Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / UltimateMarvel

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* The reveal in New Ultimates vs Ultimate Avengers that there was a Hulk before Bruce Banner, whose serum is actually [[spoiler:a pill that turns you into a Hulk that has normal skin color, retains your intelligence and personality, and only lasts 24 hours, while still allowing for transformations between human and hulk. Oh yeah, and this version was actually completed before the "original" Hulk's.]] And no one during the whole Super Soldier race thought that this might be their best option, or at least a good enough one to stop experimenting with other powers? It solves all of the major issues, including the fact that anyone who went AWOL would now be a liability with powers.



<<|ItJustBugsMe|>>

to:

<<|ItJustBugsMe|>><<|Headscratchers|>>
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** And now, they've killed off [spoiler: Spider-Man.] When will it end?

to:

** And now, they've killed off [spoiler: [[spoiler: Spider-Man.] ]] When will it end?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** And now, they've killed off [spoiler: Spider-Man.] When will it end?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** It's '''canon''' that Ultimate Cap's shield can absorb falling damage like nothing. In ''The Ultimates'' first issue, Bucky states that Captain America always jumps from planes without parachutes, because these "are for wussies".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
stealth complaining


* Ultimatum. Just, Ultimatum. They kill off all these important (and popular) characters quickly, no warning, and for no reason other than shock value. That is just LAZY writing! If you want to kill off a character, do it for a good REASON. Do it to help further the story along. But don't do it to just "shock" the reader. Who at Marvel really thought that just killing characters off like that was a good idea? Seriously.

to:

* Ultimatum. Just, Ultimatum. They kill off all these important (and popular) characters quickly, no warning, and for no reason other than shock value. That is just LAZY writing! If you want to kill off a character, do it for a good REASON. Do it to help further the story along. But don't do it to just "shock" the reader. Who at Marvel really thought that just killing characters off like that was a good idea? Seriously.

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Ultimatum. Just, Ultimatum. They kill off all these important (and popular) characters quickly, no warning, and for no reason other than shock value. That is just LAZY writing! If you want to kill off a character, do it for a good REASON. Do it to help further the story along. But don't do it to just "shock" the reader. Who at Marvel really thought that just killing characters off like that was a good idea? Seriously.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* After all my favorite characters die in Ultimatum, the three remaining X-men I like disappear off the face of the earth. What happened to Rouge? Or Iceman? Them still being teenagers and known mutants would have been interesting. And then theres Colossus the one I would have loved to see develop more but was reduced to brute rolls in later arcs should have at least gotten a mention in a series that is focusing on Wolverine's son, And with [[Spoiler:Nightcrawler and Jean-Paul both dying in Ultimatum]] I would have very much enjoyed seeing him cope and grow as a character and see how he will work without Banshee but they decide to make Kate or should I say [[spoiler:Jean]] the new leader to the new team of mutants. I would at least like to see Kitty back on a team... How could they not want to fix up the loose ends about all these charcters before they go and rebuild expies of the old team?

to:

* After all my favorite characters die in Ultimatum, the three remaining X-men I like disappear off the face of the earth. What happened to Rouge? Or Iceman? Them still being teenagers and known mutants would have been interesting. And then theres Colossus the one I would have loved to see develop more but was reduced to brute rolls in later arcs should have at least gotten a mention in a series that is focusing on Wolverine's son, And with [[Spoiler:Nightcrawler [[spoiler:Nightcrawler and Jean-Paul both dying in Ultimatum]] I would have very much enjoyed seeing him cope and grow as a character and see how he will work without Banshee but they decide to make Kate or should I say [[spoiler:Jean]] the new leader to the new team of mutants. I would at least like to see Kitty back on a team... How could they not want to fix up the loose ends about all these charcters before they go and rebuild expies of the old team?
** Iceman lives with the Parkers now (as does the Human Torch). As for the rest of your argument, I can't disagree. There's quite a bit that needs to be answered.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**This. It really worries me when I got to the marvel wiki and it's easier to list supers that aren't dead than the ones who are.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None




to:

\n**I think the reason is more realistic versions of the characters. Which seems to mean that they are all dicks.

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* After all my favorite characters die in Ultimatum, the three remaining X-men I like disappear off the face of the earth. What happened to Rouge? Or Iceman? Them still being teenagers and known mutants would have been interesting. And then theres Colossus the one I would have loved to see develop more but was reduced to brute rolls in later arcs should have at least gotten a mention in a series that is focusing on Wolverine's son, And with [[Spoiler:Nightcrawler and Jean-Paul both dying in Ultimatum]] I would have very much enjoyed seeing him cope and grow as a character and see how he will work without Banshee but they decide to make Kate or should I say [[spoiler:Jean]] the new leader to the new team of mutants. I would at least like to see Kitty back on a team...

to:

* After all my favorite characters die in Ultimatum, the three remaining X-men I like disappear off the face of the earth. What happened to Rouge? Or Iceman? Them still being teenagers and known mutants would have been interesting. And then theres Colossus the one I would have loved to see develop more but was reduced to brute rolls in later arcs should have at least gotten a mention in a series that is focusing on Wolverine's son, And with [[Spoiler:Nightcrawler and Jean-Paul both dying in Ultimatum]] I would have very much enjoyed seeing him cope and grow as a character and see how he will work without Banshee but they decide to make Kate or should I say [[spoiler:Jean]] the new leader to the new team of mutants. I would at least like to see Kitty back on a team...
team... How could they not want to fix up the loose ends about all these charcters before they go and rebuild expies of the old team?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* After all my favorite characters die in Ultimatum, the three remaining X-men I like disappear off the face of the earth. What happened to Rouge? Or Iceman? Them still being teenagers and known mutants would have been interesting. And then theres Colossus the one I would have loved to see develop more but was reduced to brute rolls in later arcs should have at least gotten a mention in a series that is focusing on Wolverine's son, And with [[Spoiler:Nightcrawler and Jean-Paul both dying in Ultimatum]] I would have very much enjoyed seeing him cope and grow as a character and see how he will work without Banshee but they decide to make Kate or should I say [[spoiler:Jean]] the new leader to the new team of mutants. I would at least like to see Kitty back on a team...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** He's right though, I mean, Captain America is one of the strongest guys around, so I'm sure one old man is more than worth it to bring him down.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

***Fuck you.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* At this point, is anyone in S.H.I.E.L.D. left ALIVE? Talk about a redshirt army. They die more easily then a vampire in a pencil factory explosion. And god only knows what the deal is with Nick Fury at the moment.

to:

* At this point, is anyone in S.H.I.E.L.D. left ALIVE? Talk about a redshirt army. They die more easily then a vampire in a pencil factory explosion. And god God only knows what the deal is with Nick Fury at the moment.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

***To be fair it was implied the European intiative tech took billions of dollars, even then the America implemented their own (the season themed heroes). The suits only offer flight, durability and strength, while probably needing to be maintained extensively. Super soldier serum on the other hand if perfected could turn every soldier in the US into what Steve Rogers was, a genuine superhuman with super-strength, durability, endurance and most importantly increased tactical awareness (it was suggested it was part of the serum). All of this for cents.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** I'd read that.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** End of the world, my ass, since Magneto fixing the Earth's magnetic polarity with a ''blink'' apparently made everything instantly better weather-earthquake-tidal-wise within moments, and the recovery efforts are going better than they would have in any real disaster. Plain and simple, there was no reason for the ((Gorn)) other than bad attempts at shock value.

to:

*** End of the world, my ass, since Magneto fixing the Earth's magnetic polarity with a ''blink'' apparently made everything instantly better weather-earthquake-tidal-wise within moments, and the recovery efforts are going better than they would have in any real disaster. Plain and simple, there was no reason for the ((Gorn)) {{Gorn}} other than bad attempts at shock value.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
added new response & changed an old response of mine b/c it was too silly


** Actually the fact that the movie was so wildly successful pretty much proves that there was no need to change the origin. People liked the 616/movie origin just fine. The only "update" needed was to move it from Vietnam to the Middle East. Shazam, origin story successfully updated. Orson Scott Card basically changed Tony Stark's entire character. It would be like changing Spider-Man's origin to him being the biological child of Ben and May Parker but Ben Parker was really a super-intelligent spider-alien named Arachnion who was part of a group of spider-alien scientists trying to create a half-human/half-spider-alien hybrid and May was the unwilling test subject that they abducted and impregnated on their spaceship but Ben/Arachnion fell in love with May and realized the experiment was evil so they ran away together and when Peter was born they raised him like a normal boy until he hit puberty and his spider-alien DNA started emerging in the form of superpowers at which point the rest of the spider-aliens finally track down and kill Ben/Arachnion while Peter is at school but May hides in the cellar and when Peter gets home May tearfully confesses the whole thing to him and he spends a long time angsting about it before using his alien-spider-powers to hunt down and kill the spider-alien who murdered Ben/Arachnion but he saves the spider-alien's spaceship and uses it to create a suit of powered spider-armor and an arsenal of spider-gadgets that he uses to wage a never-ending battle against Manhattan crime and the alien spider-people just in case they ever come back to capture him. Does that sound like a necessary "update" to a superhero origin story? I think not.

to:

** Actually the fact that the movie was so wildly successful pretty much proves that there was no need to change the origin. People liked the 616/movie origin just fine. The only "update" needed was to move it from Vietnam to the Middle East. Shazam, origin story successfully updated. Orson Scott Card basically changed Tony Stark's entire character. It would be like changing Ultimate Spider-Man's origin to him being the biological child of Ben and May Parker but Ben Parker was really a super-intelligent spider-alien named Arachnion who was part of a group of spider-alien scientists trying to create a half-human/half-spider-alien hybrid and May was the unwilling test subject that they abducted and impregnated on their spaceship but Ben/Arachnion fell in love with May and realized the experiment was evil so they ran away together and dumb joke Spidey made after defeating Doc Ock when Peter was born they raised him like a normal boy until he hit puberty said he came from a planet where "man and his spider-alien DNA started emerging in the form of superpowers at which point the rest of the spider-aliens finally track down spider mate and kill Ben/Arachnion while Peter is at school but May hides live in the cellar and when Peter gets home May tearfully confesses the whole thing to him and he spends a long time angsting about it before using his alien-spider-powers to hunt down and kill the spider-alien who murdered Ben/Arachnion but he saves the spider-alien's spaceship and uses it to create a suit of powered spider-armor and an arsenal of spider-gadgets that he uses to wage a never-ending battle against Manhattan crime and the alien spider-people just in case they ever come back to capture him. Does that sound like a necessary "update" to a superhero origin story? I think not.harmony".







*** '''It contains more references to pop culture and politics.''' As of now, 616 titles have just as many references to pop culture and the like as UM does. Hell, look at Runaways. This troper first thought that Runaways was in the Ultimate Universe because of the dialogue, not to mention how the events of Secret War, Civil War, and such were portrayed as having such a (for lack of a better word) realistic effect on society. So just how in blue blazes is Ultimate Marvel more "realistic" than 616?


to:

\n*** ** '''It contains more references to pop culture and politics.''' As of now, 616 titles have just as many references to pop culture and the like as UM does. Hell, look at Runaways. This troper first thought that Runaways was in the Ultimate Universe because of the dialogue, not to mention how the events of Secret War, Civil War, and such were portrayed as having such a (for lack of a better word) realistic effect on society. So just how in blue blazes is Ultimate Marvel more "realistic" than 616?

616?
** I don't think there's anyone who still claims Ultimate Marvel is "more realistic". For any reason. Maybe it was at first, by a little bit. But even then it was splitting hairs. Doesn't matter how much they threw gods/magic out of the mix, it's still a series about people who can grow six stories tall, cling to walls, and shoot lasers out of their eyes. Just because you've dressed it up with Star Trek technobabble doesn't make it "realistic".

Added: 2029

Changed: 91

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Actually the fact that the movie was so wildly successful pretty much proves that there was no need to change the origin. People liked the 616/movie origin just fine. The only "update" needed was to move it from Vietnam to the Middle East. Shazam, origin story successfully updated. Orson Scott Card basically changed Tony Stark's entire character. It would be like changing Spider-Man's origin to him being the biological child of Ben and May Parker but Ben Parker was really a super-intelligent spider-alien named Arachnion who was part of a group of spider-alien scientists trying to create a half-human/half-spider-alien hybrid and May was the unwilling test subject that they abducted and impregnated on their spaceship but Ben/Arachnion fell in love with May and realized the experiment was evil so they ran away together and when Peter was born they raised him like a normal boy until he hit puberty and his spider-alien DNA started emerging in the form of superpowers at which point the rest of the spider-aliens finally track down and kill Ben/Arachnion while Peter is at school but May hides in the cellar and when Peter gets home May tearfully confesses the whole thing to him and he spends a long time angsting about it before using his alien-spider-powers to hunt down and kill the spider-alien who murdered Ben/Arachnion but he saves the spider-alien's spaceship and uses it to create a suit of powered spider-armor and an arsenal of spider-gadgets that he uses to wage a never-ending battle against Manhattan crime and the alien spider-people just in case they ever come back to capture him. Does that sound like a necessary "update" to a superhero origin story? I think not.



** The above troper aside, no, it's not just you. However, this troper recalls reading somewhere that Millar (or somebody working on Ultimates) felt that because modern superheroes would be basically celebrities they should act like modern celebrities. So making them impossible to relate to may have been an intentional deconstruction.




to:

** You'll have to be more specific. Has that oversight actually been an issue? If so, when?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* The big reveal in Ultimate Origins that [[spoiler: mutants were all the product of trying to recreate the super soldier serum]]. Even in the crazy world of comic book explanations that are full of FridgeLogic and truck-sized plot holes, they never bother to explain how the government managed to disseminate [[spoiler: the super soldier serum to every existing mutant across the globe in the Ultimate Universe]].

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Beast. "Oh my god, a bunch of stones fell on him, now he's dead." Much later. "He was only slightly squashed. Everyone be happy now."

to:

* Beast. "Oh my god, God, a bunch of stones fell on him, now he's dead." Much later. "He was only slightly squashed. Everyone be happy now."



* What they did to Hank Pym, Jeezus Chroist.

to:

* What they did to Hank Pym, Jeezus Chroist.Pym.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The movie origin ''is'' the 616 origin, more or less. I was only using it as shorthand.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** '''It doesn't mention/feature supernatural stuff like demons and sorcerers.''' I guess you could argue that as being intentional misdirection on Marvel's part what with the hints to Thor being a real god and such, but regardless it's more open about magic and other dimensions now than it was when it began.

to:

** '''It doesn't mention/feature supernatural stuff like demons and sorcerers.''' sorcerers''' I guess you could argue that as being intentional misdirection on Marvel's part what with the hints to Thor being a real god and such, but regardless it's more open about magic and other dimensions now than it was when it began.
began what with the Asgardians, Dormammu, Supreme Universe, etc.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** '''It doesn't mention/feature supernatural stuff like demons and sorcerers.'''-I guess you could argue that as being intentional misdirection on Marvel's part what with the hints to Thor being a real god and such, but regardless it's more open about magic and other dimensions now than it was when it began just like 616.

*** '''It contains more references to pop culture and politics and such.'''- As of now, 616 titles have just as many references to pop culture and the like as UM does. Hell, look at Runaways. This troper first thought that Runaways was in the Ultimate Universe because of the dialogue, not to mention how the events of Secret War, Civil War, and such were portrayed as having such a (for lack of a better word) realistic effect on society. So just how in blue blazes is Ultimate Marvel more "realistic" than 616?


to:

** '''It doesn't mention/feature supernatural stuff like demons and sorcerers.'''-I ''' I guess you could argue that as being intentional misdirection on Marvel's part what with the hints to Thor being a real god and such, but regardless it's more open about magic and other dimensions now than it was when it began just like 616.

began.

*** '''It contains more references to pop culture and politics and such.'''- politics.''' As of now, 616 titles have just as many references to pop culture and the like as UM does. Hell, look at Runaways. This troper first thought that Runaways was in the Ultimate Universe because of the dialogue, not to mention how the events of Secret War, Civil War, and such were portrayed as having such a (for lack of a better word) realistic effect on society. So just how in blue blazes is Ultimate Marvel more "realistic" than 616?

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** This has been bothering me for the longest. How is it that Ultimate Marvel is considered more "realistic" than the mainstream series? People usually seem to say it is because of two things:

1)<b>It doesn't mention/feature supernatural stuff like demons and sorcerers.</b>-I guess you could argue that as being intentional misdirection on Marvel's part what with the hints to Thor being a real god and such, but regardless it's more open about magic and other dimensions now than it was when it began just like 616.

2)<b>It contains more references to pop culture and politics and such.</b>- As of now, 616 titles have just as many references to pop culture and the like as UM does. Hell, look at Runaways. This troper first thought that Runaways was in the Ultimate Universe because of the dialogue, not to mention how the events of Secret War, Civil War, and such were portrayed as having such a (for lack of a better word) realistic effect on society. So just how in blue blazes is Ultimate Marvel more "realistic" than 616?


to:

** * This has been bothering me for the longest. How is it that Ultimate Marvel is considered more "realistic" than the mainstream series? People usually seem to say it is because of two things:

1)<b>It ** '''It doesn't mention/feature supernatural stuff like demons and sorcerers.</b>-I '''-I guess you could argue that as being intentional misdirection on Marvel's part what with the hints to Thor being a real god and such, but regardless it's more open about magic and other dimensions now than it was when it began just like 616.

2)<b>It *** '''It contains more references to pop culture and politics and such.</b>- '''- As of now, 616 titles have just as many references to pop culture and the like as UM does. Hell, look at Runaways. This troper first thought that Runaways was in the Ultimate Universe because of the dialogue, not to mention how the events of Secret War, Civil War, and such were portrayed as having such a (for lack of a better word) realistic effect on society. So just how in blue blazes is Ultimate Marvel more "realistic" than 616?

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


** This has been bothering me for the longest. How is it that Ultimate Marvel is considered more "realistic" than the mainstream series? People usually seem to say it is because of two things:

1)<b>It doesn't mention/feature supernatural stuff like demons and sorcerers.</b>-I guess you could argue that as being intentional misdirection on Marvel's part what with the hints to Thor being a real god and such, but regardless it's more open about magic and other dimensions now than it was when it began just like 616.

2)<b>It contains more references to pop culture and politics and such.</b>- As of now, 616 titles have just as many references to pop culture and the like as UM does. Hell, look at Runaways. This troper first thought that Runaways was in the Ultimate Universe because of the dialogue, not to mention how the events of Secret War, Civil War, and such were portrayed as having such a (for lack of a better word) realistic effect on society. So just how in blue blazes is Ultimate Marvel more "realistic" than 616?



Added DiffLines:

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Correct me if I'm wrong but this version of Spider-man hasn't matured yet so he isn't nowhere near as strong as the original. He did hurt his hands punching Kingpin who didn't even flinch. Also, Cap knocked out the Hulk in their first meating.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** That's what I liked about them. Then they got all PG. Ah well.
* For all the technological advances the Baxter Building has, they didn't have a 'turn shield on when huge mass is heading for us' sensor package. What?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Well, as I recall, the European captains could fly, and were seen in their appearance helping Iron Man at the bottom of the ocean. That explains how they got there ("fly" at top speed underwater)...but as to the time factor, no idea.

Added: 194

Changed: 2

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* At one point in the ULTIMATES, Captain America is suspected of murdering innocent civilians. Fine. So to arrest him, S.H.I.E.L.D. blows up half a WW2 cemetary. Not only that, they surprise and kidnap a WW2 veteran! Guess heart attacks just don't happen in the Ultimate Universe.

to:

* At one point in the ULTIMATES, Captain America is suspected of murdering innocent civilians. Fine. So to arrest him, S.H.I.E.L.D. blows up half a WW2 cemetary. cemetery. Not only that, they surprise and kidnap a WW2 veteran! Guess heart attacks just don't happen in the Ultimate Universe.Universe.
**Not that I really want to defend this stuff, but I feel I need to point something out: if Captain America went on a killing spree, I would say the life of a WWII vet is worth putting him down.

Top