History Headscratchers / SpiderManHomecoming

** As seen in [[Film\AvengersEndGame]] the definately built a kill feature into Peter's suits.

** Also Mr. Delmar remarked that she was a "hot Italian woman" which they probably did add in accordance to MarisaTomei and her background, so it's possible she did just marry into the family. Apparently Parker is an English/French surname according to research.

** ''Film/AvengersEndgame'' further disproves the "8 years later" time card. The film shows via large text that the ''The Avengers'' took place in 2012, ''Thor: The Dark World'' took place in 2013, and ''Guardians of the Galaxy'' took place in 2014'', all the years the films were released in (the year for ''Guardians'' was already implied by the prologue, which was stated to take place in 1988 and the main story was shown to take place 26 years after that). 2014 Ebony Maw mentions that present day Nebula's time signature came from nine years in the future, putting the present day events of ''Endgame'' in 2023, which was specifically shown to be five years after Thanos' snap. That puts ''Infinity War'' as taking place in 2018, the year it was released, matching up with Tony's "six years" comment. So ''Homecoming'' could not take place eight years after ''The Avengers'', which would be 2020, as that would be during the five year period in which half of all life in the universe, including Spider-Man, had been snapped out of existence.

** OK, I think I've found the answer. There was no mess up. Hector Navarro explained the timeline in the comments of an SJ News video, so I'll just shamelessly leave what he said here: "''Film/TheAvengers2012'' ''didn't'' take place in 2012. ''Film/IronMan'' ''did'' take place in 2008. Six months later was ''Film/IronMan2'', in 2008/2009. Along with ''Film/TheIncredibleHulk'' and ''Film/{{Thor}}'', all three of these movies take place in the same week. And a bit after that, Nick Fury finds Steve Rogers thawed out from his suspended animation. Avengers took place about a year after that, in 2009/2010. Cut to ''Film/CaptainAmericaCivilWar'' where Vision says "In the 8 years since Mr. Stark announced himself as Iron Man..." which yeah, puts that at 2016. ''Film/SpiderManHomecoming'' took place during and a few months after that, in 2016/2017. So if ''Film/TheAvengers2012'' took place in 2009, eight years later could be 2017. And Peter Parker would've been seven or eight years old in ''Film/IronMan2'', during 2008/2009."

** Nah, he does want to kill people. He clearly said that he will kill Peter dead. He just gave Peter one chance to walk away for saving his daughter, and probably doing Peter another one last favor for saving his life by keeping Peter's identity secret.]

** ''Film/AvengersEndgame'' disproves the "8 years later" time card. The film shows via large text that the ''The Avengers'' took place in 2012, ''Thor: The Dark World'' took place in 2013, and ''Guardians of the Galaxy'' took place in 2014'', all the years the films were released in (the year for ''Guardians'' was already implied by the prologue, which was stated to take place in 1988 and the main story was shown to take place 26 years after that). 2014 Ebony Maw mentions that present day Nebula's time signature came from nine years in the future, putting the present day events of ''Endgame'' in 2023, which was specifically shown to be five years after Thanos' snap. That puts ''Infinity War'' as taking place in 2018, the year it was released, matching up with Tony's "six years" comment. So ''Homecoming'' could not take place eight years after ''The Avengers'', which would be 2020, as that would be during the five year period in which half of all life in the universe, including Spider-Man, had been snapped out of existence.

** Because Thaddeus Ross was ([[VoodooShark for some reason]]) stupid enough to put a "this ONLY applies to Avengers" clause in the Accords. Thus, Peter can't be forced to sign the Accords, or forced to obey Ross' whims, unless he becomes an Avenger. Which, in turn, explains why Peter refused Stark's offer.

** It's also possible that Civil War takes place further in the future than we're, since we have no definite dates on any of the movies aside from Film/TheAvengers2012. The only evidence otherwise are some interviews stating the release dates of the movies are the approximate years the movies take place in. Of course it could be an error as the other Troper stated. Perhaps they'll fix it for home media and it slipped through the cracks.

* Why are they shooting at him? Let's assume those cops in the helicopter don't watch YouTube, Peter must have been featured on the news dozens of times. I can't see a guy web-slinging around the city and fighting crooks, and not be on the 6 o' clock news. This Spider-man is not Batman where he is rarely seen by civilians, and operates mostly at night.

** On top of that, Spider-Man hasn't been wearing his current Stark-designed suit in public enough for him to be easily recognized as the same kid in a red hoodie that was swinging around New York in some viral YouTube videos. The cops just saw a guy in a weird red and blue skintight suit scaling the Washington Monument and reacted accordingly. They may have thought it was Alain Robert up to his usual tricks.

* You know how characters in cartoons blink their eyes through their masks? I thought that was the case in this film, similar to Ryan Renald's Deadpool. If his blinking eyes are artificial, why would Tony add that in his suit? What purpose would it serve in battle besides giving Peter facial expressions?

* You know how characters in cartoons blink their eyes through their masks? I thought that was the case in this live action film, similar to Deadpool. If his blinking eyes are artificial, why would Tony add that in his suit? What purpose would it serve in battle besides giving Peter expressions? A distraction?

* You know how characters in cartoons blink their eyes through their masks? I thought that was the case in this film. If his blinking eyes are artificial, why would Tony add that in his suit? What purpose would it serve in battle besides giving Peter expressions?

* When Peter [[spoiler:arrives at the Avengers compound, there's brand new Quinjets in place and at least one is taking off to the horizon]]. Given the events of Civil War, and that the "legal" Avengers amount to, at most, Tony, Rhodey, and Vision, [[spoiler:and Tony is currently busy meeting Peter]], who do they have on call to take missions from the UN at this point?

* Toomes is like Norman Osborn/Green Goblin in many ways, and I doubt it is unintentional. [[spoiler: He is the father of one of Peter's friends.]] The scene with Peter and Toomes in the car reminds me of Norman and Peter at the dinner table scene in the first Spider-man movie. Doesn't his "wings" remind you of the goblin glider? Don't get me wrong, I like Norman and Harry, but they already did the whole [[spoiler: "my-friend's-dad-is-my nemesis-and-I-must-So-stop-him"]] bit.

** Nah, he does want to kill people. He clearly said that he will kill Peter dead. He just gave Peter one chance to walk away for saving his daughter, [[spoiler: and probably doing Peter another one last favor for saving his life by keeping Peter's identity secret.]]
** He definitely has no qualms killing. Unless you think he didn't expect [[spoiler: to kill Peter by dropping a building on top of him.]]

[[folder: The announcement at the end. SPOILERS!]]

*** How would Stark know ? He saw Fury show up in a mothballed old helicarrier with operatives who were dressed casually. As if he pulled them from civilian life and into a rescue mission. Nothing about their revival screamed SHIELD back was into action. Only that it’s former leader showed up with former agents to save the day.