Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / VForVendetta

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Which probably explains why they chose someone like Hugo Weaving to play the part in the film.

to:

** Which probably explains why they chose someone like [[spoiler: Hugo Weaving Weaving]] to play the part in the film.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Which probably explains why they chose someone like Hugo Weaving to play the part in the film.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** On the other hand, the choice is between a genocidal government of fascists that treats all of its citizens like cattle and whom the vast majority are irredeemable bastards, and the (incredibly charismatic) guy who only lost his sanity after said regime used him for experimentation fodder, and who we first see rescuing a young girl from government hired rapists. Certainly it's not black and white, but our sympathies are obviously supposed to be with the latter.

to:

** On the other hand, the choice is between a genocidal government of fascists that treats all of its citizens like cattle and whom the vast majority are irredeemable bastards, and the (incredibly charismatic) guy who only lost his sanity after said regime used him for experimentation fodder, and who we first see rescuing a young girl from government hired rapists. And there are no other options because the government kills any even slightly critical. Certainly it's not black and white, but it's not subtle that our sympathies are obviously supposed to be with the latter.V.

Added: 657

Changed: 686

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** On the other hand, the choice is between a genocidal government of fascists that treats all of its citizens like cattle and whom the vast majority are irredeemable bastards, and the (incredibly charismatic) guy who only lost his sanity after said regime used him for experimentation fodder, and who we first see rescuing a young girl from government hired rapists. Certainly it's not black and white, but our sympathies are obviously supposed to be with the latter.



* MoralDissonance: One of the unfortunate consequences of the film abandoning the BlackAndGrayMorality of the comic. In the comic, V was a murderer, a torturer and a terrorist who cheerfully blew up a good portion of London in the name of creating an anarchist society. We were ''meant'' to feel uneasy about his behavior. The film V is still a murderer, torturer, and terrorist, but the film makes it pretty obvious we are meant to see him as the 'good guy.'
** YourMileageMayVary. Although V shows up "heroic" in movie, moment of FridgeBrilliance makes it clear he is no better. To point: during the film, Norsfire kills less people (not including backflash) than V.

to:

* MoralDissonance: One of the unfortunate consequences of the film abandoning the BlackAndGrayMorality of the comic. In the comic, V was a murderer, a torturer and a terrorist who cheerfully blew up a good portion of London in the name of creating an anarchist society. We were ''meant'' to feel uneasy about his behavior. The film V is still a murderer, torturer, and terrorist, but the film makes it pretty obvious we are meant to see him as the 'good guy.'
'
** YourMileageMayVary. Well, honestly, so does the comic. Any crime V commits is minor compared to the genocide, human experimentation, censorship, systematic rape, child abuse, and altogether inhumanity perpetrated by nearly everyone in the fascist government. Even the government mooks get no sympathy, as the first scene shows a group of them about to gang-rape Evey. Plus V is the one with the cool mask, the charisma, the best lines, shades of TheWoobie, and is the one Sticking It To The Man. YourMileageMayVary on how much you like the "Oh so cool" anarchist, but it's clear from the start that he's written as the hero.
**
Although V shows up "heroic" in movie, moment of FridgeBrilliance makes it clear he is no better. To point: during the film, Norsfire kills less people (not including backflash) than V.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V! 49?


** "''Voilà! In view, a humble vaudevillian veteran, cast vicariously as both victim and villain by the vicissitudes of fate. This visage, no mere veneer of vanity, is a vestige of the vox populi, now vacant, vanished. However, this valorous visitation of a bygone vexation stands vivified, and has vowed to vanquish these venal and virulent vermin vanguarding vice and vouchsafing the violently vicious and voracious violation of volition! The only verdict is vengeance; a vendetta held as a votive, not in vain, for the value and veracity of such shall one day vindicate the vigilant and the virtuous. Verily, this vichyssoise of verbiage veers most verbose, so let me simply add that it's my very good honour to meet you and you may call me V."''

to:

** "''Voilà! ''"'''V'''oilà! In view, '''V'''iew, a humble vaudevillian veteran, '''V'''audevillian '''V'''eteran, cast vicariously '''V'''icariously as both victim '''V'''ictim and villain '''V'''illain by the vicissitudes '''V'''icissitudes of fate. This visage, '''V'''isage, no mere veneer '''V'''eneer of vanity, '''V'''anity, is a vestige '''V'''estige of the vox '''V'''ox populi, now vacant, vanished. '''V'''acant, '''V'''anished. However, this valorous visitation '''V'''alorous '''V'''isitation of a bygone vexation '''V'''exation stands vivified, '''V'''ivified, and has vowed '''V'''owed to vanquish '''V'''anquish these venal '''V'''enal and virulent vermin vanguarding vice '''V'''irulent '''V'''ermin '''V'''anguarding '''V'''ice and vouchsafing '''V'''ouchsafing the violently vicious '''V'''iolently '''V'''icious and voracious violation '''V'''oracious '''V'''iolation of volition! '''V'''olition! The only verdict '''V'''erdict is vengeance; '''V'''engeance; a vendetta '''V'''endetta held as a votive, '''V'''otive, not in vain, '''V'''ain, for the value '''V'''alue and veracity '''V'''eracity of such shall one day vindicate '''V'''indicate the vigilant '''V'''igilant and the virtuous. Verily, '''V'''irtuous. '''V'''erily, this vichyssoise '''V'''ichyssoise of verbiage veers '''V'''erbiage '''V'''eers most verbose, '''V'''erbose, so let me simply add that it's my very '''V'''ery good honour to meet you and you may call me V.'''V'''."''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* PairTheSpares: Implied with [[spoiler: Evey and Finch]] in the film version, during [[spoiler: Finch's monologue about everything being connected.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** They really should have come up with a [[IncrediblyLamePun subtler pun on Hitler]]...

to:

** They really should have come up with Truly, there never was a [[IncrediblyLamePun subtler pun on Hitler]]...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** They really should have come up with a [[IncrediblyLamePun subtler pun on Hitler]]...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

***If only that troper know what Anonymous represents.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
No spoilers in the lead.


Explaining the rest of the plot would spoil it, and you really should read it for yourself. The film is fine too ([[CreatorBacklash unless you ask]] AlanMoore). Although it makes Britain less dark and dystopic, it turns the fascistic government into more of a Bush-Era conservatic StrawmanPolitical to present a more clear good vs. evil conflict, though you might see this movie inverting the roles, [[YourMileageMayVary depending on your political views]] [[spoiler:(and how excusable you think a government massmurdering its own civilians as a pretext for war is)]].

to:

Explaining the rest of the plot would spoil it, and you really should read it for yourself. The film is fine too ([[CreatorBacklash unless you ask]] AlanMoore). Although it makes Britain less dark and dystopic, it turns the fascistic government into more of a Bush-Era conservatic StrawmanPolitical to present a more clear good vs. evil conflict, though you might see this movie inverting the roles, [[YourMileageMayVary depending on your political views]] [[spoiler:(and how excusable you think a government massmurdering its own civilians as a pretext for war is)]].
views]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
note about credits

Added DiffLines:

*** Presumably, this is why (the comic's artist) David Lloyd's name appears in the movie credits, but Alan Moore's doesn't.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:

Added DiffLines:

* WeAllLiveInAmerica: Mostly averted in the movie (like V saying "lift" instead of "elevator") but not always - several uses of "cop" which is generally an Americanism (Brits prefer "copper", Finch pronouncing lever as leh-ver instead of lee-ver, Portman's accent (although YMMV on that last one.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** And Finch.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ChaoticGood: In the movie, at least. In the book, whether he's a terrorist or a freedom fighter is left ambiguous.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Character Alignments not present in work, thus, not used. Speculations towards a given alignment go on the pages themselves.


* LawfulEvil: Norsefire, though the graphic novel emphasizes the "Lawful" while the movie emphasizes the "Evil". Both versions are nasty, but the comic one is a bit more sympathetic.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Moore certainly seemed to think so.
--> '''Moore''': ''The movie has been turned into a Bush-era parable by people too timid to set a political satire in their own country... It's a thwarted and frustrated and largely impotent American liberal fantasy of someone with American liberal values standing up against a state run by neoconservatives — which is not what the comic V for Vendetta was about. It was about fascism, it was about anarchy, it was about England.''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** It's also hard to believe that many members of Anonymous, a group that protests while wearing V masks, have actually read or understood the novel; if they had they might be somewhat less willing use his mask as their face.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The movie arguably completely missed the point of the novel, though YMMV.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Not really; as mentioned above it is definitely open to interpretation as to whether V's actions were the right thing do.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

----
''England prevails.''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** To which she replies cautiously, "Are you a mad person?"

to:

*** To which she replies cautiously, "Are you you, like, a mad crazy person?"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Also: metal sheets. Which are not entirely bulletproof, but do stop V from dying where he stands, instead allowing him to [[spoiler:slowly bleed out as he stumbles his way back to his lair. What, you thought they'd pull the OnlyAFleshWould card?]]

to:

** Also: metal sheets. Which are not entirely bulletproof, but do stop V from dying where he stands, instead allowing him to [[spoiler:slowly bleed out as he stumbles his way back to his lair. What, you thought they'd pull the OnlyAFleshWould OnlyAFleshWound card?]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Also: metal sheets.

to:

** Also: metal sheets. Which are not entirely bulletproof, but do stop V from dying where he stands, instead allowing him to [[spoiler:slowly bleed out as he stumbles his way back to his lair. What, you thought they'd pull the OnlyAFleshWould card?]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Explaining the rest of the plot would spoil it, and you really should read it for yourself. The film is fine too ([[CreatorBacklash unless you ask]] AlanMoore). Although it makes Britain less dark and dystopic, it turns the fascistic government into more of a Bush-Era conservatic StrawmanPolitical to present a more clear good vs. evil conflict, though you might see this movie inverting the roles, [[YourMileageMayVary depending on your political views]].

to:

Explaining the rest of the plot would spoil it, and you really should read it for yourself. The film is fine too ([[CreatorBacklash unless you ask]] AlanMoore). Although it makes Britain less dark and dystopic, it turns the fascistic government into more of a Bush-Era conservatic StrawmanPolitical to present a more clear good vs. evil conflict, though you might see this movie inverting the roles, [[YourMileageMayVary depending on your political views]].views]] [[spoiler:(and how excusable you think a government massmurdering its own civilians as a pretext for war is)]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The change from nuclear to biological weapons was intentional. Alan Moore has later stated that he overestimated England's ability to survive even a limited nuclear war. ScienceMarchesOn, you know.

Added: 323

Changed: 25

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Alan Moore's objection is a bit odd, though, since Brits ''do'' eat this for breakfast and call it "Toad in the Hole." (This name more often describes a sausage dish.)

to:

** Alan Moore's objection is a bit odd, though, since Brits ''do'' eat this for breakfast and call it "Toad in the a Hole." (This name (Toad in ''the'' Hole more often describes a sausage dish.))
**It's especially odd because it was much used during egg rationing to imitate the look of a fried egg. The dried egg became the yellow yolk, and the white bread the white. Probably a recipe his parents didn't use - it doesn't appear in cookbooks much, people tend to just learn it from watching Mum and Dad cook breakfast.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**Though in British popular history, Guy Fawkes is simply remembered as "the man who tried to blow up Parliament". What he intended to do after he'd killed the King, blown up the House of Commons and basically destroyed the entire English system of government is generally seen as pretty irrelevant.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** OBJECTION! Moore himself has said it's up to the reader to decide whether V is right or just crazy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** To which she replies cautiously, "Are you a mad person?"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* CompletelyMissingThePoint - V tries to take down a totalitarian theocracy by dressing like Guy Fawkes, a man whose goal was to create one.

Top