Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
grammar
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
Canonical depictions of a relationship kills the appeal of a ship.
to:
Canonical depictions of a relationship kills kill the appeal of a ship.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
-->[-Huh. That hardly lived up to the anticipation. Better [[ShippingBedDeath go back to the main article]].-]
to:
-->[-Huh. That hardly lived up to the anticipation. Better Guess I'll just go back to the [[ShippingBedDeath go back to the main article]].unabridged version]].-]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
The actual relationship kills the appeal of a ship.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Removed invalid markup
Deleted line(s) 2 (click to see context) :
Changed line(s) 5,6 (click to see context) from:
----
<<|LaconicWiki|>>
<<|LaconicWiki|>>
to:
<<|LaconicWiki|>>
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
No idea what a reference to OCOS is doing here. In fact, OCOS is a great way to avoid this trope.
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
[[OfficialCoupleOrdealSyndrome The actual relationship]] kills the appeal of a ship.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
OfficialCoupleOrdealSyndrome kills the appeal of a ship.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
The OfficialCouple is less interesting when they actually get together.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
-->[-Visit unabridged version [[ShippingBedDeath HERE]]-]
to:
