Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / TheNostalgiaChick

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* It's starting to bug me that she constantly plays music in the background nowadays. Every now and then it can work for comedic effect, but when it's all the friggin' time it's just distracting. Like what was the point of playing "''Dancing Queen''" in the background during part of her review for "''the Man in the Iron Mask''"? If it was just for a gag then play it for five seconds and be done with it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
That\'s nothing to do with her and all to do with subjective tastes of humor.


* I don't really find her as laugh out loud funny as the Nostalgia Critic is.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* I don't really find her as laugh out loud funny as the Nostalgia Critic is.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


**** PRETENDING to be alluring?! She doesn't need to pretend!

to:

**** PRETENDING to be alluring?! She doesn't need to pretend!***** D: Oh God, seriously? When did you learn this? (And I thought it was a great, funny review so good on her for that.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

***** The MyLittlePony review was apparently made around the time when one of her students died, so that might explain it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


**** Fair point, thank you. And like I said, it was just a little bit of bother that I can't really give a good reason for and the overall joke was ridiculously awesome.

to:

**** Fair point, thank you. And like I said, it was just a little bit of bother that I can't really give a good reason for (I didn't find the "Rapping About Rape" video funny but the amount of idiots that called her a CompleteMonster for it was ridiculous and was far more than the twats that call Spoony sexist for "Spooning With Spoony 1") and the overall joke was ridiculously awesome.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**** Fair point, thank you. And like I said, it was just a little bit of bother that I can't really give a good reason for and the overall joke was ridiculously awesome.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** yes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**** Yeah, but the thing is, it wasn't a video ''about'' a rape joke, those were videos ''with'' a rape joke. It was just a joke about how many people online started freaking out over it. Much like their comment on it caused this.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** The Top Ten Disturbing And Inescapable Christmas Songs countdown had the sexual predator guy roofying her, the Enchanted Christmas review had her making a CreepyUncle joke and she has a RunningGag of thrusting her hips every time there's a rape implication, like in ''{{Mulan}}'' and ''EarthGirlsAreEasy''. And as far as I know, they were considered funny by the majority and had no backlash whatsoever.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**She made any other RapeAsComedy jokes?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Was anyone else a little bit bothered by the whole "We're not Spoony, we can't get away with it!" crack when they were talking about the Rapping About Rape controversy? It's a little unfair to blame the reaction on DoubleStandards, seeing as her usual RapeAsComedy jokes are widely loved. [[hottip:*: And as an aside, she and Doug came up with the idea of "Spooning With Spoony", episodes one and two respectively.]]

Added: 63

Changed: 560

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** So it's an [[AllegedlyFreeGame AllegedlyFreeWebsite]]?

to:

** So it's an [[AllegedlyFreeGame AllegedlyFreeWebsite]]?Allegedly Free Website]]?



*** Yeah, but TvTropes uses "trope" in a sense (which IIRC the Chick used) different from the academical one.

to:

*** Yeah, but TvTropes TVTropes uses "trope" in a sense (which IIRC the Chick used) different from the academical one.



** Anyway, she's namely mentioned TVtropes now in "Ever After".
* It just bugs me, well, that the NostalgiaChick isn't really reviewing Nostalgic movies so much right now. I mean, yeah, I get that there is a ''point'' to what she says, but at the same time, I started looking at what she did because I was hoping that there would be a female point of view for certain movies. (Like TheSwanPrincess- I would ''love'' to see a review of that!) Instead, we get videos on the female:male ratio, and Disney Princess (just in general). I mean, I ''get'' that's she done a lot of reviews, and that's awesome, I guess... I just wish she'd do ''movie'' reviews instead of talking about gender (in)equality in kids cartoons... Am I nuts?
** That bugs this troper a little as well, but she lets it pass for two reasons: The first is that the Chick is enrolled in a Master's degree program at USC which is apparently taking up a lot of her time, thus not leaving her with as much time to think up reviews. The second is that with the Smurfette Principle at least, there was a pretty good reason for her to apply it to Nostalgia cartoons (as she put it, she herself was basically the knock-off female counterpart to the Critic). I also suspect that she did so many Disney cartoons at that time because ''ThePrincessAndTheFrog'' was coming out and thus a lot of people were talking about Disney princess movies. On a final note, this troper would also love to see ''TheSwanPrincess'' reviewed.

to:

** Anyway, she's namely mentioned TVtropes TV Tropes by name now in "Ever After".
her review of ''Film/EverAfter''.
* It just bugs me, well, that the NostalgiaChick isn't really reviewing Nostalgic nostalgic movies so much right now. I mean, yeah, I get that there is a ''point'' to what she says, but at the same time, I started looking at what she did because I was hoping that there would be a female point of view for certain movies. (Like TheSwanPrincess- ''TheSwanPrincess'' - I would ''love'' to see a review of that!) Instead, we get videos on the female:male ratio, and Disney Princess Princesses (just in general). I mean, I ''get'' that's she done a lot of reviews, and that's awesome, I guess... I just wish she'd do ''movie'' reviews instead of talking about gender (in)equality in kids kids' cartoons... Am I nuts?
** That bugs this troper a little as well, but she lets it pass for two reasons: The first is that the Chick is enrolled in a Master's degree program at USC which is apparently taking up a lot of her time, thus not leaving her with as much time to think up reviews. The second is that with the Smurfette Principle SmurfettePrinciple at least, there was a pretty good reason for her to apply it to Nostalgia cartoons (as she put it, she herself was basically the knock-off female counterpart to the Critic). I also suspect that she did so many Disney cartoons at that time because ''ThePrincessAndTheFrog'' was coming out and thus a lot of people were talking about Disney princess movies. On a final note, this troper would also love to see ''TheSwanPrincess'' reviewed.



** Her My Little Pony review seemed sort of aimless, she seemed uninterested, looked tired, and mostly just discussed the brand in general instead of actually review anything, maybe trying to make videos so close to finals is getting to her?

to:

** Her My Little Pony MyLittlePony review seemed sort of aimless, she seemed uninterested, looked tired, and mostly just discussed the brand in general instead of actually review anything, maybe trying to make videos so close to finals is getting to her?



** Fact is, that the SmurfettePrinciple and reviews on princesses in general ''does'' count as a female viewpoint, because quite frankly, all these stereotypes an injustices are things that most women pick up on in their lifetime, often in their childhood before gender roles start to set. Quite frankly, if the whole section was to be reviews made without any reflection on why the market is divided into mainstream and "girls" and everything that goes with it, it might as well be the Nostallgia Critic himself doing it. The gender perspective is not only part if Nostalgia Chick's niche, it's an all too often ignored viewpoint of many a woman.
* Did Lindsay watch All Dogs Go to Heaven before the Ferngully review? The original BigLippedAlligatorMoment ISN'T a BigLippedAlligatorMoment! The Alligator carries the main characters home, if that doesn't advance the plot, I don't know what does...

to:

** Fact is, that the SmurfettePrinciple and reviews on princesses in general ''does'' count as a female viewpoint, because quite frankly, all these stereotypes an injustices are things that most women pick up on in their lifetime, often in their childhood before gender roles start to set. Quite frankly, if the whole section was to be reviews made without any reflection on why the market is divided into mainstream and "girls" and everything that goes with it, it might as well be the Nostallgia Nostalgia Critic himself doing it. The gender perspective is not only part if of Nostalgia Chick's niche, it's an all too often ignored viewpoint of many a woman.
* Did Lindsay watch All ''All Dogs Go to Heaven Heaven'' before the Ferngully review? The original BigLippedAlligatorMoment ISN'T a BigLippedAlligatorMoment! The Alligator carries the main characters home, if that doesn't advance the plot, I don't know what does...



*** Here's how this troper sees it: it's like the belowmentioned death of Screweyes thing. It's not a BLAM that King Gator is introduced, it's the fact that he launches into a full-blown water-ballet number for absolutely no reason. It's also worth mentioning that the Chick said that a BLAM has ''little'' to no relation to the plot, not "none at all". Splitting hairs yes, but still...
** The Alligator shows up again and rescues Charlie at the end. He's apparently also responsible for the antagonist Carface being in the afterlife at the very end, since he's last seen licking his lips and chasing after him...I'd say that he's pretty integral to the plot resolution myself. The point of the musical number, as far as I could see, was to set-up his reason for feeling so protective of Charlie in the first place...he enjoyed "making music" with him. Slightly rickety plotting if you ask me, but hardly a BLAM (and certainly no more so than any other song and dance number in any other animated musical). Oh well, it's too late now - the name's stuck.
** Also, in We're Back, how is Professor Screweyes dying a BigLippedAlligatorMoment? The main antagonist of the movie is killed! How does that not advance the plot?

to:

*** Here's how this troper sees it: it's like the belowmentioned below-mentioned death of Screweyes thing. It's not a BLAM that King Gator is introduced, it's the fact that he launches into a full-blown water-ballet number for absolutely no reason. It's also worth mentioning that the Chick said that a BLAM has ''little'' to no relation to the plot, not "none at all". Splitting hairs yes, but still...
** The Alligator shows up again and rescues Charlie at the end. He's apparently also responsible for the antagonist Carface being in the afterlife at the very end, since he's last seen licking his lips and chasing after him...I'd say that he's pretty integral to the plot resolution myself. The point of the musical number, as far as I could see, was to set-up set up his reason for feeling so protective of Charlie in the first place...he enjoyed "making music" with him. Slightly rickety plotting if you ask me, but hardly a BLAM (and certainly no more so than any other song and dance number in any other animated musical). Oh well, it's too late now - the name's stuck.
** Also, in We're Back, ''We're Back'', how is Professor Screweyes dying a BigLippedAlligatorMoment? The main antagonist of the movie is killed! How does that not advance the plot?



**** Rumour? And besides, the last time Doug used it was a bored variant in his Flubber review, which was only a month or so ago.
* Why is it that, when the NC makes a joke about autism, there's an uproar, yet when the Nostalgia Chick says VERY CLEARLY in her Enchanted Christmas review "I'm going to throw an autistic temper tantrum!" [[DoubleStandard no one says anything about it?]]. Is it just that she's a "hot woman" again?

to:

**** Rumour? And besides, the last time Doug used it was a bored variant in his Flubber ''Flubber'' review, which was only a month or so ago.
* Why is it that, when the NC makes a joke about autism, there's an uproar, yet when the Nostalgia Chick says VERY CLEARLY in her Enchanted Christmas ''Enchanted Christmas'' review "I'm going to throw an autistic temper tantrum!" [[DoubleStandard no one says anything about it?]]. Is it just that she's a "hot woman" again?



** There's an uproar? really? All this troper saw was "LOL @ AUTISM" because Autistics are still Highly AcceptableTargets.

to:

** There's an uproar? really? All this troper saw was "LOL @ AUTISM" because Autistics are still Highly AcceptableTargets.{{Acceptable Target}}s.



* The Nostalgia Chick's video Ever After. It seemed unsure of itself, she didn't particularly review any one movie with much detail, it didn't seem to analyze Cinderella remakes so much just give examples of them, and the use of Nella seemed gratuitous and not very relevant to anything in particular besides dresses. Her reviews seem to be getting more and more vague, I miss her giving straightforward reviews like with Showgirls.
** You say that like it's been years since Showgirls. It was two reviews ago. And watching the actual review, it seems like the problem is that it shouldn't have been labeled as an Ever After review. Like Blonde Girls and Disney Princesses, it should have simply been advertised as an analysis of the Cinderella story rather than any one retelling of it. And at this point, BFF Nella is basically fanservice. She's awesome.
*** But Nella didn't even do anything in that video. She just sort of stood around in a dress trying to be funny with nothing to go on. And I don't have problem with her analysis videos, but this one just felt weak. She didn't really discuss or deconstruct or bring anything profound to the table, it felt more like "Here's some clips of Enchanted. Here's some clips of Cinderella. LOL this song is weird. h, that was only three minutes? Here's some clips of Nella for padding." It was just sub-par.
**** In her review of Grease the Nostalgia Chick said at the end that she needed to raise money for her thesis. Also, in Film Brain's commentary for ''Kickassia'', it was said that the Nostalgia Chick spent every bit of free time that she had working on a paper for college. If she has indeed been that busy [[Tropers/{{loracarol}} I]] could ''totally'' see why her videos might be considered "subpar"- she's still putting them out for us, though, and for that I'm grateful.
**** Seconded. This troper actually enjoyed the Ever After review personally, if only because it was refreshing to see someone acknowledge the UnfortunateImplications and WallBangers those stories have while at the same time pointing out the good and enjoyable qualities they possess. Most people seem to swing one way or the other.
* How in the heck is Enchanted a Cinderella retelling?

to:

* The Nostalgia Chick's video Ever After.for ''Film/EverAfter''. It seemed unsure of itself, she didn't particularly review any one movie with much detail, it didn't seem to analyze Cinderella remakes so much just give examples of them, and the use of Nella seemed gratuitous and not very relevant to anything in particular besides dresses. Her reviews seem to be getting more and more vague, I miss her giving straightforward reviews like with Showgirls.
''Showgirls''.
** You say that like it's been years since Showgirls.''Showgirls''. It was two reviews ago. And watching the actual review, it seems like the problem is that it shouldn't have been labeled as an Ever After ''Ever After'' review. Like Blonde Girls and Disney Princesses, it should have simply been advertised as an analysis of the Cinderella story rather than any one retelling of it. And at this point, BFF Nella is basically fanservice. She's awesome.
*** But Nella didn't even do anything in that video. She just sort of stood around in a dress trying to be funny with nothing to go on. And I don't have problem with her analysis videos, but this one just felt weak. She didn't really discuss or deconstruct or bring anything profound to the table, it felt more like "Here's some clips of Enchanted. ''Enchanted''. Here's some clips of Cinderella.''Cinderella''. LOL this song is weird. h, Oh, that was only three minutes? Here's some clips of Nella for padding." It was just sub-par.
**** In her review of Grease ''{{Grease}}'' the Nostalgia Chick said at the end that she needed to raise money for her thesis. Also, in Film Brain's commentary for ''Kickassia'', it was said that the Nostalgia Chick spent every bit of free time that she had working on a paper for college. If she has indeed been that busy busy, [[Tropers/{{loracarol}} I]] could ''totally'' see why her videos might be considered "subpar"- "subpar" - she's still putting them out for us, though, and for that I'm grateful.
**** Seconded. This troper actually enjoyed the Ever After ''Ever After'' review personally, if only because it was refreshing to see someone acknowledge the UnfortunateImplications and WallBangers those stories have while at the same time pointing out the good and enjoyable qualities they possess. Most people seem to swing one way or the other.
**** Thank you for pointing out that she was working on a paper for college during the making of ''{{Kickassia}}''. I haven't seen Film Brain's entire commentary yet, but that clears up my one and only IJBM about the film -- the fact that the Nostalgia Chick seemed very colorless and drained throughout most of it. If she was that busy with schoolwork, though, it makes perfect sense.
* How in the heck is Enchanted ''Enchanted'' a Cinderella retelling?



** Probably a bit of personal appeal for Lindsy. She mentioned in a previous review how she liked Enchanted and thought it was underrated. She probably just figured it could fit in and wanted to talk about its interesting take on fairy tale relationships in the real world.
* Nostalgia Chick's reaction to the end of {{Mulan}} just bugs me. Here we have a probably 16/17(if not younger) year old girl who just fought in a war that doesn't allow women, defeated the BigBad, "regained" her families honor, and now she wants to go home. What's wrong with that? I mean- RealWomenNeverWearDresses much?
** Tbh, I was more bothered about her aside comment on BuffyTheVampireSlayer at the end of her She Ra review, about how the feminism is countered by Buffy's name. I might be wrong, she might love the series, but that threw me off a bit.
** In the Ever After review, it seemed that the Chick was more peeved that Mulan opted to go off and get married rather than take a position of wealth and influence by the Emperor. Of course, she also states in the same review that opinions on things like that basically boiled down to a person's viewpoint on the matter. For the record, the Chick said that she really likes ''Enchanted'' and ''Beauty and the Beast'', both of which have heroines that act pretty feminine and ultimately get married as their happy endings, so it's hard to say on her views of that particular trope.
*** My beef with that though is that Mulan ''doesn't'' go home to get married. She just decides to go home. Then the guy follows her there, but the movie doesn't end with them necessarily starting up a relationship. Just him staying for dinner. Yeah the sequel added the whole marriage thing, but it wasn't made by the same people and is considered non-canon by like 95% of Disney fans. Can't really judge the movie's ending based on what a lesser sequel decided happened next.

to:

** Probably a bit of personal appeal for Lindsy.Lindsay. She mentioned in a previous review how she liked Enchanted and thought it was underrated. She probably just figured it could fit in and wanted to talk about its interesting take on fairy tale relationships in the real world.
* Nostalgia Chick's reaction to the end of {{Mulan}} ''{{Mulan}}'' just bugs me. Here we have a probably 16/17(if not younger) year old girl who just fought in a war that doesn't allow women, defeated the BigBad, "regained" her families family's honor, and now she wants to go home. What's wrong with that? I mean- mean - RealWomenNeverWearDresses much?
** Tbh, I was more bothered about her aside comment on BuffyTheVampireSlayer at the end of her She Ra She-Ra review, about how the feminism is countered by Buffy's name. I might be wrong, she might love the series, but that threw me off a bit.
** In the Ever After ''Ever After'' review, it seemed that the Chick was more peeved that Mulan ''Mulan'' opted to go off and get married rather than take a position of wealth and influence by the Emperor. Of course, she also states in the same review that opinions on things like that basically boiled down to a person's viewpoint on the matter. For the record, the Chick said that she really likes ''Enchanted'' and ''Beauty and the Beast'', both of which have heroines that act pretty feminine and ultimately get married as their happy endings, so it's hard to say on her views of that particular trope.
*** My beef with that though is that Mulan ''doesn't'' go home to get married. She just decides to go home. Then the guy follows her there, but the movie doesn't end with them necessarily starting up a relationship. Just him staying for dinner. Yeah Yeah, the sequel added the whole marriage thing, but it wasn't made by the same people and is considered non-canon by like 95% of Disney fans. Can't really judge the movie's ending based on what a lesser sequel decided happened next.



*** It might be the fact that the ending of her turning down political influence and a shot at becoming something important in order to run off and be a normal housewife was a little too close to the ending of Anastasia, which also seriously irked Lindsay, only Anastasia blatantly left for a boy.

to:

*** It might be the fact that the ending of her turning down political influence and a shot at becoming something important in order to run off and be a normal housewife was a little too close to the ending of Anastasia, ''Anastasia'', which also seriously irked Lindsay, only Anastasia blatantly left for a boy.



** Except for when she went into detail about how the music didn't seem right. Wild sassy gospel choir music and roman myth she said were too unrelated to eachother to really make sense. And she did go into detail about how Meg is a complex character and her relation with Hades is interesting and almost like a sassy friendship. She also talked about how Hades seemed to go by his word moreso than Hercules did, and discussed how Hercules is an incredibly bland character. And what do you mean by "the movie does not revolve around the plot"? What else is a movie supposed to follow, besides the ''plot''?
* While I did find her skit about rules every MadScientist should follow to be pretty entertaining. I couldn't help but be [[IncrediblyLamePun bugged]] by the fact that she utterly ''missed'' the MostTriumphantExample of "Don't put your dick in it". Four words, people-[[RockyHorrorPictureShow Rocky. Horror. Picture. Show.]] I mean, the whole conflict of the movie was due to the fact that Frank (disguised as Brad) screwed Janet, Frank (now disguised as Janet) screwed Brad, Janet sees Brad and Frank together on a monitor, Janet feels betrayed and has sex with Rocky out of spite...Frank finds out and gets insanely jealous, and, well, you see where this is going. Plus, it doesn't help that Rocky was pretty much created for no other purpose other than for someone for Frank to fuck to his heart's content and that Rocky has no self-control of his libido...So why would Lindsay NOT include this as an example of "Don't put your dick in it"?

to:

** Except for when she went into detail about how the music didn't seem right. Wild sassy gospel choir music and roman Greek/Roman myth she said were too unrelated to eachother each other to really make sense. And she did go into detail about how Meg is a complex character and her relation relationship with Hades is interesting and almost like a sassy friendship. She also talked about how Hades seemed to go by his word moreso than Hercules did, and discussed how Hercules is an incredibly bland character. And what do you mean by "the movie does not revolve around the plot"? What else is a movie supposed to follow, besides the ''plot''?
* While I did find her skit about rules every MadScientist should follow to be pretty entertaining. entertaining, I couldn't help but be [[IncrediblyLamePun bugged]] by the fact that she utterly ''missed'' the MostTriumphantExample of "Don't put your dick in it". Four words, people-[[RockyHorrorPictureShow Rocky. Horror. Picture. Show.]] I mean, the whole conflict of the movie was due to the fact that Frank (disguised as Brad) screwed Janet, Frank (now disguised as Janet) screwed Brad, Janet sees Brad and Frank together on a monitor, Janet feels betrayed and has sex with Rocky out of spite...Frank finds out and gets insanely jealous, and, well, you see where this is going. Plus, it doesn't help that Rocky was pretty much created for no other purpose other than for someone for Frank to fuck to his heart's content and that Rocky has no self-control of his libido...So why would Lindsay NOT include this as an example of "Don't put your dick in it"?



* I'm just sorta curious if anyone else noticed this - I don't watch her reviews too often, only I saw a few of them recently and noticed something. Does anyone else think she kind of imitates [[RedLetterMedia Mr. Plinkett]] at times? Her question to Hades - 'Why do you have that? Hey I asked you a question - why do you have that?' And a few others instances I can't remember too well - interestingly enough, it almost sounds like she's been watching Plinkett, did anyone else happen to think so? (I assume as a part of the reviewer community, she's familiar with RLM)
* Nella in the Grease review just bugs me. You really couldn't consider me much of a fan of her character to begin with, but that review is when I finally just couldn't take her any more. Nearly every time she appears it's just "grr, I'm ambiguously nerdy and angry a lot" and... that's it. If she does anything else, her delivery is so flat, and whatever she's involved in is barely even tangentially related to the review. I don't think it's even entirely her fualt, the Nella sequences are just a horrible idea and she's given a completely flat character to try to do something with them. The fact that she's in nearly every video now has more or less made The Chick unwatchable.
** YourMileageMayVary. She's in videos a lot because she's popular with a lot of the fans. Some dislike her some don't. Taste in humor is, as it turns out, a matter of personal taste.

to:

* I'm just sorta curious if anyone else noticed this - I don't watch her reviews too often, only I saw a few of them recently and noticed something. Does anyone else think she kind of imitates [[RedLetterMedia Mr. Plinkett]] at times? Her question to Hades - 'Why do you have that? Hey I asked you a question - why do you have that?' And a few others instances I can't remember too well - interestingly enough, it almost sounds like she's been watching Plinkett, did anyone else happen to think so? (I assume as a part of the reviewer community, she's familiar with RLM)
RLM.)
* Nella in the Grease ''Grease'' review just bugs me. You really couldn't consider me much of a fan of her character to begin with, but that review is when I finally just couldn't take her any more. Nearly every time she appears it's just "grr, I'm ambiguously nerdy and angry a lot" and... that's it. If she does anything else, her delivery is so flat, and whatever she's involved in is barely even tangentially related to the review. I don't think it's even entirely her fualt, the Nella sequences are just a horrible idea and she's given a completely flat character to try to do something with them. The fact that she's in nearly every video now has more or less made The Chick unwatchable.
** YourMileageMayVary. She's in videos a lot because she's popular with a lot of the fans. Some dislike her her, some don't. Taste in humor is, as it turns out, a matter of personal taste.taste.
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
We're not talking about Ella Enchanted we are talking about Enchanted


** Ella Enchanted (the movie) is based off a book of the same name. If you read the book, then it becomes very clear how it's a Cinderella retelling.

Added: 323

Changed: 353

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Nostalgia Chick's reaction to the end of {{Mulan}} just bugs me. Here we have a probably 16/17(if not younger) year old girl who just fought in a war that doesn't allow women, defeated the BigBad, "regained" her families honor, and now she wants to go home. What's wrong with that? I mean- RealWomenNeverWearDresses much?

to:

* ** Ella Enchanted (the movie) is based off a book of the same name. If you read the book, then it becomes very clear how it's a Cinderella retelling.
*
Nostalgia Chick's reaction to the end of {{Mulan}} just bugs me. Here we have a probably 16/17(if not younger) year old girl who just fought in a war that doesn't allow women, defeated the BigBad, "regained" her families honor, and now she wants to go home. What's wrong with that? I mean- RealWomenNeverWearDresses much?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Nella in the Grease review just bugs me. You really couldn't consider me much of a fan of her character to begin with, but that review is when I finally just couldn't take her any more. Nearly every time she appears it's just "grr, I'm ambiguously nerdy and angry a lot" and... that's it. If she does anything else, her delivery is so flat, and whatever she's involved in is barely even tangentially related to the review. I don't think it's even entirely her fualt, the Nella sequences are just a horrible idea and she's given a completely flat character to try to do something with them. The fact that she's in nearly every video now has more or less made The Chick unwatchable.

to:

* Nella in the Grease review just bugs me. You really couldn't consider me much of a fan of her character to begin with, but that review is when I finally just couldn't take her any more. Nearly every time she appears it's just "grr, I'm ambiguously nerdy and angry a lot" and... that's it. If she does anything else, her delivery is so flat, and whatever she's involved in is barely even tangentially related to the review. I don't think it's even entirely her fualt, the Nella sequences are just a horrible idea and she's given a completely flat character to try to do something with them. The fact that she's in nearly every video now has more or less made The Chick unwatchable.unwatchable.
** YourMileageMayVary. She's in videos a lot because she's popular with a lot of the fans. Some dislike her some don't. Taste in humor is, as it turns out, a matter of personal taste.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* I'm just sorta curious if anyone else noticed this - I don't watch her reviews too often, only I saw a few of them recently and noticed something. Does anyone else think she kind of imitates [[RedLetterMedia Mr. Plinkett]] at times? Her question to Hades - 'Why do you have that? Hey I asked you a question - why do you have that?' And a few others instances I can't remember too well - interestingly enough, it almost sounds like she's been watching Plinkett, did anyone else happen to think so? (I assume as a part of the reviewer community, she's familiar with RLM)

to:

* I'm just sorta curious if anyone else noticed this - I don't watch her reviews too often, only I saw a few of them recently and noticed something. Does anyone else think she kind of imitates [[RedLetterMedia Mr. Plinkett]] at times? Her question to Hades - 'Why do you have that? Hey I asked you a question - why do you have that?' And a few others instances I can't remember too well - interestingly enough, it almost sounds like she's been watching Plinkett, did anyone else happen to think so? (I assume as a part of the reviewer community, she's familiar with RLM)RLM)
* Nella in the Grease review just bugs me. You really couldn't consider me much of a fan of her character to begin with, but that review is when I finally just couldn't take her any more. Nearly every time she appears it's just "grr, I'm ambiguously nerdy and angry a lot" and... that's it. If she does anything else, her delivery is so flat, and whatever she's involved in is barely even tangentially related to the review. I don't think it's even entirely her fualt, the Nella sequences are just a horrible idea and she's given a completely flat character to try to do something with them. The fact that she's in nearly every video now has more or less made The Chick unwatchable.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Tbh, I was more bothered about her aside comment on BuffyTheVampireSlayer at the end of her She Ra review, about how the feminism is countered by Buffy's name. I might be wrong, she might love the series, but that threw me off a bit.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Mulan turns down an offer for a prestigious job working directly for the Emperor of China, choosing to value family over a job opportunity. Whether she leaves a job to be with a husband or her father, that's the same trope: FemaleSuccessIsFamily. If that bugs The Nostalgia Chick, then it bothers The Nostalgia Chick.

Added: 132

Changed: 1

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Maybe more people take the subject personally. This is a shot in the dark, but there are probably be more people online who have friends with disabilities like mild Autism or ADD than, say, Parkinson's diseas, or more rare/severe things. (Which does not make the double standard right, of course.)

to:

*** Maybe more people take the subject personally. This is a shot in the dark, but there are probably be more people online who have friends with disabilities like mild Autism or ADD than, say, Parkinson's diseas, disease, or more rare/severe things. (Which does not make the double standard right, of course.) )
** Forge the autism comment, this troper is just shocked that "This thing is worse than seven Holocausts!" went without comment. O_o
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Probably because Rocky Horror is more of a comedy than straight sci-fi. Also, she had plenty of other examples to choose from.

to:

** Probably because Rocky Horror is more of a comedy than straight sci-fi. Also, she had plenty of other examples to choose from.from.
* I'm just sorta curious if anyone else noticed this - I don't watch her reviews too often, only I saw a few of them recently and noticed something. Does anyone else think she kind of imitates [[RedLetterMedia Mr. Plinkett]] at times? Her question to Hades - 'Why do you have that? Hey I asked you a question - why do you have that?' And a few others instances I can't remember too well - interestingly enough, it almost sounds like she's been watching Plinkett, did anyone else happen to think so? (I assume as a part of the reviewer community, she's familiar with RLM)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* While I did find her skit about rules every MadScientist should follow to be pretty entertaining. I couldn't help but be [[IncrediblyLamePun bugged]] by the fact that she utterly ''missed'' the MostTriumphantExample of "Don't put your dick in it". Four words, people-[[RockyHorrorPictureShow Rocky. Horror. Picture. Show.]] I mean, the whole conflict of the movie was due to the fact that Frank (disguised as Brad) screwed Janet, Frank (now disguised as Janet) screwed Brad, Janet sees Brad and Frank together on a monitor, Janet feels betrayed and has sex with Rocky out of spite...Frank finds out and gets insanely jealous, and, well, you see where this is going. Plus, it doesn't help that Rocky was pretty much created for no other purpose other than for someone for Frank to fuck to his heart's content and that Rocky has no self-control of his libido...So why would Lindsay NOT include this as an example of "Don't put your dick in it"?

to:

* While I did find her skit about rules every MadScientist should follow to be pretty entertaining. I couldn't help but be [[IncrediblyLamePun bugged]] by the fact that she utterly ''missed'' the MostTriumphantExample of "Don't put your dick in it". Four words, people-[[RockyHorrorPictureShow Rocky. Horror. Picture. Show.]] I mean, the whole conflict of the movie was due to the fact that Frank (disguised as Brad) screwed Janet, Frank (now disguised as Janet) screwed Brad, Janet sees Brad and Frank together on a monitor, Janet feels betrayed and has sex with Rocky out of spite...Frank finds out and gets insanely jealous, and, well, you see where this is going. Plus, it doesn't help that Rocky was pretty much created for no other purpose other than for someone for Frank to fuck to his heart's content and that Rocky has no self-control of his libido...So why would Lindsay NOT include this as an example of "Don't put your dick in it"?it"?
** Probably because Rocky Horror is more of a comedy than straight sci-fi. Also, she had plenty of other examples to choose from.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Except for when she went into detail about how the music didn't seem right. Wild sassy gospel choir music and roman myth she said were too unrelated to eachother to really make sense. And she did go into detail about how Meg is a complex character and her relation with Hades is interesting and almost like a sassy friendship. She also talked about how Hades seemed to go by his word moreso than Hercules did, and discussed how Hercules is an incredibly bland character. And what do you mean by "the movie does not revolve around the plot"? What else is a movie supposed to follow, besides the ''plot''?

to:

** Except for when she went into detail about how the music didn't seem right. Wild sassy gospel choir music and roman myth she said were too unrelated to eachother to really make sense. And she did go into detail about how Meg is a complex character and her relation with Hades is interesting and almost like a sassy friendship. She also talked about how Hades seemed to go by his word moreso than Hercules did, and discussed how Hercules is an incredibly bland character. And what do you mean by "the movie does not revolve around the plot"? What else is a movie supposed to follow, besides the ''plot''?''plot''?
* While I did find her skit about rules every MadScientist should follow to be pretty entertaining. I couldn't help but be [[IncrediblyLamePun bugged]] by the fact that she utterly ''missed'' the MostTriumphantExample of "Don't put your dick in it". Four words, people-[[RockyHorrorPictureShow Rocky. Horror. Picture. Show.]] I mean, the whole conflict of the movie was due to the fact that Frank (disguised as Brad) screwed Janet, Frank (now disguised as Janet) screwed Brad, Janet sees Brad and Frank together on a monitor, Janet feels betrayed and has sex with Rocky out of spite...Frank finds out and gets insanely jealous, and, well, you see where this is going. Plus, it doesn't help that Rocky was pretty much created for no other purpose other than for someone for Frank to fuck to his heart's content and that Rocky has no self-control of his libido...So why would Lindsay NOT include this as an example of "Don't put your dick in it"?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** IIRC, there is a deleted scene that can be found in which Screweyes explains his history with crows and how not only did they eat his original eye, but he keeps them around to keep himself in a constant state of fear, going on his whole fear circus routine.

to:

** *** IIRC, there is a deleted scene that can be found in which Screweyes explains his history with crows and how not only did they eat his original eye, but he keeps them around to keep himself in a constant state of fear, going on his whole fear circus routine.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
additional information

Added DiffLines:

** IIRC, there is a deleted scene that can be found in which Screweyes explains his history with crows and how not only did they eat his original eye, but he keeps them around to keep himself in a constant state of fear, going on his whole fear circus routine.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
The smiley face thing is annoying.


**** In her review of Grease the Nostalgia Chick said at the end that she needed to raise money for her thesis. Also, in Film Brain's commentary for ''Kickassia'', it was said that the Nostalgia Chick spent every bit of free time that she had working on a paper for college. If she has indeed been that busy [[Tropers/{{loracarol}} I]] could ''totally'' see why her videos might be considered "subpar"- she's still putting them out for us, though, and for that I'm grateful. ^_~

to:

**** In her review of Grease the Nostalgia Chick said at the end that she needed to raise money for her thesis. Also, in Film Brain's commentary for ''Kickassia'', it was said that the Nostalgia Chick spent every bit of free time that she had working on a paper for college. If she has indeed been that busy [[Tropers/{{loracarol}} I]] could ''totally'' see why her videos might be considered "subpar"- she's still putting them out for us, though, and for that I'm grateful. ^_~
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Probably a bit of personal appeal for Lindsy. She mentioned in a previous review how she liked Enchanted and thought it was underrated. She probably just figured it could fit in and wanted to talk about its interesting take on fairy tale relationships in the real world.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Fact is, that the SmurfettePrinciple and reviews on princesses in general ''does'' count as a female viewpoint, because quite frankly, all these stereotypes an injustices are things that most women pick up on in their lifetime, often in their childhood before gender roles start to set. Quite frankly, if the whole section was to be reviews made without any reflection on why the market is divided into mainstream and "girls" and everything that goes with it, it might as well be the Nostallgia Critic himself doing it. The gender perspective is not only part if Nostalgia Chick's niche, it's an all too often ignored viewpoint of many a woman.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Maybe more people take the subject personally. This is a shot in the dark, but there are probably be more people online who have friends with disabilities like mild Autism or ADD than, say, Parkinson's diseas, or more rare/severe things. (Which does not make the double standard right, of course.)

Added: 15330

Changed: 140

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Click the edit button to start this new page.

to:

Click * Nostalgia Chick. In her ''TheSmurfettePrinciple'' video she had three references to Tropes, she even said "trope". Is she a troper?
** Apparently. Someone said as much somewhere else on
the edit button wiki; they spoke authoritatively and didn't have a username, so it was probably her. Claims she was a troper before she was the Chick.
** I'm guessing "reads the wiki entries" doesn't necessarily mean "a Troper". Sorry. Pedant.
** In his commentary on the FernGully review, Doug says they made such a big deal out of the BigLippedAlligatorMoment because Lindsay really wanted the phrase
to start catch on, and she was really happy when "it started being used by [=TV=] Quick website or something." I think that's us.
** Where's
this Ferngully commentary that you speak of?
** It's in the Premium Area, that you get access to by donating your first born son.
** So it's an [[AllegedlyFreeGame AllegedlyFreeWebsite]]?
*** No. You don't have to pay for the majority of content, nor does this give you anything more than one person's rambling thoughts on an already-existing episode.
** Um, [[TVTropes we]] didn't invent the word "trope", you know. The Ancient Greeks used it.
*** Yeah, but TvTropes uses "trope" in a sense (which IIRC the Chick used) different from the academical one.
*** Different how?
**** For the sake of not pasting a bunch of crap here and cluttering the article, [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trope_%28literature%29 here's]] the ThatOtherWiki article on the usage of "trope" that's closest to how TVTropes uses it. Its meaning is closer to "figure of speech" in academia. Our usage gets a one-line throwaway sentence: "In modern usage, "trope" often means "a common or overused theme or device: cliché."
**** TV Tropes still didn't create the TV Tropes definition of tropes, did it?
** Anyway, she's namely mentioned TVtropes now in "Ever After".
* It just bugs me, well, that the NostalgiaChick isn't really reviewing Nostalgic movies so much right now. I mean, yeah, I get that there is a ''point'' to what she says, but at the same time, I started looking at what she did because I was hoping that there would be a female point of view for certain movies. (Like TheSwanPrincess- I would ''love'' to see a review of that!) Instead, we get videos on the female:male ratio, and Disney Princess (just in general). I mean, I ''get'' that's she done a lot of reviews, and that's awesome, I guess... I just wish she'd do ''movie'' reviews instead of talking about gender (in)equality in kids cartoons... Am I nuts?
** That bugs this troper a little as well, but she lets it pass for two reasons: The first is that the Chick is enrolled in a Master's degree program at USC which is apparently taking up a lot of her time, thus not leaving her with as much time to think up reviews. The second is that with the Smurfette Principle at least, there was a pretty good reason for her to apply it to Nostalgia cartoons (as she put it, she herself was basically the knock-off female counterpart to the Critic). I also suspect that she did so many Disney cartoons at that time because ''ThePrincessAndTheFrog'' was coming out and thus a lot of people were talking about Disney princess movies. On a final note, this troper would also love to see ''TheSwanPrincess'' reviewed.
*** Thanks. I was starting to feel kinda guilty about being a smidge annoyed, but this turned this "ItJustBugsMe into a "I'm cool with that."
** Her My Little Pony review seemed sort of aimless, she seemed uninterested, looked tired, and mostly just discussed the brand in general instead of actually review anything, maybe trying to make videos so close to finals is getting to her?
*** Seems to be it. In her
new page. ''Showgirls'' review, she seems to be two seconds away from falling asleep in front of the camera. Granted some of it could just be her pretending to be alluring, but still, she seemed rather zonked.
**** PRETENDING to be alluring?! She doesn't need to pretend!
* Did Lindsay watch All Dogs Go to Heaven before the Ferngully review? The original BigLippedAlligatorMoment ISN'T a BigLippedAlligatorMoment! The Alligator carries the main characters home, if that doesn't advance the plot, I don't know what does...
** Does he carry them home? Yes. Does that explain the presence of the Esther Williams tribute? No.
** But the only reason they needed to be carried home was because they were brought to the big lipped alligator's place to begin with. If that scene never happened, they wouldn't had been brought to a place they needed a ride home from.
*** Here's how this troper sees it: it's like the belowmentioned death of Screweyes thing. It's not a BLAM that King Gator is introduced, it's the fact that he launches into a full-blown water-ballet number for absolutely no reason. It's also worth mentioning that the Chick said that a BLAM has ''little'' to no relation to the plot, not "none at all". Splitting hairs yes, but still...
** The Alligator shows up again and rescues Charlie at the end. He's apparently also responsible for the antagonist Carface being in the afterlife at the very end, since he's last seen licking his lips and chasing after him...I'd say that he's pretty integral to the plot resolution myself. The point of the musical number, as far as I could see, was to set-up his reason for feeling so protective of Charlie in the first place...he enjoyed "making music" with him. Slightly rickety plotting if you ask me, but hardly a BLAM (and certainly no more so than any other song and dance number in any other animated musical). Oh well, it's too late now - the name's stuck.
** Also, in We're Back, how is Professor Screweyes dying a BigLippedAlligatorMoment? The main antagonist of the movie is killed! How does that not advance the plot?
*** The fact that he dies isn't a BigLippedAlligatorMoment, the fact that he's ''devoured by crows'' is. The crows come out of nowhere with no explanation, their presence makes no sense, and the crows are never referenced again.
*** Except that the crows have been around Screweyes the entire movie, and prior to his death scene they were implied to be his pets or something. The fact that they were just waiting for a chance to eat him was a minor plot twist.
*** Okay, since when do crows eat people, and what caused him to attract the crows to him like that?
** The trope "is named after the random musical dance number". It's the dance number people that constitutes the BLAM, not the alligator. Also, the crows just land on Screweyes in a bird-shape, sit there and then he's gone. They don't eat him, he's just gone. THAT's the BLAM.
*** Yes, but the purpose of the musical number in question was to set up the alligator's reason for a) not eating Charlie and b) later returning and saving Charlie from drowning (and killing his enemy) - he thought Charlie had a beautiful voice and enjoyed making music with him. I agree that Bluth could have found a less contrived way of freeing Charlie from the anchor and getting rid of Carface in the end, but what can you do? Oh, and my guess is that the crows from "We're Back" were supposed to be symbolic. Screweyes was consumed by his own fears.
**** You know, for kids!
**** They established that King Gator was enamored of Charlie's voice in the bit in which Charlie howls and King Gater spits him out ''right before the music number''. And then the scene ''morphs into a completely different location'' with a giant freaking clam, ''for no reason whatsoever, never mentioned again or commented on''. So no, King Gator's presence and his liking of Charlie's voice isn't a Big Lipped Alligator Moment, the actual water ballet number is. It's established right before the number starts that King Gator likes Charlie's voice. You could take the entire number out and still get Gator happily saying "How can you expect me to eat a voice a sumptuous as this?" which would pretty clearly indicate that he likes the sound of Charlie's voice.
***** Here's the thing though, and this is truly where the BLAM falls apart, King Gator DOES refer to the musical number. When he returns for the climax, he sings the "Togetherrrr" part of the song. Rumor even has it that Doug & Lindsay found out they were wrong about King Gator's song being a BLAM and apologized on the TGWTG Forums, but by then, it was far too late (but not too late for them to stop using the gag, which they both seemingly have).
**** Rumour? And besides, the last time Doug used it was a bored variant in his Flubber review, which was only a month or so ago.
* Why is it that, when the NC makes a joke about autism, there's an uproar, yet when the Nostalgia Chick says VERY CLEARLY in her Enchanted Christmas review "I'm going to throw an autistic temper tantrum!" [[DoubleStandard no one says anything about it?]]. Is it just that she's a "hot woman" again?
** This troper saw people in the comments section of that review who complained about it.
** There's an uproar? really? All this troper saw was "LOL @ AUTISM" because Autistics are still Highly AcceptableTargets.
** I think the real question is "Why is it that people complain when someone jokes about autism, [[DoubleStandard yet they are cool with jokes about other handicaps and offensive material]] (aside from Mako apparently)?"
* The Nostalgia Chick's video Ever After. It seemed unsure of itself, she didn't particularly review any one movie with much detail, it didn't seem to analyze Cinderella remakes so much just give examples of them, and the use of Nella seemed gratuitous and not very relevant to anything in particular besides dresses. Her reviews seem to be getting more and more vague, I miss her giving straightforward reviews like with Showgirls.
** You say that like it's been years since Showgirls. It was two reviews ago. And watching the actual review, it seems like the problem is that it shouldn't have been labeled as an Ever After review. Like Blonde Girls and Disney Princesses, it should have simply been advertised as an analysis of the Cinderella story rather than any one retelling of it. And at this point, BFF Nella is basically fanservice. She's awesome.
*** But Nella didn't even do anything in that video. She just sort of stood around in a dress trying to be funny with nothing to go on. And I don't have problem with her analysis videos, but this one just felt weak. She didn't really discuss or deconstruct or bring anything profound to the table, it felt more like "Here's some clips of Enchanted. Here's some clips of Cinderella. LOL this song is weird. h, that was only three minutes? Here's some clips of Nella for padding." It was just sub-par.
**** In her review of Grease the Nostalgia Chick said at the end that she needed to raise money for her thesis. Also, in Film Brain's commentary for ''Kickassia'', it was said that the Nostalgia Chick spent every bit of free time that she had working on a paper for college. If she has indeed been that busy [[Tropers/{{loracarol}} I]] could ''totally'' see why her videos might be considered "subpar"- she's still putting them out for us, though, and for that I'm grateful. ^_~
**** Seconded. This troper actually enjoyed the Ever After review personally, if only because it was refreshing to see someone acknowledge the UnfortunateImplications and WallBangers those stories have while at the same time pointing out the good and enjoyable qualities they possess. Most people seem to swing one way or the other.
* How in the heck is Enchanted a Cinderella retelling?
** It's not a retelling but more on a comparison and analysis on a modern take of the traditional fairy tale archetype.
** It also has a poor, downtrodden girl who is being targeted by a wicked stepmother who dreams of meeting her prince charming and living happily ever after.
*** That's also the premise of Snow White. Enchanted was a parody of Disney movies and fairy tales in ''general'', not a retelling of Cinderella.
* Nostalgia Chick's reaction to the end of {{Mulan}} just bugs me. Here we have a probably 16/17(if not younger) year old girl who just fought in a war that doesn't allow women, defeated the BigBad, "regained" her families honor, and now she wants to go home. What's wrong with that? I mean- RealWomenNeverWearDresses much?
** In the Ever After review, it seemed that the Chick was more peeved that Mulan opted to go off and get married rather than take a position of wealth and influence by the Emperor. Of course, she also states in the same review that opinions on things like that basically boiled down to a person's viewpoint on the matter. For the record, the Chick said that she really likes ''Enchanted'' and ''Beauty and the Beast'', both of which have heroines that act pretty feminine and ultimately get married as their happy endings, so it's hard to say on her views of that particular trope.
*** My beef with that though is that Mulan ''doesn't'' go home to get married. She just decides to go home. Then the guy follows her there, but the movie doesn't end with them necessarily starting up a relationship. Just him staying for dinner. Yeah the sequel added the whole marriage thing, but it wasn't made by the same people and is considered non-canon by like 95% of Disney fans. Can't really judge the movie's ending based on what a lesser sequel decided happened next.
*** Well to be fair, at the end of the review The Nostalgia Chick admits that in spite of all her little complaints she still can't help but enjoy the movie. So it's not like she ''hates'' the movie or says it's bad or anything.
*** This troper got the feeling that it was more she passed up an extremely prestigious job offered by the ''Emperor of China''. In other words, she had a shot at a very fulfilling and influential position and passed. Still, the complaint came more as a personal peeve on the Chick's part. As the troper above said, the Chick clearly did like the movie and the gender role message.
*** It might be the fact that the ending of her turning down political influence and a shot at becoming something important in order to run off and be a normal housewife was a little too close to the ending of Anastasia, which also seriously irked Lindsay, only Anastasia blatantly left for a boy.
* [[MST3KMantra Trivial but curious]]... The Chick notes that [[RealLifeWritesThePlot three months have passed]] between her ''{{Transformers}}'' and ''{{Armageddon}}'' reviews. Meanwhile, the Critic wakes up from her chloroforming him. Was he slumped on his desk for three months?
* The Nostalgia Chick's [[{{Disney/Hercules}} Hercules]] review. She said little about the music for one, and why she dislikes it. More importantly she talked ''very'' little about the relationships. The movie revolves around Meg, Hercules, and Hades. Not the plot. She said little about Meg and Hercules, Meg and Hades, Hercules and the centaur, or any of them individually.
** Except for when she went into detail about how the music didn't seem right. Wild sassy gospel choir music and roman myth she said were too unrelated to eachother to really make sense. And she did go into detail about how Meg is a complex character and her relation with Hades is interesting and almost like a sassy friendship. She also talked about how Hades seemed to go by his word moreso than Hercules did, and discussed how Hercules is an incredibly bland character. And what do you mean by "the movie does not revolve around the plot"? What else is a movie supposed to follow, besides the ''plot''?

Top