Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / AmericaWinsTheWar

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Arguably, invading the Soviet Union in 1941 was sensible given Soviet modernization and armament progress till then, and how far the Axis went


* In the ''JusticeLeague'' episode, "The Savage Time," the immortal supervillain, Vandal Savage, manages to send a laptop full of technical information for superweapons to himself during World War II. There was also a video recording message telling himself what to do with the info, such as usurp Hitler and a specific warning to ready the Third Reich for a massive US/UK/Canada seaborne invasion of Normandy on June 6th, 1944. While the success of Operation Overlord in 1944 was definitely very bad news for Germany, wouldn't a specific warning not to invade the Soviet Union in 1941 before neutralizing the Western enemies first have been a higher priority?
** The laptop he sent back in time could have arrived ''years'' before 1945 (the Martian says it). Savage had enough time to set himself up as a revolutionary scientist, prove his new weapons, and then remove Hitler. Since there's no mention made of the Soviets, one could assume he never invaded the USSR, and was instead focusing on the center of Allied supply lines, the US.

to:

* In the ''JusticeLeague'' episode, "The Savage Time," the immortal supervillain, Vandal Savage, manages to send a laptop full of technical information for superweapons to himself during World War II. There was also a video recording message telling himself what to do with the info, such as usurp Hitler and a specific warning to ready the Third Reich for a massive US/UK/Canada seaborne invasion of Normandy on June 6th, 1944. While the success of Operation Overlord in 1944 was definitely very bad news for Germany, wouldn't a specific warning not to invade why no mention of the Soviet Union in 1941 before neutralizing Union's offensive at the Western enemies first have been a higher priority?
same time in the East?
** The laptop he sent back in time could have arrived ''years'' before 1945 (the Martian says it). Savage had enough time to set himself up as a revolutionary scientist, prove his new weapons, and then remove Hitler. Since there's no mention made of the Soviets, one could assume he never invaded the USSR, USSR or instead had already destroyed them, and was instead focusing on the center of Allied supply lines, the US.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Yahtzee makes a decent point, but he\'s unnecessarily inflamatory, biased, rude, and generally not the best choice to make it.


*** [[WebAnimation/ZeroPunctuation Yahtzee]] went and both analyzed and deconstructed this trope during his review of ''Airborne'':
--> "So why does the US have such a fascination about [[NeverLiveItDown a time that everyone else would rather just forget about and move on]]? Well, probably because that was the last war in which they did any good; when they had a clear win over an [[BlackAndWhiteMorality unambiguously evil villain]] [[ClassicVillain who posed a genuine threat]], rather than any of these [[OvershadowedByControversy wishy-washy]] [[TheWarOnTerror recent wars]] where they just [[{{Eagleland}} run in, stomp all over a developing nation and run out again declaring victory]] around the time the population have to start ''[[NightmareFuel eating their own dead]]''."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
The campaigns against Japan in 1945 are viewed as part and parcle of the Great Patriotic War


Keep in mind that despite having the name "America Wins The War," this is '''not''' a strictly American trope. The British can and will exaggerate ''their'' role in the war as well, with an additional jab that the Americans were not only late to the party but also stole all the credit, and additionally only joined in when they knew who was going to win. Russia also this; there, you'll find claims that WWII lasted from June 22, 1941 to May 9, 1945--when this was actually just the duration of the war between the USSR and Germany, known as the "Great Patriotic War". (However, this mixing up of the Second World War and the Great Patriotic War also sells the Soviet Union short, in that it ignores their successful campaigns against Japan in 1939 and late 1945). In short, many countries have tried to play up their part in the war at the expense of others and such examples are more than welcome.

to:

Keep in mind that despite having the name "America Wins The War," this is '''not''' a strictly American trope. The British can and will exaggerate ''their'' role in the war as well, with an additional jab that the Americans were not only late to the party but also stole all the credit, and additionally only joined in when they knew who was going to win. Russia also this; there, you'll find claims that WWII lasted from June 22, 1941 to May 9, 1945--when this was actually just the duration of the war between the USSR and Germany, known as the "Great Patriotic War". (However, this mixing up of the Second World War and the Great Patriotic War also Germany, (which ironically sells the Soviet Union short, in that it ignores short because their successful campaigns against Japan in 1939 and late 1945).1945 aren't included in that time frame). In short, many countries have tried to play up their part in the war at the expense of others and such examples are more than welcome.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Also in Pearl Harbor, one character picks up the phone to report the December 1941 bombing of the titular base and says ''"I think World War Two just started!". Cue rolled eyes around the world
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Keep in mind that despite having the name "America Wins The War," this is '''not''' a strictly American trope. The British can and will exaggerate ''their'' role in the war as well, with an additional jab that the Americans were not only late to the party but also stole all the credit, and additionally only joined in when they knew who was going to win. Even Russia does this; there, you'll find claims that WWII lasted from June 22, 1941 to May 9, 1945--when this was actually just the duration of the war between the USSR and Germany, known as the "Great Patriotic War". (However, this mixing up of the Second World War and the Great Patriotic War also sells the Soviet Union short, in that it ignores their successful campaigns against Japan in 1939 and late 1945). In short, many countries have tried to play up their part in the war at the expense of others and such examples are more than welcome.

to:

Keep in mind that despite having the name "America Wins The War," this is '''not''' a strictly American trope. The British can and will exaggerate ''their'' role in the war as well, with an additional jab that the Americans were not only late to the party but also stole all the credit, and additionally only joined in when they knew who was going to win. Even Russia does also this; there, you'll find claims that WWII lasted from June 22, 1941 to May 9, 1945--when this was actually just the duration of the war between the USSR and Germany, known as the "Great Patriotic War". (However, this mixing up of the Second World War and the Great Patriotic War also sells the Soviet Union short, in that it ignores their successful campaigns against Japan in 1939 and late 1945). In short, many countries have tried to play up their part in the war at the expense of others and such examples are more than welcome.

Added DiffLines:

** Which was deeply ironic, coming from a [[NationalStereotypes Italian-American]]....
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Kuomintang is the official spelling


Some see this general 'limited scope' thing as extending to the "official" date of the war's beginning, September 1st, 1939, the date of Germany's invasion of Poland. Most, however, accept that the moniker of 'World War' denotes merely the geography of a war (the British Empire alone spanned three continents at the time), rather than [[UnfortunateImplications implying the conflict wasn't 'serious' or something]] ([[ImperialJapan the Japan of the time]], and many Japanese ultranationalists since, call it [[InsistentTerminology 'The China Incident']]). Though bloody and horrific in its own right[[note]]With casualties to the tune of at least 15 and as many as 30 million, as well as an impressive gamut of war-crimes like mass-rape (e.g. Nanjing) and live-human-experimentation[[/note]], the war that [[ChiangKaiShek Chiang Kai-Shek's]] [[UsefulNotes/NoMoreEmperors Guomindang]] waged against ImperialJapan wasn't part of the 'World War' [[WorldWarTwo until The Imperial Navy lashed out to take Malaya and the Philippines]].

to:

Some see this general 'limited scope' thing as extending to the "official" date of the war's beginning, September 1st, 1939, the date of Germany's invasion of Poland. Most, however, accept that the moniker of 'World War' denotes merely the geography of a war (the British Empire alone spanned three continents at the time), rather than [[UnfortunateImplications implying the conflict wasn't 'serious' or something]] ([[ImperialJapan the Japan of the time]], and many Japanese ultranationalists since, call it [[InsistentTerminology 'The China Incident']]). Though bloody and horrific in its own right[[note]]With casualties to the tune of at least 15 and as many as 30 million, as well as an impressive gamut of war-crimes like mass-rape (e.g. Nanjing) and live-human-experimentation[[/note]], the war that [[ChiangKaiShek Chiang Kai-Shek's]] [[UsefulNotes/NoMoreEmperors Guomindang]] Kuomintang]] waged against ImperialJapan wasn't part of the 'World War' [[WorldWarTwo until The Imperial Navy lashed out to take Malaya and the Philippines]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Hetalia: Set in in WWII. America's plan to defeat Germany? All the other Allies support him while he wins the war. "I'm the Hero!"

to:

* Hetalia: AxisPowersHetalia: Set in in WWII. America's plan to defeat Germany? All the other Allies support him while he wins the war. "I'm the Hero!"

Added: 26

Changed: 21

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[folder:Comicbooks]]

to:

[[folder:Comicbooks]]
[[folder:Anime and Manga]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None




Added DiffLines:

* Hetalia: Set in in WWII. America's plan to defeat Germany? All the other Allies support him while he wins the war. "I'm the Hero!"
[[/folder]]

[[folder:Comicbooks]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


America Wins The War is a form of HollywoodHistory in which a story implies or outright states that the United States single-handedly won WorldWarII[[hottip:*: To be fair, the USA 'did' provide the USSR with over an eighth of their total armaments during the war, and as much as a quarter of their food and other (rare) materials. Still, there is a certain imbalance of 'blood' versus 'iron' spent to achieve victory, one very much in the USSR's favour with 10+ million Soviet Military and 12+ million Soviet Civilian casualties versus 3 million suffered by The Commonwealth and France and the USA. German casualties stood at 7+ million, for comparison]] Sometimes, it's [[UnfortunateImplications unintentional]]; the viewpoint or focus is simply too narrow for the audience to be reminded of the bigger picture. Other times, though, it's a blatant example of HollywoodHistory.

to:

America Wins The War is a form of HollywoodHistory in which a story implies or outright states that the United States single-handedly won WorldWarII[[hottip:*: To UsefulNotes/WorldWarII.[[note]]To be fair, the USA 'did' provide the USSR with over an eighth of their total armaments during the war, and as much as a quarter of their food and other (rare) materials. Still, there is a certain imbalance of 'blood' versus 'iron' spent to achieve victory, one very much in the USSR's favour with 10+ million Soviet Military and 12+ million Soviet Civilian casualties versus 3 million suffered by The Commonwealth and France and the USA. German casualties stood at 7+ million, for comparison]] comparison.[[/note]] Sometimes, it's [[UnfortunateImplications unintentional]]; the viewpoint or focus is simply too narrow for the audience to be reminded of the bigger picture. Other times, though, it's a blatant example of HollywoodHistory.



The D-Day landings are another good example. Many American-made productions will focus solely on Omaha Beach, the most heavily fortified of the four landing sites as well as the best-defended--both facts which Allied intelligence failed to realize prior to the operation. The carnage that ensued is a favourite among producers, since it emphasizes the sacrifice Americans made during the war--but doing so gives the impression that Omaha Beach was ''the'' decisive turning point that led to the Allied victory in Europe. (The focus on Omaha Beach is also partially because ''SavingPrivateRyan'' did it, [[FollowTheLeader other games/movies/TV shows want to replicate its success]], and because it's more exciting to show a strongly opposed landing than an unopposed one -- not that the other landings were exactly 'unopposed' (For instance, Canadian troops landing at Juno Beach on that day faced opposition almost as formidable and made better progress towards their objectives in spite of it[[hottip:*: Due to better small-unit communication and leadership, something the military training of smaller nation-states tends to emphasize given their lesser material resources]]), but still.

to:

The D-Day landings are another good example. Many American-made productions will focus solely on Omaha Beach, the most heavily fortified of the four landing sites as well as the best-defended--both facts which Allied intelligence failed to realize prior to the operation. The carnage that ensued is a favourite among producers, since it emphasizes the sacrifice Americans made during the war--but doing so gives the impression that Omaha Beach was ''the'' decisive turning point that led to the Allied victory in Europe. (The focus on Omaha Beach is also partially because ''SavingPrivateRyan'' did it, [[FollowTheLeader other games/movies/TV shows want to replicate its success]], and because it's more exciting to show a strongly opposed landing than an unopposed one -- not that the other landings were exactly 'unopposed' (For instance, Canadian troops landing at Juno Beach on that day faced opposition almost as formidable and made better progress towards their objectives in spite of it[[hottip:*: Due it[[note]]Due to better small-unit communication and leadership, something the military training of smaller nation-states tends to emphasize given their lesser material resources]]), resources[[/note]]), but still.



Some see this general 'limited scope' thing as extending to the "official" date of the war's beginning, September 1st, 1939, the date of Germany's invasion of Poland. Most, however, accept that the moniker of 'World War' denotes merely the geography of a war (the British Empire alone spanned three continents at the time), rather than [[UnfortunateImplications implying the conflict wasn't 'serious' or something]] ([[ImperialJapan the Japan of the time]], and many Japanese ultranationalists since, call it [[InsistentTerminology 'The China Incident']]). Though bloody and horrific in its own right[[hottip:*: With casualties to the tune of at least 15 and as many as 30 million, as well as an impressive gamut of war-crimes like mass-rape (e.g. Nanjing) and live-human-experimentation]], the war that [[ChiangKaiShek Chiang Kai-Shek's]] [[UsefulNotes/NoMoreEmperors Guomindang]] waged against ImperialJapan wasn't part of the 'World War' [[WorldWarTwo until The Imperial Navy lashed out to take Malaya and the Philippines]].

to:

Some see this general 'limited scope' thing as extending to the "official" date of the war's beginning, September 1st, 1939, the date of Germany's invasion of Poland. Most, however, accept that the moniker of 'World War' denotes merely the geography of a war (the British Empire alone spanned three continents at the time), rather than [[UnfortunateImplications implying the conflict wasn't 'serious' or something]] ([[ImperialJapan the Japan of the time]], and many Japanese ultranationalists since, call it [[InsistentTerminology 'The China Incident']]). Though bloody and horrific in its own right[[hottip:*: With right[[note]]With casualties to the tune of at least 15 and as many as 30 million, as well as an impressive gamut of war-crimes like mass-rape (e.g. Nanjing) and live-human-experimentation]], live-human-experimentation[[/note]], the war that [[ChiangKaiShek Chiang Kai-Shek's]] [[UsefulNotes/NoMoreEmperors Guomindang]] waged against ImperialJapan wasn't part of the 'World War' [[WorldWarTwo until The Imperial Navy lashed out to take Malaya and the Philippines]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Subverted in ''Film/IngloriousBasterds'': the trailers suggested that the movie would be about a bunch of US special forces guys killing Germans in occupied Europe, but the main plot of the film is about the cat-and-mouse game between a vengeful French Jewess and a MagnificentBastard Austrian SS man (mostly in subtitled French and German) and the US special forces guys are the comic relief B-plot.

to:

* Subverted in ''Film/IngloriousBasterds'': ''Film/InglouriousBasterds'': the trailers suggested that the movie would be about a bunch of US special forces guys killing Germans in occupied Europe, but the main plot of the film is about the cat-and-mouse game between a vengeful French Jewess and a MagnificentBastard Austrian SS man (mostly in subtitled French and German) and the US special forces guys are the comic relief B-plot.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Subverted in ''Film/IngloriousBasterds'': the trailers suggested that the movie would be about a bunch of US special forces guys killing Germans in occupied Europe, but the main plot of the film is about the cat-and-mouse game between a vengeful French Jewess and a MagnificentBastard Austrian SS man (mostly in subtitled French and German) and the US special forces guys are the comic relief B-plot.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Series/TheRatPatrol'' was licensed in the UK but taken off air due to the volume of complaints received about its exaggeration of the American involvement in what had been primarily a UK and Commonwealth theatre.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


--> "So why does the US have such a fascination about [[NeverLiveItDown a time that everyone else would rather just forget about and move on]]? Well, probably because that was the last war in which they did any good; when they had a clear win over an [[BlackAndWhiteMorality unambiguously evil villain]] [[ClassicVillain who posed a genuine threat]], rather than any of these [[OvershadowedByControversy wishy-washy recent wars]] where they just [[{{Eagleland}} run in, stomp all over a developing nation and run out again declaring victory]] around the time the population have to start ''[[NightmareFuel eating their own dead]]''."

to:

--> "So why does the US have such a fascination about [[NeverLiveItDown a time that everyone else would rather just forget about and move on]]? Well, probably because that was the last war in which they did any good; when they had a clear win over an [[BlackAndWhiteMorality unambiguously evil villain]] [[ClassicVillain who posed a genuine threat]], rather than any of these [[OvershadowedByControversy wishy-washy wishy-washy]] [[TheWarOnTerror recent wars]] where they just [[{{Eagleland}} run in, stomp all over a developing nation and run out again declaring victory]] around the time the population have to start ''[[NightmareFuel eating their own dead]]''."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


--> "So why does the US have such a fascination about [[NeverLiveItDown a time that everyone else would rather just forget about and move on]]? Well, probably because that was the last war in which they did any good; when they had a clear win over an [[BlackAndWhiteMorality unambiguously evil villain]] [[ClassicVillain who posed a genuine threat]], rather than any of these [[OvershadowedByControversy wishy-washy recent wars]] where they just [[{{Eagleland}} run in, stomp all over a developing nation and run out again declaring victory}} around the time the population have to start ''[[NightmareFuel eating their own dead]]''."

to:

--> "So why does the US have such a fascination about [[NeverLiveItDown a time that everyone else would rather just forget about and move on]]? Well, probably because that was the last war in which they did any good; when they had a clear win over an [[BlackAndWhiteMorality unambiguously evil villain]] [[ClassicVillain who posed a genuine threat]], rather than any of these [[OvershadowedByControversy wishy-washy recent wars]] where they just [[{{Eagleland}} run in, stomp all over a developing nation and run out again declaring victory}} victory]] around the time the population have to start ''[[NightmareFuel eating their own dead]]''."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


--> "So why does the US have such a fascination about [[NeverLiveItDown a time that everyone else would rather just forget about and move on]]? Well, probably because that was the last war in which they did any good; when they had a clear win over an [[BlackAndWhiteMoralith unambiguously evil villain]] [[ClassicVillain who posed a genuine threat]], rather than any of these [[OvershadowedByControversy wishy-washy recent wars]] where they just [[{{Eagleland}} run in, stomp all over a developing nation and run out again declaring victory}} around the time the population have to start ''[[NightmareFuel eating their own dead]]''."

to:

--> "So why does the US have such a fascination about [[NeverLiveItDown a time that everyone else would rather just forget about and move on]]? Well, probably because that was the last war in which they did any good; when they had a clear win over an [[BlackAndWhiteMoralith [[BlackAndWhiteMorality unambiguously evil villain]] [[ClassicVillain who posed a genuine threat]], rather than any of these [[OvershadowedByControversy wishy-washy recent wars]] where they just [[{{Eagleland}} run in, stomp all over a developing nation and run out again declaring victory}} around the time the population have to start ''[[NightmareFuel eating their own dead]]''."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** [[WebAnimation/ZeroPunctuation Yahtzee's]] review went and analyzed and deconstructed this trope during his review of ''Airborne'':
--> "So why does the US have such a fascination about [[NeverLiveItDown a time that everyone else would rather just forget about and move on]]? Well, probably because that was the last war in which they did any good; when they had a clear win over an [[ClassicVillain unambiguously evil villain who posed a genuine threat]], rather than any of these [[OvershadowedByControversy wishy-washy recent wars]] where they just run in, stomp all over a developing nation and run out again declaring victory around the time the population have to start eating their own dead."

to:

*** [[WebAnimation/ZeroPunctuation Yahtzee's]] review Yahtzee]] went and both analyzed and deconstructed this trope during his review of ''Airborne'':
--> "So why does the US have such a fascination about [[NeverLiveItDown a time that everyone else would rather just forget about and move on]]? Well, probably because that was the last war in which they did any good; when they had a clear win over an [[ClassicVillain [[BlackAndWhiteMoralith unambiguously evil villain villain]] [[ClassicVillain who posed a genuine threat]], rather than any of these [[OvershadowedByControversy wishy-washy recent wars]] where they just [[{{Eagleland}} run in, stomp all over a developing nation and run out again declaring victory victory}} around the time the population have to start ''[[NightmareFuel eating their own dead.dead]]''."

Added: 681

Changed: 248

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Expanded the Wolfenstein entry


* ''[[ReturnToCastleWolfenstein Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory]]'' allows you to play as one of two sides: one is UsefulNotes/NaziGermany, guess who the other is? Considering you know how the war turns out the implication is a given.

to:

* The Wolfenstein series is about American soldier B.J. Blazkowicz taking on the nazis [[OneManArmy all by himself]].
**
''[[ReturnToCastleWolfenstein Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory]]'' allows you to play as one of two sides: one is UsefulNotes/NaziGermany, guess who the other is? Considering you know how the war turns out the implication is a given.given. In this specific case, however, it's probably less an intentional use of this trope, and more paralleling the singleplayer games.
** 2009 release ''VideoGame/{{Wolfenstein}}'' can be said to subvert this. While you are still American OneManArmy B.J. Blazkowicz, the assistance of the German resistance is necessary and invaluable to your success, which also nicely averts the common AllGermansAreNazis trope that appears so often in nazi-based FPSs.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The film does tend to focus on the American sectors, especially Omaha beach (with some justification, given the intensity of the fighting and the numbers of Americans vs. other Allies involved on June 6, 1944), and the Canadians are nowhere to be seen. Also, it is one of several major Hollywood movies focusing on the Western front very much to the exclusion of developments on the Eastern front, which prevents an incomplete picture even for 1944, when the crushing Soviet summer offensive was co-ordinated with the Normandy landing.

to:

** The film does tend to focus on the American sectors, especially Omaha beach (with some justification, given the intensity of the fighting and the numbers of Americans vs. other Allies involved on June 6, 1944), and the Canadians are nowhere to be seen. Also, it is one of several major Hollywood movies focusing on the Western front very much to the exclusion of developments on the Eastern front, which prevents an incomplete picture even for 1944, when the crushing Soviet summer offensive was co-ordinated coordinated with the Normandy landing.



* Thoroughly averted in ''Patton'', despite some would have you believe. Yes, the film focuses on the deeds of George S. Patton throughout World War II, but Patton does not single-handedly curb stomp the Nazis. His rivalry with British general Bernard Law Montgomery features prominently, and he expresses frustration when resources are diverted to important British operations rather than his own. He is just as much upset by the Soviets conquering Berlin and being the ones to force Nazi Germany to surrender.

to:

* Thoroughly averted in ''Patton'', despite what some would have you believe. Yes, the film focuses on the deeds of George S. Patton throughout World War II, but Patton does not single-handedly curb stomp the Nazis. His rivalry with British general Bernard Law Montgomery features prominently, and he expresses frustration when resources are diverted to important British operations rather than his own. He is just as much upset by the Soviets conquering Berlin and being the ones to force Nazi Germany to surrender.

Added: 299

Changed: 681

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
No, this is not \"pretty much played straight\" just because the protagonist is an American general.


* Played pretty much straight in ''Patton'', which plays up George S. Patton's acrimonious rivalry with Montgomery and his antipathy towards the Soviet Union. Here Patton also boasts that America had never experienced defeat while addressing his troops. (Historian Shelby Foote in Ken Burns' Civil War series pointed out the irony of this, given that Patton's grandfather had been a Confederate officer and so of course had experienced defeat).

to:

* Played pretty much straight Thoroughly averted in ''Patton'', which plays up despite some would have you believe. Yes, the film focuses on the deeds of George S. Patton's acrimonious Patton throughout World War II, but Patton does not single-handedly curb stomp the Nazis. His rivalry with British general Bernard Law Montgomery features prominently, and he expresses frustration when resources are diverted to important British operations rather than his antipathy towards own. He is just as much upset by the Soviet Union. Here Soviets conquering Berlin and being the ones to force Nazi Germany to surrender.
** Early in the film,
Patton also boasts that America had never experienced defeat while addressing his troops. (Historian Historian Shelby Foote in Ken Burns' ''The Civil War War'' series pointed out the irony of this, given that Patton's grandfather had been a Confederate officer and so certainly lost a war of course had experienced defeat).his own.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Averted in ''TheGunsOfNavarone''. It was about an Allied commando team, consisting of a New Zealander, an American, a Greek, a Scot, and another Brit. They were sent on their mission by the British army, to destroy enemy guns threatening British ships, that were on their way to rescue British soldiers. The blurb on the movie tie-in edition said something along the lines of "They had to succeed where the entire ''U.S. Navy'' had failed!" This story is based on the SAS attack lead by Paddy Mayne against the guns at Sicily prior to Allied invasion of the Island.

to:

* Averted in ''TheGunsOfNavarone''.''Literature/TheGunsOfNavarone''. It was about an Allied commando team, consisting of a New Zealander, an American, a Greek, a Scot, and another Brit. They were sent on their mission by the British army, to destroy enemy guns threatening British ships, that were on their way to rescue British soldiers. The blurb on the movie tie-in edition said something along the lines of "They had to succeed where the entire ''U.S. Navy'' had failed!" This story is based on the SAS attack lead by Paddy Mayne against the guns at Sicily prior to Allied invasion of the Island.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Averted in the 1961 adaptation of ''TheGunsOfNavarone''. The team consisted of a American (Mallory), two Brits (Franklin and Miller), two Greeks (Stavros and Pappadimos) and one person of unknown nationality ("Butcher" Brown, played by Welshman Stanley Baker).

to:

* Averted in the 1961 adaptation of ''TheGunsOfNavarone''.''Film/TheGunsOfNavarone''. The team consisted of a American (Mallory), two Brits (Franklin and Miller), two Greeks (Stavros and Pappadimos) and one person of unknown nationality ("Butcher" Brown, played by Welshman Stanley Baker).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Parodied in [[ScandinaviaandtheWorld Scandinavia and the World]], where [[http://satwcomic.com/better-late-than-never America believes that he single-handedly saved all of the other countries]] during World War II, despite the fact that [[http://satwcomic.com/america-has-spoken he didn't even know what was going on.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


--> '''[[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons Homer Simpson]]''' to some British citizens, "The Regina Monologues"

to:

--> -->-- '''[[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons Homer Simpson]]''' to some British citizens, "The Regina Monologues"

Changed: 205

Removed: 86

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


->''This country never has lost a war\\
From days of William Penn,\\
We did it before, we'll do it again.''
-->-- "We Did It Before" ([[WarOf1812 Historically Dubious]] American WorldWarII song)

to:

->''This country never has lost a war\\
From days of William Penn,\\
->''"[[ArtisticLicenseHistory We did it before, we'll do it again.''
-->-- "We Did It Before" ([[WarOf1812 Historically Dubious]] American WorldWarII song)
saved your ass in Vietnam!]]"''
--> '''[[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons Homer Simpson]]''' to some British citizens, "The Regina Monologues"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Series/ThePacific'' earned some minor controversy in Australia after the tv station that aired the show advertised it as the 'fight for Australia', despite Australia doing well enough on it's own against the Japanese Army.
** In the show itself J P Morgan causes a fight with some Australia troops by disrespecting the Australians and claiming that the USA was saving them from having 'chopsticks up their ass'.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''VideoGame/CompanyOfHeroes'' plays it straight in the first game. The main campaign for the game follows the US Army from D-Day onwards.
** The expansion campaign ''Opposing Fronts'' has one campaign as the German Army as they steamroll the British airborne during Operation Market Garden.
** The sequel is on the Eastern Front for the first time, following the Russians during the Stalingrad campaign.

Changed: 14

Removed: 70

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Interestingly author/screenwriter {{George MacDonald Fraser}}, who had been an infantryman in Burma during the war, said in his book ''Hollywood History'' that he rather liked ''Objective, Burma!' and that at least American troops had fought in that theater.

to:

** Interestingly author/screenwriter {{George MacDonald Fraser}}, Creator/GeorgeMacDonaldFraser, who had been an infantryman in Burma during the war, said in his book ''Hollywood History'' that he rather liked ''Objective, Burma!' and that at least American troops had fought in that theater.



----
<<|HollywoodHistory|>>
<<|NationalStereotypingTropes|>>
<<|WorldWarII|>>

to:

----
<<|HollywoodHistory|>>
<<|NationalStereotypingTropes|>>
<<|WorldWarII|>>
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


When this trope is in play, the efforts and contributions of the other "Western" Allies are downplayed, and the Eastern Front (where more than ''80%'' of the Wehrmacht was engaged at any one time after June 22 1941, and where the Germans suffered approximately ''77%'' of their casualties) is considered a ''sideshow'', if it's even mentioned at all. Often it seems like the only other Allied nation-state that actually did anything to fight Germany was the UK, which ([[CheeseEatingSurrenderMonkeys after the Poles and French got their asses handed to them]]) kept the hopeless fight alive until the USA joined in and saved the day. This is likely a result of the ColdWar making American educators and filmmakers unwilling to glorify [[DirtyCommunists the Soviet Union]].

to:

When this trope is in play, the efforts and contributions of the other "Western" Allies are downplayed, and the Eastern Front (where more than ''80%'' of the Wehrmacht was engaged at any one time after June 22 1941, and where the Germans suffered approximately ''77%'' of their casualties) is considered a ''sideshow'', if it's even mentioned at all. Often it seems like the only other Allied nation-state that actually did anything to fight Germany was the UK, which ([[CheeseEatingSurrenderMonkeys after the Poles and French got their asses handed to them]]) kept the hopeless fight alive until the USA joined in and saved the day. This is likely a result of the ColdWar making American educators and filmmakers unwilling to glorify [[DirtyCommunists the Soviet Union]].
Union]] or [[DirtyCommunists Maoist China]].

Top