Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / CantArgueWithElves

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Played with by Sera in ''Inquisition'', a city elf with [[InternalizedCategorism internalized racism]] who sees all "elfy" elves as automatically haughty bigots while only "non-elfy" elves like her can be accepting and open-minded... and she's framed as indisputably correct. The [[PlayerCharacter Inquisitor]] can never meaningfully counter-argue, and she [[StaticCharacter never changes her stance on it]] (thought becomes less mean-spirited about it in ''Trespasser''). While Solas is also rather bigoted toward most modern elves (particularly the Dalish) due to [[BornInTheWrongCentury prefering ancient Elvhen history and culture]], a Dalish Inquisitor who gains high RelationshipValues can show him there's some value in Dalish culture, while a Low Approval Inquisitor can call him out on his bigoted attitude and [[HypocrisyNod get a grudging agreement]]. Sera gives no such leeway, and in fact [[spoiler:will break up with a romanced Dalish Inquisitor who refuses to agree the elven gods are fake]], and Sera is framed as the victim for it. Also, most of Sera's bigoted and outright ''mean-spirited'' statement about elves ends up being proven correct. ([[spoiler:Like the elven gods being fake, elves being responsible for their own downfall rather than humans, the elven servants in ''Trespasser'' being suspicious, and so on]]).

to:

** Played with by Sera in ''Inquisition'', a city elf with [[InternalizedCategorism internalized racism]] who sees all "elfy" elves as automatically haughty bigots while only "non-elfy" elves like her can be accepting and open-minded... and she's framed as indisputably correct. open-minded. The [[PlayerCharacter Inquisitor]] can never meaningfully counter-argue, and she [[StaticCharacter never changes her stance on it]] (thought (though becomes less mean-spirited about it in ''Trespasser''). While Solas is also rather bigoted toward most modern elves (particularly the Dalish) due to [[BornInTheWrongCentury prefering ancient Elvhen history and culture]], a Dalish Inquisitor who gains high RelationshipValues can show him there's some value in Dalish culture, while a Low Approval Inquisitor can call him out on his bigoted attitude and [[HypocrisyNod get a grudging agreement]]. Sera gives no such leeway, and in fact [[spoiler:will break up with a romanced Dalish Inquisitor who refuses to agree the elven gods are fake]], and Sera is framed as the victim for it.fake]]. Also, most of Sera's bigoted and outright ''mean-spirited'' statement about elves ends up being proven correct. ([[spoiler:Like the elven gods being fake, elves being responsible for their own downfall rather than humans, the elven servants in ''Trespasser'' being suspicious, and so on]]).

Changed: 1542

Removed: 547

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Marvels's message focuses more on the public's atitude towards superheroes specifically, not just superhumans. Thus, I've made a few changes to the example to better illustrate this.


This species is [[SuperiorSpecies better than you - and just about whatever is not them]]. They are taller, thinner, prettier, more graceful, better-read, more intelligent, more environmentally conscious, more socially progressive, less aggressive or confrontational (while still being fearsome warriors), and better craftspeople, too.

to:

This species is [[SuperiorSpecies better than you - and just about whatever is not them]]. They are taller, thinner, prettier, more graceful, better-read, more intelligent, more environmentally conscious, more socially progressive, less aggressive or confrontational (while still being fearsome warriors), and better craftspeople, too.



* The mini-series ''ComicBook/{{Marvels}}'' takes the moral that the reason the baseline human population of the Marvelverse resents and protests against its superhuman members is that they're ''jealous'' of their inherent nobility and self-sacrifice, rather than the perfectly understandable fear of having what amounts to physical gods brawling in the street. They also apparently fear being "replaced" by mutants, despite the fact that every human being on Earth is already a mutant, and the only difference is whether or not their X-Gene is activated.
** The "jealousy over inherent moral superiority" thing gets rather ridiculous once the various {{Rogues Galler|y}}ies – which demonstrate quite clearly that "noble" superhumans are quite outnumbered by the less-than-noble ones.
* Similarly the Inhumans are often written as culturally posturing. As an isolationist civilization with similar powers to mutants, uplifted by advanced alien technology centuries before others, they're short on patience with humanity. Even as MainCharacters of their titles and allies in others, they're [[UnintentionallyUnsympathetic abrasively standoffish]]. This at least appears cultural, as Inhumans inherited this attitude from the imperialistic and xenophobic Kree and Inhumans raised outside of their culture don't act nearly as superior.

to:

* The mini-series ''ComicBook/{{Marvels}}'' In ''ComicBook/{{Marvels}}'', Phil Sheldon eventually takes the moral position that the reason the baseline human population of the Marvelverse [[AllOfTheOtherReindeer resents and protests against its superhuman members against]] [[HeroWithBadPublicity the superheroes protecting them]] is that they're ''jealous'' of their inherent nobility and self-sacrifice, rather than the perfectly comparatively understandable fear of having what amounts to physical gods [[DestructiveSavior brawling in the street. They street]]. This position is [[BrokenAesop even more odd]] considering that the series specifically shows Namor the ComicBook/SubMariner's [[HeelFaceRevolvingDoor mercurial attitude towards humans]] and how that influenced public distrust of superheroes -- and that [[LetsYouAndHimFight a battle between Namor and the Human Torch]] was what led to the loss of Phil's eye in the first place. Anti-mutant prejudice is also apparently portrayed as an irrational fear of being [[ClashOfEvolutionaryLevels "replaced" by mutants, a posthuman race]], despite the fact that every human being on Earth is already existence of [[BewareTheSuperman criminal mutants]] providing a mutant, and the only difference is whether or not their X-Gene is activated.
** The "jealousy over inherent moral superiority" thing gets rather ridiculous once the various {{Rogues Galler|y}}ies – which demonstrate quite clearly that "noble" superhumans are quite outnumbered by the less-than-noble ones.
much clearer reason for anti-mutant sentiment.
* Similarly the Inhumans Similarly, ComicBook/TheInhumans are often written as culturally posturing. As an isolationist civilization with similar powers to mutants, uplifted by advanced alien technology centuries before others, they're short on patience with humanity. Even as MainCharacters of their titles and allies in others, they're [[UnintentionallyUnsympathetic abrasively standoffish]]. This at least appears cultural, as Inhumans inherited this attitude from the imperialistic and xenophobic Kree and Inhumans raised outside of their culture don't act nearly as superior.



* In the French Comic Book series [[ComicBook/ElfesEtNains Elfes]], the White Elves are presented as better in every way to humans, having a peaceful civilization yet accomplished soldiers, being wiser as they do not exploit the world of Arran only for their own profit and do not kill each other for petty material gains. The third volumes notably portrays Fall, a White Elf, trusting a human and bringing him to the Isles of the White Elves as a tragic mistake leading to a massacre of the Elves.

to:

* In the French Comic Book series [[ComicBook/ElfesEtNains Elfes]], ''ComicBook/ElfesEtNains'', the White Elves are presented as better in every way to humans, having a peaceful civilization yet accomplished soldiers, being wiser as they do not exploit the world of Arran only for their own profit and do not kill each other for petty material gains. The third volumes notably portrays Fall, a White Elf, trusting a human and bringing him to the Isles of the White Elves as a tragic mistake leading to a massacre of the Elves.



* Deconstructed in the ''WesternAnimation/MyLittlePonyFriendshipIsMagic'' [[FanficRecs/MyLittlePonyFriendshipIsMagicHumans "Human" fic]], ''[[http://www.fanfiction.net/s/7721108/1/ What Separates]]''. Twilight initially takes the "elf" role after the arrival of a human soldier from TwentyMinutesIntoTheFuture, but over time realizes that 1) some of the stated flaws of humanity are based on unfair assumptions or generalizations; and 2) the Ponies can live a more idyllic lifestyle because they have magic and, with that, a much greater degree of control over their environment.

to:

* Deconstructed {{Deconstructed|Trope}} in the ''WesternAnimation/MyLittlePonyFriendshipIsMagic'' [[FanficRecs/MyLittlePonyFriendshipIsMagicHumans "Human" fic]], ''[[http://www.fanfiction.net/s/7721108/1/ What Separates]]''. Twilight initially takes the "elf" role after the arrival of a human soldier from TwentyMinutesIntoTheFuture, but over time realizes that 1) some of the stated flaws of humanity are based on unfair assumptions or generalizations; and 2) the Ponies can live a more idyllic lifestyle because they have magic and, with that, a much greater degree of control over their environment.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Caesar's Legion from ''VideoGame/FalloutNewVegas'' has some issues with this. Much like with the examples regarding Orleasian society and Vivienne in the ''Dragon Age'' entries above, despite the absolutely ''horrifying'' things the Legion does (such as the slavery, sexism, executing detractors, and raping and pillaging that would make Conan the Barbarian blush to name ''a few'') you never get a chance to actually counter-argue these points with Caesar himself, with the best excuse being that it's all "[[UtopiaJustifiesTheMeans for the greater good]]."

to:

* Caesar's Legion from ''VideoGame/FalloutNewVegas'' has some issues with this. Much like with the examples regarding Orleasian society and Vivienne in the ''Dragon Age'' entries above, despite the absolutely ''horrifying'' things the Legion does (such as the slavery, sexism, executing detractors, and raping and pillaging that would make Conan the Barbarian blush to name ''a few'') you never get a chance to actually counter-argue these points with Caesar himself, with the best excuse being that it's all "[[UtopiaJustifiesTheMeans for the greater good]]." Despite all of this, ''they're'' the ones who consider the other factions of the wastelands as inferior, seeing organized militaries like the New California Republic or isolationist tech-hoarders like the Brotherhood of Steel as the "savages" and "profligates", despite the fact that neither of those factions commit atrocities at ''nearly'' the same level as the Legion do on a regular basis.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Film/LadyInTheWater'': The prologue establishes that HumansAreBastards who came to refuse to take counsel from [[OurMermaidsAreDifferent narfs]], a fantastic race that lives in the water, and thus succumb to selfish desires and endlessly war among themselves.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


This species is [[SuperiorSpecies better than you]]. They are taller, thinner, prettier, more graceful, better-read, more intelligent, more environmentally conscious, more socially progressive, less aggressive or confrontational (while still being fearsome warriors), and better craftspeople, too.

to:

This species is [[SuperiorSpecies better than you]].you - and just about whatever is not them]]. They are taller, thinner, prettier, more graceful, better-read, more intelligent, more environmentally conscious, more socially progressive, less aggressive or confrontational (while still being fearsome warriors), and better craftspeople, too.



* Seen in the ''Film/TheLordOfTheRings'' movies, particularly in Elrond, who almost despises humans as foolish and weak. Elrond's problem with humans is more personal than an expression of elven hauteur. He's still angry at humans -- in the person of Isildur -- for failing to throw the One Ring into Mount Doom when they (he) had the chance. Since that failure led directly to the problems that were being discussed at that very moment, his harsh words may have been more a moment of pique than anything else. His daughter wanting to leave her entire family to stay with a human man probably plays a big part in this. Most other elves seem far more relaxed about it. Elrond tends to be quite a bit more sullen and openly angry than the usual "[[SmugSnake preeningly superior haughtiness]]" that this trope usually indicates, however.

to:

* Seen in the ''Film/TheLordOfTheRings'' movies, particularly in Elrond, who almost despises humans as foolish and mentally weak. Elrond's problem with humans is more personal than an expression of elven hauteur. He's still angry at humans -- in the person of Isildur -- for failing to throw the One Ring into Mount Doom when they (he) had the chance. Since that failure led directly to the problems that were being discussed at that very moment, his harsh words may have been more a moment of pique than anything else. His daughter wanting to leave her entire family to stay with a human man probably plays a big part in this. Most other elves seem far more relaxed about it. Elrond tends to be quite a bit more sullen and openly angry than the usual "[[SmugSnake preeningly superior haughtiness]]" that this trope usually indicates, however.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* By [[Creator/JimButcher the same author]], Kitai of the Marat in ''Literature/CodexAlera'' often talks about the shortcomings of the human Alerans, but she avoids the usual problems of this trope because: she herself is a likeable and sympathetic character, her exclamations of "_____ is/are insane!" are usually a RunningGag played for comic effect, her observations take the form of "your people are crazy" rather than "my people are awesome" and her criticisms are of social institutions that are either harmlessly ridiculous (the prudishness about nudity and sex) or clearly immoral (slavery), so she has a point. Any annoyance is also reduced by the fact that her people are clearly ''not'' intended by the author to be a perfect MarySue SuperiorSpecies; in the first book they are TheHorde of savage cannibals whom the BigBad easily manipulates into doing his dirty work with the intention of crushing them afterwards, and though they quickly show themselves to be a complex people their society clearly has a host of its own problems, even if they're different problems from the "civilised" Alerans.

to:

* By [[Creator/JimButcher the same author]], Kitai of the Marat in ''Literature/CodexAlera'' often talks about the shortcomings of the human Alerans, but she avoids the usual problems of this trope because: she herself is a likeable and sympathetic character, her exclamations of "_____ is/are insane!" are usually a RunningGag played for comic effect, her observations take the form of "your people are crazy" rather than "my people are awesome" and her criticisms are of social institutions that are either harmlessly ridiculous (the prudishness about nudity and sex) or clearly immoral (slavery), so she has a point. Any annoyance is also reduced by the fact that her people are clearly ''not'' intended by the author to be a perfect MarySue SuperiorSpecies; in the first book they are TheHorde of savage cannibals whom the BigBad easily manipulates into doing his dirty work with the intention of crushing them afterwards, and though they quickly show themselves to be a complex people their society clearly has a host of its own problems, even if they're different problems from the "civilised" Alerans.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Hobbit: Dwarfs —-> Dwarves


** Then in ''Film/TheHobbitTheBattleOfTheFiveArmies'', Thranduil first tries to force the Dwarves to fork over some treasures he wants. Then after the Orcs attack, he decides to pull out after some fighting, which would mean abandoning the Humans and Dwarfs to be slaughtered. And [[WhatTheHellHero when called on it]], his answer boils down to, "And?"

to:

** Then in ''Film/TheHobbitTheBattleOfTheFiveArmies'', Thranduil first tries to force the Dwarves to fork over some treasures he wants. Then after the Orcs attack, he decides to pull out after some fighting, which would mean abandoning the Humans and Dwarfs Dwarves to be slaughtered. And [[WhatTheHellHero when called on it]], his answer boils down to, "And?"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Inverted by Sera in ''Inquisition'', who sees all "elfy" elves as automatically haughty bigots and only "non-elfy" elves like her to be accepting and open-minded, and she's framed as indisputably correct. The PlayerCharacter can never meaningfully counter-argue and Sera [[StaticCharacter never changes her stance on it]]. While Solas is also rather bigoted toward most modern elves (particularly the Dalish) due to prefering ancient Elvhen, a Dalish Inquisitor who gains high RelationshipValues can show him that he's wrong and there's some value in Dalish culture, while a Low Approval Inquisitor can call him out on his bigoted attitude and [[HypocrisyNod get a grudging agreement]]. Sera gives no such leeway, and in fact most of the bigoted and outright mean-spirited things she says about elves ends up being proven correct ([[spoiler:like the elven gods being fake, elves being responsible for their own downfall rather than humans, the elven servants in ''Trespasser'' being suspicious, and so on]]), and the few times a Dalish Inquisitor can disagree with her, they're framed as trying to change her to be more elfy like them.

to:

** Inverted Played with by Sera in ''Inquisition'', a city elf with [[InternalizedCategorism internalized racism]] who sees all "elfy" elves as automatically haughty bigots and while only "non-elfy" elves like her to can be accepting and open-minded, open-minded... and she's framed as indisputably correct. The PlayerCharacter [[PlayerCharacter Inquisitor]] can never meaningfully counter-argue counter-argue, and Sera she [[StaticCharacter never changes her stance on it]]. it]] (thought becomes less mean-spirited about it in ''Trespasser''). While Solas is also rather bigoted toward most modern elves (particularly the Dalish) due to [[BornInTheWrongCentury prefering ancient Elvhen, Elvhen history and culture]], a Dalish Inquisitor who gains high RelationshipValues can show him that he's wrong and there's some value in Dalish culture, while a Low Approval Inquisitor can call him out on his bigoted attitude and [[HypocrisyNod get a grudging agreement]]. Sera gives no such leeway, and in fact [[spoiler:will break up with a romanced Dalish Inquisitor who refuses to agree the elven gods are fake]], and Sera is framed as the victim for it. Also, most of the Sera's bigoted and outright mean-spirited things she says ''mean-spirited'' statement about elves ends up being proven correct ([[spoiler:like correct. ([[spoiler:Like the elven gods being fake, elves being responsible for their own downfall rather than humans, the elven servants in ''Trespasser'' being suspicious, and so on]]), and the few times a Dalish Inquisitor can disagree with her, they're framed as trying to change her to be more elfy like them.on]]).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
A high approval Lavellan can convince Solas that the Dalish have some value, and a low approval Lavellan can call him out on his racist and dismissive attitude toward Dalish (which he'll grudgingly agree with), but the player is NOT ALLOWED to point out Sera's anti-elf bigotry or change her mind in any meaningful way. She's just framed as indisputably correct that "elfy elves" are all haughty bigots and ONLY "non-elfy elves" like her can be accepting or open-minded, and the player is forced to either agree or is framed as a bigot who's trying to change her.


** Some Dalish elves (who lead nomadic lives outside human settlements) attempt to invoke this over and over, but it never works. While the Dalish revere their ancestral elves as TheBeautifulElite and seek to restore their lost culture, they're still seen as barbaric dirt-dwellers by most humans, and dismissed as either heathens and savages or haughty bigots by many fellow city elves. Though this varies from clan to clan.

to:

** Some Dalish elves (who lead nomadic lives outside human settlements) attempt to invoke this over and over, but it never works. While the Dalish revere their ancestral elves as TheBeautifulElite and seek to restore their lost culture, they're still seen as barbaric dirt-dwellers by most humans, and dismissed as either heathens and heathen savages or haughty bigots by many fellow city elves. Though this varies from clan to clan.



*** Interestingly, two characters utilize this trope to explain their contempt of the Dalish elf cultures, one of them being Solas and the other being Sera (no irony lost on the fact that both characters are themselves non-Dalish elves); as explained above, both of them were exposed to Dalish who insisted they they alone possessed the moral superiority, despite their flaws and differences between clans, and were talked down to simply because they were not "elfy" enough. It is to the point that Sera outright rejects [[DontYouDarePityMe any sympathy or pity]] from Dalish elves when it comes to her city elf upbringing. (And her fanatical belief that only "non-elfy elves" like her are kind and accepting while ''all'' "elfy elves" are automatically haughty bigots is framed as indisputably correct, which the player can ''never'' even half-heartedly counter-argue.) For Solas, he is much more aware of the true nature of lost Elvhen culture, but the Dalish refuse to listen, instead becoming belligerent and defensive when he tries to tell them the unfortunate truths of the Dalish culture.

to:

*** Interestingly, two characters utilize this trope to explain their contempt of the Dalish elf cultures, one of them being Solas and the other being ** Inverted by Sera (no irony lost on the fact that both characters are themselves non-Dalish elves); as explained above, both of them were exposed to Dalish in ''Inquisition'', who insisted they they alone possessed the moral superiority, despite their flaws and differences between clans, and were talked down to simply because they were not sees all "elfy" enough. It is to the point that Sera outright rejects [[DontYouDarePityMe any sympathy or pity]] from Dalish elves when it comes to her city elf upbringing. (And her fanatical belief that only "non-elfy elves" like her are kind and accepting while ''all'' "elfy elves" are as automatically haughty bigots is and only "non-elfy" elves like her to be accepting and open-minded, and she's framed as indisputably correct, which correct. The PlayerCharacter can never meaningfully counter-argue and Sera [[StaticCharacter never changes her stance on it]]. While Solas is also rather bigoted toward most modern elves (particularly the player Dalish) due to prefering ancient Elvhen, a Dalish Inquisitor who gains high RelationshipValues can ''never'' even half-heartedly counter-argue.) For Solas, he is much more aware of the true nature of lost Elvhen show him that he's wrong and there's some value in Dalish culture, but while a Low Approval Inquisitor can call him out on his bigoted attitude and [[HypocrisyNod get a grudging agreement]]. Sera gives no such leeway, and in fact most of the bigoted and outright mean-spirited things she says about elves ends up being proven correct ([[spoiler:like the elven gods being fake, elves being responsible for their own downfall rather than humans, the elven servants in ''Trespasser'' being suspicious, and so on]]), and the few times a Dalish refuse Inquisitor can disagree with her, they're framed as trying to listen, instead becoming belligerent and defensive when he tries change her to tell them the unfortunate truths of the Dalish culture. be more elfy like them.



** In ''Inquisition'', Madame Vivienne de Fer, the Orlesian noble and Pro-Circle mage, fits this trope to a T. She frequently goes on {{Character Filibuster}}s extolling the virtues of her Orlesian [[TheFashionista image-obsessed politics]], DeadlyDecadentCourt, and [[TheChurch Chantry]] [[AntiMagicalFaction Circles]] while harshly condemning the dangers and "selfishness" of mage freedom, despite being a [[{{Hypocrite}} mage who lives outside Circle prison towers herself]], and neither the Inquisitor nor companions ''ever'' get a chance to meaningfully counter-argue any of her points. The few weak rebuttals they can give, Vivienne easily twists their words around to support her own view and she almost ''always'' gets the last word. Vivienne is also openly [[VanityIsFeminine vain and haughty]], but this is framed as a [[AwesomeEgo character strength]] rather than a flaw, and no matter what the player's choices Vivienne ''always'' succeeds in her goal of [[spoiler:restoring the Circles with herself at the helm, possibly as this world's equivalent of Fantasy Pope.]]
*** On this note, the upper echelons of Orlesian society in general pretty much ''intentionally'' make this trope part of their culture, mixing it in with [[DeadlyDecadentCourt deadly court intrigues]] in a practice known as "the Game" or "the Great Game." Basically, you ''have'' to be openly sure of yourself and impregnable against criticism, because even the ''slightest,'' tiniest weakness that your enemy can exploit ''will'' be exploited, and leave you vulnerable to the wolves of the Court to tear you apart, sometimes figuratively, and sometimes ''literally.'' Anything from having your assassination plot against a rival exposed, to ''picking the wrong utensil at a dinner'' can be used as ammunition against you, and ''Maker help you'' if you try to slander an enemy without something to back it up. Unfortunately, among the more humble members of the Inquisition, this does Vivienne or the rest of the Orlesian elite few favors in winning their friendship. Unfortunately, the problem arises with the fact that Vivienne de Fer almost ''always'' gets the last word in ''every'' discussion with the PlayerCharacter and companions, even if those ''same'' characters can give meaningful counter-arguments to other members of Orlesian society, and typically only when Vivienne is ''not'' in earshot. It ends up making it seem like the [[CreatorsPet writers themselves frame Vivienne as indisputably correct]] and shield her from ''ever'' having to actually address any legitimate criticisms.

to:

** In ''Inquisition'', Madame Vivienne de Fer, the Orlesian noble and Pro-Circle mage, fits this trope to a T. She mage frequently goes on {{Character Filibuster}}s extolling the virtues of her Orlesian [[TheFashionista image-obsessed politics]], DeadlyDecadentCourt, and [[TheChurch Chantry]] [[AntiMagicalFaction Circles]] while harshly condemning the dangers and "selfishness" of mage freedom, despite being a [[{{Hypocrite}} mage who lives outside Circle prison towers herself]], and neither the Inquisitor nor companions can ''ever'' get a chance to meaningfully counter-argue any of her points. counter-argue. The few weak rebuttals they can give, Vivienne easily twists their words around to support her own view view, and she almost ''always'' gets the last word. Vivienne is also openly [[VanityIsFeminine vain and haughty]], but this is framed as a [[AwesomeEgo character strength]] rather than a flaw, and no matter what the player's choices Vivienne ''always'' succeeds in her goal of [[spoiler:restoring the Circles with herself at the helm, possibly as this world's equivalent of Fantasy Pope.]]
*** On this note, the upper echelons of Orlesian society in general pretty much ''intentionally'' make this trope part of their culture, mixing it in with [[DeadlyDecadentCourt deadly court intrigues]] in a practice known as "the Game" or "the Great Game." Basically, you ''have'' to be openly sure of yourself and impregnable against criticism, because even the ''slightest,'' tiniest weakness that your enemy can exploit ''will'' be exploited, and leave you vulnerable to the wolves of the Court to tear you apart, sometimes figuratively, and sometimes ''literally.'' Anything from having your assassination plot against a rival exposed, to ''picking the wrong utensil at a dinner'' can be used as ammunition against you, and ''Maker help you'' if you try to slander an enemy without something to back it up. Unfortunately, among the more humble members of the Inquisition, this does Vivienne or the rest of the Orlesian elite few favors in winning their friendship. Unfortunately, Though again, the problem arises with player and companions are never ''allowed'' to meaningfully counter-argue any of her points to her face, only when she's out of earshot, so she's shielded by the fact that Vivienne de Fer almost ''always'' gets the last word in ''every'' discussion with the PlayerCharacter and companions, even if those ''same'' characters can give writers from ever having to admit she might be wrong or address a meaningful counter-arguments counter-arguement to other members any of Orlesian society, and typically only when Vivienne is ''not'' in earshot. It ends up making it seem like the [[CreatorsPet writers themselves frame Vivienne as indisputably correct]] and shield her from ''ever'' having to actually address any legitimate criticisms. views.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Oops, forgot to remove an earlier draft


* Caesar's Legion from ''VideoGame/FalloutNewVegas''is a sexist, imperialistic, totalitarian dictatorship that deals in widespread slavery (mostly of women), and has already assimilated countless tribes through raping and pillaging sprees that would make Conan the Barbarian blush, ''completely erasing'' the culture of those that surrendered in favor of their own homogenous society, and flat out executing or [[FateWorseThanDeath crucifying]] anyone who doesn't surrender. Their leader, who named ''himself'' after the same Caesar from history, is actually a Followers of the Apocalypse envoy who based the society he made after some old, dusty books he found in a pre-war cache, and, while initially using them to build up the tribe that was holding his envoy for ransom so that he wouldn't be slaughtered with them, decided he could expand this into an empire modeled after Ancient Roman society.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
I feel like I could phrase that better but for the life of me my brain isn't working tonight. If someone wants to expand on it or correct it, be my guest.

Added DiffLines:

* Caesar's Legion from ''VideoGame/FalloutNewVegas'' has some issues with this. Much like with the examples regarding Orleasian society and Vivienne in the ''Dragon Age'' entries above, despite the absolutely ''horrifying'' things the Legion does (such as the slavery, sexism, executing detractors, and raping and pillaging that would make Conan the Barbarian blush to name ''a few'') you never get a chance to actually counter-argue these points with Caesar himself, with the best excuse being that it's all "[[UtopiaJustifiesTheMeans for the greater good]]."


Added DiffLines:

* Caesar's Legion from ''VideoGame/FalloutNewVegas''is a sexist, imperialistic, totalitarian dictatorship that deals in widespread slavery (mostly of women), and has already assimilated countless tribes through raping and pillaging sprees that would make Conan the Barbarian blush, ''completely erasing'' the culture of those that surrendered in favor of their own homogenous society, and flat out executing or [[FateWorseThanDeath crucifying]] anyone who doesn't surrender. Their leader, who named ''himself'' after the same Caesar from history, is actually a Followers of the Apocalypse envoy who based the society he made after some old, dusty books he found in a pre-war cache, and, while initially using them to build up the tribe that was holding his envoy for ransom so that he wouldn't be slaughtered with them, decided he could expand this into an empire modeled after Ancient Roman society.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
A good point, just wanted to make it sound less like Natter


*** On this note, the upper echelons of Orlesian society in general pretty much ''intentionally'' make this trope part of their culture, mixing it in with [[DeadlyDecadentCourt deadly court intrigues]] in a practice known as "the Game" or "the Great Game." Basically, you ''have'' to be openly sure of yourself and impregnable against criticism, because even the ''slightest,'' tiniest weakness that your enemy can exploit ''will'' be exploited, and leave you vulnerable to the wolves of the Court to tear you apart, sometimes figuratively, and sometimes ''literally.'' Anything from having your assassination plot against a rival exposed, to ''picking the wrong utensil at a dinner'' can be used as ammunition against you, and ''Maker help you'' if you try to slander an enemy without something to back it up. Unfortunately, among the more humble members of the Inquisition, this does Vivienne or the rest of the Orlesian elite few favors in winning their friendship. Though again, the fact that Vivienne de Fer almost ''always'' gets the last word in ''every'' discussion with the PlayerCharacter and companions, even though those same characters can give meaningful counter-arguments only when Vivienne is ''not'' in earshot, just makes it seem like the [[CreatorsPet writers themselves frame Vivienne as indisputably correct]] and shield her from ''ever'' having to address any meaningful counter-argument.

to:

*** On this note, the upper echelons of Orlesian society in general pretty much ''intentionally'' make this trope part of their culture, mixing it in with [[DeadlyDecadentCourt deadly court intrigues]] in a practice known as "the Game" or "the Great Game." Basically, you ''have'' to be openly sure of yourself and impregnable against criticism, because even the ''slightest,'' tiniest weakness that your enemy can exploit ''will'' be exploited, and leave you vulnerable to the wolves of the Court to tear you apart, sometimes figuratively, and sometimes ''literally.'' Anything from having your assassination plot against a rival exposed, to ''picking the wrong utensil at a dinner'' can be used as ammunition against you, and ''Maker help you'' if you try to slander an enemy without something to back it up. Unfortunately, among the more humble members of the Inquisition, this does Vivienne or the rest of the Orlesian elite few favors in winning their friendship. Though again, Unfortunately, the problem arises with the fact that Vivienne de Fer almost ''always'' gets the last word in ''every'' discussion with the PlayerCharacter and companions, even though if those same ''same'' characters can give meaningful counter-arguments to other members of Orlesian society, and typically only when Vivienne is ''not'' in earshot, just makes earshot. It ends up making it seem like the [[CreatorsPet writers themselves frame Vivienne as indisputably correct]] and shield her from ''ever'' having to actually address any meaningful counter-argument.legitimate criticisms.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Sera and Vivienne from Dragon Age: Inquisition are both framed as indisputably correct in their assessments and the player can NEVER meaningfully counter-argue any of their statements.


*** Interestingly, two characters utilize this trope to explain their contempt of the Dalish elf cultures, one of them being Solas and the other being Sera (no irony lost on the fact that both characters are themselves non-Dalish elves); as explained above, both of them were exposed to Dalish who insisted they they alone possessed the moral superiority, despite their flaws and differences between clans, and were talked down to simply because they were not "elfy" enough. It is to the point that Sera outright rejects [[DontYouDarePityMe any sympathy or pity]] from Dalish elves when it comes to her city elf upbringing. For Solas, he is much more aware of the true nature of lost Elvhen culture, but the Dalish refuse to listen, instead becoming belligerent and defensive when he tries to tell them the unfortunate truths of the Dalish culture.

to:

*** Interestingly, two characters utilize this trope to explain their contempt of the Dalish elf cultures, one of them being Solas and the other being Sera (no irony lost on the fact that both characters are themselves non-Dalish elves); as explained above, both of them were exposed to Dalish who insisted they they alone possessed the moral superiority, despite their flaws and differences between clans, and were talked down to simply because they were not "elfy" enough. It is to the point that Sera outright rejects [[DontYouDarePityMe any sympathy or pity]] from Dalish elves when it comes to her city elf upbringing. (And her fanatical belief that only "non-elfy elves" like her are kind and accepting while ''all'' "elfy elves" are automatically haughty bigots is framed as indisputably correct, which the player can ''never'' even half-heartedly counter-argue.) For Solas, he is much more aware of the true nature of lost Elvhen culture, but the Dalish refuse to listen, instead becoming belligerent and defensive when he tries to tell them the unfortunate truths of the Dalish culture.



*** On this note, the upper echelons of Orlesian society in general pretty much ''intentionally'' make this trope part of their culture, mixing it in with [[DeadlyDecadentCourt deadly court intrigues]] in a practice known as "the Game" or "the Great Game." Basically, you ''have'' to be openly sure of yourself and impregnable against criticism, because even the ''slightest,'' tiniest weakness that your enemy can exploit ''will'' be exploited, and leave you vulnerable to the wolves of the Court to tear you apart, sometimes figuratively, and sometimes ''literally.'' Anything from having your assassination plot against a rival exposed, to ''picking the wrong utensil at a dinner'' can be used as ammunition against you, and ''Maker help you'' if you try to slander an enemy without something to back it up. Unfortunately, among the more humble members of the Inquisition, this does Vivienne or the rest of the Orlesian elite few favors in winning their friendship.

to:

*** On this note, the upper echelons of Orlesian society in general pretty much ''intentionally'' make this trope part of their culture, mixing it in with [[DeadlyDecadentCourt deadly court intrigues]] in a practice known as "the Game" or "the Great Game." Basically, you ''have'' to be openly sure of yourself and impregnable against criticism, because even the ''slightest,'' tiniest weakness that your enemy can exploit ''will'' be exploited, and leave you vulnerable to the wolves of the Court to tear you apart, sometimes figuratively, and sometimes ''literally.'' Anything from having your assassination plot against a rival exposed, to ''picking the wrong utensil at a dinner'' can be used as ammunition against you, and ''Maker help you'' if you try to slander an enemy without something to back it up. Unfortunately, among the more humble members of the Inquisition, this does Vivienne or the rest of the Orlesian elite few favors in winning their friendship. Though again, the fact that Vivienne de Fer almost ''always'' gets the last word in ''every'' discussion with the PlayerCharacter and companions, even though those same characters can give meaningful counter-arguments only when Vivienne is ''not'' in earshot, just makes it seem like the [[CreatorsPet writers themselves frame Vivienne as indisputably correct]] and shield her from ''ever'' having to address any meaningful counter-argument.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Downplayed in ''[[https://forums.spacebattles.com/threads/exitium-eternal-mass-effect-doom-id-verse.675235/#post-50240875 Exitium Eternal]]''. The Exalted Exitium are noticeably condescending, if unintentionally so, towards the Citadel races when it comes to magic or any other matters in which they are experts. Saren chafes at being treated like a teenager who barely understands combat when he's one of the best Spectres in the galaxy. On the other hand, the Exalted Exitium has no problem deferring to others who have more experience in other matters. Most notably, they have been at war for longer than their government has existed and have zero experience with diplomacy or peacetime politics.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Even if they are ''supposed'' to be humble, they can't resist lecturing humans on their errant ways or pointing out humanity's flaws. If you try to argue or mock them back, they will just sniff disdainfully and proceed to destroy your argument (even if it doesn't make sense), proving them "right" once again.

to:

Even if they are ''supposed'' to be humble, they can't resist lecturing humans on their errant ways or pointing out humanity's flaws. If you try to argue or mock them back, they will just sniff disdainfully and proceed to destroy your argument (even ([[ChewbaccaDefense even if it it]] [[InsaneTrollLogic doesn't make sense), sense]]), proving them "right" once again.

Added: 968

Changed: 482

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In ''Inquisition'', Madame Vivienne de Fer, the Orlesian noble and Pro-Circle mage, fits this trope to a T. She frequently goes on {{Character Filibuster}}s extolling the virtues of her Orlesian [[TheFashionista image-obsessed politics]], DeadlyDecadentCourt, and [[TheChurch Chantry]] [[AntiMagicalFaction Circles]] while harshly condemning the dangers and "selfishness" of mage freedom, despite being a [[{{Hypocrite}} mage who lives outside Circle prison towers herself]], and neither the Inquisitor nor companions ''ever'' get a chance to meaningfully counter-argue any of her points. The few weak rebuttals they can give, Vivienne easily twists their words around to support her own view and she almost ''always'' gets the last word. Vivienne is also openly [[VanityIsFeminine vain and haughty]], but this is framed as a [[AwesomeEgo character strength]] rather than a flaw, and no matter what the player's choices Vivienne ''always'' succeeds in her goal of [[spoiler:restoring the Circles with herself at the helm, possibly as this world's equivalent of Fantasy Pope.]] Of course, part of her haughty demeanor has to do with the risky business of Orlesian politics, where you practically ''have'' to be prideful and absolutely full of yourself in a court where even so much as ''choosing the wrong utensil'' can result in your entire family being publicly shamed at best, and ''stabbed to death with the correct utensil'' at worst, though unfortunately among the more humble members of the Inquisition it does her no favors in winning their friendship.

to:

** In ''Inquisition'', Madame Vivienne de Fer, the Orlesian noble and Pro-Circle mage, fits this trope to a T. She frequently goes on {{Character Filibuster}}s extolling the virtues of her Orlesian [[TheFashionista image-obsessed politics]], DeadlyDecadentCourt, and [[TheChurch Chantry]] [[AntiMagicalFaction Circles]] while harshly condemning the dangers and "selfishness" of mage freedom, despite being a [[{{Hypocrite}} mage who lives outside Circle prison towers herself]], and neither the Inquisitor nor companions ''ever'' get a chance to meaningfully counter-argue any of her points. The few weak rebuttals they can give, Vivienne easily twists their words around to support her own view and she almost ''always'' gets the last word. Vivienne is also openly [[VanityIsFeminine vain and haughty]], but this is framed as a [[AwesomeEgo character strength]] rather than a flaw, and no matter what the player's choices Vivienne ''always'' succeeds in her goal of [[spoiler:restoring the Circles with herself at the helm, possibly as this world's equivalent of Fantasy Pope.]] Of course, part of her haughty demeanor has to do with ]]
*** On this note,
the risky business upper echelons of Orlesian politics, where society in general pretty much ''intentionally'' make this trope part of their culture, mixing it in with [[DeadlyDecadentCourt deadly court intrigues]] in a practice known as "the Game" or "the Great Game." Basically, you practically ''have'' to be prideful and absolutely full openly sure of yourself in a court where and impregnable against criticism, because even so much as ''choosing the ''slightest,'' tiniest weakness that your enemy can exploit ''will'' be exploited, and leave you vulnerable to the wolves of the Court to tear you apart, sometimes figuratively, and sometimes ''literally.'' Anything from having your assassination plot against a rival exposed, to ''picking the wrong utensil'' utensil at a dinner'' can result in your entire family being publicly shamed at best, be used as ammunition against you, and ''stabbed ''Maker help you'' if you try to death with the correct utensil'' at worst, though unfortunately slander an enemy without something to back it up. Unfortunately, among the more humble members of the Inquisition it Inquisition, this does her no Vivienne or the rest of the Orlesian elite few favors in winning their friendship.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** It's also shown (mostly in the official manga) that being right about their personal philosophy and having something to flaunt are two different things. RealityEnsues when they come into conflict with earthborn Youkai again and their long period of fanatic isolationism lets [[TheChessmaster Yukari]] play them for fools.

to:

** It's also shown (mostly in the official manga) that being right about their personal philosophy and having something to flaunt are two different things. RealityEnsues SurprisinglyRealisticOutcome occurs when they come into conflict with earthborn Youkai again and their long period of fanatic isolationism lets [[TheChessmaster Yukari]] play them for fools.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** First you have the Craftworld Eldar, who take their arrogance to the levels of "we're better than everyone else, so we're allowed to [[ItsAllAboutMe kill thousands of the lesser races to preserve the lives of a few of us]]" [[CrapsackWorld (though to be fair, everyone else in the setting has the same mentality)]]. Next, you have the [[EvilCounterpart Dark Eldar]], who take their arrogance level to "we're better than everyone else, so we're allowed to kidnap thousands of the lesser races and take them back to our inter-dimensional WretchedHive city and brutally torture, rape and kill them because we need to eat their emotions and souls, and [[ForTheEvulz besides, it's fun]]". [[TheFairFolk Yep]]. Unlike their Fantasy counterparts, however, while the Craftworld and Dark Eldar don't ''like'' each other, they recognize each other as Eldar and are fully capable of cooperating for mutual benefit without stabbing each other in the back.

to:

** First you have the Craftworld Eldar, who take their arrogance to the levels of "we're better than everyone else, so we're allowed to [[ItsAllAboutMe kill thousands of the lesser races to preserve the lives of a few of us]]" [[CrapsackWorld (though to be fair, everyone else in the setting has the same mentality)]]. Next, you have the [[EvilCounterpart Dark Eldar]], who take their arrogance level to "we're better than everyone else, so we're allowed to kidnap thousands of the lesser races and take them back to our inter-dimensional WretchedHive city and brutally torture, rape and kill them because we need to eat their emotions and souls, and [[ForTheEvulz besides, it's fun]]". [[TheFairFolk Yep]]. Unlike their Fantasy counterparts, however, while the Craftworld and Dark Eldar don't ''like'' each other, they recognize each other as Eldar and are fully capable of cooperating for mutual benefit without stabbing each other in the back. And then there's the Harlequins, a sect of [[NinjaPirateZombieRobot space-elf ninja thespians]] dedicated to worship of the lost Eldar god Cegorach and thwarting the efforts of Chaos. Hilariously, these {{Monster Clown}}s who keep [[CruelAndUnusualDeath liquifying people]] and being mysterious and utterly terrifying for ''no reason'', are also the least arrogant and xenophobic (being the most likely to ally with humans against Chaos) of the Eldar and thus the most likeable.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* A Halo/Star Wars crossover that can be found here https://www.fanfiction.net/s/5869588/1/Fighting-for-a-Purpose-V2 has the Allied Species (a faction made of Humans and the Covenant races, minus the Prophets). They have no problem with burning entire planets, the humans in their military are basically an army of super-soldiers, and the weaker Covenant races have inexplicably become more badass. They also seem to have an endless supply of soldiers and warships, which doesn't make sense given that in the backstory there were two Covenant Civil Wars in the last forty years. This faction should be much weaker than it is. That aside, the Allied Species spend much of the story criticizing the Jedi and the Republic(with whom they happen to be in an alliance) in general, while their own flaws are never mentioned. The Allied Species are always right and the Jedi are always wrong.

to:

* A Halo/Star Wars crossover that can be found here https://www.found [[https://www.fanfiction.net/s/5869588/1/Fighting-for-a-Purpose-V2 here]] has the Allied Species (a faction made of Humans and the Covenant races, minus the Prophets). They have no problem with burning entire planets, the humans in their military are basically an army of super-soldiers, and the weaker Covenant races have inexplicably become more badass. They also seem to have an endless supply of soldiers and warships, which doesn't make sense given that in the backstory there were two Covenant Civil Wars in the last forty years. This faction should be much weaker than it is. That aside, the Allied Species spend much of the story criticizing the Jedi and the Republic(with whom they happen to be in an alliance) in general, while their own flaws are never mentioned. The Allied Species are always right and the Jedi are always wrong.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In [=DAI=], Madame Vivienne de Fer, the Orlesian noble and Pro-Circle mage, fits this trope to a T. She frequently goes on {{Character Filibuster}}s extolling the virtues of her Orlesian [[TheFashionista image-obsessed politics]], DeadlyDecadentCourt, and [[TheChurch Chantry]] [[AntiMagicalFaction Circles]] while harshly condemning the dangers and "selfishness" of mage freedom, despite being a [[{{Hypocrite}} mage who lives outside Circle prison towers herself]], and neither the Inquisitor nor companions ''ever'' get a chance to meaningfully counter-argue any of her points. The few weak rebuttals they can give, Vivienne easily twists their words around to support her own view and she almost ''always'' gets the last word. Vivienne is also openly [[VanityIsFeminine vain and haughty]], but this is framed as a [[AwesomeEgo character strength]] rather than a flaw, and no matter what the player's choices Vivienne ''always'' succeeds in her goal of [[spoiler:restoring the Circles with herself at the helm, possibly as this world's equivalent of Fantasy Pope.]] Of course, part of her haughty demeanor has to do with the risky business of Orlesian politics, where you practically ''have'' to be prideful and absolutely full of yourself in a court where even so much as ''choosing the wrong utensil'' can result in your entire family being publicly shamed at best, and ''stabbed to death with the correct utensil'' at worst, though unfortunately among the more humble members of the Inquisition it does her no favors in winning their friendship.

to:

** In [=DAI=], ''Inquisition'', Madame Vivienne de Fer, the Orlesian noble and Pro-Circle mage, fits this trope to a T. She frequently goes on {{Character Filibuster}}s extolling the virtues of her Orlesian [[TheFashionista image-obsessed politics]], DeadlyDecadentCourt, and [[TheChurch Chantry]] [[AntiMagicalFaction Circles]] while harshly condemning the dangers and "selfishness" of mage freedom, despite being a [[{{Hypocrite}} mage who lives outside Circle prison towers herself]], and neither the Inquisitor nor companions ''ever'' get a chance to meaningfully counter-argue any of her points. The few weak rebuttals they can give, Vivienne easily twists their words around to support her own view and she almost ''always'' gets the last word. Vivienne is also openly [[VanityIsFeminine vain and haughty]], but this is framed as a [[AwesomeEgo character strength]] rather than a flaw, and no matter what the player's choices Vivienne ''always'' succeeds in her goal of [[spoiler:restoring the Circles with herself at the helm, possibly as this world's equivalent of Fantasy Pope.]] Of course, part of her haughty demeanor has to do with the risky business of Orlesian politics, where you practically ''have'' to be prideful and absolutely full of yourself in a court where even so much as ''choosing the wrong utensil'' can result in your entire family being publicly shamed at best, and ''stabbed to death with the correct utensil'' at worst, though unfortunately among the more humble members of the Inquisition it does her no favors in winning their friendship.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Bear in mind that examples should be limited to examples only, not your personal issues with it; yes, the Inquisitor could say "this or that" to counter her, or that there's a glaring flaw in her logic "there" or whatnot, but that's kind of the point— she's too prideful to allow such arguments in the first place; what's why you literally "can't argue with her"


** In [=DAI=], Madame Vivienne de Fer the Orlesian noble and Pro-Circle mage frequently goes on {{Character Filibuster}}s extolling the virtues of her Orlesian [[TheFashionista image-obsessed politics]], DeadlyDecadentCourt, and [[TheChurch Chantry]] [[AntiMagicalFaction Circles]] while harshly condemning the dangers and "selfishness" of mage freedom (despite being a [[{{Hypocrite}} mage who lives outside Circle prison towers herself]]), and neither the Inquisitor nor companions can ''ever'' meaningfully counter-argue any of her points.[[note]]She often claims the [[AntiMagicalFaction Chantry Circles]] are the best and ''only'' way to train mages to control their powers and a NecessaryEvil to protect them from ordinary citizens who would lynch them out of fear, and the Inquisitor can never point out to Vivienne the obvious fact that [[PropagandaMachine the Chantry]] encourages most ordinary citizens to fear them that much to begin with. (Even more egregiously, the Inquisitor can make this same argument later to Chantry Sister Leliana, who ''agrees with them''[[/note]] The few weak rebuttals they can give, Vivienne easily twists their words around to support her own view[[note]]For example, a Dalish Inquisitor who points out how wandering nomadic Dalish Elven Clans venerate mages as Keepers who study lost lore and guide their people, Vivienne brusquely points out how they only allow three mages per Clan, and dismisses the suggestion since the Dalish couldn't realistically take in ''all'' mages in Thedas (human and elf), with the Inquisitor unable to point out that they're not saying the wandering nomadic clans would literally take in all mages, but that their system would simply be a model to try to improve and replicate[[/note]] and she almost ''always'' gets the last word. Vivienne is also openly [[VanityIsFeminine vain and haughty]], but this is framed as a [[AwesomeEgo character strength]] rather than a [[FatalFlaw flaw]], and no matter what the player's choices Vivienne ''always'' succeeds in her goal of [[spoiler:retoring the Circles with herself at the helm, possibly as this world's equivalent of Fantasy Pope.]]

to:

** In [=DAI=], Madame Vivienne de Fer Fer, the Orlesian noble and Pro-Circle mage mage, fits this trope to a T. She frequently goes on {{Character Filibuster}}s extolling the virtues of her Orlesian [[TheFashionista image-obsessed politics]], DeadlyDecadentCourt, and [[TheChurch Chantry]] [[AntiMagicalFaction Circles]] while harshly condemning the dangers and "selfishness" of mage freedom (despite freedom, despite being a [[{{Hypocrite}} mage who lives outside Circle prison towers herself]]), herself]], and neither the Inquisitor nor companions can ''ever'' get a chance to meaningfully counter-argue any of her points.[[note]]She often claims the [[AntiMagicalFaction Chantry Circles]] are the best and ''only'' way to train mages to control their powers and a NecessaryEvil to protect them from ordinary citizens who would lynch them out of fear, and the Inquisitor can never point out to Vivienne the obvious fact that [[PropagandaMachine the Chantry]] encourages most ordinary citizens to fear them that much to begin with. (Even more egregiously, the Inquisitor can make this same argument later to Chantry Sister Leliana, who ''agrees with them''[[/note]] points. The few weak rebuttals they can give, Vivienne easily twists their words around to support her own view[[note]]For example, a Dalish Inquisitor who points out how wandering nomadic Dalish Elven Clans venerate mages as Keepers who study lost lore and guide their people, Vivienne brusquely points out how they only allow three mages per Clan, and dismisses the suggestion since the Dalish couldn't realistically take in ''all'' mages in Thedas (human and elf), with the Inquisitor unable to point out that they're not saying the wandering nomadic clans would literally take in all mages, but that their system would simply be a model to try to improve and replicate[[/note]] view and she almost ''always'' gets the last word. Vivienne is also openly [[VanityIsFeminine vain and haughty]], but this is framed as a [[AwesomeEgo character strength]] rather than a [[FatalFlaw flaw]], flaw, and no matter what the player's choices Vivienne ''always'' succeeds in her goal of [[spoiler:retoring [[spoiler:restoring the Circles with herself at the helm, possibly as this world's equivalent of Fantasy Pope.]]]] Of course, part of her haughty demeanor has to do with the risky business of Orlesian politics, where you practically ''have'' to be prideful and absolutely full of yourself in a court where even so much as ''choosing the wrong utensil'' can result in your entire family being publicly shamed at best, and ''stabbed to death with the correct utensil'' at worst, though unfortunately among the more humble members of the Inquisition it does her no favors in winning their friendship.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Interestingly, two characters utilize this trope to explain their contempt of the Dalish elf cultures, one of them being Solas and the other being Sera (no irony lost on the fact that both characters are themselves non-Dalish elves); as explained above, both of them were exposed to Dalish who insisted they they alone possessed the moral superiority, despite their flaws and differences between clans, and were talked down to simply because they were not "elfy" enough. It is to the point that Sera outright rejects [[DontYouDarePityMe any sympathy or pity]] from Dalish elves when it comes to her city elf upbringing. For Solas, he is much more aware of the true nature of lost Elvhen culture, but the Dalish refuse to listen, instead becoming belligerent and defensive when he tries to tell them the unfortunate truths of the Dalish culture.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The Lunarians of ''Franchise/TouhouProject'' believe that "Impurity" is the source of mortality and death, and so they migrated to the Moon in ages past, untouched by death as it was, and formed a society there based around the concept of Purity... all of this would sound crazy if it wasn't for the fact that they were right, and they actually became immortal super-beings by separating themselves from death and mortality... Unfortunately, they are also outrageously elitist and xenophobic jerks towards all things associated with the Earth due to their conviction that all things coming from the Earth are inherently impure, which actually happens to be the case... Earthborn characters generally talk about the Lunarians as a bunch of obnoxious lunatics.

to:

* The Lunarians of ''Franchise/TouhouProject'' believe that "Impurity" is the source of mortality and death, and so they migrated to the Moon in ages past, untouched by death as it was, and formed a society there based around the concept of Purity... all Purity. All of this would sound crazy if it wasn't for the fact that they were right, and they actually became immortal super-beings by separating themselves from death and mortality... mortality. Unfortunately, even though they are also correct about the fact that all things from the Earth are inherently impure, they're still outrageously elitist and xenophobic jerks towards all things associated with the Earth due to their conviction that all things coming from the Earth are inherently impure, which actually happens to be the case... about it, so Earthborn characters generally talk about the Lunarians as a bunch of obnoxious lunatics.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Inverted in ''Franchise/DragonAge'' where elves are considered lesser and barbaric by the humans, who take up the arrogant mantle and enslave the elves; even after the elves are freed from slavery they're still third-class citizens.

to:

* Inverted in ''Franchise/DragonAge'' where elves are considered lesser and barbaric by the humans, who take up the arrogant mantle and [[EnslavedElves enslave the elves; elves]]; even after the elves are freed from slavery they're still third-class citizens.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
This was already removed from the YMMV page for misuse and obvious venting, so I don't think it belings here either.


* One of the underlying messages of ''VideoGame/{{Undertale}}'' is the question of whether or not it's okay to kill video game characters simply because they're fictional. The monsters of the Underground are quirky individuals who are meant to subvert the trope of monsters being evil. They are nice, friendly individuals who can be talked out of trying to kill the protagonist. However, many of them express scorn towards the violence demonstrated by the humans of the past, and they frequently discuss the importance of finding peaceful solutions to conflict (Flowey, Toriel, Undyne, Sans, Asriel, etc). Never mind the fact that Frisk and the Player never get the opportunity to call out the monsters over the possibility of being killed over and over by [[PlayingTheVictimCard a bunch of so-called victims]], even with the inherent ability to [[SaveScumming save, load and reset]].
** In one of his numerous Judgement speeches, Sans states that he can understand killing in self-defense, ''but if you pay very close attention to his tone'', it's not hard to infer that Sans [[WhatTheHellPlayer doesn't really believe that Frisk/The Player actually killed people in simple self-defense]]. Keep in mind that there is no dialogue option given to the Player to allow them to interrupt Sans's long-winded speech or call him out for his attitude:
--->'''Sans''': huh? you looked bored. i get the feeling you aren't gonna learn anything from this. well, guess i gotta judge you then. hmmm. . . over lv3, huh. [[YouBastard you killed some people on purpose, didn't you]]? that's probably bad. though, maybe some of it was in self-defense. . . [[SarcasmMode i don't know. help me out here]]. [[BlatantLies i wasn't watching]]. [[ItCantBeHelped anyways, don't do that]].
** This is taken UpToEleven if [[SacrificialLamb Papyrus is dead at this point]]. Note that the only available responses to the following question are ''Yes'' and ''No'' (and not "''[[ShutUpKirk Shut up, Sans!]]''"), ensuring that Sans will ''always'' gets the last word and [[AndThatsTerrible chew you out for being a terrible person]]:
--->'''Sans''': though... one thing about you always struck me as kinda odd. now, i understand acting in self-defense. you were thrown into those situation against your will. but... sometimes... [[SeenItAll you act like you know what's gonna happen]]. [[GroundHogPeggySue like you've already experienced it all before]]. [[ImplausibleDeniability this is an odd thing to say]], but... if you have some sort of special power... [[WithGreatPowerComesGreatResponsibility isn't it your responsibility to do the right thing]]?


Added: 2155

Removed: 1160

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Vivienne the Orlesian noble and Pro-Circle mage frequently goes on {{Character Filibuster}}s extolling the virtues of her Orlesian [[TheFashionista fashion-consciousness]], [[DeadlyDecadentCourt deadly politics]], and [[TheChurch Chantry]] [[AntiMagicalFaction Circles]] while harshly condemning the inherent dangers and selfishness of mage freedom (despite being a [[{{Hypocrite}} mage who lives outside Circle prison towers herself]]), and neither the Inquisitor nor companions can ''ever'' meaningfully counter-argue.[[note]]For example, Vivienne often claims the [[AntiMagicalFaction Circles]] are a NecessaryEvil to protect mages from being lynched by ordinary citizens who hate and fear them, and the Inquisitor can ''never'' point out how [[PropagandaMachine the Chantry]] encourages most ordinary citizens to hate and fear them enough to lynch them to begin with. Even more egregiously, the Inquisitor can make this same argument later to Chantry Sister Leliana, who ''agrees with them''.[[/note]] The few times they can present a weak rebuttal, Vivienne easily twists their words around to support her own view and almost always gets the last word.



** In [=DAI=], Madame Vivienne de Fer the Orlesian noble and Pro-Circle mage frequently goes on {{Character Filibuster}}s extolling the virtues of her Orlesian [[TheFashionista image-obsessed politics]], DeadlyDecadentCourt, and [[TheChurch Chantry]] [[AntiMagicalFaction Circles]] while harshly condemning the dangers and "selfishness" of mage freedom (despite being a [[{{Hypocrite}} mage who lives outside Circle prison towers herself]]), and neither the Inquisitor nor companions can ''ever'' meaningfully counter-argue any of her points.[[note]]She often claims the [[AntiMagicalFaction Chantry Circles]] are the best and ''only'' way to train mages to control their powers and a NecessaryEvil to protect them from ordinary citizens who would lynch them out of fear, and the Inquisitor can never point out to Vivienne the obvious fact that [[PropagandaMachine the Chantry]] encourages most ordinary citizens to fear them that much to begin with. (Even more egregiously, the Inquisitor can make this same argument later to Chantry Sister Leliana, who ''agrees with them''[[/note]] The few weak rebuttals they can give, Vivienne easily twists their words around to support her own view[[note]]For example, a Dalish Inquisitor who points out how wandering nomadic Dalish Elven Clans venerate mages as Keepers who study lost lore and guide their people, Vivienne brusquely points out how they only allow three mages per Clan, and dismisses the suggestion since the Dalish couldn't realistically take in ''all'' mages in Thedas (human and elf), with the Inquisitor unable to point out that they're not saying the wandering nomadic clans would literally take in all mages, but that their system would simply be a model to try to improve and replicate[[/note]] and she almost ''always'' gets the last word. Vivienne is also openly [[VanityIsFeminine vain and haughty]], but this is framed as a [[AwesomeEgo character strength]] rather than a [[FatalFlaw flaw]], and no matter what the player's choices Vivienne ''always'' succeeds in her goal of [[spoiler:retoring the Circles with herself at the helm, possibly as this world's equivalent of Fantasy Pope.]]



Added: 506

Changed: 2021

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not all Dalish are haughty bigots. The games and books show frequent examples of Dalish being accepting and city elves revering the Dalish. They vary from clan to clan, individual to individual, like anyone else.


** The Dalish elves (who lead nomadic lives outside human settlements) attempt to invoke this over and over however, even when it's become glaringly obvious that it'll never work. All they have to show for it is more FantasticRacism on both sides of the issue and the destruction of any would-be permanent homeland they tried to establish so far (declaring those unilaterally then flipping off your much bigger human neighbours every time doesn't help). Even the City Elves think the Dalish are full of themselves if Fenris' attitude is any indication.

to:

** The Some Dalish elves (who lead nomadic lives outside human settlements) attempt to invoke this over and over however, even when it's become glaringly obvious that it'll over, but it never work. All they have to show for it is more FantasticRacism on both sides of the issue and the destruction of any would-be permanent homeland they tried to establish so far (declaring those unilaterally then flipping off your much bigger human neighbours every time doesn't help). Even the City Elves think works. While the Dalish are full of themselves if Fenris' attitude is any indication.revere their ancestral elves as TheBeautifulElite and seek to restore their lost culture, they're still seen as barbaric dirt-dwellers by most humans, and dismissed as either heathens and savages or haughty bigots by many fellow city elves. Though this varies from clan to clan.



** While not elves, the qunari are a straighter example of the trope. The general argument presented is that qunari are perfect because they are ordered and the only people we see oppose what they want are either massive strawmen or religious fanatics who see them only as heretics. Even [[PlayerCharacter Hawke]] only gets to call them butchers. It is ignored how they take children away from their parents, force others to accept only one role in life, and are blind to the fact that they might be wrong.

to:

** Vivienne the Orlesian noble and Pro-Circle mage frequently goes on {{Character Filibuster}}s extolling the virtues of her Orlesian [[TheFashionista fashion-consciousness]], [[DeadlyDecadentCourt deadly politics]], and [[TheChurch Chantry]] [[AntiMagicalFaction Circles]] while harshly condemning the inherent dangers and selfishness of mage freedom (despite being a [[{{Hypocrite}} mage who lives outside Circle prison towers herself]]), and neither the Inquisitor nor companions can ''ever'' meaningfully counter-argue.[[note]]For example, Vivienne often claims the [[AntiMagicalFaction Circles]] are a NecessaryEvil to protect mages from being lynched by ordinary citizens who hate and fear them, and the Inquisitor can ''never'' point out how [[PropagandaMachine the Chantry]] encourages most ordinary citizens to hate and fear them enough to lynch them to begin with. Even more egregiously, the Inquisitor can make this same argument later to Chantry Sister Leliana, who ''agrees with them''.[[/note]] The few times they can present a weak rebuttal, Vivienne easily twists their words around to support her own view and almost always gets the last word.
** While not elves, the qunari Qunari are a straighter example of the trope. The general argument presented is that qunari Qunari are perfect because they are ordered and the only people we see oppose what they want are either massive strawmen or religious fanatics who see them only as heretics. Even [[PlayerCharacter Hawke]] only gets to call them butchers. It is ignored how they take children away from their parents, force others to accept only one role in life, and are blind to the fact that they might be wrong.


Added DiffLines:

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Even WW is NotSoAboveItAll sometimes; a particularly infamous example is an incident where she is confronted by an angry mob, the leader of which is an angry heavyset man holding an effigy of her, calling her out for her callous behavior towards the collateral damage supers like her can inflict. Wonder Woman's response? Rope the man with her Lasso of Truth so that he spills about secretly being a crossdresser, ''publicly humiliating him'' and causing the crowd to disperse. While the man was using some rather crass language to describe WW, his point about her carelessness towards innocents [[[[JerkassHasAPoint was nonetheless valid]] but Wonder Woman is depicted as being in the right.

to:

** Even WW is NotSoAboveItAll sometimes; a particularly infamous example is an incident where she is confronted by an angry mob, the leader of which is an angry heavyset man holding an effigy of her, calling her out for her callous callous behavior towards the collateral damage supers like her can inflict. Wonder Woman's response? Rope the man with her Lasso of Truth so that he spills about secretly being a crossdresser, ''publicly humiliating him'' and causing the crowd to disperse. While the man was using some rather crass language to describe WW, his point about her carelessness towards innocents [[[[JerkassHasAPoint [[JerkassHasAPoint was nonetheless valid]] but Wonder Woman is depicted as being in the right.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Even WW is NotSoAboveItAll sometimes; a particularly infamous example is an incident where she is confronted by an angry mob, the leader of which is an angry heavyset man holding an effigy of her, calling her out for her callous behavior towards the collateral damage supers like her can inflict. Wonder Woman's response? Rope the man with her Lasso of Truth so that he spills about secretly being a crossdresser, ''publicly humiliating him'' and causing the crowd to disperse. While the man was using some rather crass language to describe WW, his point about her carelessness towards innocents [[[[JerkassHasAPoint was nonetheless valid]] but Wonder Woman is depicted as being in the right.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''TabletopGame/OldWorldOfDarkness'' [[ZigZaggedTrope zig zags]] between this straight and averting it. On one hand, the Kindred are, individually, superior to humankind: physically stronger, longer-lived, able to regenerate from non-fatal injury, and in possession of unimaginable powers few if any humans ever dare to match, and the supposed ways to kill them (garlic, stake through the heart, running water) are purely hogwash[[note]]except for exposure to sunlight, which ''will'' kill them dead.[[/note]] They've also been secretly controlling and manipulating human society for centuries for their own gain, for as long as there has ''been'' human society. On the other hand, vampires are by no means impervious to being killed with mundane weapons (it just takes a hell of a lot more damage to put them down for good), and humanity ''vastly'' outnumbers theirs, and many fully acknowledge that if humanity rallied against them in any sort of numbers, they would be wiped out completely. As a result, they carefully tend to TheMasquerade, swiftly and severely punishing anyone who violates it, lest humans gain definitive proof of vampires and organize against them.

Top