Follow TV Tropes

Following

History MediaNotes / BinaryPrefix

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Operating systems, given the UsefulNotes/BinaryBitsAndBytes nature of computers, measure this in powers of 2^10. So a kilobyte is 2^10, a megabyte is 2^20, a gigabyte 2^30, and so on. Turns out there are more bytes in a given order of magnitude than the SI method.

to:

Operating systems, given the UsefulNotes/BinaryBitsAndBytes MediaNotes/BinaryBitsAndBytes nature of computers, measure this in powers of 2^10. So a kilobyte is 2^10, a megabyte is 2^20, a gigabyte 2^30, and so on. Turns out there are more bytes in a given order of magnitude than the SI method.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Page was movedfrom MediaNotes.Binary Prefix Mover to MediaNotes.Binary Prefix. Null edit to update page.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Page was movedfrom UsefulNotes.Binary Prefix to MediaNotes.Binary Prefix Mover. Null edit to update page.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Editing to avoid falling into Technology Marches On


You bring home a brand new 1 terabyte hard drive to store your massive collection of whatever it is (Games, pictures, music, [[BreadEggsMilkSquick porn]]). After getting it up and running, formatting it, etc. you find out that your OS reports only 909 gigabytes. Wait, did the hard drive manufacturers shortchange you out of some 90 gigabytes of capacity? Did formatting really eat up all that space? Nope, it turns out this is a problem with what hard drive manufacturers say is a kilobyte, megabyte, gigabyte, etc. and what operating systems say, creating UnitConfusion. Both are, for all intents and purposes, correct, just measured on different scales.

to:

You bring home a brand new 1 terabyte hard storage drive to store your massive collection of whatever it is (Games, pictures, music, [[BreadEggsMilkSquick porn]]). After getting it up and running, formatting it, etc. you find out that your OS reports only 909 gigabytes. Wait, did the hard drive manufacturers shortchange you out of some 90 gigabytes of capacity? Did formatting really eat up all that space? Nope, it turns out this is a problem with what hard drive manufacturers say is a kilobyte, megabyte, gigabyte, etc. and what operating systems say, creating UnitConfusion. Both are, for all intents and purposes, correct, just measured on different scales.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Operating systems, given the BinaryBitsAndBytes nature of computers, measure this in powers of 2^10. So a kilobyte is 2^10, a megabyte is 2^20, a gigabyte 2^30, and so on. Turns out there are more bytes in a given order of magnitude than the SI method.

to:

Operating systems, given the BinaryBitsAndBytes UsefulNotes/BinaryBitsAndBytes nature of computers, measure this in powers of 2^10. So a kilobyte is 2^10, a megabyte is 2^20, a gigabyte 2^30, and so on. Turns out there are more bytes in a given order of magnitude than the SI method.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Image spacing


[[quoteright:577: [[{{Webcomic/Xkcd}} http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/351ff28599247e49b31efdeadf9e9473.png]]]]

to:

[[quoteright:577: [[quoteright:350: [[{{Webcomic/Xkcd}} http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/351ff28599247e49b31efdeadf9e9473.png]]]]

Changed: 1946

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


You bring home a brand new 1 terabyte hard drive to store your massive collection of whatever it is (Games, pictures, music, [[BreadEggsMilkSquick porn]]). After getting it up and running, formatting it, etc. you find out that your OS reports only 909 gigabytes. Wait, did the hard drive manufacturers shortchange you out of some 90 gigabytes of capacity? Did formatting really eat up all that space? Nope, it turns out this is a problem with what hard drive manufacturers say is a kilobyte, megabyte, gigabyte, etc. and what operating systems say, creating UnitConfusion. Both are, for all intents and purposes, correct, just measured on different scales.

Hard drive manufacturers (and in fact, most memory manufacturers... except those that make RAM) say a kilobyte is 1,000 bytes, a megabyte 1,000,000 bytes, a gigabyte 1,000,000,000 bytes and so on. This is following the normal SI standard of naming quantities.

to:

[[quoteright:577: [[{{Webcomic/Xkcd}} http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/351ff28599247e49b31efdeadf9e9473.png]]]]
You bring home a brand new 1 terabyte hard drive to store your massive collection of whatever it is (Games, pictures, music, [[BreadEggsMilkSquick porn]]). After getting it up and running, formatting it, etc. you find out that your OS reports only 909 gigabytes. Wait, did the hard drive manufacturers shortchange you out of some 90 gigabytes of capacity? Did formatting really eat up all that space? Nope, it turns out this is a problem with what hard drive manufacturers say is a kilobyte, megabyte, gigabyte, etc. and what operating systems say, creating UnitConfusion. Both are, for all intents and purposes, correct, just measured on different scales.

Hard drive manufacturers (and in fact, most Most memory manufacturers... manufacturers, except those that make RAM) RAM, say a kilobyte is 1,000 bytes, a megabyte 1,000,000 bytes, a gigabyte 1,000,000,000 bytes and so on. This is following the normal SI standard of naming quantities.



It wasn't until 1998that the convention of how operating system of measures memory became standardized by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), being called binary prefixes. It's the same as the SI prefix, but just replace the last two letters with "bi". Kilobyte becomes kibibyte, megabyte becomes mebibyte, [[OverlyLongGag and so on]]. But to make things worse, either way of naming is ''valid''. So while a gibibyte is without a doubt 2^30 bytes, a gigabyte could still be 1,000,000,000 bytes or 2^30 bytes.

Most operating systems still use binary prefixes. Mac OS X started using the SI method with Snow Leopard. Ubuntu Linux also started using the SI method.

to:

It wasn't until 1998that 1998 that the convention of how operating system of measures memory became standardized by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), being called binary prefixes. It's the same as the SI prefix, but just replace the last two letters with "bi". Kilobyte becomes kibibyte, megabyte becomes mebibyte, [[OverlyLongGag and so on]]. But to make things worse, either way of naming is ''valid''. So while a gibibyte is without a doubt 2^30 bytes, a gigabyte could still be 1,000,000,000 bytes or 2^30 bytes.

Most operating systems still use binary prefixes. Mac OS X started using the SI method with Snow Leopard. and Ubuntu Linux also started using use the SI method.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Typo fix


Hard drive manufacturers (and in fact, most memory manufacturers... except those that make RAM) say a kilobyte is 1,000 bytes, a megabyte 1,000,00 bytes, a gigabyte 1,000,000,000 bytes and so on. This is following the normal SI standard of naming quantities.

to:

Hard drive manufacturers (and in fact, most memory manufacturers... except those that make RAM) say a kilobyte is 1,000 bytes, a megabyte 1,000,00 1,000,000 bytes, a gigabyte 1,000,000,000 bytes and so on. This is following the normal SI standard of naming quantities.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


It wasn't until recently that the convention of how operating system of measures memory became standardized, being called binary prefixes. It's the same as the SI prefix, but just replace the last two letters with "bi". Kilobyte becomes kibibyte, megabyte becomes mebibyte, [[OverlyLongGag and so on]]. But to make things worse, either way of naming is ''valid''. So while a gibibyte is without a doubt 2^30 bytes, a gigabyte could still be 1,000,000,000 bytes or 2^30 bytes.

to:

It wasn't until recently that 1998that the convention of how operating system of measures memory became standardized, standardized by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), being called binary prefixes. It's the same as the SI prefix, but just replace the last two letters with "bi". Kilobyte becomes kibibyte, megabyte becomes mebibyte, [[OverlyLongGag and so on]]. But to make things worse, either way of naming is ''valid''. So while a gibibyte is without a doubt 2^30 bytes, a gigabyte could still be 1,000,000,000 bytes or 2^30 bytes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
rm apostrophe


You bring home a brand new 1 terabyte hard drive to store your massive collection of whatever it is (Games, pictures, music, [[BreadEggsMilkSquick porn]]). After getting it up and running, formatting it, etc. you find out that your OS reports only 909 gigabytes. Wait, did the hard drive manufacturers shortchange you out of some 90 gigabytes of capacity? Did formatting really eat up all that space? Nope, it turns out this is a problem with what hard drive manufacturer's say is a kilobyte, megabyte, gigabyte, etc. and what operating systems say, creating UnitConfusion. Both are, for all intents and purposes, correct, just measured on different scales.

to:

You bring home a brand new 1 terabyte hard drive to store your massive collection of whatever it is (Games, pictures, music, [[BreadEggsMilkSquick porn]]). After getting it up and running, formatting it, etc. you find out that your OS reports only 909 gigabytes. Wait, did the hard drive manufacturers shortchange you out of some 90 gigabytes of capacity? Did formatting really eat up all that space? Nope, it turns out this is a problem with what hard drive manufacturer's manufacturers say is a kilobyte, megabyte, gigabyte, etc. and what operating systems say, creating UnitConfusion. Both are, for all intents and purposes, correct, just measured on different scales.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Note that transfer speeds traditionally use SI prefixes. But they also note the speed in bits, not bytes.

to:

Note that transfer network based speeds traditionally use may be displayed using SI prefixes. But they prefixes while also note using bits per second, not bytes per second. File transfers are usually reported with how the speed in bits, not bytes.OS reports sizes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
transfer speeds

Added DiffLines:


Note that transfer speeds traditionally use SI prefixes. But they also note the speed in bits, not bytes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

You bring home a brand new 1 terabyte hard drive to store your massive collection of whatever it is (Games, pictures, music, [[BreadEggsMilkSquick porn]]). After getting it up and running, formatting it, etc. you find out that your OS reports only 909 gigabytes. Wait, did the hard drive manufacturers shortchange you out of some 90 gigabytes of capacity? Did formatting really eat up all that space? Nope, it turns out this is a problem with what hard drive manufacturer's say is a kilobyte, megabyte, gigabyte, etc. and what operating systems say, creating UnitConfusion. Both are, for all intents and purposes, correct, just measured on different scales.

Hard drive manufacturers (and in fact, most memory manufacturers... except those that make RAM) say a kilobyte is 1,000 bytes, a megabyte 1,000,00 bytes, a gigabyte 1,000,000,000 bytes and so on. This is following the normal SI standard of naming quantities.

Operating systems, given the BinaryBitsAndBytes nature of computers, measure this in powers of 2^10. So a kilobyte is 2^10, a megabyte is 2^20, a gigabyte 2^30, and so on. Turns out there are more bytes in a given order of magnitude than the SI method.

It wasn't until recently that the convention of how operating system of measures memory became standardized, being called binary prefixes. It's the same as the SI prefix, but just replace the last two letters with "bi". Kilobyte becomes kibibyte, megabyte becomes mebibyte, [[OverlyLongGag and so on]]. But to make things worse, either way of naming is ''valid''. So while a gibibyte is without a doubt 2^30 bytes, a gigabyte could still be 1,000,000,000 bytes or 2^30 bytes.

Most operating systems still use binary prefixes. Mac OS X started using the SI method with Snow Leopard. Ubuntu Linux also started using the SI method.
----

Top