Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Literature / NotesFromUnderground

Go To

OR

Changed: 107

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Hikikomori}}: Possibly the most famous example in western literature.

to:

* {{Hikikomori}}: Possibly the most famous example in western literature. Disgusted by his society and himself, the Underground Man has decided to hide himself away from the world.

Changed: 612

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


%%* HookerWithAHeartOfGold: Liza.

to:

%%* * HookerWithAHeartOfGold: Liza.The innocent, compassionate Liza contrasts sharply with the cynical, selfish narrator. (He still tries to lecture her about morality, though.)



%%* NoNameGiven: The narrator.
%%* PhilosophicalNovel: A famous example.

to:

%%* * NoNameGiven: The narrator.
%%*
narrator only ever calls himself "I". Subsequent generations of readers and critics have come to refer to him as "The Underground Man".
*
PhilosophicalNovel: A famous example.example (the whole first half of the book is a diatribe about the state of the world and the nature of humanity), though notably the [[StrawNihilist nihilistic]] philosophy which the narrator espouses is just about the opposite of what Dostoevsky himself ''really'' believed.



* StrawNihilist: The UrExample.

to:

* StrawNihilist: The UrExample. The Underground Man is, essentially, Dostoevsky's caricature of a nihilist.

Added: 4

Changed: 11

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Commented out some Zero Context Examples


* HookerWithAHeartOfGold: Liza.

to:

* %%* HookerWithAHeartOfGold: Liza.



* NoNameGiven: The narrator.
* Main/PhilosophicalNovel: A famous example.

to:

* %%* NoNameGiven: The narrator.
* Main/PhilosophicalNovel: %%* PhilosophicalNovel: A famous example.



* UnreliableNarrator: We're not actually supposed to agree with the Underground Man in the end, and the second half of the book is largely there to show how morally bankrupt the philosophy he's been preaching to us really is.

to:

* UnreliableNarrator: We're not actually supposed to agree with the Underground Man in the end, and the second half of the book is largely there to show how morally bankrupt the philosophy he's been preaching to us really is.is.

----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TakeThat: Dostoevsky intended the book as a retort to Nikolai Chernyshevsky's 1863 socialist/utopian novel ''What Is to Be Done?'', specifically, as well as a takedown of nihilism and modernity in general. (Funnily enough, Chernyshevsky's book was itself a response to Ivan Turgenev's 1862 novel ''Fathers and Sons'', which first popularized nihilism as a term and an ideology in Russia; Dostoevsky also included an unflattering NoCelebritiesWereHarmed version of Turgenev in his later novel, ''Literature/{{Demons}}''.)

to:

* TakeThat: Dostoevsky intended the book as a retort to Nikolai Chernyshevsky's 1863 socialist/utopian novel ''What Is to Be Done?'', specifically, as well as a takedown of nihilism and modernity in general. (Funnily enough, Chernyshevsky's book was itself a response to Ivan Turgenev's Creator/IvanTurgenev's 1862 novel ''Fathers and Sons'', ''Literature/FathersAndSons'', which first popularized nihilism as a term and an ideology in Russia; Dostoevsky also included an unflattering NoCelebritiesWereHarmed version of Turgenev in his later novel, ''Literature/{{Demons}}''.)

Changed: 144

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TakeThat: Dostoevsky intended the book as a retort to Nikolai Chernyshevsky's 1863 socialist/utopian novel ''What Is to Be Done?'' specifically, as well as a takedown of nihilism and modernity in general. (Funnily enough, Chernyshevsky's book was itself a response to Ivan Turgenev's 1862 novel ''Fathers and Sons'', which first popularized nihilism as a term and a philosophy in Russia.)

to:

* TakeThat: Dostoevsky intended the book as a retort to Nikolai Chernyshevsky's 1863 socialist/utopian novel ''What Is to Be Done?'' Done?'', specifically, as well as a takedown of nihilism and modernity in general. (Funnily enough, Chernyshevsky's book was itself a response to Ivan Turgenev's 1862 novel ''Fathers and Sons'', which first popularized nihilism as a term and a philosophy an ideology in Russia.Russia; Dostoevsky also included an unflattering NoCelebritiesWereHarmed version of Turgenev in his later novel, ''Literature/{{Demons}}''.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* TakeThat: Dostoevsky intended the book as a retort to Nikolai Chernyshevsky's 1863 socialist/utopian novel ''What Is to Be Done?'' specifically, as well as a takedown of nihilism and modernity in general. (Funnily enough, Chernyshevsky's book was itself a response to Ivan Turgenev's 1862 novel ''Fathers and Sons'', which first popularized nihilism as a term and a philosophy in Russia.)

Changed: 11

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* UnreliableNarrator: We're not actually supposed to agree with the Underground Man, and the second half of the book is largely there to show how morally bankrupt the philosophy he's been preaching to us really is.

to:

* UnreliableNarrator: We're not actually supposed to agree with the Underground Man, Man in the end, and the second half of the book is largely there to show how morally bankrupt the philosophy he's been preaching to us really is.

Added: 161

Changed: 624

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DownerEnding
* ForegoneConclusion: A minor case, since the second half of the book is a flashback.
* {{Hikikomori}}

to:

* DownerEnding
DownerEnding: [[spoiler: The Underground Man drives Liza, and with her any hope of a positive human connection, away, leaving him even more lonely and bitter than before. As for ''her'' fate... well, we never find out either way.]]
* ForegoneConclusion: A minor case, since the second half of the book is a flashback.
{{Flashback}}.
* {{Hikikomori}}{{Hikikomori}}: Possibly the most famous example in western literature.



* HowWeGotHere: The novel's second half is a flashback showcasing a few of the experiences that molded the narrator into the person he is when we first meet him.



* MindScrew

to:

* MindScrewMindScrew: It's Dostoevsky, after all. Among other things, most of the book is a screed for a worldview that the author doesn't even hold.



* Main/PhilosophicalNovel

to:

* Main/PhilosophicalNovelMain/PhilosophicalNovel: A famous example.



* UnreliableNarrator

to:

* UnreliableNarratorUnreliableNarrator: We're not actually supposed to agree with the Underground Man, and the second half of the book is largely there to show how morally bankrupt the philosophy he's been preaching to us really is.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Main/PhilosophicalNovel

Added: 91

Changed: 26

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[quoteright:350:https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/notes_from_underground.jpg]]



Deals with themes of existentialism (it is considered one of the first existentialist novels), free will, and the modern disconnect from others.

to:

Deals with themes of existentialism {{UsefulNotes/Existentialism}} (it is considered one of the first existentialist novels), free will, and the modern disconnect from others.



%%* DownerEnding

to:

%%* * DownerEnding



%%* {{Hikikomori}}
%%* HookerWithAHeartOfGold: Liza.

to:

%%* * {{Hikikomori}}
%%* * HookerWithAHeartOfGold: Liza.



%%* MindScrew

to:

%%* * MindScrew



%%* UnreliableNarrator

to:

%%* * UnreliableNarrator

Added: 80

Changed: 2

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


''Notes from Underground'' is an 1863 novel by Creator/FyodorDostoevsky about an unnamed social outcast living in St. Petersburg. Depressed by the city and his own inadequacy, this mysterious Underground Man begins to write a rambling, philosophical journal -- the Notes from Underground.

to:

''Notes from Underground'' is an 1863 1864 novel by Creator/FyodorDostoevsky about an unnamed social outcast living in St. Petersburg. Depressed by the city and his own inadequacy, this mysterious Underground Man begins to write a rambling, philosophical journal -- the Notes from Underground.


Added DiffLines:

* AntiHero: The character calls himself exactly that ("антигерой" in Russian).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DownerEnding

to:

* %%* DownerEnding



* {{Hikikomori}}
* HookerWithAHeartOfGold: Liza.

to:

* %%* {{Hikikomori}}
* %%* HookerWithAHeartOfGold: Liza.



* MindScrew

to:

* %%* MindScrew



* UnreliableNarrator

to:

* %%* UnreliableNarrator

Added: 31

Removed: 34

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
updated trope name


* NietzscheWannabe: The UrExample.


Added DiffLines:

* StrawNihilist: The UrExample.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Moved to YMMV and Trivia pages


* FanNickname: A quite popular one, as most scholars refer to the narrator as the Underground Man.



* FoeYay: Between the Underground Man and the soldier he stalks for a while.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AuthorTract Noticeably averted -- the author's opinions fell just about opposite of the Underground Man's. Dostoevsky was actually using the character as an example of what he saw as the degradation of the human condition.

to:

* AuthorTract AuthorTract: Noticeably averted -- the author's opinions fell just about opposite of the Underground Man's. Dostoevsky was actually using the character as an example of what he saw as the degradation of the human condition.



* FanNickname A quite popular one, as most scholars refer to the narrator as the Underground Man.
* ForegoneConclusion A minor case, since the second half of the book is a flashback.

to:

* FanNickname FanNickname: A quite popular one, as most scholars refer to the narrator as the Underground Man.
* ForegoneConclusion ForegoneConclusion: A minor case, since the second half of the book is a flashback.



* FoeYay Between the Underground Man and the soldier he stalks for a while.
* HookerWithAHeartOfGold Liza.
* JerkWithAHeartOfGold Debatable on the "heart of gold" part, but he does seem to regret everything he's done.
* LonersAreFreaks The narrator is really terrible at making friends, partly because he's abrasive and rude, and partly because he has major social anxiety.

to:

* FoeYay FoeYay: Between the Underground Man and the soldier he stalks for a while.
* HookerWithAHeartOfGold HookerWithAHeartOfGold: Liza.
* JerkWithAHeartOfGold JerkWithAHeartOfGold: Debatable on the "heart of gold" part, but he does seem to regret everything he's done.
* LonersAreFreaks LonersAreFreaks: The narrator is really terrible at making friends, partly because he's abrasive and rude, and partly because he has major social anxiety.



* NoNameGiven The narrator.
* SlidingScaleOfIdealismVersusCynicism Played straight and then invoked. The Underground Man is quite cynical, but works himself up to an idealistic zeal when lecturing the prostitute (whom he's just slept with) on family.

to:

* NoNameGiven NoNameGiven: The narrator.
* SlidingScaleOfIdealismVersusCynicism SlidingScaleOfIdealismVersusCynicism: Played straight and then invoked. The Underground Man is quite cynical, but works himself up to an idealistic zeal when lecturing the prostitute (whom he's just slept with) on family.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


->"...what is man without desire, without will, and without wishes if not a stop in an organ pipe?"

to:

->"...->''"...what is man without desire, without will, and without wishes if not a stop in an organ pipe?"
pipe?"''



* UnreliableNarrator

to:

* UnreliableNarrator
UnreliableNarrator
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Changed the innacurate statement that \'Notes\' preceded the existentialist movement


Deals with themes of existentialism (though it predates the actual movement), free will, and the modern disconnect from others.

to:

Deals with themes of existentialism (though it predates (it is considered one of the actual movement), first existentialist novels), free will, and the modern disconnect from others.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* UnreliableNarrator

to:

* UnreliableNarratorUnreliableNarrator
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* NietzscheWannabe

to:

* NietzscheWannabeNietzscheWannabe: The UrExample.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


''Notes from Underground'' is an 1863 novel by Creator/FyodorDostoevsky about an unnamed social outcast living in St. Petersburg. Depressed by the city and his own inadequacy, this mysterious Underground Man begins to write a rambling, philosophical journal -- the NotesFromUnderground.

to:

''Notes from Underground'' is an 1863 novel by Creator/FyodorDostoevsky about an unnamed social outcast living in St. Petersburg. Depressed by the city and his own inadequacy, this mysterious Underground Man begins to write a rambling, philosophical journal -- the NotesFromUnderground.
Notes from Underground.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

->"...what is man without desire, without will, and without wishes if not a stop in an organ pipe?"

''Notes from Underground'' is an 1863 novel by Creator/FyodorDostoevsky about an unnamed social outcast living in St. Petersburg. Depressed by the city and his own inadequacy, this mysterious Underground Man begins to write a rambling, philosophical journal -- the NotesFromUnderground.

The novel's divided into two parts: first, the notes ("Underground"), and second, an account of the humiliating events which led to his self-imposed seclusion ("Apropos to Wet Snow").

Deals with themes of existentialism (though it predates the actual movement), free will, and the modern disconnect from others.
----
!!This work provides examples of

* AuthorTract Noticeably averted -- the author's opinions fell just about opposite of the Underground Man's. Dostoevsky was actually using the character as an example of what he saw as the degradation of the human condition.
* BigHam: The thing with a lot of Dostoevsky's characters is that they work on extremes. They may not always be in your face bombastic and they may not be loud, but they take whatever trait they have to (or past) its logical extreme to the point of ridiculous, [[RuleOfSymbolism and it serves a purpose]].
* DownerEnding
* FanNickname A quite popular one, as most scholars refer to the narrator as the Underground Man.
* ForegoneConclusion A minor case, since the second half of the book is a flashback.
* {{Hikikomori}}
* FoeYay Between the Underground Man and the soldier he stalks for a while.
* HookerWithAHeartOfGold Liza.
* JerkWithAHeartOfGold Debatable on the "heart of gold" part, but he does seem to regret everything he's done.
* LonersAreFreaks The narrator is really terrible at making friends, partly because he's abrasive and rude, and partly because he has major social anxiety.
* MindScrew
* NietzscheWannabe
* NoNameGiven The narrator.
* SlidingScaleOfIdealismVersusCynicism Played straight and then invoked. The Underground Man is quite cynical, but works himself up to an idealistic zeal when lecturing the prostitute (whom he's just slept with) on family.
* UnreliableNarrator

Top