Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Fridge / TheGodfather

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None




to:

\n* More on the flashback in ''Part II'', it's revealed that of all his siblings, Fredo is the only one who supported Michael's decision to join the Marines. At first it looks like a heartwarming moment... But then, once we put it together with just how badly Fredo resents Michael, his father's favorite son, for stepping over him, the scene takes a much more darker turn. Of course Fredo ''wanted'' Michael to join the Marines; of course Fredo ''wanted'' Michael to keep out of family's business. Michael's mere presence makes him feel weak, ineffectual, and conscious of his shortcomings. His resentment to Michael has been growing all this time.

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** [[spoiler: Even more appropriate considering how heavily implied it is that Vito orchestrated the whole thing, with Michael just "pushing a button", so to speak.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** In the beginning of Godfather II, Connie brings a man to the party for the birthday of Michael's son. When she asked her mother, Cermaela, to help her skip over everyone else to see Michael, she tells Connie to visit her children first before waiting in line to see Michael like everyone else. The way she said it, is the same way Sonny would have said it, if he was alive.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** In addition, it's made clear in the novel that the boys come from powerful families. One's father is even a very powerful politician. Their families would be likely willing and able to exact revenge for death. A brutal beating may be seen as something they deserve.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Even worse: [=McClusky=] was a DirtyCop, which could be seen essentially as him being a traitor to the uniform, and thus beneath contempt to a man of Michael's background.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None




to:

\n* A flashback in ''Part II'' reveals that Sonny was the one who introduced Carlo to Connie. That means Sonny had to live with the knowledge that he introduced his little sister to the man who would later abuse and mistreat her. He probably regretted that for years. Sonny's anger issues aside, it's no wonder he flipped out so badly when he saw Connie had been beaten.

Changed: 485

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* The use of ''Cavalleria Rusticana'' in ''Part III'' becomes even more poignant when the ''Intermezzo'' plays over [[spoiler:Mary's death, and ultimately Michael's during]] the ending. As the ''Intermezzo'' is only played in the ''middle'' of the Opera, it highlights the realization that [[spoiler:Michael's death]] is not really the end, but simply the closing of one tragic if bloody chapter in the Corleone saga. Something that Kay voices out earlier in the film: "It never ends."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Vito refusing to kill the two men who brutalized Amerigo's daughter seems, at first, to be a PetTheDog moment for Vito. He says he's doing it because it wouldn't be justice to kill them. Instead, he's just going to have them brutalized in return. It also allows us to see Vito as a FriendlyNeighborhoodGangster. However, if you take a step back, there's numerous practical reasons why Vito would do it this way. Murder is a very serious crime which runs the risk of endangering his family and soldiers on behalf of someone who is of very little social and economic importance. Two dead civilians would also draw police attention more than dead mobsters. Amerigo is also an outsider who might suffer an attack of conscience and be able to turn on Vito with knowledge linking him to murders. By contrast, simply having two men beaten up badly for harming a young woman is unlikely to draw nearly as much attention, especially if it's common knowledge what they did. It also would be far easier for Amerigo's conscience to stomach in the long-term, even if he wants them dead now.

to:

* Vito refusing to kill the two men who brutalized Amerigo's daughter seems, at first, to be a PetTheDog moment for Vito. He says he's doing it because it wouldn't be justice to kill them. justice. Instead, he's just going to have them brutalized in return. badly beaten. It also allows us to see Vito as a FriendlyNeighborhoodGangster. However, if you take a step back, there's numerous practical reasons why Vito would do it this way. Murder is a very serious crime which runs the risk of endangering his family and soldiers on behalf of someone who is of very little social and economic importance. Two dead civilians would also draw police attention more than dead mobsters.
**
Amerigo is also an outsider who might suffer an attack of conscience and be able to turn on Vito with to the police. He'd then have knowledge linking him Vito to two murders. By contrast, simply Vito having two men beaten up badly for harming a young woman is unlikely to draw nearly as much attention, especially if it's their crime is common knowledge what they did.knowledge. It also would be far easier for Amerigo's conscience to stomach in the long-term, even if he wants them dead now.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Vito refusing to kill the two men who brutalized Amerigo's daughter seems, at first, to be a PetTheDog moment for Vito. He says he's doing it because it wouldn't be justice to kill them. Instead, he's just going to have them brutalized in return. It also allows us to see Vito as a FriendlyNeighborhoodGangster. However, if you take a step back, there's numerous practical reasons why Vito would do it this way. Murder is a very serious crime which runs the risk of endangering his family and soldiers on behalf of someone who is of very little social and economic importance. Two dead civilians would also draw police attention more than dead mobsters. Amerigo is also an outsider who might suffer an attack of conscience and be able to turn on Vito with knowledge linking him to murders. By contrast, simply having two men beaten up badly for harming a young woman is unlikely to draw nearly as much attention, especially if it's common knowledge what they did. It also would be far easier for Amerigo's conscience to stomach in the long-term, even if he wants them dead now.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Michael may not have been a mobster originally, but as stated above he was a soldier. In the mobster world, you don't touch officers. But in the world Michael was used to, the military world, you kill "officers" if they're not on your side. An opposing officer's stripes would not deter him on the battlefield. Michael could look at McClusky as something other than untouchable because of his background. McClusky was just another enemy soldier to Michael, who'd made the mistake of breaking his jaw.

to:

** Michael may not have been a mobster originally, but as stated above he was a soldier. In the mobster world, you don't touch officers. But in the world Michael was used to, the military world, you kill "officers" if they're not on your side. An opposing officer's stripes would not deter him on the battlefield. Michael could look at McClusky [=McClusky=] as something other than untouchable because of his background. McClusky [=McClusky=] was just another enemy soldier to Michael, who'd made the mistake of breaking his jaw.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Michael may not have been a mobster originally, but as stated above he was a soldier. In the mobster world, you don't touch officers. But in the world Michael was used to, the military world, you kill "officers" if they're not on your side. An opposing officer's stripes would not deter him on the battlefield. Michael could look at McClusky as something other than untouchable because of his background. McClusky was just another enemy soldier to Michael, who'd made the mistake of breaking his jaw.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* In ''Part I'', Vito says to the other dons, [[spoiler: "I swear, on the souls of my grandchildren, that I will not be the one to break the peace we've made here today." [[ExactWords Technically]], he kept his promise, but in ''Part III'', his granddaughter Mary, an innocent civilian, is killed by a bullet meant for Michael.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Originally Clemenza was supposed to reappear in Part II but actor Richard Castellano had a disagreement with the filmmakers os hiis role was filled by a new character, Frank Pentangeli. In the film Pentangelli survives an assassination attempt believed coming from Michael Corleone becomes a witness against him in the senate hearings investigating organized crime. Corleone brings Pentangeli's brother from Sicily to the hearings which causes him to recant his testimony. Later Tom Hagen gives Pentangeli Michael's offer to spare his family if he commits suicide. This wouldn't have worked if they had had Clemenza. In the scenes set in the past they show young Clemenza, played by Bruno Kirby crossing himself before eating. It shows that though he might be a murderous thug, but he's still a good Catholic, and a good Catholic wouldn't commit suicide!

to:

* Originally Originally, Clemenza was supposed to reappear in Part II II, but actor Richard Castellano had a disagreement with the filmmakers os hiis filmmakers, so his role was filled by a new character, Frank Pentangeli. In the film Pentangelli film, Pentangeli survives an assassination attempt believed coming he believes came from Michael Corleone Corleone, and becomes a witness against him in the senate hearings investigating organized crime. Corleone brings Pentangeli's brother from Sicily to the hearings hearings, which causes him to recant his testimony. Later Later, Tom Hagen gives Pentangeli Michael's offer to spare his family if he commits suicide. This wouldn't have worked if they had had Clemenza. In the scenes set in the past past, they show young Clemenza, played Clemenza (played by Bruno Kirby Kirby) crossing himself before eating. It shows that though he might be a murderous thug, but he's still a good Catholic, and a good Catholic wouldn't commit suicide!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The ending to ''Part III''. Before the passing of Mario Puzo, him and Francis had plans to make the next Godfather as Vincent's time as the Don, and he would have gone into the drug trade. [[spoiler:It would have ended with his death sometime in the mid-90s, after being hunted down and killed in a police shootout]]. Taken this account, Michael's death in '97 makes it all the more tragic since the Corleone name was by that point a worthless name because of the damage Vincent had done. Michael Corleone would have truly died broken and alone.

to:

* The ending to ''Part III''. Before the passing of Mario Puzo, him he and Francis had plans to make the next Godfather as Vincent's time as the Don, and he would have gone into the drug trade. [[spoiler:It would have ended with his death sometime in the mid-90s, after being hunted down and killed in a police shootout]]. Taken this account, Michael's death in '97 makes it all the more tragic since the Corleone name was by that point a worthless name because of the damage Vincent had done. Michael Corleone would have truly died broken and alone.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
I\'m placing this here since there isn\'t a WMG section and I\'m not sure how to create one.

Added DiffLines:

* Carmela (Vito's wife) is actually the bad apple in the marriage: all the Corleone boys have terrible defects not present in Vito: Sonny's violence, Fredo's vices and Michael's cold heart. Since all this didn't come from Vito, then it had to be from their mother's side who doesn't appear that much to be noticed as an actual evil person. In a way, she might be the BiggerBad or even TheManBehindTheMan since in the part II flashbacks she's the one who introduced her husband to the first of his "godsons" asking favors.

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Originally Clemenza was supposed to reappear in Part II but actor Richard Castellano had a disagreement with the filmmakers os hiis role was filled by a new character, Frank Pentangeli. In the film Pentangelli survives an assassination attempt believed coming from Michael Corleone becomes a witness against him in the senate hearings investigating organized crime. Corleone brings Pentangeli's brother from Sicily to the hearings which causes him to recant his testimony. Later Tom Hagen gives Pentangeli Michael's offer to spare his family if he commits suicide. This wouldn't have worked if they had had Clemenza. In the scenes set in the past they show young Clemenza, played by Bruno Kirby crossing himself before eating. It shows that though he might be a murderous thug, but he's still a good Catholic, and a good Catholic wouldn't commit suicide!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Technically, according to a "Corleone family tree" found in the Coppola Restoration compilation as an extra, [[spoiler:Vincent gets gunned down in 2005 after soiling the Corleone name by getting into the drug business.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Clarification


* The opening scene of ''Film/TheGodfather'' gives us Amerigo Bonasera asking Don Vito to kill (implied) the men who ravaged his daughter as vengeance, describing how "she will never be beautiful again." This scene is mirrored later in the film after [[spoiler:Sonny's death]], where we find Don Vito asking Bonasera not for vengeance, but simply for him to use his skills as an undertaker ''to make [[spoiler:his son]] beautiful again.''

to:

* The opening scene of ''Film/TheGodfather'' gives us Amerigo Bonasera asking Don Vito to kill (implied) the men who ravaged his daughter as vengeance, describing how "she will never be beautiful again." This scene is mirrored later in the film after [[spoiler:Sonny's death]], where we find Don Vito asking Bonasera not for vengeance, but simply for him to use his skills as an undertaker ''to make [[spoiler:his [[spoiler:Vito's son]] beautiful again.''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
I added a brilliance example.



to:

* The opening scene of ''Film/TheGodfather'' gives us Amerigo Bonasera asking Don Vito to kill (implied) the men who ravaged his daughter as vengeance, describing how "she will never be beautiful again." This scene is mirrored later in the film after [[spoiler:Sonny's death]], where we find Don Vito asking Bonasera not for vengeance, but simply for him to use his skills as an undertaker ''to make [[spoiler:his son]] beautiful again.''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Film/TheGodfather'': After [[spoiler: Sonny's death]] Don Vito calls a truce with the other four Families, saying that unless pushed he will not be the one to break it. In the game it doesn't make a bit of difference, guys, as you can still freely first-strike other Families. Then it sinks in that Vito said '''[[ExactWords he]]''' [[ExactWords won't be the one to break the truce. Nothing about cat's-paws, lackeys or underlings.]]
** In the film, he makes that arrangement in order to bring Michael back safely. It seems unlikely that he would stake risk his son's life on a bit of cheap wordplay. The other families surely wouldn't respect the truce in that instance anyway.
** He also swears that he won't be the one to break it "on the blood of his grandchildren". Shortly after we see him plotting with Michael against the other Families (partly because they know Barzini has a mole in theirs), and at the end Michael has all the other heads assassinated...and come the third movie, Vito's grandaughter by Michael is killed by a bullet meant for his son.
* Micheal was widely regarded to be a noncombatant by the different Mafia families, despite being the son of Vito Corleonne, due mainly to the fact that he stayed out of the Family Business, kept his nose clean, and was a certifiable war hero. He might as well not be part of the family as far as they are concerned, when there are far more relevant targets such as Sonny (or Vito himself) whose deaths would actually affect how the family was run. Once Micheal gets drawn in, he is shown to be [[BewareTheNiceOnes very ruthless]], and [[TranquilFury very cold]]. When asked what he would do after killing Solozzo and [[DirtyCop McCluskey]], he replied that he would sit down and finish his meal. When his godson is being baptized, he has his men do a [[ThePurge mass-killing]] of the rival family heads [[AndZoidberg and Moe Greene]]. In the second movie, he is told that he pissed off a ''lot'' of people when he did that, as it wasn't ''how things are done'', and it is implied that this bought him a short term advantage at the cost of long-term problems. Why does he take this approach? Because he doesn't have any direct background in the Mafia. He is a soldier, who was trained to deal with his enemies far more directly than what is considered appropriate in the American Mafia. If someone is an enemy and is dangerous to you, ''you kill them'' before they can do the same to you... if you are talking about two armies on the battlefield. He is WrongGenreSavvy, but ''[[DangerouslyGenreSavvy dangerously]]'' so.

to:

* ''Film/TheGodfather'': After [[spoiler: Sonny's death]] [[spoiler:Sonny's death]], Don Vito calls a truce with the other four Families, saying that unless pushed he will not be the one to break it. In the game it doesn't make a bit of difference, guys, as you can still freely first-strike other Families. Then it sinks in that Vito said '''[[ExactWords he]]''' [[ExactWords won't be the one to break the truce. Nothing about cat's-paws, lackeys lackeys, or underlings.]]
** In the film, he makes that arrangement in order to bring Michael back safely. It seems unlikely that he would stake risk his son's life on a bit of cheap wordplay. The other families surely wouldn't respect the truce in that instance anyway.
** He also swears that he won't be the one to break it "on the blood of his grandchildren". Shortly after after, we see him plotting with Michael against the other Families (partly because they know Barzini has a mole in theirs), and at the end end, Michael has all the other heads assassinated...assassinated... and come the third movie, Vito's grandaughter by Michael is killed by a bullet meant for his son.
* Micheal Michael was widely regarded to be a noncombatant by the different Mafia families, despite being the son of Vito Corleonne, Corleone, due mainly to the fact that he stayed out of the Family Business, kept his nose clean, and was a certifiable war hero. He might as well not be part of the family as far as they are concerned, when there are far more relevant targets such as Sonny (or Vito himself) whose deaths would actually affect how the family was run. Once Micheal Michael gets drawn in, he is shown to be [[BewareTheNiceOnes very ruthless]], and [[TranquilFury very cold]]. When asked what he would do after killing Solozzo and [[DirtyCop McCluskey]], he replied that he would sit down and finish his meal. When his godson is being baptized, he has his men do a [[ThePurge mass-killing]] of the rival family heads [[AndZoidberg and Moe Greene]]. In the second movie, he is told that he pissed off a ''lot'' of people when he did that, as it wasn't ''how things are done'', and it is implied that this bought him a short term advantage at the cost of long-term problems. Why does he take this approach? Because he doesn't have any direct background in the Mafia. He is a soldier, who was trained to deal with his enemies far more directly than what is considered appropriate in the American Mafia. If someone is an enemy and is dangerous to you, ''you kill them'' before they can do the same to you... if you are talking about two armies on the battlefield. He is WrongGenreSavvy, but ''[[DangerouslyGenreSavvy dangerously]]'' so.



* When I was playing ''VideoGame/TheGodfather'' game, I wanted the {{Mob War}}s to be fully playable, with running battles in the streets. Thus, I was disappointed when they boiled down to either taking out an enemy business or simply running to a FBI agent and paying some dues, with no bunches of gangsters popping out of the woodwork to rumble with. Some more playtime and deaths later, I came to a realisation: With the game's near-{{Nintendo Hard}}ness because of its pseudorealistic damage model, having to fend out randomly popping out mobsters maybe realistic but definitely more frustrating than fun. Since the game may already try one's patience normally... -- @/GentlemensDame883

to:

* When I was playing ''VideoGame/TheGodfather'' game, I wanted the {{Mob War}}s to be fully playable, with running battles in the streets. Thus, I was disappointed when they boiled down to either taking out an enemy business or simply running to a FBI agent and paying some dues, with no bunches of gangsters popping out of the woodwork to rumble with. Some more playtime and deaths later, I came to a realisation: realization: With the game's near-{{Nintendo Hard}}ness because of its pseudorealistic damage model, having to fend out randomly popping out mobsters maybe may be realistic but definitely more frustrating than fun. Since the game may already try one's patience normally... -- @/GentlemensDame883
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Micheal was widely regarded to be a noncombatant by the different Mafia families, despite being the son of Vito Corleonne, due mainly to the fact that he styaed out of the Family Business, kept his nose clean, and was a certifiable war hero. He might as well not be part of the family as far as they are concerned, when there are far more relevant targets such as Sonny (or Vito himself) whose deaths would actaully affect how the family was run. Once Micheal gets drawn in, he is shown to be [[BewareTheNiceOnes very ruthless]], and [[TranquilFury very cold]]. When asked what he would do after killing Solozzo and [[DirtyCop McCluskey]], he replied that he would sit down and finish his meal. When his godson is being baptized, he has his men do a [[ThePurge mass-killing]] of the rival family heads [[AndZoidberg and Moe Greene]]. In the second movie, he is told that he pissed off a ''lot'' of people when he did that, as it wasn't ''how things are done'', and it is implied that this bought him a short term advantage at the cost of long-term problems. Why does he take this approach? Because he doesn't have any direct background in the Mafia. He is a soldier, who was trained to deal with his enemies far more directly than what is considered appropriate in the American Mafia. If someone is an enemy and is dangerous to you, ''you kill them'' before they can do the same to you... if you are talking about two armies on the battlefield. He is WrongGenreSavvy, but ''[[DangerouslyGenreSavvy dangerously]]'' so.

to:

* Micheal was widely regarded to be a noncombatant by the different Mafia families, despite being the son of Vito Corleonne, due mainly to the fact that he styaed stayed out of the Family Business, kept his nose clean, and was a certifiable war hero. He might as well not be part of the family as far as they are concerned, when there are far more relevant targets such as Sonny (or Vito himself) whose deaths would actaully actually affect how the family was run. Once Micheal gets drawn in, he is shown to be [[BewareTheNiceOnes very ruthless]], and [[TranquilFury very cold]]. When asked what he would do after killing Solozzo and [[DirtyCop McCluskey]], he replied that he would sit down and finish his meal. When his godson is being baptized, he has his men do a [[ThePurge mass-killing]] of the rival family heads [[AndZoidberg and Moe Greene]]. In the second movie, he is told that he pissed off a ''lot'' of people when he did that, as it wasn't ''how things are done'', and it is implied that this bought him a short term advantage at the cost of long-term problems. Why does he take this approach? Because he doesn't have any direct background in the Mafia. He is a soldier, who was trained to deal with his enemies far more directly than what is considered appropriate in the American Mafia. If someone is an enemy and is dangerous to you, ''you kill them'' before they can do the same to you... if you are talking about two armies on the battlefield. He is WrongGenreSavvy, but ''[[DangerouslyGenreSavvy dangerously]]'' so.



* The ending to ''Part III''. Before the passing of Mario Puzo, him and Francis had plans to make the next Godfather as Vincent's time as the Don, and he would have gone into the drug trade. [[spoiler:It would have ended with his death sometime in the mid-90s, after being hunted down and killed in a police shootout]]. Taken this account, Michael's death in '97 makes it all the more tragic since the Corleone name was by that point, a worthless name because of the damage Vincent had done. Michael Corleone would have truly died a broken and alone man.

to:

* The ending to ''Part III''. Before the passing of Mario Puzo, him and Francis had plans to make the next Godfather as Vincent's time as the Don, and he would have gone into the drug trade. [[spoiler:It would have ended with his death sometime in the mid-90s, after being hunted down and killed in a police shootout]]. Taken this account, Michael's death in '97 makes it all the more tragic since the Corleone name was by that point, point a worthless name because of the damage Vincent had done. Michael Corleone would have truly died a broken and alone man.
alone.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[AC:FridgeHorror]]

* The ending to ''Part III''. Before the passing of Mario Puzo, him and Francis had plans to make the next Godfather as Vincent's time as the Don, and he would have gone into the drug trade. [[spoiler:It would have ended with his death sometime in the mid-90s, after being hunted down and killed in a police shootout]]. Taken this account, Michael's death in '97 makes it all the more tragic since the Corleone name was by that point, a worthless name because of the damage Vincent had done. Michael Corleone would have truly died a broken and alone man.

Changed: 1529

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Micheal was widely regarded to be a noncombatant by the different Mafia families, despite being the son of Vito Corleonne, due mainly to the fact that he styaed out of the Family Business, kept his nose clean, and was a certifiable war hero. He might as well not be part of the family as far as they are concerned, when there are far more relevant targets such as Sonny (or Vito himself) whose deaths would actaully affect how the family was run. Once Micheal gets drawn in, he is shown to be [[BewareTheNiceOnes very ruthless]], and [[TranquilFury very cold]]. When asked what he would do after killing Solozzo and [[DirtyCop McCluskey]], he replied that he would sit down and finish his meal. When his godson is being baptized, he has his men do a [[ThePurge mass-killing]] of the rival family heads [[AndZoidberg and Moe Greene]]. In the second movie, he is told that he pissed off a ''lot'' of people when he did that, as it wasn't ''how things are done'', and it is implied that this bought him a short term advantage at the cost of long-term problems. Why does he take this approach? Because he doesn't have any direct background in the Mafia. He is a soldier, who was trained to deal with his enemies far more directly than what is considered appropriate in the American Mafia. If someone is an enemy and is dangerous to you, ''you kill them'' before they can do the same to you... if you are talking about two armies on the battlefield. He is WrongGenreSavvy, but ''[[DangerouslyGenreSavvy dangerously]]'' so.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The death of [[spoiler:Aldo Trapani]] at the beginning of the second ''[[VideoGame/TheGodfather Godfather]]'' game made more sense when I started looking into the first game. Basically, ''The Godfather II'' introduced "kill conditions" to allow the player to put a rival made man [[FinalDeath out of action for good]] by using a certain execution style. [[spoiler:Aldo]] dies after being shot by a sniper, so he too must have had it as a kill condition, but because sniper rifles aren't in the first game, no one could touch him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Namespace


* ''TheGodfather'': After [[spoiler: Sonny's death]] Don Vito calls a truce with the other four Families, saying that unless pushed he will not be the one to break it. In the game it doesn't make a bit of difference, guys, as you can still freely first-strike other Families. Then it sinks in that Vito said '''[[ExactWords he]]''' [[ExactWords won't be the one to break the truce. Nothing about cat's-paws, lackeys or underlings.]]

to:

* ''TheGodfather'': ''Film/TheGodfather'': After [[spoiler: Sonny's death]] Don Vito calls a truce with the other four Families, saying that unless pushed he will not be the one to break it. In the game it doesn't make a bit of difference, guys, as you can still freely first-strike other Families. Then it sinks in that Vito said '''[[ExactWords he]]''' [[ExactWords won't be the one to break the truce. Nothing about cat's-paws, lackeys or underlings.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* When I was playing ''Game/TheGodfather'' game, I wanted the {{Mob War}}s to be fully playable, with running battles in the streets. Thus, I was disappointed when they boiled down to either taking out an enemy business or simply running to a FBI agent and paying some dues, with no bunches of gangsters popping out of the woodwork to rumble with. Some more playtime and deaths later, I came to a realisation: With the game's near-{{Nintendo Hard}}ness because of its pseudorealistic damage model, having to fend out randomly popping out mobsters maybe realistic but definitely more frustrating than fun. Since the game may already try one's patience normally... -- @/GentlemensDame883

to:

* When I was playing ''Game/TheGodfather'' ''VideoGame/TheGodfather'' game, I wanted the {{Mob War}}s to be fully playable, with running battles in the streets. Thus, I was disappointed when they boiled down to either taking out an enemy business or simply running to a FBI agent and paying some dues, with no bunches of gangsters popping out of the woodwork to rumble with. Some more playtime and deaths later, I came to a realisation: With the game's near-{{Nintendo Hard}}ness because of its pseudorealistic damage model, having to fend out randomly popping out mobsters maybe realistic but definitely more frustrating than fun. Since the game may already try one's patience normally... -- @/GentlemensDame883

Added: 4

Changed: 5

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The death of [[spoiler:Aldo Trapani]] at the beginning of the second ''[[Game/TheGodfather Godfather]]'' game made more sense when I started looking into the first game. Basically, ''The Godfather II'' introduced "kill conditions" to allow the player to put a rival made man [[FinalDeath out of action for good]] by using a certain execution style. [[spoiler:Aldo]] dies after being shot by a sniper, so he too must have had it as a kill condition, but because sniper rifles aren't in the first game, no one could touch him.

to:

* The death of [[spoiler:Aldo Trapani]] at the beginning of the second ''[[Game/TheGodfather ''[[VideoGame/TheGodfather Godfather]]'' game made more sense when I started looking into the first game. Basically, ''The Godfather II'' introduced "kill conditions" to allow the player to put a rival made man [[FinalDeath out of action for good]] by using a certain execution style. [[spoiler:Aldo]] dies after being shot by a sniper, so he too must have had it as a kill condition, but because sniper rifles aren't in the first game, no one could touch him.


Added DiffLines:

----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** He also swears that he won't be the one to break it "on the blood of his grandchildren". Shortly after we see him plotting with Michael against the other Families (partly because they know Barzini has a mole in theirs), and at the end Michael has all the other heads assassinated...and come the third movie, Vito's grandaughter by Michael is killed by a bullet meant for his son.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** In the film, he makes that arrangement in order to bring Michael back safely. It seems unlikely that he would stake risk his son's life on a bit of cheap wordplay. The other families surely wouldn't respect the truce in that instance anyway.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

!!The Movies
[[AC:FridgeBrilliance]]


Added DiffLines:


!!The Video Game
[[AC:FridgeBrilliance]]
* The death of [[spoiler:Aldo Trapani]] at the beginning of the second ''[[Game/TheGodfather Godfather]]'' game made more sense when I started looking into the first game. Basically, ''The Godfather II'' introduced "kill conditions" to allow the player to put a rival made man [[FinalDeath out of action for good]] by using a certain execution style. [[spoiler:Aldo]] dies after being shot by a sniper, so he too must have had it as a kill condition, but because sniper rifles aren't in the first game, no one could touch him.
* When I was playing ''Game/TheGodfather'' game, I wanted the {{Mob War}}s to be fully playable, with running battles in the streets. Thus, I was disappointed when they boiled down to either taking out an enemy business or simply running to a FBI agent and paying some dues, with no bunches of gangsters popping out of the woodwork to rumble with. Some more playtime and deaths later, I came to a realisation: With the game's near-{{Nintendo Hard}}ness because of its pseudorealistic damage model, having to fend out randomly popping out mobsters maybe realistic but definitely more frustrating than fun. Since the game may already try one's patience normally... -- @/GentlemensDame883

Top