Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / DisneyFairies

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The Scout fairies' wooden spears in ''[=NeverBeast=]'' look quite impressive at scale, but they're essentially no larger, and therefore no more sturdy, than toothpicks. How effective is a toothpick going to be in fending off a full-grown hawk?

to:

* The Scout fairies' wooden spears in ''[=NeverBeast=]'' look quite impressive at scale, but they're essentially no larger, and therefore no more sturdy, than toothpicks. How effective is a toothpick going to be in fending off a full-grown hawk?hawk?
* When exactly do the ''Tinker Bell'' films take place? Wendy appeared in the first film (albeit much younger than in ''Peter Pan''), yet Peter Pan never appears despite (presumably) being older than Wendy. Also, if I'm not mistaken, the ''Tinker Bell'' films are meant to be prequels to Peter Pan and take place before Tink met Peter. So in the original ''Peter Pan'', Peter hadn't been living in Never Land for very long?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Perhaps Lizzy and Tink aren't the first fairy-human friendship. There could be a conspiracy involving fairy-friendly humans churning out fairy "fiction" to maintain the masquerade and to avoid, for example, curious adults from going out to try to catch fairy specimens to display in museums and zoos.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Zarina probably made some Sewing or Tinker Talent dust and made the outfit herself; looks like some of the stuff she packed before leaving could have been ingredients for that. She's clearly quite resourceful; as Fairy Gary said, she's "The Tinker Bell of Dust Keepers." Or maybe she stole it from somebody's doll; James says fairies are 6" tall, which is conveniently the same 1:12 scale to humans as many dolls.

to:

** Zarina probably made some Sewing or Tinker Talent dust and made the outfit herself; looks like some of the stuff she packed before leaving could have been ingredients for that. She's clearly quite resourceful; as Fairy Gary said, she's "The Tinker Bell of Dust Keepers." Or maybe she stole it from somebody's doll; James says fairies are 6" tall, which is conveniently the same 1:12 scale to humans as many dolls.dolls.
* The Scout fairies' wooden spears in ''[=NeverBeast=]'' look quite impressive at scale, but they're essentially no larger, and therefore no more sturdy, than toothpicks. How effective is a toothpick going to be in fending off a full-grown hawk?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Zarina probably made some Sewing or Tinker Talent dust and made the outfit herself; looks like some of the stuff she packed before leaving could have been ingredients for that. She's clearly quite resourceful; as Fairy Gary said, she's "The Tinker Bell of Dust Keeper Fairies."

to:

** Zarina probably made some Sewing or Tinker Talent dust and made the outfit herself; looks like some of the stuff she packed before leaving could have been ingredients for that. She's clearly quite resourceful; as Fairy Gary said, she's "The Tinker Bell of Dust Keeper Fairies."Keepers." Or maybe she stole it from somebody's doll; James says fairies are 6" tall, which is conveniently the same 1:12 scale to humans as many dolls.

Added: 955

Changed: 482

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Since Zarina mentioned it...just ''why'' does Pixie Dust only make things float/fly when it's sprinkled (or, in a few cases, suggestively rubbed) on something? It pours from the tree into the pouch or the reservoir on the boat's masthead, but nothing floats until the sprinkling commences. The writers did a good job of maintaining MagicAIsMagicA, but no explanation other than "That's just how Pixie Dust works." Seems the entire Dust Keepers' Guild runs on ApathyKilledTheCat.

to:

* Humans don't age in Neverland. How did James age between the events of ''The Pirate Fairy'' and ''Peter and Wendy''?
* Since Zarina mentioned it...just ''why'' does Pixie Dust only make things float/fly when it's sprinkled (or, in a few cases, suggestively rubbed) on something? It pours from the tree into the pouch or the reservoir on the boat's masthead, but nothing floats until the sprinkling commences. The writers did a good job of maintaining MagicAIsMagicA, MagicAIsMagicA,[[note]]ignoring the fact that the sifting procedure within the Pixie Dust Tree involves a lot of sprinkling, and none of that machinery floats[[/note]] but no explanation other than "That's just how Pixie Dust works." Seems the entire Dust Keepers' Guild runs on ApathyKilledTheCat.


Added DiffLines:

** They may have seen them in the London Zoo, which opened in 1847 - four decades before the events of the original book. Alternatively, it's possible that every star visible from Neverland is a portal to a different part of the human world; the Second Star to the Right is just their favorite because CreatorProvincialism.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** In ''The Secret of the Wings'', Queen Clarion says that Pixie Hollow "was very young" when she and Milori fell in love. Perhaps Gruff isn't always successful and failed to protect Pixie Hollow the last time the comet came and they had to rebuild. Human societies are replete with periods of lost knowledge; for example, Aristarchus postulated a heliocentric model of the solar system that was forgotten until the time of Copernicus. Is it such a stretch to imagine that Fairy society may face similar setbacks?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In The Pirate Fairy, where did Zarina's pirate outfit come from? It doesn't seem like the pirates would have enough skill to make a fairy-sized piece of clothing so elaborate.

to:

* In The Pirate Fairy, where did Zarina's pirate outfit come from? It doesn't seem like the pirates would have enough skill to make a fairy-sized piece of clothing so elaborate.elaborate.
** Zarina probably made some Sewing or Tinker Talent dust and made the outfit herself; looks like some of the stuff she packed before leaving could have been ingredients for that. She's clearly quite resourceful; as Fairy Gary said, she's "The Tinker Bell of Dust Keeper Fairies."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Since Zarina mentioned it...just ''why'' does Pixie Dust only make things float/fly when it's sprinkled (or, in a few cases, suggestively rubbed) on something? It pours from the tree into the pouch or the reservoir on the boat's masthead, but nothing floats until the sprinkling commences. The writers did a good job of maintaining MagicAIsMagicA, but no explanation other than "That's just how Pixie Dust works." Seems the entire Dust Keepers' Guild runs on ApathyKilledTheCat.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Pretty much all of them did. She wasn't banished for tampering with the dust, she was just fired, and she was friendly with everyone she passed in the opening scene of the film; her departure was a SelfImposedExile. The scene before she hit the Core Six with the power swapping dust had strong "we used to be friends" overtones, and they never stopped trying to bring her back around to their side.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In ''Fairy Dust & The Quest For The Egg'', Captain Hook cannot see the fairies because he is an adult. (According to Gail Carson Levine adults cannot see fairies.) Whut? A ''major plot point'' in Disney's continuity depended on adults being able to see fairies - it was Tinker Bell who betrayed the location of Peter Pan's hideout to Captain Hook, and he obviously had no trouble seeing her.

to:

* In ''Fairy Dust & The Quest For The Egg'', Captain Hook cannot see the fairies because he is an adult. (According to Gail Carson Levine adults cannot see fairies.) Whut? What? A ''major plot point'' in Disney's continuity depended on adults being able to see fairies - it was Tinker Bell who betrayed the location of Peter Pan's hideout to Captain Hook, and he obviously had no trouble seeing her.



** In "Fairy Dust and The Quest For The Egg" it's directly stated that fairies can't fly with wet wings because it makes them too heavy.



* In ''The Legend of the [=NeverBeast=]'', how do the fairies know about hippos (Nyx mentions them to Fawn) and monkeys (Fawn mimicks one)?

to:

* In ''The Legend of the [=NeverBeast=]'', how do the fairies know about hippos (Nyx mentions them to Fawn) and monkeys (Fawn mimicks one)?one)?
* In The Pirate Fairy, where did Zarina's pirate outfit come from? It doesn't seem like the pirates would have enough skill to make a fairy-sized piece of clothing so elaborate.

Changed: 27

Removed: 5805

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Possible FridgeBrilliance? Isn't it said/implied at the end of ''Lost Treasure'' that this is one of the largest amounts of pixie dust to be made at one time? "Over a million smidges IIRC". Maybe because there's a little extra, the fairies going to the mainland get extra pixie dust since they're going to be leaving Pixie Hollow.
* Why is the art in this so.. ''good'' compared to other CGI productions, especially for this demographic? Did someone dig up the Peter Pan artbooks or something? There's none of the typical major facial deformity utilized in everything else done in CG since ''WesternAnimation/ReBoot'' (Tangled aside, maybe it's a Disney thing?)
** Creator/JohnLasseter is the exec producer of all the Disney Fairies stuff. That tells you everything you need to know.

to:

** Possible FridgeBrilliance? Isn't it said/implied at the end of ''Lost Treasure'' that this is one of the largest amounts of pixie dust to be made at one time? "Over a million smidges IIRC". Maybe because there's a little extra, the fairies going to the mainland get extra pixie dust since they're going to be leaving Pixie Hollow.
* Why is the art in this so.. ''good'' compared to other CGI productions, especially for this demographic? Did someone dig up the Peter Pan artbooks or something? There's none of the typical major facial deformity utilized in everything else done in CG since ''WesternAnimation/ReBoot'' (Tangled aside, maybe it's a Disney thing?)
** Creator/JohnLasseter is the exec producer of all the Disney Fairies stuff. That tells you everything you need to know.
Hollow.



* Does anyone else feel that these movies could be seen as teaching...somewhat ambiguous messages to kids? For example, at least two or three of them have the main character(s) do something that's frowned upon and/or downright against the rules. This ends up making a big mess, which the character(s) has/have to fix, and in the end, they're basically commended or rewarded for doing nothing more than cleaning up messes they made themselves. Tink wants to go to the mainland, is told she can't, tries anyway, makes a mess of springtime, fixes it, and gets to go to the mainland. Fawn begins looking after a creature that's thought of as dangerous to the other fairies, is told she can't, tries anyway, causes a huge misunderstanding, fixes it, and everyone in the end admits that they were wrong and she was right. Tink tries to spend time with her sister by crossing the border to be with her, is told she can't tries anyway, wash, rinse, and repeat. And don't even get me started on ''Zarina''. Turns against the fairies just because they wouldn't let her conduct all of her dangerous dust experiments, steals the blue dust, while ''knowing'' that the fairies' lifestyle will be jeopardized without it, allows the pirates to get their hands on it, only switches back to the good side after she'd been betrayed by them, and gets accepted back into Pixie Hollow in the end without even so much as a scolding, if I remember correctly. Does anyone see what I mean here?
** Characters fixing the messes they cause has also been a frequent theme in other recent Disney animated movies such as ''WesternAnimation/WreckItRalph'' and ''WesternAnimation/{{Frozen|2013}}''. The key here is that they take responsibility for their mistakes. I believe it is to show kids that no one is perfect and that they will sometimes make poor choices. When this happens, the best thing to do is apologize and make amends. The idea of redemption and second chances is reassuring for everyone, especially young children.
** Except Elsa didn't do anything on purpose that set an endless winter upon her kingdom. She was just fearful and upset, and she isn't really ''rewarded'', anyway, so much as the people begin to accept and not fear her. And while your point about Ralph deserves some credit, he still didn't end up getting what he wanted in the first place, and the Nicelanders had a lesson to learn, too, so it wasn't entirely his fault. Here in these movies, the only blame that can be pinned on the other fairies is, perhaps, not thinking outside the box enough and accepting different ways of doing things, and most of the time, this doesn't even stem from maliciousness - they just do it that way because it's how it's always been done or because it helps to keep people safe.
** I personally don’t see anything wrong with themes that encourage kids to think outside the proverbial box and explore their creativity. History is filled with examples of people who came up with great inventions and changed unjust laws by challenging the status quo.In Zarina’s case, fixing her mistake earned her ''forgiveness''. When she was rewarded at the end, it was because the other fairies had come to appreciate her talent. This paralleled what happened with Tinker Bell in earlier movies. Her inventions, which were initially frowned upon, actually helped improve Pixie Hollow. Since Zarina has only appeared in ''Pirate Fairy'', the potential contributions she’ll make with Pixie Dust Alchemy were mostly just hinted at, although they have been explored in fanfics. As you pointed out, Zarina is an interesting case since, unlike these other examples, her “mistake” was a serious crime with malicious intent. This does bring up several thought-provoking questions, which any concerned parents ought to discuss with their kids: Even though Zarina eventually saw the error of her ways, apologized, and fixed her mistake, was that enough? Should she still have been punished? If so, in what way? How do you think the story would have turned out if the pirates hadn’t betrayed her? In real world terms, do you think repentant criminals should be given second chances and rewarded for their achievements? How might Zarina have better handled the situation when she was fired as a dust-keeper instead of running away and joining a “bad crowd?” This is just a sampling of what could be discussed. It shows why it is important that parents not just passively watch movies with their kids, but talk about them afterwards.
** While we’re on this topic, what about Tinker Bell in the original ''WesternAnimation/PeterPan''? Schemes to have Wendy ''murdered'' in a fit of jealousy, is furious when her plan is foiled, and gleefully admits what she attempted without a hint of remorse. Later she is tricked by Captain Hook into revealing Peter Pan's hiding place. And Tink has been a major Disney icon even well before they softened her up for these movies. Perhaps fairies in Never Land are just EasilyForgiven.
*** It is implied in the sequel that Tink's somewhat undergone character development since the events of the first movie, still doing things here and there to torment Jane but never going as far as killing her, and even allowing a grown-up Wendy a brief lift into the air...though, the ''Disney Fairies'' films ''do'' seem to take place ''before'' the first movie, as well, so...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Alternatively, other fairies who are also artists could have made them, and she was a fan who got them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** My guess is that while fairy wings always have fairy dust on them, if they're washed off then there's just not enough dust to fly with.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Characters fixing the messes they cause has also been a frequent theme in other recent Disney animated movies such as ''Disney/{{Wreck It Ralph}}'' and ''Disney/{{Frozen}}''. The key here is that they take responsibility for their mistakes. I believe it is to show kids that no one is perfect and that they will sometimes make poor choices. When this happens, the best thing to do is apologize and make amends. The idea of redemption and second chances is reassuring for everyone, especially young children.

to:

** Characters fixing the messes they cause has also been a frequent theme in other recent Disney animated movies such as ''Disney/{{Wreck It Ralph}}'' ''WesternAnimation/WreckItRalph'' and ''Disney/{{Frozen}}''.''WesternAnimation/{{Frozen|2013}}''. The key here is that they take responsibility for their mistakes. I believe it is to show kids that no one is perfect and that they will sometimes make poor choices. When this happens, the best thing to do is apologize and make amends. The idea of redemption and second chances is reassuring for everyone, especially young children.



** While we’re on this topic, what about Tinker Bell in the original ''Disney/PeterPan''? Schemes to have Wendy ''murdered'' in a fit of jealousy, is furious when her plan is foiled, and gleefully admits what she attempted without a hint of remorse. Later she is tricked by Captain Hook into revealing Peter Pan's hiding place. And Tink has been a major Disney icon even well before they softened her up for these movies. Perhaps fairies in Never Land are just EasilyForgiven.

to:

** While we’re on this topic, what about Tinker Bell in the original ''Disney/PeterPan''? ''WesternAnimation/PeterPan''? Schemes to have Wendy ''murdered'' in a fit of jealousy, is furious when her plan is foiled, and gleefully admits what she attempted without a hint of remorse. Later she is tricked by Captain Hook into revealing Peter Pan's hiding place. And Tink has been a major Disney icon even well before they softened her up for these movies. Perhaps fairies in Never Land are just EasilyForgiven.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Why is the art in this so.. ''good'' compared to other CGI productions, especially for this demographic? Did someone dig up the Peter Pan artbooks or something? There's none of the typical major facial deformity utilized in everything else done in CG since ReBoot (Tangled aside, maybe it's a Disney thing?)

to:

* Why is the art in this so.. ''good'' compared to other CGI productions, especially for this demographic? Did someone dig up the Peter Pan artbooks or something? There's none of the typical major facial deformity utilized in everything else done in CG since ReBoot ''WesternAnimation/ReBoot'' (Tangled aside, maybe it's a Disney thing?)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Relating to the above about the Neverbeast, wouldn't Queen Clarion have known that Nyx's interpretation of the parchment was incorrect? I know a lot of details about certain things are bound to be lost as time passes, but surely, the fairies would've known if their world had been wiped out 1,000 years ago. If they think that's the ultimate goal of the Neverbeast, why wouldn't they have records of it happening before?

to:

* Relating to the above about the Neverbeast, wouldn't Queen Clarion have known that Nyx's interpretation of the parchment was incorrect? I know a lot of details about certain things are bound to be lost as time passes, but surely, the fairies would've known if their world had been wiped out 1,000 years ago. If they think that's the ultimate goal of the Neverbeast, why wouldn't they have records of it happening before?before?
* In ''The Legend of the [=NeverBeast=]'', how do the fairies know about hippos (Nyx mentions them to Fawn) and monkeys (Fawn mimicks one)?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** On top of all that, no one ever considered that Zarina and Hook were faking the whole thing in order to get the dust back. They're lucky Hook had pulled an actual betrayal that got Zarina back on their side for the climax, when for all they knew, she was in on the plan to begin with.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Maybe, maybe not. But it's better than writing nothing down at all. And besides, even as old languages have evolved, we've still been able to translate them - it's worth noting that the picture Nyx found didn't have any writing on it at all.

to:

** Maybe, maybe not. But it's better than writing nothing down at all. And besides, even as old languages have evolved, we've still been able to translate them - it's worth noting that the picture Nyx found didn't have any writing on it at all.all.
* Relating to the above about the Neverbeast, wouldn't Queen Clarion have known that Nyx's interpretation of the parchment was incorrect? I know a lot of details about certain things are bound to be lost as time passes, but surely, the fairies would've known if their world had been wiped out 1,000 years ago. If they think that's the ultimate goal of the Neverbeast, why wouldn't they have records of it happening before?

Top