Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / BanOnPolitics

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
examples should not mention that they provide the page quote


* The page quote is from ''Theatre/MyFairLady'', in which Mrs. Higgens advises Henry to enforce a Ban on Politics to avoid unnecessary drama.

to:

* The page quote is from In ''Theatre/MyFairLady'', in which Mrs. Higgens advises Henry to enforce a Ban on Politics to avoid unnecessary drama.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


[[folder:Western Animation]]
* One episode of ''WesternAnimation/JusticeLeagueUnlimited'' has Captain Marvel praise Lex Luthor, stating he's happy that a villain could [[HeelFaceTurn change his ways]] and run for president. This gets spun by the media into an official endorsement for Lex Luthor's presidency ''from the entire Justice League''. Superman harshly chews out Captain Marvel for this, making it very clear that the Justice League doesn't discuss politics, endorse politicians, or even [[CallBack hock products]], and makes it very clear he's never to do it again.
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
The Drinker's page was cut for being not tropeworthy, so any wicks on trope pages ought to be replaced with a link to his channel.


* WebVideo/TheCriticalDrinker ''heavily'' advises doing this in his "How To Succeed On [=YouTube=]" video, warning that because it's such a tumultuous topic it's guaranteed to lose you fans, no matter what you say. As if to prove his point, even him skirting the line by complaining about movies for getting too political has been interpreted by some as a political stance on his part and sparked criticism against him for it. As evidenced by Jordan's livestreams, he is a conservative but doesn't like to state it out loud on his main channel.

to:

* WebVideo/TheCriticalDrinker [[https://www.youtube.com/@TheCriticalDrinker The Critical Drinker]] ''heavily'' advises doing this in his "How To Succeed On [=YouTube=]" video, warning that because it's such a tumultuous topic it's guaranteed to lose you fans, no matter what you say. As if to prove his point, even him skirting the line by complaining about movies for getting too political has been interpreted by some as a political stance on his part and sparked criticism against him for it. As evidenced by Jordan's livestreams, he is a conservative but doesn't like to state it out loud on his main channel.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


NoPartyGiven is an application that often crops up in fictional portrayals: the characters may be politically active, but their party affiliation is never specified.

to:

NoPartyGiven is an application that often crops up in fictional portrayals: the characters may be politically active, but their party affiliation is never specified.
specified, so everyone is free to assume the leanings of the SleazyPolitician or PresidentEvil’s administration according to their preferred flavor of {{Applicability}}.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


NoPartyGiven is an application that often crops up in fictional portrayals: the characters may be politically active, but their party affiliation is never specified.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WebVideo/TheCriticalDrinker ''heavily'' advises doing this in his "How To Succeed On [=YouTube=]" video, warning that because it's such a tumultuous topic it's guaranteed to lose you fans, no matter what you say. As if to prove his point, even him skirting the line by complaining about movies for getting too political has been interpreted by some as a political stance on his part and sparked criticism against him for it.

to:

* WebVideo/TheCriticalDrinker ''heavily'' advises doing this in his "How To Succeed On [=YouTube=]" video, warning that because it's such a tumultuous topic it's guaranteed to lose you fans, no matter what you say. As if to prove his point, even him skirting the line by complaining about movies for getting too political has been interpreted by some as a political stance on his part and sparked criticism against him for it. As evidenced by Jordan's livestreams, he is a conservative but doesn't like to state it out loud on his main channel.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not entirely accurate - the Rule of Cautious Editing Judgment just says that almost everyone on the site edits cautiously even when it comes to contentious topics, it isn't specifically a ban on political discussion. It's more of a rule in the sense of something that happens naturally, so removing as per ATT.


Around here, we call our version of this the Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Blog/TheComicsCurmudgeon strictly enforces this on both the blog itself and the comment section. Political cartoons like ''ComicStrip/MallardFillmore'' are not reviewed period, and referencing or discussing politics or the aforementioned political comics in comments is a bannable offense. If politics are mentioned in any way, shape, or form, it's just as an obviously [[{{Absurdism}} absurdist]] and exaggeratory joke with no actual comment on real life (e.g., portraying the Keanes from ''ComicStrip/TheFamilyCircus'' as a cult of unhinged Jonestown-esque religious fundamentalists or [[WhatDoYouMeanItsNotDidactic jokingly reading extreme sociopolitical/philosophical commentary]] in strips like ''ComicStrip/DennisTheMenace'').

to:

* Blog/TheComicsCurmudgeon strictly enforces this on both the blog itself and the comment section. Political cartoons like ''ComicStrip/MallardFillmore'' are not reviewed period, and referencing or discussing politics or the aforementioned political comics in comments is a bannable offense. If politics are mentioned in any way, shape, or form, it's just as an obviously [[{{Absurdism}} absurdist]] absurdist and exaggeratory joke with no actual comment on real life (e.g., portraying the Keanes from ''ComicStrip/TheFamilyCircus'' as a cult of unhinged Jonestown-esque religious fundamentalists or [[WhatDoYouMeanItsNotDidactic jokingly reading extreme sociopolitical/philosophical commentary]] in strips like ''ComicStrip/DennisTheMenace''). Notably, he once did an entry where he ''did'' review some political strips just to prove the point of ''why'' he doesn't bother with them; every single one he shows is a stupid, unfunny AuthorTract that is so [[ConfirmationBias incomprehensible and out-of-touch to anyone who doesn't follow the exact same school of thought as it's writer]] that they're nearly impossible to mock in a way that's entertaining. He ''can'' dissect and criticize them, spelling out why they're so terrible, but not in a way that's funny, [[RuleOfFunny which is what's really important to this blog]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WebVideo/TheCriticalDrinker ''heavily'' advises doing this in his "How To Succeed On [=YouTube=]" video, warning that because it's such a tumultuous topic it's guaranteed to lose you fans, no matter what you say.

to:

* WebVideo/TheCriticalDrinker ''heavily'' advises doing this in his "How To Succeed On [=YouTube=]" video, warning that because it's such a tumultuous topic it's guaranteed to lose you fans, no matter what you say. As if to prove his point, even him skirting the line by complaining about movies for getting too political has been interpreted by some as a political stance on his part and sparked criticism against him for it.

Added: 734

Changed: 114

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Jim Davis refuses to put any sociopolitical discussion in ''ComicStrip/{{Garfield}}'', as it's meant to just be a funny entertainment strip about a fat lazy cat. As explained in his About Me section in ''Garfield Weighs In'':

to:

* Jim Davis refuses to put any sociopolitical discussion in ''ComicStrip/{{Garfield}}'', as it's meant to just be a funny entertainment strip about a fat lazy cat.cat, and thus any attempt at commenting on the global situation would be [[CluelessAesop painfully clueless]] at best. As explained in his About Me section in ''Garfield Weighs In'':


Added DiffLines:

* Blog/TheComicsCurmudgeon strictly enforces this on both the blog itself and the comment section. Political cartoons like ''ComicStrip/MallardFillmore'' are not reviewed period, and referencing or discussing politics or the aforementioned political comics in comments is a bannable offense. If politics are mentioned in any way, shape, or form, it's just as an obviously [[{{Absurdism}} absurdist]] and exaggeratory joke with no actual comment on real life (e.g., portraying the Keanes from ''ComicStrip/TheFamilyCircus'' as a cult of unhinged Jonestown-esque religious fundamentalists or [[WhatDoYouMeanItsNotDidactic jokingly reading extreme sociopolitical/philosophical commentary]] in strips like ''ComicStrip/DennisTheMenace'').
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WebVideo/TheCriticalDrinker ''heavily'' advises this in his "How To Succeed On [=YouTube=]" video, warning that because it's such a tumultuous topic it's guaranteed to lose you fans, no matter what you say.

to:

* WebVideo/TheCriticalDrinker ''heavily'' advises doing this in his "How To Succeed On [=YouTube=]" video, warning that because it's such a tumultuous topic it's guaranteed to lose you fans, no matter what you say.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WebVideo/TheCriticalDrinker ''heavily'' advises this in his "How To Succeed On YouTube" video, warning that because it's such a tumultuous topic it's guaranteed to lose you fans, no matter what you say.

to:

* WebVideo/TheCriticalDrinker ''heavily'' advises this in his "How To Succeed On YouTube" [=YouTube=]" video, warning that because it's such a tumultuous topic it's guaranteed to lose you fans, no matter what you say.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* WebVideo/TheCriticalDrinker ''heavily'' advises this in his "How To Succeed On YouTube" video, warning that because it's such a tumultuous topic it's guaranteed to lose you fans, no matter what you say.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Ironically, the opposite of this trope is not too rare either. Meaning it is permissible to talk about ''current'' political events, but against the (written or unwritten) rules to talk about ''general'' political issues. This is likely because if you take a general political topic, like UsefulNotes/{{socialism}} vs. conservatism ([[UsefulNotes/PoliticalIdeologies or other types of ideologies]]), it will often be the same old forum members who come up with the same old arguments that they cannot account for and use them as an excuse to flame each other (or new members who interfere by doing the same or are ganged up on by older members). While with a current political issue, it is often easier to research it thoroughly and have some facts to back your arguments up and there is a fair chance that the discussion will stop once the issue stops being commonly brought up in the media, while the formerly mentioned discussion of socialism vs. conservatism will likely continue as long as humankind is alive. Similarly, debates about concrete issues can be based on concrete facts - general debates tend to be based much more on feelings and philosophical / ideological differences.

to:

Ironically, the opposite of this trope is not too rare either. Meaning it is permissible to talk about ''current'' political events, but against the (written or unwritten) rules to talk about ''general'' political issues. This is likely because if you take a general political topic, like UsefulNotes/{{socialism}} vs. conservatism ([[UsefulNotes/PoliticalIdeologies or other types of ideologies]]), it will often be the same old forum members who come up with the same old arguments that they cannot account for and use them as an excuse to flame each other (or new members who interfere by doing the same or are ganged up on by older members). While with a current political issue, it is often easier to research it thoroughly and have some facts to back your arguments up and there is a fair chance that the discussion will stop once the issue stops being commonly brought up in the media, while the formerly mentioned discussion of socialism vs. conservatism will likely continue as long as humankind is alive. Similarly, debates about concrete issues can be based on concrete facts - general debates tend to be based much more on feelings and philosophical / ideological philosophical/ideological differences.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Webcomic/ShotAndChaser'': While they allude to the dangers and annoyances of the politicized response to the pandemic Tre and Olly keep cutting themselves off whenever politics come up as they're trying to have "[[{{Tagline}} one good day]]" and thus discussions of politics are off the table.

to:

* ''Webcomic/ShotAndChaser'': While they allude to the dangers and annoyances of the politicized response to the pandemic Tre and Olly keep cutting cut themselves off whenever politics come up as they're trying to have "[[{{Tagline}} one good day]]" and thus discussions of politics are off the table.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[folder:Webcomics]]
* ''Webcomic/ShotAndChaser'': While they allude to the dangers and annoyances of the politicized response to the pandemic Tre and Olly keep cutting themselves off whenever politics come up as they're trying to have "[[{{Tagline}} one good day]]" and thus discussions of politics are off the table.
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[folder:Comic Strips]]
* Jim Davis refuses to put any sociopolitical discussion in ''ComicStrip/{{Garfield}}'', as it's meant to just be a funny entertainment strip about a fat lazy cat. As explained in his About Me section in ''Garfield Weighs In'':
--> Garfield consciously avoids any social or political comment. My grasp of the world situation isn't that firm anyway. For years, I thought OPEC was a denture adhesive.
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''VideoGame/GenshinImpact'', a Chinese game, disabled player statuses in international servers for the weeks surrounding June 4 in 2021 as a preemptive measure to avoid any mention of the anniversary of the Tiananmen Square incident.

to:

* ''VideoGame/GenshinImpact'', a Chinese game, disabled the editing of player statuses in international servers and nicknames for the weeks surrounding June 4 in 2021 as a preemptive measure to avoid any mention of the anniversary of the Tiananmen Square incident.

Top