History Headscratchers / ZapDramatic

* In "The Suspects", Mr. and Mrs. Tart say that Angie was never the same after losing her father in a freak accident. In the same episode, Yale says that Angie's father is alive and living in a Florida rest home. Is this seeming discrepancy ever explained?

* What's with Rolf's pet mouse in "The Raise"? He doesn't give helpful advice, at all. (Then again, [[StrawManHasAPoint maybe he does]], but [[MoonLogicPuzzle it doesn't work with the bizarre logic of these games]]). For example, if you follow his advice and just "get to the point" of why you want to see the boss, you won't progress. Instead, [[InsaneTrollLogic you have to be an intrusive jerk and go down a rabbit hole into your employer's personal life in order to succeed]]. Anyway, is the mouse just a [[RedHerring red herring]]?

* What's with Rolf's pet mouse in "The Raise"? He doesn't give helpful advice, at all. (Then again, [[StrawManHasAPoint maybe he does, but it doesn't work with the bizarre logic of these games]]). For example, if you follow his advice and just "get to the point" of why you want to see the boss, you won't progress. Instead, you have to be an intrusive jerk and go [[DownTheRabbitHole down a rabbit hole]] into your employer's personal life in order to succeed. Anyway, is the mouse just a [[RedHerring red herring]]?

* What's with Rolf's pet mouse in "The Raise"? He doesn't give helpful advice, at all. (Then again, [[StrawManHasAPoint maybe he does, but it doesn't work with the bizarre logic of these games]]). For example, if you follow his advice and just "get to the point" of why you want to see the boss, you won't progress. Instead, you have to be an intrusive jerk and go down a rabbit hole into your employer's personal life in order to succeed. Anyway, is the mouse just a red herring?

* What's with Rolf's pet mouse in "The Raise"? He doesn't give helpful advice, at all. (Then again, [[StrawManHasAPoint maybe he does, but it doesn't work with the bizarre logic of these games]]). For example, if you follow his advice and just "get to the point" of why you want to see the boss, you won't progress. Instead, you have to be an intrusive jerk and go down a rabbit hole into your employer's personal life. Anyway, is the mouse just a red herring?

** Having seen a bit more of ZapDramatic, I guess I'll go ahead and explain this to myself and anyone else who may be wondering. Ted Hartrup doesn't look that much like a CreatorsPet in ''Ambition'', but if you go on to see more of ZD's work it becomes obvious. He becomes much cooler and smarter in ''Sir Basil Pike Public School'', and stars in a number of other Michael Gibson videos, usually to rant about things Gibson dislikes. He basically becomes an ''AuthorAvatar'', which is why he's called CreatorsPet.

* Why do people keep saying that Ted is a CreatorsPet? Okay, look, I get it. He does some crazy stuff and gets away with it, and there was that long monologue in Episode 3 that felt like an AuthorTract, but for all the people calling him a "discount Hannibal Lecter" they seem to be ignoring that he never comes across as anything other than an idiot! For example, the only way to get him on your side in Episode 10 is to tell him that ''{{Satan}}'' put a bomb in your car. I'm not saying believing in God or the Devil makes you crazy, but seriously? Telling him people are trying to frame him for murder won't do it, you have to play to his delusions by telling him the DEVIL HIMSELF is behind everything. Oh, and if you try to work with him against the villains then you get shot, by him and apparently by accident, ''because he's just that incompetent''. ZapDramatic does obviously want us to think of Ted Hartrup as being innocent, but he never comes across as much more than that to me.

* Why do people keep saying that Ted is a CreatorsPet? Okay, look, I get it. He does some crazy stuff and gets away with it, and there was that long monologue in Episode 3 that felt like an AuthorTract, but for all the people calling him a "discount Hannibal Lecter" they seem to be ignoring that he never comes across as anything other than an idiot! The only way to get him on your side in Episode 10 is to tell him that ''{{Satan}}'' put a bomb in your car, and if you try to work with him against the villains then you get shot, by him and apparently by accident, ''because he's just that incompetent''. ZapDramatic does obviously want us to think of Ted Hartrup as being innocent, but he never comes across as much more than that to me.

* How does this guy manage to win awards and get money from companies for this despite the bad quality, (even in the early 2000s this stuff was never great looking)?

** Or perhaps he's planning to have himself cryogenically frozen. Man, what a setting for one of these games that would be!

** For a possible answer see WhatCouldHaveBeen in the trivia tab.

* The series seems to [[{{Retcon}} waffle]] on Ted's mental condition during his turn as a suicide bomber. Was Ted determined to be:

*** If your Persuasive Power is too low there and you don't use the Skip button, Janina will notice and offer to boost it to 80 in exchange for being her friend. Then if you get sent back in time for antagonizing Janina into fighting you as a girl, she'll evaluate your Persuasive Power again if you try to use your lack of it as an excuse.

* Does the Persuasive Power in the Sir Basil Pike game ever factor into anything?

* If these games do indeed take place within the same continuity, then the timeline makes absolutely no sense. ''Sir Basil Pike Public School'' was initially thought to take place after ''Ambition'', but Duke Crabtree appears in ''Sir Basil Pike'' as a student, and he looks significantly younger than he did in ''Ambition''. So, it's a prequel, right? Well, not exactly. Ted Hartrup also appears in ''Sir Basil Pike'' as a math teacher, and he looks exactly the same as he did in ''Ambition''. Furthermore, it is mentioned in ''Ambition'' that Ted was a construction worker. It is possible that Ted simply quit his teaching job to become a construction worker, but if you assume that this all happened within the time it would take Duke to grow into his ''Ambition'' appearance, then it would make no sense for Ted to look exactly the same in ''Ambition'' as in ''Sir Basil Pike''. Duke looks about ten years younger than his ''Ambition'' incarnation, and even if Ted doesn't show aging, he'd still look at least slightly different by the time he threatened to blow Klink International to Hell.

*** [[http://www.zapdramatic.com/swf/amb10promo.swf An old promo for Episode 10]] describes Angie's diagnosis thusly: "At Ted's bail hearing, Dr. Raleigh tells the judge that Ted is suffering from delusions brought on by the experimental drug 'Paxwic'." So although episode 4 didn't show it, it would seem that Angie let everyone know about the Paxwic right then and there. Was Ted's judgment so permanently affected by the drug that he never realized the court was determining that he was not entirely responsible for his actions and might be rehabilitated after all?

** Under the influence of Paxwic, with the bomb planted on him in his sleep? Did Angie cover up the result of the police drug test for a while? If so, why would Angie lie about the presence of a drug she was trying to implicate as dangerous anyway, and why did Ted act as if he came up with the suicide bomb himself when he immediately blamed Bridget for everything else that day? Was Angie aware of the murderous conspiracy and trying to skirt detection for long enough to complete a stronger case against Paxwic? And does Paxwic have the rather specific effect of making one claim responsibility for weapons like the detonator?