Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / AdaptationInducedPlotHole

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Another point that compounds this issue.


** In the [[WesternAnimation/TheLionKing1994 original film]], it's made fairly clear why the hyenas are so willing to go along with Scar's plan: they're a bunch of bickering louts with no leader, he's able to bribe them with food, he's responsible for their initial attack on Simba and rewards them even after they fail, and based on the way they speak to him, it seems like they've known each other for a while. In the remake, it's made clear that Scar only met the hyenas after said attack, he doesn't offer them anything apart from his word, and the hyenas already have a clear leader in the form of an AdaptationalBadass-ified Shenzi. Yet the hyenas are still happy to fall in line for a very risky plan, based on the statements of the brother of the guy who just ripped through them like tissue paper. If anything, it makes one wonder why the hyenas didn't try to attack Scar the moment he showed up.

to:

** In the [[WesternAnimation/TheLionKing1994 original film]], it's made fairly clear why the hyenas are so willing to go along with Scar's plan: they're a bunch of bickering louts with no leader, he's able to bribe them with food, he's responsible for their initial attack on Simba and rewards them even after they fail, and based on the way they speak to him, it seems like they've known each other for a while. In the remake, it's made clear that Scar only met the hyenas after said attack, he doesn't offer them anything apart from his word, and the hyenas already have a clear leader in the form of an AdaptationalBadass-ified Shenzi. Yet the hyenas are still happy to fall in line for a very risky plan, based on the statements of the brother of the guy who just ripped through them like tissue paper. If anything, it makes one wonder why the hyenas didn't try to attack Scar the moment he showed up. And if they did want Simba dead so badly, why didn't they try to kill him themselves earlier in the rescue scene, when they had him surrounded, outnumbered about 12-1, and their leader present? (In the original, there's only three hyenas at the scene, one of which is Shenzi but she, again, isn't any kind of leader, and Simbra literally got the jump on them before quickly scaring them off instead of talking to Shenzi for a few minutes.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''[[VideoGame/{{Warcraft}} Warcraft 3]] [[UpdatedRerelease Reforged]]'' created one in the Scourge campaign. In the original game, Arthas had to use a waygate system or goblin zepplins in order to get around Sylvanas destroying the bridges so he could reach the Sunwell and bring back Kel'Thuzad, the Sunwell being located in Silvermoon city. ''VideoGame/WorldOfWarcraft'' would later move the Sunwell to it's own island located past Silvermoon city, which the Arthas focused novel, ''[[Literature/{{Arthas}} Arthas: Rise of the Lich King]]'', provided a reason he got to it by using Frostmourne to make a ice path to cross it. Reforged adjusted the level to include said explanation, but still kept prior elements of invasion the same, such as waygates and zeppelins, creating a plothole exclusive to Reforge about why Arthas never used ice to cross the destroyed gaps sooner.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Theatre/LoveNeverDies'', while not a straight adaptation of ''Literature/ThePhantomOfManhattan'', is based heavily on it (to the point Forsyth is actually credited for the show) and takes several plot points wholesale, most notably [[spoiler: Christine's son being Erik's, not Raoul's.]] However, the changes to Raoul's personality--namely, making him a drunken {{Jerkass}}--are such that the ''explanation'' for [[spoiler: how the characters know who Gustave's biological father is]] had to be changed, as with this significantly more selfish version of Raoul it wouldn't make sense. However, that then means it also no longer makes sense how everyone comes to be so sure of that particular fact. [[spoiler: Short version: Book!Raoul is impotent/infertile--so of course they're sure it's Erik, it can't be anyone else--but he's a really nice guy and decided to GiveTheBabyAFather. Show!Raoul wouldn't do that, so the impotence is removed and he had sex with Christine in the correct timeframe to believe the boy to be his. Which means the show has to pivot to the ''significantly'' shakier evidence of Gustave's musical talent to prove that Erik is the father.]] There are many reasons this doesn't actually prove anything (even not accounting for the WritersCannotDoMath-induced timeline issues), yet the show treats it as rock-solid evidence on par with modern science.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* [[WesternAnimation/BatmanTheLongHalloween The adaptation]] of the famous Batman Graphic Novel ''ComicBook/TheLongHalloween'' creates one surrounding the Holiday Killer's identity. In the original graphic novel, it was left ambiguous at the end who of the three primary suspects; Alberto Falcone [[note]] who is caught in the act while attempting one of the killings and confesses to all of then, [[/note]] Harvey Dent [[note]] who had motive to kill mobsters as the DA and is proven to be mentally unstable and murderous in the story when he become Two-Face [[/note]] or Gilda Dent [[note]] who confesses to the killings in her inner monologue and burns some apparent evidence while alone at the end [[/note]], did which, if any, of the Holiday killings. The Holiday Killer themself is kept off-panel in every scene before Alberto gets caught to assist in this mystery. In the film, however, [[spoiler: Alberto Falcone is ruled out as a suspect when he's shot and thrown into a boat's propeller, leaving him DeadderThanDead halfway through the story,]] and at multiple points, both the audience and Batman see the Holiday Killer plainly; they wear thick clothes and a mask, but have the unmistakeable body-type of a well-built man.[[spoiler: While Harvey does get charged for the killings (after becoming Two-Face) at the end, Batman confronts Gilda in the scene where she burns the evidence in this version, but doesn't call out her claims of having been the only killer as nonsense.]] It's also at least treated as a possibility that [[LetOffByTheDetective Batman will let them go now that the Holiday killings are over,]] because he finds their motives sympathetic, which would be seriously only OutOfCharacter for Batman even if [[spoiler: Gilda/Harvey's killings hadn't lead to a gang war in Gotham and hadn't killed Alberto Falcone, who is (mostly) innocent in this continuity.]]

to:

* [[WesternAnimation/BatmanTheLongHalloween The adaptation]] of the famous Batman Graphic Novel ''ComicBook/TheLongHalloween'' creates one surrounding the Holiday Killer's identity. In the original graphic novel, it was left ambiguous at the end who of the three primary suspects; Alberto Falcone [[note]] who is caught in the act while attempting one of the killings and confesses to all of then, [[/note]] Harvey Dent [[note]] who had motive to kill mobsters as the DA and is proven to be mentally unstable and murderous in the story when he become Two-Face [[/note]] or Gilda Dent [[note]] who confesses to the killings in her inner monologue and burns some apparent evidence while alone at the end [[/note]], did which, if any, of the Holiday killings. The Holiday Killer themself is kept off-panel in every scene before Alberto gets caught to assist in this mystery. In the film, however, [[spoiler: Alberto Falcone is ruled out as a suspect when he's shot and thrown into a boat's propeller, leaving him DeadderThanDead halfway through the story,]] and at multiple points, both the audience and Batman see the Holiday Killer plainly; they wear thick clothes and a mask, but have the unmistakeable body-type of a well-built man.[[spoiler: While Harvey does get charged for the killings (after becoming Two-Face) at the end, Batman confronts Gilda in the scene where she burns the evidence in this version, but doesn't call out her claims of having been the only killer as nonsense.]] It's also at least treated as a possibility that [[LetOffByTheDetective Batman will let them go now that the Holiday killings are over,]] because he finds their motives sympathetic, which would be seriously only OutOfCharacter for Batman even if [[spoiler: Gilda/Harvey's killings hadn't lead to a gang war in Gotham and hadn't killed Alberto Falcone, who is (mostly) innocent in this continuity.]]

Added: 365

Removed: 365

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Fanfic/ABrighterDark'' [[AdaptedOut removes]] [[GreaterScopeVillain Anankos and the kingdom of Valla]] from the narrative. The problem is, a lot of character motivations and backstories (most notably Garon's) only make sense with Anankos's involvement, meaning quite a bit of the fic (which [[StationsOfTheCanon follows canon very closely]]) doesn't make sense.



* ''Fanfic/ABrighterDark'' [[AdaptedOut removes]] [[GreaterScopeVillain Anankos and the kingdom of Valla]] from the narrative. The problem is, a lot of character motivations and backstories (most notably Garon's) only make sense with Anankos's involvement, meaning quite a bit of the fic (which [[StationsOfTheCanon follows canon very closely]]) doesn't make sense.

Added: 317

Removed: 316

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Fanfic/AllMyHomiesHateAthalieSeverin'': ''Why'' does God suddenly decide to kill Athalie Severin right at that moment, when he could have killed her before she [[spoiler: killed her sister]] or abused her kids? ''Webcomic/{{Muted}}'' averted this by not having God appear at all, and not being, well, a CrackFic.



* ''Fanfic/AllMyHomiesHateAthalieSeverin'': ''Why'' does God suddenly decide to kill Athalie Severin right at that moment, when he could have killed her before she [[spoiler: killed her sister]] or abused her kids? ''Webcomic/{{Muted}}'' averted this by not having God appear at all, and not being, well, a CrackFic.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* [[WesternAnimation/BatmanTheLongHalloween The adaptation]] of the famous Batman Graphic Novel ''ComicBook/TheLongHalloween'' creates one surrounding the Holiday Killer's identity. In the original graphic novel, it was left ambiguous at the end who of the three primary suspects; Alberto Falcone [[note]] who is caught in the act while attempting one of the killings and confesses to all of then, [[/note]] Harvey Dent [[note]] who had motive to kill mobsters as the DA and is proven to be mentally unstable and murderous in the story when he become Two-Face [[/note]] or Gilda Dent [[note]] who confesses to the killings in her inner monologue and burns some apparent evidence while alone at the end [[/note]], did which, if any, of the Holiday killings. The Holiday Killer themself is kept off-panel in every scene before Alberto gets caught to assist in this mystery. In the film, however, [[spoiler: Alberto Falcone is ruled out as a suspect when he's shot and thrown into a boat's propeller, leaving him DeadderThanDead halfway through the story,]] and at multiple points, both the audience and Batman see the Holiday Killer plainly; they wear thick clothes and a mask, but have the unmistakeable body-type of a well-built man.[[spoiler: While Harvey does get charged for the killings (after becoming Two-Face) at the end, Batman confronts Gilda in the scene where she burns the evidence in this version, but doesn't call out her claims of having been the only killer as nonsense.]] It's also at least treated as a possibility that [[LetOffByTheDetective Batman will let them go now that the Holiday killings are over,]] because he finds their motives sympathetic, which would be seriously only OutOfCharacter for Batman even if [[spoiler: Gilda/Harvey's killings hadn't lead to a gang war in Gotham and hadn't killed Alberto Falcone, who is (mostly) innocent in this continuity.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Updating Links


* The first ''Comicbook/ArmyOfDarkness'' comic was an adaptation of [[Film/ArmyOfDarkness the movie]] which featured the alternate ending where Ash wakes up in a post-apocalyptic future rather than going back to his own time. The next series of comics start where the movie ended, with Ash fighting deadites at work.

to:

* The first ''Comicbook/ArmyOfDarkness'' ''ComicBook/ArmyOfDarkness'' comic was an adaptation of [[Film/ArmyOfDarkness the movie]] which featured the alternate ending where Ash wakes up in a post-apocalyptic future rather than going back to his own time. The next series of comics start where the movie ended, with Ash fighting deadites at work.



* In ''WesternAnimation/SpiderManAcrossTheSpiderVerse'', ComicBook/MilesMorales notably has a different last name than his father, Officer Jefferson Davis. When Miles was originally introduced in ''[[ComicBook/UltimateSpiderMan Ultimate Comics: Spider-Man]]'', this was because "Jefferson Davis" was only his father's ''birthname''; he took his wife Rio Morales' last name after he got married, wanting to distance himself from his criminal brother Aaron Davis. But since this isn't the case in the film, it raises the question of why "Davis" isn't Miles' last name too.

to:

* In ''WesternAnimation/SpiderManAcrossTheSpiderVerse'', ComicBook/MilesMorales ''WesternAnimation/SpiderManAcrossTheSpiderVerse'': [[Characters/MarvelComicsMilesMorales Miles Morales]] notably has a different last name than his father, Officer Jefferson Davis. When Miles was originally introduced in ''[[ComicBook/UltimateSpiderMan Ultimate Comics: Spider-Man]]'', this was because "Jefferson Davis" was only his father's ''birthname''; he took his wife Rio Morales' last name after he got married, wanting to distance himself from his criminal brother Aaron Davis. But since this isn't the case in the film, it raises the question of why "Davis" isn't Miles' last name too.



** In the original ''[[Comicbook/TheInfinityGauntlet Infinity Gauntlet]]'' storyline, one of the things that led to ComicBook/{{Thanos}}' downfall was his decision to purposefully hold back against the heroes so that he could impress Death. The cartoon adapts this plot point but removes Death from the equation, meaning Thanos basically holds back against the heroes either because of [[NoChallengeEqualsNoSatisfaction his own arrogance]] or a random case of BondVillainStupidity.
** Season 3 adapts the original ''ComicBook/{{Thunderbolts}}'' story arc from the comics, which involves the Masters of Evil, a team of super-villains, posing as a new super-hero team in order to get people to trust them. In the comic, it actually made sense that nobody recognized them despite the fact they were still using the same powers, since the Masters of Evil had been through several lineups over the course of their career, and the members they used for the impersonation all had super-powers and abilities that were, for the most part, pretty common in the Marvel Universe [[note]]Baron Zemo[=/=]Citizen V was a BadassNormal like ComicBook/ThePunisher, ComicBook/{{Hawkeye}} or ComicBook/BlackWidow; Beetle[=/=]MACH-1 had a PoweredArmor like Iron Man, Comicbook/WarMachine or nearly everyone in Iron Man's RoguesGallery; Goliath[=/=]Atlas had SizeShifting like any hero using [[ComicBook/AntMan Pym particles]]; Moonstone[=/=]Meteorite was a FlyingFirepower like ComicBook/MsMarvel and plenty of other characters, and so on--and one of the few characters who didn't have a common power, Songbird, didn't have the same abilities that she'd had back when she was Screaming Mimi.[[/note]]. Plus, they showed up [[DarkestHour at a time where most heroes in the Marvel Universe had gone missing]], making it easier for them to get accepted with no question, since people were all too happy to have a new superhero team serving as their protectors. In the cartoon, the Avengers have only met the Masters of Evil a few episodes before they show up disguised as the Thunderbolts, the only line-up they have displayed is the one they use while in disguise, very few of the characters with similar super-powers have been introduced, and every Marvel hero is still alive and well, so you are left wondering how the Avengers don't put two and two together when this mysterious new superhero team with the same powers as a super-villain group they recently fought shows up.

to:

** In the original ''[[Comicbook/TheInfinityGauntlet ''[[ComicBook/TheInfinityGauntlet Infinity Gauntlet]]'' storyline, one of the things that led to ComicBook/{{Thanos}}' downfall was his decision to purposefully hold back against the heroes so that he could impress Death. The cartoon adapts this plot point but removes Death from the equation, meaning Thanos basically holds back against the heroes either because of [[NoChallengeEqualsNoSatisfaction his own arrogance]] or a random case of BondVillainStupidity.
** Season 3 adapts the original ''ComicBook/{{Thunderbolts}}'' story arc from the comics, which involves the Masters of Evil, a team of super-villains, posing as a new super-hero team in order to get people to trust them. In the comic, it actually made sense that nobody recognized them despite the fact they were still using the same powers, since the Masters of Evil had been through several lineups over the course of their career, and the members they used for the impersonation all had super-powers and abilities that were, for the most part, pretty common in the Marvel Universe [[note]]Baron Zemo[=/=]Citizen V was a BadassNormal like ComicBook/ThePunisher, ComicBook/{{Hawkeye}} or ComicBook/BlackWidow; Beetle[=/=]MACH-1 had a PoweredArmor like Iron Man, Comicbook/WarMachine ComicBook/IronMan, ComicBook/WarMachine or nearly everyone in Iron Man's RoguesGallery; Goliath[=/=]Atlas had SizeShifting like any hero using [[ComicBook/AntMan Pym particles]]; Moonstone[=/=]Meteorite was a FlyingFirepower like ComicBook/MsMarvel and plenty of other characters, and so on--and one of the few characters who didn't have a common power, Songbird, didn't have the same abilities that she'd had back when she was Screaming Mimi.[[/note]]. Plus, they showed up [[DarkestHour at a time where most heroes in the Marvel Universe had gone missing]], making it easier for them to get accepted with no question, since people were all too happy to have a new superhero team serving as their protectors. In the cartoon, the Avengers have only met the Masters of Evil a few episodes before they show up disguised as the Thunderbolts, the only line-up they have displayed is the one they use while in disguise, very few of the characters with similar super-powers have been introduced, and every Marvel hero is still alive and well, so you are left wondering how the Avengers don't put two and two together when this mysterious new superhero team with the same powers as a super-villain group they recently fought shows up.



* ''WesternAnimation/BatmanTheBraveAndTheBold'' followed the comic book {{Retcon}} that established that the scarab that empowered UsefulNotes/{{the Golden Age|OfComicBooks}} Comicbook/BlueBeetle was actually an alien robot. No effort was made to explain why the original Blue Beetle's costume still looked like [[SpandexLatexOrLeather spandex tights]] when Jaime, the current Beetle, had a suit of PoweredArmor. (In the comics, it was because the scarab was infused with magic power while on Earth, which distorted its actual powers, and it only "awoke" after the second Beetle - who never actually used it - started experimenting on it.)

to:

* ''WesternAnimation/BatmanTheBraveAndTheBold'' followed the comic book {{Retcon}} that established that the scarab that empowered UsefulNotes/{{the Golden Age|OfComicBooks}} Comicbook/BlueBeetle ComicBook/BlueBeetle was actually an alien robot. No effort was made to explain why the original Blue Beetle's costume still looked like [[SpandexLatexOrLeather spandex tights]] when Jaime, the current Beetle, had a suit of PoweredArmor. (In the comics, it was because the scarab was infused with magic power while on Earth, which distorted its actual powers, and it only "awoke" after the second Beetle - who never actually used it - started experimenting on it.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Tahu's brave proclamation in ''Mask of Light'' that "None have breached the gates of Ta-Koro before!" is undermined by the fact that it ''has'' been breached during the Bohrok-Kal arc (with the destroyed gate's rubble even burying Tahu), not long before the movie's events. In the writers' defense, it was something of a {{filler}} story written sometime during the film's production, and it's possible they didn't know about it or didn't feel like changing the line.

to:

** Tahu's brave proclamation in ''Mask of Light'' that "None have breached the Ta-Koro's gates of Ta-Koro before!" is undermined by the fact that it ''has'' been breached during the Bohrok-Kal arc (with the destroyed gate's rubble even burying Tahu), not long before the movie's events. In the writers' defense, it was something of a {{filler}} story written sometime during the film's production, and it's possible they didn't know about it or didn't feel like changing the line.

Added: 792

Changed: 42

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The portable version of ''VideoGame/PacManWorld2'' copy-pastes several lines of dialogue from the Console version, without any regards to context. This leads to things like the FinalBoss gloating how Pac-Man can't survive his fireball and InterfaceScrew attacks, followed by the fight not changing at all.

to:

* The portable version of ''VideoGame/PacManWorld2'' copy-pastes several lines of dialogue from the Console version, without any regards to context. This leads to things like the FinalBoss gloating how Pac-Man can't survive his fireball and InterfaceScrew attacks, followed by the fight only to then not changing at all.use them.



** Like with the [[VideoGame/ResidentEvil original game,]] the two scenarios are now mutually exclusive in the events they depict, even accounting for GameplayAndStorySegregation, but both need to be canon for the rest of the series to make sense. The protagonists encounter different people in the same places (or the same people, but alone), characters die "twice", etc.

to:

** Like with the [[VideoGame/ResidentEvil [[VideoGame/ResidentEvil1 original game,]] the two scenarios are now mutually exclusive in the events they depict, even accounting for GameplayAndStorySegregation, but both need to be canon for the rest of the series to make sense. The protagonists encounter different people in the same places (or the same people, but alone), characters die "twice", etc.



** In the original game, it was implied (and confirmed by other material) that Brad Vickers was [[ImplaceableMan Nemesis']] initial target, and the monster had been stalking the S.T.A.R.S. officer for some time. In the remake, though, [[PlayerCharacter Jill]] is Nemesis' first target, and we see that his pod was deployed right outside her apartment. Yet Brad still explains to Jill what Nemesis is and that he's hunting S.T.A.R.S. even though, by rights, he couldn't have even seen Nemesis for more than a minute before the game began, if at all.

to:

** In the original game, it was implied (and confirmed by other material) that Brad Vickers was [[ImplaceableMan [[ImplacableMan Nemesis']] initial target, and the monster had been stalking the S.T.A.R.S. officer for some time. In the remake, though, [[PlayerCharacter Jill]] is Nemesis' first target, and we see that his pod was deployed right outside her apartment. Yet Brad still explains to Jill what Nemesis is and that he's hunting S.T.A.R.S. even though, by rights, he couldn't have even seen Nemesis for more than a minute before the game began, if at all.


Added DiffLines:

* The UsefulNotes/PlayStation2 version of the first ''VideoGame/SplinterCell1'' includes an extra mission set in a nuclear power plant as an added bonus to make up for all the other content that had to be cut from the Xbox and PC versions. Despite this mission not being available on any other platform other than the original [=PS2=] release, however, it's still treated as plot-critical to ''all'' versions, as the mission explains how a rogue Chinese general got his hands on nuclear material he plans to make a bomb with - on any platform other than that, all this comes out to is a brief moment in the second Chinese Embassy mission where Lambert [[OhCrap suddenly starts freaking out]] about having found some "missing Americium-239" the player was never warned about before that point.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''VideoGame/RamboTheVideoGame'' is a CompressedAdaptation based off the first three ''Franchise/{{Rambo}}'' films, and the segments based on ''Film/FirstBlood'', ends with Rambo getting arrested just like in the film. Unlike the film, where Rambo kills only a single policemen by accident, the game allows him to maim, shoot, and massacre aplenty without any guilt, which makes Rambo's imprisonment feels more like a slap on the wrist.

to:

* ''VideoGame/RamboTheVideoGame'' is a CompressedAdaptation based off the first three ''Franchise/{{Rambo}}'' films, and the segments based on ''Film/FirstBlood'', ends with Rambo getting arrested just like in the film. Unlike the film, where Rambo kills only a single policemen by accident, the game allows him to maim, shoot, and massacre aplenty without any guilt, which makes Rambo's imprisonment feels feel more like a slap on the wrist.

Changed: 843

Removed: 843

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''TabletopGame/{{Pathfinder}}'': Second Edition has a really odd and [[ExaggeratedTrope extreme]] example. Paizo, the creators of ''Pathfinder'', decided to remove slavery from the primary setting of their games due to no longer feeling comfortable with the DarkerAndEdgier tone they made when they first released ''Pathfinder''. However, instead of saying it was abolished or creating a narrative reason, they instead retroactively removed slavery from the game,
not just in the sense of not allow pcs to own slaves (which would be completely reasonable), but making it so even ''villains'' don't have slaves. This creates tons of plotholes, as there were a lot of evil races, organizations, and countries that use slavery, and there's even a species of demon created from slavers, yet now suddenly they never once used slaves despite having them being a core part of why they were presented as evil, the biggest one being TheEmpire Cheliax, which had an Adventure Path dedicated to the players being freedom fighters in a city ruled by them and being able to free slaves during it. There are also multiple organizations dedicated to abolishing slavery, so what they are supposed to do now is a mystery, or if they even exist now, given the reason they were created no longer is apparently a thing anymore.

to:

* ''TabletopGame/{{Pathfinder}}'': Second Edition has a really odd and [[ExaggeratedTrope extreme]] example. Paizo, the creators of ''Pathfinder'', decided to remove slavery from the primary setting of their games due to no longer feeling comfortable with the DarkerAndEdgier tone they made when they first released ''Pathfinder''. However, instead of saying it was abolished or creating a narrative reason, they instead retroactively removed slavery from the game,
game, not just in the sense of not allow pcs to own slaves (which would be completely reasonable), but making it so even ''villains'' don't have slaves. This creates tons of plotholes, as there were a lot of evil races, organizations, and countries that use slavery, and there's even a species of demon created from slavers, yet now suddenly they never once used slaves despite having them being a core part of why they were presented as evil, the biggest one being TheEmpire Cheliax, which had an Adventure Path dedicated to the players being freedom fighters in a city ruled by them and being able to free slaves during it. There are also multiple organizations dedicated to abolishing slavery, so what they are supposed to do now is a mystery, or if they even exist now, given the reason they were created no longer is apparently a thing anymore.

Added: 843

Changed: 621

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''TabletopGame/{{Pathfinder}}'': Second Edition has a really odd and [[ExaggeratedTrope extreme]] example. They decided to just retroactively remove slavery from the game, not just in the sense of not allow pcs to own slaves (which would be completely reasonable), but making it so even ''villains'' don't have slaves. This creates tons of plotholes, as there were a lot of evil races, organizations, and countries that use slavery, and there's even a species of demon created from slavers. There are also multiple organizations dedicated to abolishing slavery, so what they are supposed to do now is a mystery.

to:

* ''TabletopGame/{{Pathfinder}}'': Second Edition has a really odd and [[ExaggeratedTrope extreme]] example. They Paizo, the creators of ''Pathfinder'', decided to just retroactively remove slavery from the game, primary setting of their games due to no longer feeling comfortable with the DarkerAndEdgier tone they made when they first released ''Pathfinder''. However, instead of saying it was abolished or creating a narrative reason, they instead retroactively removed slavery from the game,
not just in the sense of not allow pcs to own slaves (which would be completely reasonable), but making it so even ''villains'' don't have slaves. This creates tons of plotholes, as there were a lot of evil races, organizations, and countries that use slavery, and there's even a species of demon created from slavers. slavers, yet now suddenly they never once used slaves despite having them being a core part of why they were presented as evil, the biggest one being TheEmpire Cheliax, which had an Adventure Path dedicated to the players being freedom fighters in a city ruled by them and being able to free slaves during it. There are also multiple organizations dedicated to abolishing slavery, so what they are supposed to do now is a mystery.mystery, or if they even exist now, given the reason they were created no longer is apparently a thing anymore.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Fanfic/AllMyHomiesHateAthalieSeverin'': ''Why'' does God suddenly decide to kill Athalie Severin right at that moment, when he could have killed her before she [[spoiler: killed her sister]] or abused her kids? ''Webcomic/{{Muted}}'' averted this by not having God appear at all, and not being, well, a CrackFic.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In the radio adaptation of ''Literature/WyrdSisters'' [[spoiler: the older witches tell Magrat that the Fool/Verence II ''is'', in fact, the son of Verence I and Mrs Fool, as everyone believes, ''and'' that Tomjon is the son of the elder Fool and the Queen, as in the book, making them both "half royal". Setting aside that the whole ''point'' of the scene in the book is "the king is someone who does not have royal blood at all, and this is all to the good", this makes a nonsense out of the claim that telling everyone they're brothers and Verence is the older is "truthful but not honest", since they're not brothers at all, and it's not clear ''why'' Magrat is somewhat aghast at the supposed ExactWords, since they've actually put the person with the strongest claim on the throne after all.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None








* In the ''WesternAnimation/ThomasAndFriends'' episode "Trucks!", some trucks (not road vehicles, but what Americans would call freight cars) deliberately cause an accident because they think Peter Sam is Sir Handel, despite Peter Sam being painted green and Sir Handel being painted blue. This made more sense in the original Railway Series book, where all the narrow gauge engines were painted the same red color.

to:

* In the ''WesternAnimation/ThomasAndFriends'' episode "Trucks!", some trucks (not road vehicles, but [[SeparatedByACommonLanguage what Americans would call freight cars) cars]]) deliberately cause an accident because they think Peter Sam is Sir Handel, despite Peter Sam being painted green and Sir Handel being painted blue. This made more sense in the original Railway Series book, where all the narrow gauge engines [[AdaptationDyeJob were painted the same red color.color]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Just about every critical review of the film has snarked at the fact that the song "Can You Feel the Love ''Tonight''" is now sung during the ''daytime''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Franchise/MonsterVerse novelizations:
** In the ''[[Film/GodzillaKingOfTheMonsters2019 Godzilla: King of the Monsters]]'' novelization, the three-headed dragon [[GiantFlyer Ghidorah]]'s remaining severed head at the end is covered in barnacles, unlike in the film. In both the film and book versions of the story, the ocean which the head was dredged up from (using no less than nine fishing boats due to the head's size and weight) is supposed to be barren and poisoned to the point of lifelessness, having been lethally blasted by the Oxygen Destroyer just seconds after the head was torn off by Godzilla while he was dragging Ghidorah into the water. So where the hell did the barnacles come from, and how were they alive and present long enough to attach themselves to the head en masse?
** The novelization of ''Film/GodzillaVsKong'' explicitly says that [[CorporateConspiracy Apex]] have severed skulls from ''two'' Ghidorah heads in their possession, whereas only one skull was ever explicitly seen in the movie. This comes across as a glaring continuity error, since in the previous story (book and film versions both), Ghidorah's entire body including all three of his attached heads were completely disintegrated, leaving behind only the single, earlier-decapitated head that's mentioned above, and there were no other points during the movie inbetween Ghidorah's [[SealedEvilInACan unsealing]] and his death at which he could have lost and regrown another head.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Theatre/EvilDeadTheMusical'': Lampshaded. In the movie, Jake tries to force the group out into the woods to look for Bobbi Joe, his girlfriend. In the show, Bobbi Joe is adapted out, but Jake still wants to force everyone out into the woods. When Ash demands to know why Jake would want to go into the woods, Jake {{handwave}}s it by saying, "I don't have time for your common sense!"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Crossing with AdaptationExplanationExtrication, there's no reason why John needs to remain barefoot the entire movie, after killing dozens and dozens of terrorists he could salvage shoes from, unlike the film where the one opportunity he has to steal shoes is from Tony, a mook whose "feet is smaller than his sister's". John just needs to be barefoot because the game says so (either that, or ''all 50-plus'' terrorists John killed throughout the game have feet smaller than his sister's).

to:

** Crossing with AdaptationExplanationExtrication, there's no reason why John needs to remain barefoot the entire movie, game after killing dozens and dozens of terrorists he could salvage shoes from, unlike the film where the one opportunity he has to steal shoes is from Tony, a mook whose "feet is smaller than his sister's". John just needs to be barefoot because the game says so (either that, or ''all 50-plus'' terrorists John killed throughout the game have feet smaller than his sister's).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The obscure NES game ''Menace Beach'' revolves around rescuing your girlfriend from a villain. The enemies who attack you are his henchmen sent to impede your progress. The game was later rereleased under the title ''Sunday Funday'' as a Christian edutainment game. Problem? To make the game more Christian, the plot was changed to be about you trying to get to Sunday school. With this change however, there is now no explicable reason for all these weirdos to be trying to violently murder your character, or for your character to take so many detours through the sewers and caves to reach the church. WebVideo/TheAngryVideoGameNerd said it best in his review:

to:

* The obscure NES game ''Menace Beach'' ''VideoGame/MenaceBeach'' revolves around rescuing your girlfriend from a villain. The enemies who attack you are his henchmen sent to impede your progress. The game was later rereleased under the title ''Sunday Funday'' as a Christian edutainment game. Problem? To make the game more Christian, the plot was changed to be about you trying to get to Sunday school. With this change however, there is now no explicable reason for all these weirdos to be trying to violently murder your character, or for your character to take so many detours through the sewers and caves to reach the church. WebVideo/TheAngryVideoGameNerd said it best in his review:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** For instance, the game's recreation of Hans' masterplan from the film - hijacking all the bearer bonds from Nakatomi Plaza's vault, stage a faked suicide bombing and escape in their getaway vehicle makes a lot less sense when translated to video game, given how Hans brought along nearly a hundred extra mooks - compared to the film where his team consists of twelve guys. How does a small army of terrorists fake a suicide bombing without raising any suspicions? And should Hans' theft of the bonds goes off without a hitch, how is his legion of goons going to evacuate discreetly given their numbers?

to:

** For instance, the game's recreation of Hans' masterplan from the film - hijacking all the bearer bonds from Nakatomi Plaza's vault, stage a faked suicide bombing and escape in their getaway vehicle - makes a lot less sense when translated to video game, given how Hans brought along nearly a hundred extra mooks - compared (compared to the film where his team consists of twelve guys.guys). How does a small army of terrorists fake a suicide bombing without raising any suspicions? And should Hans' theft of the bonds goes off without a hitch, how is his legion of goons going to evacuate discreetly given their numbers?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''VideoGame/DieHardNakatomiPlaza'' is a rather direct adaptation of the classic action film, ''Film/DieHard'', but with a few plot points added and John [=McClane=] fighting off ''hundreds'' of terrorists for the sake of more action, leading to some plot inconsistencies.
** For instance, the game's recreation of Hans' masterplan from the film - hijacking all the bearer bonds from Nakatomi Plaza's vault, stage a faked suicide bombing and escape in their getaway vehicle makes a lot less sense when translated to video game, given how Hans brought along nearly a hundred extra mooks - compared to the film where his team consists of twelve guys. How does a small army of terrorists fake a suicide bombing without raising any suspicions? And should Hans' theft of the bonds goes off without a hitch, how is his legion of goons going to evacuate discreetly given their numbers?
** There's also the rooftop scene where John tries to evacuate hostages only to be mistaken for a terrorist and shot at. In the game, John meets a bunch of SWAT officers in a stage and helps them escort some hostages, ''before'' the helipad scene. Despite having met up with the relevant authorities who likely informed their superiors that John isn't one of the terrorists, the rooftop moment still happens.
** Crossing with AdaptationExplanationExtrication, there's no reason why John needs to remain barefoot the entire movie, after killing dozens and dozens of terrorists he could salvage shoes from, unlike the film where the one opportunity he has to steal shoes is from Tony, a mook whose "feet is smaller than his sister's". John just needs to be barefoot because the game says so (either that, or ''all 50-plus'' terrorists John killed throughout the game have feet smaller than his sister's).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** AdaptationInducedPlotHole/LockeAndKey2020

to:

** AdaptationInducedPlotHole/LockeAndKey2020''AdaptationInducedPlotHole/LockeAndKey2020''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Apologies, lost half the edit reason: removed after double-checking on the complaining thread that it's okay to do so.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
This was removed by the complaining thread for two reasons (the original entry was complaining and using a fairy tale may not be able to be eligible for this trope). This entry was added back without addressing the plot hole issue, making it an edit war.


* [[TheHeavy Cinder Fall's]] backstory in ''WebAnimation/{{RWBY}}'' is a WholePlotReference to the Cinderella fairytale but transplanting the classic story into the pre-established world of Remnant and other alternations create some serious [[FridgeLogic logical holes.]] In most versions of the story, Cinderella is made responsible for all the housework in her family manor that, while large, has only a few people in it, while here, Cinder appears to be [[OddlySmallOrganization the only staff in a hotel]] that looks like it could hold dozens if not hundreds of guests. Slavery is also explicitly illegal in Remnant [[note]] Cinder is forced to do menial labor in a business and [[ElectricTorture physically tortured as punishment]] so Madam being her legal guardian makes the difference between her condition and traditional slavery a rather obvious DistinctionWithoutADifference and a massive loophole it seems unlikely those who outlawed slavery could overlook [[/note]] but the Prince Charming analogue in Cinder's backstory, a sympathetic huntsman named Rhodes, never brings up the possibility [[JustEatGilligan of calling the police or social services,]] instead deciding to help her by training her to be a huntress for the next several years. WordOfGod was that Rhodes was unaware of the true horrors of Cinder's living conditions, just as the Prince is generally unaware of Cinderella's, but this [[VoodooShark raises further questions,]] because in this story the duo interacts for years instead of a single night, Cinderella's treatment is not illegal in most tellings due to both not being as harsh, and [[DeliberateValuesDissonance taking place before laws against child abuse were commonplace,]] and the Prince did not approach Cinderella with the explicit intention of helping her as Rhodes does Cinder, giving Cinderella far less incentive to explain things.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''VideoGame/RamboTheVideoGame'' is a CompressedAdaptation based off the first three ''Franchise/{{Rambo}}'' films, and the segments based on ''Film/FirstBlood'', ends with Rambo getting arrested just like in the film. Unlike the film, where Rambo kills only a single policemen by accident, the game allows him to maim, shoot, and massacre aplenty without any guilt, which makes Rambo's imprisonment feels more like a slap on the wrist.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In order to make Lister smuggling Frankenstein on board less wildly irresponsible, the book says she was an expensive pet-shop cat that was inocculated against everything. This makes it significantly less likely that she just happened to be pregnant, which is required for the Cat race to exist.

to:

** In order to make Lister smuggling Frankenstein on board less wildly irresponsible, the book says she was an expensive pet-shop cat that was inocculated against everything. This makes it significantly less likely that she just happened to be pregnant, not only wasn't spayed, but was pregnant when Lister bought her, which is required for the Cat race to exist.

Added: 878

Changed: 536

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In the ''Literature/RedDwarf'' novelisations, the disaster that wiped out the ''Red Dwarf'' crew was caused not by Rimmer's incompetence, (which happened in the TV series) but by a series of malfunctions that the crew were unable to notice. For some reason, the disaster did not happen in Ace Rimmer's universe, despite it having no connection to his presence (or lack thereof) on the ship, with the one real difference being that Ace was held back in school, while Prime Rimmer wasn't (which led to Lister having a bunkmate on the ship who encouraged him to apply himself).

to:

* In the The ''Literature/RedDwarf'' novelisations, the novelisations:
** The
disaster that wiped out the ''Red Dwarf'' crew was caused not by Rimmer's incompetence, (which happened in the TV series) series ([[SeriesContinuityError except when it didn't]]) but by a series of malfunctions that the crew were unable to notice. For some reason, the disaster did not happen in Ace Rimmer's universe, despite it having no connection to his presence (or lack thereof) on the ship, with the one real difference being that Ace was held back in school, while Prime Rimmer wasn't (which led to Lister having a bunkmate on the ship who encouraged him to apply himself).himself).
** In order to make Lister smuggling Frankenstein on board less wildly irresponsible, the book says she was an expensive pet-shop cat that was inocculated against everything. This makes it significantly less likely that she just happened to be pregnant, which is required for the Cat race to exist.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
updated to reflect the Word Of God surrounding the issue.


* [[TheHeavy Cinder Fall's]] backstory in ''WebAnimation/{{RWBY}}'' is a WholePlotReference to the Cinderella fairytale but transplanting the classic story into the pre-established world of Remnant and other alternations create two serious [[FridgeLogic logical holes.]] In most versions of the story, Cinderella is made responsible for all the housework in her family manor that, while large, has only a few people in it, while here, Cinder appears to be [[OddlySmallOrganization the only staff in a hotel]] that looks like it could hold dozens if not hundreds of guests. Slavery is also explicitly illegal in Remnant [[note]] Cinder is forced to do menial labor in a business and [[ElectricTorture physically tortured as punishment]] so Madam being her legal guardian makes the difference between her condition and traditional slavery a rather obvious DistinctionWithoutADifference and a massive loophole it seems unlikely those who outlawed slavery could overlook [[/note]] but the Prince Charming analogue in Cinder's backstory, a sympathetic huntsman named Rhodes, never brings up the possibility of [[JustEatGilligan of calling the police or social services,]] instead deciding to help her by training her to be a huntress for the next several years. In almost every other telling, the Prince initially has no idea the hell Cinderella is living in, and the "ascension" he offers, marriage into royalty, is something that can be done almost instantly.

to:

* [[TheHeavy Cinder Fall's]] backstory in ''WebAnimation/{{RWBY}}'' is a WholePlotReference to the Cinderella fairytale but transplanting the classic story into the pre-established world of Remnant and other alternations create two some serious [[FridgeLogic logical holes.]] In most versions of the story, Cinderella is made responsible for all the housework in her family manor that, while large, has only a few people in it, while here, Cinder appears to be [[OddlySmallOrganization the only staff in a hotel]] that looks like it could hold dozens if not hundreds of guests. Slavery is also explicitly illegal in Remnant [[note]] Cinder is forced to do menial labor in a business and [[ElectricTorture physically tortured as punishment]] so Madam being her legal guardian makes the difference between her condition and traditional slavery a rather obvious DistinctionWithoutADifference and a massive loophole it seems unlikely those who outlawed slavery could overlook [[/note]] but the Prince Charming analogue in Cinder's backstory, a sympathetic huntsman named Rhodes, never brings up the possibility of [[JustEatGilligan of calling the police or social services,]] instead deciding to help her by training her to be a huntress for the next several years. In almost every other telling, WordOfGod was that Rhodes was unaware of the true horrors of Cinder's living conditions, just as the Prince initially has no idea is generally unaware of Cinderella's, but this [[VoodooShark raises further questions,]] because in this story the hell duo interacts for years instead of a single night, Cinderella's treatment is not illegal in most tellings due to both not being as harsh, and [[DeliberateValuesDissonance taking place before laws against child abuse were commonplace,]] and the Prince did not approach Cinderella is living in, and with the "ascension" he offers, marriage into royalty, is something that can be done almost instantly. explicit intention of helping her as Rhodes does Cinder, giving Cinderella far less incentive to explain things.

Top