Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Fridge / JurassicPark

Go To

OR

Added: 374

Changed: 126

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

*** Ah, but Hammond ''did'' pay for those mistakes, and very much in the sense of how he meant that phrase in the first place.
* Tim and Lex are very excited to see Grandpa (Hammond) early in the movie, and envelop him in a big hug the moment they see him. On the helicopter ride back from the island, it's Grant (who saved them from dino-horror), and not Hammond (who brought them there), who the kids are snuggled up against while they sleep. Symbolic, perhaps, of what else Hammond may have lost.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* On the subject of Dennis Nedry, even if he had been successful in getting the embryos delivered, there is no way he would have gotten away with it. His behavior prior to the outage and mysterious disappearance would have been incredibly suspicious when the theft was discovered. He was getting played alright. Dodgson was stupid for even revealing his name to Nedry to begin with. Nedry would have been the only one implicated the next day.

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Hammond says several times as he is showcasing the park that he "spared no expense". However, in his first dispute with Nedry, Nedry indicates that he was hired with a low bid and that he's not getting paid what he's worth. It implies that Hammond's insistence is not actually true, that he in fact cut some corners.
** This also adds an element of irony to his asking that people pay for their mistakes. Dennis Nedry was a mistake that John Hammond literally refused to pay for.

to:

* Hammond says several times as he is showcasing the park that he "spared no expense". However, in his first dispute with Nedry, Nedry indicates that he was hired with a low bid and that he's not getting paid what he's worth. It implies that despite Hammond's insistence is not actually true, that to his guests, he did in fact cut some corners.
** This also adds an element of irony to his asking belief that people pay for their mistakes. Dennis Nedry was a mistake that John Hammond literally refused to pay for.

Added: 162

Changed: 318

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Hammond says several times as he is showcasing the park that he "spared no expense". However, in his first dispute with Nedry, Nedry indicates that he was hired with a low bid and that he's not getting paid what he's worth. It implies that Hammond's insistence is not actually true, that he in fact cut some corners.
** This also adds an element of irony to his asking that people pay for their mistakes. Dennis Nedry was a mistake that John Hammond literally refused to pay for.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* The whole "Don't move and they won't see you" part regarding the T-Rex seems to be a mistake at first with what is knows about the dinosaurs, but if one recall what the dinosaurs where spliced with, it makes perfect sense. It's not the dinosaurs that got motion-based vision, it's the ''frogs''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
How To Write An Example - Don't Write Reviews


* As pointed out in a YouTube comment, of all things, in the scene in ''The Lost World'' when the parent tyrannosaurs are first heard, the very first thing Malcolm does--before even asking if there's any way to contact the trailers--is turn off the kerosene lantern in the High Hide. This isn't just a smart move for if you don't want to be seen: he was remembering his very first encounter with a ''Tyrannosaurus'' in the previous movie, and what had attracted Rexy to the first car and nearly killing Tim and Lex--''they were shining a light around and it drew Rexy's attention''.

to:

* As pointed out in a YouTube Website/YouTube comment, of all things, in the scene in ''The Lost World'' when the parent tyrannosaurs are first heard, the very first thing Malcolm does--before even asking if there's any way to contact the trailers--is turn off the kerosene lantern in the High Hide. This isn't just a smart move for if you don't want to be seen: he was remembering his very first encounter with a ''Tyrannosaurus'' in the previous movie, and what had attracted Rexy to the first car and nearly killing Tim and Lex--''they were shining a light around and it drew Rexy's attention''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The first film [[VisualEffectsOfAwesome pioneered new special effects technology]]. Soon afterwards, films started relying too much on special effects and not enough on their human aspects. This parallels how John Hammond relied too much on technology to run the park and not enough on human beings.

to:

* The first film [[VisualEffectsOfAwesome [[SugarWiki/VisualEffectsOfAwesome pioneered new special effects technology]]. Soon afterwards, films started relying too much on special effects and not enough on their human aspects. This parallels how John Hammond relied too much on technology to run the park and not enough on human beings.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Hammond's line about him not blaming people for their mistakes but do asking them to answer for them, makes a lot more sense after [[Film/JurassicWorldFallenKingdom]] revealed that [[spoiler: his old friend, Benjamin Lockwood, who helped Hammond co-found Jurassic Park and develop the cloning technology, cloned a human (his deceased daughter in this case) , before Jurassic Park was even created, a flat-out illegal action in most of the planet, he couldn't blame Lockwood for it, after all, Lockwood [[KnightTemplarParent just wanted his daughter back]], but he did made the latter pay for it by cutting off his ties with him forever]].

to:

* Hammond's line about him not blaming people for their mistakes but do asking them to answer for them, makes a lot more sense after [[Film/JurassicWorldFallenKingdom]] [[Film/JurassicWorldFallenKingdom Fallen Kingdom]] revealed that [[spoiler: his old friend, Benjamin Lockwood, who helped Hammond co-found Jurassic Park and develop the cloning technology, cloned a human (his deceased daughter in this case) , before Jurassic Park was even created, a flat-out illegal action in most of the planet, he couldn't blame Lockwood for it, after all, Lockwood [[KnightTemplarParent just wanted his daughter back]], but he did made the latter pay for it by cutting off his ties with him forever]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Hammond's line about him not blaming people for their mistakes but do asking them to answer for them, makes a lot more sense after [[Film/JurassicWorldFallenKingdom]] revealed that [[spoiler: his old friend, Benjamin Lockwood, who helped Hammond co-found Jurassic Park and develop the cloning technology, cloned a human (his deceased daughter in this case) , before Jurassic Park was even created, a flat-out illegal action in most of the planet, he couldn't blame Lockwood for it, after all, Lockwood [[KnightTemplarParent just wanted his daughter back]], but he did made the latter pay for it by cutting off his ties with him forever]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Grammatical correction


** In fact, there are now ''two'' known species of dromaeosaurs matching the ''Jurassic Park'' raptors for size, and one each to the areas attributed to them: there's ''Achillobator'' in Mongolia and ''Dakotaraptor'' in North America. A retcon could very well have the skeleton dug up at the beginning of the first film as being a ''Dakotaraptor''. (Based on the rules of cladistics and taxonomy, though, they'd still be called ''Velociraptor'' in-universe since that name would have precedent--the only exception ''ever'' to this in real-life was ''Tyrannosaurus'' over ''Manospondylus''.) Not to mention that Grant would have been more or less influenced by paleontologist Gregory S. Paul's then current cladistics, which had nearly every dromaeosaur besides ''Dromaeosaurus'' itself placed in teh ''Velociraptor'' genus.

to:

** In fact, there are now ''two'' known species of dromaeosaurs matching the ''Jurassic Park'' raptors for size, and one each to the areas attributed to them: there's ''Achillobator'' in Mongolia and ''Dakotaraptor'' in North America. A retcon could very well have the skeleton dug up at the beginning of the first film as being a ''Dakotaraptor''. (Based on the rules of cladistics and taxonomy, though, they'd still be called ''Velociraptor'' in-universe since that name would have precedent--the only exception ''ever'' to this in real-life was ''Tyrannosaurus'' over ''Manospondylus''.) Not to mention that Grant would have been more or less influenced by paleontologist Gregory S. Paul's then current cladistics, which had nearly every dromaeosaur besides ''Dromaeosaurus'' itself placed in teh the ''Velociraptor'' genus.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The very last line Grant's ChekovsLecture in ''Film/JurassicPark'' about respecting raptors and their power as predators proves to be an aesop for the franchise's carnivorous dinosaurs in general, as every person who openly disrespects, exploits, or abuses them is literally EatenAlive, [[CruelAndUnusualDeath often very slowly]].

to:

* The very last line Grant's ChekovsLecture ChekhovsLecture in ''Film/JurassicPark'' about respecting raptors and their power as predators proves to be an aesop for the franchise's carnivorous dinosaurs in general, as every person who openly disrespects, exploits, or abuses them is literally EatenAlive, [[CruelAndUnusualDeath often very slowly]].

Added: 456

Changed: 78

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The very last line Grant's ChekovsLecture in ''Film/JurassicPark'' about respecting raptors and their power as predators proves to be an aesop for the franchise's carnivorous dinosaurs in general, as every person who openly disrespects, exploits, or abuses them is literally EatenAlive, [[CruelAndUnusualDeath often very slowly]].
-->'''Dr. Grant''': "The point is, you're still alive when they start to eat you. So try and show a little respect, okay?"



** Every biological inaccuracy shown by the movie and the book can be explained by the fact that the scientists who made the dinosaurs screwed with their genetics and may have even tailored them to fit the expectations of visitors. A nifty way of averting the pitfalls of such a work when ScienceMarchesOn. In fact, Dr. Wu [[LampshadeHanging points this out]] in ''Film/JurassicWorld''.
-->'''Dr. Wu:''' Nothing in Jurassic World is real! If I used pure DNA, a lot of these animals would look very different."

to:

** Every biological inaccuracy shown by the movie and the book can be explained by the fact that the scientists who made the dinosaurs screwed with their genetics and may have even tailored them to fit the expectations of visitors. A nifty way of averting the pitfalls of such a work when ScienceMarchesOn. In fact, Dr. Wu [[LampshadeHanging points this out]] to Masrani in ''Film/JurassicWorld''.
-->'''Dr. Wu:''' Nothing in Jurassic World is real! If I we used pure DNA, a lot of these animals would look and act very different.differently. But you didn't want 'real', you wanted 'more teeth'! "

Added: 130

Changed: 2

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* It can be universally agreed on that Nedry is a massive Jerk who brought about his own doom, but take a moment to think of what might have happened if he had never shut the park down like he did. If the events of the first movie/film had not happened like they did (with a relatively small start-up staff and a handful of guests), then such events might have happened much further down the road, when Hammond had opened the park to ''the general public''. And ''Film/JurassicWorld'' showed this ''exact'' scenario.

to:

* It can be universally agreed on that Nedry is a massive Jerk who brought about his own doom, but take a moment to think of what might have happened if he had never shut the park down like he did. If the events of the first movie/film had not happened like they did (with a relatively small start-up staff and a handful of guests), then such events might have happened much further down the road, when Hammond had opened the park to ''the general public''. And ''Film/JurassicWorld'' showed this ''exact'' scenario.
** To say nothing of the fact that the island itself was a ticking time bomb literally waiting to explode when no one expected it.

Added: 123

Changed: 80

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Every biological inaccuracy shown by the movie and the book can be explained by the fact that the scientists who made the dinosaurs screwed with their genetics and may have even tailored them to fit the expectations of visitors. A nifty way of averting the pitfalls of such a work when ScienceMarchesOn.

to:

** Every biological inaccuracy shown by the movie and the book can be explained by the fact that the scientists who made the dinosaurs screwed with their genetics and may have even tailored them to fit the expectations of visitors. A nifty way of averting the pitfalls of such a work when ScienceMarchesOn. In fact, Dr. Wu [[LampshadeHanging points this out]] in ''Film/JurassicWorld''.
-->'''Dr. Wu:''' Nothing in Jurassic World is real! If I used pure DNA, a lot of these animals would look very different."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In fact, there are now ''two'' known species of dromaeosaurs matching the ''Jurassic Park'' raptors for size, and one each to the areas attributed to them: there's ''Achillobator'' in Mongolia and ''Dakotaraptor'' in North America. A retcon could very well have the skeleton dug up at the beginning of the first film as being a ''Dakotaraptor''. (Based on the rules of cladistics and taxonomy, though, they'd still be called ''Velociraptor'' in-universe since that name would have precedent--the only exception ''ever'' to this in real-life was ''Tyrannosaurus'' over ''Manospondylus''.)

to:

** In fact, there are now ''two'' known species of dromaeosaurs matching the ''Jurassic Park'' raptors for size, and one each to the areas attributed to them: there's ''Achillobator'' in Mongolia and ''Dakotaraptor'' in North America. A retcon could very well have the skeleton dug up at the beginning of the first film as being a ''Dakotaraptor''. (Based on the rules of cladistics and taxonomy, though, they'd still be called ''Velociraptor'' in-universe since that name would have precedent--the only exception ''ever'' to this in real-life was ''Tyrannosaurus'' over ''Manospondylus''.)) Not to mention that Grant would have been more or less influenced by paleontologist Gregory S. Paul's then current cladistics, which had nearly every dromaeosaur besides ''Dromaeosaurus'' itself placed in teh ''Velociraptor'' genus.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added sub-bullet to dilophosaurus/Nedry aggression discussion (provoked by threat display)

Added DiffLines:

*** Exactly so, and moreover, it was ''provoked.'' When Nedry first encounters the dilophosaurus, she's inquisitive and more or less just curious; there's this new creature that looks funny and keeps making odd noises. But then Nedry makes his fatal mistake: he puts up the hood of his rain slicker. The yellow hood, which looks ''very much'' like the display frill of the dilophosaurus, particularly backlit as it is by the Jeep's headlights. So far as the dilophosaurus could tell, Nedry was threatening her, and empty threats aren't really a concept most animals are acquainted with. He threatened her, so he started the fight. When he turned and ran, she realized she could take him, so she did.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* John Hammond's essential character is established moments before we actually meet him. When we actually first see him, he's avuncular, friendly and enthusiastic -- however, he arrives via landing his helicopter very close to a dig site without alerting anyone that he's coming, thus not giving them any time to prepare and risking damage to the valuable and fragile fossil they've just arrived. For all his kind-heartedness, he's very careless -- something which will be proven by the catastrophe at Jurassic Park.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** The disorganized behavior of the animals being completely unnatural was a major point of the second ''book'', which spent a fair bit of time on the fact that many of the dinosaurs should have had a lot of learned social and cooperative behaviors and lived in family groups, whereas the artificially created dinosaurs were fighting among themselves and the entire ecosystem was collapsing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The way the T-Rex attacks the tour vehicle makes sense given it's status as a predator; it doesn't know what a car is, and likely assumes it's some sort of armored dinosaur/animal. So it does the most logical thing: pushes it onto its back and attacks its (hopefully) softer belly. When this doesn't work (since the vehicle is metal), the T-Rex then goes for the vehicle's tires (which it probably assumes are the feet).

to:

* The way the T-Rex attacks the tour vehicle makes sense given it's status as a predator; predator[[note]]Not counting the RoarBeforeBeating, which is illogical but standard with movie monsters[[/note]]; it doesn't know what a car is, and likely assumes it's some sort of armored dinosaur/animal. So it does the most logical thing: pushes it onto its back and attacks its (hopefully) softer belly. When this doesn't work (since the vehicle is metal), the T-Rex then goes for the vehicle's tires (which it probably assumes are the feet).



** Even better, in the case of inconsistencies with modern dino knowledge (like the absence of feathers), it is mentioned that Dr. Wu had been mixing and matching DNA, then just waiting to see what grew out of it. If it didn't "seem" right based on current knowledge about dinosaurs, he'd go back to the drawing board, and try a few revisions. If Wu had seen some feathered dinos well before anyone knew about them, then why wouldn't he consider it a "glitch"? There's even a line somewhere in the novel about the JP dinos only being as close to actual dinos as they can guess from modern scholarship by folks like Dr. Grant. It seems Crichton wrote in his own defenses against ScienceMarchesOn!

to:

** Even better, in * In the case of inconsistencies with modern dino knowledge (like the absence of feathers), it is mentioned that Dr. Wu had been mixing and matching DNA, then just waiting to see what grew out of it. If it didn't "seem" right based on current knowledge about dinosaurs, he'd go back to the drawing board, and try a few revisions. If Wu had seen some feathered dinos well before anyone knew about them, then why wouldn't he consider it a "glitch"? There's even a line somewhere in the novel about the JP dinos only being as close to actual dinos as they can guess from modern scholarship by folks like Dr. Grant. It seems Crichton wrote in his own defenses against ScienceMarchesOn!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Her behavior is clearly not predatory, though: by opening her frill and hissing at Nedry, she's trying to ''scare him'', which suggests either self-defense or combat aggression rather than hunting.

Added: 516

Changed: 862

Removed: 2638

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** A neat idea if not for the fact it's practically worthy of being a doctoral thesis in ArtMajorBiology.
** ArtMajorBiology is a fundamental building block of the series' existence.
* It can be universally agreed on that Nedry is a massive Jerk who brought about his own doom, but take a moment to think of what might have happened if he had never shut the park down like he did. If the events of the first movie/film had not happened like they did (with a relatively small start-up staff and a handful of guests), then such events might have happened much further down the road, when Hammond had opened the park to ''the general public''.
** I think that would fit better in a FridgeHorror section.
** And now we have ''Film/JurassicWorld'' showing this ''exact'' scenario. FridgeHorror, indeed.



** Hammond has been funding Grant's dig. Given that DNA used to create the parks dinos is acquired from mosquitoes not dino bones and you can potentially learn more by observing living dinosaurs than by examining fossilized ones there isn't much motivation for this except Tim idolises Dr. Grant and Hammond adores his grandson. It's possible the idea for Jurassic Park came when Hammond saw how dinosaur obsessed his grandson was.
*** Unlikely. Tim is nine in the movie and eleven in the book. The technology for JP would have taken much longer to develop and refine for this to be the case.



** And now we have ''Utahraptor'', a giant dromaeosaur (well, giant by dromie standards) about the same size as ''Jurassic Park'''s creatures. Six-foot turkey, indeed.
*** Well, not quite. They may have been the same height, but ''Utahraptor'' was a good bit longer than the JP raptors and weighed about twice as much (about the same as a polar bear). the JP velociraptors were based entirely off of Deinonychus, with the name changed for RuleOfDrama.
*** In fact, there are now ''two'' known species of dromaeosaurs matching the ''Jurassic Park'' raptors for size, and one each to the areas attributed to them: there's ''Achillobator'' in Mongolia and ''Dakotaraptor'' in North America. A retcon could very well have the skeleton dug up at the beginning of the first film as being a ''Dakotaraptor''. (Based on the rules of cladistics and taxonomy, though, they'd still be called ''Velociraptor'' in-universe since that name would have precedent--the only exception ''ever'' to this in real-life was ''Tyrannosaurus'' over ''Manospondylus''.)

to:

** And now we have ''Utahraptor'', a giant dromaeosaur (well, giant by dromie standards) about the same size as ''Jurassic Park'''s creatures. Six-foot turkey, indeed.
*** Well, not quite. They may have been the
creatures -- same height, but ''Utahraptor'' was a good bit longer than the JP raptors and weighed about twice as much (about the same as a polar bear). the JP velociraptors were based entirely off of Deinonychus, with the name changed for RuleOfDrama.
***
bear).
**
In fact, there are now ''two'' known species of dromaeosaurs matching the ''Jurassic Park'' raptors for size, and one each to the areas attributed to them: there's ''Achillobator'' in Mongolia and ''Dakotaraptor'' in North America. A retcon could very well have the skeleton dug up at the beginning of the first film as being a ''Dakotaraptor''. (Based on the rules of cladistics and taxonomy, though, they'd still be called ''Velociraptor'' in-universe since that name would have precedent--the only exception ''ever'' to this in real-life was ''Tyrannosaurus'' over ''Manospondylus''.)



** Well, that or she was [[ItCanThink one of the smarter dinos]], not as smart as the raptors, but smart enough to know that [[BerserkButton Nedry called her stupid.]]



* There were three ''Velociraptors'' in Jurassic Park, but only two attack the protagonists in the climax. Where's the third one? The kids locked her in the freezer!
** You just figured that out?



* Owen's raptors are named '''B'''lue, '''C'''harlie, '''D'''elta and '''E'''cho. They follow him because he is their '''A'''lpha.
** Nothing Fridge about that, really. Owen says EXACTLY that in the movie.



* The entire film is Malcolm's statement of Chaos theory in effect. Nedry turned off all the systems, which turned off the electric fences allowing the dinosaurs to escape at the very instant the tour cars were driving past the ''T. rex''. Grant, when trying to save Tim from the tree, accidentally turned the wheel making it so that the car could fall through the branches. Sattler rebooted all the systems just as Tim was climbing down the electric fence, thus shocking him. Nedry, meanwhile, hit a sign causing him to not know where the docks are, causing him to drive towards the ''Dilophosaurus'', and do to the rain storm, be unable to steer correctly, causing his car to get stuck. He then trips do to a small waterful caused by the rainstorm and lose his glasses. AND due to the dinosaur's DNA having gaps, they had to fill those gaps with that of another animal's. Using frogs allowed them ample opportunity to reproduce.
** In describing chaos theory, most use weather as a perfect example. That's true in this case. If not for the storm, Nedry likely would have given the embryos over to his contact at the docks and been back in his seat entering the reset command before anyone knew anything was wrong. If anyone did notice the phones were out or the internal security blanked out for a few minutes, he can just brush it off as glitch #152.
*** This was explicitly stated in the novel: Nedry planned for everything, except for that storm!

to:

* The entire film is Malcolm's statement of Chaos theory in effect. Nedry turned off all the systems, which turned off the electric fences allowing the dinosaurs to escape at the very instant the tour cars were driving past the ''T. rex''. Grant, when trying to save Tim from the tree, accidentally turned the wheel making it so that the car could fall through the branches. Sattler rebooted all the systems just as Tim was climbing down the electric fence, thus shocking him. Nedry, meanwhile, hit a sign causing him to not know where the docks are, causing him to drive towards the ''Dilophosaurus'', and do due to the rain storm, be unable to steer correctly, causing his car to get stuck. He then trips do due to a small waterful caused by the rainstorm and lose his glasses. AND due to the dinosaur's DNA having gaps, they had to fill those gaps with that of another animal's. Using frogs allowed them ample opportunity to reproduce.
** In describing chaos theory, most use weather as a perfect example. That's true in this case. If not for the storm, Nedry likely would have given the embryos over to his contact at the docks and been back in his seat entering the reset command before anyone knew anything was wrong. If anyone did notice the phones were out or the internal security blanked out for a few minutes, he can just brush it off as glitch #152.
*** This
#152. In fact, this was explicitly stated in the novel: Nedry planned for everything, except for that storm!



** Licensed literature for the film states that the hatched eggs were those of the Gallimimus young, which have similar feet to the Velociraptors.

to:

** Licensed literature for the film states that the hatched eggs were those of the Gallimimus young, which have similar feet to the Velociraptors.Velociraptors.
* It can be universally agreed on that Nedry is a massive Jerk who brought about his own doom, but take a moment to think of what might have happened if he had never shut the park down like he did. If the events of the first movie/film had not happened like they did (with a relatively small start-up staff and a handful of guests), then such events might have happened much further down the road, when Hammond had opened the park to ''the general public''. And ''Film/JurassicWorld'' showed this ''exact'' scenario.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Well, another explanation for their stabilized behavior could be because they were raised by other raptors. With a lot of social creatures in real life, especially ones that are raised without a peer group or parents to teach them social behaviors, they will often grow up displaying erattic and unpredictable behavior. Wild animals raised in captivity can have this mitigated by handlers who know what they're doing, and know what wild behaviors they should be learning and how to handle them (with mixed success), but the raptors in the first movie didn't have that. No one in the first movie knew for sure what any of the dinosaurs' natural behaviors should be and probably just assumed that all behaviors would be instinctive, which backfired as horribly as everything else.

to:

*** Well, another explanation for their stabilized behavior could be because they were raised by other raptors. With a lot of social creatures in real life, especially ones that are raised without a peer group or parents to teach them social behaviors, they will often grow up displaying erattic erratic and unpredictable behavior. Wild animals raised in captivity can have this mitigated by handlers who know what they're doing, and know what wild behaviors they should be learning and how to handle them (with mixed success), but the raptors in the first movie didn't have that. No one in the first movie knew for sure what any of the dinosaurs' natural behaviors should be and probably just assumed that all behaviors would be instinctive, which backfired as horribly as everything else.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Well, another explanation for their stabilized behavior could be because they were raised by other raptors. With a lot of social creatures in real life, especially ones that are raised without a peer group or parents to teach them social behaviors, they will often grow up displaying eradicate and unpredictable behavior. Wild animals raised in captivity can have this mitigated by handlers who know what they're doing, and know what wild behaviors they should be learning and how to handle them (with mixed success), but the raptors in the first movie didn't have that. No one in the first movie knew for sure what any of the dinosaurs' natural behaviors should be and probably just assumed that all behaviors would be instinctive, which backfired as horribly as everything else.

to:

*** Well, another explanation for their stabilized behavior could be because they were raised by other raptors. With a lot of social creatures in real life, especially ones that are raised without a peer group or parents to teach them social behaviors, they will often grow up displaying eradicate erattic and unpredictable behavior. Wild animals raised in captivity can have this mitigated by handlers who know what they're doing, and know what wild behaviors they should be learning and how to handle them (with mixed success), but the raptors in the first movie didn't have that. No one in the first movie knew for sure what any of the dinosaurs' natural behaviors should be and probably just assumed that all behaviors would be instinctive, which backfired as horribly as everything else.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Hammond has been funding Grants dig. Given that DNA used to create the parks dinos is acquired from mosquitoes not dino bones and you can potentially learn more by observing living dinosaurs than by examining fossilized ones there isn't much motivation for this except Tim idolises Dr. Grant and Hammond adores his grandson. It's possible the idea for Jurassic Park came when Hammond saw how dinosaur obsessed his grandson was.

to:

** Hammond has been funding Grants Grant's dig. Given that DNA used to create the parks dinos is acquired from mosquitoes not dino bones and you can potentially learn more by observing living dinosaurs than by examining fossilized ones there isn't much motivation for this except Tim idolises Dr. Grant and Hammond adores his grandson. It's possible the idea for Jurassic Park came when Hammond saw how dinosaur obsessed his grandson was.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The way the T-Rex attacks the tour vehicle makes sense given it's status as a predator; it doesn't know what a car is, and likely assumes it's some sort of armored dinosaur/animal. So it does the most logical thing: pushes it onto its back and attacks its (hopefully) softer belly. When this doesn't work (since the vehicle is metal), the T-Rex then goes for the vehicle's tires (which it thinks are it's feet).

to:

* The way the T-Rex attacks the tour vehicle makes sense given it's status as a predator; it doesn't know what a car is, and likely assumes it's some sort of armored dinosaur/animal. So it does the most logical thing: pushes it onto its back and attacks its (hopefully) softer belly. When this doesn't work (since the vehicle is metal), the T-Rex then goes for the vehicle's tires (which it thinks probably assumes are it's the feet).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*The way the T-Rex attacks the tour vehicle makes sense given it's status as a predator; it doesn't know what a car is, and likely assumes it's some sort of armored dinosaur/animal. So it does the most logical thing: pushes it onto its back and attacks its (hopefully) softer belly. When this doesn't work (since the vehicle is metal), the T-Rex then goes for the vehicle's tires (which it thinks are it's feet).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Adding additional information.


* If one looks closely at the footprints leading away from the hatched eggs Grant and the kids find in the first movie it can be noticed the tracks only have two toes. The only species in the park with that number of digits on the feet are the ''Velociraptors''. This is actually plausible given it was stated not only did the park originally have more raptors, but also that they had their own paddock before being moved to the container they were in. It could be that very same old raptor paddock which Grant and the kids were moving through. One of the pack members killed by "The Big One" could have turned male and had a clutch with one of the females, this clutch going unnoticed when the remaining three raptors were moved to the smaller enclosure. Not only does this mean the dinosaurs were breeding months before the inspection guests were invited, but that there actually ''are'' more raptors on Nublar than the film's three.

to:

* If one looks closely at the footprints leading away from the hatched eggs Grant and the kids find in the first movie it can be noticed the tracks only have two toes. The only species in the park with that number of digits on the feet are the ''Velociraptors''. This is actually plausible given it was stated not only did the park originally have more raptors, but also that they had their own paddock before being moved to the container they were in. It could be that very same old raptor paddock which Grant and the kids were moving through. One of the pack members killed by "The Big One" could have turned male and had a clutch with one of the females, this clutch going unnoticed when the remaining three raptors were moved to the smaller enclosure. Not only does this mean the dinosaurs were breeding months before the inspection guests were invited, but that there actually ''are'' more raptors on Nublar than the film's three.three.
**Licensed literature for the film states that the hatched eggs were those of the Gallimimus young, which have similar feet to the Velociraptors.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Actually in what can only be described as a hilarious ironic fate the truth is in Muldoon's statements of always being present for anything related to the Raptors and the fact he is in view of them... They KNOW him, he is there for feeding, moving, medical things, etc,.. He is their one constant in life. They likely viewed him as part of life and while they were fine mauling him didn't want to kill him, just teach him who is dominant now.

to:

** Actually in what can only be described as a hilarious ironic fate the truth is in Muldoon's statements of always being present for anything related to the Raptors and the fact he is in view of them... They KNOW him, he is there for feeding, moving, medical things, etc,.. He is their one constant in life. They likely viewed him as part of life and while they were fine mauling him didn't want to kill him, just teach him who is dominant now. Years later Owen does the same thing but ensures its in a positive light instead of a dominating scary one.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**Actually in what can only be described as a hilarious ironic fate the truth is in Muldoon's statements of always being present for anything related to the Raptors and the fact he is in view of them... They KNOW him, he is there for feeding, moving, medical things, etc,.. He is their one constant in life. They likely viewed him as part of life and while they were fine mauling him didn't want to kill him, just teach him who is dominant now.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** This was explicitly stated in the novel: Nedry planned for everything, except for that storm!

Top