Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / Haven

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Placebo effect, most likely.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Given that nobody Nathan's age remembers him attending school or just being around with the last name of Hansen, it's likely that he was adopted before he started kindergarten. Most notably, in "Spiral," Duke recognizes Max Hansen as the guy who killed an entire family, but ''not'' as Nathan's father. He doesn't even consider that Max and Nathan might be related until Audrey painstakingly spells it out for him. And Duke has known Nathan since he was five years old.

to:

*** Given It doesn't appear that nobody any of Nathan's age remembers peers remember him attending school or just being around town with the a last name of Hansen, it's likely that he was adopted before he started kindergarten. Most notably, other than Wuornos, or remembers him having a dad other than the Chief. Like, in "Spiral," Duke recognizes Max Hansen as the guy who killed an entire family, family but ''not'' notably '''not''' as Nathan's father. He doesn't even consider The idea that Max and Nathan might be are related until Audrey painstakingly spells it needs to be spelled out for him. him by Audrey, and even then, the idea that Nathan is adopted never crosses his mind. And Duke has known Nathan since he was they were five years old. It seems that Nathan was most likely adopted before he started kindergarten.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Given that nobody Nathan's age, including Duke (who has known him since he was five) remembers Nathan attending school or just being around with the last name of Hansen, it's likely that he was adopted before he started kindergarten.

to:

*** Given that nobody Nathan's age, including Duke (who has known him since he was five) age remembers Nathan him attending school or just being around with the last name of Hansen, it's likely that he was adopted before he started kindergarten.kindergarten. Most notably, in "Spiral," Duke recognizes Max Hansen as the guy who killed an entire family, but ''not'' as Nathan's father. He doesn't even consider that Max and Nathan might be related until Audrey painstakingly spells it out for him. And Duke has known Nathan since he was five years old.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[fodler: William in the Barn]]
* So, William's behavior before TheReveal is a little odd, in retrospect. Everything he does in the Barn is supposed to be re-contextualized after TheReveal. He wanted it to be Mara walking out of the Barn. He wanted Lexie to remember she was originally Mara. He is annoyed that the persona that walks out is Audrey. But everything he did inside the Barn were things that would jog ''Audrey's'' memory, not Mara's. The AmenesiacResonance he tried to induce by disassembling a handgun and having one of his mooks threaten to shoot him makes '''zero sense''' in trying to get Lexie to remember she was Mara. That is 100% a BatmanGambit for Audrey. What is the missing motivation here? There might be some FridgeBrilliance there as to why Audrey walked out of the Barn and Mara didn't, but it still doesn't make sense, if William's end goal was to get Mara back.

to:

[[fodler: [[folder: William in the Barn]]
* So, William's behavior before TheReveal is a little odd, in retrospect. Everything he does in the Barn is supposed to be re-contextualized after TheReveal. He wanted it to be Mara walking out of the Barn. He wanted Lexie to remember she was originally Mara. He is annoyed that the persona that walks out is Audrey. But everything he did inside the Barn were things that would jog ''Audrey's'' memory, not Mara's. The AmenesiacResonance AmnesiacResonance he tried to induce by disassembling a handgun and having one of his mooks threaten to shoot him makes '''zero sense''' in trying to get Lexie to remember she was Mara. That is 100% a BatmanGambit for Audrey. What is the missing motivation here? There might be some FridgeBrilliance there as to why Audrey walked out of the Barn and Mara didn't, but it still doesn't make sense, if William's end goal was to get Mara back.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[/folder]]

[[fodler: William in the Barn]]
* So, William's behavior before TheReveal is a little odd, in retrospect. Everything he does in the Barn is supposed to be re-contextualized after TheReveal. He wanted it to be Mara walking out of the Barn. He wanted Lexie to remember she was originally Mara. He is annoyed that the persona that walks out is Audrey. But everything he did inside the Barn were things that would jog ''Audrey's'' memory, not Mara's. The AmenesiacResonance he tried to induce by disassembling a handgun and having one of his mooks threaten to shoot him makes '''zero sense''' in trying to get Lexie to remember she was Mara. That is 100% a BatmanGambit for Audrey. What is the missing motivation here? There might be some FridgeBrilliance there as to why Audrey walked out of the Barn and Mara didn't, but it still doesn't make sense, if William's end goal was to get Mara back.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



Granted, the show stinks at pretty much anything psychological. For being a psychiatrist, Claire spouts erroneous information about psychology all the time. But this seems like a pretty weird plot hole.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[/folder]]

[[folder: Jennifer's Medication]]
* In season 4, Jennifer is introduced as having a diagnosis of schizophrenia and being on several antipsychotic medications. This has worked to quell the voices she's hearing, and she's super shocked to find out that they're real and her doctors were wrong. The thing is...antipsychotics work, like pretty much all psychotropic drugs, by correcting an imbalance of chemicals in the brain. Which Jennifer doesn't have, because she ''doesn't have'' schizophrenia. Why on earth would antipsychotics work to quiet the voices from the Barn when the voices are supernatural in nature?

Granted, the show stinks at pretty much anything psychological. For being a psychiatrist, Claire spouts erroneous information about psychology all the time. But this seems like a pretty weird plot hole.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The relationship between Nathan's Trouble and Audrey's AntiMagic is weirdly never discussed, but it appears that Nathan can only feel Audrey when it's direct skin contact. They actually touch quite a bit prior to TheReveal, but thanks to careful costuming and acting, it's never skin-to-skin. Even in the pilot, Nathan pulls Audrey out of the car, but by her arm, not her hand, and they're both wearing thick coats. In "Butterfly," Audrey puts a hand on Nathan's shoulder to stop him attacking the Rev, which he can't feel through his shirt. In "Consumed," they can't seem to stop bumping into each other, but their hands are in their pockets and they're both wearing coats. In "Ball and Chain," they brush shoulders while discussing the case at the Gull, but while Nathan's wearing short sleeves, she's wearing a jacket. In the same episode, he taps her back to get her attention, which he can't feel thanks to her blazer. In "Harmony," Audrey tases him and he says he didn't feel it, and does not react when she checks him over and puts a hand on his arm, since he's wearing long sleeves. Even when he hands her a coffee at the start of "Ain't No Sunshine," he just misses brushing her hand. This doesn't really explain the NoodleIncident that is Nathan cutting Audrey out of the boa constrictor blanket in "Butterfly" while she was dressed in only a towel, except that he seems pretty uncomfortable about it and he probably tried really, really hard not to touch her or even look at her.

to:

** The relationship between Nathan's Trouble and Audrey's AntiMagic is weirdly never discussed, but it appears that Nathan can only feel Audrey when it's direct skin contact. They actually touch quite a bit prior to TheReveal, but thanks to careful costuming and acting, it's never skin-to-skin. Even They frequently rub shoulders, brush up against each other, or put a hand on a shoulder or arm in the pilot, Nathan pulls Audrey out of the car, early episodes, but by her arm, not her hand, and they're both always wearing thick coats. In "Butterfly," Audrey puts a hand on Nathan's shoulder to stop him attacking the Rev, which he can't feel through his shirt. In "Consumed," they can't seem to stop bumping into each other, but their hands are in their pockets and they're both wearing coats. In "Ball and Chain," they brush shoulders while discussing the case at the Gull, but while Nathan's wearing short sleeves, she's wearing a jacket. In the same episode, he taps her back to get her attention, which he can't feel thanks to her blazer. In "Harmony," Audrey tases him and he says he didn't feel it, and does not react when she checks him over and puts a hand on his arm, since he's wearing coats or long sleeves. Even when he hands her a coffee at the start of "Ain't No Sunshine," he just misses brushing her hand. This sleeves and it doesn't really explain the NoodleIncident that is Nathan cutting Audrey out of the boa constrictor blanket in "Butterfly" while she was dressed in only a towel, except that he seems pretty uncomfortable about it and he probably tried really, really hard not seem to touch her or even look at her.affect him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The relationship between Nathan's Trouble and Audrey's Anti-Magic is weirdly never discussed, but it appears that Nathan can only feel Audrey when it's direct skin contact. They actually touch quite a bit prior to TheReveal, but thanks to careful costuming and acting, it's never skin-to-skin. In "Butterfly," Audrey puts a hand on Nathan's shoulder to stop him attacking the Rev, which he can't feel through his shirt. In "Consumed," they can't seem to stop bumping into each other, but their hands are in their pockets and they're both wearing coats. In "Ball and Chain," they brush shoulders while discussing the case at the Gull, but while Nathan's wearing short sleeves, she's wearing a jacket. In the same episode, he taps her back to get her attention, which he can't feel thanks to her blazer. In "Harmony," Audrey tases him and he says he didn't feel it, and does not react when she checks him over and puts a hand on his arm, since he's wearing long sleeves. Even when he hands her a coffee at the start of "Ain't No Sunshine," he just misses brushing her hand. This doesn't really explain the NoodleIncident that is Nathan cutting Audrey out of the boa constrictor blanket in "Butterfly" while she was dressed in only a towel, except that he seems pretty uncomfortable about it and he probably tried really, really hard not to touch her or even look at her.

to:

** The relationship between Nathan's Trouble and Audrey's Anti-Magic AntiMagic is weirdly never discussed, but it appears that Nathan can only feel Audrey when it's direct skin contact. They actually touch quite a bit prior to TheReveal, but thanks to careful costuming and acting, it's never skin-to-skin. Even in the pilot, Nathan pulls Audrey out of the car, but by her arm, not her hand, and they're both wearing thick coats. In "Butterfly," Audrey puts a hand on Nathan's shoulder to stop him attacking the Rev, which he can't feel through his shirt. In "Consumed," they can't seem to stop bumping into each other, but their hands are in their pockets and they're both wearing coats. In "Ball and Chain," they brush shoulders while discussing the case at the Gull, but while Nathan's wearing short sleeves, she's wearing a jacket. In the same episode, he taps her back to get her attention, which he can't feel thanks to her blazer. In "Harmony," Audrey tases him and he says he didn't feel it, and does not react when she checks him over and puts a hand on his arm, since he's wearing long sleeves. Even when he hands her a coffee at the start of "Ain't No Sunshine," he just misses brushing her hand. This doesn't really explain the NoodleIncident that is Nathan cutting Audrey out of the boa constrictor blanket in "Butterfly" while she was dressed in only a towel, except that he seems pretty uncomfortable about it and he probably tried really, really hard not to touch her or even look at her.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The relationship between Nathan's Trouble and Audrey's Anti-Magic is weirdly never discussed, but it appears that Nathan can only feel Audrey when it's direct skin contact. They actually touch quite a bit prior to TheReveal, but thanks to careful costuming and acting, it's never skin-to-skin. In "Butterfly," Audrey puts a hand on Nathan's shoulder to stop him attacking the Rev, which he can't feel through his shirt. In "Consumed," they can't seem to stop bumping into each other, but their hands are in their pockets and they're both wearing coats. In "Ball and Chain," they brush shoulders while discussing the case at the Gull, but while Nathan's wearing short sleeves, she's wearing a jacket. In the same episode, he taps her back to get her attention, which he can't feel thanks to her blazer. In "Harmony," Audrey tases him and he says he didn't feel it, and does not react when she checks him over and puts a hand on his arm, since he's wearing long sleeves. Even when he hands her a coffee at the start of "Ain't No Sunshine," he just misses brushing her hand. This doesn't really explain the NoodleIncident that is Nathan cutting Audrey out of the boa constrictor blanket in "Butterfly" while she was dressed in only a towel, except that he seems pretty uncomfortable about it and he probably tried really, really hard not to touch her or even look at her.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Right. It's Audrey and Nathan who make the leap that Jackie's only returned when Nathan lost his, but the incident at the grocery store seems to be happening concurrently with the funeral, if not slightly before, so it's more likely that Ian ditched that Trouble before going to the Gull.


Added DiffLines:

[[folder:The Nightmare Trouble - cont.]]
* But another question involving Ian's Trouble: does his Trouble means he ''always'' has to be Troubled? Like, does he ever get a break from it, or does he just constantly have to be switching Troubles? If he were to cut Audrey, would he gain her AntiMagic?
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Or Audrey II isn't a natural brunette. Although it happens again in "Business as Usual," when the real Lucy Ripley, while brunette, isn't nearly the same shade of brunette as the Lucy who was in Haven.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** At various points in season 1, the Chief refers back to when Nathan was a "little kid" or a "little boy," and Nathan was also young enough when adopted that Garland felt it was appropriate to give him a middle name or change the one he had; Nathan mentions in "As You Were" that "Thaddeus" specifically came from him.

to:

*** At various points in season 1, the Chief refers back to when Nathan was a "little kid" or a "little boy," and it seems unlikely he'd do that if he'd adopted Nathan at eight or nine, given his parenting style. Nathan was also young enough when he was adopted that Garland felt it was appropriate to change or give him a middle name or change the one he had; name; Nathan mentions in "As You Were" that "Thaddeus" came specifically came from him. the Chief.

Top