Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / LyingToThePerp

Go To

OR

Added: 280

Changed: 205

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons'', with the Springfield police catching Homer Simpson by sending him a letter that he'd won a motorboat, before nailing him for his unpaid parking tickets. Despite this Homer still demanded his motorboat.

to:

* ''WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons'', ''WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons'':
** This happens in "[[Recap/TheSimpsonsS9E8LisaTheSkeptic Lisa the Skeptic]]",
with the Springfield police catching Homer Simpson by sending him a letter that he'd won a motorboat, before nailing him for his unpaid parking tickets. Despite this this, Homer still demanded demands his motorboat.



Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Series/{{Castle}}'':

to:

* ''Series/{{Castle}}'':''Series/{{Castle|2009}}'':
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-->-- ''Series/BrooklynNineNine'', [[Recap/BrooklynNineNineS5E14TheBox "The Box"]]

to:

-->-- ''Series/BrooklynNineNine'', [[Recap/BrooklynNineNineS5E14TheBox "The Box"]]
"[[Recap/BrooklynNineNineS5E14TheBox The Box]]"



* Joe Friday of ''Series/{{Dragnet}}'' employs this tactic every now and then.

to:

* Joe Friday of ''Series/{{Dragnet}}'' ''Franchise/{{Dragnet}}'' employs this tactic every now and then.



** The episode "The Drumhead" had an interrogator use this tactic on a young medical bay Lieutenant. A Klingon spying for the Romulans was discovered early in the program shortly after an explosion rocked the ''Enterprise'''s warp core, seemingly committed by sabotage. The explosion was later discovered to be caused by a faulty seal, but convinced of the Lieutenant's guilt by association to the spy, and the fact that his grandfather is Romulan, the interrogator attempts to force a confession out of him by claiming that evidence was found of a corrosive chemical causing the explosion, which the Lieutenant had access to. Subverted when the Lieutenant (rightfully) rebuffs the accusation, and Picard later chides the interrogator for using the tactic as unjustified and uncalled-for. In this case, the unethical interrogator had even opened up the previously private interviews to a public audience; presumably, so that the false accusation would apply even ''more'' pressure by destroying the young officer's reputation whether it was true or not. Picard is then hauled before the interrogator himself for questioning its methods, where he gives her a well-deserved TheReasonYouSuckSpeech, pointing out the similarities with [[DoesThisRemindYouOfAnything numerous other unfair legal processes in the past]].
** When Worf's family is accused of treason by the Klingon High Council, Picard -- suspecting the accusation is a cover-up -- calls a woman who served Worf's family as witness, falsely claiming that she has new evidence. The bluff reveals the real traitor, though the High Council is too compromised to drop the charges and Worf is banished from Klingon society. In fact, the only reason K'mpec even agreed to accuse Worf's father is because he believed only Worf remained of that family, and Worf was safely outside their jurisdiction. He didn't expect Worf to actually go to Qo'noS to defend his father's honor or for Worf to have a brother, living as member of another House.

to:

** In "[[Recap/StarTrekTheNextGenerationS3E17SinsOfTheFather Sins of the Father]]", when Worf's family is accused of treason by the Klingon High Council, Picard -- suspecting the accusation is a cover-up -- calls a woman who served Worf's family as witness, falsely claiming that she has new evidence. The episode "The Drumhead" had bluff reveals the real traitor, though the High Council is too compromised to drop the charges and Worf is banished from Klingon society. In fact, the only reason K'mpec even agreed to accuse Worf's father is because he believed only Worf remained of that family, and Worf was safely outside their jurisdiction. He didn't expect Worf to actually go to Qo'noS to defend his father's honor or for Worf to have a brother, living as member of another House.
** In "[[Recap/StarTrekTheNextGenerationS4E21TheDrumhead The Drumhead]]",
an interrogator use uses this tactic on a young medical bay Lieutenant. A Klingon spying for the Romulans was discovered early in the program shortly after an explosion rocked the ''Enterprise'''s warp core, seemingly committed by sabotage. The explosion was later discovered to be caused by a faulty seal, but convinced of the Lieutenant's guilt by association to the spy, and the fact that his grandfather is Romulan, the interrogator attempts to force a confession out of him by claiming that evidence was found of a corrosive chemical causing the explosion, which the Lieutenant had access to. Subverted when the Lieutenant (rightfully) rebuffs the accusation, and Picard later chides the interrogator for using the tactic as unjustified and uncalled-for. In this case, the unethical interrogator had even opened up the previously private interviews to a public audience; presumably, so that the false accusation would apply even ''more'' pressure by destroying the young officer's reputation whether it was true or not. Picard is then hauled before the interrogator himself for questioning its methods, where he gives her a well-deserved TheReasonYouSuckSpeech, pointing out the similarities with [[DoesThisRemindYouOfAnything numerous other unfair legal processes in the past]]. \n** When Worf's family is accused of treason by the Klingon High Council, Picard -- suspecting the accusation is a cover-up -- calls a woman who served Worf's family as witness, falsely claiming that she has new evidence. The bluff reveals the real traitor, though the High Council is too compromised to drop the charges and Worf is banished from Klingon society. In fact, the only reason K'mpec even agreed to accuse Worf's father is because he believed only Worf remained of that family, and Worf was safely outside their jurisdiction. He didn't expect Worf to actually go to Qo'noS to defend his father's honor or for Worf to have a brother, living as member of another House.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-->--''Series/BrooklynNineNine'', [[Recap/BrooklynNineNineS5E14TheBox "The Box"]]

to:

-->--''Series/BrooklynNineNine'', -->-- ''Series/BrooklynNineNine'', [[Recap/BrooklynNineNineS5E14TheBox "The Box"]]

Added: 1290

Changed: 1378

Removed: 531

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
added example, linked to episodes, placed 2 sister series under franchise heading


* ''Series/{{CSI}}'':
** Warrick convinces a suspect that an on-site DNA test has [=ID'ed=] him as the perp. Really the test only determines if the substance is human blood.
** Another episode had an interesting variant when Sara and Catherine, without comment, brought in a bag issued to employees of an airline the victim worked for. "Well?" Sara asks. The suspect, talking over his lawyer's attempted warnings, then tried to point out that the bag was inadmissible because they didn't have a warrant to search his car. Then Sara informed him that the bag didn't belong to the victim but did contain a recording device.
** Subverted when Warrick is the one being interrogated for the murder of mob boss Lou Gedda. The detective tries to goad Warrick into a confession, spinning a wild story of revenge and justice, telling him they have evidence that he did it, and even bringing up Warrick's guilt over the death of Holly Gribbs (from the pilot episode). At the end, Warrick calmly looks up at the cop and tells him he's going to have to "step up his game" to get him to crack.

to:

* ''Franchise/CSIVerse'':
**
''Series/{{CSI}}'':
** *** Warrick convinces a suspect that an on-site DNA test has [=ID'ed=] him as the perp. Really the test only determines if the substance is human blood.
** *** Another episode had an interesting variant when Sara and Catherine, without comment, brought in a bag issued to employees of an airline the victim worked for. "Well?" Sara asks. The suspect, talking over his lawyer's attempted warnings, then tried to point out that the bag was inadmissible because they didn't have a warrant to search his car. Then Sara informed him that the bag didn't belong to the victim but did contain a recording device.
** *** Subverted when Warrick is the one being interrogated for the murder of mob boss Lou Gedda. The detective tries to goad Warrick into a confession, spinning a wild story of revenge and justice, telling him they have evidence that he did it, and even bringing up Warrick's guilt over the death of Holly Gribbs (from the pilot episode). At the end, Warrick calmly looks up at the cop and tells him he's going to have to "step up his game" to get him to crack.crack.
** ''Series/{{CSINY}}'':
*** "[[Recap/CSINYS01E09 Officer Blue]]" has a victim whose head was [[NoHoldsBarredBeatdown slammed repeatedly in a restaurant oven]]; the victim staggered out of the restaurant and collapsed on the street. During the interrogation, the suspect is told by Aiden, "Lennie walked three blocks and later was stabbed to death. By you." The suspect immediately admits to the head-slam but not the stabbing, only to discover the victim died of the head trauma and was never stabbed at all.
---->'''Aiden:''' We can lie to suspects. Legally.
*** In "[[Recap/CSINYS05E18 Point of No Return]]," Stella lies to a Greek antiquities smuggler, telling him she'll let him go if he confesses. She has him sent to Cypress (where he's wanted for murder) in a shipping container instead. [[note]]ItMakesSenseInContext[[/note]]



* An early ''Series/{{CSINY}}'' episode has a victim whose head was [[NoHoldsBarredBeatdown slammed repeatedly in a restaurant oven]]; the victim staggered out of the restaurant and collapsed on the street. During the interrogation, the suspect is told by Aiden, "Lennie walked three blocks and later was stabbed to death. By you." The suspect immediately admits to the head-slam but not the stabbing, only to discover the victim died of the head trauma and was never stabbed at all.
-->'''Aiden:''' We can lie to suspects. Legally.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Series/{{Luther}}'' used this fairly often, although a particularly notable case involved an older detective telling a man that [[TheTell his mouth twitches when he's nervous]], thus giving away any lie that the man might attempt, even offering to let the man see the recorded footage if he doubts the detective. Later in the interrogation, after the detective starts laying out everything the police know and what they suspect, he notes that the man's mouth is twitching again. The man tells the police everything, and at the end of the episode a curious Luther asks the older detective about the interview and whether he was being honest about the man giving himself away. The detective smirks and says he's been using the same lie on suspects since the 80s without them ever catching on.

Added: 263

Removed: 272

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Film/{{Death on the Nile|1978}}'': Hercule Poirot tells the murderer that he can prove he fired the murder weapon by applying heated wax to his fingertips to reveal the presence of gunpowder on his fingers. No such test exists, but the killer confesses anyway



** In the movie adaption of ''Literature/DeathOnTheNile'', he tells the murderer that he can prove he fired the murder weapon by applying heated wax to his fingertips to reveal the presence of gunpowder on his fingers. No such test exists, but the killer confesses anyway.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* UK law forbids their police from lying to suspects during interrogations. This is counterbalanced by the suspect's right to silence in England being the relatively weaker YouDoNotHaveToSayAnything (which allows prosecutors to infer negatively if the suspect shuts up to the police for no good reason) compared to the US' MirandaRights (where the prosecution cannot).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Can be used in the party game ''TabletopGame/Werewolf1986''. In one case, Player A claimed to be the seer and accused Player B of being a werewolf, hounding him sufficiently to extract a confession. Player A then confessed that he had no evidence of Player B being a wolf in the first place.

to:

* Can be used in the party game ''TabletopGame/Werewolf1986''.''TabletopGame/Werewolf1997''. In one case, Player A claimed to be the seer and accused Player B of being a werewolf, hounding him sufficiently to extract a confession. Player A then confessed that he had no evidence of Player B being a wolf in the first place.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Can be used in the party game ''TabletopGame/{{Werewolf}}''. In one case, Player A claimed to be the seer and accused Player B of being a werewolf, hounding him sufficiently to extract a confession. Player A then confessed that he had no evidence of Player B being a wolf in the first place.

to:

* Can be used in the party game ''TabletopGame/{{Werewolf}}''.''TabletopGame/Werewolf1986''. In one case, Player A claimed to be the seer and accused Player B of being a werewolf, hounding him sufficiently to extract a confession. Player A then confessed that he had no evidence of Player B being a wolf in the first place.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Moving the clearer one from Quotes


->''"It's legal! The Supreme Court said that we're allowed to lie in an interrogation. I told a perp that I knew Steph Curry a couple of days ago. It had nothing to do with the case, but I could say it."''
-->--'''Det. Jake Peralta''', ''Series/BrooklynNineNine''

to:

->''"It's ->'''Holt:''' We're not lying.\\
'''Det. Jake Peralta:''' It's
legal! The Supreme Court supreme court said that we're allowed to lie in an interrogation. I told a perp that I knew Steph Curry a couple of days ago. It had nothing to do with the case, but I could say it."''
-->--'''Det. Jake Peralta''', ''Series/BrooklynNineNine''
it.
-->--''Series/BrooklynNineNine'', [[Recap/BrooklynNineNineS5E14TheBox "The Box"]]

Top