Follow TV Tropes

Following

History MisaimedFandom / WebMedia

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Some internet circles call this phenomenon a "Torment Nexus", after a [[https://twitter.com/AlexBlechman/status/1457842724128833538 Twitter post]] by Alex Blechman that satirizes the trend. In it, a famous sci-fi writer created the book ''Don't Create the Torment Nexus'' as a cautionary tale, but a tech startup was such a big fan of the book that they built a real-life Torment Nexus as tribute to it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Kevin Temmer's [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8FA25a22dQ "Delete This Tweet"]] animation, a music video starring a boy band called the "Trash Binz" singing to the viewer about how they should perform the titular action, has been used by people on websites like Twitter as a response to arguments they disagree with… except that the video itself ''mocks'' this kind of mentality, and not even subtly. Putting aside the fact that the Trash Binz themselves are literally ''[[VisualPun anthropomorphic trash cans]]'', they're visually emphasized midway through the video as being [[CondescendingCompassion condescending]] [[HypocriticalHumor hypocrites]] who gorge on the prospects of gatekeeping people, [[TheGadfly stirring up drama for the sake of it]], or basking in the popular opinions of [[ConvictedByPublicOpinion the mob]] or an influential figure, and thus aren't liable to be any better than the party they're accusing. [[PoesLaw Despite its unironic use in some circles]], it's clear that the video's ''actual'' message is that those who insist others backslide on their opinions so adamantly are liable to be, well, [[{{Pun}} trashy]].

to:

* Kevin Temmer's [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8FA25a22dQ "Delete This Tweet"]] animation, a music video starring a boy band called the "Trash Binz" singing to the viewer about how they should perform the titular action, has been used by people on websites like Twitter as a response to arguments they disagree with… except that the video itself ''mocks'' this kind of mentality, and not even subtly. Putting aside the fact that the Trash Binz themselves are literally ''[[VisualPun anthropomorphic trash cans]]'', they're visually emphasized midway through the video as being [[CondescendingCompassion condescending]] [[HypocriticalHumor hypocrites]] who gorge on the prospects of gatekeeping people, [[TheGadfly stirring up drama for the sake of it]], or basking in the popular opinions of [[ConvictedByPublicOpinion the mob]] or an influential figure, and thus aren't liable to be any better than the party they're accusing. [[PoesLaw Despite its unironic use in some circles]], circles]] (which, given the subject matter, was likely [[IntendedAudienceReaction anticipated]] by the original animator regardless), it's clear that the video's ''actual'' message is that those who insist others backslide on their opinions so adamantly are liable to be, well, [[{{Pun}} trashy]].

Added: 893

Changed: 489

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The ''WebVideo/FilthyFrank'' video "Weeaboos" satirized people who are obsessed with anime and Japanese culture, and think that they can learn everything they need to know about Japan through anime. Many Filthy Frank fans believed he hated such people, calling everybody who demonstrates even a slight interest in anime and/or Japan out as a "weeaboo". This is despite Frank saying at the beginning of the video that he's got nothing against anime or people who watch it, and actually being born in Osaka himself.

to:

* ''WebVideo/FilthyFrank''
**
The ''WebVideo/FilthyFrank'' video show as a whole has a very misaimed interpretation from many fans, hailing Frank as a [[DoNotDoThisCoolThing cool rebel]] who challenges societal protocol by speaking his mind with no fear of retribution. In reality, Frank is a character explicitly stated to be "everything a person shouldn't be", most closely satirizing "edgelord" internet nerds who do nothing but troll for attention-seeking.
** The
"Weeaboos" video satirized people who are obsessed with anime and Japanese culture, and think that they can learn everything they need to know about Japan through anime. Many Filthy Frank fans believed he hated such people, calling everybody who demonstrates even a slight interest in anime and/or Japan out as a "weeaboo". This is despite Frank saying at the beginning of the video that he's got nothing against anime or people who watch it, and actually being born in Osaka himself.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** This was discussed by LetsPlay/{{Technoblade}} during [[https://youtu.be/7ZxlBge7iW8 one]] stream. He brought up a Twitter post he found in which numerous people praised him for not resorting to dark humor to be funny, when he's one of the biggest sources of CrossesTheLineTwice humor out of everyone in the SMP. He was understandably baffled by it.
--->''"I talk about punching orphans literally every ten minutes! Who's stream have they been watching?!"''

to:

** This was discussed by LetsPlay/{{Technoblade}} during [[https://youtu.be/7ZxlBge7iW8 one]] stream. He brought up a Twitter post he found in which numerous people praised him for not resorting to dark humor to be funny, when he's he was one of the biggest sources of CrossesTheLineTwice humor out of everyone in the SMP. He was understandably baffled by it.
--->''"I talk about punching orphans literally every ten minutes! Who's Whose stream have they been watching?!"''

Added: 459

Changed: 3

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** A very strange case occurs in mid-2021 with people outside the fandom. In Season 1, L'Manburg was founded to be a nation with a staunch stance against tyranny and police brutality, and intended to stand as a "special place" for people to be free from it. Unfortunately, its advocacy for freedom labelled it as a "freedom flag", thus attracting attention from the alt-right, who waved the L'Manburg flag on the same pole as a [=Trump2024=] flag during a London protest in late July 2021 against [[UsefulNotes/COVID19Pandemic COVID-19]] vaccinations from the government (to help mitigate, you know, a ''global pandemic''), which they saw as "tyrannical", without even knowing the context behind the flag. 3 of the 4 founders of L'Manburg (Wilbur, Tommy, and Tubbo) found this absolutely hilarious out-of-universe, and when this got on the ''[[https://www.msn.com/en-us/entertainment/gaming/someone-brought-a-dream-smp-minecraft-flag-to-an-anti-vax-rally/ar-AAMwvP6?ocid=cf-link news]]'', Quackity (a later member of L'Manburg) responded by [[https://twitter.com/Quackity/status/1420936436002344963 announcing on Twitter]] that Las Nevadas, his country on the SMP at the time, was offering free vaccinations.

to:

** A very strange case occurs occured in mid-2021 with people outside the fandom. In Season 1, L'Manburg was founded to be a nation with a staunch stance against tyranny and police brutality, and intended to stand as a "special place" for people to be free from it. Unfortunately, its advocacy for freedom labelled it as a "freedom flag", thus attracting attention from the alt-right, who waved the L'Manburg flag on the same pole as a [=Trump2024=] flag during a London protest in late July 2021 against [[UsefulNotes/COVID19Pandemic COVID-19]] vaccinations from the government (to help mitigate, you know, a ''global pandemic''), which they saw as "tyrannical", without even knowing the context behind the flag. 3 of the 4 founders of L'Manburg (Wilbur, Tommy, and Tubbo) found this absolutely hilarious out-of-universe, and when this got on the ''[[https://www.msn.com/en-us/entertainment/gaming/someone-brought-a-dream-smp-minecraft-flag-to-an-anti-vax-rally/ar-AAMwvP6?ocid=cf-link news]]'', Quackity (a later member of L'Manburg) responded by [[https://twitter.com/Quackity/status/1420936436002344963 announcing on Twitter]] that Las Nevadas, his country on the SMP at the time, was offering free vaccinations.vaccinations.
** This was discussed by LetsPlay/{{Technoblade}} during [[https://youtu.be/7ZxlBge7iW8 one]] stream. He brought up a Twitter post he found in which numerous people praised him for not resorting to dark humor to be funny, when he's one of the biggest sources of CrossesTheLineTwice humor out of everyone in the SMP. He was understandably baffled by it.
--->''"I talk about punching orphans literally every ten minutes! Who's stream have they been watching?!"''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Trope has been disambiguated.


** Somewhat related, Lindsay has expressed annoyance that many fanboys seem to think WebVideo/TheNostalgiaChick is a "[[CloserToEarth good person]]" when she's really a fucked up bitch with an InferioritySuperiorityComplex.

to:

** Somewhat related, Lindsay has expressed annoyance that many fanboys seem to think WebVideo/TheNostalgiaChick is a "[[CloserToEarth good person]]" "good person" when she's really a fucked up bitch with an InferioritySuperiorityComplex.

Added: 445

Changed: 294

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The [[FirstLawOfGenderBending three]] [[SecondLawOfGenderBending laws of]] [[ThirdLawOfGenderBending gender bending]] were coined to show that the stereotypical GenderBending plot is ''fundamentally flawed'', as the characters don't react anything like an actual human being would to their situation. Fans of the genre seem to take them as guidelines.

to:

* The Someone once pointed out some common traits about GenderBender stories - [[FirstLawOfGenderBending three]] most of these stories involve men turning into women and being unable to change back]], these ex-men [[SecondLawOfGenderBending laws of]] usually end up accepting or enjoying their new gender]], and [[ThirdLawOfGenderBending gender bending]] were coined they submit themselves to that gender's stereotypes]]. This was meant to show that the stereotypical GenderBending plot is ''fundamentally flawed'', as the characters don't react anything like an actual human being would to their situation. Fans of the genre seem to take them as guidelines.


Added DiffLines:

* The "Stonks" meme is supposed to be sarcastic. Normal memes using the format describe someone earning money in an unusual and/or counter-productive way, and the "Stonks" image shows that they're ignorant about the issues with their methods and still feel proud about their earnings. So, of course, actual stock trading and cryptocurrency enthusiasts started using the "Meme Man" character as a mascot and referring to their earnings as Stonks.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Forgot to add the link to the RWBY clean-up thread. Apologies.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
This was a consensus-created entry back when the RWBY misaimed fandom page existed (since the page no longer exists, the last surviving record of a consensus write-up being involved is here, from a ban-evader clean-up). I've restored the original entry, since this entry was changed without consensus. As it inserted complaining, I've flagged my edit on the Complaining clean-up thread..


** Ironwood has a devoted fanbase who see him as a strong military leader who can make the tough choices when his allies cannot, and who dislike the protagonists as naïve heroes endangering lives with their idealism. They feel Volumes 7-8 portrayed Ironwood as being the only person with a plan to save some lives in contrast to Team RWBY, who wanted to endanger everyone's lives due to having no plan to save anyone and no will to make the tough call to guarantee the salvation of some. They therefore believe that Ironwood was derailed into the role of a ruthless, impotent villain in favour of ProtagonistCenteredMorality. All of the above completely ignores that Ironwood has been a consistently [[GeneralFailure incompetent military leader]], with his best moments usually only when working with others and his worst moments [[ChronicBackstabbingDisorder when he goes behind their backs and undermines their efforts due to his ego.]] Furthermore, despite the claims of him being the one who "makes the tough decisions", it consistently ignores how many of those decisions only come about as a result of his bad decisions in earlier volumes, and [[NeverMyFault how his actions basically involve running away from his mistakes]] when he finds that he is not able to resolve the matter by himself. Finally, despite the claims of Team RWBY and the heroes being naive idealists, they are the ones who have to cobble together a plan with minimal resources despite dealing with two separate factions bearing down on them, having to accept the loss of an entire nation to save as many people as possible, whereas Ironwood is consistently blocking them from executing these plans [[ItsAllAboutMe because he cannot accept the idea that the situation can be resolved without him being the most important figure involved]], and that his "plan" was nothing more than a [[KillThePoor abandoning Mantle's poor in order to save the elite of Atlas]], and in the longer term such an abandonment would have left Remnant defenseless against Salem. The backlash was so strong that the writers pointed out that Ironwood had been portrayed as a deeply flawed individual from the beginning, and that he was meant to be regarded as unambiguously villainous by the end of Volume 7.

to:

** Ironwood has a devoted fanbase who see him as a strong military leader who can make the tough choices when his allies cannot, and who dislike the protagonists as naïve heroes endangering lives with their idealism. They feel Volumes 7-8 portrayed Ironwood as being the only person with a plan to save some lives in contrast to Team RWBY, who wanted to endanger everyone's lives due to having no plan to save anyone and no will to make the tough call to guarantee the salvation of some. They therefore believe that Ironwood was derailed into the role of a ruthless, impotent villain in favour of ProtagonistCenteredMorality. All of the above completely ignores that Ironwood has been a consistently [[GeneralFailure incompetent military leader]], with his best moments usually only when working with others and his worst moments [[ChronicBackstabbingDisorder when he goes behind their backs and undermines their efforts due to his ego.]] Furthermore, despite the claims of him being the one who "makes the tough decisions", it consistently ignores how many of those decisions only come about as a result of his bad decisions in earlier volumes, and [[NeverMyFault how his actions basically involve running away from his mistakes]] when he finds that he is not able to resolve the matter by himself. Finally, despite the claims of Team RWBY and the heroes being naive idealists, they are the ones who have to cobble together a plan with minimal resources despite dealing with two separate factions bearing down on them, having to accept the loss of an entire nation to save as many people as possible, whereas Ironwood is consistently blocking them from executing these plans [[ItsAllAboutMe because he cannot accept the idea that the situation can be resolved without him being the most important figure involved]], and that his "plan" was nothing more than a [[KillThePoor abandoning Mantle's poor in order to save the elite of Atlas]], and in the longer term such an abandonment would have left Remnant defenseless against Salem.ProtagonistCentredMorality. The backlash was so strong that the writers pointed out that Ironwood had been portrayed as a deeply flawed individual from the beginning, and that he was meant to be regarded as unambiguously villainous by the end of Volume 7.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The ''LetsPlay/DreamSMP'' fandom is ''rife'' with this.

to:

* The ''LetsPlay/DreamSMP'' ''WebVideo/DreamSMP'' fandom is ''rife'' with this.



** A very strange case occurs in mid-2021 with people outside the fandom. In Season 1, L'Manburg was founded to be a nation with a staunch stance against tyranny and police brutality, and intended to stand as a "special place" for people to be free from it. Unfortunately, its advocation for freedom labelled it as a "freedom flag", thus attracting attention from the alt-right, who waved the L'Manburg flag on the same pole as a [=Trump2024=] flag during a London protest in late July 2021 against [[UsefulNotes/COVID19Pandemic COVID-19]] vaccinations from the government (to help mitigate, you know, a ''global pandemic''), which they saw as "tyrannical", without even knowing the context behind the flag. 3 of the 4 founders of L'Manburg (Wilbur, Tommy, and Tubbo) found this absolutely hilarious out-of-universe, and when this got on the ''[[https://www.msn.com/en-us/entertainment/gaming/someone-brought-a-dream-smp-minecraft-flag-to-an-anti-vax-rally/ar-AAMwvP6?ocid=cf-link news]]'', Quackity (a later member of L'Manburg) responded by [[https://twitter.com/Quackity/status/1420936436002344963 announcing on Twitter]] that Las Nevadas, his country on the SMP at the time, was offering free vaccinations.

to:

** A very strange case occurs in mid-2021 with people outside the fandom. In Season 1, L'Manburg was founded to be a nation with a staunch stance against tyranny and police brutality, and intended to stand as a "special place" for people to be free from it. Unfortunately, its advocation advocacy for freedom labelled it as a "freedom flag", thus attracting attention from the alt-right, who waved the L'Manburg flag on the same pole as a [=Trump2024=] flag during a London protest in late July 2021 against [[UsefulNotes/COVID19Pandemic COVID-19]] vaccinations from the government (to help mitigate, you know, a ''global pandemic''), which they saw as "tyrannical", without even knowing the context behind the flag. 3 of the 4 founders of L'Manburg (Wilbur, Tommy, and Tubbo) found this absolutely hilarious out-of-universe, and when this got on the ''[[https://www.msn.com/en-us/entertainment/gaming/someone-brought-a-dream-smp-minecraft-flag-to-an-anti-vax-rally/ar-AAMwvP6?ocid=cf-link news]]'', Quackity (a later member of L'Manburg) responded by [[https://twitter.com/Quackity/status/1420936436002344963 announcing on Twitter]] that Las Nevadas, his country on the SMP at the time, was offering free vaccinations.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Related to the above, ''WebVideo/CinemaSins'' themselves:
** Many people have actually taken their "Criticism" as actual reviews or indicators of a film's quality. This, despite that [=CinemaSins=] routinely uses [[RunningGag Running gags]], ManipulativeEditing, and in-jokes as humour.
** Similarly, many people also have taken them to assume that this is how criticism is supposed to be. The result is a lot of people who don't know that [=CinemaSins=] is a ''joke'' and this has caused people to likewise tell aspiring writer(s) and creator(s) to spell out literally everything.
** [=CinemaSins=] also holds the amount of {{Blooper}}s against a movie as "proof" of its poor quality. This actually isn't intentional - there are numerous reasons ''why'' these things "slip past the editors" such as a lack of good take(s), genuine mistakes, or the blooper itself being so subtle it was assumed nobody would actually see it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Ironwood has a devoted fanbase who see him as a strong military leader who can make the tough choices when his allies cannot, and who dislike the protagonists as naïve heroes endangering lives with their idealism. They feel Volumes 7-8 portrayed Ironwood as being the only person with a plan to save some lives in contrast to Team RWBY, who wanted to endanger everyone's lives due to having no plan to save anyone and no will to make the tough call to guarantee the salvation of some. They therefore believe that Ironwood was derailed into the role of a ruthless, impotent villain in favour of ProtagonistCenteredMorality. All of the above completely ignores that Ironwood has been a consistently incompetent military leader, with his best moments usually only when working with others and his worst moments [[ChronicBackstabbingDisorder when he goes behind their backs and undermines their efforts due to his ego.]] Furthermore, despite the claims of him being the one who "makes the tough decisions", it consistently ignores how many of those decisions only come about as a result of his bad decisions in earlier volumes, and [[DirtyCoward how his actions basically involve running away from his mistakes]] when he finds that he is not able to resolve the matter by himself. Finally, despite the claims of Team RWBY and the heroes being naive idealists, they are the ones who have to cobble together a plan despite dealing with two separate factions bearing down on them, having to accept the loss of an entire nation to save as many people as possible, whereas Ironwood is consistently blocking them from executing these plans [[ItsAllAboutMe because he cannot accept the idea that the situation can be resolved without him being the most important figure involved]], and that his "plan" was nothing more than a [[KillThePoor form of genocide against Mantle's poor]], and in the longer term would have left Remnant defenseless against Salem. The backlash was so strong that the writers pointed out that Ironwood had been portrayed as a deeply flawed individual from the beginning, and that he was meant to be regarded as unambiguously villainous by the end of Volume 7.

to:

** Ironwood has a devoted fanbase who see him as a strong military leader who can make the tough choices when his allies cannot, and who dislike the protagonists as naïve heroes endangering lives with their idealism. They feel Volumes 7-8 portrayed Ironwood as being the only person with a plan to save some lives in contrast to Team RWBY, who wanted to endanger everyone's lives due to having no plan to save anyone and no will to make the tough call to guarantee the salvation of some. They therefore believe that Ironwood was derailed into the role of a ruthless, impotent villain in favour of ProtagonistCenteredMorality. All of the above completely ignores that Ironwood has been a consistently [[GeneralFailure incompetent military leader, leader]], with his best moments usually only when working with others and his worst moments [[ChronicBackstabbingDisorder when he goes behind their backs and undermines their efforts due to his ego.]] Furthermore, despite the claims of him being the one who "makes the tough decisions", it consistently ignores how many of those decisions only come about as a result of his bad decisions in earlier volumes, and [[DirtyCoward [[NeverMyFault how his actions basically involve running away from his mistakes]] when he finds that he is not able to resolve the matter by himself. Finally, despite the claims of Team RWBY and the heroes being naive idealists, they are the ones who have to cobble together a plan with minimal resources despite dealing with two separate factions bearing down on them, having to accept the loss of an entire nation to save as many people as possible, whereas Ironwood is consistently blocking them from executing these plans [[ItsAllAboutMe because he cannot accept the idea that the situation can be resolved without him being the most important figure involved]], and that his "plan" was nothing more than a [[KillThePoor form of genocide against abandoning Mantle's poor]], poor in order to save the elite of Atlas]], and in the longer term such an abandonment would have left Remnant defenseless against Salem. The backlash was so strong that the writers pointed out that Ironwood had been portrayed as a deeply flawed individual from the beginning, and that he was meant to be regarded as unambiguously villainous by the end of Volume 7.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Ironwood has a devoted fanbase who see him as a strong military leader who can make the tough choices when his allies cannot, and who dislike the protagonists as naïve heroes endangering lives with their idealism. They feel Volumes 7-8 portrayed Ironwood as being the only person with a plan to save some lives in contrast to Team RWBY, who wanted to endanger everyone's lives due to having no plan to save anyone and no will to make the tough call to guarantee the salvation of some. They therefore believe that Ironwood was derailed into the role of a ruthless, impotent villain in favour of ProtagonistCenteredMorality. All of the above completely ignores that Ironwood has been a consistently incompetent military leader, with his best moments usually only when working with others and his worst moments [[ChronicBackstabbingDisorder when he goes behind their backs and undermines their efforts due to his ego.]] Furthermore, despite the claims of him being the one who "makes the tough decisions", it consistently ignores how many of those decisions only come about as a result of his bad decisions in earlier volumes, and [[DirtyCoward how his actions basically involve running away from his mistakes]] when he finds that he is not able to resolve the matter by himself. Finally, despite the claims of Team RWBY and the heroes being naive idealists, they are the ones who have to cobble together a plan despite dealing with two separate factions bearing down on them, having to accept the loss of an entire nation to save as many people as possible, whereas Ironwood is consistently blocking them from executing these plans because he cannot accept the idea that the situation can be resolved without him being the most important figure involved, and that his "plan" was nothing more than a [[KillThePoor form of genocide against Mantle's poor]], and in the longer term would have left Remnant defenseless against Salem. The backlash was so strong that the writers pointed out that Ironwood had been portrayed as a deeply flawed individual from the beginning, and that he was meant to be regarded as unambiguously villainous by the end of Volume 7.

to:

** Ironwood has a devoted fanbase who see him as a strong military leader who can make the tough choices when his allies cannot, and who dislike the protagonists as naïve heroes endangering lives with their idealism. They feel Volumes 7-8 portrayed Ironwood as being the only person with a plan to save some lives in contrast to Team RWBY, who wanted to endanger everyone's lives due to having no plan to save anyone and no will to make the tough call to guarantee the salvation of some. They therefore believe that Ironwood was derailed into the role of a ruthless, impotent villain in favour of ProtagonistCenteredMorality. All of the above completely ignores that Ironwood has been a consistently incompetent military leader, with his best moments usually only when working with others and his worst moments [[ChronicBackstabbingDisorder when he goes behind their backs and undermines their efforts due to his ego.]] Furthermore, despite the claims of him being the one who "makes the tough decisions", it consistently ignores how many of those decisions only come about as a result of his bad decisions in earlier volumes, and [[DirtyCoward how his actions basically involve running away from his mistakes]] when he finds that he is not able to resolve the matter by himself. Finally, despite the claims of Team RWBY and the heroes being naive idealists, they are the ones who have to cobble together a plan despite dealing with two separate factions bearing down on them, having to accept the loss of an entire nation to save as many people as possible, whereas Ironwood is consistently blocking them from executing these plans [[ItsAllAboutMe because he cannot accept the idea that the situation can be resolved without him being the most important figure involved, involved]], and that his "plan" was nothing more than a [[KillThePoor form of genocide against Mantle's poor]], and in the longer term would have left Remnant defenseless against Salem. The backlash was so strong that the writers pointed out that Ironwood had been portrayed as a deeply flawed individual from the beginning, and that he was meant to be regarded as unambiguously villainous by the end of Volume 7.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Ironwood has a devoted fanbase who see him as a strong military leader who can make the tough choices when his allies cannot, and who dislike the protagonists as naïve heroes endangering lives with their idealism. They feel Volumes 7-8 portrayed Ironwood as being the only person with a plan to save some lives in contrast to Team RWBY, who wanted to endanger everyone's lives due to having no plan to save anyone and no will to make the tough call to guarantee the salvation of some. They therefore believe that Ironwood was derailed into the role of a ruthless, impotent villain in favour of ProtagonistCentredMorality. The backlash was so strong that the writers pointed out that Ironwood had been portrayed as a deeply flawed individual from the beginning, and that he was meant to be regarded as unambiguously villainous by the end of Volume 7.

to:

** Ironwood has a devoted fanbase who see him as a strong military leader who can make the tough choices when his allies cannot, and who dislike the protagonists as naïve heroes endangering lives with their idealism. They feel Volumes 7-8 portrayed Ironwood as being the only person with a plan to save some lives in contrast to Team RWBY, who wanted to endanger everyone's lives due to having no plan to save anyone and no will to make the tough call to guarantee the salvation of some. They therefore believe that Ironwood was derailed into the role of a ruthless, impotent villain in favour of ProtagonistCentredMorality.ProtagonistCenteredMorality. All of the above completely ignores that Ironwood has been a consistently incompetent military leader, with his best moments usually only when working with others and his worst moments [[ChronicBackstabbingDisorder when he goes behind their backs and undermines their efforts due to his ego.]] Furthermore, despite the claims of him being the one who "makes the tough decisions", it consistently ignores how many of those decisions only come about as a result of his bad decisions in earlier volumes, and [[DirtyCoward how his actions basically involve running away from his mistakes]] when he finds that he is not able to resolve the matter by himself. Finally, despite the claims of Team RWBY and the heroes being naive idealists, they are the ones who have to cobble together a plan despite dealing with two separate factions bearing down on them, having to accept the loss of an entire nation to save as many people as possible, whereas Ironwood is consistently blocking them from executing these plans because he cannot accept the idea that the situation can be resolved without him being the most important figure involved, and that his "plan" was nothing more than a [[KillThePoor form of genocide against Mantle's poor]], and in the longer term would have left Remnant defenseless against Salem. The backlash was so strong that the writers pointed out that Ironwood had been portrayed as a deeply flawed individual from the beginning, and that he was meant to be regarded as unambiguously villainous by the end of Volume 7.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Website/UrbanDictionary was created as a site where people can make their own slang words with their definitions, and also for other people to find out what (a) certain slang word(s) mean. However, a lot of people simply use it as a vehicle for their (biased) opinions. It's prevalent enough that the site's most popular entry for "Urban Dictionary" (which is also Website/UrbanDictionary page's quote) [[LampshadeHanging acknowledges]] this.

to:

* Website/UrbanDictionary was created as a site where people can make their own slang words with their definitions, and also for other people to find out what (a) certain slang word(s) mean. However, a lot of people simply use it as a vehicle for their (biased) opinions. It's prevalent enough that the site's most popular entry for "Urban Dictionary" (which is also Website/UrbanDictionary page's quote) [[LampshadeHanging acknowledges]] this.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Website/TheOnion'' parodies this with the article [[https://local.theonion.com/man-wearing-cobra-command-shirt-missed-the-whole-point-1834243488 Man Wearing Cobra Command Shirt Missed The Whole Point Of ‘G.I. Joe’]]. A man comes to work wearing a [[Franchise/GiJoe Cobra]] shirt and all of his coworkers freak out, seeing him as having "missed the point" of GI Joe and how the shirt means that he implicitly endorses a fictional snake themed terrorist organization.

to:

* ''Website/TheOnion'' parodies this with the article [[https://local.theonion.com/man-wearing-cobra-command-shirt-missed-the-whole-point-1834243488 Man Wearing Cobra Command Shirt Missed The Whole Point Of ‘G.I. Joe’]]. A man comes to work wearing a [[Franchise/GiJoe Cobra]] shirt and all of his coworkers freak out, seeing him as having "missed the point" of GI Joe ''Franchise/GIJoe'' and how the shirt means that he implicitly endorses a fictional snake themed terrorist organization.



* ''The Hard Times'' parodies the specific example of cops lionizing ComicBook/ThePunisher in this fashion [[https://thehardtimes.net/culture/man-shocked-meathead-cop-with-punisher-tattoo-doesnt-read-the-comic-books/ here]].

to:

* ''The Hard Times'' ''Website/TheHardTimes'' parodies the specific example of cops lionizing ComicBook/ThePunisher in this fashion in the article [[https://thehardtimes.net/culture/man-shocked-meathead-cop-with-punisher-tattoo-doesnt-read-the-comic-books/ here]]."Man Shocked Meathead Cop With Punisher Tattoo Doesn't Read The Comic Books".]] The cop is too stupid to care about the source material, the guy who points it out is more conerned with the cop not "getting it" than the fact that he was being assaulted, and the union chief justified his ignorance on the grounds that the meatheads under her can't read and that the Punisher's initial villainous portrayal perfectly described them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The ''WebVideo/FilthyFrank'' video "Weeaboos" satirized people who are obsessed with anime and Japanese culture, and think that they can learn everything they need to know about Japan through anime. Many Filthy Frank fans believed he hated such people, calling everybody who demonstrates even a slight interest in anime and/or Japan out as a "weeaboo". This is despite Frank saying at the beginning of the video that he's got nothing against anime or people who watch it, and also has nothing against Japan as a country.

to:

* The ''WebVideo/FilthyFrank'' video "Weeaboos" satirized people who are obsessed with anime and Japanese culture, and think that they can learn everything they need to know about Japan through anime. Many Filthy Frank fans believed he hated such people, calling everybody who demonstrates even a slight interest in anime and/or Japan out as a "weeaboo". This is despite Frank saying at the beginning of the video that he's got nothing against anime or people who watch it, and also has nothing against Japan as a country. actually being born in Osaka himself.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


** As Rolfe's page on Wiki/TheOtherWiki notes, the original joke of the Angry Video Game Nerd character was that it was absurd ''at the time'' for a grown man to get [[SeriousBusiness so mad]] about video games. Ten years on, it's common to see ordinary forum posters with AVGN levels of rage, partly because the character's influence ended up making disproportionate rage about games a normal part of gamer culture.

to:

** As Rolfe's page on Wiki/TheOtherWiki Website/TheOtherWiki notes, the original joke of the Angry Video Game Nerd character was that it was absurd ''at the time'' for a grown man to get [[SeriousBusiness so mad]] about video games. Ten years on, it's common to see ordinary forum posters with AVGN levels of rage, partly because the character's influence ended up making disproportionate rage about games a normal part of gamer culture.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Kevin Temmer's [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8FA25a22dQ "Delete This Tweet"]] animation, a music video starring a boy band called the "Trash Binz" singing to the viewer about how they should perform the titular action, has been used by people on websites like Twitter as a response to arguments they disagree with… except that the video itself ''mocks'' this kind of mentality, and not even subtly. Putting aside the fact that the Trash Binz themselves are literally ''[[VisualPun anthropomorphic trash cans]]'', they're visually emphasized midway through the video as being [[CondescendingCompassion condescending]] [[HypocriticalHumor hypocrites]] who gorge on the prospects of gatekeeping people, [[TheGadfly stirring up drama for the sake of it]], or basking in the popular opinions of [[ConvictedByPublicOpinion the mob]] or an influential figure, and thus aren't liable to be any better than the party they're accusing. Despite its unironic use in some circles, it's clear that the video's ''actual'' message is that those who insist others backslide on their opinions so adamantly are liable to be, well, [[{{Pun}} trashy]].

to:

* Kevin Temmer's [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8FA25a22dQ "Delete This Tweet"]] animation, a music video starring a boy band called the "Trash Binz" singing to the viewer about how they should perform the titular action, has been used by people on websites like Twitter as a response to arguments they disagree with… except that the video itself ''mocks'' this kind of mentality, and not even subtly. Putting aside the fact that the Trash Binz themselves are literally ''[[VisualPun anthropomorphic trash cans]]'', they're visually emphasized midway through the video as being [[CondescendingCompassion condescending]] [[HypocriticalHumor hypocrites]] who gorge on the prospects of gatekeeping people, [[TheGadfly stirring up drama for the sake of it]], or basking in the popular opinions of [[ConvictedByPublicOpinion the mob]] or an influential figure, and thus aren't liable to be any better than the party they're accusing. [[PoesLaw Despite its unironic use in some circles, circles]], it's clear that the video's ''actual'' message is that those who insist others backslide on their opinions so adamantly are liable to be, well, [[{{Pun}} trashy]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Someone had to do it.

Added DiffLines:

* Kevin Temmer's [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8FA25a22dQ "Delete This Tweet"]] animation, a music video starring a boy band called the "Trash Binz" singing to the viewer about how they should perform the titular action, has been used by people on websites like Twitter as a response to arguments they disagree with… except that the video itself ''mocks'' this kind of mentality, and not even subtly. Putting aside the fact that the Trash Binz themselves are literally ''[[VisualPun anthropomorphic trash cans]]'', they're visually emphasized midway through the video as being [[CondescendingCompassion condescending]] [[HypocriticalHumor hypocrites]] who gorge on the prospects of gatekeeping people, [[TheGadfly stirring up drama for the sake of it]], or basking in the popular opinions of [[ConvictedByPublicOpinion the mob]] or an influential figure, and thus aren't liable to be any better than the party they're accusing. Despite its unironic use in some circles, it's clear that the video's ''actual'' message is that those who insist others backslide on their opinions so adamantly are liable to be, well, [[{{Pun}} trashy]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The "WebOriginal/VirginVsChad" memes. Originally, it was a RightWayWrongWayPair spoof that compared a "Virgin" doing normal things like listening to music while walking or trying to avoid bumping into anyone to a "Chad" who inverted whatever the Virgin was doing, such as never having listened to music or deliberately knocking people out of one's way. Basically, the intent was to make the viewer feel insecure about a normal thing. Most Virgin vs. Chad memes disregard this and just make it a plain "bad vs. good" meme where the Virgin is something they don't like and the Chad is something they like.

to:

* The "WebOriginal/VirginVsChad" memes. Originally, it was a RightWayWrongWayPair spoof that compared a "Virgin" doing normal things like listening to music while walking or trying to avoid bumping into anyone to a "Chad" who inverted whatever the Virgin was doing, such as never having listened to music or deliberately knocking people out of one's way. Basically, The Chad's side was a parody response to the intent Virgin's side, which was initially written to make the viewer feel insecure about a mock "loser behavior" but came off as making fun of normal thing.reactions. Most Virgin vs. Chad memes disregard this and just make it a plain "bad vs. good" meme where the Virgin is something they don't like and the Chad is something they like.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The ''Machinima/TeamServiceAnnouncement'' series was meant to give inexperienced VideoGame/TeamFortress2 players advice on common situations. As such, the fact that people watch them mainly for entertainment has caused some CreatorBacklash.

to:

* The ''Machinima/TeamServiceAnnouncement'' ''WebAnimation/TeamServiceAnnouncement'' series was meant to give inexperienced VideoGame/TeamFortress2 players advice on common situations. As such, the fact that people watch them mainly for entertainment has caused some CreatorBacklash.

Changed: 1874

Removed: 624

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



* ''WebVideo/CriticalRole'' brought about a ''large'' NewbieBoom in ''TabletopGame/DungeonsAndDragons'' - and with it? The dreaded [[https://screenrant.com/critical-role-dnd-mercer-effect-dungeons-dragons-expectations/ Mercer Effect]]:
** Many a GameMaster found themselves assembled with a table of fresh players only to find that they either won't stop talking about ''Critical Role'' all the time, copy character beats from ''Critical Role'', or constantly say "That's not how Matt Mercer does it!". Or a fresh player joins a table only to find [[HypeBacklash the GM is nothing like Matt Mercer and the rest o of the players are nothing like Bailey, Willingham, O'Brien, Ray, Jaffe, Johnson, or Riegal]]. Not knowing that those people happen to be experienced actors and have played tabletop [=RPGs=] for years.
** Others take Matt Mercer's "DM advice" videos as the actual rulebooks and refuse to deviate - when one of the ''entire points'' of a Tabletop game is that you can actually pick and choose what rules and make your own. The rules are largely a guideline - just as Mercer's advice is largely for you to get ideas on how to think and ultimately come to your own conclusion.
** A lot of newcomers have also assumed that the campaign is largely scripted - when it's not. Mercer has even stated that a lot of his sessions are improvised.
** The Misaimed Fandom has become so strong that even Mercer himself has spoken against this.

to:

\n* ''WebVideo/CriticalRole'' brought about a ''large'' large NewbieBoom in to ''TabletopGame/DungeonsAndDragons'' - and with it? The dreaded it, the [[https://screenrant.com/critical-role-dnd-mercer-effect-dungeons-dragons-expectations/ Mercer Effect]]:
Effect]], where the fans of ''Critical Role'' expect every game of ''D&D'' to be like what's presented in the show.
** Many a GameMaster found themselves assembled with a table of fresh players players. only to find that they either won't stop talking about ''Critical Role'' all the time, Role'', copy character beats from ''Critical Role'', or constantly say "That's not how Matt Mercer does it!". it!" to the exasperated DM. Or a fresh player joins a table only to find [[HypeBacklash the GM is nothing like Matt Mercer and the rest o of the players are nothing like Bailey, Willingham, O'Brien, Ray, Jaffe, Johnson, or Riegal]]. the core cast members]]. Not knowing that those people happen to be experienced only have all of the show's actors and have played tabletop [=RPGs=] for years.
years, but they're also actors who have been trained to get into character and emote properly, which is hard to find in the wild.
** Others take Matt Mercer's "DM advice" videos as the actual rulebooks and refuse to deviate - when one deviate. One of the ''entire points'' of a Tabletop tabletop game is that [[RuleZero you can actually pick and choose what rules and make your own. own]]. The rules are largely a guideline - just as Mercer's advice is largely for you to get ideas on how to think and ultimately come to your own conclusion.
** A lot of newcomers have also assumed that the campaign is largely scripted - when it's not. Mercer has even stated that a lot of his sessions are improvised.
** The Misaimed Fandom has become so strong that even Mercer himself has spoken against this.
conclusion.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Trollface. The meme originated from a [[http://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/7/73/Trollface.png comic]] lampooning Internet trolls, but the face was so awesome that the very same trolls had no problem making it the most recognizable icon of "the lulz" this side of [[http://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/1/13/Awesome.png Awesome itself]].

to:

* Trollface. The Trollface meme originated from a [[http://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/7/73/Trollface.png [[https://web.archive.org/web/20200220030016/https://www.deviantart.com/whynne/art/Comic-Trolls-98357844 comic]] lampooning Internet trolls, but the face was so awesome trolls. The comic says that the very same trolls had no problem making it want to believe that they're driving people insane with rage, when they're being met with mild annoyance at worst. It also suggests that [[ParodyRetcon someone is only claiming to troll after their real opinions are seen as stupid]]. That hasn't stopped people from using the most recognizable icon Trollface to represent actual trolling, in spite of "the lulz" this side of [[http://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/1/13/Awesome.png Awesome itself]].the face's origins.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Up To Eleven is a defunct trope


** He hates [[PlatformHell Super Mario World ROM hacks that abuse the use of invisible coin blocks]] and in response to the hacks that kept doing that, he made his own level that had [[TurnedUpToEleven over 200 invisible coin blocks]] in a platform like maze with a switch at the very top that reveals the level exit. He sent the level to some of his friends and one of them thought the level was just brilliant, causing Proton Jon to exclaim "No, you idiot! You're missing the point!"

to:

** He hates [[PlatformHell Super Mario World ROM hacks that abuse the use of invisible coin blocks]] and in response to the hacks that kept doing that, he made his own level that had [[TurnedUpToEleven over 200 invisible coin blocks]] blocks in a platform like maze with a switch at the very top that reveals the level exit. He sent the level to some of his friends and one of them thought the level was just brilliant, causing Proton Jon to exclaim "No, you idiot! You're missing the point!"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Webcomic/TheOatmeal'': [[https://theoatmeal.com/comics/literally "What it means when you say 'literally'"]] features a quote from anti-gay televangelist Jerry Falwell, in which he claims that a "homosexual steamroller will literally crush all decent men, women, and children who get in its way" as an example of the word "literally" being misused. The point is illustrated with a cartoon of people being run over by a pink-and-rainbow "Gayroller 2000". Although the point of this was to mock homophobes, some the image has since been appropriated and used unironically in anti-LGBTQ memes. [[https://twitter.com/oatmeal/status/614481505704931328 The Oatmeal later made a tweet]] clarifying that the image is meant to be pro-marriage equality, in response to a right-wing publication posting an image of a giant rainbow steamroller destroying small businesses.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Creepypasta}} characters Jeff The Killer And [[Franchise/TheSlenderManMythos Slenderman.]] Full stop. One can sort of understand Jeff being a DracoInLeatherPants (since he had his psychological break due to extreme bullying, and the disfigurement he suffered as a result of said bullying), but SLENDERMAN?!

to:

* {{Creepypasta}} characters Jeff The Killer And [[Franchise/TheSlenderManMythos Slenderman.]] Full stop.Slenderman]] are strange examples. One can sort of understand Jeff being a DracoInLeatherPants (since he had his psychological break due to extreme bullying, and the disfigurement he suffered as a result of said bullying), but SLENDERMAN?!



* ''WebAnimation/UnbiasedHistory'': The series enjoyed brief popularity among antisemites and white nationalists, most notably for the Hadrian [[FinalSolution "IVDEA DELENDA EST"]] montage - despite the obviously parodic nature of the whole series. It's meant to depict an exaggerated version of the ancient Roman mindset (hence why the narrator flips from describing Christianity as a subversive force to spiritual truth within the span of one episode). Not only that, but the earlier episodes contain [[TakeThat outright insults]] towards /pol/ and antisemites more generally, which makes it weird that it got popular on /pol/ for a while.

to:

* ''WebAnimation/UnbiasedHistory'': The series enjoyed brief popularity among antisemites and white nationalists, most notably for the Hadrian [[FinalSolution "IVDEA DELENDA EST"]] montage - montage, despite the obviously parodic nature of the whole series. It's meant to depict an exaggerated version of the ancient Roman mindset (hence why the narrator flips from describing Christianity UsefulNotes/{{Christianity}} as a subversive force to spiritual truth within the span of one episode). Not only that, but the earlier episodes contain [[TakeThat outright insults]] towards /pol/ [[Website/FourChan /pol/]] and antisemites more generally, which makes it weird that it got popular on /pol/ for a while.

Added: 1202

Changed: 235

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* ''WebVideo/CriticalRole'' brought about a ''large'' NewbieBoom in ''TabletopGame/DungeonsAndDragons'' - and with it? The dreaded [[https://screenrant.com/critical-role-dnd-mercer-effect-dungeons-dragons-expectations/ Mercer Effect]]:
** Many a GameMaster found themselves assembled with a table of fresh players only to find that they either won't stop talking about ''Critical Role'' all the time, copy character beats from ''Critical Role'', or constantly say "That's not how Matt Mercer does it!". Or a fresh player joins a table only to find [[HypeBacklash the GM is nothing like Matt Mercer and the rest o of the players are nothing like Bailey, Willingham, O'Brien, Ray, Jaffe, Johnson, or Riegal]]. Not knowing that those people happen to be experienced actors and have played tabletop [=RPGs=] for years.
** Others take Matt Mercer's "DM advice" videos as the actual rulebooks and refuse to deviate - when one of the ''entire points'' of a Tabletop game is that you can actually pick and choose what rules and make your own. The rules are largely a guideline - just as Mercer's advice is largely for you to get ideas on how to think and ultimately come to your own conclusion.
** A lot of newcomers have also assumed that the campaign is largely scripted - when it's not. Mercer has even stated that a lot of his sessions are improvised.
** The Misaimed Fandom has become so strong that even Mercer himself has spoken against this.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Richard, the undead warlock of ''Webcomic/LookingForGroup'', does nothing so much as [[CrossesTheLineTwice play jump rope with the line]]. He has [[RefugeInAudacity an entire summer home in audacity]]. About the only time we ever see him is when he's [[OmnicidalManiac killing stuff for the hell of it]] or [[DeadpanSnarker making kinda Vincenty Price-y jokes]]. And "stuff" in this context means, well, you name it. Women, children, innocent bystanders, orphanages, whatever. It was well into the story before there was even a hint that he had ''any'' purpose or role other than as super-dark comic relief, or any redeeming qualities at all. Go on and guess which character seems to be by far the fandom favorite. Saying things like "I don't like to see evil characters get away with the things Richard gets away with" on the forums isn't ''quite'' going to get anyone flamed, but expect plenty of people to leap to defense of their favorite comic mass murderer. There are both FoeYay and heroics in the strip revolving around Richard, especially in the more recent installments of the comic, so it's unclear if the character has a genuinely misguided fandom, or if he is being evolved in the comic progression, or if one has led to the other or vice-versa.

to:

* Richard, the undead warlock of ''Webcomic/LookingForGroup'', does nothing so much as [[CrossesTheLineTwice play jump rope with the line]]. He has [[RefugeInAudacity an entire summer home in audacity]]. About the only time we ever see him is when he's [[OmnicidalManiac killing stuff for the hell of it]] or [[DeadpanSnarker making kinda Vincenty Price-y jokes]]. And "stuff" in this context means, well, you name it. Women, children, innocent bystanders, orphanages, whatever. It was well into the story before there was even a hint that he had ''any'' purpose or role other than as super-dark comic relief, or any redeeming qualities at all. Go on and guess which character seems to be by far the fandom favorite. Saying things like "I don't like to see evil characters get away with the things Richard gets away with" on the forums isn't ''quite'' going to get anyone flamed, but expect plenty of people to leap to defense of their favorite comic mass murderer. There are both FoeYay and heroics in the strip revolving around Richard, especially in the more recent installments of the comic, so it's unclear if the character has a genuinely misguided fandom, or if he is being evolved in the comic progression, or if one has led to the other or vice-versa.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''WebAnimation/UnbiasedHistory'': The series enjoyed brief popularity among antisemites and white nationalists, most notably for the Hadrian [[FinalSolution "IVDEA DELENDA EST"]] montage - despite the obviously parodic nature of the whole series. It's meant to depict an exaggerated version of the ancient Roman mindset (hence why the narrator flips from describing Christianity as a subversive force to spiritual truth within the span of one episode). Not only that, but the earlier episodes contain [[TakeThat outright insults]] towards /pol/ and antisemites more generally, which makes it weird that it got popular on /pol/ for a while.

Top