Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / LegacyVesselNaming

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
indexing a page I found

Added DiffLines:

Works with their own pages:
[[index]]
* ''[[LegacyVesselNaming/StarTrek Star Trek]]''
[[/index]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In the ''Franchise/StarTrek'' novel ''Literature/ShipOfTheLine'', after the ''Enterprise''-D is destroyed, Starfleet rechristens the ''Sovereign''-class ship being completed at Starbase 12 as the ''Enterprise''-E. At the end of the novel, another ship is rechristened as the ''Bozeman II''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Holland-America Line is an even bigger offender, with three ''Nieuw Amsterdam''s, four each named ''Maasdam'' and ''Statendam''[[note]]five if you count the ship completed as HMS Justicia during World War I and was sunk under that name, six if you count the current ''Nieuw Statendam''[[/note]], and '''six''' ''Rotterdam''s.

to:

** Holland-America Line is an even bigger offender, with three ''Nieuw Amsterdam''s, four each named ''Maasdam'' and ''Statendam''[[note]]five if you count the ship completed as HMS Justicia ''Justicia'' during World War I and was sunk under that name, six if you count the current ''Nieuw Statendam''[[/note]], and '''six''' ''Rotterdam''s.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** When the US in WWII launched its new Essex-class aircraft carriers, CV-10, the second ship of the class was supposed to be named ‘Bonhomme Richard’, but while under construction it was decided to name it ‘Yorktown’ after the aircraft carrier USS Yorktown CV-5 who had just been sunk at the Battle of Midway. Curiously the CV-5 was already the third US ship named Yorktown, making CV-10 the fourth.

to:

** When the US in WWII launched its new Essex-class aircraft carriers, CV-10, the second ship of the class was supposed to be named ‘Bonhomme Richard’, ''Bonhomme Richard'', but while under construction it was decided to name it ‘Yorktown’ ''Yorktown'' after the aircraft carrier USS Yorktown CV-5 who had just been sunk at the Battle of Midway. Curiously the CV-5 was already the third US ship named Yorktown, ''Yorktown'', making CV-10 the fourth.



* After in 1831, captain Dutch navy captain Jan van Speijk blew up his ship with himself still on it rather than have it fall into the hands of the Belgian insurgents, Dutch king Willem 1 issued a Royal Decree that as long as the Dutch will have a navy, there will always be a warship called ‘ Speijk’ to honor the captain’s name. The current frigate HNLMS Van Speijk (F828) is the seventh Dutch warship of that name.

to:

* After in 1831, captain Dutch navy captain Jan van Speijk blew up his ship with himself still on it rather than have it fall into the hands of the Belgian insurgents, Dutch king Willem 1 issued a Royal Decree that as long as the Dutch will have a navy, there will always be a warship called ‘ Speijk’ ''Speijk'' to honor the captain’s name. The current frigate HNLMS Van Speijk ''Van Speijk'' (F828) is the seventh Dutch warship of that name.



* In the age of sail, ships were often captured from an enemy and then pressed into service without being renamed. The captured ship then might have more ships named after it, hence British ships being given French names like Guerrière or Téméraire. The country that originally built the captured ship might also keep naming more after it, leading to confusion when ships with identical names were on opposing sides.

to:

* In the age of sail, ships were often captured from an enemy and then pressed into service without being renamed. The captured ship then might have more ships named after it, hence British ships being given French names like Guerrière ''Guerrière'' or Téméraire.''Téméraire''. The country that originally built the captured ship might also keep naming more after it, leading to confusion when ships with identical names were on opposing sides.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Cunard for instance has had two ships each named ''Mauretania'', ''Ivernia'', ''Saxonia'', ''Parthia'', or ''Carinthia'', three each named ''Caronia'', ''Franconia'', and of course, the sequentially named Queens, ''Queen Mary 2'' and ''Queen Elizabeth 2'' (the latter of which, oddly enough, was succeeded by a third ''Queen Elizabeth'', but without a "3" suffix[[note]]this is because the third ''QE'' -- which is a cruise ship, not an ocean liner -- was named after Queen Elizabeth I, ''not'' Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother; she was followed by the cruise ships ''Queen Victoria'' and the ''Queen Anne'', completing the "set" of Cunard cruise ships named after British queens regnant[[/note]]).

to:

** Cunard for instance has had two ships each named ''Mauretania'', ''Ivernia'', ''Saxonia'', ''Parthia'', or ''Carinthia'', three each named ''Caronia'', ''Franconia'', and of course, the sequentially named Queens, ''Queen Mary 2'' and ''Queen Elizabeth 2'' (the latter of which, oddly enough, was succeeded by a third ''Queen Elizabeth'', but without a "3" suffix[[note]]this is because the third ''QE'' -- which is a cruise ship, not an ocean liner -- was named after Queen Elizabeth I, ''not'' Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother; she was followed by the cruise ships ''Queen Victoria'' and the ''Queen Anne'', completing the forming a "set" of Cunard cruise ships named after British queens regnant[[/note]]).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Cunard for instance has had two ships each named ''Mauretania'', ''Ivernia'', ''Saxonia'', ''Parthia'', or ''Carinthia'', three each named ''Caronia'', ''Franconia'', and of course, the sequentially named Queens, ''Queen Mary 2'' and ''Queen Elizabeth 2'' (the latter of which, oddly enough, was succeeded by a third ''Queen Elizabeth'', but without a "3" suffix).

to:

** Cunard for instance has had two ships each named ''Mauretania'', ''Ivernia'', ''Saxonia'', ''Parthia'', or ''Carinthia'', three each named ''Caronia'', ''Franconia'', and of course, the sequentially named Queens, ''Queen Mary 2'' and ''Queen Elizabeth 2'' (the latter of which, oddly enough, was succeeded by a third ''Queen Elizabeth'', but without a "3" suffix).suffix[[note]]this is because the third ''QE'' -- which is a cruise ship, not an ocean liner -- was named after Queen Elizabeth I, ''not'' Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother; she was followed by the cruise ships ''Queen Victoria'' and the ''Queen Anne'', completing the "set" of Cunard cruise ships named after British queens regnant[[/note]]).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** When the US in WWII launched its new Essex-class aircraft carriers, CV-10, the second ship of the class was supposed to be named ‘Bonhomme Richard’, but while under construction it was decided to name it ‘Yorktown’ after the aircraft carrier USS Yorktown CV-5 who had just been sunk at the Battle of Midway. Curiously the CV-5 was already the third US ship named Yorktown, making CV-10 the fourth.


Added DiffLines:

* After in 1831, captain Dutch navy captain Jan van Speijk blew up his ship with himself still on it rather than have it fall into the hands of the Belgian insurgents, Dutch king Willem 1 issued a Royal Decree that as long as the Dutch will have a navy, there will always be a warship called ‘ Speijk’ to honor the captain’s name. The current frigate HNLMS Van Speijk (F828) is the seventh Dutch warship of that name.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-->--''Series/StarTrekTheNextGeneration'', Season 6 Episode 4, Relics"

to:

-->--''Series/StarTrekTheNextGeneration'', -->-- ''Series/StarTrekTheNextGeneration'', Season 6 Episode 4, Relics"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Holland-America Line is an even bigger offender, with three ''Nieuw Amsterdam''s, four each named ''Maasdam'', and ''Statendam''[[note]]five if you count the ship completed as HMS Justicia during World War I and was sunk under that name, six if you count the current ''Nieuw Statendam''[[/note]], and '''six''' ''Rotterdam''s.

to:

** Holland-America Line is an even bigger offender, with three ''Nieuw Amsterdam''s, four each named ''Maasdam'', ''Maasdam'' and ''Statendam''[[note]]five if you count the ship completed as HMS Justicia during World War I and was sunk under that name, six if you count the current ''Nieuw Statendam''[[/note]], and '''six''' ''Rotterdam''s.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Holland-America Line is an even bigger offender, with three ''Nieuw Amsterdam''s, four each named ''Maasdam'', ''Statendam''[[note]]five if you count the ship completed as HMS Justicia during World War I and was sunk under that name, six if you count the current ''Nieuw Statendam''[[/note]] and '''six''' ''Rotterdam''s.

to:

** Holland-America Line is an even bigger offender, with three ''Nieuw Amsterdam''s, four each named ''Maasdam'', and ''Statendam''[[note]]five if you count the ship completed as HMS Justicia during World War I and was sunk under that name, six if you count the current ''Nieuw Statendam''[[/note]] Statendam''[[/note]], and '''six''' ''Rotterdam''s.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Cunard for instance has had two ships each named ''Mauretania'', ''Ivernia'', ''Saxonia'', ''Parthia'', or ''Carinthia'', three each named ''Caronia'', ''Franconia'', and of course, the sequentially named Queens, ''Queen Mary 2'' and ''Queen Elizabeth 2'' (the latter of which, oddly enough, was succeeded by a third ''Queen Elizabeth'', but without "3" suffix).

to:

** Cunard for instance has had two ships each named ''Mauretania'', ''Ivernia'', ''Saxonia'', ''Parthia'', or ''Carinthia'', three each named ''Caronia'', ''Franconia'', and of course, the sequentially named Queens, ''Queen Mary 2'' and ''Queen Elizabeth 2'' (the latter of which, oddly enough, was succeeded by a third ''Queen Elizabeth'', but without a "3" suffix).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Holland-America Line is an even bigger offender, with three ''Nieuw Amsterdam''s, four each named ''Maasdam'', ''Statendam''s[[note]]five if you count the ship completed as HMS Justicia during World War I and was sunk under that name, six if you count the current ''Nieuw Statendam''[[/note]] and '''six''' ''Rotterdam''s.

to:

** Holland-America Line is an even bigger offender, with three ''Nieuw Amsterdam''s, four each named ''Maasdam'', ''Statendam''s[[note]]five ''Statendam''[[note]]five if you count the ship completed as HMS Justicia during World War I and was sunk under that name, six if you count the current ''Nieuw Statendam''[[/note]] and '''six''' ''Rotterdam''s.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Similarly, many merchant shipping lines named ships after older vessels of theirs that were retired or otherwise lost.
** Cunard for instance has had two ships each named ''Mauretania'', ''Ivernia'', ''Saxonia'', ''Parthia'', or ''Carinthia'', three each named ''Caronia'', ''Franconia'', and of course, the sequentially named Queens, ''Queen Mary 2'' and ''Queen Elizabeth 2'' (the latter of which, oddly enough, was succeeded by a third ''Queen Elizabeth'', but without "3" suffix).
** Holland-America Line is an even bigger offender, with three ''Nieuw Amsterdam''s, four each named ''Maasdam'', ''Statendam''s[[note]]five if you count the ship completed as HMS Justicia during World War I and was sunk under that name, six if you count the current ''Nieuw Statendam''[[/note]] and '''six''' ''Rotterdam''s.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[folder:Fan Works]]
* In the epilogue of ''Fanfic/IntelligenceFactor'', Tapu Lele is on a ship called the ''U.S.S. Thiver'', named after her Inteleon.
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


In Myth/NauticalFolklore, naming a ship after a vessel chiefly remembered for having bad luck is considered taboo. Probably few shipbuilders would be consciously believing in superstition; they would be believing that few passengers would get on. Likewise few passengers would be consciously believing this. Still it would somehow "not be proper" to launch a second ''Titanic''. See WhatDidYouExpectWhenYouNamedIt.

to:

In Myth/NauticalFolklore, naming a ship after a vessel chiefly remembered for having bad luck is considered taboo. Probably few shipbuilders would be consciously believing believe in such superstition; they would be believing believe that few passengers would get on. Likewise few passengers would be consciously believing this. Still it would somehow "not be proper" to launch a second ''Titanic''. See WhatDidYouExpectWhenYouNamedIt.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* [[DefiedTrope Defied]] in [[Series/StargateSG1 Stargate SG-1]] after Stargate Command refuse Colonel O'Neill's request to name the X-303 ''Enterprise''. Instead it was named the ''Prometheus'', much to his dismay.
--> '''O'Neill''': ''"It's a Greek tragedy, who wants that?"''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** The season 3 episode "[[StarTrekTheNextGenerationS3E15YesterdaysEnterprise Yesterday's Enterprise]]" where the previous ship, the ''Enterprise''-C accidentally traveled forward in time in the middle of the battle that would see her destroyed defending a Klingon colony from a Romulan attack. The disappearance looked like flight from battle and thus cowardice to the Klingons, who are now winning an attrition war against the Federation. The episode's plot is about [[SetRightWhatOnceWentWrong sending]] the ''Enterprise''-C back to face her doom while fending off angry klingon warships in the present.

to:

*** The season 3 episode "[[StarTrekTheNextGenerationS3E15YesterdaysEnterprise "[[Recap/StarTrekTheNextGenerationS3E15YesterdaysEnterprise Yesterday's Enterprise]]" where the previous ship, the ''Enterprise''-C accidentally traveled forward in time in the middle of the battle that would see her destroyed defending a Klingon colony from a Romulan attack. The disappearance looked like flight from battle and thus cowardice to the Klingons, who are now winning an attrition war against the Federation. The episode's plot is about [[SetRightWhatOnceWentWrong sending]] the ''Enterprise''-C back to face her doom while fending off angry klingon warships in the present.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** The season 3 episode "[[StarTrekTheNextGenerationS3E15YesterdaysEnterprise Yesterday's Enterprise]]" where the previous ship, the ''Enterprise''-C accidentally traveled forward in time in the middle of the battle that would see her destroyed defending a Klingon colony from a Romulan attack. The disappearance looked like flight from battle and thus cowardice to the Klingons, who are now winning an attrition war against the Federation. The episode's plot is about [[SetRightWhatOnceWentWrong sending]] the ''Enterprise''-C back to face her doom while fending off angry klingon warships in the present.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The opening of ''Film/StarTrekGenerations'' takes place aboard the maiden voyage of the USS ''Enterprise''-B and has Kirk, Scotty, and Chekov of the two previous ''Enterprise''s as honorary guests. At the end, the ''Enterprise''-D is mostly destroyed (the saucer section lands on a planet and can't be recovered). At the beginning of the next movie (''Film/StarTrekFirstContact''), the crew is aboard the new ''Enterprise''-E. This is even lampshaded when the heroes decide to engage the self-destruct to kill all the Borg infesting her:

to:

** The opening of ''Film/StarTrekGenerations'' takes place aboard the maiden voyage of the USS ''Enterprise''-B and has Kirk, Scotty, and Chekov of the two previous ''Enterprise''s as honorary guests. At the end, the ''Enterprise''-D is mostly destroyed (the stardrive section explodes from catastrophic damage, the saucer section lands on a planet and can't be recovered). At the beginning of the next movie (''Film/StarTrekFirstContact''), the crew is aboard the new ''Enterprise''-E. This is even lampshaded when the heroes decide to engage the self-destruct to kill all the Borg infesting her:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The opening sequence from ''Series/StarTrekEnterprise'' features a montage of a number of historical ships named ''Enterprise'', from the 1705 original through to the titular starship in 2151.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[quoteright:350:[[Film/TitanicII https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/titanic_2_2.jpg]]]]
[[caption-width-right:350:[[TemptingFate What could possibly go wrong?]]]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** This is ''finally'' extended to other ships with the brief appearance of the 32nd century USS ''[[Series/StarTrekVoyager Voyager]]'' (NCC-74656-J) in the ''[[Series/StarTrekDiscovery Discovery]]'' episode "[[Recap/StarTrekDiscoveryS3E05DieTrying Die Trying]]". Additionally, the USS ''Tikhov'' in the same episode has the registry NCC-1067-M and it's mentioned that the ''Tikhov'' has served as a seed vault since the 23rd century; this combined with its low registry number suggests that the ship is the latest (specifically the 14th) in a line of ships that have borne the same name, rather than the exact same ship from 900 years ago.

to:

*** This is ''finally'' extended to other ships with the brief appearance of the 32nd century USS ''[[Series/StarTrekVoyager Voyager]]'' (NCC-74656-J) Voyager]]'', NCC-74656-J, in the ''[[Series/StarTrekDiscovery Discovery]]'' episode "[[Recap/StarTrekDiscoveryS3E05DieTrying Die Trying]]". Additionally, the USS ''Tikhov'' in the same episode has the registry NCC-1067-M and it's mentioned that the ''Tikhov'' has served as a seed vault since the 23rd century; this combined with its low registry number suggests that the ship is the latest (specifically the 14th) in a line of ships that have borne the same name, rather than the exact same ship from 900 years ago. Finally, in the episode following, "[[Recap/StarTrekDiscoveryS3E06Scavengers Scavengers]]," the tradition is extended to ''DISCO'' herself, as the ship gets an -A suffix in addition to a thousand years of [[MidSeasonUpgrade Mid-Season Upgrades]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The first ''Defiant''-class USS ''Defiant'' is itself an example of this, since it was named after the ''Constitution''-class USS ''Defiant'' from ''Series/StarTrekTheOriginalSeries''.

to:

** The first ''Defiant''-class USS ''Defiant'' is itself an example of this, since it was named after the ''Constitution''-class USS ''Defiant'' from ''Series/StarTrekTheOriginalSeries''.''Series/StarTrekTheOriginalSeries'', the one that ended up getting sucked into the MirrorUniverse.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** The ''White Star'' herself was named as an inversion of the Minbari flagship ''Drala Fi'' (Black Star), which was destroyed by Sheridan by luring her into an ambush and the only time a human ship commander managed to destroy a Minbari capital ship and live to tell the tale (most others were destroyed by ramming). While the Minbari warrior castle consider Sheridan's tactic to be dishonorable, the spiritual caste feels differently, hence the name of the new ship.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Mentioned in the first ''Literature/ArrivalsFromTheDark'' novel. Some [[SpaceNavy USF]] ships are named after wet navy ships of the past. The example given, the cruiser ''Oberon'', was named after the British submarine HMS ''Oberon''. The book then does a brief comparison of their specs and points out that the new ''Oberon'' could easily take on all the navies of the 20th century combined.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Similarly, ''VideoGame/StarTrekArmada'' has ships start getting letters added after their names when the name list runs out. Unfortunately, it can also make it possible for more than one ship of the same name (not counting the letter) to be in the fleet at the same time.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** This is ''finally'' extended to other ships with the brief appearance of the 32nd century USS ''[[Series/StarTrekVoyager Voyager]]'' (NCC-74656-J) in the ''[[Series/StarTrekDiscovery Discovery]]'' episode "Die Trying". Additionally, the USS ''Tikhov'' in the same episode has the registry NCC-1067-M and it's mentioned that the ''Tikhov'' has served as a seed vault since the 23rd century; this combined with its low registry number suggests that the ship is the latest in a line of ships that have borne the same name, rather than the exact same ship from 900 years ago.

to:

** *** This is ''finally'' extended to other ships with the brief appearance of the 32nd century USS ''[[Series/StarTrekVoyager Voyager]]'' (NCC-74656-J) in the ''[[Series/StarTrekDiscovery Discovery]]'' episode "Die Trying". "[[Recap/StarTrekDiscoveryS3E05DieTrying Die Trying]]". Additionally, the USS ''Tikhov'' in the same episode has the registry NCC-1067-M and it's mentioned that the ''Tikhov'' has served as a seed vault since the 23rd century; this combined with its low registry number suggests that the ship is the latest (specifically the 14th) in a line of ships that have borne the same name, rather than the exact same ship from 900 years ago.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** This is ''finally'' extended to other ships with the brief appearance of the 32nd century USS ''Voyager'' (NCC-74656-J) in the ''[[Series/StarTrekDiscovery Discovery]]'' episode "Die Trying". The USS ''Tikhov'' in the same episode has the registry NCC-1067-M and it's mentioned that the ''Tikhov'' has served as a seed vault since the 23rd century; this combined with its low registry number suggests that the ship is the latest in a line of ships that have borne the same name, rather than the exact same ship from 900 years ago.

to:

** This is ''finally'' extended to other ships with the brief appearance of the 32nd century USS ''Voyager'' ''[[Series/StarTrekVoyager Voyager]]'' (NCC-74656-J) in the ''[[Series/StarTrekDiscovery Discovery]]'' episode "Die Trying". The Additionally, the USS ''Tikhov'' in the same episode has the registry NCC-1067-M and it's mentioned that the ''Tikhov'' has served as a seed vault since the 23rd century; this combined with its low registry number suggests that the ship is the latest in a line of ships that have borne the same name, rather than the exact same ship from 900 years ago.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** This is ''finally'' extended to other ships with the brief appearance of the 32nd century USS ''Voyager'' (NCC-74656-J) in the ''[[Series/StarTrekDiscovery Discovery]]'' episode "Die Trying". The USS ''Tikhov'' in the same episode has the registry NCC-1067-M and it's mentioned that the ''Tikhov'' has served as a seed vault since the 23rd century; this combined with its low registry number suggests that the ship is the latest in a line of ships that have borne the same name, rather than the exact same ship from 900 years ago.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


A newly built [[CoolBoat ship]], [[CoolStarship spaceship]], or [[TravelCool other large named vehicle]] is christened with the name of another vessel, one that has been previously destroyed. This is done to demonstrate a profound attachment the ship crew had to their old ship, or how illustrious the predecessor ship was, but simultaneously [[WhatDidYouExpectWhenYouNamedIt serves as a bad omen regarding the new ship's fate]] (or not).

to:

A newly built [[CoolBoat ship]], [[CoolStarship spaceship]], or [[TravelCool other large named vehicle]] is christened with the name of another vessel, one that has been previously destroyed.destroyed or decommissioned after an illustrious service life. This is done to demonstrate a profound attachment the ship crew had to their old ship, or how illustrious the predecessor ship was, but simultaneously [[WhatDidYouExpectWhenYouNamedIt serves as a bad omen regarding the new ship's fate]] (or not).

Top