
* SelfDefenseRuse: Paul murdered his wife and made it look like a kidnapping gone bad. He then killed an ex-con and framed him for the kidnapping, claiming the ransom exchange had gone bad and he had to kill the "kidnapper" in self-defense. He even goes as far as shooting himself in the leg just to give his story more credibility.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 22,23 (click to see context) from:
Joyce van Patten, who plays a kind-hearted nun in this episode, played the murderer in Season 6 episode "[[Recap/ColumboS06E02 Old Fashioned Murder]]".
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 32 (click to see context) from:
--> '''Galesko''': [[If I hadn’t taken that camera... You were counting on that! You didn’t accidentally reverse that film... You did that deliberately.]]
to:
--> '''Galesko''': [[If [[LampshadeHanging If I hadn’t taken that camera... You were counting on that! You didn’t accidentally reverse that film... You did that deliberately.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Correcting quote.
Changed line(s) 32 (click to see context) from:
--> '''Galesko''': [[LampshadeHanging If I hadn't picked up that camera...You were counting on that! You didn't reverse that picture by accident, you did it deliberately.]]
to:
--> '''Galesko''': [[LampshadeHanging If [[If I hadn't picked up hadn’t taken that camera...camera... You were counting on that! You didn't didn’t accidentally reverse that picture by accident, you film... You did it that deliberately.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 57,58 (click to see context) from:
--> '''Paul:'''I have this...dream, Frances. I'm working, and, uh, there's a phone call, and he says, "Terribly sorry, Mr. Galesko, but... your wife's dead. Unfortunate accident"... and then I always wake up, and I want to cry. Because you're still alive, Frances, and I have nothing to face that day, but another 24 hours with a domineering, nagging, suffocating woman who took all the joy out of my life.
to:
--> '''Paul:'''I '''Paul:''' I have this...dream, Frances. I'm working, and, uh, there's a phone call, and he says, "Terribly sorry, Mr. Galesko, but... your wife's dead. Unfortunate accident"... and then I always wake up, and I want to cry. Because you're still alive, Frances, and I have nothing to face that day, but another 24 hours with a domineering, nagging, suffocating woman who took all the joy out of my life.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 12,13 (click to see context) from:
Guest Starring: Creator/DickVanDyke, Creator/DonGordon]
to:
Guest Starring: Creator/DickVanDyke, Creator/DonGordon]
Creator/DonGordon, Creator/JoannaCameron]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 57,58 (click to see context) from:
--> '''Paul:'''I have this... dream, Frances. I'm working, and, uh, there's a phone call, and he says, "Terribly sorry, Mr. Galesko, but... your wife's dead. Unfortunate accident"... and then I always wake up, and I want to cry. Because you're still alive, Frances, and I have nothing to face that day, but another 24 hours with a domineering, nagging, suffocating woman who took all the joy out of my life.
to:
--> '''Paul:'''I have this... dream, Frances. I'm working, and, uh, there's a phone call, and he says, "Terribly sorry, Mr. Galesko, but... your wife's dead. Unfortunate accident"... and then I always wake up, and I want to cry. Because you're still alive, Frances, and I have nothing to face that day, but another 24 hours with a domineering, nagging, suffocating woman who took all the joy out of my life.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 57,58 (click to see context) from:
---> '''Paul:'''I have this... dream, Frances. I'm working, and, uh, there's a phone call, and he says, "Terribly sorry, Mr. Galesko, but... your wife's dead. Unfortunate accident"... and then I always wake up, and I want to cry. Because you're still alive, Frances, and I have nothing to face that day, but another 24 hours with a domineering, nagging, suffocating woman who took all the joy out of my life.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* INeverSaidItWasPoison: What ultimately does Paul in. When Columbo states that he lost the original picture he reversed, Paul gets incensed and grabs the camera off the evidence shelf to show Columbo the negative. Of course, it raises the question of how Paul could have known which of the cameras contained the picture, especially since there were at least ten other cameras on that shelf.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* TheReasonYouSuckSpeech: Paul gives Francis one of these as he's getting ready to shoot her:
---> '''Paul:'''I have this... dream, Frances. I'm working, and, uh, there's a phone call, and he says, "Terribly sorry, Mr. Galesko, but... your wife's dead. Unfortunate accident"... and then I always wake up, and I want to cry. Because you're still alive, Frances, and I have nothing to face that day, but another 24 hours with a domineering, nagging, suffocating woman who took all the joy out of my life.
---> '''Paul:'''I have this... dream, Frances. I'm working, and, uh, there's a phone call, and he says, "Terribly sorry, Mr. Galesko, but... your wife's dead. Unfortunate accident"... and then I always wake up, and I want to cry. Because you're still alive, Frances, and I have nothing to face that day, but another 24 hours with a domineering, nagging, suffocating woman who took all the joy out of my life.