Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / Paul

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Typos


*** True, but that would only disprove the idea that the Biblical God created Man in his own exact image. Paul would still have trouble explaining how his species and humanity look so similar if he really believes that they are both the product if independent evolution comming from entirely different gene pools. Intelligent design doesn't have to mean the Abrahamic God created humans in his own image.

to:

*** True, but that would only disprove the idea that the Biblical God created Man in his own exact image. Paul would still have trouble explaining how his species and humanity look so similar if he really believes that they are both the product if of independent evolution comming coming from entirely different gene pools. Intelligent design doesn't have to mean the Abrahamic God created humans in his own image.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** His home world. He was just making a ''Film/BackToTheFuture'' reference, which [[FridgeBrilliance he could have come up with given his influence on pop culture.]] Plus given Paul's friendly personality, it's unlikely he'd sell her teeth to some aliens or something worse.

to:

** His home world. He was just making a ''Film/BackToTheFuture'' ''Film/BackToTheFuture1'' reference, which [[FridgeBrilliance he could have come up with given his influence on pop culture.]] Plus given Paul's friendly personality, it's unlikely he'd sell her teeth to some aliens or something worse.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Could HAVE, not could of.


** His home world. He was just making a ''Film/BackToTheFuture'' reference, which [[FridgeBrilliance he could of come up with given his influence on pop culture.]] Plus given Paul's friendly personality, it's unlikely he'd sell her teeth to some aliens or something worse.

to:

** His home world. He was just making a ''Film/BackToTheFuture'' reference, which [[FridgeBrilliance he could of have come up with given his influence on pop culture.]] Plus given Paul's friendly personality, it's unlikely he'd sell her teeth to some aliens or something worse.

Changed: 16

Removed: 44

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* After the group is caught out in the open after falling asleep in the woods, why don't they figure out the obvious plan that Paul figures out later when Clive stops them to buy the sword? Sending one of either Graeme or Clive to the RV while the other hides out with Paul makes way more sense than trying to walk all the way back with Paul in a really paper-thin disguise.
** because the Rule of Funny applies here...

to:

* After the group is caught out in the open after falling asleep in the woods, why don't they figure out the obvious plan that Paul figures out later when Clive stops them to buy the sword? Sending one of either Graeme or Clive to the RV while the other hides out with Paul makes way more sense than [[RuleOfFunny trying to walk all the way back with Paul in a really paper-thin disguise.
** because the Rule of Funny applies here...
disguise.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* After the group is caught out in the open after falling asleep in the woods, why don't they figure out the obvious plan that Paul figures out later when Clive stops them to buy the sword? Sending one of either Graeme or Clive to the RV while the other hides out with Paul makes way more sense than trying to walk all the way back with Paul in a really paper-thin disguise.

to:

* After the group is caught out in the open after falling asleep in the woods, why don't they figure out the obvious plan that Paul figures out later when Clive stops them to buy the sword? Sending one of either Graeme or Clive to the RV while the other hides out with Paul makes way more sense than trying to walk all the way back with Paul in a really paper-thin disguise.disguise.
** because the Rule of Funny applies here...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Paul never told them he could do it, remember he escaped because they were going to vivisect him, he intentionally kept this ability hidden from the people holding him, otherwise they would probably force him to do it to their Need to know people and cut him up earlier because they wouldn't need him, if they already knew what he did.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** I think that was rather the point. Paul even makes the point that his existence only disproves "one world views". The use of the term "Traditional, Abrahamic God" is technically wrong because as you point out above not all Abrahamic faiths would discount the existence of aliens, however many people in the Abrahamic religions would (which is the view of "traditional" being used here) which is the point that Paul is making that obviously if there were aliens then that wouldn't make sense. This film isn't about an attack on religion. The reality is many religions are open to the idea of aliens, many are open to the idea of evolution. There are people who believe that evolution and God exist side by side. There are some people who don't believe that but who respect other people's beliefs. None of that's an issue. The argument is never "aliens exist, religion's stupid". The argument is just "don't be closed-minded, there's more to the universe than may be dreamt of in your philosophy". The film never tries to disprove any religion that's open to a grander universe.


Added DiffLines:

**** Regarding the healing abilities, there's no reason to assume that it needs to be used on Paul's own species. Keep in mind the first time we saw it was Paul using it to heal a dead bird and then eating it. He explains that he's not going to eat a "dead bird". As humans, we naturally always eat dead animals rather than living ones. However, maybe Paul's species is different. Maybe for the animals on his planet meat spoils quickly after death and so they have to eat living beings as Paul did with the bird. If so, the ability to bring something back to life would be a significant evolutionary advantage as it would allow them to scavenge dead animals. The point is, it's quite possible that it could serve as an advantage, especially only if used on small creatures as Paul did at first. As mentioned above, camouflage could serve to protect him from predators which it's quite possible do (or at least did) exist in whatever environment he happens to occupy. Regarding the ExpositionBeam it's not really that taxing. It's more tiring that a conversation for day to day communication, but compared to the time and energy taken to impart knowledge on a new generation it'd be a huge advantage so it makes perfect sense that it would be a favoured evolutionary trait.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**** Looking at Paul's character, does anyone honestly think that it would have been at all out of character for him to ask a male and female character if they're having sex by miming a sex act at them? He's a crude character. There's nothing homophobic about the fact that he mimed a sex act at two male characters to ask whether they were having sex.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Hey Its That Guy cut by TRS decision. Ditto for Hey Its That Voice.


** It would be hard to do a trailer without some of her dialogue, and her voice is [[HeyItsThatVoice pretty recognizable]]. They probably couldn't help it.

to:

** It would be hard to do a trailer without some of her dialogue, and her voice is [[HeyItsThatVoice pretty recognizable]].recognizable. They probably couldn't help it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Lastly, the [[HealingHands healing hands]] ability is not very well explained, but seems to work by transferring the injury to someone else who is capable of surviving it. Excellent for use on humans and birds who don't have Paul's [[Franchise/{{X-Men}} wolverine healing]], but next to useless on members of his own species. If everyone on his planet heals from injuries near-instantaneously, then what's the point of transferring wounds at all? By the time something is grave enough to need it, the person you're trying to help will be dead.

to:

** Lastly, the [[HealingHands healing hands]] ability is not very well explained, but seems to work by transferring the injury to someone else who is capable of surviving it. Excellent for use on humans and birds who don't have Paul's [[Franchise/{{X-Men}} [[ComicBook/{{Wolverine}} wolverine healing]], but next to useless on members of his own species. If everyone on his planet heals from injuries near-instantaneously, then what's the point of transferring wounds at all? By the time something is grave enough to need it, the person you're trying to help will be dead.
N

Added: 332

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Since the details aren't explained, it could be that the injury is ''temporarily'' transferred. The rapid healing that follows it may be a function of the healing hands itself - in which case, it would be incredibly useful. Quite a lot of injuries would be fatal (or permanently disfiguring or crippling) but not immediately so.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Unless there are dangerous predators that also live like that. It's possible that Paul comes from a planet, or region of a planet, with a high density of forests and very dangerous creatures both in the trees and on the ground. Then it would make sense for primates to evolve where possible to move about at night and survive by moving carefully through the trees. If the predators then evolved to hunt them more effectively the invisibility power could have come as they developed the psychic abilities.


Added DiffLines:

*** Paul says repeatedly that it's basically the sum of all his knowledge so it's not just a thought beam, it's a literal mind meld with him. This is not an efficient means of communication. I'd assume it's something that's mostly only used to pass down life experience to the next generation of children or to transfer information on a dangerous area or even military action. I doubt it's a part of everyday life at this point.


Added DiffLines:

*** The Healing Hands thing could easily have been a psychic ability that was useful before their bodies got to the point of massive self-regeneration that held over due to the usefulness in keeping children or even pets / livestock alive. Just because it's not useful now doesn't mean that it was never a factor in their lives. Could be like their appendix for all we know and that's why it's so draining on them.


Added DiffLines:

*** Also people seem to be missing the obvious explanation that they somehow evolved psychic powers in general and these are simply the ones we see in the movie. It's possible there are others we aren't shown, it's possible other people in Paul's race have different abilities or just generally that they simply possess psychic powers in general.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Basic human psychology states that you're more likely to retain knowledge if you understand it. Paul is completely alien (literally) knowledge imparted would be highly confusing and hard to grasp without some guiding hand.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** If anything, Zoil's headscratching behavior is keeping the two rookies close, and during that time, belittles the hell out of them any chance he gets. He only tries to cut them loose after O'Reilly actually sees Paul confirming Haggards suspicions that they were chasing an alien, and at that point they're more than happy to try and snag Paul before Zoil to elevate themselves above him. Zoil could have sent them on a wild goose chase, or some other way to misdirect them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** When re-watching, Zoil's actions come across as him trying to run interference for Paul without blowing his cover that he's Paul's accomplice on the inside. He assumes Haggard and O'Reilly are Keystone Kops-ish, and figures he can control them. He wasn't expecting them to grow a pair and try and muscle him out. It's only when they do, and when The Big Guy makes it obvious she's going to head out there herself that he drops the pretense of keeping his cover. First viewing this seems like he's starting to lose it because of the near misses and goes rogue, on the subsequent viewings him shooting out the radio comes across as "screw it, I gotta go make sure he gets away okay."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** It's not hard to look up where someone currently lives.

to:

** It's not hard to look up where someone currently lives.lives.
* After the group is caught out in the open after falling asleep in the woods, why don't they figure out the obvious plan that Paul figures out later when Clive stops them to buy the sword? Sending one of either Graeme or Clive to the RV while the other hides out with Paul makes way more sense than trying to walk all the way back with Paul in a really paper-thin disguise.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** His home world. He was just making a Film/BackToTheFuture reference, which [[FridgeBrillance he could of come up with given his influence on pop culture.]] Plus given Paul's friendly personality, it's unlikely he'd sell her teeth to some aliens or something worse.

to:

** His home world. He was just making a Film/BackToTheFuture ''Film/BackToTheFuture'' reference, which [[FridgeBrillance [[FridgeBrilliance he could of come up with given his influence on pop culture.]] Plus given Paul's friendly personality, it's unlikely he'd sell her teeth to some aliens or something worse.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Lastly, the [[HealingHands healing hands]] ability is not very well explained, but seems to work by transferring the injury to someone else who is capable of surviving it. Excellent for use on humans and birds who don't have Paul's [[XMen wolverine healing]], but next to useless on members of his own species. If everyone on his planet heals from injuries near-instantaneously, then what's the point of transferring wounds at all? By the time something is grave enough to need it, the person you're trying to help will be dead.

to:

** Lastly, the [[HealingHands healing hands]] ability is not very well explained, but seems to work by transferring the injury to someone else who is capable of surviving it. Excellent for use on humans and birds who don't have Paul's [[XMen [[Franchise/{{X-Men}} wolverine healing]], but next to useless on members of his own species. If everyone on his planet heals from injuries near-instantaneously, then what's the point of transferring wounds at all? By the time something is grave enough to need it, the person you're trying to help will be dead.
BestOf MOD

Changed: 8

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Namespace


* Why the hell did they [[http://trailers.apple.com/trailers/universal/paul/ reveal]] that SigourneyWeaver is in the film?

to:

* Why the hell did they [[http://trailers.apple.com/trailers/universal/paul/ reveal]] that SigourneyWeaver Creator/SigourneyWeaver is in the film?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Evolution may favor traits that are beneficial or neutral, but that doesn't mean that every trait a species has is necessarily beneficial or neutral, even if they have evolved over the process of billions of years. Evolution isn't a ladder that organisms climb up to become objectively "superior". Sometimes it helps and sometimes it screws us over. Case in point: [[GroinAttack Wouldn't that agent(and men all around the world) have been better off if his testicles were located inside his body?]] Why aren't they? Because sperm cells need to be kept cool or else they die.[[DidNotDoTheResearch If evolution were as perfect and direct a system as you seem to expect it to be]], we would have evolved to the point that such a vulnerability was wiped out of our genetic code.

to:

** Evolution may favor traits that are beneficial or neutral, but that doesn't mean that every trait a species has is necessarily beneficial or neutral, even if they have evolved over the process of billions of years. Evolution isn't a ladder that organisms climb up to become objectively "superior". Sometimes it helps and sometimes it screws us over. Case in point: [[GroinAttack Wouldn't that agent(and men all around the world) have been better off if his testicles were located inside his body?]] Why aren't they? Because sperm cells need to be kept cool or else they die.[[DidNotDoTheResearch If evolution were as perfect and direct a system as you seem to expect it to be]], be, we would have evolved to the point that such a vulnerability was wiped out of our genetic code.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Evolution may favor traits that are beneficial or neutral, but that doesn't mean that every trait a species has is necessarily beneficial or neutral, even if they have evolved over the process of billions of years. Evolution isn't a ladder that organisms climb up to become objectively "superior". Sometimes it helps and sometimes it screws us over. Case in point: [[GroinAttack Wouldn't that agent(and men all around the world) have been better off if his testicles were located inside his body?]] Why aren't they? Because sperm cells need to be kept cool or else they die.[[DidNotDoTheResearch If evolution were as perfect and direct a system as you seem to expect it to be]], we would have evolved to the point that such a vulnerability was wiped out of our genetic code.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** His home world. He was just making a BackToTheFuture reference, which [[FridgeBrillance he could of come up with given his influence on pop culture.]] Plus given Paul's friendly personality, it's unlikely he'd sell her teeth to some aliens or something worse.

to:

** His home world. He was just making a BackToTheFuture Film/BackToTheFuture reference, which [[FridgeBrillance he could of come up with given his influence on pop culture.]] Plus given Paul's friendly personality, it's unlikely he'd sell her teeth to some aliens or something worse.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Or Paul's just a {{Troll}}.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Removing wick to Did Not Do The Research per rename at TRS.


* On a similar note, Paul downright states that his existence ''disproves'' the idea of the "Traditional, Abrahamic God". This is just pure DidNotDoTheResearch. Even if you accept the tenuous "I'm not in God's image!" line, the Abrahamic God is the God of Christianity, Judaism and Islam. Islam is actually fairly open to the possibility of other life in the universe; the Fatihah says "All praises be to God, Lord of all the worlds" (worlds, plural) and stuff like that. It's quite big on the wonders of the universe. Paul's existence doesn't disprove anything except Ruth's brand of strawman religion.

to:

* On a similar note, Paul downright states that his existence ''disproves'' the idea of the "Traditional, Abrahamic God". This is just pure DidNotDoTheResearch.wrong. Even if you accept the tenuous "I'm not in God's image!" line, the Abrahamic God is the God of Christianity, Judaism and Islam. Islam is actually fairly open to the possibility of other life in the universe; the Fatihah says "All praises be to God, Lord of all the worlds" (worlds, plural) and stuff like that. It's quite big on the wonders of the universe. Paul's existence doesn't disprove anything except Ruth's brand of strawman religion.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* On a similar note, Paul downright states that his existence ''disproves'' the idea of the "Traditional, Abrahamic God". This is just pure DidNotDoTheResearch. Even if you accept the tenuous "I'm not in God's image!" line, the Abrahamic God is the God of Christianity, Judaism and Islam. Islam is actually fairly open to the possibility of other life in the universe; the Fatihah says "All praises be to God, Lord of all the worlds" (worlds, plural) and stuff like that. It's quite big on the wonders of the universe. Paul's existence doesn't disprove anything except Ruth's brand of strawman religion.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** ''Any'' sci-fi film that brings up science vs. religion invents evidence and presents it against a (generally) ridiculous strawman, because almost any inverted FlatEarthAtheist is a strawman when put up against ''the premise of the story''. That's not to say that the strawman will always represent what people should think in RealLife, because in some works (such as various episodes of ''StarTrek''), they as much as go out of their way to say that the argument works specifically because of the out-of-the-ordinary stuff that makes it a sci-fi (or less commonly, fantasy) work. Granted, Ruth does present some of the less scientific things that even many orthodox and fundamentalist Christians don't believe, as well as the "earth is 4000 years old" thing which wasn't even officially stated in any Abrahamic literature (and is usually estimated to be around 6000, anyway), but she was the type of character who even in real life has been locked away from any sort of opposing argument and has trouble with her carefully-constructed world crashing down around her (Clive has the same problem, only his carefully-constructed worldview is that aliens are definitely, purely fictional, but it's so much cooler to act like they probably aren't). I found it interesting that Ruth's father actually has an easier time accepting Paul, because he places Paul within an available category in his worldview (calling him a demon) [[spoiler: and adjusts it as appropriate ("hand of God")]].

to:

*** ''Any'' sci-fi film that brings up science vs. religion invents evidence and presents it against a (generally) ridiculous strawman, because almost any inverted FlatEarthAtheist is a strawman when put up against ''the premise of the story''. That's not to say that the strawman will always represent what people should think in RealLife, because in some works (such as various episodes of ''StarTrek''), ''Franchise/StarTrek''), they as much as go out of their way to say that the argument works specifically because of the out-of-the-ordinary stuff that makes it a sci-fi (or less commonly, fantasy) work. Granted, Ruth does present some of the less scientific things that even many orthodox and fundamentalist Christians don't believe, as well as the "earth is 4000 years old" thing which wasn't even officially stated in any Abrahamic literature (and is usually estimated to be around 6000, anyway), but she was the type of character who even in real life has been locked away from any sort of opposing argument and has trouble with her carefully-constructed world crashing down around her (Clive has the same problem, only his carefully-constructed worldview is that aliens are definitely, purely fictional, but it's so much cooler to act like they probably aren't). I found it interesting that Ruth's father actually has an easier time accepting Paul, because he places Paul within an available category in his worldview (calling him a demon) [[spoiler: and adjusts it as appropriate ("hand of God")]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Well, it could be evolutionary programming.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Might be there's more to using his knowledge than just having the knowledge--experience to get the things right.


Added DiffLines:

** It's not hard to look up where someone currently lives.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* If Paul's ExpositionBeam can shove the entire contents of his head into a recipient, then why did the MIBs need him around for 60 years to advise them?

to:

* If Paul's ExpositionBeam can shove the entire contents of his head into a recipient, then why did the MIBs need him around for 60 years to advise them?them?
* How did Paul know Tara still lived in her childhood home? It’s exceedingly rare anymore for someone to spend their entire lives in the same place they were born and/or raised and yet Paul’s intuitions to go back to the site of his crash to find her is conveniently the right one.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Though one could take a sort of semantic approach and argue that since the species evolved the ''ability'' to genetically engineer themselves, then said genetic engineering is itself a part of their overall evolutionary history. Whether or not you'd consider that true evolution would depend largely on your definition of the term.

to:

*** Though one could take a sort of semantic approach and argue that since the species evolved the ''ability'' to genetically engineer themselves, then said genetic engineering is itself a part of their overall evolutionary history. Whether or not you'd consider that true evolution would depend largely on your definition of the term.term.
* If Paul's ExpositionBeam can shove the entire contents of his head into a recipient, then why did the MIBs need him around for 60 years to advise them?

Top