Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / WillyWonkaAndTheChocolateFactory

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Presumably there were some hidden Loompas, workshopping a song about stealing fizzy drinks, if Joe and Charlie hadn't worked out how to burp their way back to Earth.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


[[folder:Wonka and the Fizzy Lifting Drinks]]
* How did Wonka find out that Charlie and Grandpa Joe stole the Fizzy Lifting Drinks? He wasn't there, never noticed the two were gone, there were no workers and no security cameras. And yet, after the tour, he knows perfectly well about what they did.
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Or deceased. Or never existed--just a corporate mascot designed to sell a second-rate candy, like [[Recap/TheSimpsonsS3E10FlamingMoes Tipsy]] [[https://getyarn.io/yarn-clip/c4b76691-2d56-4f03-aa91-4a1b4806e22e McStaggers]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** At the time the movie was made, it was common for working-class women to find employment in the kind of low-intensity, low-skill industrialised food-production job that a peanut-shelling factory would offer; it didn't require skills or much in the way of physical strength, was comparatively less dangerous than other industrial / manufacturing roles, and wasn't really in high demand among men. The "all-women" depiction is likely exaggerated for effect (to distinguish between Mr Salt as the one in charge and the women who are subordinate to him), but it did reflect reality to a point.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** More likely, Wonka is just a ConsummateLiar and simply said that the river needed to stay clean as part of Augustus' SecretTestOfCharacter. If we believe that the chocolate in the river will eventually end up in commercial products, there'd have to be some unseen mechanism to remove impurities in the chocolate given how we see Oompa-Loompas working by the river without any sort of sanitary equipment.

Added: 126

Changed: 3

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** An simpler theory would be that the chocolate bars containing the tickets weren't actually shipped out: Wilkinson himself could have just planted each one on a store shelf with the "normal" bars and then waited nearby to see who bought it. Or, in Veruca's case, he planted it in one of the boxes in the factory and then waited until someone found it for her. Since Mr. Salt's workers had been searching for five days by the time it was found, that probably means that word had gotten out of how incredibly spoiled Veruca was, hence the decision (whether it was Wonka's or Wilkinson's) to target her specifically for lesson-teaching rather than another random person.

to:

*** An A simpler theory would be that the chocolate bars containing the tickets weren't actually shipped out: Wilkinson himself could have just planted each one on a store shelf with the "normal" bars and then waited nearby to see who bought it. Or, in Veruca's case, he planted it in one of the boxes in the factory and then waited until someone found it for her. Since Mr. Salt's workers had been searching for five days by the time it was found, that probably means that word had gotten out of how incredibly spoiled Veruca was, hence the decision (whether it was Wonka's or Wilkinson's) to target her specifically for lesson-teaching rather than another random person.



Is there some intended symbolism behind everything in Willy Wonka's office being cut in half, or is it just a random Dahl quirk?

to:

* Is there some intended symbolism behind everything in Willy Wonka's office being cut in half, or is it just a random Dahl quirk?quirk?
** It's a joke about how Wonka has half a mind about everything. You can never tell exactly where he's gonna land on an issue.

Added: 480

Changed: 1

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** An simpler theory would be that the chocolate bars containing the tickets weren't actually shipped out: Wilkinson himself could have just planted each one on a store shelf with the "normal" bars and then waited nearby to see who bought it. Or, in Veruca's case, he planted it in one of the boxes in the factory and then waited until someone found it for her. Since Mr. Salt's workers had been searching for five days by the time it was found, that probably means that word had gotten out of how incredibly spoiled Veruca was, hence the decision (whether it was Wonka's or Wilkinson's) to target her specificially for lesson-teaching rather than another random person.

to:

*** An simpler theory would be that the chocolate bars containing the tickets weren't actually shipped out: Wilkinson himself could have just planted each one on a store shelf with the "normal" bars and then waited nearby to see who bought it. Or, in Veruca's case, he planted it in one of the boxes in the factory and then waited until someone found it for her. Since Mr. Salt's workers had been searching for five days by the time it was found, that probably means that word had gotten out of how incredibly spoiled Veruca was, hence the decision (whether it was Wonka's or Wilkinson's) to target her specificially specifically for lesson-teaching rather than another random person.


Added DiffLines:

** He sneaks into to meet Augustus, Violet, and Mike by posing as a reporter. So he could have heard where the reporters were going, and then just went in with them. Veruca's father bought so many boxes that he could have just figured one of them probably contained a ticket, and snuck, bluffed, or bribed his way in. The real question is how he learned about Charlie finding one. Either the news spread ''very'' quickly, or he did indeed know where the last ticket was all along.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Because he enjoys watching women working on his Salty peanuts?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[folder:Wonka's Office Decor]]
Is there some intended symbolism behind everything in Willy Wonka's office being cut in half, or is it just a random Dahl quirk?
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

*** Furthermore, for all we know Wonka is in negotiations to make his shrinking technology available to those who might be able to find a way to cure cancer with it; it just doesn't come up because, let's face it, cancer is kind of a mood killer.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The Doylist explanation is that this would have unnecessarily bogged down the movie. The Watsonian explanation is, well, because it ultimately wasn't ''that'' bad, on the other side at least. Sure, it was a MindScrew at the time, but when you boil it down it was basically a trippy fairground haunted house ride, it's not like anyone died from it. What's anyone gonna do, threaten to sue Wonka for a ride being scary? "Wow, that was scary" is basically the appropriate reaction when the dust settles.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


[[folder: Why Aren't The Characters More Upset At Wonka After The Scary Tunnel?]]
* After they get there, they basically just say "Wow, that was scary", and then [[BigLippedAlligatorMoment they never bring it up again.]] Why didn't any of them say something like "What the '''hell''' was that about, Wonka!"
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


[[folder: Why Are All The Workers At Mr.Salt's peanut factory female?]]
* Title says it all
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** "The (Grim) Reaper" is an old term for death. The Reaper, in most traditional depictions, carries with him/her/it a scythe which is used to cut down -- or "mow" -- the souls of the living. And he's 'grisly' because his business is rather grim and macabre (he's also technically 'gristly' because he tends to be depicted as a skeletal figure, meaning he's somewhat sinewy). Wonka is basically creeping everyone out by melodramatically pondering whether they've entered some kind of portal leading to their deaths.

to:

** "The (Grim) Reaper" is an old term term/personification for death. The Reaper, in most traditional depictions, carries with him/her/it a scythe which is used to cut down -- or "mow" -- the souls of the living. And he's 'grisly' because his business is rather grim and macabre (he's also technically 'gristly' because he tends to be depicted as a skeletal figure, meaning he's somewhat sinewy). Wonka is basically creeping everyone out by melodramatically pondering whether they've entered some kind of portal leading to their deaths.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** "The (Grim) Reaper" is an old term for death. The Reaper, in most traditional depictions, carries with him/her/it a scythe which is used to cut down -- or "mow" -- the souls of the living. And he's 'grisly' because his business is rather grim and macabre (he's also technically 'gristly' because he tends to be depicted as a skeletal figure, meaning he's somewhat sinewy). Wonka is basically creeping everyone by melodramatically pondering whether they've entered some kind of portal leading to their deaths.

to:

** "The (Grim) Reaper" is an old term for death. The Reaper, in most traditional depictions, carries with him/her/it a scythe which is used to cut down -- or "mow" -- the souls of the living. And he's 'grisly' because his business is rather grim and macabre (he's also technically 'gristly' because he tends to be depicted as a skeletal figure, meaning he's somewhat sinewy). Wonka is basically creeping everyone out by melodramatically pondering whether they've entered some kind of portal leading to their deaths.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** "The (Grim) Reaper" is an old term for death. The Reaper, in most traditional depictions, carries with him/her/it a scythe which is used to cut down -- or "mow" -- the souls of the living. And he's 'grisly' because his business is rather grim and macabre (he's also technically 'gristly' because he tends to be depicted as a skeletal figure, meaning he's somewhat sinewy). Wonka is basically creeping everyone by melodramatically pondering whether they've entered some kind of portal leading to their deaths.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** According to some featurette or behind-the-scenes bit of trivia, Gene Wilder allegedly ad-libbed some of Wonka's dialogue during the tunnel scene. The moment when Grandpa Joe protectively puts his arm around Charlie was said to be a genuine reaction by Jack Alberston to what was happening, as Wilder's performance in the moment was that unnerving.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


[[folder: Gristly Reaper?]]
* What the hell is the "Gristly (Grizzly?) Reaper" that Wonka sings about? And why would it be mowing?
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Also worth considering: the only word we have that Willy Wonka actually has discovered an everlasting gobstopper is from Willy Wonka himself. The whole thing is a SecretTestOfCharacter to begin with, to determine if any of them are fit to inherit his factory. Wonka is insistent that no one reveals anything about the gobstopper because he's testing their trustworthiness.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Quite possibly; hiding five golden tickets among millions of chocolate bars around the world ''is'' quite the undertaking, to be fair. Though there is a [=WMG=] floating around that Wonka either deliberately chose these specific children to visit his factory or, if we don't buy that he's quite so omnipotent, actually had his "Slugworth" employee plant a "ticketed" chocolate bar at a time and place of his choosing to make sure it was found by someone; if the latter specifically is true, then presumably Charlie's ticket was planted last-minute for dramatic effect, and close enough to the factory that the lucky winner wouldn't have far to travel in order to make it to the tour (or, if the former is true, then Wonka knew Charlie lived close by and so knew he could take his time).

to:

** Quite possibly; hiding finding five golden tickets hidden among hundreds of millions of chocolate bars around the world ''is'' quite the undertaking, to be fair. Though there is a [=WMG=] floating around that Wonka either deliberately chose these specific children to visit his factory or, if we don't buy that he's quite so omnipotent, actually had his "Slugworth" employee plant a "ticketed" chocolate bar at a time and place of his choosing to make sure it was found by someone; if the latter specifically is true, then presumably Charlie's ticket was planted last-minute for dramatic effect, and close enough to the factory that the lucky winner wouldn't have far to travel in order to make it to the tour (or, if the former is true, then Wonka knew Charlie lived close by and so knew he could take his time).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** And ultimately, if there's no plan and only four out of the five tickets get found, then ''que sera sera''; Wonka just hosts the tour with the four winners instead of five.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Quite possibly; hiding five golden tickets among millions of chocolate bars around the world ''is'' quite the undertaking, to be fair. Though there is a [=WMG=] floating around that Wonka either deliberately chose these specific children to visit his factory or, if we don't buy that he's quite so omnipotent, actually had his "Slugworth" employee plant a "ticketed" chocolate bar at a time and place of his choosing to make sure it was found by someone; if the latter specifically is true, then presumably Charlie's ticket was planted last-minute for dramatic effect, and close enough to the factory that the lucky winner wouldn't have far to travel in order to make it to the tour (or, if the former is true, then Wonka knew Charlie lived close by and so knew he could take his time).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
You're quite right. On watching back I was misremembering and my poor reaction was based on a false recollection. Sincere apologies to the OP.

Added DiffLines:

** On watching back, Charlie's conscience is clearly nagging at him in that scene. Even if he has no intention of selling the gobstopper to "Slugworth", he doesn't feel like he deserves such a wonderful gift from Wonka as an everlasting sweet. It's ''because'' he's a good kid, really; having taken advantage of Wonka's trust, Charlie clearly feels it would thus be wrong to also take advantage of Wonka's generosity. Since he indulged in the fizzy lifting drink, he returns the gobstopper as compensation, thus evening the scales. And since Charlie is a poor kid who would either benefit financially from selling the gobstopper or just from having a permanent sweet to enjoy, the gesture is even more impressive.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Charlie didn't steal the Gobstopper, he and every child was given one to keep. The only thing he stole was the Fizzy Lifting Drinks.


** It's slightly discouraging that this is a headscratcher; it's ''because'' Charlie is "an honest kid". Whether Wonka knows about the deal with Slugworth or not, Charlie has ''stolen'' the Gobstopper. It's not his to keep. If he kept it, he would cease to be an honest kid, because swiping someone else's property after they've made it clear you're not to touch it and sneaking it away with you is a dishonest act. Returning it to Wonka is basically Charlie owning up to what he did and making restitution for it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[folder: Ticket Time]]
* Willy Wonka, for obvious reasons, proceeded very carefully with the idea of disseminating Golden Tickets - and yet it turns out that the last ticket was only found a day before the grand event, with a real risk that there just wouldn't be enough time for the winner to actually come to the Wonka Factory. Did Willy actually underestimate how much time it would take for people to find all the tickets?
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Also... Willy Wonka uses the device for making chocolate products instead of curing cancer because ''he's a chocolate maker, not a cancer surgeon''. It's his business to make and sell chocolate, not cure cancer, and just because he somehow created a device for shrinking things doesn't mean he'd have the first idea how to go about curing cancer with it; there's not a heck of a lot of overlap between the skills of a chocolatier, even one who can master shrinking, and oncology. If we need an answer for this, it's almost certainly because he figures that his messing about with the bodies of cancer patients with his shrink ray will likely cause more harm to them than good and so decides to just stick with what he's already good at.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** "I have ears everywhere." How are the kids going to know to argue with him? They're ''kids''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** This is a WhereInTheHellIsSpringfield situation. The filmmakers deliberately created this ambiguity in order to give the movie a timeless, universal feel; it's not set in the real world, it's set in a storybook fantasy land. There is no right answer to the question, because it's not really a question at all; it's intentional, because it's really set anywhere that children love chocolate, which is pretty much everywhere.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Also, "completely unfair"? These aren't puzzles you need to be Sherlock Holmes to solve; you just need to have, you know, a basic moral compass and willingness to listen to someone else instead of immediately and recklessly fulfilling your own selfish urges. The way to "solve" the problem Violet found herself in was to ''not eat the gum in the first place''. It's not unfair in the slightest that she immediately found herself smacked by the consequences of her own poor and selfish decision, it's just the consequences of her own poor and selfish decision.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** To add to the above, everything we know about the Everlasting Gobstopper comes from Wonka himself. There might not even ''be'' a "real" prototype.

Top