Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / ThereShouldBeALaw

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
My legal writing prof called this the \"Bill Gates\" mistake b/c autocorrect.


* A wide amount of real world examples of this trope stem from Freedom of Speech laws (chiefly the first amendment of the United States constitution and laws like it elsewhere). Simply put, having the freedom to express one's opinion regardless of its content as loud as you want creates something of a mess when what you're saying offends any appreciable number of people.

to:

* A wide amount of real world examples of this trope stem from Freedom of Speech laws (chiefly the first amendment First Amendment of the United States constitution and laws like it elsewhere). Simply put, having the freedom to express one's opinion regardless of its content as loud as you want creates something of a mess when what you're saying offends any appreciable number of people.



** The mother of the former friend has since been charged under Federal law in connection violating the terms of service for MySpace (which she certainly did). Her legal council has contended this is an attempt by the government to "do something" in the face of no real illegality, and such interpretation of the law threatens to make felons out of anyone who violates a website's terms of service. Also, the state is now passing laws to make this illegal, although it can only apply to future cases, because the USA does not permit ex post facto (after the fact) laws. In the end, Lori Drew was convicted of the three misdemeanors that the charges were eventually reduced to, with a possible maximum jail sentence of three years.

to:

** The mother of the former friend has since been charged under Federal law in connection violating the terms of service for MySpace (which she certainly did). Her legal council counsel has contended this is an attempt by the government to "do something" in the face of no real illegality, and such interpretation of the law threatens to make felons out of anyone who violates a website's terms of service. Also, the state is now passing laws to make this illegal, although it can only apply to future cases, because the USA does not permit ex post facto (after the fact) laws. In the end, Lori Drew was convicted of the three misdemeanors that the charges were eventually reduced to, with a possible maximum jail sentence of three years.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
not all tropers are American


* Search your state's criminal code. Chances are, there's some apparently oddball provision in there that is a result of exactly this line of thinking. For example, in Illinois there is [[http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/documents/072000050K12-21.7.htm a law]] which prohibits the sale of Yo-Yo Waterballs. (This was apparently the result of a campaign by a mother whose child had nearly been strangled when the toy's cord wrapped around his neck, an apparently not uncommon complaint with the toy.)

to:

* Search your state's state/country's criminal code. Chances are, there's some apparently oddball provision in there that is a result of exactly this line of thinking. For example, in Illinois there is [[http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/documents/072000050K12-21.7.htm a law]] which prohibits the sale of Yo-Yo Waterballs. (This was apparently the result of a campaign by a mother whose child had nearly been strangled when the toy's cord wrapped around his neck, an apparently not uncommon complaint with the toy.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


See also AndThatsTerrible. In sports, this is the sadistic version of LoopholeAbuse.

to:

See also AndThatsTerrible. AndThatsTerrible and IsNothingSacred. In sports, this is the sadistic version of LoopholeAbuse.LoopholeAbuse.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** TruthInTelevision, [[strike:unfortunately]]. GeorgeHWBush proposed such an amendment, and American conservatives are still kicking it around in some circles.

to:

** TruthInTelevision, [[strike:unfortunately]]. GeorgeHWBush UsefulNotes/GeorgeHWBush proposed such an amendment, and American conservatives are still kicking it around in some circles.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In Creator/JonStewart's ''Literature/AmericaTheBook'', it's stated the President of the United States may say things like "There ought to be a law!", but he cannot make that law. He can only sign or not sign a law passed by the Congress. Sometimes, this can make the President feel like a pussy. Then he remembers that he still has control over the military, and a small island nation gets a can of "police action" opened up on it.

Removed: 484

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Well, they started it.
** We did not start it!
** [[FawltyTowers Yes you did, you invaded Amalek!]]
* In many places where it's considered obscene for women to show their breasts in public, the local government has ruled it illegal to pass a law that only applies to one gender, so women are allowed to go topless in public so long as men are. So someone visiting a beach in Ohio or Quebec might see a woman they think is being indecent but who isn't actually doing anything illegal.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* As of 3/7/14, Massachusetts passed a law to make "upskirting" (surreptitiously taking pictures of women's underwear under their skirts) after it turned out it didn't qualify under the existing Peeping Tom statute because the women weren't "partially or fully naked."

Removed: 464

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
There were laws, they just weren\'t being enforced.


* In 1874, it was discovered that Mary Ellen Wilson, a small girl living in New York City, was being horribly abused by her foster parents. Unfortunately, there were no child welfare laws at the time. In fact, her case was taken by the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to ''Animals''. Her case established the first legal precedent for child abuse in the U.S. and the New York Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children was founded soon after.

Added: 180

Changed: 1189

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''[[LawAndOrderSpecialVictimsUnit Law & Order: SVU]]'' does this quite a bit, naturally. The most ridiculous case was probably the one in which a 17-year-old girl had a disease which made her [[OlderThanTheyLook look perpetually 10]]. The only men who would date her were pedophiles, and the officers kept trying to arrest her boyfriends for enjoying dating a girl who only ''looked'' underage. The writers seemed to think it was a better idea for people who age slowly to remain celibate for their entire lives rather than engage in a relationship with someone who might enjoy it, while simultaneously finding a harmless outlet for urges that could have led to something horrible.
** ''SVU'' ran this into the ground. One example deals with a grown woman having an Elektra Complex affair with her father; when one of the detectives fights to get them arrested for the relationship, she learns...

to:

* ''[[LawAndOrderSpecialVictimsUnit Law & Order: SVU]]'' does this quite a bit, naturally. naturally.
**
The most ridiculous case was probably the one in which a 17-year-old girl had a disease which made her [[OlderThanTheyLook look perpetually 10]]. The only men who would date her were pedophiles, and the officers kept trying to arrest her boyfriends for enjoying dating a girl who only ''looked'' underage. The writers seemed to think it was a better idea for people who age slowly to remain celibate for their entire lives rather than engage in a relationship with someone who might enjoy it, while simultaneously finding a harmless outlet for urges that could have led to something horrible.
** ''SVU'' ran this into the ground. One example deals with a grown woman having an Elektra Complex affair with her father; when one of the detectives fights to get them arrested for the relationship, she learns...



** The SVU officers also have problems with victims of '''''statutory''''' rape being in love with, and wanted to be with, their rapists, even after said "victim" becomes an adult and can make such decisions as whom they fall in love with for themselves. The issue of consensuality seems to escape them at such times.

to:

** The SVU officers also have problems with victims of '''''statutory''''' rape being in love with, and wanted wanting to be with, their rapists, even after said "victim" becomes an adult and can make such decisions as whom they fall in love with for themselves. The issue of consensuality seems to escape them at such times.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In the early '90s Justice Society miniseries, BlackCanary wisecracks while fighting some thugs that "Handguns are just too easy to get these days! There oughta be a law!" This annoyed a letter-writer who took it as social commentary, but it was meant as a knowing wink at the existence of gun-control laws in later decades.

to:

* In the early '90s Justice Society miniseries, BlackCanary ComicBook/BlackCanary wisecracks while fighting some thugs that "Handguns are just too easy to get these days! There oughta be a law!" This annoyed a letter-writer who took it as social commentary, but it was meant as a knowing wink at the existence of gun-control laws in later decades.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In the UK, when banker Fred Goodwin [[CorruptCorporateExecutive helped further ruin an already-ruined economy and then awarded himself a huge pension]], the Government tried to find a way of calling him out on it but failed because everything he'd done was perfectly legal. This caused much public outrage, to the extent where some people apparently thought the Government should just [[CrowningMomentOfFunny temporarily pass a law that being named Fred Goodwin was illegal]]. It was further conflicted by the fact that Parliament do have the powers to confiscate his pension, but doing so would either violate contract law, or be a passing bill of attainder, which, while actually legal in the UK (and was actually one of the reasons for TheAmericanRevolution), is seen as immensely improper to do in any advanced democracy.

to:

* In the UK, when banker Fred Goodwin [[CorruptCorporateExecutive helped further ruin an already-ruined economy and then awarded himself a huge pension]], the Government tried to find a way of calling him out on it but failed because everything he'd done was perfectly legal. This caused much public outrage, to the extent where some people apparently thought the Government should just [[CrowningMomentOfFunny temporarily pass a law that being named Fred Goodwin was illegal]]. It was further conflicted by the fact that Parliament do have the powers to confiscate his pension, but doing so would either violate contract law, or be a passing bill of attainder, which, while actually legal in the UK (and was actually one of the reasons for TheAmericanRevolution), UsefulNotes/TheAmericanRevolution), is seen as immensely improper to do in any advanced democracy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** There now exists [[http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-109publ228/html/PLAW-109publ228.htm a federal law forbidding folks from "[protesting] at funerals at cemeteries under control of the National Cemetery Administration and at Arlington National Cemetery",]] likely directed at the WBC.

to:

** There now exists [[http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-109publ228/html/PLAW-109publ228.htm a federal law forbidding folks from "[protesting] at funerals at cemeteries under control of the National Cemetery Administration and at Arlington National Cemetery",]] [[ObviousRulePatch likely directed at the WBC.WBC]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In his book ''I'm a Stranger Here Myself'', BillBryson talked about American politician Newt Gingrich calling for the ''death penalty'' for pot users, then followed it up with a proposal for a law making it a crime to be Newt Gingrich.

to:

** In his book ''I'm a Stranger Here Myself'', BillBryson Creator/BillBryson talked about American politician Newt Gingrich calling for the ''death penalty'' for pot users, then followed it up with a proposal for a law making it a crime to be Newt Gingrich.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
uk law flaw


** In the UK, some enterprising "common prostitutes" (as opposed to "uncommon" ones) tried to get around a ban on soliciting in the street by shouting from windows or balconies. It didn't work. Similarly, the law makes it illegal to be a pimp, to run a brothel, to use a prostitute subjected to force (whether the client is aware is irrelevant), to solicit on the street, to live from the proceeds of prostitution (except your own), but not to actually ''be'' a prostitute. This is deliberate In other words, the law bends over backwards to try to stop the practice and still avoid criminalizing the vulnerable individuals at the centre of it.

to:

** In the UK, some enterprising "common prostitutes" (as opposed to "uncommon" ones) tried to get around a ban on soliciting in the street by shouting from windows or balconies. It didn't work. Similarly, the law makes it illegal to be a pimp, to run a brothel, to use a prostitute subjected to force (whether the client is aware is irrelevant), to solicit on the street, to live from the proceeds of prostitution (except your own), but not to actually ''be'' a prostitute. This is deliberate In other words, the law bends over backwards to try to stop the practice and still avoid criminalizing the vulnerable individuals at the centre of it. However the law has a major flaw in that it makes it illegal for two or more prostitutes to work in the same place as that makes it a brothel, forcing them to work alone increasing their vulnerability.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Troi defends Barclay's unusual characters, since they a part of his own personal fantasy life into which they were (justifiably) intruding, until she recoils at seeing her own doppelganger. Riker seizes the opportunity to [[TakeThat get back at her]] for chiding him earlier.

to:

** Troi defends Barclay's unusual characters, since they are a part of his own personal fantasy life into which they were (justifiably) intruding, intruding (albeit justifiably), until she recoils at seeing her own doppelganger. Riker seizes the opportunity to [[TakeThat get back at her]] for chiding him earlier.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Lt. Barclay of ''Series/StarTrekTheNextGeneration'' creates fantasy holodeck programs in ''Hollow Pursuits'', featuring the rest of the crew as caricatures of themselves. Riker finds out and objects that it is against regulations. When Geordi points out that no such regulation exists, Riker responds with this trope. Somewhat understandable, as Barclay's version of Riker was particularly unflattering.
** Troi defends Barclay's unusual characters, since they a part of his own personal fantasy life into which they were (justifiably) intruding, until she recoils at seeing her own doppelganger. Riker seizes the opportunity to [[TakeThat get back at her]] for chiding him earlier.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


->Nobody ever came out and said, "Please pass a law so [[NoMatterHowMuchIBeg I can be forced to stop doing something I shouldn't be doing]]," no, it's always "Please pass a law to [[CulturePolice force]] ''[[ActivistFundamentalistAntics them]]'' [[MoralGuardians to stop doing something that I don't like]]."

to:

->Nobody ->''Nobody ever came out and said, "Please pass a law so [[NoMatterHowMuchIBeg I can be forced to stop doing something I shouldn't be doing]]," no, it's always "Please pass a law to [[CulturePolice force]] ''[[ActivistFundamentalistAntics them]]'' [[MoralGuardians to stop doing something that I don't like]].""''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


->Nobody ever came out and said, "please pass a law so [[NoMatterHowMuchIBeg I can be forced to stop doing something I shouldn't be doing]]," no, it's always "please pass a law to [[CulturePolice force]] ''[[ActivistFundamentalistAntics them]]'' [[MoralGuardians to stop doing something that I don't like]]."
-->-- '''Mannie Garcia''' in Creator/RobertAHeinlein's ''Literature/TheMoonIsAHarshMistress''

to:

->Nobody ever came out and said, "please "Please pass a law so [[NoMatterHowMuchIBeg I can be forced to stop doing something I shouldn't be doing]]," no, it's always "please "Please pass a law to [[CulturePolice force]] ''[[ActivistFundamentalistAntics them]]'' [[MoralGuardians to stop doing something that I don't like]]."
-->-- '''Mannie Garcia''' in Creator/RobertAHeinlein's Garcia''', ''Literature/TheMoonIsAHarshMistress''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* "The Opinion Card" is a spin doctor slang term for protecting oneself from prosecution for stating untrue facts (which is slander) by claiming it's just your opinion. The alternate version is packaging an untruthful claim as a question for the same purpose.

to:

* "The Opinion Card" is a spin doctor slang term for protecting oneself from prosecution for stating untrue facts making false statements that hurt someone else's reputation (which is slander) by claiming it's just your opinion. The alternate version is packaging an untruthful claim as a question for the same purpose.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Series/{{Monk}}'' plays this as a joke, constantly. Adrian Monk tries to get police officers to arrest people for doing things like not washing their hands. The biggest example is in "Monk and the Naked Man", where Monk goes absolutely crazy and comes up with insane reasons as to why a nudist is the murderer. Towards the end of the episode, some of his theories basically accuse nudists of being a different species.

to:

* ''Series/{{Monk}}'' plays this as a joke, constantly. Adrian Monk tries to get police officers to arrest people for doing things like not washing their hands. The biggest example is in "Monk "Mr. Monk and the Naked Man", where Monk goes absolutely crazy and comes up with insane reasons as to why a nudist Chance Singer is the murderer. Towards the end of the episode, some of his theories basically accuse nudists of being a different species. He also references this trope phrase when he first arrives at the crime scene, saying "there should be a law against murdering people on a beach."

Changed: 104

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** In another, he brings a senior executive that wouldn't promote his female employees unless they slept with him up on extortion charges, arguing that his behavior is the same as if common mobsters were shaking someone down for protection. The defense is livid at the notion, and TheJudge admits that this is an unorthodox reading of the law, but is willing to allow it anyway and let the jury and/or appellate courts deal with the fallout, because the guy was just ''that'' much of a sleaze.

to:

*** In another, he brings a senior executive that wouldn't promote his female employees unless they slept with him up on extortion charges, arguing that his behavior is the same as if common mobsters were shaking someone down for protection. The defense is livid at the notion, and TheJudge admits that this is an unorthodox reading of the law, but is willing to allow it anyway and let the jury and/or appellate courts deal with the fallout, because arguing that if the guy defendant's behavior was just ''that'' much of a sleaze.bad enough to set new legal precedent, that's ''his'' problem.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** In another, he brings a senior executive that wouldn't promote his female employees unless they slept with him up on extortion charges, arguing that his behavior is the same as if common mobsters were shaking someone down for protection. The defense is livid at the notion, and TheJudge admits that this is an unorthodox reading of the law, but is willing to allow it anyway and let the jury and/or appellate courts deal with the fallout, because the guy was just ''that'' much of a sleaze.

Changed: 502

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** An insurance company that failed to notify a man that his coverage was rejected because he had syphilis, resulting in his going insane and stabbing people some twenty years later.
*** A doctor running a fertilization clinic was found to be using his own sperm, as opposed to "anonymous donors" as he'd been telling his patients. [=McCoy=] is morally outraged, but finds that he can't prosecute him as no law has been broken. Strictly speaking, the doctor himself ''was'' an anonymous donor, so he didn't technically lie to anyone. The best that can be hoped for is ethics charges as criminally, there is no case.

to:

*** An insurance company that failed to notify a man that his coverage was rejected because he had syphilis, resulting in his going the untreated disease eventually causing him to go insane and stabbing stab people some twenty years later.
*** A doctor running a fertilization clinic was found to be using his own sperm, as opposed to "anonymous donors" as he'd been telling his patients. [=McCoy=] is morally outraged, but finds that he can't prosecute him as no law has been broken. Strictly speaking, the doctor himself ''was'' an anonymous donor, so he didn't technically lie to anyone. The best that can be hoped for is ethics charges as criminally, there is no case. He may have committed fraud in a couple instances where the patients wanted fertilized by their husband's sperm, but it would require a paternity test to prove someone else was the father, and the couples in question are so happy to have finally conceived a child that they refuse to take part in any prosecution and cannot be legally compelled to allow said testing. It's one of the few instances on the show where the good guys lose all around.

Added: 991

Changed: 24

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** These "anti-Sharia" laws are particularly stupid in the United States, where the statutory text--so as to avoid accusations of religious discrimination--generally forbids state courts from citing or applying foreign sources of law. This might seem reasonable...until you realize that under TheCommonLaw, the decisions of other common-law jurisdictions are regarded as persuasive precedent and are frequently cited in US decisions. This is less common than it used to be, but it is nevertheless perfectly normal for an American court to cite to English, Canadian, or Australian decisions, and it is something of an affront to the dignity of these sister courts that these statutes forbid citing to them. More frustratingly, the law of contracts allows parties to choose the law governing the contract...so what happens when two Canadians living in Oklahoma (where one of these laws exists) sign a contract under Ontario law and then one of them sues the other to enforce it in Oklahoma...?



* In [[{{Joisey}} New Jersey]], there is the infamous [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyleigh%27s_Law Kyleigh's Law]], whose namesake, 16 year old Kyleigh D'Alessio, died when the 17 year old driver of the vehicle she was in lost control of the vehicle and crashed into a tree. The two other passengers in the car were 16 and 19 years old and the accident happened at 3 am, past the then-midnight curfew and it was rainy besides. So what kind of law does Kyleigh D'Alessio's mother try to get passed and succeed in getting passed? Maybe a law mandating extra emphasis in New Jersey driver's education courses about it being dangerous to drive in bad weather or late at night, let alone a combination of the two? Nope. It upped the curfew from midnight to 11pm, increased restrictions on under-21 provisional drivers as well as changing the name "provisional" to "probationary," and mandated that all probationary drivers under 21 have a red decal on both license plates. That's not even the full list of restrictions. And to make things worse, the teenagers and adults who are on their side about the injustice of the increase in age-based restrictions, especially the red decals that make it so that teenage and 20 year old drivers can be profiled based on their age, are mostly being ignored in favor of [[AdultsAreUseless the politicians and such who are saying to repeal the decal restriction]] [[PaedoHunt because it could make teens vulnerable to predators]].

to:

* In [[{{Joisey}} New Jersey]], UsefulNotes/NewJersey, there is the infamous [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyleigh%27s_Law Kyleigh's Law]], whose namesake, 16 year old Kyleigh D'Alessio, died when the 17 year old driver of the vehicle she was in lost control of the vehicle and crashed into a tree. The two other passengers in the car were 16 and 19 years old and the accident happened at 3 am, past the then-midnight curfew and it was rainy besides. So what kind of law does Kyleigh D'Alessio's mother try to get passed and succeed in getting passed? Maybe a law mandating extra emphasis in New Jersey driver's education courses about it being dangerous to drive in bad weather or late at night, let alone a combination of the two? Nope. It upped the curfew from midnight to 11pm, increased restrictions on under-21 provisional drivers as well as changing the name "provisional" to "probationary," and mandated that all probationary drivers under 21 have a red decal on both license plates. That's not even the full list of restrictions. And to make things worse, the teenagers and adults who are on their side about the injustice of the increase in age-based restrictions, especially the red decals that make it so that teenage and 20 year old drivers can be profiled based on their age, are mostly being ignored in favor of [[AdultsAreUseless the politicians and such who are saying to repeal the decal restriction]] [[PaedoHunt because it could make teens vulnerable to predators]].

Added: 343

Changed: 3

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Most all European constitutions expressly forbid ex post facto laws but the UK and Australia laws are allowed to be retroactive, so once there is a law, they can prosecute. It's not common for your average law to do such, but not unheard of either.

to:

* Most all European constitutions expressly forbid ex post facto laws but in the UK and Australia laws are allowed to be retroactive, so once there is a law, they can prosecute. It's not common for your average law to do such, but not unheard of either.


Added DiffLines:

** There is also a [[TheCommonLaw common-law]] presumption that statutes are not intended to operate ''ex post facto'' (or retroactively in general), so an Act of Parliament must either explicitly state that it applies ''ex post facto'' or word it in such a way that a non-retroactive reading is impossible in order for it to be read that way.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Justifying edit.


*** In BostonLegal's defense, it was actually entertaining when they did it.

Added: 464

Removed: 464

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In 1874, it was discovered that Mary Ellen Wilson, a small girl living in New York City, was being horribly abused by her foster parents. Unfortunately, there were no child welfare laws at the time. In fact, her case was taken by the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to ''Animals''. Her case established the first legal precedent for child abuse in the U.S. and the New York Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children was founded soon after.



* In 1874, it was discovered that Mary Ellen Wilson, a small girl living in New York City, was being horribly abused by her foster parents. Unfortunately, there were no child welfare laws at the time. In fact, her case was taken by the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to ''Animals''. Her case established the first legal precedent for child abuse in the U.S. and the New York Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children was founded soon after.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* In 1874, it was discovered that Mary Ellen Wilson, a small girl living in New York City, was being horribly abused by her foster parents. Unfortunately, there were no child welfare laws at the time. In fact, her case was taken by the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to ''Animals''. Her case established the first legal precedent for child abuse in the U.S. and the New York Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children was founded soon after.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** A secondary cause is any field where innovation outpaces legislation: For example, the case of [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bath_salts_%28drug%29 "Bath Salts"]]. The manufacturers and retailers were not making or selling a controlled substance, as the substance in question wasn't ''on'' the list of controlled substances, at least at the time - most jurisdictions have enacted laws (or broadened existing laws) since. Similarly, wiretapping regulations are struggling to catch up to such [[SarcasmMode recent]] innovations as video game chat and voice-over-IP services.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


->Nobody ever came out and said, "please pass a law so [[NoMatterHowMuchIBeg I can be forced to stop doing something I shouldn't be doing]]," no, it's always "please pass a law to force ''them'' to stop doing something that I don't like."

to:

->Nobody ever came out and said, "please pass a law so [[NoMatterHowMuchIBeg I can be forced to stop doing something I shouldn't be doing]]," no, it's always "please pass a law to force ''them'' [[CulturePolice force]] ''[[ActivistFundamentalistAntics them]]'' [[MoralGuardians to stop doing something that I don't like.like]]."

Top