Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
sorry - misread what this trope was. mostly ignore my last edit - but not entirely ignore, as the given definition of transmed was still incorrect
Changed line(s) 105 (click to see context) from:
* SupernaturallyValidatedTransPerson: Effectively exists as a counter to the idea that a trans person isn't a "real" member of their gender, although it can also come across as transphobic when it's handled poorly (for example if it comes across as assimilationist - implying that being cis is by default preferable and that gender diversity should be eradicated for not fitting into our current defintion rather than actually having to alter the definition in the fact of new facts as is, even apart from the transphobic implications in this case, generally considered proper in science anyway - or enforces a gender binary -- which excludes nonbinary folk, even if it is somewhat accepting of binary trans people).
to:
* SupernaturallyValidatedTransPerson: Effectively exists as a counter to the idea that a trans person isn't a "real" member of their gender, although it can also come across as transphobic when it's handled poorly (for example if it comes across as assimilationist - implying that being cis is by default preferable and that gender diversity should be eradicated for not fitting into our current defintion rather than actually having to alter the definition in the fact of new facts as is, even apart from the transphobic implications in this case, generally considered proper in science anyway - assimilationist, transmedicalist, or enforces a gender binary -- which excludes nonbinary folk, even if it is somewhat accepting of binary trans people).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
I'm trans and this isn't the correct definition of transmedicalism. Transmedicalism isn't "trans people need to take medication to be real", but almost the opposite view - that medication should only be given as a very last resort AFTER the individual has been proven "really trans", and even then should be treated as more the next best treatment since unfortunately conversion therapy doesn't work. Most transmeds would choose a form of conversion therapy that actually worked over supernatural body modification. This is more assimilationist than transmedicalist. Both are bad views, but they are different, and indeed in many cases opposite in the specifics of what they believe (though the broad strokes of their philosophies are indeed very similar)
Changed line(s) 105 (click to see context) from:
* SupernaturallyValidatedTransPerson: Effectively exists as a counter to the idea that a trans person isn't a "real" member of their gender, although it can also come across as transphobic when it's handled poorly (for example if it conforms to transmedicalist[[note]]A "philosophy" within the trans community that older, heavily medicalised definitions of trans people are the only way someone can be trans[[/note]] or enforces a gender binary -- which excludes nonbinary folk, even if it is somewhat accepting of binary trans people).
to:
* SupernaturallyValidatedTransPerson: Effectively exists as a counter to the idea that a trans person isn't a "real" member of their gender, although it can also come across as transphobic when it's handled poorly (for example if it conforms to transmedicalist[[note]]A "philosophy" within the trans community comes across as assimilationist - implying that older, heavily medicalised definitions of trans people are being cis is by default preferable and that gender diversity should be eradicated for not fitting into our current defintion rather than actually having to alter the only way someone can be trans[[/note]] definition in the fact of new facts as is, even apart from the transphobic implications in this case, generally considered proper in science anyway - or enforces a gender binary -- which excludes nonbinary folk, even if it is somewhat accepting of binary trans people).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* ShameAccusation: One person in a queer relationship might feel like their partner is ashamed of them if they aren't as open as about their relationship as they might want to due to societal prejudice in form or another, whether it's hostile family members or full-on legal discrimination.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Trope was cut/disambiguated due to cleanup
Changed line(s) 108 (click to see context) from:
* TransgenderFetishization: A gender-nonconforming character is portrayed as hypersexualized or is used for more candid fanservice than other characters. Reinforces the stigma that non-gender-conforming people are inherently a sexual topic or only matter in relation to how attracted/disgusted cis people are.
to:
* TransgenderFetishization: A TransEqualsHypersexual: Transgender or gender-nonconforming character is portrayed as hypersexualized or is used for more candid fanservice than other characters. Reinforces the stigma that non-gender-conforming people characters are inherently a depicted as having an ExtremeLibido, no sexual topic boundaries, [[FetishesAreWeird bizarre kinks]], or only matter in relation to how attracted/disgusted cis people are.otherwise over-the-top sexual proclivities.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
changing the order of the items to make statement's meaning more clear (originally wrote it)
Changed line(s) 120 (click to see context) from:
* CelibateEccentricGenius: Asexual and aromatic behavior are depicted as going hand in hand with lack of interest in ''platonic'' socializing, high intelligence and interest in intellectually stimulating activities. The personalities of real-life asexuals and aromatics are much more diverse than that. The fact that asexuality and aromanticism don't always overlap mean that even partner-seeking socializing can still be engaged in.
to:
* CelibateEccentricGenius: Asexual and aromatic behavior are depicted as going hand in hand with high intelligence, interest in intellectually stimulating activities and lack of interest in ''platonic'' socializing, high intelligence and interest in intellectually stimulating activities.socializing. The personalities of real-life asexuals and aromatics are much more diverse than that. The fact that asexuality and aromanticism don't always overlap mean that even partner-seeking socializing can still be engaged in.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 8,9 (click to see context) from:
* '''Criminality/Evil/Decay:''' Associating queer people by definition with one or more of these undesirable traits. A similar association is sometimes made between black people and these same traits.
to:
* '''Criminality/Evil/Decay:''' Associating queer people by definition with one Queer characters are depicted as evil or more of these undesirable traits. A similar association in otherwise negative lights, implying that there is sometimes made a causal link between black people their queerness and these same traits.
their immorality.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* SexualDevianceIsEvil: A catch-all for tropes where nonstandard sexual behavior (which generally encompasses LGBTQIA+) is conflated with evil or villainous characters.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 129 (click to see context) from:
* SexlessMarriage: If a married couple isn't having sex in fiction, it frequently means one of the following: they don't love each other anymore, it's a MarriageOfConvenience in the first place, the couple is unable/unwilling to sleep in the same bed or at the same time for whatever reason or at least one half is in a situation that prevents them from having sex even if they wanted to. As a result, a marriage in which the pair is having sex is portrayed as inherently going better than one in which the couple isn't, leading to a real-life assumption that marriages in which at least one partner is asexual are unhappy.
to:
* SexlessMarriage: If a married couple isn't having sex in fiction, it frequently means one of the following: they don't love each other anymore, it's a MarriageOfConvenience in the first place, the couple is unable/unwilling to sleep in the same bed or at the same time for whatever reason or at least one half is in a situation that prevents them from having sex even if they wanted to. As a result, a marriage in which the pair couple is having sex is portrayed as inherently going better than one in which the couple isn't, leading to a real-life assumption that marriages in which at least one partner is asexual are unhappy.never as happy as those involving two allosexual people who regularly have sex.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 129 (click to see context) from:
* SexlessMarriage: If a married couple isn't having sex in fiction, it frequently means one of the following: they don't love each other anymore, it's a MarriageOfConvenience in the first place, the couple is unable/unwilling to sleep in the same bed or at the same time for whatever reason or at least one half is in a situation that prevents them from having sex even if they wanted to. As a result, the lack of sex is all too frequently potrayed as an inherently negative thing in a marriage, rather than something it can work perfectly fine without (outside of explicit cases of ChastityCouple).
to:
* SexlessMarriage: If a married couple isn't having sex in fiction, it frequently means one of the following: they don't love each other anymore, it's a MarriageOfConvenience in the first place, the couple is unable/unwilling to sleep in the same bed or at the same time for whatever reason or at least one half is in a situation that prevents them from having sex even if they wanted to. As a result, a marriage in which the lack of pair is having sex is all too frequently potrayed portrayed as an inherently negative thing in a marriage, rather going better than something it can work perfectly fine without (outside of explicit cases of ChastityCouple).one in which the couple isn't, leading to a real-life assumption that marriages in which at least one partner is asexual are unhappy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 129 (click to see context) from:
* SexlessMarriage: If a married couple isn't having sex in fiction, it frequently means one of the following: they don't love each other anymore, it's a MarriageOfConvenience in the first place, the couple is unable/unwilling to sleep in the same bed or at the same time for whatever reason or at least one half is in a situation that prevents them from having sex even if they wanted to.
to:
* SexlessMarriage: If a married couple isn't having sex in fiction, it frequently means one of the following: they don't love each other anymore, it's a MarriageOfConvenience in the first place, the couple is unable/unwilling to sleep in the same bed or at the same time for whatever reason or at least one half is in a situation that prevents them from having sex even if they wanted to. As a result, the lack of sex is all too frequently potrayed as an inherently negative thing in a marriage, rather than something it can work perfectly fine without (outside of explicit cases of ChastityCouple).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* SexlessMarriage: If a married couple isn't having sex in fiction, it frequently means one of the following: they don't love each other anymore, it's a MarriageOfConvenience in the first place, the couple is unable/unwilling to sleep in the same bed or at the same time for whatever reason or at least one half is in a situation that prevents them from having sex even if they wanted to.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Aegosexuality and Perverse Sexual Lust are not the same thing.
Deleted line(s) 127 (click to see context) :
* PerverseSexualLust: Sexual attraction to a fictional character is worse than being sexually attracted to a real person, making out aegosexuals and the like to be inherently perverted for their attraction.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Rewriting.
Changed line(s) 127 (click to see context) from:
* PervverseSexualLust: Just calling aegosexuals "perverse" when allos do much grosser stuff than crush on a well-drawn character with a great personality is pretty mean-spirited.
to:
* PervverseSexualLust: Just calling PerverseSexualLust: Sexual attraction to a fictional character is worse than being sexually attracted to a real person, making out aegosexuals "perverse" when allos do much grosser stuff than crush on a well-drawn character with a great personality is pretty mean-spirited.and the like to be inherently perverted for their attraction.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* PervverseSexualLust: Just calling aegosexuals "perverse" when allos do much grosser stuff than crush on a well-drawn character with a great personality is pretty mean-spirited.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
alphabetizing since articles are ignored
Deleted line(s) 117 (click to see context) :
* AManIsAlwaysEager: Masculinity is based on how much a man wants sex. The implication is that if a man isn't constantly seeking out sex (often to an extent that most allosexual men don't reach), that's because there's something wrong with him. In addition to being hateful to asexual men, it is derived from a sexist idea that sex is something men are compelled to try to ''take'' from women, with the manliest men being the ones who are most successful at it, and less successful men being worthy of hatred and mockery.
Added DiffLines:
* AManIsAlwaysEager: Masculinity is based on how much a man wants sex. The implication is that if a man isn't constantly seeking out sex (often to an extent that most allosexual men don't reach), that's because there's something wrong with him. In addition to being hateful to asexual men, it is derived from a sexist idea that sex is something men are compelled to try to ''take'' from women, with the manliest men being the ones who are most successful at it, and less successful men being worthy of hatred and mockery.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* TokenRomance: Insistence on tacking a romantic subplot onto every story, regardless of how well it can be executed or how it fits the setting or genre, sends a message to aromantic people that if they don't have a love interest, their story is not one worth telling.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Deleted line(s) 85 (click to see context) :
* AnythingThatMoves: When applied to bisexuals, this presumes that because they are interested in ''some'' members of both sexes, they're interested in ''all'' members of both sexes, although "bisexual" is not equivalent to "promiscuous".
Changed line(s) 87 (click to see context) from:
* DepravedBisexual: If they're having gay sex, and gay sex is among the worst sins on the calendar, they'll stick at nothing. [[AnythingThatMoves The presumed promiscuity of bisexuals]] turns up the volume on this one.
to:
* DepravedBisexual: If they're having gay sex, and gay sex is among the worst sins on the calendar, they'll stick at nothing. [[AnythingThatMoves The presumed promiscuity of bisexuals]] bisexuals turns up the volume on this one.
