Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / KuleshovEffect

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
oops


* An edited ''Franchise/''StarWars video made [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hN74bOubUug its way around social media]], combining footage from ''Film/ANewHope'' where Obi-Wan talks to Luke about his father Anakin, and showing Anakin's fall in ''Film/RevengeOfTheSith''. It's evident that Creator/AlexGuinness had no idea the actual history there, but his performance is nuanced enough with a tint of sadness that the edited video is heartbreaking.

to:

* An edited ''Franchise/''StarWars ''Franchise/StarWars'' video made [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hN74bOubUug its way around social media]], combining footage from ''Film/ANewHope'' where Obi-Wan talks to Luke about his father Anakin, and showing Anakin's fall in ''Film/RevengeOfTheSith''. It's evident that Creator/AlexGuinness Creator/AlecGuinness had no idea the actual history there, but his performance is nuanced enough with a tint of sadness that the edited video is heartbreaking.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


More generally, the Kuleshov Effect is the basis of Soviet montage cinema, and is used in many many films since. The idea is that, by editing different things together, it is possible to create meanings that didn't exist in either of the images put together - constructing 'sentences' and 'texts' out of film.

to:

More generally, the Kuleshov Effect is the basis of Soviet montage cinema, and is used in many many films since. The idea is that, by editing different things together, it is possible to create meanings that didn't exist in either of the images put together - constructing together--constructing 'sentences' and 'texts' out of film.



* An edited Franchise/StarWars video made [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hN74bOubUug its way around social media]], combining footage from Film/ANewHope where Obi-Wan talks to Luke about his father Anakin, and showing Anakin's fall in Film/RevengeOfTheSith. It's evident that Alex Guinness had no idea the actual history there, but his performance is nuanced enough with a tint of sadness that the edited video is heartbreaking.

to:

* An edited Franchise/StarWars ''Franchise/''StarWars video made [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hN74bOubUug its way around social media]], combining footage from Film/ANewHope ''Film/ANewHope'' where Obi-Wan talks to Luke about his father Anakin, and showing Anakin's fall in Film/RevengeOfTheSith. ''Film/RevengeOfTheSith''. It's evident that Alex Guinness Creator/AlexGuinness had no idea the actual history there, but his performance is nuanced enough with a tint of sadness that the edited video is heartbreaking.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Though modern usage is not exclusively in this manner, it is useful for cases where the "actor" is inanimate. In ''[[TwoThousandOneASpaceOdyssey 2001: A Space Odyssey]]'', HAL "displays" a broad range of emotions through being an unreadable red camera lens.

to:

* Though modern usage is not exclusively in this manner, it is useful for cases where the "actor" is inanimate. In ''[[TwoThousandOneASpaceOdyssey 2001: A Space Odyssey]]'', ''Film/TwoThousandOneASpaceOdyssey'', HAL "displays" a broad range of emotions through being an unreadable red camera lens.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* An edited Franchise/StarWars video made [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hN74bOubUug its way around social media]], combining footage from Film/ANewHope where Obi-Wan talks to Luke about his father Anakin, and showing Anakin's fall in Film/RevengeOfTheSith. It's evident that Alex Guinness had no idea the actual history there, but his performance is nuanced enough with a tint of sadness that the edited video is heartbreaking.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Most films from the Soviet era prior to the forced implementation of 'Soviet Realism' in cinema by Stalin. These include venerable classics like ''Film/TheBattleshipPotemkin'' and ''Film/ManWithAMovieCamera''

to:

* Most films from the Soviet era prior to the forced implementation of 'Soviet Realism' in cinema by Stalin. These include venerable classics like ''Film/TheBattleshipPotemkin'' and ''Film/ManWithAMovieCamera''''Film/ManWithAMovieCamera''.



* ''Film/RearWindow'' extensively uses this trope to spend whole scenes switching back and forth between Jimmy Stewart and what he sees through his window. In one sequence he stares out his window as the focus of the scene switches between several of his neighbors who have very different emotions in their scenarios. His only reaction is to ultimately raise his glass to one of them. Scramble the different window scenes, and the tone changes greatly. Stewart actually complained that Hitchcock used the editing of the film in general to create a different performance than the one that was given. This was a common complaint of the actors: that Hitchcock wouldn't let them act.
* ''ComicBook/TomStrong'' makes it work in a comic book, with Pneuman, a robot who we're ''expressively told'' has the emotional capacity of a tea kettle, who still manages to communicate powerful emotion using a face with no moving parts, shown from the right angles in the right light.

to:

* ''Film/RearWindow'' extensively uses this trope to spend whole scenes switching back and forth between Jimmy Stewart Creator/JimmyStewart and what he sees through his window. In one sequence he stares out his window as the focus of the scene switches between several of his neighbors who have very different emotions in their scenarios. His only reaction is to ultimately raise his glass to one of them. Scramble the different window scenes, and the tone changes greatly. Stewart actually complained that Hitchcock Creator/AlfredHitchcock used the editing of the film in general to create a different performance than the one that was given. This was a common complaint of the actors: that Hitchcock wouldn't let them act.
* ''ComicBook/TomStrong'' makes it work in a comic book, with Pneuman, a robot who we're ''expressively ''expressly told'' has the emotional capacity of a tea kettle, who still manages to communicate powerful emotion using a face with no moving parts, shown from the right angles in the right light.



----

to:

----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Often used in many old video games. With limited animations and poses, and developers unwilling to make more than absolutely necessary, games often employed the same poses and animations in different situations to convey a wide range of emotions. For example, a sprite usually displayed for when a character takes damage in battle could be used to display shock at something surprising, or perhaps to show the character is in free-fall.
** A SpriteComic works on the same principal, except this time, the only purpose the sprites serve is to tell the story. You'd be surprised at how much mileage you can get out of 5 or so poses.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''RearWindow'' extensively uses this trope to spend whole scenes switching back and forth between Jimmy Stewart and what he sees through his window. In one sequence he stares out his window as the focus of the scene switches between several of his neighbors who have very different emotions in their scenarios. His only reaction is to ultimately raise his glass to one of them. Scramble the different window scenes, and the tone changes greatly. Stewart actually complained that Hitchcock used the editing of the film in general to create a different performance than the one that was given. This was a common complaint of the actors: that Hitchcock wouldn't let them act.

to:

* ''RearWindow'' ''Film/RearWindow'' extensively uses this trope to spend whole scenes switching back and forth between Jimmy Stewart and what he sees through his window. In one sequence he stares out his window as the focus of the scene switches between several of his neighbors who have very different emotions in their scenarios. His only reaction is to ultimately raise his glass to one of them. Scramble the different window scenes, and the tone changes greatly. Stewart actually complained that Hitchcock used the editing of the film in general to create a different performance than the one that was given. This was a common complaint of the actors: that Hitchcock wouldn't let them act.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Used frequently in ''Webcomic/{{Digger}}'' with the Statue of Ganesh, who contrives to be very expressive for a stone statue in much the same way as the ''TomStrong'' example above.

to:

* Used frequently in ''Webcomic/{{Digger}}'' with the Statue of Ganesh, who contrives to be very expressive for a stone statue in much the same way as the ''TomStrong'' ''Tom Strong'' example above.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''TomStrong'' makes it work in a comic book, with Pneuman, a robot who we're ''expressively told'' has the emotional capacity of a tea kettle, who still manages to communicate powerful emotion using a face with no moving parts, shown from the right angles in the right light.

to:

* ''TomStrong'' ''ComicBook/TomStrong'' makes it work in a comic book, with Pneuman, a robot who we're ''expressively told'' has the emotional capacity of a tea kettle, who still manages to communicate powerful emotion using a face with no moving parts, shown from the right angles in the right light.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
That\'s not what the Kuleshov Effect is. The effect explicitly applies only to editing.


* The classic "Demon in a Bottle" issue of ''IronMan'' (#128) managed to make the main character's helmet look tormented by showing it at a particular [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Iron_Man_128.jpg angle]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Used frequently in ''Webcomic/{{Digger}}'' with the Statue of Ganesh, who contrives to be very expressive for a stone statue in much the same way as the ''TomStrong'' example above.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
The original implied that all Machinima uses games that hide the characters\' faces.


* {{Machinima}} takes advantage of this trope due to the inability to pose the characters' faces, or even see their faces at all.

to:

* {{Machinima}} takes advantage of this trope due to the inability to pose the characters' faces, or even (in some cases) see their faces at all.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Used in the twelfth episode of MysteryScienceTheatre3000's fifth season; the scene is a comical homage to the lip-reading scene from ''[[TwoThousandOneASpaceOdyssey 2001: A Space Odyssey,]]'' with Gypsy taking the place of Hal.

to:

* Used in the twelfth episode of MysteryScienceTheatre3000's ''Series/MysteryScienceTheater3000'''s fifth season; the scene is a comical homage to the lip-reading scene from ''[[TwoThousandOneASpaceOdyssey 2001: A Space Odyssey,]]'' ''Film/TwoThousandOneASpaceOdyssey'', with Gypsy taking the place of Hal.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Used in the twelfth episode of MysteryScienceTheatre3000's fifth season; the scene is a comical homage to the lip-reading scene from ''[[TwoThousandOneASpaceOdyssey 2001: A Space Odyssey,]]'' with Gypsy taking the place of Hal.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Most films from the Soviet era prior to the forced implementation of 'Soviet Realism' in cinema by Stalin. These include venerable classics like ''The Battleship Potemkin'' and ''The Man with a Movie Camera''

to:

* Most films from the Soviet era prior to the forced implementation of 'Soviet Realism' in cinema by Stalin. These include venerable classics like ''The Battleship Potemkin'' ''Film/TheBattleshipPotemkin'' and ''The Man with a Movie Camera''''Film/ManWithAMovieCamera''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

According to Kuleshov, this came into being largely by necessity. Soviet cinema in its early days was chronically cash-strapped. Kuleshov and other early directors trained themselves by reediting existing films, mostly movies produced in the Tsarist era. Kuleshov found that filmmakers could create an entirely new story by reordering scenes and shots, noticing this could in turn alter an audience's reaction.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The infamous shower scene from ''Film/{{Psycho}}'' is often used as an example of this trope. After watching it, everyone immediately understands that Janet Leigh's character has been stabbed to death, but if you slow it down, only three frames actually show a knife piercing flesh (this is fast enough to count as subliminal messaging). The audience's understanding of what has taken place comes entirely from the way the images and sound are arranged, not from the actual content.

to:

* The infamous famous shower scene from ''Film/{{Psycho}}'' is often used as an example of this trope. After watching it, everyone immediately understands that Janet Leigh's character has been stabbed to death, but if you slow it down, only three frames actually show a knife piercing flesh (this is fast enough to count as subliminal messaging). The audience's understanding of what has taken place comes entirely from the way the images and sound are arranged, not from the actual content.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* The classic "Demon in a Bottle" issue of ''IronMan'' (#128) managed to make the main character's helmet look tormented by showing it at a particular [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Iron_Man_128.jpg angle]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Sorry, but the Kuleshov Effect is about creating meaning through cuts and edits, not characterization through great voice acting.


* C-3PO in the ''StarWars'' films, most notably ''ANewHope'' which has his biggest role. His face is deliberately completely neutral and expressionless, and Anthony Daniels doesn't over-emote with his body to compensate; but he manages to be a convincing [[TheWoobie Woobie]]. R2-D2 is even more difficult, with nothing resembling a face and virtually no movement other than rolling around. Yet between Daniels' vocal performance and Ben Burtt's synthesis of R2's "voice", they manage to carry the original movie — we barely even see the human characters in the first reel. Darth Vader counts too, for the same reason. Helps if you're voiced by Creator/JamesEarlJones.

Changed: 91

Removed: 106

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* C-3PO in the ''StarWars'' films, most notably ''ANewHope'' which has his biggest role. His face is deliberately completely neutral and expressionless, and Anthony Daniels doesn't over-emote with his body to compensate; but he manages to be a convincing [[TheWoobie Woobie]]. R2-D2 is even more difficult, with nothing resembling a face and virtually no movement other than rolling around. Yet between Daniels' vocal performance and Ben Burtt's synthesis of R2's "voice", they manage to carry the original movie — we barely even see the human characters in the first reel.
** Darth Vader arguably counts too, for the same reason. Helps if you're voiced by Creator/JamesEarlJones.

to:

* C-3PO in the ''StarWars'' films, most notably ''ANewHope'' which has his biggest role. His face is deliberately completely neutral and expressionless, and Anthony Daniels doesn't over-emote with his body to compensate; but he manages to be a convincing [[TheWoobie Woobie]]. R2-D2 is even more difficult, with nothing resembling a face and virtually no movement other than rolling around. Yet between Daniels' vocal performance and Ben Burtt's synthesis of R2's "voice", they manage to carry the original movie — we barely even see the human characters in the first reel.
**
reel. Darth Vader arguably counts too, for the same reason. Helps if you're voiced by Creator/JamesEarlJones.

Changed: 227

Removed: 229

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''RearWindow'' extensively uses this trope to spend whole scenes switching back and forth between Jimmy Stewart and what he sees through his window. In one sequence he stares out his window as the focus of the scene switches between several of his neighbors who have very different emotions in their scenarios. His only reaction is to ultimately raise his glass to one of them. Scramble the different window scenes, and the tone changes greatly.
** Stewart actually complained that Hitchcock used the editing of the film in general to create a different performance than the one that was given. This was a common complaint of the actors: that Hitchcock wouldn't let them act.

to:

* ''RearWindow'' extensively uses this trope to spend whole scenes switching back and forth between Jimmy Stewart and what he sees through his window. In one sequence he stares out his window as the focus of the scene switches between several of his neighbors who have very different emotions in their scenarios. His only reaction is to ultimately raise his glass to one of them. Scramble the different window scenes, and the tone changes greatly.
**
greatly. Stewart actually complained that Hitchcock used the editing of the film in general to create a different performance than the one that was given. This was a common complaint of the actors: that Hitchcock wouldn't let them act.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''TomStrong'' makes it work in a comic book, with Pneuman, a robot who we're ''expressively told'' has the emotional capacity of a tea kettle, who still manages to communicate powerful emotion using a face with no moving parts, shown from the right angles in the right light.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Darth Vader arguably counts too, for the same reason. Helps if you're voiced by JamesEarlJones.

to:

** Darth Vader arguably counts too, for the same reason. Helps if you're voiced by JamesEarlJones.Creator/JamesEarlJones.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Stewart actually complained that Hitchcock used the editing of the film in general to create a different performance than the one that was given.

to:

** Stewart actually complained that Hitchcock used the editing of the film in general to create a different performance than the one that was given. This was a common complaint of the actors: that Hitchcock wouldn't let them act.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The infamous shower scene from ''Film/{{Psycho}}'' is often used as an example of this trope. After watching it, everyone immediately understands that Janet Leigh's character has been stabbed to death, but if you slow it down, only three frames actually show a knife piercing human flesh (this is fast enough to count as subliminal messaging). The audience's understanding of what has taken place comes entirely from the way the images and sound are arranged, not from the actual content.

to:

* The infamous shower scene from ''Film/{{Psycho}}'' is often used as an example of this trope. After watching it, everyone immediately understands that Janet Leigh's character has been stabbed to death, but if you slow it down, only three frames actually show a knife piercing human flesh (this is fast enough to count as subliminal messaging). The audience's understanding of what has taken place comes entirely from the way the images and sound are arranged, not from the actual content.

Changed: 6

Removed: 16

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Namespace Fix!+


More generally, the Kuleshov Effect is the basis of Soviet montage cinema, and is used in many many films since. The idea is that, by editing different things together, it is possible to create meanings that didn't exist in either of the images put together - constructing 'sentences' and 'texts' out of film.

to:

More generally, the Kuleshov Effect is the basis of Soviet montage cinema, and is used in many many films since. The idea is that, by editing different things together, it is possible to create meanings that didn't exist in either of the images put together - constructing 'sentences' and 'texts' out of film.



* The infamous shower scene from ''{{Psycho}}'' is often used as an example of this trope. After watching it, everyone immediately understands that Janet Leigh's character has been stabbed to death, but if you slow it down, only three frames actually show a knife piercing human flesh (this is fast enough to count as subliminal messaging). The audience's understanding of what has taken place comes entirely from the way the images and sound are arranged, not from the actual content.

to:

* The infamous shower scene from ''{{Psycho}}'' ''Film/{{Psycho}}'' is often used as an example of this trope. After watching it, everyone immediately understands that Janet Leigh's character has been stabbed to death, but if you slow it down, only three frames actually show a knife piercing human flesh (this is fast enough to count as subliminal messaging). The audience's understanding of what has taken place comes entirely from the way the images and sound are arranged, not from the actual content.



<<|FilmTropes|>>
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


More generally, the Kuleshov Effect is the basis of Soviet montage cinema, and is used in many many films since. The idea is that, by editing different things together, it is possible to create meanings that didn't exist in either of the images put together - constructing 'sentences' and 'texts' out of film. The more general application of these principles is known as DialecticMontage or SovietMontageTheory.

to:

More generally, the Kuleshov Effect is the basis of Soviet montage cinema, and is used in many many films since. The idea is that, by editing different things together, it is possible to create meanings that didn't exist in either of the images put together - constructing 'sentences' and 'texts' out of film. The more general application of these principles is known as DialecticMontage or SovietMontageTheory.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* The infamous shower scene from ''{{Psycho}}'' is often used as an example of this trope. After watching it, everyone immediately understands that Janet Leigh's character has been stabbed to death, but if you slow it down, only three frames actually show a knife piercing human flesh (this is fast enough to count as subliminal messaging). The audience's understanding of what has taken place comes entirely from the way the images and sound are arranged, not from the actual content.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* C-3PO in the ''StarWars'' films, most notably ''ANewHope'' which has his biggest role. His face is deliberately completely neutral and expressionless, and Anthony Daniels doesn't over-emote with his body to compensate; but he manages to be a convincing [[TheWoobie Woobie]]. R2-D2 is even more difficult, with nothing resembling a face and virtually no movement other than rolling around. Yet between Daniels' vocal performance and Ben Burtt's synthesis of R2's "voice", they manage to carry the original movie — we barely even see the human characters in the first reel.
** Darth Vader arguably counts too, for the same reason. Helps if you're voiced by JamesEarlJones.

Top