random item

Troperville

Tools

Find recent edits by troper:

back to: Headscratchers / Supernatural

edit article | go to discussion page

16th May '13 9:46:38 AM masterzora

Send masterzora a PM notification explaining the badness of natter: natter-fy

Changed line(s) 277 (click to see context) from:

* Is it just me, or should we really NOT be rooting for Sam not to take the final Trial here? Yes, Sam will die, yes, Dean would be devastated, but how can the writers really expect the audience to not put every single Demon related death on Sam and Dean now? Yes, the sacrifice thing had been done, but so much time had been put into the trials this season and now it just seems pointless, yes I get that Dean finds Sam to be more important then strangers that they have to save, and vice versa, but at the same time, this is not a lucifer vs michael situation where the planet would be roasted if either or both of them said yes, this is not a deal that lands them in hell, at worst, they go to heaven, and have a chance of being thrown out and put back on earth. They are soldiers in a pointless war that one or both of them will end up dead in a much more horrific way anyway, so why can't Sam and Dean accept the fact, that they will be saving thousands of lives with only ONE fatality? And more importantly, how are we supposed to cheer for them after this? Because, like I said, every single demon related death that happens from now on is THEIR fault.

to:

16th May '13 6:43:47 AM Lavaros

Send Lavaros a PM notification explaining the badness of natter: natter-fy

Changed line(s) 275 (click to see context) from:

to:

* Live Free or Twihard. Why oh why if Sam is so smart and quick thinking, didn't he just reassure Dean that he was going to be fine because Samuel had a cure for vampirism? It would have made so much more sense, and would have explained why Sam was so calm. By lying, he just made things unnecessarily complicated - not exactly in-character behavior for someone whose MO was CuttingTheKnot.

*Is it just me, or should we really NOT be rooting for Sam not to take the final Trial here? Yes, Sam will die, yes, Dean would be devastated, but how can the writers really expect the audience to not put every single Demon related death on Sam and Dean now? Yes, the sacrifice thing had been done, but so much time had been put into the trials this season and now it just seems pointless, yes I get that Dean finds Sam to be more important then strangers that they have to save, and vice versa, but at the same time, this is not a lucifer vs michael situation where the planet would be roasted if either or both of them said yes, this is not a deal that lands them in hell, at worst, they go to heaven, and have a chance of being thrown out and put back on earth. They are soldiers in a pointless war that one or both of them will end up dead in a much more horrific way anyway, so why can't Sam and Dean accept the fact, that they will be saving thousands of lives with only ONE fatality? And more importantly, how are we supposed to cheer for them after this? Because, like I said, every single demon related death that happens from now on is THEIR fault.

14th May '13 9:28:10 AM SeanRenaud

Send SeanRenaud a PM notification explaining the badness of natter: natter-fy

Changed line(s) 273 (click to see context) from:

to:

13th May '13 11:18:51 PM Lightning4119

Send Lightning4119 a PM notification explaining the badness of natter: natter-fy

Changed line(s) 272 (click to see context) from:

to:

*** It is peculiar though, that Castiel can remember bits of obscure trivia such as humanity's first discovery and consumption of coffee beans, but he does not understand eggs. However, the real headscratcher was his near-smiting of the convenience store clerk over the lack of pie. Cas had spent weeks teleporting from one restaurant to another to evade angelic pursuit. By that point the concept of if-this-store-doesn't-have-it-then-go-to-another-one should have been obvious to anyone with intellect greater than a child. Hence the reason many fans perceive the whole scene as having been yet more ShipTease on the part of the writers, as opposed to just Cas holding the IdiotBall, again.

12th May '13 10:09:35 PM psionycx

Send psionycx a PM notification explaining the badness of natter: natter-fy

Changed line(s) 271 (click to see context) from:

to:

** Castiel spent the entirety of the previous episode being horribly injured, after weeks if not months of constantly moving from one place to another with nothing but coffee to keep his strength up, and then when he ''finally'' manages to get back to Sam and Dean, Dean is angry with him and won't accept an apology. The poor guy was mentally and physically fried, and trying to regain enough control over himself to do something as simple as shopping must've been quite difficult for him. Hence the uncomprehending child-like actions in the grocery store.
*** It is peculiar though, that Castiel can remember bits of obscure trivia such as humanity's first discovery and consumption of coffee beans, but he does not understand eggs. However, the real headscratcher was his near-smiting of the convenience store clerk over the lack of pie. Cas had spent weeks teleporting from one restaurant to another to evade angelic pursuit. By that point the concept of if-this-store-doesn't-have-it-then-go-to-another-one should have been obvious to anyone with intellect greater than a child. Hence the reason many fans perceive the whole scene as having been yet more ShipTease on the part of the writers, as opposed to just Cas holding the IdiotBall, again.

12th May '13 6:29:26 AM lackingwittytitle

Send lackingwittytitle a PM notification explaining the badness of natter: natter-fy

Changed line(s) 270 (click to see context) from:

to:

12th May '13 2:15:58 AM Lightning4119

Send Lightning4119 a PM notification explaining the badness of natter: natter-fy

Changed line(s) 79 (click to see context) from:

to:

9th May '13 11:29:25 PM blackjack437

Send blackjack437 a PM notification explaining the badness of natter: natter-fy

Changed line(s) 269 (click to see context) from:

to: