Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / UnrealisticBlackHole

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
typo


Also black holes are often shown as swirling masses that visibly suck everything around them toward them like a giant drain or tornado. Sometimes it is a directional tornado shaped funnel. Well they have to look like somthing.

to:

Also black holes are often shown as swirling masses that visibly suck everything around them toward them like a giant drain or tornado. Sometimes it is a directional tornado shaped funnel. Well they have to look like somthing.
something.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Sonic the Hedgehog 2006's black holes



to:

* The ''End of the World'' level of SonicTheHedgehog2006 features black and purple spheres that suck everything towards them and kill you if you touch them. [[NightmareFuel They also resemble the eye of Sauron]]!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
An interesting possibility with white holes...

Added DiffLines:

*** If one did form, there is also the possibility that all the mass being spewed out ends up coalescing and forming a black hole right in 'front' of the white hole. What happens then, YinYangBomb?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
LHC black hole calculations

Added DiffLines:

**** E=mc^2. Energy is equivalent to mass. You can then figure out what is the size of the black hole (roughly) using simple high school Physics and its gravitational interactions based on how much energy is used to create it. If all of the energy of the 14 Tev LHC is compressed into a black hole, you'd get one that about as massive (and the same gravitational attraction strength) as roughly 76 gold atoms. (15,016 proton masses) The event horizon (where the escape velocity is equal to the speed of light) would be thus 3.7*10^-50 meters. You can fit 1.1*10^102 of those things in a proton.

Changed: 625

Removed: 1725

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* The Doctor Who episode "The Impossible Planet". A planet orbiting a black hole? Why, that's impossible! It would get sucked in! What's especially painful is that the titular planet would appear to be embedded within the hole's accretion disc; it could be fixed with a change in wind direction and a couple of rewritten lines of dialogue, so that the planet manages to continue ''hovering'' over the hole, without orbiting as part of (and eventually getting ground up by) the accretion disc, and without being sandblasted out of existence by the wind. And this is a series that was originally conceived as being educational.
** I thought this might pop up. With the exception of the planet, the black hole itself seems to function as a black hole would. The planet's the trick of the thing, being suspended in place by a species using power and technology more ancient than the man flying the blue box 'round the cosmos to incarcerate ultimate evil. So, the planet's impossible. Is there an...unrealistic planet trope?
*** The planet isn't necessarily unrealistic either. It's perfectly possible for a planet to circle around a black hole without falling in just as well as it can circle around a star and not fall.
*** To further explain, a black hole doesn't have any more or less gravity than the collapsing body that created it, so if there were planets circling a star that became a black hole, those planets would continue to circle said star unaffected until such time as the hole took in enough matter to increase its gravity. The danger of a black hole is that the entire gravitational pull of that star is now collapsed into a single point, so anything getting close gets hit with all of it at once, but you have to be within the original circumference of the collapsing body for that to make much of a difference.
** I'd like to point out that the episode -is- called "Impossible Planet" and the fact that it was surviving near a Black Hole at all was the core plot of the episode...
*** Yes, but the point of this argument is that ''it is NOT impossible'' for a planet to orbit a black hole!
** I think this has been said on another page: the black hole was clearly growing in size/mass/gravity or whatever, so it was 'impossible' for the planet to orbit the black hole without falling in. It was positioned right in front of it for flip sake!

to:

* The Doctor Who episode "The Impossible Planet". A planet orbiting a black hole? Why, that's impossible! It would get sucked in! What's especially painful is that the titular planet would appear to be embedded within the hole's accretion disc; it could be fixed with a change in wind direction and a couple of rewritten lines of dialogue, so that the planet manages to continue ''hovering'' over the hole, without orbiting as part of (and eventually getting ground up by) the accretion disc, and without being sandblasted out of existence by the wind. And this is a series that was originally conceived as being educational.
** I thought this might pop up. With the exception of the planet, the black hole itself seems to function as a black hole would. The planet's the trick of the thing, being suspended in place by a species using power and technology more ancient than the man flying the blue box 'round the cosmos to incarcerate ultimate evil. So, the planet's impossible. Is there an...unrealistic planet trope?
*** The planet isn't necessarily unrealistic either. It's perfectly possible for a planet to circle around a black hole without falling in just as well as it can circle around a star and not fall.
*** To further explain, a black hole doesn't have any more or less gravity than the collapsing body that created it, so if there were planets circling a star that became a black hole, those planets would continue to circle said star unaffected until such time as the hole took in enough matter to increase its gravity. The danger of a black hole is that the entire gravitational pull of that star is now collapsed into a single point, so anything getting close gets hit with all of it at once, but you have to be within the original circumference of the collapsing body for that to make much of a difference.
** I'd like to point out that the episode -is- called "Impossible Planet" and the fact that it was surviving near a Black Hole at all was the core plot of the episode...
*** Yes, but the point of this argument is that ''it is NOT impossible'' for a planet to orbit a black hole!
** I think this has been said on another page: the black hole was clearly growing in size/mass/gravity or whatever, so it was 'impossible' for the planet to orbit the black hole without falling in. It was positioned right in front of it for flip sake!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** A white hole is a time-reversed black hole.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** So what is it?
*** Just kidding.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Lampshaded a bit in that Spock tells Kirk "I cannot pretend to understand how such a thing could possibly exist."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Worse still, the planet [[spoiler:Vulcan]] is consumed by a black hole... in seconds, not the near hour it would take at a minimum; completely, rather than forming an accretion disc; and without flooding the vicinity with enough X rays to vaporize every starship around, shields or no shields.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In the {{Star Wars}} Expanded Universe 'New Jedi Order' series, the Yuuzhan Vong ships actually created tiny black holes as shields (they exist just long enough to absorb incoming ordnance, then collapse). Of course even assuming you could do that, when you collapsed the singularity the destroyed ordnance would burst out as pure energy. The same [[LivingWeapon creature/components]] that do this also propel the ships.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** This black hole is also 2D, or very flat, and surrounded by scary lightning. It is also created from a very tiny amount of mass.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* ''HeroicAge'': black holes do ''not'' look like giant tornados [[RecycledINSPACE in space]]! And you certainly cannot ''punch'' them out of existence, no matter how powerful you are. [[RuleOfCool The effects were nonetheless very awesome.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Typographical error correction.


-->'''Martin Llyod''': Yes.

to:

-->'''Martin Llyod''': Lloyd''': Yes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

**I think this has been said on another page: the black hole was clearly growing in size/mass/gravity or whatever, so it was 'impossible' for the planet to orbit the black hole without falling in. It was positioned right in front of it for flip sake!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* [[StarOceanTillTheEndOfTime Maria's]] Gravity Bullet.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** [[http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0810/0810.5515.pdf Two]] [[http://www.nickbostrom.com/papers/anthropicshadow.pdf papers]] which partly address this issue.

to:

*** [[http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0810/0810.5515.pdf Two]] [[http://www.nickbostrom.com/papers/anthropicshadow.pdf papers]] which partly address concern this issue.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
My previous entry was misunderstood.



to:

*** [[http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0810/0810.5515.pdf Two]] [[http://www.nickbostrom.com/papers/anthropicshadow.pdf papers]] which partly address this issue.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** The risk may however be [[http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0810/0810.5515.pdf higher]] than most would admit.

to:

*** The risk may however be [[http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0810/0810.5515.pdf higher]] than most would admit.

Changed: 198

Removed: 82

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** The risk may however be [[http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0810/0810.5515.pdf higher]] than most would admit.
**** Yeah, no. LHC doesn't do anything that doesn't occur naturally in nature. If black holes aren't popping spontaneously into existence, it won't be happening inside the Hadron Collider, either.
**** I am already aware of this. Please the article before making a snide comment.

to:

*** The risk may however be [[http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0810/0810.5515.pdf higher]] than most would admit.
**** Yeah, no. LHC doesn't do anything that doesn't occur naturally in nature. If black holes aren't popping spontaneously into existence, it won't be happening inside the Hadron Collider, either.
**** I am already aware of this. Please the article before making a snide comment.
admit.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Exactly right. Cosmic rays have been bombarding the Earth's upper atmosphere with far more energy than the LHC is capable of generating for billions of years, and no planet-destroying black holes have yet been spontaneously generated. Also - what's key with a black hole isn't just the ''mass'', but the ''density'' (i.e., the amount of mass in a given volume). Theoretically you can make a black hole out of a sugar cube if you squeeze it hard enough, though the black hole would be ''tiny''; a black hole made out of the combined mass/energy of a few subatomic particles is utterly negligible.

to:

*** Exactly right. Cosmic rays have been bombarding **** I am already aware of this. Please the Earth's upper atmosphere with far more energy than the LHC is capable of generating for billions of years, and no planet-destroying black holes have yet been spontaneously generated. Also - what's key with article before making a black hole isn't just the ''mass'', but the ''density'' (i.e., the amount of mass in a given volume). Theoretically you can make a black hole out of a sugar cube if you squeeze it hard enough, though the black hole would be ''tiny''; a black hole made out of the combined mass/energy of a few subatomic particles is utterly negligible.snide comment.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MegaMan gets a weapon that generates blackholes in ''Mega Man 9''. If those were real black holes, then Earth would get destroyed.

to:

* MegaMan gets a weapon that generates blackholes the Black Hole Bomb in ''Mega Man 9''. If those were real black holes, then Earth would get destroyed.



** MegaManX 8 has the Gravity Well weapon, obtainable from gravity Antonion, who has gravity itself at his command. It creates a slowly-moving black hole that pulls in smaller enemies and can break through crystals, especially those created by Earthrock Trilobite.

to:

** MegaManX 8 Saturn in the Game Boy ''Mega Man 5'' provides the Black Hole weapon. It forms above Mega Man's head, sucks in weak enemies, and then spits out debris.
** ''{{Mega Man X}}8''
has the Gravity Well Squeeze Bomb weapon, obtainable from gravity Gravity Antonion, who has gravity itself at his command. It creates a slowly-moving black hole that pulls in smaller enemies and can break through crystals, especially those created by Earthrock Trilobite.Trilobite.
** The Gravity Well weapon is obtained in ''X3'' from Gravity Beetle. The normal shot makes a localized high-gravity area to crush enemies, while the charged version launches a more powerful version off the top of the screen and is strong enough to drag enemies away.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** More specifically, [[spoiler: the Space Monster just does what members of their species have been shown to do time and time again: break the laws of physics. And the "splitting" of the black hole was actually it becoming a naked singularity, something theorized but unlikely to exist in modern physics, though it probably wouldn't cause a new Big Bang and is basically a black hole you can see into.]] Really, if you pay attention, DieBuster and GunBuster seem to be about the human spirit (or giant monsters from space) overcoming the limits of reality.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Corrected Super Mario Galaxy example


* ''SuperMario Galaxy''. [[spoiler:Bowser's plans go bust, one of his stars collapses and turns into a black hole, universe gets sucked in? Disregarding the fact that it's actually possible to ''fight inside'' said star without dying painfully, black holes... just don't work that way.]] Of course, the reason I didn't think of this while playing the game was the fact that it's ''[[RuleOfCool completely freaking awesome.]]''
** And let's not forget the black holes that function as bottomless pits for each level. Pretty much the only realistic part of them is that they suck.

to:

* ''SuperMario Galaxy''.''SuperMarioGalaxy''. [[spoiler:Bowser's plans go bust, one of his stars collapses and turns into a black hole, universe gets sucked in? Disregarding the fact that it's actually possible to ''fight inside'' said star without dying painfully, black holes... just don't work that way.]] Of course, the reason I didn't think of this while playing the game was the fact that it's ''[[RuleOfCool completely freaking awesome.]]''
** And let's not forget the black holes that function as bottomless pits for each level. Pretty There are pretty much the only two realistic part of them is that things to them: they suck.suck and they red-shift.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The 2009 ''Film/StarTrek''. Not only do characters travel through a black hole to another universe and another time, they [[spoiler:escape its pull after they cross the event horizon (though they ''do'' have faster-than-light technology)]]. What the writers really wanted was a wormhole, especially if they were just going to make up the science.

to:

* The 2009 ''Film/StarTrek''. Not only do characters travel through a black hole to another universe and another time, they [[spoiler:escape its pull after they cross the event horizon (though they ''do'' have faster-than-light technology)]]. What the writers really wanted was a wormhole, especially if they were just going to make up the science. It's not as if ''Star Trek'' doesn't have plenty of swirly spacetime anomalies to pick and choose from anyway, so going with the relatively well-understood phenomenon of a black hole ''and getting every detail about them wrong'' was a little jarring.

Added: 1786

Changed: 960

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

*** Yes, but the point of this argument is that ''it is NOT impossible'' for a planet to orbit a black hole!



*** Exactly right. Cosmic rays have been bombarding the Earth's upper atmosphere with far more energy than the LHC is capable of generating for billions of years, and no planet-destroying black holes have yet been spontaneously generated. Also - what's key with a black hole isn't just the ''mass'', but the ''density'' (i.e., the amount of mass in a given volume). Theoretically you can make a black hole out of a sugar cube if you squeeze it hard enough, though the black hole would be ''tiny''; a black hole made out of the combined mass/energy of a few subatomic particles is utterly negligible.



* Let it be very important to remember that, no matter what else we know of a black whole, ALL OF THAT is out the window once you cross the event horizon, and after that, all bets are off. So far, no one has been able to produce a satisfactory theory on what happens then (Though the hypothesis' are many). It is for this reason that black holes actually still fit this trope in RealLife physics to this day. Short of sending someone through one, and them somehow surviving it, and then impossibly returning or sending information back, we don't know, and never will know, what happens inside.

to:

*** If memory serves this was a theory relating specifically to electrons rather than all subatomic particles, but it has a few problems of its own (such as why electrons always have the same quantised mass and charge, and do not merge with each other).
* Let it be very important to remember that, no matter what else we know of a black whole, hole, ALL OF THAT is out the window once you cross the event horizon, and after that, all bets are off. So far, no one has been able to produce a satisfactory theory on what happens then (Though the hypothesis' are many). It is for this reason that black holes actually still fit this trope in RealLife physics to this day. Short of sending someone through one, and them somehow surviving it, and then impossibly returning or sending information back, we don't know, and never will know, what happens inside.
** ''Strictly speaking'' it's the singularity where our ability to predict events breaks down, not the event horizon. The laws of physics a mile inside a black hole's event horizon are exactly the same as those a mile outside a black hole's event horizon (assuming, of course, that the black hole has a radius of more than one mile) - but the necessary escape velocity is so high that any geodesic you could travel on (that is, a path in spacetime) would ultimately lead back into the black hole rather than out of it, because you'd have to travel faster than the universe will allow to get out.




to:

** Interestingly if you postulate a black hole the apparent size of the universe then it only needs the same density as the universe appears to have...

Added: 196

Changed: 357

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


***The risk may however be [[http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0810/0810.5515.pdf higher]] than most would admit.

to:

***The risk may however be [[http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0810/0810.5515.pdf higher]] than most would admit.
**** Yeah, no. LHC doesn't do anything that doesn't occur naturally in nature. If black holes aren't popping spontaneously into existence, it won't be happening inside the Hadron Collider, either.



* Let it be very important to remember that, no matter what else we know of a black whole, ALL OF THAT is out the window once you cross the event horizon, and after that, all bets are off. So far, no one has been able to produce a satisfactory theory on what happens then (Though the hypothesis' are many). It is for this reason that black holes actually still fit this trope in RealLife physics to this day. Short of sending someone through one, and them somehow surviving it, and then impossibly returning or sending information back, we don't know, and never will know, what happens inside.

to:

* Let it be very important to remember that, no matter what else we know of a black whole, ALL OF THAT is out the window once you cross the event horizon, and after that, all bets are off. So far, no one has been able to produce a satisfactory theory on what happens then (Though the hypothesis' are many). It is for this reason that black holes actually still fit this trope in RealLife physics to this day. Short of sending someone through one, and them somehow surviving it, and then impossibly returning or sending information back, we don't know, and never will know, what happens inside.
inside.
* If singularities ''do'' exist in our universe, then some physicists argue that every singularity point is the start of a new universe. [[RecursiveReality This would mean that our own universe would be inside some other universe's black hole]], though the event horizon that is the expanding edge of our universe forever separates them from one another.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Supermassive black holes are interesting for another aspect: Due to low density and weaker tidal forces, one could cross their event horizon without being ripped apart.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Some scientists are even arguing that the modern concept of black hole is in itself unrealistic, as it's possible that a perfect singularity cannot exist in the time-space continuum as we know it. If that is the case, then the black holes should more accurately be called dark stars (which admittedly sounds even cooler, but has less strange effects to mess with our minds).

to:

** Some scientists are even arguing that the modern concept of black hole is in itself unrealistic, [[http://www.scienceagogo.com/news/black_hole_redux.shtml unrealistic]], as it's possible that a perfect singularity cannot exist in the time-space continuum as we know it. If that is the case, then the black holes should more accurately be called dark stars (which admittedly sounds even cooler, but has less strange effects to mess with our minds).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Also black holes are often shown as swirling masses that visibly suck everything around them toward them like a giant drain or tornado. Sometimes it is a directional tornado shaped funnel.

to:

Also black holes are often shown as swirling masses that visibly suck everything around them toward them like a giant drain or tornado. Sometimes it is a directional tornado shaped funnel.
funnel. Well they have to look like somthing.

Added: 559

Changed: 840

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


**Interestingly, in ''The Andalite Chronicles'' also has the protagonist get sucked into a black hole, though he manages to escape using [[spoiler:the Time Matrix]].

to:

**Interestingly, in ''The Andalite Chronicles'' also has the protagonist get sucked into a black hole, though he manages to escape using [[spoiler:the Time Matrix]].
Matrix]].
* In the StarTrek ExpandedUniverse novel ''Federation'', both Kirk's and Picard's ''Enterprise''s enter something called a "subspace" black hole, which consists of three singularities orbiting each other at ''warp'' speed. Apparently, anything that enters it from any time period appears to exist there simultaneously, allowing the ships to meet. Kirk's ''Enteprise'' passes Zephram Cochrane's shuttle to Picard's ship, and both ships exit at their respective "time zones".




to:

* In the InteractiveFiction game ''{{Gateway}} II: Homeworld'', the [[{{Precursors}} Heechee]] have hidden away from the [[CosmicHorror Assassins]] ''inside'' a black hole. The only way to get through it is with a specially-modified Heechee ship that can survive entering a singularity. The game even goes so far as to describe the devices that allow that to happen.
* In ''StarTrekArmada'', black holes are just background objects, unless a ship's engines are disables. Then they start to fall in and can be destroyed. No time dilation though.
* In ''ConquestFrontierWars'', black holes suck in ships that get too close and may either destroy them or throw them to the other edge of the map. Must be one big slingshot. Used as a plot point in the campaign.
* In ''{{Haegemonia}}'', black holes are giant shiny funnels in space that ''sound'' like a twister. Getting close to then is not recommended. They show up rarely though.

Top