Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
The Rational Wiki page has been cut.
Changed line(s) 20,21 (click to see context) from:
-->--'''Wiki/RationalWiki'''
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 28,29 (click to see context) from:
-->-- '''Sunken Scroll 25''' [[note]] dating to at least [[AfterTheEnd 12,000 years before the events of the game]][[/note]], ''VideoGame/{{Splatoon}}''
to:
-->-- '''Sunken Scroll 25''' [[note]] dating [[note]]dating to at least [[AfterTheEnd 12,000 years before the events of the game]][[/note]], ''VideoGame/{{Splatoon}}''
''VideoGame/Splatoon1''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 27 (click to see context) from:
to:
->''"Though academic circles warn of rising sea levels, the policy makers pay them no heed. At this rate, human civilization may be lost beneath the tide."''
-->-- '''Sunken Scroll 25''' [[note]] dating to at least [[AfterTheEnd 12,000 years before the events of the game]][[/note]], ''VideoGame/{{Splatoon}}''
-->-- '''Sunken Scroll 25''' [[note]] dating to at least [[AfterTheEnd 12,000 years before the events of the game]][[/note]], ''VideoGame/{{Splatoon}}''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 22 (click to see context) from:
to:
->Don't you think it's strange, you know\\
The way it all works out\\
Brace yourself for storms and Summer droughts...
-->--'''Music/BritishSeaPower,''' “Canvey Island”
The way it all works out\\
Brace yourself for storms and Summer droughts...
-->--'''Music/BritishSeaPower,''' “Canvey Island”
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 7,18 (click to see context) :
-> I am a skeptic...Global warming has become a new religion.
-->-- '''Nobel Prize winner for Physics, Ivar Giaever'''
-> Runaway greenhouse theories contradict energy balance equations.
-->-- '''Miklós Zágoni, physicist and environmental researcher'''
-> I have spent a long research career studying physics that is closely related to the greenhouse effect...Fears about man-made global warming are unwarranted and are not based on good science....The earth's climate is changing now, as it always has. There is no evidence that the changes differ in any qualitative way from those of the past.
-->-- '''Dr. Will Happer, Princeton physicist'''
-> It is a blatant lie put forth in the media that makes it seem there is only a fringe of scientists who don't buy into anthropogenic global warming.
-->-- '''U.S Government Atmospheric Scientist Stanley B. Goldenberg of the Hurricane Research Division of NOAA'''
-->-- '''Nobel Prize winner for Physics, Ivar Giaever'''
-> Runaway greenhouse theories contradict energy balance equations.
-->-- '''Miklós Zágoni, physicist and environmental researcher'''
-> I have spent a long research career studying physics that is closely related to the greenhouse effect...Fears about man-made global warming are unwarranted and are not based on good science....The earth's climate is changing now, as it always has. There is no evidence that the changes differ in any qualitative way from those of the past.
-->-- '''Dr. Will Happer, Princeton physicist'''
-> It is a blatant lie put forth in the media that makes it seem there is only a fringe of scientists who don't buy into anthropogenic global warming.
-->-- '''U.S Government Atmospheric Scientist Stanley B. Goldenberg of the Hurricane Research Division of NOAA'''
Deleted line(s) 28,30 (click to see context) :
->Now the climate is about to do to us what [[LaserGuidedKarma we have done to Iraq and other oil producers.]]
-->--'''Creator/GoreVidal'''
-->--'''Creator/GoreVidal'''
Deleted line(s) 34,36 (click to see context) :
-> Global warming causing climate change may be the ultimate issue that [[EnemyMine unites us all.]]
-->-- '''Louise Burfitt-Dons'''
-->-- '''Louise Burfitt-Dons'''
Changed line(s) 40,61 (click to see context) from:
->Pack your shit, folks. We’re going away. And we won’t leave much of a trace, either. Maybe a little Styrofoam.
-->--'''Creator/GeorgeCarlin'''
-> The absolutely best case scenario - which in my opinion is unrealistic - with the minimum expected climate change... we end up with an estimate of 9% [of all species] facing extinction.
-->-- '''Chris Thomas, ecologist at the University of Leeds'''
-> Even doubling or tripling the amount of carbon dioxide will virtually have little impact, as water vapour and water condensed on particles as clouds dominate the worldwide scene and always will.
-->-- '''Geoffrey G. Duffy, Chemicals and Materials engineering professor at the University of Auckland, New Zealand'''
-> Unless we stop dumping 70 million tons of global warming pollution into the atmosphere every 24 hours, which we are doing right now ... the continued acceleration of this pollution would destroy the future of human civilization.
-->-- '''Al Gore, former U.S. vice-president and Nobel Peace prize winner'''
-> For how many years must the planet cool before we begin to understand that the planet is not warming? For how many years must cooling go on?
-->-- '''Geologist Dr. David Gee, professor at Uppsala University, Sweden'''
-> "Future generations will wonder in bemused amazement that the early 21st century's developed world went into hysterical panic over a globally averaged temperature increase of a few tenths of a degree, and, on the basis of gross exaggerations of highly uncertain computer projections combined into implausible chains of inference, proceeded to contemplate a roll-back of the industrial age."
-->-- '''Richard Lindzen, MIT'''
-> "We may have just passed a point of no return when it comes to Earth's climate. The low point of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere typically occurs around the last week of September. But this year, levels of late have failed to drop below 400 parts per million (ppm) – and it looks like they're not going to. Brief excursions towards lower values are still possible but it already seems safe to conclude that we won’t be seeing a monthly value below 400 ppm this year – or ever again for the indefinite future."
-->-- '''Ralph Keeling, director of the Scripps CO2 Program at the University of California-San Diego's Scripps Institution of Oceanography, when the carbon levels crossed a possibly irreversible threshold in 2016.'''
----
<<|QuotesWiki|>>
-->--'''Creator/GeorgeCarlin'''
-> The absolutely best case scenario - which in my opinion is unrealistic - with the minimum expected climate change... we end up with an estimate of 9% [of all species] facing extinction.
-->-- '''Chris Thomas, ecologist at the University of Leeds'''
-> Even doubling or tripling the amount of carbon dioxide will virtually have little impact, as water vapour and water condensed on particles as clouds dominate the worldwide scene and always will.
-->-- '''Geoffrey G. Duffy, Chemicals and Materials engineering professor at the University of Auckland, New Zealand'''
-> Unless we stop dumping 70 million tons of global warming pollution into the atmosphere every 24 hours, which we are doing right now ... the continued acceleration of this pollution would destroy the future of human civilization.
-->-- '''Al Gore, former U.S. vice-president and Nobel Peace prize winner'''
-> For how many years must the planet cool before we begin to understand that the planet is not warming? For how many years must cooling go on?
-->-- '''Geologist Dr. David Gee, professor at Uppsala University, Sweden'''
-> "Future generations will wonder in bemused amazement that the early 21st century's developed world went into hysterical panic over a globally averaged temperature increase of a few tenths of a degree, and, on the basis of gross exaggerations of highly uncertain computer projections combined into implausible chains of inference, proceeded to contemplate a roll-back of the industrial age."
-->-- '''Richard Lindzen, MIT'''
-> "We may have just passed a point of no return when it comes to Earth's climate. The low point of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere typically occurs around the last week of September. But this year, levels of late have failed to drop below 400 parts per million (ppm) – and it looks like they're not going to. Brief excursions towards lower values are still possible but it already seems safe to conclude that we won’t be seeing a monthly value below 400 ppm this year – or ever again for the indefinite future."
-->-- '''Ralph Keeling, director of the Scripps CO2 Program at the University of California-San Diego's Scripps Institution of Oceanography, when the carbon levels crossed a possibly irreversible threshold in 2016.'''
----
<<|QuotesWiki|>>
to:
-->--'''Creator/GeorgeCarlin'''
-> The absolutely best case scenario - which in my opinion is unrealistic - with the minimum expected climate change... we end up with an estimate of 9% [of all species] facing extinction.
-->-- '''Chris Thomas, ecologist at the University of Leeds'''
-> Even doubling or tripling the amount of carbon dioxide will virtually have little impact, as water vapour and water condensed on particles as clouds dominate the worldwide scene and always will.
-->-- '''Geoffrey G. Duffy, Chemicals and Materials engineering professor at the University of Auckland, New Zealand'''
-> Unless we stop dumping 70 million tons of global warming pollution into the atmosphere every 24 hours, which we are doing right now ... the continued acceleration of this pollution would destroy the future of human civilization.
-->-- '''Al Gore, former U.S. vice-president and Nobel Peace prize winner'''
-> For how many years must the planet cool before we begin to understand that the planet is not warming? For how many years must cooling go on?
-->-- '''Geologist Dr. David Gee, professor at Uppsala University, Sweden'''
-> "Future generations will wonder in bemused amazement that the early 21st century's developed world went into hysterical panic over a globally averaged temperature increase of a few tenths of a degree, and, on the basis of gross exaggerations of highly uncertain computer projections combined into implausible chains of inference, proceeded to contemplate a roll-back of the industrial age."
-->-- '''Richard Lindzen, MIT'''
-> "We may have just passed a point of no return when it comes to Earth's climate. The low point of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere typically occurs around the last week of September. But this year, levels of late have failed to drop below 400 parts per million (ppm) – and it looks like they're not going to. Brief excursions towards lower values are still possible but it already seems safe to conclude that we won’t be seeing a monthly value below 400 ppm this year – or ever again for the indefinite future."
-->-- '''Ralph Keeling, director of the Scripps CO2 Program at the University of California-San Diego's Scripps Institution of Oceanography, when the carbon levels crossed a possibly irreversible threshold in 2016.'''
----
<<|QuotesWiki|>>
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 58,59 (click to see context) from:
-> "We may have just passed a point of no return when it comes to Earth's climate. The low point of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere typically occurs around the last week of September. But this year, levels of late have failed to drop below 400 parts per million (ppm) – and it looks like they're not going to. "Brief excursions towards lower values are still possible but it already seems safe to conclude that we won’t be seeing a monthly value below 400 ppm this year – or ever again for the indefinite future," Ralph Keeling, director of the Scripps CO2 Program at the University of California-San Diego's Scripps Institution of Oceanography, wrote Friday."
-->-- '''US News, when the carbon levels crossed the 400 ppm threshold in September 2016'''
-->-- '''US News, when the carbon levels crossed the 400 ppm threshold in September 2016'''
to:
-> "We may have just passed a point of no return when it comes to Earth's climate. The low point of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere typically occurs around the last week of September. But this year, levels of late have failed to drop below 400 parts per million (ppm) – and it looks like they're not going to. "Brief Brief excursions towards lower values are still possible but it already seems safe to conclude that we won’t be seeing a monthly value below 400 ppm this year – or ever again for the indefinite future," Ralph Keeling, director of the Scripps CO2 Program at the University of California-San Diego's Scripps Institution of Oceanography, wrote Friday.future."
-->--'''US News, '''Ralph Keeling, director of the Scripps CO2 Program at the University of California-San Diego's Scripps Institution of Oceanography, when the carbon levels crossed the 400 ppm a possibly irreversible threshold in September 2016'''2016.'''
-->--
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 58,62 (click to see context) from:
-> "We may have just passed a point of no return when it comes to Earth's climate.
The low point of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere typically occurs around the last week of September. But this year, levels of late have failed to drop below 400 parts per million (ppm) – and it looks like they're not going to.
"Brief excursions towards lower values are still possible but it already seems safe to conclude that we won’t be seeing a monthly value below 400 ppm this year – or ever again for the indefinite future," Ralph Keeling, director of the Scripps CO2 Program at the University of California-San Diego's Scripps Institution of Oceanography, wrote Friday."
The low point of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere typically occurs around the last week of September. But this year, levels of late have failed to drop below 400 parts per million (ppm) – and it looks like they're not going to.
"Brief excursions towards lower values are still possible but it already seems safe to conclude that we won’t be seeing a monthly value below 400 ppm this year – or ever again for the indefinite future," Ralph Keeling, director of the Scripps CO2 Program at the University of California-San Diego's Scripps Institution of Oceanography, wrote Friday."
to:
-> "We may have just passed a point of no return when it comes to Earth's climate.
climate. The low point of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere typically occurs around the last week of September. But this year, levels of late have failed to drop below 400 parts per million (ppm) – and it looks like they're not going to.
to. "Brief excursions towards lower values are still possible but it already seems safe to conclude that we won’t be seeing a monthly value below 400 ppm this year – or ever again for the indefinite future," Ralph Keeling, director of the Scripps CO2 Program at the University of California-San Diego's Scripps Institution of Oceanography, wrote Friday."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
-> "We may have just passed a point of no return when it comes to Earth's climate.
The low point of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere typically occurs around the last week of September. But this year, levels of late have failed to drop below 400 parts per million (ppm) – and it looks like they're not going to.
"Brief excursions towards lower values are still possible but it already seems safe to conclude that we won’t be seeing a monthly value below 400 ppm this year – or ever again for the indefinite future," Ralph Keeling, director of the Scripps CO2 Program at the University of California-San Diego's Scripps Institution of Oceanography, wrote Friday."
-->-- '''US News, when the carbon levels crossed the 400 ppm threshold in September 2016'''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Putting back all the quotes jonnyfog deleted for no reason given
Added DiffLines:
-> I have spent a long research career studying physics that is closely related to the greenhouse effect...Fears about man-made global warming are unwarranted and are not based on good science....The earth's climate is changing now, as it always has. There is no evidence that the changes differ in any qualitative way from those of the past.
-->-- '''Dr. Will Happer, Princeton physicist'''
-> It is a blatant lie put forth in the media that makes it seem there is only a fringe of scientists who don't buy into anthropogenic global warming.
-->-- '''U.S Government Atmospheric Scientist Stanley B. Goldenberg of the Hurricane Research Division of NOAA'''
-> There is broad agreement within the scientific community that amplification of the Earth's natural greenhouse effect by the buildup of various gases introduced by human activity has the potential to produce dramatic changes in climate. Only by taking action now can we ensure that future generations will not be put at risk.
-->-- '''Statement by 49 Nobel Prize winners and 700 members of the National Academy of Sciences, 1990'''
-->-- '''Dr. Will Happer, Princeton physicist'''
-> It is a blatant lie put forth in the media that makes it seem there is only a fringe of scientists who don't buy into anthropogenic global warming.
-->-- '''U.S Government Atmospheric Scientist Stanley B. Goldenberg of the Hurricane Research Division of NOAA'''
-> There is broad agreement within the scientific community that amplification of the Earth's natural greenhouse effect by the buildup of various gases introduced by human activity has the potential to produce dramatic changes in climate. Only by taking action now can we ensure that future generations will not be put at risk.
-->-- '''Statement by 49 Nobel Prize winners and 700 members of the National Academy of Sciences, 1990'''
Added DiffLines:
-> The absolutely best case scenario - which in my opinion is unrealistic - with the minimum expected climate change... we end up with an estimate of 9% [of all species] facing extinction.
-->-- '''Chris Thomas, ecologist at the University of Leeds'''
-> Even doubling or tripling the amount of carbon dioxide will virtually have little impact, as water vapour and water condensed on particles as clouds dominate the worldwide scene and always will.
-->-- '''Geoffrey G. Duffy, Chemicals and Materials engineering professor at the University of Auckland, New Zealand'''
-> Unless we stop dumping 70 million tons of global warming pollution into the atmosphere every 24 hours, which we are doing right now ... the continued acceleration of this pollution would destroy the future of human civilization.
-->-- '''Al Gore, former U.S. vice-president and Nobel Peace prize winner'''
-> For how many years must the planet cool before we begin to understand that the planet is not warming? For how many years must cooling go on?
-->-- '''Geologist Dr. David Gee, professor at Uppsala University, Sweden'''
-> "Future generations will wonder in bemused amazement that the early 21st century's developed world went into hysterical panic over a globally averaged temperature increase of a few tenths of a degree, and, on the basis of gross exaggerations of highly uncertain computer projections combined into implausible chains of inference, proceeded to contemplate a roll-back of the industrial age."
-->-- '''Richard Lindzen, MIT'''
-->-- '''Chris Thomas, ecologist at the University of Leeds'''
-> Even doubling or tripling the amount of carbon dioxide will virtually have little impact, as water vapour and water condensed on particles as clouds dominate the worldwide scene and always will.
-->-- '''Geoffrey G. Duffy, Chemicals and Materials engineering professor at the University of Auckland, New Zealand'''
-> Unless we stop dumping 70 million tons of global warming pollution into the atmosphere every 24 hours, which we are doing right now ... the continued acceleration of this pollution would destroy the future of human civilization.
-->-- '''Al Gore, former U.S. vice-president and Nobel Peace prize winner'''
-> For how many years must the planet cool before we begin to understand that the planet is not warming? For how many years must cooling go on?
-->-- '''Geologist Dr. David Gee, professor at Uppsala University, Sweden'''
-> "Future generations will wonder in bemused amazement that the early 21st century's developed world went into hysterical panic over a globally averaged temperature increase of a few tenths of a degree, and, on the basis of gross exaggerations of highly uncertain computer projections combined into implausible chains of inference, proceeded to contemplate a roll-back of the industrial age."
-->-- '''Richard Lindzen, MIT'''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 28 (click to see context) from:
->We’re going away. Pack your shit, folks. We’re going away. And we won’t leave much of a trace, either. Maybe a little Styrofoam.
to:
-->--'''Wiki/RationalWiki'''
->Pack your shit, folks. We’re going away. And we won’t leave much of a trace, either. Maybe a little Styrofoam.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4,7 (click to see context) from:
-> I have spent a long research career studying physics that is closely related to the greenhouse effect...Fears about man-made global warming are unwarranted and are not based on good science....The earth's climate is changing now, as it always has. There is no evidence that the changes differ in any qualitative way from those of the past.
-->-- '''Dr. Will Happer, Princeton physicist'''
-> There's a better scientific consensus on this than on any issue I know -- except maybe Newton's second law of dynamics...Man has reached the point where his impact on the climate can be as significant as nature's.
-->-- '''Dr. Will Happer, Princeton physicist'''
-> There's a better scientific consensus on this than on any issue I know -- except maybe Newton's second law of dynamics...Man has reached the point where his impact on the climate can be as significant as nature's.
to:
-->-- '''Dr. Will Happer, Princeton physicist'''
-> There's a better scientific consensus on this than on any issue I know -- except maybe Newton's second law of dynamics...Man
Deleted line(s) 10,15 (click to see context) :
-> It is a blatant lie put forth in the media that makes it seem there is only a fringe of scientists who don't buy into anthropogenic global warming.
-->-- '''U.S Government Atmospheric Scientist Stanley B. Goldenberg of the Hurricane Research Division of NOAA'''
-> There is broad agreement within the scientific community that amplification of the Earth's natural greenhouse effect by the buildup of various gases introduced by human activity has the potential to produce dramatic changes in climate. Only by taking action now can we ensure that future generations will not be put at risk.
-->-- '''Statement by 49 Nobel Prize winners and 700 members of the National Academy of Sciences, 1990'''
-->-- '''U.S Government Atmospheric Scientist Stanley B. Goldenberg of the Hurricane Research Division of NOAA'''
-> There is broad agreement within the scientific community that amplification of the Earth's natural greenhouse effect by the buildup of various gases introduced by human activity has the potential to produce dramatic changes in climate. Only by taking action now can we ensure that future generations will not be put at risk.
-->-- '''Statement by 49 Nobel Prize winners and 700 members of the National Academy of Sciences, 1990'''
Deleted line(s) 19,33 (click to see context) :
-> I have not been one who believed in the global warming. But I tell you, they are making a convert out of me as these blistering summers. They have broken heat records in a number of cities already this year and broken all-time records and it is getting hotter and the ice caps are melting and there is a build up of carbon dioxide in the air. We really need to address the burning of fossil fuels."
-->-- '''Pat Robertson of the 700 Club'''
-> The [=IPCC=] has actually become a closed circuit; it doesn't listen to others. It doesn't have open minds... I am really amazed that the Nobel Peace Prize has been given on scientifically incorrect conclusions by people who are not geologists.
-->-- '''Indian geologist Dr. Arun D. Ahluwalia at Punjab University'''
-> The European records, being so long, make a convincing case that we're already seeing changes ... This is not like "Centuries from now the ice sheets will melt." This is "In a few decades it will be dramatically different." To me, that's alarming.
-->-- '''Drew Shindell, NASA physicist'''
-> [=CO2=] emissions have been increasing, but the rise in air temperature stopped around 2001. Climate change is due in large part to naturally occurring oscillations.
-->-- '''Syunichi Akasofu, professor emeritus at the University of Alaska'''
-> [W]hen we look at the graphs of rising ocean temperatures, rising carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and so on, we know that they are climbing far more steeply than can be accounted for by the natural oscillation of the weather ... What people (must) do is to change their behavior and their attitudes ... If we do care about our grandchildren then we have to do something, and we have to demand that our governments do something.
-->-- '''David Attenborough, naturalist'''
-->-- '''Pat Robertson of the 700 Club'''
-> The [=IPCC=] has actually become a closed circuit; it doesn't listen to others. It doesn't have open minds... I am really amazed that the Nobel Peace Prize has been given on scientifically incorrect conclusions by people who are not geologists.
-->-- '''Indian geologist Dr. Arun D. Ahluwalia at Punjab University'''
-> The European records, being so long, make a convincing case that we're already seeing changes ... This is not like "Centuries from now the ice sheets will melt." This is "In a few decades it will be dramatically different." To me, that's alarming.
-->-- '''Drew Shindell, NASA physicist'''
-> [=CO2=] emissions have been increasing, but the rise in air temperature stopped around 2001. Climate change is due in large part to naturally occurring oscillations.
-->-- '''Syunichi Akasofu, professor emeritus at the University of Alaska'''
-> [W]hen we look at the graphs of rising ocean temperatures, rising carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and so on, we know that they are climbing far more steeply than can be accounted for by the natural oscillation of the weather ... What people (must) do is to change their behavior and their attitudes ... If we do care about our grandchildren then we have to do something, and we have to demand that our governments do something.
-->-- '''David Attenborough, naturalist'''
Changed line(s) 37,49 (click to see context) from:
-> The absolutely best case scenario - which in my opinion is unrealistic - with the minimum expected climate change... we end up with an estimate of 9% [of all species] facing extinction.
-->-- '''Chris Thomas, ecologist at the University of Leeds'''
-> Even doubling or tripling the amount of carbon dioxide will virtually have little impact, as water vapour and water condensed on particles as clouds dominate the worldwide scene and always will.
-->-- '''Geoffrey G. Duffy, Chemicals and Materials engineering professor at the University of Auckland, New Zealand'''
-> Unless we stop dumping 70 million tons of global warming pollution into the atmosphere every 24 hours, which we are doing right now ... the continued acceleration of this pollution would destroy the future of human civilization.
-->-- '''Al Gore, former U.S. vice-president and Nobel Peace prize winner'''
-> For how many years must the planet cool before we begin to understand that the planet is not warming? For how many years must cooling go on?
-->-- '''Geologist Dr. David Gee, professor at Uppsala University, Sweden'''
-> It used to be controversial whether smoking caused lung cancer, it used to be controversial whether HIV caused AIDS. Now, there are a few mavericks who deny those things. In the case of climate change, I think the debate is going the same way in that there is a strong consensus that it is a serious matter.
-->-- '''Chris Thomas, ecologist at the University of Leeds'''
-> Even doubling or tripling the amount of carbon dioxide will virtually have little impact, as water vapour and water condensed on particles as clouds dominate the worldwide scene and always will.
-->-- '''Geoffrey G. Duffy, Chemicals and Materials engineering professor at the University of Auckland, New Zealand'''
-> Unless we stop dumping 70 million tons of global warming pollution into the atmosphere every 24 hours, which we are doing right now ... the continued acceleration of this pollution would destroy the future of human civilization.
-->-- '''Al Gore, former U.S. vice-president and Nobel Peace prize winner'''
-> For how many years must the planet cool before we begin to understand that the planet is not warming? For how many years must cooling go on?
-->-- '''Geologist Dr. David Gee, professor at Uppsala University, Sweden'''
-> It used to be controversial whether smoking caused lung cancer, it used to be controversial whether HIV caused AIDS. Now, there are a few mavericks who deny those things. In the case of climate change, I think the debate is going the same way in that there is a strong consensus that it is a serious matter.
to:
-->-- '''Chris Thomas, ecologist at the University of Leeds'''
-> Even doubling or tripling the amount of carbon dioxide will virtually
-->-- '''Geoffrey G. Duffy, Chemicals and Materials engineering professor at the University of Auckland, New Zealand'''
-> Unless we stop dumping 70 million tons of global warming
-->-- '''Al Gore, former U.S. vice-president
-> For how many years must
-->--'''UsefulNotes/TonyBlair'''
->This time it is not
-->-- '''Geologist Dr. David Gee, professor at Uppsala University, Sweden'''
-->--'''UsefulNotes/AlGore'''
->Now the climate is about to do to us what [[LaserGuidedKarma we have done to Iraq and other oil producers.]]
-->--'''Creator/GoreVidal'''
-> It used to be controversial whether smoking caused lung cancer, it used to be controversial whether HIV caused AIDS. Now, there are a few mavericks who deny those things.
Changed line(s) 52 (click to see context) from:
-> Global warming causing climate change may be the ultimate issue that unites us all.
to:
-> Global warming causing climate change may be the ultimate issue that [[EnemyMine unites us all.]]
Changed line(s) 55,57 (click to see context) from:
-> "Future generations will wonder in bemused amazement that the early 21st century's developed world went into hysterical panic over a globally averaged temperature increase of a few tenths of a degree, and, on the basis of gross exaggerations of highly uncertain computer projections combined into implausible chains of inference, proceeded to contemplate a roll-back of the industrial age."
-->-- '''Richard Lindzen, MIT'''
-->-- '''Richard Lindzen, MIT'''
to:
-->-- '''Richard Lindzen, MIT'''
-->--'''Creator/GeorgeCarlin'''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:
-> It is a blatant lie put forth in the media that makes it seem there is only a fringe of scientists who don’t buy into anthropogenic global warming.
to:
-> It is a blatant lie put forth in the media that makes it seem there is only a fringe of scientists who don’t don't buy into anthropogenic global warming.
Changed line(s) 22 (click to see context) from:
-> The [=IPCC=] has actually become a closed circuit; it doesn’t listen to others. It doesn’t have open minds… I am really amazed that the Nobel Peace Prize has been given on scientifically incorrect conclusions by people who are not geologists.
to:
-> The [=IPCC=] has actually become a closed circuit; it doesn’t doesn't listen to others. It doesn’t doesn't have open minds… minds... I am really amazed that the Nobel Peace Prize has been given on scientifically incorrect conclusions by people who are not geologists.
Changed line(s) 35,36 (click to see context) from:
-->-- '''Miklós Zágoni, physicist and environmental researcher'''
to:
-->-- '''Miklós Zágoni, '''Miklós Zágoni, physicist and environmental researcher'''
Changed line(s) 43 (click to see context) from:
-> Unless we stop dumping 70 million tons of global warming pollution into the atmosphere every 24 hours, which we are doing right now … the continued acceleration of this pollution would destroy the future of human civilization.
to:
-> Unless we stop dumping 70 million tons of global warming pollution into the atmosphere every 24 hours, which we are doing right now … now ... the continued acceleration of this pollution would destroy the future of human civilization.
Changed line(s) 55 (click to see context) from:
-> "Future generations will wonder in bemused amazement that the early 21st century’s developed world went into hysterical panic over a globally averaged temperature increase of a few tenths of a degree, and, on the basis of gross exaggerations of highly uncertain computer projections combined into implausible chains of inference, proceeded to contemplate a roll-back of the industrial age.â€
to:
-> "Future generations will wonder in bemused amazement that the early 21st century’s century's developed world went into hysterical panic over a globally averaged temperature increase of a few tenths of a degree, and, on the basis of gross exaggerations of highly uncertain computer projections combined into implausible chains of inference, proceeded to contemplate a roll-back of the industrial age.†"
Changed line(s) 59 (click to see context) from:
<<|QuotesWiki|>>
to:
<<|QuotesWiki|>>