Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5,6 (click to see context) from:
Despite the prominent Newbery medal on the cover, ''A Wrinkle in Time'' does ''not'' follow the DeathByNewberyMedal rule; in fact, it's firmly on the Cynical side of the SlidingScaleOfIdealismVersusCynicism. [[HighOctaneNightmareFuel Though you'd never guess it.]] Sort of.
to:
Despite the prominent Newbery medal on the cover, ''A Wrinkle in Time'' does ''not'' follow the DeathByNewberyMedal rule; in fact, it's firmly on the Cynical Idealism side of the SlidingScaleOfIdealismVersusCynicism. [[HighOctaneNightmareFuel Though you'd never guess it.]] Sort of.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* PunctuationShaker: An odd inversion: Meg's mother is "Mrs. Murry" but the witches are "Mrs Whatsit" and so forth. I.e., the witches don't have a period at the end of their "Mrs". What this ''means'' is up in the air...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
The Mrs Ws spell \"Mrs\" without a period, in contrast to Mrs. Murry.
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
The first book in the Time Quartet series by MadeleineLEngle, ''A Wrinkle in Time'' opens with the well-honored line "[[ItWasADarkAndStormyNight It was a dark and stormy night]]" and the appearance of a stranger at the Murry household. The stranger, who calls herself Mrs. Whatsit, turns out to be much more than the dotty old lady she initially comes across as. Soon, Meg Murry, her younger and precocious brother Charles Wallace, and her schoolmate Calvin find themselves on an interplanetary and interdimensional journey with Mrs. Whatsit and her equally odd buddies Mrs. Who and Mrs. Which to rescue Meg's missing father. To tell more would spoil your enjoyment of this unusual and fantastic (in more than one way) book.
to:
The first book in the Time Quartet series by MadeleineLEngle, ''A Wrinkle in Time'' opens with the well-honored line "[[ItWasADarkAndStormyNight It was a dark and stormy night]]" and the appearance of a stranger at the Murry household. The stranger, who calls herself Mrs. Mrs Whatsit, turns out to be much more than the dotty old lady she initially comes across as. Soon, Meg Murry, her younger and precocious brother Charles Wallace, and her schoolmate Calvin find themselves on an interplanetary and interdimensional journey with Mrs. Mrs Whatsit and her equally odd buddies Mrs. Mrs Who and Mrs. Mrs Which to rescue Meg's missing father. To tell more would spoil your enjoyment of this unusual and fantastic (in more than one way) book.
Changed line(s) 12 (click to see context) from:
* AFormYouAreComfortableWith: What the Mrs. W's use, with the possible exception of Mrs. Which, who has problems materializing fully and doesn't look like much of anything. Even when she does briefly materialize, she's in the form a "stereotypical witch".
to:
* AFormYouAreComfortableWith: What the Mrs. Mrs W's use, with the possible exception of Mrs. Mrs Which, who has problems materializing fully and doesn't look like much of anything. Even when she does briefly materialize, she's in the form a "stereotypical witch".
Changed line(s) 27 (click to see context) from:
* CloudCuckoolander: The Happy Medium comes off as this, but may also be a BunnyEarsLawyer (at being a Medium.) Mrs. Who and Whatsit also have overtones of this.
to:
* CloudCuckoolander: The Happy Medium comes off as this, but may also be a BunnyEarsLawyer (at being a Medium.) Mrs. Mrs Who and Whatsit also have overtones of this.
Changed line(s) 41 (click to see context) from:
* TheHecateSisters: Mrs. Who (matron), Mrs. Whatsit (maiden), & Mrs. Which (''very'' clearly the other one).
to:
* TheHecateSisters: Mrs. Mrs Who (matron), Mrs. Mrs Whatsit (maiden), & Mrs. Mrs Which (''very'' clearly the other one).
Changed line(s) 51 (click to see context) from:
* ItWasAGift: The children receive gifts from the Mrs. W's, when they first land on Camazotz. Later, Meg receives three gifts from the three Mrs. W's when she returns to rescue Charles Wallace from IT.
to:
* ItWasAGift: The children receive gifts from the Mrs. Mrs W's, when they first land on Camazotz. Later, Meg receives three gifts from the three Mrs. Mrs W's when she returns to rescue Charles Wallace from IT.
Changed line(s) 58 (click to see context) from:
* OurAngelsAreDifferent: Played with as far as the Mrs. W's go. We never find out what exactly they are (Mrs. Whatsit was a star once, but we don't know what she really is ''now''). At one point, though, Calvin describes them as angels for lack of a better description. Also, the first sequel, ''A Wind in the Door'', features Proginoskes, a [[InsistentTerminology cherubim]] who is much closer to [[TheBible Biblical]] depictions of angels than anything else you're likely to see in fiction.
to:
* OurAngelsAreDifferent: Played with as far as the Mrs. Mrs W's go. We never find out what exactly they are (Mrs. (Mrs Whatsit was a star once, but we don't know what she really is ''now''). At one point, though, Calvin describes them as angels for lack of a better description. Also, the first sequel, ''A Wind in the Door'', features Proginoskes, a [[InsistentTerminology cherubim]] who is much closer to [[TheBible Biblical]] depictions of angels than anything else you're likely to see in fiction.
Changed line(s) 62 (click to see context) from:
* PhlebotinumAnalogy: Used to explain how Mrs. Whatsit, Mrs. Who, and Mrs. Which "tesser" or "wrinkle" through space. Works for both Meg ''and'' the audience.
to:
* PhlebotinumAnalogy: Used to explain how Mrs. Mrs Whatsit, Mrs. Mrs Who, and Mrs. Mrs Which "tesser" or "wrinkle" through space. Works for both Meg ''and'' the audience.
Changed line(s) 66 (click to see context) from:
* ReallySevenHundredYearsOld: Mrs. Whatsit is over 2 billion years old, and she's described as being ''very'' young compared to her two companions.
to:
* ReallySevenHundredYearsOld: Mrs. Mrs Whatsit is over 2 billion years old, and she's described as being ''very'' young compared to her two companions.
Changed line(s) 75,77 (click to see context) from:
* VoluntaryShapeshifting: Mrs. Whatsit transforms into a winged being to escort Meg, Charles, and Calvin across the planet Uriel.
** Also, just for fun, Mrs. Which transforms into a witch with a broomstick at one point.
* WiseBeyondTheirYears: Charles Wallace, though Mrs. Whatsit warns him against the trap of {{Pride}} and arrogance.
** Also, just for fun, Mrs. Which transforms into a witch with a broomstick at one point.
* WiseBeyondTheirYears: Charles Wallace, though Mrs. Whatsit warns him against the trap of {{Pride}} and arrogance.
to:
* VoluntaryShapeshifting: Mrs. Mrs Whatsit transforms into a winged being to escort Meg, Charles, and Calvin across the planet Uriel.
** Also, just for fun,Mrs. Mrs Which transforms into a witch with a broomstick at one point.
* WiseBeyondTheirYears: Charles Wallace, thoughMrs. Mrs Whatsit warns him against the trap of {{Pride}} and arrogance.
** Also, just for fun,
* WiseBeyondTheirYears: Charles Wallace, though
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
** [[HighOctaneNightmareFuel "Amusing" here meaning "the human protagonists nearly died just from being there."]]
to:
** [[HighOctaneNightmareFuel "Amusing" here meaning "the human protagonists nearly died just from being there."]]"
Changed line(s) 19 (click to see context) from:
* The BigBad: IT.
to:
* The BigBad: IT.
Changed line(s) 21,22 (click to see context) from:
* The BiggerBad: The Black Thing.
* [[strike: BigBrotherIsWatching]] [[BigBrotherIsWatching IT Is Watching]]
* [[strike: BigBrotherIsWatching]] [[BigBrotherIsWatching IT Is Watching]]
to:
* The BiggerBad: The Black Thing.
*[[strike: BigBrotherIsWatching]] [[BigBrotherIsWatching IT Is Watching]]BigBrotherIsWatching
*
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Note though that many of the characters weren't present for a number of those adventures: the twins are in fact the biggest skeptics in the family until their journey back in time, since they had not been a part of (or seemingly particularly aware of, though surely their father reappearing after years of absence was explained) any of the previous adventures, but at the same time none of their family members were aware of THAT adventure either.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5,6 (click to see context) from:
Despite the prominent Newbery medal on the cover, ''A Wrinkle in Time'' does ''not'' follow the DeathByNewberyMedal rule; in fact, it's firmly on the Cynical side of the SlidingScaleOfIdealismVersusCynicism. [[HighOctaneNightmareFuel Though you'd never guess it.]]
to:
Despite the prominent Newbery medal on the cover, ''A Wrinkle in Time'' does ''not'' follow the DeathByNewberyMedal rule; in fact, it's firmly on the Cynical side of the SlidingScaleOfIdealismVersusCynicism. [[HighOctaneNightmareFuel Though you'd never guess it.]]
]] Sort of.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5,6 (click to see context) from:
Despite the prominent Newbery medal on the cover, ''A Wrinkle in Time'' does ''not'' follow the DeathByNewberyMedal rule; in fact, it's firmly on the left side of the SlidingScaleOfIdealismVersusCynicism. [[HighOctaneNightmareFuel Though you'd never guess it.]]
to:
Despite the prominent Newbery medal on the cover, ''A Wrinkle in Time'' does ''not'' follow the DeathByNewberyMedal rule; in fact, it's firmly on the left Cynical side of the SlidingScaleOfIdealismVersusCynicism. [[HighOctaneNightmareFuel Though you'd never guess it.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 64 (click to see context) from:
* ReallySevenHundredYearsOld: The three Mrs. W's are a couple billion years old.
to:
* ReallySevenHundredYearsOld: The three Mrs. W's are a couple Whatsit is over 2 billion years old.old, and she's described as being ''very'' young compared to her two companions.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 13,17 (click to see context) :
* AdaptationDecay: The film version, which came out in 2003, has aspects of this. The plot is rushed, events are missing, characterization is off and things are changed. In the film, Meg's parents are named Dana and Jack, while in the books, their names are Alex and Kate. Meg has no self-esteem issues, only school related ones. In the book, her self-esteem issues are quite prevalent. In the film, Calvin is only known for his basketball ability, while in the book he was more well-known for having skipped two grades and being a high school junior at 14.
** Also, the fact that Charles Wallace is a ChildProdigy is never mentioned in the film, only glossed over during the scene with the Man with the Red Eyes. He just comes across as a precocious child with mind-reading abilities. In the book, Charles Wallace's intelligence is very prominent and is the reason he is bullied in later books.
** The film also increased Charles Wallace's age. In the book, Charles Wallace is five and not yet in school; he does not start school until ''A Wind in the Door'', where he is bullied for his intelligence. In the film, Charles Wallace is six, and already attending school.
** The film also makes Charles Wallace appear more child-like than in the book. The book portrays Charles Wallace as an old soul struggling to fit in with those his own age. He knows he's intelligent, and tries but fails to hide it. He speaks and acts far beyond his own age. It is his pride that causes him to become posessed in Camazotz, and he is warned against it beforehand. In the film, Charles acts more like a child of six, and instead of his pride, it is his child-like desire to win whatever game he's playing that causes him to become posessed.
** Also, the twins have absolutely no characterization in the film. They appear maybe three times.
** Also, the fact that Charles Wallace is a ChildProdigy is never mentioned in the film, only glossed over during the scene with the Man with the Red Eyes. He just comes across as a precocious child with mind-reading abilities. In the book, Charles Wallace's intelligence is very prominent and is the reason he is bullied in later books.
** The film also increased Charles Wallace's age. In the book, Charles Wallace is five and not yet in school; he does not start school until ''A Wind in the Door'', where he is bullied for his intelligence. In the film, Charles Wallace is six, and already attending school.
** The film also makes Charles Wallace appear more child-like than in the book. The book portrays Charles Wallace as an old soul struggling to fit in with those his own age. He knows he's intelligent, and tries but fails to hide it. He speaks and acts far beyond his own age. It is his pride that causes him to become posessed in Camazotz, and he is warned against it beforehand. In the film, Charles acts more like a child of six, and instead of his pride, it is his child-like desire to win whatever game he's playing that causes him to become posessed.
** Also, the twins have absolutely no characterization in the film. They appear maybe three times.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Adding tropes about angels and demons as they seem to appear in the books.
Added DiffLines:
* OurAngelsAreDifferent: Played with as far as the Mrs. W's go. We never find out what exactly they are (Mrs. Whatsit was a star once, but we don't know what she really is ''now''). At one point, though, Calvin describes them as angels for lack of a better description. Also, the first sequel, ''A Wind in the Door'', features Proginoskes, a [[InsistentTerminology cherubim]] who is much closer to [[TheBible Biblical]] depictions of angels than anything else you're likely to see in fiction.
* OurDemonsAreDifferent: Similar to the example above, the Echthroi from the sequels. Somewhat averted, though, because they're never called demons, but they very much seem to fulfill that role.
* OurDemonsAreDifferent: Similar to the example above, the Echthroi from the sequels. Somewhat averted, though, because they're never called demons, but they very much seem to fulfill that role.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Slightly less pejorative wording.
Changed line(s) 79,80 (click to see context) from:
* YouKeepUsingThatWord: Probably one of the more infamous examples: the definition of tesseract in this book has nothing to do with its real meaning. L'Engle tries to get cute later on in the book by saying it's "an act of tessering", but the root word of "tesser" in Greek actually means "four" and has nothing to with warping space.
to:
* YouKeepUsingThatWord: Probably one of the more infamous examples: the definition of tesseract "tesseract" in this book has nothing to do with its real meaning. L'Engle tries to get cute The error is compounded later on in the book by saying it's "an act of tessering", but when the characters start using "to tesser" as a verb: the root word of "tesser" in Greek actually means "four" and has nothing to with warping space.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 79 (click to see context) from:
to:
* YouKeepUsingThatWord: Probably one of the more infamous examples: the definition of tesseract in this book has nothing to do with its real meaning. L'Engle tries to get cute later on in the book by saying it's "an act of tessering", but the root word of "tesser" in Greek actually means "four" and has nothing to with warping space.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 14,15 (click to see context) from:
** Also, the fact that Charles Wallace is a ChildProdigy is never mentioned in the film, only glossed over during the scene with the Man with the Red Eyes. He just comes across as a precocious child with mind-reading abilities. In the book, Charles Wallace's intelligence is very prominent and is the reason he's bullied.
** The film also increased Charles Wallace's age. In the book, Charles Wallace is five and not yet in school; he does not start school until ''A Wind in the Door'', where he is bullied for his intelligence.
** The film also increased Charles Wallace's age. In the book, Charles Wallace is five and not yet in school; he does not start school until ''A Wind in the Door'', where he is bullied for his intelligence.
to:
** Also, the fact that Charles Wallace is a ChildProdigy is never mentioned in the film, only glossed over during the scene with the Man with the Red Eyes. He just comes across as a precocious child with mind-reading abilities. In the book, Charles Wallace's intelligence is very prominent and is the reason he's bullied.
he is bullied in later books.
** The film also increased Charles Wallace's age. In the book, Charles Wallace is five and not yet in school; he does not start school until ''A Wind in the Door'', where he is bullied for his intelligence. In the film, Charles Wallace is six, and already attending school.
** The film also increased Charles Wallace's age. In the book, Charles Wallace is five and not yet in school; he does not start school until ''A Wind in the Door'', where he is bullied for his intelligence. In the film, Charles Wallace is six, and already attending school.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Charles Wallace has aspects of this, though is more grounded in reality than your average CloudCuckoolander.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* AdaptationDecay: The film version, which came out in 2003, has aspects of this. The plot is rushed, events are missing, characterization is off and things are changed. In the film, Meg's parents are named Dana and Jack, while in the books, their names are Alex and Kate. Meg has no self-esteem issues, only school related ones. In the book, her self-esteem issues are quite prevalent. In the film, Calvin is only known for his basketball ability, while in the book he was more well-known for having skipped two grades and being a high school junior at 14.
** Also, the fact that Charles Wallace is a ChildProdigy is never mentioned in the film, only glossed over during the scene with the Man with the Red Eyes. He just comes across as a precocious child with mind-reading abilities. In the book, Charles Wallace's intelligence is very prominent and is the reason he's bullied.
** The film also increased Charles Wallace's age. In the book, Charles Wallace is five and not yet in school; he does not start school until ''A Wind in the Door'', where he is bullied for his intelligence.
** The film also makes Charles Wallace appear more child-like than in the book. The book portrays Charles Wallace as an old soul struggling to fit in with those his own age. He knows he's intelligent, and tries but fails to hide it. He speaks and acts far beyond his own age. It is his pride that causes him to become posessed in Camazotz, and he is warned against it beforehand. In the film, Charles acts more like a child of six, and instead of his pride, it is his child-like desire to win whatever game he's playing that causes him to become posessed.
** Also, the twins have absolutely no characterization in the film. They appear maybe three times.
** Also, the fact that Charles Wallace is a ChildProdigy is never mentioned in the film, only glossed over during the scene with the Man with the Red Eyes. He just comes across as a precocious child with mind-reading abilities. In the book, Charles Wallace's intelligence is very prominent and is the reason he's bullied.
** The film also increased Charles Wallace's age. In the book, Charles Wallace is five and not yet in school; he does not start school until ''A Wind in the Door'', where he is bullied for his intelligence.
** The film also makes Charles Wallace appear more child-like than in the book. The book portrays Charles Wallace as an old soul struggling to fit in with those his own age. He knows he's intelligent, and tries but fails to hide it. He speaks and acts far beyond his own age. It is his pride that causes him to become posessed in Camazotz, and he is warned against it beforehand. In the film, Charles acts more like a child of six, and instead of his pride, it is his child-like desire to win whatever game he's playing that causes him to become posessed.
** Also, the twins have absolutely no characterization in the film. They appear maybe three times.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* GeniusBreedingAct: Meg's parents are both doctors; her father is a physicist, while her mother is a microbiologist.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* ParentalAbandonment: Meg's father, though by accident.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** [[HighOctaneNightmareFuel "Amusing" here meaning "the human protagonists nearly died just from being there."]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 29 (click to see context) from:
* DoesThisRemindYouOfAnything: Camazotz comes off as about one part 1950s America, two parts communist hell, and all parts bad. Although it's more just combining the worst of both the superpowers into one place.
to:
* DoesThisRemindYouOfAnything: Camazotz comes off across as about a combination of the worst points of both ColdWar superpowers: one part 1950s 1950's America, two parts communist hell, and one part Stalinist Russia, all parts bad. Although it's more just combining the worst of both the superpowers into one place.bad.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Clarification
Changed line(s) 12 (click to see context) from:
* AFormYouAreComfortableWith: What the Mrs. W's use, with the possible exception of Mrs. Which, who has problems materializing fully and doesn't look like much of anything.
to:
* AFormYouAreComfortableWith: What the Mrs. W's use, with the possible exception of Mrs. Which, who has problems materializing fully and doesn't look like much of anything. Even when she does briefly materialize, she's in the form a "stereotypical witch".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* CreepyChild: Charles Wallace, while under the influence of IT.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* BlackSheep: Calvin, in his family. The twins, Sandy and Dennys, in the Murray family, to a lesser extent. They're normal in a family of misfit intellectuals.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* ImprobablyHighIQ: Charles Wallace, who has an IQ that is off conventional charts.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,4 (click to see context) from:
http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/awrinkleintime.jpg
The first book in the Time Quartet series by Madeleine L'Engle, ''A Wrinkle in Time'' opens with the well-honored line "[[ItWasADarkAndStormyNight It was a dark and stormy night]]" and the appearance of a stranger at the Murry household. The stranger, who calls herself Mrs. Whatsit, turns out to be much more than the dotty old lady she initially comes across as. Soon, Meg Murry, her younger and precocious brother Charles Wallace, and her schoolmate Calvin find themselves on an interplanetary and interdimensional journey with Mrs. Whatsit and her equally odd buddies Mrs. Who and Mrs. Which to rescue Meg's missing father. To tell more would spoil your enjoyment of this unusual and fantastic (in more than one way) book.
The first book in the Time Quartet series by Madeleine L'Engle, ''A Wrinkle in Time'' opens with the well-honored line "[[ItWasADarkAndStormyNight It was a dark and stormy night]]" and the appearance of a stranger at the Murry household. The stranger, who calls herself Mrs. Whatsit, turns out to be much more than the dotty old lady she initially comes across as. Soon, Meg Murry, her younger and precocious brother Charles Wallace, and her schoolmate Calvin find themselves on an interplanetary and interdimensional journey with Mrs. Whatsit and her equally odd buddies Mrs. Who and Mrs. Which to rescue Meg's missing father. To tell more would spoil your enjoyment of this unusual and fantastic (in more than one way) book.
to:
The first book in the Time Quartet series by
Changed line(s) 61 (click to see context) from:
* UncannyValley: The people of Camazotz, and especially the Man With Red Eyes, derive their intense creepiness from this.
to:
* UncannyValley: Invoked. The people of Camazotz, and especially the Man With Red Eyes, derive their intense creepiness from this.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 56 (click to see context) from:
* ShesAManInJapan: The Happy Medium is a man in TheFilmOfTheBook, even though she's a woman in the book.
to:
* ShesAManInJapan: The Happy Medium is a played man who claims he's "beyond gender" in TheFilmOfTheBook, even though she's clearly a woman in the book.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* CreatorBacklash: When asked whether the obligatory Disney FilmOfTheBook met her expectations, L'Engle replied, "Yes, I expected it to be bad, and it is."