Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / DieHard2

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

***The line exists to emphasize the weapons they’re using are far more advanced than a civilian could get. Considering this was a secret mercenary group, it’s not impossible in the Die Hard universe they’d have access to more advanced guns.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Why does Colonel Stuart specify that he wants a 747 cargo conversion for his escape? The 'plane ends up carrying nothing but passengers (luckily there are enough seats for them all). Does the freighter version have some advantage over a standard configuration?

Added: 273

Changed: 1

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Esperanza is a Dictator. Taking him in is a major coup for the U.S. Government. No doubt they were planning to perp walk him in public. But, that still doesn't explain why they didn't use Andrews, which would've been much more secure and gotten the same media coverage.



* I know that security was decidely more lenient pre-9/11, but I'm still positive that they would not have let anybody bring an electric stun-gun on to a plane. In fact, from ''Film/DieHard'', it would have been pretty hard for John to bring his gun on the plane, without having to check it, regardless of the fact that he is a cop (When a cop is off-duty, they're essentially a civilian).

to:

* I know that security was decidely decidedly more lenient pre-9/11, but I'm still positive that they would not have let anybody bring an electric stun-gun on to a plane. In fact, from ''Film/DieHard'', it would have been pretty hard for John to bring his gun on the plane, without having to check it, regardless of the fact that he is a cop (When a cop is off-duty, they're essentially a civilian).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Likely because they didn't know how many men and guns Stuart had, and for all they knew the emergency vehicles would be blown to smithereens by RPG fire before they could land more than one or two planes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Honestly, I think McClane was just screwing with the security guard when he threw that out there, to try and make him realize just how serious the situation really was.

to:

** Honestly, I think McClane [=McClane=] was just screwing with the security guard when he threw that out there, to try and make him realize just how serious the situation really was.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Why didn't the heroes just use emergency vehicles with their lights flashing to guide the planes in on the runways?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

***The SWAT team most likely had vest on. However, people don't realize that vest only stop just a few rounds at most. Look up any company that sells bulletproof vest and read what the descriptions say. Most will state they will stop 9, 40, 45, 357, and 44 magnum. They never state those vest will stop a full magazine full of those bullets, let alone fully automatic weapons as well.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Why did no one even try to see if the planes could be landed at any Air Force base near DC? Yes, they're supposed to be off limits to civilian aircraft, but this is a terrorist scenario that would have gotten the attention of some high-ranking people who could have ordered the bases to prepare to land the aircraft - or at least try to communicate with the pilots to let them know what was really going on.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Honestly, I think McClane was just screwing with the security guard when he threw that out there, to try and make him realize just how serious the situation really was.

Changed: 220

Removed: 131

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Those Glock 7 guns. We all know guns without metal parts don't exist, but even if they did, wouldn't the bullets inside the gun trigger a metal detector.

to:

* Those Glock 7 guns. We all know guns without metal parts don't exist, but even if they did, wouldn't the bullets inside the gun trigger a metal detector.detector?



** The same reason that there isn't a gun without metal parts in real life, it's the only effective material (assuming you want the person you're shooting at to actually die - plastic won't cut it)

to:

** The same reason that there isn't a gun without metal parts in real life, it's the only effective material (assuming you want the person you're shooting at to actually die - plastic won't cut it)it).



*** As well he should, since "guns invisible to X-rays" have become a recurrent boogeyman of anti-gun rights groups based almost entirely off of the claims of a ceramic gun in ''Die Hard 2'' (Nowadays there is a federal law stating any commercially available gun must contain enough metal to set off an airport metal detector. They're now (2013) considering revising that law to also state that the metal must be sufficiently distributed in the gun so that it can't be removed without rendering it nonfunctional). And people complain about the effect ''Series/{{TwentyFour}}'' has had on the torture debate...

to:

*** As well he should, since "guns invisible to X-rays" have become a recurrent boogeyman of anti-gun rights groups based almost entirely off of the claims of a ceramic gun in ''Die Hard 2'' (Nowadays there is a federal law stating any commercially available gun must contain enough metal to set off an airport metal detector. They're now (2013) As of 2013, they were considering revising that law to also state that the metal must be sufficiently distributed in the gun so that it can't be removed without rendering it nonfunctional). And people complain about the effect ''Series/{{TwentyFour}}'' ''Series/TwentyFour'' has had on the torture debate...



* I know that security was decidely more lenient pre-9/11, but I'm still positive that they would not have let anybody bring an electric stun-gun on to a plane. In fact, from ''Die Hard'', it would have been pretty hard for John to bring his gun on the plane, without having to check it, regardless of the fact that he is a cop (When a cop is off-duty, they're essentially a civilian).

to:

* I know that security was decidely more lenient pre-9/11, but I'm still positive that they would not have let anybody bring an electric stun-gun on to a plane. In fact, from ''Die Hard'', ''Film/DieHard'', it would have been pretty hard for John to bring his gun on the plane, without having to check it, regardless of the fact that he is a cop (When a cop is off-duty, they're essentially a civilian).



* How do they reconcile the fact that John's wife's plane had 90 minutes of fuel left and was circling around DC...and thus had over a dozen alternate airfields that it would have automatically diverted to if it have no communication with the tower?

to:

* How do they reconcile the fact that John's wife's Holly's plane had 90 minutes of fuel left and was circling around DC...and thus had over a dozen alternate airfields that it would have automatically diverted to if it have no communication with the tower?




** wouldn't the bad guys simply just have jammed that frequency? and any other frequency they might be using to contact the planes?

to:

\n** wouldn't Wouldn't the bad guys simply just have jammed that frequency? and And any other frequency they might be using to contact the planes?



* John [=McClane=] pulls out a machine gun and starts to spray the police chief right in front of a bunch of other cops! And not one of them shoots him down! [[spoiler:OK, they were blanks, but the other cops had no way of knowing that...]]

to:

* John [=McClane=] pulls out a machine gun and starts to spray the police chief Lorenzo right in front of a bunch of other cops! And not one of them shoots him down! [[spoiler:OK, they were blanks, but the other cops had no way of knowing that...]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* How could the same shit happen to the same guy twice?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Not to mention that the plane was almost out of fuel. Even a fully fueled airliner will burn, not explode, on a bad crash landing. The Windsor jet shouldn't even have caught fire.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** There is no way the plane would have made it out of the country without being spotted on radar, and airports everywhere would be on the lookout for its transponder signal. You can't just fly a plane in, across, or out of a developed country without air traffic control somewhere knowing about it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Is it possible to the Windsor airliner to crash in the circumstances depicted? Even with the ILS magically lowered 200 feet, the aircraft was descending on a glideslope (vertical speed probably around 800-900 fpm), full flaps and gear down, at around 130 knots (151 mph). Even without the flare (raising the nose at a last moment to reduce vertical speed and to allow a gentler touchdown), it's far more likely to be a hard landing, not a crash. (And the pilot might try to pull the nose up at the last second anyway.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** There's also the fact that the plane was running low on fuel and had to land ASAP for this very reason, and yet there's still so much fuel that the crash causes an explosion this huge?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


** wouldn't the bad guys simply just have jammed that frequency? and any other frequency they might be using to contact the planes?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
There is no reason that John would be trying to bullshit him on this, and doing so would be detrimental to John's position in every conceivable way.


*** Considering the chemistry between McClane and the obstructive airport security official, it's easy to interpret the scene as McClane simply trying to bullshit said official, who obviously wasn't the sharpest tool in the shed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Considering the chemistry between McClane and the obstructive airport security official, it's easy to interpret the scene as McClane simply trying to bullshit said official, who obviously wasn't the sharpest tool in the shed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** The fact that they lost communications with the planes in the first place is pure PlotHole. [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aircraft_emergency_frequency There is a specific frequency band used solely for aviation emergencies]]. Every aviation radio in the world is designed to be able to use this channel, and every commercial aircraft is required to listen in on that frequency at all times while in flight. Our heroes could have broadcast in clear to all the planes circling Dulles from any transmitter in radio range that could operate on guard frequency (such as, oh, the one at Andrews Air Force Base, which would entirely make this transmission on behalf of the police and be able to authenticate their bona fides besides), and all it takes to get aircraft diverting to nearby airfields is one simple transmission -- "Dulles International Airport is closed due to a terrorist incident in-progress that has seized the air-traffic-control tower. Disregard all transmissions claiming to be from Dulles Approach and divert to other airfields immediately.".

to:

*** The fact that they lost communications with the planes in the first place is pure PlotHole. [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aircraft_emergency_frequency There is a specific frequency band used solely for aviation emergencies]]. Every aviation radio in the world is designed to be able to use this channel, and every commercial aircraft is required to listen in on that frequency at all times while in flight. Our heroes could have broadcast in the clear to all the planes circling Dulles from any transmitter in radio range that could operate on guard frequency (such as, oh, the one at Andrews Air Force Base, which would entirely make this transmission on behalf of the police and be able to authenticate their bona fides besides), and all it takes to get aircraft diverting to nearby airfields is one simple transmission -- "Dulles International Airport is closed due to a terrorist incident in-progress that has seized the air-traffic-control tower. Disregard all transmissions claiming to be from Dulles Approach and divert to other airfields immediately.".



** Yeah, they're simply not expecting an attack at all (John ''is'' a fellow cop, after all, and they're safe back in the office at this time, not in a potential danger zone), and by the time their reflexes catch up with what's going on, the realization that [[spoiler:John was firing blanks]] has also caught up with them.

to:

** Yeah, they're simply not expecting an attack at all (John ''is'' a fellow cop, after all, and they're safe safely back in the office at this time, not in a potential danger zone), and by the time their reflexes catch up with what's going on, the realization that [[spoiler:John was firing blanks]] has also caught up with them.



*** It would have been easier to squeeze out using leverage from your legs via the ladder than trying to go the other was with you hand pushing in the snow.

to:

*** It would have been easier to squeeze out using leverage from your legs via the ladder than trying to go the other was way with you your hand pushing in the snow.



** Because the terrorists are still watching the airport and even if you could warn the planes about the bogus ATC and tell them about the signal fire they could have brought shoulder launched SAMs to take a few planes out.

to:

** Because the terrorists are still watching the airport and even if you could warn the planes about the bogus ATC and tell them about the signal fire they could have brought shoulder launched SAMs [=SAM=]s to take a few planes out.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Imagine you put on a ballistic vest (with or without ceramic plates). I then say "Okay, I'm going to shoot you in the chest with a 9mm round." Would you be happy about this? Likely not, because while it won't penetrate, it will likely break a rib or at least wind you badly and leave a huge bruise. Now imagine I said "I'm going to empty a magazine of 30 9mm rounds into your chest." Would you expect to be in good condition after that, or even alive? Nope.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** RuleOfDrama.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Well, to be fair, their plan hinged on the army unit sent to take them out actually being in on the plot, so ideally F-16s would not have been deployed until the ruse was discovered and they were long gone (similar to Grubers plan in the first movie- "by the time they figure out what went wrong we'll be sitting on a beach earning 20%"). In fact they have no idea that John has figured their plan out until he actually shows up on their wing, and might assume that it's just him acting alone or that any help he (may or may not have) called in for will arrive to late (which is entirely possible).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* When the terrorists are throwing grenades into Esperanza's plane, why does it take so freaking long for them to detonate?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Jet fuel has a high flashpoint for this exact reason - it's ''really hard'' to get it to ignite outside of a jet engine, and fuel vapor, while certainly flammable to a point, has to mix with oxygen in a certain ratio before it will produce a big flashy explosion. The only way it could feasibly blow up is Hollywood physics. Or the airline was smuggling nitroglycerin in the wing tanks.

Top