Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
This is untrue.
The film was scrapped in 1997 due to it having a Troubled Production, Amblimation shutting down, and the film's staff joining Dreamworks. The reason why the 2019 film went for live-action is likely due to Tom Hooper and the new crew having a different creative vision for it than a film by Spielberg that was canceled 22 years ago, rather some devious scheme to appease to the Academy's tastes.
The film was scrapped in 1997 due to it having a Troubled Production, Amblimation shutting down, and the film's staff joining Dreamworks. The reason why the 2019 film went for live-action is likely due to Tom Hooper and the new crew having a different creative vision for it than a film by Spielberg that was canceled 22 years ago, rather some devious scheme to appease to the Academy's tastes.Deleted line(s) 188 (click to see context) :
* It's been hypothesized that the only reason that Creator/{{Amblimation}}'s [[WhatCouldHaveBeen proposed]] {{animated adaptation}} of ''Film/{{Cats}}'' fell through, despite the near-universal consensus that it would have been a more appropriate medium to adapt the show into than [[UnintentionalUncannyValley the hyper-realistic, CGI-heavy live-action movie we eventually got]], was because Universal attempted to [[AwardBait guarantee Oscar prestige]] by deliberately kowtowing to the Academy of Arts and Sciences' [[BiasSteamroller unflinching preference for gritty, realistic live-action and prejudice towards animation]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Restored example.
Added DiffLines:
* Science museums [[http://boingboing.net/2011/09/23/science-museums-are-failing-grown-ups.html have the same problem]], being seen as mainly for children. Adult science enthusiasts have to settle for books, magazines and TV programs like Nova or a streaming service like Curiosity Stream, which don't offer the hands-on experiences that museum exhibits do.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
needlessly sensationalist word cruft + if it's averted it's just not used
Deleted line(s) 75 (click to see context) :
*** Averted like ''[[{{Pun}} bloody]]'' hell with the Mexican Spanish dub of ''Manga/DanceInTheVampireBund'': You know, a series infamous for having a ''[[ReallySevenHundredYearsOld underage-looking vampire]]'' as the main protagonist who had a crush on her older-looking werewolf bodyguard and gets undressed ''many times'', that the American version was edited because of that. One could think the Mexican version could have used the American version, since it's safer and cheaper than the original Japanese version. They used the uncensored Japanese version instead.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 270 (click to see context) from:
** The most common complaint about the ''World of Warcraft'' expansion, ''Mists Of Pandaria'' is the fact that the areas are brightly colored and features a lot of talking animals, starring the talking pandas, the Pandarens. Many people even took one look at the Pandarens and jumped headlong into the idea that Blizzard ripped off the concept of ''WesternAnimation/KungFuPanda'' (despite the Pandaren being introduced in ''Warcraft 3'', which was released years before the first ''Kung-Fu Panda'' movie). This despite the fact that the expansion is not too much lighter in terms of story than the others.
to:
** The most common complaint about the ''World of Warcraft'' expansion, ''Mists Of Pandaria'' is the fact that the areas are brightly colored and features a lot of talking animals, starring the talking pandas, the Pandarens. Many people even took one look at the Pandarens and jumped headlong into the idea that Blizzard ripped off the concept of ''WesternAnimation/KungFuPanda'' ''WesternAnimation/KungFuPanda1'' (despite the Pandaren being introduced in ''Warcraft 3'', which was released years before the first ''Kung-Fu Panda'' movie). This despite the fact that the expansion is not too much lighter in terms of story than the others.
