History Main / WordSaladPhilosophy

2nd Nov '17 12:39:39 PM snichols1973
Is there an issue? Send a Message


-->'''Paul''' {singing to himself]: Einstein, Einstein, any any any old Einstein...

to:

-->'''Paul''' {singing [singing to himself]: Einstein, Einstein, any any any old Einstein...
2nd Nov '17 10:25:41 AM snichols1973
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

** When they first encounter Jeremy Hillary Boob, Ph.D.:
-->'''Jeremy''': I must complete my bust, two novels, finish my blueprints, begin my beguine...
-->'''John''': Must you always talk in rhyme?
-->'''Jeremy''': If I spoke prose you'd all find out, I don't know what I talk about.
** And in the Sea of Time:
-->'''George''': Maybe time's gone on strike.
-->'''Ringo''': What for?
-->'''George''': Shorter hours.
-->'''Ringo''': I don't blame it. Must be very tiring being time, mustn't it?
-->'''John''', '''Paul''', '''George''': Why?
-->'''Ringo''': Well, it's a twenty four hour day, isn't it?
-->'''John''': You surprise me, Ringo.
-->'''Ringo''': Why?
-->'''John''': Dealing in abstracts.
2nd Nov '17 10:01:50 AM snichols1973
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* WseternAnimation/YellowSubmarine has instances like these:

to:

* WseternAnimation/YellowSubmarine WesternAnimation/YellowSubmarine has instances like these:



-->'''George''': How do we break them out?

to:

-->'''George''': How do we break get them out?out?
-->'''John''': Break the glass.
2nd Nov '17 9:59:56 AM snichols1973
Is there an issue? Send a Message


[[folder:Film]]

to:

[[folder:Film]][[folder:Films - Live Action]]


Added DiffLines:

[[folder: Films - Animated]]
* WseternAnimation/YellowSubmarine has instances like these:
-->'''John''': If I could come in, here, I think the theory put forward by Einstein...
-->'''Paul''' {singing to himself]: Einstein, Einstein, any any any old Einstein...
-->'''John''': ...could well be applied here. The people in the ball are obviously extensions of our own personalities, suspended, as it were, in time, frozen in space.
-->'''George''': Uh, John?
-->'''John''': ...according to the now-famous theory of relativity...
-->'''George''': John?
-->'''John''': ...which, briefly explained...
-->'''George''': John...
-->'''John''': ...is simply a matter of taking two eggs...
-->'''George''': John...
-->'''John''': ...beating lightly, and adding a little salt and pepper to taste.
-->'''George''': John!
-->'''John''': George?
-->'''George''': How do we break them out?
[[/folder]]
29th Oct '17 11:21:20 PM nm3youtube
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

*In late October 2017, a [=UFOlogist=] posted [[https://twitter.com/Techmoan/status/924595112730079233 this indecipherable gibberish]] under [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qi4nR87iNDg a video about setting up a cheap home security system]]. The uploader, Techmoan, described it as "the oddest comment [he'd] received in a while", and all that can be gleamed from it is that the bloke has been looking at every security camera video ever looking for evidence of {{Flying Saucer}}s.
-->'''Jones Decor''': Some time ago i had a [[MushroomSamba herbal tab incident]]. It resulted in many [[Website/{{Twitter}} tweets]] and [[Website/{{Facebook}} FB]] posts being deleted the next day. I can feel his pain. [[MindScrew I think.]]
23rd Sep '17 3:41:46 PM Beedle
Is there an issue? Send a Message


->Music/{{REM}} "''Life and How to Live It''"

to:

->Music/{{REM}} -->--Music/{{REM}} "''Life and How to Live It''"
17th Sep '17 1:25:42 PM nombretomado
Is there an issue? Send a Message


-->''[[HowDoIUsedTense And should that surprised?]] [[SocialDarwinist The genetic continuity of one's group is a real life interest]], however humble, however unsexy, and the sense of moral superiority and temporary bit of status one is rewarded with for paying lip service to the faithism de jure is not.''

to:

-->''[[HowDoIUsedTense -->''[[UsefulNotes/HowDoIUsedTense And should that surprised?]] [[SocialDarwinist The genetic continuity of one's group is a real life interest]], however humble, however unsexy, and the sense of moral superiority and temporary bit of status one is rewarded with for paying lip service to the faithism de jure is not.''
30th Jul '17 9:05:47 AM VapourSoulOS
Is there an issue? Send a Message


--> Karjam: If you're an advocate for my philosophy on [[IceCreamKoan thoughts]], [[KnowNothingKnowItAll beliefs]], [[MarySue imagination]] and [[BelievingTheirOwnLies focus]], you may come across those who claim the philosophy being difficult or impossible to understand. [[BlatantLies Now, these people aren't saying this because it really is that difficult to understand.]] Far from it, actually. Rather, they're saying this because [[PsychologicalProjection they've rejected what should be obvious]]; they were trying to [[{{Hypocrite}}see meaning in what does not exist]], (In other words, [[BlameGame they're overthinking things.]])Such practices is usually a [[{{Hypocrite}} sign of a closed heart.]] Therefore, what out when it comes to dealing with them. How they react to being presented with sound, solid truths (which happen to be thoughts) depends on the nature of their [[YouKeepUsingThatWord closed hearts.]] The more closed their hearts are, the worst their reactions will be. As a quick note, simply stating that they're overthinking things (and explaining why they're doing it) [[BlatantLies is usually enough to counter such arguments.]] However, if they keep on insisting without providing sound, solid truths themselves (which happen to be thoughts),[[MoralMyopia what they're doing is arguing by assertion, a logical fallacy.]] In addition, do not give proofs and examples even when asked. Even if said proofs or examples happen to be completely solid and sound, that does not automatically mean those with the closed hearts would be convinced.

to:

--> Karjam: '''Karjam''': If you're an advocate for my philosophy on [[IceCreamKoan thoughts]], [[KnowNothingKnowItAll beliefs]], [[MarySue imagination]] and [[BelievingTheirOwnLies focus]], you may come across those who claim the philosophy being difficult or impossible to understand. [[BlatantLies Now, these people aren't saying this because it really is that difficult to understand.]] Far from it, actually. Rather, they're saying this because [[PsychologicalProjection they've rejected what should be obvious]]; they were trying to [[{{Hypocrite}}see meaning in what does not exist]], (In other words, [[BlameGame they're overthinking things.]])Such practices is usually a [[{{Hypocrite}} sign of a closed heart.]] Therefore, what out when it comes to dealing with them. How they react to being presented with sound, solid truths (which happen to be thoughts) depends on the nature of their [[YouKeepUsingThatWord closed hearts.]] The more closed their hearts are, the worst their reactions will be. As a quick note, simply stating that they're overthinking things (and explaining why they're doing it) [[BlatantLies is usually enough to counter such arguments.]] However, if they keep on insisting without providing sound, solid truths themselves (which happen to be thoughts),[[MoralMyopia what they're doing is arguing by assertion, a logical fallacy.]] In addition, do not give proofs and examples even when asked. Even if said proofs or examples happen to be completely solid and sound, that does not automatically mean those with the closed hearts would be convinced.
30th Jul '17 9:05:08 AM VapourSoulOS
Is there an issue? Send a Message


--> Karjam: If you're an advocate for my philosophy on [[IceCreamKoan thoughts]], [[KnowNothingKnowItAll beliefs]], [[MarySue imagination]] and [[BelievingTheirOwnLies focus]], you may come across those who claim the philosophy being difficult or impossible to understand. [[BlatantLies Now, these people aren't saying this because it really is that difficult to understand.]] Far from it, actually. Rather, they're saying this because [[PsychologicalProjection they've rejected what should be obvious]]; they were trying to [[{{Hypocrite}}see meaning in what does not exist]], (In other words, [[BlameGame they're overthinking things.]])Such practices is usually a [[ {{Hypocrite}} sign of a closed heart.]] Therefore, what out when it comes to dealing with them. How they react to being presented with sound, solid truths (which happen to be thoughts) depends on the nature of their [[YouKeepUsingThatWord closed hearts.]] The more closed their hearts are, the worst their reactions will be. As a quick note, simply stating that they're overthinking things (and explaining why they're doing it) [[BlatantLies is usually enough to counter such arguments.]] However, if they keep on insisting without providing sound, solid truths themselves (which happen to be thoughts),[[MoralMyopia what they're doing is arguing by assertion, a logical fallacy.]] In addition, do not give proofs and examples even when asked. Even if said proofs or examples happen to be completely solid and sound, that does not automatically mean those with the closed hearts would be convinced.

to:

--> Karjam: If you're an advocate for my philosophy on [[IceCreamKoan thoughts]], [[KnowNothingKnowItAll beliefs]], [[MarySue imagination]] and [[BelievingTheirOwnLies focus]], you may come across those who claim the philosophy being difficult or impossible to understand. [[BlatantLies Now, these people aren't saying this because it really is that difficult to understand.]] Far from it, actually. Rather, they're saying this because [[PsychologicalProjection they've rejected what should be obvious]]; they were trying to [[{{Hypocrite}}see meaning in what does not exist]], (In other words, [[BlameGame they're overthinking things.]])Such practices is usually a [[ {{Hypocrite}} [[{{Hypocrite}} sign of a closed heart.]] Therefore, what out when it comes to dealing with them. How they react to being presented with sound, solid truths (which happen to be thoughts) depends on the nature of their [[YouKeepUsingThatWord closed hearts.]] The more closed their hearts are, the worst their reactions will be. As a quick note, simply stating that they're overthinking things (and explaining why they're doing it) [[BlatantLies is usually enough to counter such arguments.]] However, if they keep on insisting without providing sound, solid truths themselves (which happen to be thoughts),[[MoralMyopia what they're doing is arguing by assertion, a logical fallacy.]] In addition, do not give proofs and examples even when asked. Even if said proofs or examples happen to be completely solid and sound, that does not automatically mean those with the closed hearts would be convinced.
30th Jul '17 9:04:30 AM VapourSoulOS
Is there an issue? Send a Message


--> Karjam: If you're an advocate for my philosophy on thoughts, beliefs, imagination and focus, you may come across those who claim the philosophy being difficult or impossible to understand. [[BlatantLies Now, these people aren't saying this because it really is that difficult to under stand.]] Far from it, actually. Rather, they're saying this because they've rejected what should be obvious; they were trying to see meaning in what does not exist, (In other words, they're overthinking things.)Such practices is usually a [[ {{Hypocrite sign of a closed heart.}}]] Therefore, what out when it comes to dealing with them. How they react to being presented with sound, solid truths (which happen to be thoughts) depends on the nature of their [[YouKeepUsingThatWord closed hearts.]] The more closed their hearts are, the worst their reactions will be. As a quick note, simply stating that they're overthinking things (and explaining why they're doing it) [[BlatantLies is usually enough to counter such arguments.]] However, if they keep on insisting without providing sound, solid truths themselves (which happen to be thoughts),[[MoralMyopia what they're doing is arguing by assertion, a logical fallacy.]] In addition, do not give proofs and examples even when asked. Even if said proofs or examples happen to be completely solid and sound, that does not automatically mean those with the closed hearts would be convinced.

to:

--> Karjam: If you're an advocate for my philosophy on thoughts, beliefs, imagination [[IceCreamKoan thoughts]], [[KnowNothingKnowItAll beliefs]], [[MarySue imagination]] and focus, [[BelievingTheirOwnLies focus]], you may come across those who claim the philosophy being difficult or impossible to understand. [[BlatantLies Now, these people aren't saying this because it really is that difficult to under stand.understand.]] Far from it, actually. Rather, they're saying this because [[PsychologicalProjection they've rejected what should be obvious; obvious]]; they were trying to see [[{{Hypocrite}}see meaning in what does not exist, exist]], (In other words, [[BlameGame they're overthinking things.)Such ]])Such practices is usually a [[ {{Hypocrite {{Hypocrite}} sign of a closed heart.}}]] ]] Therefore, what out when it comes to dealing with them. How they react to being presented with sound, solid truths (which happen to be thoughts) depends on the nature of their [[YouKeepUsingThatWord closed hearts.]] The more closed their hearts are, the worst their reactions will be. As a quick note, simply stating that they're overthinking things (and explaining why they're doing it) [[BlatantLies is usually enough to counter such arguments.]] However, if they keep on insisting without providing sound, solid truths themselves (which happen to be thoughts),[[MoralMyopia what they're doing is arguing by assertion, a logical fallacy.]] In addition, do not give proofs and examples even when asked. Even if said proofs or examples happen to be completely solid and sound, that does not automatically mean those with the closed hearts would be convinced.
This list shows the last 10 events of 186. Show all.
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/article_history.php?article=Main.WordSaladPhilosophy