Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / Ghostbusters

Go To

OR

Added: 120

Changed: 2

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Yeah, you'll notice that we never see them bust Fiorella [=LaGuardia=]. All he did was show up and have a long chat with the current mayor. He wasn't into wreaking havoc, and as a result we never hear of him being contested.

to:

*** Yeah, you'll notice that we never see them bust Fiorella Fiorello [=LaGuardia=]. All he did was show up and have a long chat with the current mayor. He wasn't into wreaking havoc, and as a result we never hear of him being contested.contested.
*** Though to be totally accurate on this one, the Ghostbusters were incarcerated in a psychiatric facility at the time.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** As David Hahn proved back I the say there is a surprising amount radioactive material floating around and if one is smart enough you can build a working nuclear reactor out of basic power tools. Egon could probably whip up a working enrichment system in the office.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Based on context Slimer is a vapor cloud with some humanlike features rather then a fully humanoid boud, a vapor, hes not the result of a person dying and leaving a psychic imprint, non-temrinal, he shows up again and again over the hears, repeating phantasm, and hes able to go where he likes but tends to return to one specific haunt, full roaming and focused repectively. The class thing is more technical and related to types of ghosts rather then strength.

to:

** Based on context Slimer is a vapor cloud with some humanlike features rather then a fully humanoid boud, body, a vapor, hes not the result of a person dying and leaving a psychic imprint, non-temrinal, he shows up again and again over the hears, years, repeating phantasm, and hes able to go where he likes but tends to return to one specific haunt, full roaming and focused repectively. The class thing is more technical and related to types of ghosts rather then strength.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Based on context Slimer is a vapor cloud with some humanlike features rather then a fully humanoid boud, a vapor, hes not the result of a person dying and leaving a psychic imprint, non-temrinal, he shows up again and again over the hears, repeating phantasm, and hes able to go where he likes but tends to return to one specific haunt, full roaming and focused repectively. The class thing is more technical and related to types of ghosts rather then strength.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** What's more baffling is how anyone could assume the Ghostbusters were frauds after the events of the movies (and the cartoon, if you consider it canon) since by that time there have been multiple high-profile supernatural incidents witnessed by ''hundreds'' of people, many of them in very public places. Anybody denying the existence of the supernatural by that point would be a FlatEarthAtheist.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Removed This Troper


** This troper was under the impression that the ghosts from the first movie are different in nature from the ghosts of the second movie. The ghosts from the first movie (minus the Librarian) were all or mostly interdimensional beings or spirits who enter our dimension due to Gozer's increasingly weakening the borders between dimensions due to its imminent visit, whilst the ghosts from the second movie were indeed spirits of the dead resurrected due to Vigo's influence (probably as a dark magician was also a necromancer and knew how to bring back the dead, needing their energy for his purposes). And probably this troper is not the only one who thought that as it was mentioned in the commentary of Ghostbusters 2 by the guys of WebVideo/RedLetterMedia. Therefore the busting of the ghosts from the first movie were not so much avoiding dead people to move on as traping dangerous trespassers. On the second one that's another issue (but as mentioned before there's nothing preventing ghosts from moving on to the next realm while inside the unit).

to:

** This troper was under the impression It seems that the ghosts from the first movie are different in nature from the ghosts of the second movie. The ghosts from the first movie (minus the Librarian) were all or mostly interdimensional beings or spirits who enter our dimension due to Gozer's increasingly weakening the borders between dimensions due to its imminent visit, whilst the ghosts from the second movie were indeed spirits of the dead resurrected due to Vigo's influence (probably as a dark magician was also a necromancer and knew how to bring back the dead, needing their energy for his purposes). And probably this troper is not the only one who thought that as it was mentioned in the commentary of Ghostbusters 2 by the guys of WebVideo/RedLetterMedia. Therefore the busting of the ghosts from the first movie were not so much avoiding dead people to move on as traping dangerous trespassers. On the second one that's another issue (but as mentioned before there's nothing preventing ghosts from moving on to the next realm while inside the unit).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** This troper was under the impression that the ghosts from the first movie are different in nature from the ghosts of the second movie. The ghosts from the first movie (minus the Librarian) were all or mostly interdimensional beings or spirits who enter our dimension due to Gozer's increasingly weakening the borders between dimensions due to its imminent visit, whilst the ghosts from the second movie were indeed spirits of the dead resurrected due to Vigo's influence (probably as a dark magicians was also a necromancer and new how to bring back the dead, needing their energy for his purposes). And probably this troper is not the only one who thought that as it was mentioned in the commentary of Ghostbusters 2 by the guys of WebVideo/RedLetterMedia. Therefore the busting of the ghosts from the first movie were not so much avoiding dead people to move on as traping dangerous trespassers. On the second one that's another issue (but as mentioned before there's nothing preventing ghosts from moving on to the next realm while inside the unit).

to:

** This troper was under the impression that the ghosts from the first movie are different in nature from the ghosts of the second movie. The ghosts from the first movie (minus the Librarian) were all or mostly interdimensional beings or spirits who enter our dimension due to Gozer's increasingly weakening the borders between dimensions due to its imminent visit, whilst the ghosts from the second movie were indeed spirits of the dead resurrected due to Vigo's influence (probably as a dark magicians magician was also a necromancer and new knew how to bring back the dead, needing their energy for his purposes). And probably this troper is not the only one who thought that as it was mentioned in the commentary of Ghostbusters 2 by the guys of WebVideo/RedLetterMedia. Therefore the busting of the ghosts from the first movie were not so much avoiding dead people to move on as traping dangerous trespassers. On the second one that's another issue (but as mentioned before there's nothing preventing ghosts from moving on to the next realm while inside the unit).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** This troper was under the impression that the ghosts from the first movie are different in nature from the ghost of the second movie. The ghosts from the first movie (minus the Librarian) were all or mostly interdimensional beings or spirits who enter our dimension due to Gozer's increasingly weakening the borders between dimensions due to its imminent visit, whilst the ghosts from the second movie were indeed spirits of the dead resurrected due to Vigo's influence (probably as a dark magicians was also a necromancer and new how to bring back the dead, needing their energy for his purposes). And probably this troper is not the only one who thought that as it was mentioned in the commentary of Ghostbusters 2 by the guys of WebVideo/RedLetterMedia. Therefore the busting of the ghosts from the first movie were not so much avoiding dead people to move on as traping dangerous trespassers. On the second one that's another issue (but as mentioned before there's nothing preventing ghosts from moving on to the next realm while inside the unit).

to:

** This troper was under the impression that the ghosts from the first movie are different in nature from the ghost ghosts of the second movie. The ghosts from the first movie (minus the Librarian) were all or mostly interdimensional beings or spirits who enter our dimension due to Gozer's increasingly weakening the borders between dimensions due to its imminent visit, whilst the ghosts from the second movie were indeed spirits of the dead resurrected due to Vigo's influence (probably as a dark magicians was also a necromancer and new how to bring back the dead, needing their energy for his purposes). And probably this troper is not the only one who thought that as it was mentioned in the commentary of Ghostbusters 2 by the guys of WebVideo/RedLetterMedia. Therefore the busting of the ghosts from the first movie were not so much avoiding dead people to move on as traping dangerous trespassers. On the second one that's another issue (but as mentioned before there's nothing preventing ghosts from moving on to the next realm while inside the unit).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** This troper was under the impression that the ghosts from the first movie are different in nature from the ghost of the second movie. The ghosts from the first movie (minus the Librarian) were all or mostly interdimensional beings or spirits who enter our dimension due to Gozer's increasingly weakening the borders between dimensions due to its imminent visit, whilst the ghosts from the second movie were indeed spirits of the dead resurrected due to Vigo's influence (probably as a dark magicians was also a necromancer and new how to bring back the dead, needing their energy for his purposes). And probably this troper is not the only one who thought that as it was mentioned in the commentary of Ghostbusters 2 by the guys of WebVideo/RedLetterMedia. Therefore the busting of the ghosts from the first movie were not so much avoiding dead people to move on as traping dangerous trespassers. On the second one that's another issue (but as mentioned before there's nothing preventing ghosts from moving on to the next realm while inside the unit).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Also, come on. This is absurd. The movie is unarguably pro-capitalism, but to suggest that it takes place in a pure unfettered Reaganite wet-dream is just pure ax-grinding. There is clearly a regulatory framework at play in this film, and it is clearly supposed to be set in more-or-less "our" reality, it just stretches things so that the heroes can operate as all stories do. We can critique the politics of the movie without going to ridiculous extremes about it.

to:

*** Also, come on. This is absurd. The movie is unarguably pro-capitalism, but to suggest that it takes place in a pure unfettered Reaganite wet-dream is just pure baseless ax-grinding. There is clearly a regulatory framework at play in this film, and it is clearly supposed to be set in more-or-less "our" reality, it just stretches things so that the heroes can operate as all stories do. We can critique the politics of the movie without going to ridiculous extremes about it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Headscratchers/GhostbustersAfterlife''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** it’s really nothing like the police arresting criminals. For a start, most criminals are eventually set free.

to:

** *** it’s really nothing like the police arresting criminals. For a start, most criminals are eventually set free.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** it’s really nothing like the police arresting criminals. For a start, most criminals are eventually set free.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** If you look closely at Peter and Egon's body language during the scene where they give the hotel manager the bill, you'll realize that Peter is deliberately pulling those numbers out of his ass because the manager was rude to them. That probably isn't an indicator of what they usually charge. In fact, since that was their first job, they may not have entirely figured out their pricing model yet.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Headscratchers/GhostbustersAfterlife''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Likely they tailor the fees to the customer. The Sedgewick can obviously afford the five thousand, but residential customers likely get reduced rates and payment plans. This is something that other service companies like plumbing, pest control, and mechanics are often accused of in real life.

Changed: 50

Removed: 6247

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
moved examples specific to first film to separate page


* I know Ray Stantz said to Peter Venkman, "Don't move it won't hurt you.", when staring at Slimer. But why didn't Peter Venkman RUN when Slimer came after him? Ray's advice be damned. Peter wasn't exactly trapped in a Dead End and could have easily turned the corner right behind him. Taking a few steps back then just standing there screaming is not exactly escaping a slime bath.
** He was paralyzed with fear. Apart from the librarian, that was the first ghost Peter had ever seen, and this time he was all alone with it. He just lucked out in that the ghost happened to be, well, Slimer.
** Run where? Slimer is clearly faster than any human being ''and'' can pass right through solid matter. Where could Venkman possibly hide from him?



* When Venkman and Peck first meet, why didn't Venkman just show Peck the containment facility? If it was just Peck and Venkman, no cops or electricians, Venkman could have just bullshat his way through explaining that it was safe and Peck would have a much harder time convincing anyone else that he had probable cause to prosecute.
** Because while Peck might have a point about his concerns about the containment facility, Peter ''also'' has a point that this guy has no right -- legal or general -- to suddenly appear in his life and start arrogantly throwing his weight around making demands and threats. Plus, considering how Peck later shouted down the Con-Ed guy who was also making noises about how it might not be safe to shut it down, chances are showing Peck around might have strengthened his convictions to get everything shut down; he's not exactly an open-minded guy.
** The novelization states that Peter was exhausted from multiple shifts of ghostbusting and lost his temper.
** In addition, Peck is apparently not aware that "magic word" means "please" until explicitly told so. Even then, his tone of voice when he says "please" doesn't exactly scream "polite and considerate". Peter likely thought that he was an asshole and there was no reason to humor the guy whatsoever.
** While Venkman probably could / should have just bitten the bullet and let Peck take a quick look (if only to get him off their backs for a while), Peck doesn't exactly conduct himself in a way that's calculated to win Venkman over. Chances are, had the EPA sent around a pretty woman, or even just a more reasonable guy who wasn't a total dickhead, Venkman would have had no problem showing off the containment grid (or at least would have probably framed his refusal in a more diplomatic, less confrontational way). His issue seemed to be more with Peck being a pompous jerk rather than opening up the Ghostbusters facilities to inspection.
** Even in the film, Venkman is clearly exhausted and in no mood to put up with bull. His coping mechanism for stress is humor, and Peck turns out to be the perfect target for Peter's brand of jerkassery. And Peck isn't the kind of guy to respond well to that, and takes personal offense. And of course, Peter was highly offended by Peck right off the bat. "Exactly what are you a doctor of, ''Mr.'' Venkman?" Not using a person's proper salutation is a really good way to get on their bad side, and Peter wasn't about to take Peck's dismissal lying down. As has been pointed out, if Peter had been in a better mood, had Peck been less of a jerk, the whole thing could have been settled amicably (well, up until Peter got to the unlicensed nuclear accelerators, at any rate).

* The question always bothered me: how did Vinz Clortho know "the signal" would have been the release of the ghosts from Ghostbusters central. Could he read the future ?!?
** No, you're misunderstanding it completely. He didn't know, in advance, that the signal would be that exact event. He was waiting for a signal, any signal, which would mean Gozer was returning. I'd say the huge plume of ghosts exploding out of one place and going on to rampage throughout the city can be pretty easily interpreted as such a signal.
** When he's talking to the horse, he says something like, "Soon all our prisoners will be released," which could only refer to the containment unit. Maybe if Peck hadn't shut it down, the ghosts would have escaped soon anyway.
** Maybe he ''could'' read the future. However incompetent Gozer may have been (his servants certainly were--judging from Vinz's antics with the horse and at the firehouse, and that Zuul didn't even seem to recognize Peter was the same man who'd just said he wasn't the Keymaster or understand what he was doing since she (?) let Peter inject Dana, they had the intelligence of dogs or less as well as the appearance), he was still a god. Deities tend to have divinatory powers, and one who was summoned periodically to destroy a world would need to be able to see the future to know when the time was right and all prophecies/rituals had been fulfilled.
*** To be fair, the fact that Zuul can't tell that Peter is the same guy who just said he wasn't the Keymaster may not indicate incompetence so much as foreignness. Remember, Zuul is some sort of demon-dog from another dimension. When they were still in dog form, could you tell the difference between Zuul and Vinz Clortho? They probably can't tell the difference between human beings either. They may also have a different sense of time, so from Zuul's perspective, the fact that sometime after a human who said he wasn't the Keymaster left, another human who said he was the Keymaster arrived. Did they look alike? Well, all humans look alike to them. How much time passed? Hard to say, time passes differently here. They also might not exactly know who the dominant species on our world is. The horse was larger and in front, so maybe Vinz just assumed that he must be the one in charge.
*** Also, the demon-dogs possess people. For all Zuul knew, Vinz Clortho could've jumped Peter the second the door was shut and taken over his body.
** New theory - Zuul was told to wait for Clortho, Clortho was told that he had to find Zuul and that the sign would be a pillar of light and that "all prisoners will be released." However, he didn't know the context - the containment field being shut down and the ghosts busting loose. He knew ''what'' would happen, just not where or when it would happen.



* One thing that's bothered me since I was a kid: how do the busters ''avoid'' crossing the streams? Have you '''seen''' those things? I'm not even sure how they ''aim'' with the beams lashing every which way.

to:

* One thing that's bothered me since I was a kid: how How do the busters ''avoid'' crossing the streams? Have you '''seen''' those things? I'm not even sure how they ''aim'' with the beams lashing every which way.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


* How do they manage to have a sustainable business whatsoever with the fees they charge? Several thousand dollars to trap a ghost- which even the Sedgewick Hotel thought was ludicrous to pay, how are private citizens going to come close to paying? It's not as if there is any insurance that would come close to covering such matters, and if someone without insurance or funds is likely to refuse medical care when they absolutely need it, someone scraping by on minimum wage isn't going to call to have a ghost removed. Furthermore the cartoon made it clear that, despite the hefty fees they charge, they still barely make enough to show a tiny profit, if at all, due to the insane operating costs(the ECU alone probably reaches the 5-digit mark on a monthly electric bill).

*So, nuclear power cells in the proton packs... where did they get it? What happens if a pack is badly damaged? Or stolen(this did happen in ''WesternAnimation/ExtremeGhostbusters'')? In hindsight the proton packs seem to be incredibly dangerous without proper R&D going into their creation, coupled with the likelihood they engaged in some "Doc Brown" type illegal dealings to get the material. Venkman's words highly suggest they told no one what these packs were made with. Plus the mere possibility of killing someone if the beams- which are somewhat hard to control- accidentally grazes a bystander.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Well, that and the fact that there was enough going on without the plot slamming to a halt so that someone could painstakingly explain the long-term safety considerations of the fictional devices of a team of ghost hunters. While the politics of the movie are certainly open to critique, not everything about it is a result of pure fanatical Reaganism.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Also, come on. This is absurd. The movie is unarguably pro-capitalism, but to suggest that it takes place in a pure unfettered Reaganite wet-dream is just pure ax-grinding. There is clearly a regulatory framework at play in this film, and it is clearly supposed to be set in more-or-less "our" reality, it just stretches things so that the heroes can operate as all stories do. We can critique the politics of the movie without going to ridiculous extremes about it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**** Mankind has in fact discovered how to do this (by using the waste in different "fast reactors"), but it's rarely talked about because various entities have an interest in promoting fear of nuclear reactors, and the mental imagery of leaking barrels of glowing poison is very valuable in doing so.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** What Non-terminal most likely means is that Slimer is a repeat performer if you will. Slimer isn't a terminal apparition and thus does not cease to exist once whatever he's trying to do is done. Unlike say more humanoid ghosts that cease to be when whatever is holding them to the world is complete Slimer is a force of raw emotion without specific goals that could be completed only a base motivation he'll seek to fulfill. In this case one of gluttony where his base motivation is gorging himself in every way he possibly can.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Saying that "in that universe things are different" is the same as saying AWizardDidIt, all movies are suppose to happen in our universe except for the obvious alternate history plots.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Ultimately, this one's just basic RuleOfCool. In the real world, the Ghostbusters might not be allowed to use blue emergency lights... but damn if Ecto-1 doesn't look cool with blue emergency lights going, so the filmmakers used blue lights under the (not entirely unreasonable) assumption that most of the watching audience didn't, wouldn't and don't care about official New York county and state emergency vehicle regulations when it comes to fictional depictions of ghosts and the busting thereof.

Changed: 216

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Assuming you take the IDW comics as canon, its just really, really bright. Painfully bright. Winston looked into one on his first night on the job, and aside from rubbing his eyes afterwards he was perfectly fine.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Headscratchers/GhostbustersAfterlife''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Agreed. They are made of ectoplasm, a spiritual substance formed from powerful emotions. Much like the constructs from GreenLantern, most of the ghosts can be thought of as just wild animals formed from concentrations of emotions in an area. Given that they are made of powerful emotions, they probably act to increase powerful emotions in the area in order to feed. And what's a powerful emotion? Fear.

to:

*** Agreed. They are made of ectoplasm, a spiritual substance formed from powerful emotions. Much like the constructs from GreenLantern, Franchise/GreenLantern, most of the ghosts can be thought of as just wild animals formed from concentrations of emotions in an area. Given that they are made of powerful emotions, they probably act to increase powerful emotions in the area in order to feed. And what's a powerful emotion? Fear.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** The Ghostbusters didn't ''create'' the ghosts, they only incapacitated them as best they could. The ghosts were all loose and causing trouble in New York before they were trapped. Sure, it'd be a lot better if they could finish the darn things off permanently or shunt them into some other dimension, but just because it's not a ''permanent'' solution doesn't mean it's not a major improvement over having the city's libraries and hotels continually trashed, to say nothing of whatever the more actively-brutal ghosts might've been up to.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Given how this is a universe where the good guys are pure capitalists, and the bad guys are regulatory bodies, it's likely that either the laws simply aren't as strict, having been written by "good guys". Or, that the good guys who would enforce such things simply allow the Ghostbusters to slide on this law, because they recognize fellow good guys and understand that the law must often be left unenforced for the greater good.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


!!Specific films:

to:

!!Specific films:works:

Top